[000:00:00;00] and crippled on the playing field. the main thing for us to win, we contacted our future hero. he turned out to be a former senator of the state of virginia and a real colonel of the american army , richard aidan black . that washington that is going into the world to the third world war and is trying with all its might to stop it, which is why they are ready to speak russian with us. the current us policy it is laid out in a very simple universal form, divide and

rule and richard black today will tell us how they manage to divide and rule and destroy poor, unfortunate ukraine. it is best to introduce me as senator black me. you can also call colonel black, depending on the situation. i am a retired colonel and a former virginia state senator. i was a pilot during the vietnam war , flew 269 sorties and fought on land with the 1st marine division. the leader of south vietnam, president zim, did not want american troops on his territory. country, he began peace negotiations with north vietnam, but there was a coup d'état, during

which the americans intervened at that time. for many years, president putin tried to avoid a final war. bottom line. he was forced to send troops into ukrainian territory after many years of unsuccessful attempts to prevent it . the united states is determined.

president yanukovych was duly elected , and the cia and mi6 carried out an operation to overthrow the legitimate government of ukraine in the state department. worked on this project. in particular. victoria nulond is a very high-ranking diplomat. she literally does it herself. she chose new members of the government who were to come to power as soon as president yanukovych left the country . it seems to me that the decision was made by people who are very profitable for such warriors, they decided to attack in the end. blatantly provoked by nato, they admitted that

they used the minsk peace accords to fraudulently prepare and build up the ukrainian army and then attack the border regions with russian speakers population. under president barack obama , a huge amount of weapons was delivered to ukraine , these weapons were then used to form a large army concentrated on the line of contact with the republics in the donbas. in the final analysis, the cia state department how? i think they want war with russia not sure what they know? what character, it

will acquire, but they think about it. it seems to me that the american government is well aware that the territory for which there is a struggle is the areas where traditionally russian people live - residents of crimea - it's the russians. they are not ukrainians. it so happened that they remained on the other side of the border, but they are russian people in the dpr and the lpr - these are also russians, they have russian culture, history, language everything they have is russian, and what is happening now is a struggle for where the border should go, but speech it's about russians, whose people the ukrainian government is trying to keep in their country are russian-speaking, the population is trying to return to russia to become part of it - they understand this, but they don't want

the american people to realize it. many decisions about wars are accepted by the globalist oligarchs. i call them the davos guys, it's not just about those who gather in davosin in switzerland to plan the future of the world. although they also belong to this group. this refers to the people who decide when countries start wars, and when there is no formally final opinion on this matter , the biden president expresses, but in fact the decision is made at a level above him by all the oligarchs of the globalists, the giant banking families that control the vast wealth of the world. they receive great benefit from the war.

the first thing that would have happened if russia had not crossed the border of the ukrainian army launched a massive attack on the republic of donbass , the armies of the dpr and lpr were very small and not very strong, probably, they would have been defeated in this case from a political point of view. russia would be forced to enter the war, no matter what, she would not have a new choice. at the same time, it is important to understand nato's plans in this regard nato wants to have nuclear missiles directly on the border with russia ukraine serves as a large buffer the zone between western europe and russia can be said to be a safety zone in case something goes wrong on one side or the other . it gives some breathing space for russia for nato so that they can call and talk about what is happening is extremely dangerous when nato nuclear weapons are located directly on the border with russia in such a situation, a decision

must be made immediately. and, of course, this is a danger for russia and for the whole world, because now everything is happening on autopilot. no time for human intervention. the machine is against the machine and there is no time to think, the most dangerous thing for western europe is to move nuclear weapons to ukraine, it is not only that russia is under threat because of nuclear weapons. nato does not understand. once they get rid of this buffer zone, western europe can be suddenly destroyed by hypersonic nuclear missiles in almost a few seconds. i don't think the people who planned it realized that if they were successful, if they succeeded ukraine's accession to nato they will sign the death warrant for all mankind,

not just for russia meet the narcissist the us does not defend its own borders. people are crossing our borders en masse, which are completely uncontrolled. and here we are, on the other side of the world. we are trying to decide for ourselves where the border between russia and ukraine should be held recently by the governor. ron desantis. asked about his attitude to the conflict , he is considered an alternative to former president donald trump in the next election. florida governor ron desantes categorically opposes the position that the majority of washington republicans have taken on the issue of ukraine landing. no, he's not not conservatives, who would have thought quoting the us should not provide assistance that could require the deployment of us troops

and allow ukraine to launch offensive operations beyond its borders, therefore f-16s and long-range missiles. should be out of the discussion, these actions are fraught with a clear involvement of the united states in conflicts and approaching us to a bloody war between the two largest nuclear powers of the world such a risk, unacceptable further, the landing force opposes the policy of change of power in moscow despite the popularity of this approach in washington and it indicates that the biden administration has created an alliance between russia and china . united states, we cannot prioritize intervening in an escalating war on foreign soil to defending our own homeland, especially since tens of thousands of americans die each year from drugs contraband smuggled across our open border. in addition, our arsenals of weapons

critical to our security are rapidly depleting. this is the position of the landing party, he explained everything. most likely, either trump or the desantes will become candidates from the republican party. today, they both openly declare that the war in ukraine is not in the life. in the important interests of the united states and that we should back down, we should not encourage it. and even before i walk into the oval office. i will settle a catastrophic war between russia and ukraine and it will take me no more than one day. even now, despite the huge human loss of destruction. i would make a peace deal within 24 hours gop. more and more opposed to the war. and now even some democrats have begun to move in this direction. on the eve of the election, i can’t say that public opinion in the united states is against the war in ukraine, but i can say that it

is moving towards condemning it, as time goes by , people begin to oppose the war more and more by the time of the presidential election. in 2024, i think a very strong resistance to the conflict in ukraine the american people may not understand all the nuances of the war very well, but the people who make the decision are officials in the state department in the cia pentagon. they realize that when we pump weapons into ukraine, this leads to huge losses among ukrainians. of course, a lot of russians die, too, but at such

a high level, the foreign policy establishment doesn’t care how many ukrainians die. they don’t care if they all die, they need a nato victory and don’t give a damn on normal human values, you are russian. i am an american patriot, we know how to sympathize when we see the destruction of human deaths, i can’t even say. how many times have i prayed for the killing of ukrainians and russians to stop, but there is a difference between us people who empathize and those who do not. who forms the foreign policy course in the state department. in london, who creates these wars, they don't care about the death of the bloodshed. it's shameful, but i'm afraid it's true. when the war started it was like a big sporting event? can our country

win or will the other one take over? all this was very reminiscent of a football match, when you choose your team and say, this is my team. this is yours for the american public. it almost looked like a big sports game, but gradually in the usa they begin to realize that the situation is much more serious, real people suffer and die mentally, the americans understood this before, but on an instinctive level for them it was like a game. this attitude is beginning to fade away , a video appeared on the network that did not work out. not from the side ukrainian authorities, it depicts the place where russian prisoners of war were taken. this is a very candid video a few

minutes long. it shows footage of heavily wounded soldiers lying on the ground. i remember there was one young man by age. he could be my son. he was seriously wounded with a shot through his legs , a ukrainian soldier passed by, he showed all these people and hit him in the legs. this man already received a serious wound in the leg, and he hit him again with a bag on his head. he couldn't breathe his hands tied behind back. there was no way he could take this bag off his head, and then the ukrainian took it off just to show the man's face. i looked at him so innocent. just a boy. just a boy, he didn't threaten anyone, and that's at the end of the video after they showed all these rows of people bleeding . a bus arrives with three prisoners of war without injuries. they get off the bus with their hands tied behind their backs , and without any

warning, a ukrainian soldier shoots them in the legs. aside the officers who are the first two people fall third beg, please don't shoot me, don't shoot, but they shoot and they shot him all in the legs to cripple him. naturally, when you shoot in the legs, you hit the veins of the artery of a person, just lying on the ground, probably most of them died on the spot. this is a very revealing video. the ukrainian authorities admitted that it was real, they said they would check it, but of course, nothing happened. and that's all, because there is a difference between the two authorities, one gets

the impression that the ukrainian side has taken at the same time, there is a feeling that russia is observing the rules of the law of custom of war, of course , crimes are committed by individuals on both sides, but it seems to me that ukrainians are doing little to keep the level of crime on their part more in one case, at the beginning of the conflict, a video appeared on the network, which was recognized by the ukrainian authorities. on it, the head of the hospital boasted that he had given clear instructions to all his doctors when russian prisoners of war were wounded. military personnel. they should castrate their instructions to all the men of the fire. because these are cockroaches, not people. and believe me, all the doctors who saved the life of a patient in russians will die here in large numbers for all the years that i was in military service. it started in 1963. i have not seen a more serious war crime. than

orders to castrate enemy prisoners of war given to doctors in the rear. ukraine admitted that they should look into this, but nothing more was heard about this case, while there is a big propaganda campaign about what the russian soldiers are doing, but in most cases such reports are based on speculation regarding the situation with drones. it shows once again how provocative and aggressive us policy has become, of course, the question arises of how close the drone was to russian airspace . but

i don't see russia sending its drones to the us coast. and for some reason we do it. why do we need to send military drones to the russian coastal zone. now is not the time to poke the other side with a stick in the eye, it is time to back off if the us were sincerely interested in avoiding war , there would certainly be no us military drones in this airspace during his recent interview with the newspaper. washington post. i said you see, these drones are from there, what are we doing there? this is stupidity, but such decisions are made, and they are made consciously, in order to bring nato and the united states closer to war, it is difficult to answer the question on the death toll in any large-scale war previously chaired. the european commission said that

100,000 ukrainians died during the conflict, this data was checked. it was about 5 months ago and it turned out that it is possible, it is really quite accurate information of 100,000 dead, then one document was leaked. it was a ukrainian secret document, which spoke about soldiers missing in action, this is not some short document, but a very detailed multi-page one. report. names were listed there. the location of 35,000 ukrainian soldiers missing in action is not clear to me. are these soldiers included in the 100,000 or is it an additional 35,000, in addition to the 100,000 that the head of the european commission spoke about, but at the moment. i think we know the level of casualties among ukrainians. simply astronomical now the combat situation has changed the russian army. there is an offensive. i think that the level of loss

among the russians has increased, it is very difficult to check. how many actually died. it seems to me that the number of deaths among ukrainians is still much higher than 100,000 people. who knows maybe 150.000. i do not know this, but it seems to me that the death toll on the russian side has increased. i don’t know how much specifically the loss of russia, i know for sure that there are more of them. i think that the level of losses, while still much lower than that of ukraine, but more accurate information. i can't give you. i think that russia would be happy to destroy weapons on the way to ukraine, but i'm not sure that russia always knows exactly when and where exactly these missile deliveries take place. the blows are not at all as devastating as it might seem in the video. if you look at the footage , you can see that everything exploded, it seems that everyone

died, everything was destroyed during the vietnam war. i supervised the launch of a huge number of bombs by all aircraft builders of the division for three months. i've dropped the most bombs of any aircraft manufacturer , it's amazing how often people survive bombings like this. sometimes equipment is saved. that is, it is not always so easy to say, let's define the goal of a thousand kilometers from us and destroyed it, they believe that russia is doing a very good job of delivering weapons. to ukraine they destroyed a huge amount of protective equipment of tanks, armored personnel carriers, a huge number of howitzers of aircraft, but it is difficult to stop absolutely all the flows of weapons in ukraine. good question. at the moment, we see that chinese president

xi jinping is leading the negotiation process. i think that the united states will allow ukraine to sit down at the negotiating table if there is a combination of several factors, and it is ukraine's failures on the battlefield and changes in public sentiment in the us and in europe that public opinion about ukraine can change in the us, the fact that we are now approaching a presidential election. it will only accelerate these changes, because now there are candidates for the post of president who express their opinion. they say, i think it must be the way they feel the american public. the population is very concerned about the state of the economy and the amount of money that is sent to ukraine for the military needs, that is, the state of affairs of washington in

london will be able to change the political pressure then peace talks. in ukraine, they will become more serious. i have a completely different outlook. me and joe biden. we live on different planets in life. i didn't make many political decisions that i would like to change. i always review them, always think about what i did and the decisions i made, but my worldview is different from the worldview of president joe biden and the thinking of many other politicians. i always approached all issues comprehensively, it is important to understand how the russians, ukrainians, germans, french, americans look at the situation, but if you can’t. put it all together in your head at the same time. you will not be able to make an intelligent decision. it seems to me that this is now very lacking, the mistake of our

government is that we look at the situation superficially. we look at it only from our point of view, when we destroy nord stream gas pipelines , we sabotage and undermine them, we do not consider this situation from the point of view germans and french people who depend on gas from russia, we thoughtlessly make huge strategic mistakes. it all started with george w. bush, president of the republican party, when he unleashed all the wars in the middle east. saddam hussein. this is a threat to americans, a threat to neighbors. he is also a threat to the iraqis themselves. i think that next week all the speculation about the last ultimatums will end we are doing everything to avoid war, however, if adam does not collapse. satisfied, we will disarm it by force, different people have different thinking, i think what you need to think, like a chess player , to predict and think about what

the player on the other side of the chessboard sees about who is most responsible for all the deaths. i would start with president barack obama, he decided to overthrow the government of ukraine in 2014 , the war against the dnr and lnr. unleashed by president obama when he was still at the helm. i would say that he bears a huge responsibility for the scale of losses and destruction, i think that president biden is in second place in terms of responsibility. do you remember when trump ran for president. he wanted to cut our involvement in nato depth of state with various government bureaucrats. we worked together to undermine his position and reduce his influence. thank you for the interview, of course, i pray for

the war to end pray for you all russians and also for the people in ukraine i hope the war ends soon. we received these shots from kiev there in the refectory church, kiev-pechora, laurels, schismatics held their first divine service. and the crosses on the domes at this time turned black this can be treated differently, but it is a fact that

cannot be denied. all the best.

alexander gitsenko now could save only

the soviet people fish others are not here putin's big interview sensational news,