write to us on telegram, we will contact the relevant departments and be sure to tell you about everything in our next instruction. this morning, the russian military repelled an attack by drones in the crimea, as sergei shoigunok told a colleague of the ministry of defense, three drones were supposed to hit objects in sevastopol, but were destroyed, it is noteworthy that two of them were shot down by girls, a senior

sailor and the main scary, whom he promised to present for an award. today, from 4:00 am to 5:56 am , an attempt was made to hit our targets in crimea sevastopol unmanned aerial vehicles. all devices, all three devices, were destroyed , which i would like to draw your attention to, two devices were also destroyed by a contract service sailor, field service marina alexandrovna and, most importantly , foreman kissing tatyana vitalievna. for destroying enemy targets. at the meeting , sergei shoigu also spoke about the modernization of the russian army.

by the end of the year, the share of modern weapons in the aerospace forces will reach 85% play an important role in maintaining stability during the special operation combat experience received up to 90% of the crew and operational-tactical and army aviation 85% of the personnel complexes. during the operation , more than 140,000 sorties were completed in total, the aerospace forces destroyed more than 20,000 enemy objects and a less important task personnel. the russian foreign ministry believes that the use in ukraine of ammunition with combined uranium, which the british military promised to provide, will become

genocide. in relation to the population of the territory where they may be used, this was stated by an official representative of the foreign political department. maria zakharova and now she is getting in touch with us directly on this topic. we will discuss in more detail maria vladimirovna hello. thank you for taking the time to make a powerful statement. you did today. and why hard? but the fact is that you need to know history, and it seems to me that in this sense, london, making such a provocative statement , will remind you. it was made against the backdrop of high-level talks in moscow between the heads of the russian federation and the people's republic of china, they are several. i mean, uh, the british non-partners somewhat simply disproportionate the effect that will be, uh, to these provocative throws. uh, achieved they wanted to demonstrate once again. uh, so to speak, or

bring the escalation of the conflict to a new level. they wanted, i think, they wanted to somehow just spoil the informational , informational and political, but the picture that cannot be spoiled. er, i mean in the context of high-level bilateral negotiations. but moscow beijing but caused it. somewhat different the point is that in europe , uh, directly, and on the european continent, uh, they remember quite well what depleted uranium is and remember. it is not only those who are engaged in physics and chemistry. uh, not only narrow specialists on the issue, probably, of the industrial complex remember, people remember and they are well aware of the events in yugoslavia and yes, then these events were with the west, practically classified, as the serbian statesmen, mr.

dacha, said at one time, and 20 times it was, uh, nato underestimated the level of use of the quantitative level of use of the combined uranium in relation to, and the citizens of yugoslavia are primarily serbs. but then, however, a surge of oncological diseases in the region began to break out, after all. this does not spare anyone who is not serbs. not representatives of other nationalities. not the same the very nato contingent that used these shells against the so-called enemy, which was, uh, the inhabitants of the indigenous inhabitants of this territory. but the worst thing is, uh, because it has the effect of just a delayed-action mine, because the earth that takes over it. i mean these beats with these substances. she becomes infected for decades. again, uh, you need to

read and uh check with experts. how long does it take to activate d, and do not use this particular verb in relation, but to the infected land. how long does it take to activate the soil, but this is a process that takes decades, and i remind you, it requires knowledge of huge investment funds and so on and so forth, who will do it, the british? of course not. when they did not do this, therefore, the effect of this statement e of the british side. and i think e in many respects exceeded their expectations, they hoped for something else, but they simply do not know the history themselves and they assume that we do not know this history. and of course, the enormity of these statements, and it was revealed, including on background of discourse. it contains the west about how they want

to help ukraine as a state, how they want to bring ukraine into some kind of prosperous economic, so to speak, realities of the future, and how they take care of the rest. in terms of food security , for several months now we have been observing their hysteria regarding the so-called grain deal. you remember how they tried to accuse our country of almost undermining international world, uh, food security. and although everything is exactly the opposite, you can set that a question that today is by no means rhetorical raised by russian foreign minister sergei lavrov at a press conference following negotiations with a sharp partner. and what will happen to the very grain

that will be cultivated, and on this territory, if it is used there , the appropriate weapon with combined uranium we already perfectly understood that this grain will be contaminated not only grain, but also other food that will be produced there, it does not matter will. well there grow grow grow pack and so on or just transit. well, any sane person understands this, but this is also exactly the same as another addition to the treasury of what the russian leadership is talking about that this is the very war. the west really goes to the last ukrainian. they destroyed them in different ways, first by shaking the situation in ukraine for decades from the inside, then setting the people of ukraine off at different angles. then, like this, openly, engaging in anti-case coups and simply setting fire to the situation in the country now decided to even and poison. well, in general, i

think that there is no need to even draw conclusions here. they are obviously mary exactly, but maybe this is a low level of education. uh, representatives of the establishment, if that's possible. british, because the statement was made by the deputy minister of defense. if i'm not mistaken, and she, uh, the woman calls it a standard ingredient. anti try to justify themselves, what is it supposedly? it's just included in the kit. well , i won’t hide the load of such doubts yesterday. we have checked the quote. she turned out to be true were. well, there were options that, perhaps, they would dose. today, this statement is somehow again noted in some of its extreme unprofessionalism, but they began to go the other way, talking about the fact that they did not tell anything new. and that this is standard procedure for them. well, in this part, for the fact that this is a standard situation for britain and, in general, the anglo-saxon bunch

of situations. in this, they are not deceiving anyone. let's remember yugoslavia once again , let's remember iraq, let's remember those catastrophic consequences for the environment and for several generations. some have inflicted the use, but of projectiles with combined uranium. uh, it's standard for them. here in such a western standard, i recall, by the way, saying, but the situation is in yugoslavia with the bombing of uh belgrade, the murder of a huge number of the population, and then the death of the population from cancer . and there was a huge outbreak. this has been scientifically proven, by the way, even an italian commission was created for oncological diseases among italian military personnel in nato contingents contingent. so the whole operation in yugoslavia was nato, i can’t even say the operation , not so much the name, but the subtitle, its main idea was that this is a humanitarian intervention for the good, so

for them the standard situation is that they carry out humanitarian interventions for the good, the result of which is such terrible consequences of killing and, uh, infecting people. okay, but can i can i go a little further? please excuse me, but hiroshima and nagasaki did not have this either. this is what, for them, a non-standard situation is taught by japanese schoolchildren. it’s our fault that these bombs were dropped, and by the united states of america it was the first and today, thank god, the only one in the history of the use of nuclear weapons against people. let me remind you, this is not just, but a belligerent or, uh, opposing side. these were civilians. these were peaceful people. there, of course, there were those who, a, belonged to the armed forces and so on, but the bombardment-bombing went on in the cities.

you remember the consequences of these consequences japan and hmm tried to overcome. and although they were not insurmountable videos of a huge number of people infected with radiation sickness, but of the most important mutations and so on, but for a decade. so maybe this very standard that britain is talking about today a was laid down then and they do not deviate from it. okay, let's remember. and vietnam uses napalm. this is also a gold standard in quotation marks, and western dialogues, when for the sake of momentary superiority, it is possible to use them for anything, any means. then they justify. this is through the mass media through massive information and political campaigns generously paid. well, that is , the paper itself is painted green and, uh, the printing press

is working properly. this is the standard, then, yes, then i confirm indeed. they operate according to a standard, but it is not our standard. this is not the standard of those who consider themselves. being civilized responsible and proceeding from the interests of man of mankind and humanity. then did not help them in vietnam kicked out in disgrace. e from this country, but indeed millions have suffered jungle still can not recover from the application. napalm is a terrible environmental disaster. eh, maria vladimirovna, and yet they call it a standard component, and yet the international community is not working to ban the united uranium. is it possible to somehow raise this issue at the international level and somehow work in this direction. do you know? this is, of course, an expert question. i'm happy and really.

now i'm gathering all the materials and historical and uh, who reveal this problem from a scientific point of view, i will be happy to find those experts who can be on your air, but to talk about this topic from the point of view of international legal perspectives and features, but the modern one of this international circuit that regulates. the topic of my vladimirovna has one more point. ah. it seems that it was such a throw-in the day before, well, in addition to changing the agenda and so on, but there were still attempts. uh, this topic should somehow be included in the media on the agenda, because it has long been western meteorologists and so on. we talked a lot with colleagues about this. they seem to say, yes, i use the atomic bomb. it's not scary. it's okay. well, it will be winter a little, and then everything will be fine. that is, they seem to be trying to probe the public opinion on this topic. what do you think, and the americans

will follow the same path? will they? but somehow and here in this direction to work too, and i would remind you of their own term new. new to normal in everything. yes, this is the so-called gender policy. yes , 80 genders is not clear what it is, but it's just a new normal new. uh, family perception. yes, i don’t know what they call a partner, but a partner. b is also a new normality there are a huge number of such new normalities. and this is another area of ​​application of the new normal. here is a free in quotation marks, we put free ownership. uh, the topic of nuclear weapons is their use, because usually when we use the word free we mean professional free, but this means a person is talking, but on a topic in which they are well oriented and have an e base e, historical factual, on which

it relies today, you see, and this concept has been replaced. they have free conversations. nothing in general, do not limit yourself from the point of view. knowledge of the realities of science in the first place , probably even the turn, they are absolutely not guided by any data, but science has been trampled. oh, and in many other areas. well, we were talking about gender, yes, and if a person is inspired and history has long been about the fact that in fact there is not a man and a woman, but there is just a human preparation, and then the person himself, as he uses clothes, tries on various gender images. this is absolutely anti-scientific. okay, let's take another one. here it is, as it were, natural. yes, there is science, and let's take something created by human hands, please, art. there were

paintings by aivazovsky yes, there were paintings by repin , these were paintings, and russian artists precisely. this is how these artists painted themselves, signing the paintings. just so about them at their life wrote, uh articles. uh, literary journalistic texts of criticism devoted to them. that is how they were declared, including at world exhibitions. today, absolutely contrary to science, they are renamed as their paintings, just the name is given to others, that is, the artist gave one name during his lifetime , 100-150 years have passed. uh, they took it and changed the name just like that, they just took it and changed it, and they are changing in the same way. well , for example, nationality citizenship. and that they can not object anything, but it's the same thing. it's the same the wild new normality being taught to, uh, the general public in the west. so

freely, arguing about what, in fact, they have no idea. and i think that if , uh, that's it, it wasn't the way i hmm imagine and i take it off, but something different, namely responsibly, then maybe the british ministry of defense, when they made a similar statement yesterday, i would have bothered to tell my audience. what is united uranium? what are combined uranium projectiles and what are the consequences after their use? after all, they felt so at ease talking about newcomers to salisbury and aysbury. all of them at one moment, but turned into someone toxicologists. yes , scientists, chemists, i all at once, they are all their own britain, but they were fluent in this topic. and why not talk so freely about the united uranus and what can

happen to people with the nature they cared about so much, because the green agenda is literally flooded now, and liberal , uh, philosophy, political views, and so on. and so on. and what will happen to flores, fauna with products with products and so on, but no, why? because the conversation will turn out to be sad and the population of the same britain is not sure that they will appreciate this initiative of their own ministry of defense, - they say - this is not a thunberg, but for some reason she does not see it. it does not hear and certainly these are all attempts. and justify your goals and justify your actions. eh, there are any eh, invented things. wait until greta tuberka is definitely a comfortable liberal, and the tool is this very one, but western dictatorships. it is taken out when it is necessary to cover it and when it is also necessary, when

it is necessary, they put it on a pedestal, they give it all kinds of awards, it performs. well, about like zelensky, after all. see the same approach, that is, from film festivals and music competitions. the un site is immediately filled to capacity everywhere. this is how they perceive it. and or this is how they understand this very soft power, that is, the more pr , the more advertising, the more effective it should be, apparently, from their point of view, then the hero is changed. now they are talking about thunberg, as if not destiny, that is, uh, and all these very measures of police influence are applied to her in these very eu states, which just yesterday the day before yesterday a year ago 5 years ago criticized us for a much more civilized relations. well , the same, but an illegal rally by protesters outside the agreed framework, and so on and so forth. here it is today, but they put it in. uh, they take you to the police cars. eh, they delay and so on, then when

it is necessary, uh, and who needs it in order to highlight this or that topic. that's how it is too say they remember to give some kind of bonus, and then they push it back again, so for now you, uh, so to speak. don't ever write it off completely. yes, it will be useful to them again when it is useful, they will again bring it into the arena, as they do with everyone and you always see, now, due to the fact that a large number have appeared. and so to speak media environment accessible to all video materials of various archives. we can literally turn over the pages of this very western ideology, a la playing democracy already remember how they accepted it. uh, i don’t know, in the white house in the state department there are a huge number of all those who, in just a couple of years, or they were westerners, were executed , killed, tried, carried out to them. some guilty verdicts were declared enemies and

vice versa, and such a story was all those who really were realist extremists, who was just branded on whom, where was it to put? all hands up to the elbows in blood, after some time they received them, again, as better guests of western, e liberal communities, therefore here the game goes on for a long time. yes marina vladimirovna this is the last award. god forgive the women and the call, uh, that the americans awarded, who killed the parents of the children are already established facts. let's go back to the united wound. will they? will we apply to the ministry of foreign affairs of the international organizations or wait for now? maybe they will come to their senses, some more statements will be made by the british. well, it seems to me that, uh, it is obvious that this topic, which we will comment on both in terms of information and planetary in terms of diplomacy, including,

but, because the scale of the disaster, which is very sometimes prepared, and it concerns the anglo-saxons. not a single country, not two countries, not a single region, even though the consequences will be for the whole world. you understand this very well. well, at least we understand this very well, there are no opportunities today, even with everything, but the development of science and so on, to localize the damage from the use of such shells. well, there is no such possibility. well, i always give an example. e, relating to nuclear weapons. and so we talked a lot in the context of zaporozhye there on power plants. you remember very well how the kiev regime escalated the situation , shelled and endangered, and the westerners did not see anything. well, they did not personally see anything, but in fact they only inspired the kiev regime to great

overthrows. we talked about this in the context, but here is the current statement that radiation has poisonous substances of this kind. substances will never e will be able to clarify civil citizenship nationality political views they act like a fan cover. they amaze everyone indifference will not be there. uh, there will be no stopping before the borders of some state, but it will affect the customs regime, and we perfectly remember the chernobyl tragedy and fukushima. by the way, speaking, everyone also remembers very well, that's a focusable tragedy. she. in general, hmm, after all, it was quite local, as it seemed, but after all, it, uh, touched a huge number of states in different parts of the world, and the consequences are still felt and felt

, you know, and this uh thing will absolutely be, which is not subject, in principle, to any localization, who cares? because the true tasks, but of the collective west, and now we are talking about the nato-centric regimes, which are headed by washington and london, because the true task was by no means the prosperity of the same ukraine and inflicting only on us, as they call strategic defeat. the true goal is different. just to bring down the general region is their gold. here's a dream up price level. there is no center of power, no world center. and as always put in full dependence on themselves to take resources to take opportunities to take everything they need, you don’t ask, especially without paying anything, but

again, apparently, they simply forget that resources are, after all. well, even if it is logic that suddenly triumphs, er, in their minds. this is possible. that's exactly what's in their minds all of a sudden. maybe, but after all, even in this logic , they must understand that it will all be infected. them. but given as people who absolutely do not own in the west, nothing of history. okay, history. come on, already the latest history, even the realities of the day. but we me probably shouldn't be reminded. yes, these are brilliant conclusions, so to speak, beerbock. uh, theresa may for the track sheet and many others, but they do not know, just primitive, the most banal, the most primary concepts of international relations, how their countries, their peoples of the transcendent side of the people became hostages of this unprofessionalism of stupidity

and absolutely immorality. thank you so much for taking the time, let me remind you, we spoke with the official representative of the russian ministry of foreign affairs maria zakharova we are ready i am a programmer hairdresser landowner welder. fu, but i decided to volunteer for my own i'm going to protect my loved ones. well, in fact the interests of their country. we train fighters for saving blood. the district recruiting office passed before your eyes. i

will wring out seventy times on my fists now i believe everything. go, make out, step over yourself and stay on the sidelines. i just can not. if you bring the jews out of here, we will introduce you to the rank of alexander gitsenko, now only soviet people could save other fish. there is no, yevgeny tkachuk i’m lucky i’m definitely not going to be with you until the end of my life fedor dobronravov is considered to figure it out on the shelves, sort it out four moves ahead, sees sergey makovetsky i heard you need responsible comrades to get ahead of me comradely kiselyov konstantin khabetsky never lost. no , this is a device that finds the way.

sberbank presents a loan with the lowest rate in 10 years. yes, friend, how much we had with you, remember, i was looking for the keys, and you had them, how did you not let me sleep i unraveled my springs, how are you tired of the sofa?