[000:00:00;00] nuclear weapons in belarus the situation in ukraine and unknown details of the visit of the chinese leader to moscow the president of russia answered questions from the media the russian military destroyed five sabotage groups, and the tankers thwarted the offensive of the units all the way roads and bridges went under water and call him a flood at risk are social facilities and settlements. the master and margarita in st. petersburg premiere performance of the ballet the project was created with the support of the presidential fund for cultural initiative weapons to kiev explosions on the nord streams and details informal talks between the leaders of russia and china in moscow, president vladimir putin answered a question from the media, the full version of the interview is on air right now. hello.

of course, great interest. er, did your recent talks with the head of china raise a lot of questions, but i would like, if i may , to start topics that are of great concern to many russians the west continues to pump ukraine with weapons. as they say, to repel russian aggression, and more and more often there are signals that a counteroffensive is being prepared, many different messages on this topic is, for example, there is a message that, and not the hero of drones. it can inflict some kind of unexpected, but blow, and there are really a lot of reports about the preparation of this counteroffensive. but this is not an official announcement. but we hear and a lot of different official messages. at a high level, high-ranking statements are heard almost every day that there will be new deliveries of tanks of various modifications. the european union is going to supply ukraine with an additional million more. artillery ammunition deliveries of fighters are starting, and they

are planned, and then what kind of threats to russia, well, cargo. of course there is, when the country with which we have a conflict is supplied with its weapons, that is, threats. as for what are these threats for us, how can they be assessed? of course, we see, we hear, we know about these supply plans, we wanted to say about a million shells. uh, about the stand of tanks. look, first, a million. it's a lot or a little. so a very decent amount. uh, that's a lot, but then what comes after that, but it's it is very important, firstly, in the leading countries, uh, nato, let's say in the same united states of america, based on these sources that we have, about

14-15 thousand shells up to 5,000 are produced monthly. and what so 15 months only brought this year, next year, too, according to the data that we have, they may, of course, be inaccurate, but on the whole they correspond to certain parameters that we know about, next year, uh, plans to produce already 42.000. and on the 20th uh the fifth is 75.000. well, what will happen in the twenty-fifth? we are not we know. but now this year it means 14:15. despite the fact that the heights spend

up to five thousand per day of hostilities. yes, this is the first thing that concerns us. well, we are the forces of russia. now i do not want to assess the rationality of decision-making at different levels of military command. but now, uh, as you know, the ministry of defense and the general staff are forced to introduce even certain limits for the production of the russian complex of russia are very fast cops, which many did not expect to develop, and over the same period of time, this million arsonists of this conflict. they will deliver , as they plan to ukraine, these munitions over the same

period of time. russian industry itself will have three times more ammunition, about which we are talking, even more than three times more. so in this sense, we are worried about this whole thing only from the point of view that this is an attempt to prolong the conflict. well, uh, you mentioned a different technique there. let's say about tanks, we also know about this, the arsonists are planning to send about 400 -odd 400 20 or 440 to ukraine, everything is the same there, that in terms of ammunition during this time we will be produced. uh, also hears 1,600, and the total number of tanks of the russian army will exceed three times. uh, the number of tanks

is even more than three times, i'm not talking about aviation, there's a difference at times, just 10 orders of magnitude. that is why, from the point of view of the logic of those who provoked this conflict and are trying to save it at any cost. well , this is probably the right decision from their point of view. in my opinion. this will only lead to more tragedy, it is also going to increase production around the world. well that's what i think if the united states is going to, uh, go from 15,000 this year to 49 years next year, it will be even harder for others, and then there are rules. each country has its own development plans and the armed forces of the economy, so to speak, health education infrastructure and

so on, we will need it in any way. but this question. here we are building our economy in such a way that i do not allow excessive militarization. we have all our plans in the area of ​​hmm civil health construction. there is also education and infrastructure development. we don't cut anything, and they 'll have to cut another statement. the west is such a fair amount, out, coming out. this is a statement from this uk secretary of defense that they are also starting to supply combined damage ammunition. you commented on this topic during a joint statement with sidimpin, and then another head of belarus spoke, he said that in response to russia, he could supply tactical nuclear weapons in belarus, but the british say that these munitions are with combined uranium. they are almost completely

almost harmless and supposedly no radioactive trace, they do not leave, as this, of course, is not the case. the thing is, of course, they don't. the discharge of weapons of mass destruction is true, but the cores of projectiles with e, combined damage. there can be different material used, it is used for armor-piercing purposes hmm uh , it still generates the so-called radiation dust in one way or another, and in this sense , of course, it belongs to, uh, k. uh, weapons of the most dangerous nature. uh, well, experts, experts confirm that after use in the former south. glory after using the crayfish, i repeat , the oncological diseases among local citizens have increased many times over. this is the first. secondly, if we are talking about ukraine, then those who will apply must understand that they consider those people

who live in this territory to be their own, how they will use e against people who actually have their own . keep in mind that this is there will be dust on the residues, including polluting the sown areas in the regions where they will be applied. and, of course, in this sense can be attributed. this is to e, the most harmful and dangerous weapon for a person. uh, not only for combatants for combatants for the environment for the people living in this territory, uh, i must say that russia certainly has something to answer. without exaggeration, we have hundreds of thousands of exactly hundreds of thousands of these, probably, we still do not use the famous ukrainian chernozem. this is a question waiting for its painstaking study by those who initiate such

counterintuitive normal logics and humanitarian. steps is another issue that i am also sure that people want, which, by the way, concerns our negotiations with alexander lukashenko from belarus. well, the reason was, probably, the statement for the british minister of defense that they were going to supply, and shells to ukraine with combined damage. eh, well, i repeat. it is related to nuclear technology in one way or another. these are obvious things on but hmm and even out of er, the context of these events of this statement. e alexander grigoryevich lukashenko has long been raising questions about deploying russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus. well, not here either, nothing out of the ordinary. uh, first of all, the united states has been doing this

for a decade. they have long deployed their tactical nuclear weapons in six states on the territory of their allies of the nato countries in europe. this is if memory serves, this is the federal republic of germany, turkey, the netherlands, belgium, italy and greece well, greece now. well, there is storage. uh, and we agreed that if in belarus but really, uh, in this sense, aleksandrovich is right? he says, well, listen. you are your closest allies. why do the americans do it as their ally on their territory, they teach, by the way, saying their crews of their pilots. uh, use this weapon if necessary. we agreed that we did the same without violating our obligations. i would like to emphasize this without violating my international obligations and not proliferation. uh, nuclear

weapons. we have not already helped our belarusian colleagues to convert their planes to belarusian air force planes 10 planes, ready for the use of this type of weapon, the first we have already transferred to belarus our well-known very effective complex from counter and it can also be a carrier from april 3, we start training crews. and on july 1 we are finishing the construction of a special storage facility for tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus .

agreements will take place in the very near future, and under what conditions can the weapons themselves be transferred, we do not transfer them, nor the united states does not transfer them by its allies. they're just and we're basically doing the same things they've been doing for decades. they have allies in certain countries and they are preparing their carriers, and they are being trained by the crew. we are going to do the same. this is exactly what alexander yuryevich asked for a big, of course, and important topic - this is your meeting with the head of china, many statements were made, many important news, but your words that you propose to trade in yuan not only between russia and china, but also third countries with other countries of the united states, of course, immediately considered this an attempt on the world reserve

currency for the dollar. encroaching? well no, that's not true. we mean we would use the dollar. they don't give us. and how can we make payments there in the currency that is acceptable to our trading partners, the yuan, one of these more that it is used by his imf means, uh, it is they who are sawing, the bough on which they are sitting. i have already spoken about this many times, limiting the use of the dollar, but based on, uh, 7 minute opportunistic considerations of a political nature. they are, uh, news to themselves. you can download the leg shoots, it's not us that's what they do. and of course. uh, here's the very fact that, let's say our gold reserves were frozen because of it. all the countries of the world assure you, at any rate, those that have yes, they all think how

reliable is, uh, the american partner and all done. that is unreliable, therefore , our partners agree with pleasure. uh, you know that the oil-producing countries of the middle east have said that they also want to carry out calculations in yan. well, we will gradually expand. this will expand those currencies that are reliable. yes, we understand that there are certain advantages of the dollar; today there are certain limitations. here uh, for those currencies that we use by not only the union, but also other currencies on but uh, each country is interested in strengthening its own national currency. and all countries will strive for this, so without any doubt. this is a huge mistake on the part of the american authorities, what they are doing,

limiting dollar settlements around the world in relation to those countries that they somehow do not like. well, in general, they closely followed your negotiations for such personal observation. on the first day of the visit there, and our groups somewhere earlier there at half past five in the evening were already at the exit from the first building of the kremlin because, well, the signals were intervening. rather, it seemed that the negotiations yours will be completed soon. and now it's dark. we stood for a long time and only at 21:00 we left in this way, so your informal part of the negotiations lasted more than four hours. maybe almost five, what you talked about for so long, even on the first day. well we had a working lunch. here, and then i invited e chairman. that is, move to another room. i have an apartment here, in which i have been spending a lot of

time lately, working here and spending the night very often , so we moved there and sat by the fireplace. and while drinking tea, they talked about everything slowly, but talked about the situation. e in world affairs, and in various aspects. uh, the presidents of the people's republic of china paid quite a lot of attention. uh, revealing the positive beginnings, uh, the chinese peace plan and the plan for a peaceful settlement of the situation in ukraine, by the way, saying hmm, on the very same day when he told me and showed me. e, argued, e, the positive aspects of the chinese plan for the settlement in ukraine by peaceful means. on the same day we learned about the deliveries. uh,

millions of shells to ukraine from uh, western countries from the arsonists of this conflict, and the next day, right before the meeting with the press, we learned about this story. uh, that the uk is going to supply shells with, uh, that means, combined uranium, as if hmm uh , western westerners did it on purpose in order to somehow interrupt our negotiations with or somehow influence them. i don't even know why, but i get the impression that it's been done. it was deliberate, by the way, here, uh, different approaches to the collective smell. more precisely, on the one hand, their aggressive territory and the supply of weapons and offers china's peace settlement on the other. okay, i don't want to dive into it right now, uh, we talked, of course, uh, during these four hours, uh, and here are the bilateral relations in all aspects, and first of all in the economic sphere and the main emphasis was placed on

this uh. china's russia naturally complement each other, bearing in mind the high pace of development of the chinese economy and the need for a carrier, of course, china needs. the most important thing is the stability of these deliveries, and of course russia is able to provide such stability. eh, here and not talking about the use of national currencies , by the way, if we don't use the yuan when selling energy resources, in which case we will use the yuan with third countries, this will be a very serious person, very seriously. and well, since we don’t really need the dollar. uh, imports are closed, so for us to cling to the dollar for our company, in principle, there is not much sense, but we will not rush anywhere in this regard, but uh with our chinese friend. of course, we talked a lot about this about the economic component.

our relationship. and we have a lot of directions. and of course, we will strive to ensure that the most promising high-tech industries. yes, we united our efforts, where each of us has certain e, high is good. yes, er, that means a well-developed level of competitiveness. yes, in global markets. e hmm, that's all. this was the subject of our uh, talk. uh, the topic was discussed, of course. well, they just sat by the fireplace and sang tea for four hours. the conversation must be said that the president of the people's republic of china is very interesting companion. he is deeply immersed in all the problems to give credit to world affairs and in the economy and his country and in our relations, he knows everything. he is well prepared. well, it was just interesting

to talk to him. in my opinion, we received mutual satisfaction from these conversations, you literally told us a few questions in ulan-ude about the important finding near the nord stream gas pipeline and, on the eve of the building , said that she had invited the nord stream operator company to be present at the lifting of this suspicious item. and gazprom was invited in general to this topic. there are some contacts and in your opinion. uh, well, in general , we will learn the truth from the west sometime about what happened, there is, uh, the hope that this will be a real investigation. uh, i think it will be difficult. it will be difficult to achieve. well, someday hmm probably will be revealed completely. what was done and how, although, uh, an american journalist who has become quite famous in the world now , he conducted such an investigation and came, as you know, to the conclusion that this explosion on gas pipelines was organized by the intelligence agencies of the united states of america, i

fully agree with such conclusions, uh, what has been happening lately is being examined, uh, having received permission from the danish authorities, since the explosion occurred in the exclusive economic zone. yes, in the zone of denmark, the survey went along the pipe a little higher and after 30 km found that at the junction of the pipes , fuck it, and these are the most vulnerable places in the same place 30 km away, and there was an explosion to the side and it will happen at the junction of two pipes. and i repeat the most vulnerable points. costs some object there. uh, it was all photographed and, uh, presented to our explosives experts. they think it might be an antenna to receive a signal, either from the air or from space, to initiate

an explosive device. and well, we er, having received this information in an honest way, as it should be. yes , they were sentenced with the danish authorities and suggested that they immediately, together with the involvement of international experts , examine this site. uh, assuming that another explosive device may be planted there, which, for some reason, does not exploded, well, we received such a streamlined answer that our services are not particularly needed. hmm. and if it is needed, then we will be informed about it someday. after that, as you know. and our representatives at the un have raised this issue for discussion. and just recently on thursday, i think we received a response from the danish authorities. uh where

is it said that uh? they examined. this item they believe that it is not explosive. i think they should have been more honest in saying that he is no longer explosive. if they examined her then they didn’t allow it, then we didn’t we know what happened there. here, uh, well, in any case, it was said that the nord stream organization itself, and it is the only one there, uh, a shareholder of gazprom, but it still reads us as an international organization, because it is registered in switzerland, they are ready to invite this organization, and services. uh, russian specialists are not needed. well, i think that now it makes no sense for us to get in there, since we have one of the countries. there in this case denmark said they had already examined. well, we've already examined it. means, it is no longer an explosive situation, but

for us, frankly speaking, and the point was not to convict someone of something, but to ensure safety, so that other explosions. well, if the danes say that this is no longer explosive, it would make sense to be one of the main international topics of recent days, it is not the fighting in france where they are protesting against the pension reform. you, as the president of a country that also had a pension reform a few years ago, you know how you perceive everything that is happening, first, it's their business. this is an internal affair of france, er, the first thing? well, of course, we understand everything, which means that many countries are carrying out reforms of this kind. well, i don't know those countries that don't. in the modern world, in developed economies, where life expectancy is growing, the number of pensioners is increasing. i just don’t know such countries, but probably they exist, but there are practically no such large countries, but

still, uh, what we did and as i see it, what is the difference between what is happening in france we have. well, first of all, uh we have kept a difference of 5 years between the retirement of a woman and men in france there is no such difference the same retirement age. this is the first. second, we have a long transitional period of 10 years. this is an essential way. er, well, reduces the burden on citizens. well, i think that the most important thing is that we have retained all preferential early retirement regimes. and in france, as far as i know? no, there are all these preferential early exit regimes liquidated. well, it's still me, but here it is citizens who perceive this approach. hmm , this approach is excessively harsh and unfair, because different

working conditions still require different approaches and from the point of view. uh, retirement. yes , so much so that hmm and here i am to this attitude exactly in this way. i understand that we have people, of course everyone remembers, no one has forgotten anything. eh, but i repeat once again what they do in other countries. it's their business. well, we 're looking at it from the side. we do not interfere with all these processes. it was an interview with vladimir putin to the russian media, now an advertisement, and then the latest data

about the situation in this area. all day on the legs and back tired on a daily basis, but how to protect the joints just one capsule a day to protect the joints and spine. autoteka makes buying a car on avito more transparent one accident damaged bumper repair amount 17000 information from insurance and car service find out the truth about accident repairs in

the autotete did you have such that paying online made you remember where your card is now the svp button no matter where it is, and paying for purchases is not only convenient, but also profitable payments without leaving your couch. benefit has never been so convenient. pay for purchases using the sbp button. partners have promotions and benefit. you croak. it's also that the interpreter is to blame. let’s better, i’ll transfer it to high-quality internet, beeline’s mobile internet has become two more reliable beeline on your side, pensioners can get special conditions, so some are already taking loans, others are happy with the interest on the deposit, what you need in the branch and online

sovcombank the age of your advantage. we give you another reason to rejoice and reduce the prices of your favorite products with discounts up to 50%. for example, two scooter wafer rolls for the price of one for only 46 rubles. scooter heart