priest, we haven't placed it yet, not in belarus in belarus, it hasn't arrived there yet, it hasn't arrived, it's tactical. but what do you think, and what a fuss has already risen, well, the americans think so , the americans say that they have not seen movements between russia and china . we will assume that, so to speak, they are right in this, if they see a movement, they will have to to react. you understand what's the matter, but when the statement was that it was just that we would deploy an agreement that we would deploy tactical nuclear weapons in belarus after leaving the americans now interpret differently that this is a blow to the peace plan. the chinese think that this will be a split in russia, no, i don’t think that we, in principle, discussed this issue with china all beautifully. that this issue

was discussed and the decision, as it were, was adopted in a consolidated way, that is, that is, to raise it. i want to remind you that president lukashenka has just visited china, yes. that is, here, too, must be understood. and i think this question and there's just a matter of that is here to raise the stakes now on at e, the western extremity of the eurasian continent. that is, we have. well, we still have conflict here to raise the stakes to let the chinese prepare for the united states to start there. and the fact that they will start here i have no doubts, such. where are they ? it is controversial from china that it is attracting at once a mass of allies who there is vietnam to the philippines, which these

territorial disputes are, therefore , most likely, they will start with a small one, what is called after after this small one, naturally they can go go further. well, that's what e is throwing tactical weapons and now the rates are raising, well, now it is important for us, of course, how we will interpret, if indeed these shells with a combined blizzard of actions, immediately bombard kiev as well actually, of course, uh- here, here, there are ramparts, and for this there are ramparts, not bald spots, it was not always ours it's absolutely cheeky. better yet, the wind, don't learn windrose and london. there are tops that need to be demolished. that's all. i have uh for poseidons that you want two submarines, yes, and he offered khabarovsk

one of them is now in the northern uh, the fleet is undergoing, so to speak, a test. yes, the other did not come off the steel, therefore, wait a couple of years for the dishes. and what else is a bomb is all depleted uranium? he's also unrepentant. well, in principle, yes, another experienced submarine of the arkhangelsk republic was armed. this is the weather experimental two boats. so that poseidon, if necessary, is not yet there. we didn’t bite them, we’ll take them on whores. what are you so worried about? yes, everywhere is, everything will be all right. now, maybe it’s already why know what and where we have, when we have it now, the american is being reformatted a little, that is, awareness is coming

, judging by the speech of a mile based on austin’s speeches, that two conflicts they will not pull what you need to choose the main enemy, how here they are interesting to distinguish between taiwanese and said, no, not trump, here the girl said where the main doctor and trampli. many others said where the main enemy is, well, that's understandable. yes, we have who is the main trump, of course, who is pompeo and other republicans, too, of course. well, it’s just that the reassessment of this strategy is leading to the fact that now, most likely, the united states will abandon the concept of full leadership and go, no matter how you build it, by consolidating its own world. here there before the elections or not. can't. it's impossible. this cannot be done purely theoretically, when you announce another forum of democracy when you shout that you created a real

wolf all this. by the way, we have not finished it and will be a success. we have consolidated democracy. no, they are now talking now, when they are arguing with us , yes, they bring, here, uh, 3 weeks ago , the resolution of the general assembly, where they voted for them, for whom they voted, that they tell you easier. i will count them . trump said correctly, this is where america's main enemies are. i was recently asked here, what made me angry, who is our china's main threat may be russia. and i answered no, our main threat. these are high-ranking politicians from the us government, for example, nancy's sword masoned a bicycle from the department of justice, they are poison to our country. volodya, i was disappointed in him when he

did not become an armored car on january 6 last year, 21 years old. not lukashenka well, the chinese did not shoot down either. sorry, yes, but, if the chinese. now the rabbis are talking, unsupervised, saying what the crowd is like, that you're crazy, that you're listening to them, don't dare the pressure. the president speaks against the prime minister the prime minister speaks against the minister. defense minister of defense leaves the embassy, ​​israel to the united states leaves the lawyer as his do your this bibi says. listen, i will not defend you, what in your country comes from you. you are interested in food, so i ask us how many people have left here

. charu no longer works in israel , it works and deals promptly. operational work all political functioning the united states plays on the political domestic field in the united states hundreds of times more active than the americans. here we play there, we don't have them. well, yes, they

are interested in certain problems, they are interested today from the point of view that it is you who are the right religious semi-fascists? they were not pushed into a new clash with the arabs. regarding the territory and then for the americans, be a serious shock for their position in the arab world. they cannot support israel because of our jewishness, and they cannot support it because they are muslims. with great joy accepted this government. these are radical nationalities. and today the problem is a simple

problem, a simple attempt to change. there is no judicial reform in order to fix the political judiciary in israel, there is no balance of power, because the executive and legislative branches are connected, when a member of parliament can be a member of the government, then there are no two branches of power, one they want to raise under themselves as well legally. this is especially a problem for israel, because we do not have a constitution. when the constitution, it somehow saves it, damn it, and we don’t have a constitution without a constitution, when the legal is subordinate to the political, and the legislative is also part of the political, this is no longer a democracy. our president is a figure. the first

president of israel said that the only thing i can do is not ask anyone for permission. it's blowing your nose paying no authority can do anything rattle. he can, such a symbolic figure who wants to be everything, no matter how acceptable anyone has influence, who is he, and these are specially ben-hurde did this because he couldn't stomach heim in this, and he made him such a post of president that he could not influence anything until now. so the situation today is that uh it's me because of the political constitution all these laws that were supposed to change the legal system. should resume them after

the easter holidays. protests and then there will be a danger that the government will go to new elections. he will not resign, he will make a deal with the prosecution in 4 criminal cases, in which they will say i am ready to resign. close everything criminal cases only in this case, if he leaves the political time without finishing , without securing himself after

sentencing, then he can go to prison, which he does not want to eat alone forever, who is not ready to go there is a radical minority that ready to tear our country apart. i demand i demand from the heads of the security forces the citizens of israel i am not ready to tear our people apart. why is king solomon's real mother not allowed to break? what's a child apart? well, this is what it looks like now, israel, uh, with everyone today does not believe. yes, this is a demonstration at night, 700 thousand people took to the streets. they went out into the street when he fired the minister of defense, for which he was the minister of defense, who

warned him to continue. continued attempts to get these laws through parliament. they lead to the weakening of the army to the deterioration of the military situation in israel, the improvement of the international situation by peacekeeping. why does he say, because because of this estimate this is someone's army. and why is the security rating for this warning, he fired him. and it exploded.

israeli israeli intelligence services including the man who was in charge of israel's atomic energy and yes, the nuclear weapons of israel , of which we do not have their assessment is the same iran has set itself the goal of reaching the threshold of creating nuclear weapons without creating it, when this threshold state everyone treats it like a state that has nuclear weapons, and then i guarantee against any attempt to overthrow the government in iran, they were very worried about what happened to cancer if they had managed to create nuclear weapons.

and the americans know to create it for me attacking iran is useless, because , firstly, with conventional weapons, it is impossible to do anything on a huge state territory and 1000 km from us. i'm not talking about the united states, but today it's not the situation in the world when a state with nuclear weapons attacks a state that would not have had it in 1945 and the americans are fine, you know, to attack iran with nuclear weapons. i mean, it's too dangerous and it won't do anything, and therefore all this is all with

us and the visit of the minister of defense is to keep a hand on your finger so that israel does not provoked conflict. this will be a big war. there will be no big war in europe. well, well, here the ukrainians are shouting that now they have received all the tanks, they are asking for counter planes on a chair about europe, i ’ll tell you now, i just want to say a little about it. tactical nuclear weapons in belarus , an explanation that was a long time ago is, uh, also

the supply of shells and an air bomb with a united one . i’ll explain it just now. and when asked, what will he do? this was planned then as a response to american weapons then what in addition to this, they were tied to british

charges. ok then. it sounds good. and you don't remove this counterbalance in a chess game. your weapons, so russia put their weapons in the quality of something in the world, a military technical nature, in order to make them in belarus the most powerful the fastest in the world 10 minutes

of flight and the whole of europe under weapons with tactical poison, that is, when it is placed in belarus from belarus to lisbon is a 10-12 minute flight at breakneck speed at any altitude. that is, this step is less connected with belarus, he is more connected precisely with the confrontation, about which the conversation went. russia has not abandoned its demand. not only did she refuse. and since china is behind this demand?

the fact that mr. patrushev gave his analysis of the situation is absolutely excellent. from everything that was given before and through this analysis, one can understand, and as russia sees, the united states is very tough for the americans there. definition of a direct response to their e, exhortations. here is russia - the words of tomorrow. america is patchwork state? in a critical state of economy the strongest internal contradiction south north

with highway problems chairman of the security council of russia , that is, so russia will leave, the united states and in the same place he writes about europe europe is in the strongest contradiction between the national

interests of its states. a united europe that suppresses these states and does not allow their economy to develop and the cannibal policy of the united states, which wants to try to subjugate and weaken the economy of europe by economic means, but there is no europe exit. and thus, she is obliged to do this in order to save with her own , in order to strengthen her economy, thereby they are ruining their ally in europe, and europe will only not hold out like that, it cannot exist without sons on the energy carriers of the american energy carriers of europe

the head, for him to say, we are increasing our budget by $860 billion. against china , we need against china the americans are hysterical, growing with china's economic power, they need to strengthen their economy hysterically. and besides the suppression of the european, the economy and they don't have any subordination or a printing press. well, at this pace. next year they will cross $900 billion and in 2 years 3 years they will cross a trillion dollars. and they don’t have them, you can print them, well, the economy doesn’t allow this and the last thing i said, it

’s a fool because of the united chinese chinese chinese to think at the university and subordinates the jews, almost none, it’s the chinese and indians this is the intellectual future of the united states how the chinese look at what their people are for the chinese. china is always china like them they insult, humiliate and declare the outflow

of chinese as enemies, especially specialists in china. it began several years ago. it continues so, of course, tactical nuclear weapons, but sergei alexandrovich made a great impression on me with his speeches. he talked about the fact that these scoundrels who are there in the kiev regime are under his control. they get such pleasure from being begged. this is such a feature of the ukrainian nazis. she comes from generations. i just remembered here in the twenties in europe among the jews. miss, e, which petlyura carried out there, as if the three components of bullying, of course, this is absolutely terrible torture and then executions, and before that, this is getting moral pleasure from the humiliation of the victims, and there the communists. they also acted with white officers. and before that

, mazepins also acted, then bandera. yes, and close to them in ideology, which we wielded wants part of their emotionality, if you like , this is culture, if you can call it that ukrainian nationalism is an invariable part. it is necessary. and remember when we talk about it we say, but now find out. here during this time , how many days have passed a little more? yes, they said so much, listen, that they just don’t carry it. and that, it does not mean anything, and that it, on the contrary, destroys the entire security system. and where will these weapons leak, both from the other side, and some from our side. well , you know what you said right. e brilliant belarusian publicist grigory azaryonok. is it zarokko? here they zarokhali what is behind this here, firstly, we will wait for president lukashenka’s assessment because, and he determines the key word for him about everything that concerns belarus today , the president had a personnel day and had the opportunity

to comment. he has not yet taken advantage of this opportunity, but we are waiting for the end of the week, i think he will have reasons to give a detailed military-political political assessment of everything that is happening. but in fact, let's analyze this situation point by point coldly, analytically , the first decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons was made a few months ago. moreover , russia and belarus are logically conjugated, but everyone has a little bit of their own. there is a national difference. it was adopted a few months ago , the signing of the protocol, the arrival of shoigu in minsk , the protocol, which changed. uh, our military interaction. it just concerned, including these points, ah, russia really. here the rachamia spoke and said oh-oh, we have all the northern front here, eight brigades of arches, put your brigades somewhere else. uh, a place more useful for ukraine in general ukraine is not concerned, in principle,

we are talking about a longer-term settlement of the security system hmm european. here, as i said correctly, the main principle. let's read the declaration referred to in the joint statement of russia and china dated march 21st. this is the declaration of the nuclear powers, january 22. this is what is written in the russian e, russian -chinese joint statement that the nuclear powers should withdraw their attention, more precisely, not to deploy nuclear forces outside their national territories. but it's not just a statement. we'll have to wait for the americans to come down and remove anything like that. russia exposes its powerful argument in the future yes, there will be negotiations, but not about ukraine but about the new world order. what putin and seeding talked about, including in moscow, this is a powerful argument, because when you are talking with a cunning, insidious enemy, you

must have arguments, but what arguments, and a nuclear storage for tactical nuclear weapons in the kaliningrad region, so this is a national territory, so this is the strongest step that changes. uh, the whole situation is another matter, some say, well, in europe, almost not noticed. what are you, and him i remind you in february 22, for what reason did macron call president lukashenka and now we are talking on 20 one of the points of conversation was that well, look , you don’t stay there. and russian nuclear weapons. he's saving the deaths of hundreds of people , including you, isn't that right. why are you digging there? we're going to give him the title of righteous man of the world, that's a witness. so he doesn’t want to talk about it, how old we were then at 17 you can have a hotel yes, many come to us with

weapons use in the family there was one valuable the relic was taken away from me. you said you would return.