tkachuk has me lucky i definitely don’t see me. i 'll be with you until the end of my life fedor dobronravov is considered to figure it out on the shelves, sort it out four moves ahead, sergei makovetsky sees i heard you need responsible comrades for the campaign. lean from me, comrade kozlev, konstantin khabibsky.

the device by which he finds his way sergei ursulikators countries and you want kirby to be smart with such an employer that you are attached to a riser from whom his relatives took away the peace card and take his pension from him, and he doesn’t even knows that he is our pensioner. he does not even know where the branch of the pension fund of the russian federation and the state services of independence, that is, they themselves have registered under his name, and there all issues are decided, they need to be checked at all. maybe they do not move there, what kind of property was written out for him like that, but this, of course, is all a joke. there's an ever-decreasing amount of joke in it, but

what's going on with americans is political communication. it's monstrous because, well, you know, uh, i was a witness. i still remember how runu. trading confused iran with cancer, but it was a system that compensated for the defects of an old and really already sick person by that time. this system has ceased to compensate for these defects. this means they told us everything about institutions. now look what happens when an institution stops working, but there is no personality. here it is. it's scary, but true. what can they do now? they understood perfectly. they understood more than was said about xi's visit to moscow . that's right. that's why they're so confused, that's why they're so insecure , that's why that's why bolton got out because bolton is a parasite bolton is the jackal of american

politics that comes out when it smells carrion, and the current political regime in washington is carrion. well, what should they do? in this situation, they have only one option left to further raise rates. and this is already scary, because they stupidly overestimated them there, which is further scary. then you need to get into first into ukraine, get out of the conflict around ukraine and enter into a conflict in nau ukraine, yes, and then and then take on direct obligations. in the field of security in relation to secrecy. well, yes, it is possible, but only idiots can do such fearless actions. i mean, personally zelensky and personal alfasholz. but by the way, our fuls also began to show some signs, what is called

the movement of neurons in the brain. he began to remember as well. he talked with vladimir vladimirovich putin, it turns out. this struck me terribly. well, even in such a pacifier as a schlotz, neurons began to move, that is, roughly speaking , there are two fearless ones left. and zelensky well, actually, as always, this has been and has been in the history of europe. but hmm good ones. well, this is not good news either, but i'll tell you such a thing , two such things are enough. the first one is hard for me. you know i'm chinese, but i can tell you, i'm delighted. the spirit of partnership that the cdp and the chinese country as a whole showed during the visit, in my opinion. china has even moved on in many ways. well, their approaches in

the field of partnership. china really has grown tremendously over these past few years in terms of understanding geopolitics. china has gone further in demonstrating the spirit and possibility of partnership with russia than i could imagine, but is there a nuance? and the nuances are very simple. and then it’s up to us, the chinese showed us the space for partnership, but we must fill it with reindustrialization. we must create a new system of political and socio-economic management. we must show new priorities in culture and we will see our own vision of the future where we let's go, because china - this is it. it was obvious and china declared it. well, where are we going? where is he going to go, where will there be

free space? no, that's where the level of partnership needs to be matched, and the last little point is the problem, and here i am looking at the europeans at the macron at the same scholz, and they need a war. we all proceeded from the fact that they were the first to break. no, they are starting to use war as a tool to maintain their power, especially seen in macron, as a tool for screwing screws inside , as a tool for reducing civilian freedom. they saddled the idea of ​​war into a big war in europe, and these ones can go much further than we might think advertising.

i have this weird habit. i love good news. i don't like bad ones. you see amazing properties. so that's all the last three days, including today. i think we have heard very good news. very good. yes, i think it's a visit. uh, or rather so, so to speak, state visits meetings on xi jinping. and putin is really a historical event, uh, which is really directed beyond the horizon, yes and uh, this is an event that it is, so to speak , more than putin's personal perspectives and if the empire and this is very important. this is very important. it seems to me that it is simply impossible not to see this. and by the way, and i because a lot of good things were said. i 'll go through a little, you know, such traditional places of criticism of russian attitudes. in fact, i have always advocated

that we should not be a copy of either the west or the east there. no need to become chinese now, so to speak, we all wanted to be some cowboys like that with a vegetable base. and now how are we going to dress up in a kung fu panda costume. no, no, we should be ourselves, using, as it were, experience from them and others, so to speak, and at the same time understanding the really real strategic prospect of cooperation with china, but i will go over those points that we usually know, uh, they are trying criticize. well , for example, we say that we have completely unequal relations. we are now an appendage of china so to speak, and that's all. such other things we are not independent. here is a huge china and here we are. i think it's uh, wrong, i'll say it. why, because yes, there are in separate, so to speak, areas. uh, let's say some kind of so to speak, the engines to the right and left. maybe even distortions somewhere we are more dependent on them, somewhere they are, but on the whole this creates a balance that is quite suitable for the historical movement forward. i will just remind you of a speech that conceptually is actually a theory of a multipolar world and a denial

of a unipolar world. still, it was invented in the first place, russia did it putin during the munich conference. again it is possible there to treat putin so to speak so to say so to treat, uh, we all like to criticize reality , so to speak, and sometimes this is absolutely right, but back in the zero years, when china did not take such a clear position on this issue, putin quite accurately articulated simple things a unipolar world led by the americans, this is not the kind of world that is needed for development. this is a conflict model that is actually based on the colonial perception of reality, and which in fact cannot be beneficial in this form most countries in the world in my personal opinion. china joined this concept when it joined this philosophical understanding of how to move forward, because if you remember that year, and look , what was, so to speak, yes, china's political position on topics or issues, how active it was. in my opinion, conceptually , the initiative here is on our side, and these

are the basics, as it were, movements in what, so to speak, yes, have they formulated? we are first . i am absolutely sure of this, the second about all sorts of distortions, and so on. listen, the military-technical cooperation between russia and china is simply not particularly articulated, but in fact we have done and are doing a lot to strengthen the chinese defense capability. chinese. this is understood by another question, that not much is written about it, it doesn’t have, it means that there are so many details that, yes, you can constantly throw it into the telegram channel and so on, but it is the content of this cooperation. she is very serious very serious, among other things. eat historical uh, the continuity of our relations with china i think. eh, sometimes we either underestimate this or just look at it, purely situational in my personal opinion. we saved the chinese state. there are quite a few. yes, the soviet union did this after the forty-fifth year, freeing china from the japanese, so to speak, the interventionist divers and, in my opinion, er, so to speak, in china , fundamental assistance in the revival

of statehood and the chinese. in my opinion , with all the hee. still remembers this, because china in the late 19th early 20th century. it was china, which was in ruins, frankly , the chinese statehood was, well, in a very difficult situation on the verge of extinction, if not for the soviet union , perhaps such a state to china in its current form. it just wouldn’t have happened at all, as the economy was the first to join in the modernization of the chinese economy was the soviet union, beyond any sleigh, the basis for this was laid by soviet assistance and military economic relations, and so on. and in my opinion the chinese. still, they remember it. i'm just here some quotes do not speak chinese , unfortunately, but some quotes from chinese are translated, so, uh, i saw and interestingly one of the quotes was that the chinese are grateful to our country. yes? for us today we are also accustomed to this seven-minute act. she has a very, it’s clear with what gratitude, after all, it’s us all of them who clap all their clothes and so on and so forth, and now we should be grateful for nothing of the kind, in fact, really real historical ones. so to speak, these

processes. they always have come from the past through the present to the future. and these roots, as it were, of the past are extremely important. again , so to speak, these talks about the fact that the chinese, you know, they only dream, so to speak, how to capture us, how to say dosakupirovat. and back in the 2000s , i wrote about this in an article about the chinese question. yes, i think that the chinese will take exactly as much as we give them or how much we allow them to take? yes, they will always e fight for influence, but the keys to those scarecrows that we traditionally each scare another. they are with us, we have all this trade, so to speak, there and so on and so forth all this talk about chinese. uh, so these migrant migrants and so on. i’m generally very strange when they talk about chinese migrants who have seized everything and see other migrants everywhere around. yes, for some reason you can’t even talk about them, he says, no, you can’t talk about them. and where are these huge tops of chinese migrants, where are these tea town districts, where are they? show me where they are. uh, we know it was so to say, two show i love

chinese food two cast one chinese chinese. building 1 the first, so to speak , powerful impetus to the anti-chinese mood was given when, so to speak, e is our controversial leader. nikita sergeevich khrushchev, as it were, had a fight with china, as it were, in places simply because of his stupidity. let's put it this way, yes, here is damansky and all that, and so chinese hemism began there, the threat of chinese chauvinism and other things, the second push is the nineties. i remember well who promoted these chinese topics. these are the people worked on american european grenades. they told me that it was very scary to be. with china, it is very dangerous to be with china. in no case should one be brought up to be the west, because china is not today. tomorrow everyone will be attacked, you have to be the west. and why do you need to be the west, and for that you need to be the west, so that the west uses in the case of russia against china since they are now using ukraine against russia, this is the fate in fact, as they would see for themselves, therefore many of these horror stories, even if they have some kind of ground, yes, in fact, and

the manipulative nature has and we would have the keys to these things. we sell round timber to china. yes cole so to speak. yes, i want to say who sells. we sell, and the chinese are to blame for what they buy. well, do not sell, who sells, organized crime, which has been sitting on this since the nineties, who is to blame, who is to blame, the chinese, as it were, or we are to blame. from this, yes, from this, as it were, it is necessary to dance according to many in many of these parameters, plus everything. eh, as for this this warp, they buy, it is the raw material of semi-finished products. we bought ready-made goods. there is such a problem. there is such a problem, but i also would not have this problem really. yes, that's just the way it is. uh, highlighting- why because it's actually very important for the chinese. yes, it's a raw material, but they can't live without it. in fact, especially in the current situation, when us relations are getting worse and worse and

overland to these hydrocarbon delivery routes are acquiring military-political and strategic meaning. yes, indeed they can buy everything in another place they will bring. i still leave lng, but only the americans allies have such an overwhelming advantage at sea that they can block any supplies by sea, they can generally just do it at once. just at once, the chinese understand this, so i say, well, we are just oil for them we sell. what does it mean only what does it mean only europe has built prosperity on our cheap gas. for several decades, increasing the competitiveness of their own products. now this epoch is for them ends for the chinese. this is a serious factory. it is also a very important other issue that we cannot stop at. but this is a strategically important mutual dependence. yes, i am convinced of this, and, among other things, there really is an ideological commonality. it does not consist in simple things there, who is red, who is white, but in this approach to two, er, main issues deeper even than relatively

speaking, the red white department. the first is really claims from the west for messianism and world governance, unacceptable it is impossible to live with them, it does not allow anyone to develop , and secondly, both the country in its own way are looking for a symbiosis between tradition, modernity and the future, here, in fact, there is a very great development potential, including for us, at least i always said this, because this symbiotic relationship is extremely important, because from the roots actually come those nourishing juices that will give you perspective today and tomorrow. and why do i say good news, because i believe that all this news is directed to life. here we have a twist. we are very often immersed in negative news. negative news sells better and is more disturbing. how would it be, what is called, so to speak, emotions, in fact , addiction, but this negative news or even from this military mathematics , you know what, despite the fact that i understand everything perfectly, as if, when all this is death, that's all tenth. this is understandable, but

the media concentrates on this why because it is about death, it must be about life, these 3 days were about life, this does not mean that we should depend on them. and literally so to speak, two little essengers, when they tell us, well , of course, russia has crawled. now there is nowhere to go to china, firstly, there is where to go, in fact, there is nothing so catastrophic in our situation. although there are seriously very difficult moments, but with all this, i would like to draw your attention. that's what and the chinese are also at risk, who told you that china just like that, passing by, decided to make you happy with its very cooperation, nothing like that, americans the europeans are threatening, all kinds of other satellites are threatening, but this one is building a bite, they risk a lot , they actually risk a lot, but at the same time they choose just such a deep level of cooperation, the last one about the fact that if the dnp is not putin, they said about an oncentric measure, of course, of course, he is in general, such an organization, so to speak, that there are even more and more questions. but why don't we launch our own

reform initiative with china? oh, the west says a lot about reform un for your benefit. let's think about whether it can really be reformed, but in some other direction, for example, the simplest thing, so to speak, right down to it. such a superficial one does not need a headquarters in an apartment, it is not necessary to be in america, because they do not give visas to diplomats, because they do not give the opportunity to delegations. let's move them somewhere else to a neutral side, by the way, for example, to india if this initiative comes from china . let's move the headquarters to india , maybe this will somehow help. uh, means, e normalization of relations between china named, which will be very important, why not? yes, this is a fantasy, but i think that actually ending with just such paradoxical moves, it is necessary to break the rules of the game that are being imposed on us yes, as long as we play by their rules. they are not for nothing about the rules. write the rules. they are unspoken , paradoxically, it is necessary to get out of these rules. don't make them react to the kiwis, who are there he is, of course, smart, but to be honest, i think he almost cried. ok

cried. well, i thought that in general, in my life, as it were, i went through many stages of my relationship with china, i remember that the boys found a chinese film on television opium war. this is to say the struggle of the chinese people against the british colonialists. in general, i liked these films of the thermos were chinese, nothing, apparently much different. and here then it was impossible in this, then it all began to disappear. cooling down began, then the damansky unusual explosion of patriotism among the youth party of 68. i remember it just kipelov all of us there is what it all was, yes, then a long pause. then i went to china for the first time in 1987 from the first week of soviet cinema

after a long long break, where the chinese met us simply unusually unusually met us heartily friendly, just tearfully it was. and then i had the feeling that china was a completely finished country, that will never rise. at that time, we have our own processes of shlyak, and china gave the impression of being so killed by a completely strange, where there were no cars, no tvs , no bikes. that's it, then i went many times already in china at these festivals. i saw how it all rises, i must say that the achievement of the chinese people is simply extraordinary what they created. and this is 80 in a very short period of time in my memory in my life. 35 years old, i don’t know, maybe there are some nuances, but here’s what i personally saw since the eighty-seventh year, the last

time i was with a white tiger at the shanghai festival was the thirteenth year. well just something extraordinary. but no, then i was in beijing again, in my opinion, yes, well, why am i saying this to the fact that, of course, this event is absolutely incredible. by the way, it seems to me that i am interpreting the words of comrade son about a hundred years. well, i think i understand what he means he means the russian revolution for him. this is logical. and it really was such a turning point in the history of the twentieth century, and including a turning point here in relation to china, the chinese revolution, the soviet union of colonialism, which explored beyond this. i think that's what he means when he says that this is an event. and it seems to me, yes, i agree with those who believe that this is an event that changes

the world order in general. i would note. uh, and i would say, thank you, you know, and these comrades and the chinese people in general in his person, because i would pay attention. here's another thing , after all, in principle, they still had time. they might not have arrived yet. they have this time. they could well still pull the wait, as they say, play on this and what he arrived, and so publicly absolutely clear exactly with these words, dear friend gave, in general, with all his whole, with all his behavior, this benevolent semi-smile throughout. all of these it was a show of support. it is very important. for us, in our current situation, by the way, this is very

humane. i understand that he certainly prepared very well. there is a wonderful analyst in china there, everything that sergey alexandrovich spoke about is known, and china the phobia is local here, and in these conversations that the chinese are now everything is there and this and we will be second third, and not named, and all this china phobia that we have, frankly, during these last meetings. you don't even know my love in china, right? yes yes yes. yes, there is such a moment, and, most importantly, most of all, it touches that it is already coexisting. china will rob us, damn it, vaz robbed the west for 20 years and you were silent. you just robbed, you did everything under the smell that they wanted there, while putin started this very carefully and started this withdrawal and you were silent. and then nothing happened already, these they are us

rob. we will be an appendage. and the fact that you were an appendage of the west didn’t bother you, how about this in general? well, as they say, separately. this is our own russian history, and it is clear that it is clear here. this is what seems to be happening, of course. this is a twist, in my opinion. well, in my opinion. here personally it is adequate to turn. which happened 300 years ago under peter in my opinion. russia at that time an asian country went west. and, by the way, from was accompanied by the same this. west beard shave snuff snuff. no, we won't as if all this was. and why did this happen, because there were technologies in the west, then there were technologies in the west and russia moved there, in my opinion. today is actually behind all this top layer. actually its. uh, china's americans

lies inland. it seems to me that the interest of the russian people is really leaving russia, the east which in my opinion is obviously becoming the center of the world. i can't imagine that china has already lost , some think they say well, china, there it is, they have a lot of trade, if americans are blocked americans will not block, because if they block, that they will have 700 billion goods, that everything will collapse with them. spain in the late 19th early 20th century. that's how she lived on what she robbed in the colony. so, suddenly she found herself without these colonies and she had nothing left, and franco franco appeared, he was distinguished primarily

by his desire for order, and he began to conduct his summit with harsh methods. he had to carry out combat missions if he had not been able to transfer the maracanese troops to spain then, it is not known what could happen , the soviet union considered spain as a distraction of germany and its allies. on the fields of spain, there was no option to win one death, the other also death.

aksai markets, larger in size

than the infamous stolichnaya cherkizon , worked like clockwork, fsb officials suspected the owner of the market of washing away millions. i am not the new russian and old soviet engineer of the friendly businessman karim babaev and the former head of the aksai district of the rostov region, vitaly barsenko. accused of creating an organized criminal community. leninsky district court. arrested the trickster of the aksai region. vitaly borzenko from the ground. he had 1.2. you don’t see any violation of the law in this, i don’t manually watch the market of 60-70 million. they went to a certain direction, who covered the dark affairs of financial tycoons, they never believed anyone , i will fight to the last to justify them. we took on the case and conducted our own investigation. and it's

the truth of the brutal loss of thousands of people the state was going to a single rigid system. where i am, holding the state together like it was in the ussr, we are building a new world and a new person. this is a memory, someone likes it, someone doesn’t, but it is a memory and you and i have one to win, we

need to win so in my opinion. this extraordinary alliance that has developed is taking shape. this, of course, is still a long way to go. this is understandable, but nonetheless. it's already obvious this is, of course, the alliance such a future is giant china with its technologies. today, with his energy , it must be said that he has a very competent political system, which is very well built and suitable for