i am convinced that this computerized introduction is primarily necessary for the americans , the current status does not suit them, so this does not mean at all that this counteroffensive should be large-scale there, i don’t know for the entire width of the front and so on. no they want any any tactical success. at this stage, it is extremely important for them. why do they need it? it would seem, well, from a military point of view. as you rightly said, even if there is some kind of tactical success, this will not solve it. ah, the outcome of the war. it is obvious that they have a different calculation. they consider what if in some particular area, but a substantially successful counter- offensive. this should provoke certain political processes in the russian federation, everything is directed exclusively towards this, both war and work. uh, american intelligence agencies and the fifth column and that's it. here are all the aggregates. it should be one effect. i'm sure they do not count, as in the ancients, well, russia is powerful in terms of and so

on there are nuclear weapons, they do not expect to defeat russia by way. uh, exclusively fighting. it's such a set of certain measures that should provoke processes within russia itself, which should, so to speak, uh, connect to uh, to all those, uh, let's say, measures worked out by the americans that they would not want to implement on the territory of russia, taking into account, approaching and of course e election campaign. they owe it to whom they are not americans. no. here they need these processes. they must, they must provoke a certain part of russian society. and yes, they owe someone. they should provoke, to whom there are problems with this wording, it turns out that russian society does not believe that someone thinks something to them, because they are goats. i don't know just explain goats, but they don't think so. they believe that

having a beard does not make a goat a rabbi. i agree, we will not argue. i agree in this regard, but they have a certain calculation. i'm not saying that all the calculations of the americans are all the goals that they set for themselves, they did not achieve them, but they set certain goals and ukraine must fulfill certain certain, so to speak, certain obligations that they have for the americans. that's how they decided and it will be therefore, to say that there will be no counteroffensive. i absolutely don't believe it. i am convinced that it will be and just a couple of days ago , zelensky. well, i don't know, in my opinion, we have already discussed this topic here not by chance. he initiated or announced, uh, the creation of three civil military administrations in the lugansk region. this is gorskaya popasnaya and uh, severodonetsk well, i don't know about popasnye. i'll just remind viewers.

this is a city that is completely destroyed, it is completely destroyed so much that, for example, in the lpr they decided to exclude this city as a city of regional significance, because who is the governor general of kiev but fled to poland, yes, he fled, that is we have a governor-general of kiev, who it seems to me, it’s time for us to appoint you had one governor, vladimir the she-wolf was collecting, but, unfortunately, he even yes, maybe it’s just there to say that but the governor-general of kiev will. is that zelensky appointing someone? yes, it's better we start appointing, of course, i'm from rusyn. we have with the rusyns. everything is fine. we have decided. yes, of course , strategically, let's say, uh, the lugansk direction, it is probably less interested in the west, but they are more interested in implementation. here is the idea that we often

discussed in your studio - it is to cut off the land corridor to the crimea - this is melitopol and , uh, berdyansk, that is, the exit to the sea of ​​\u200b\u200bazov. well, here, uh, the americans also need to monitor. e with the situation they claim that in fact, russia has strengthened so much in this direction. eh, the defense of what, well , let's say, so small forces, this result will be achieved. well, almost impossible , almost impossible, so i say it again. i am sure that it will be, where it will be, most likely, they will look , as usual, somewhere for the weakest point and hit exactly at this point in order to demonstrate at least some kind of success speak. oh-oh-oh, why is there still success at this stage, when we talk about arms deliveries and so on, we look oh, you show up with plots. e that europe is tired of ukraine and so on. this also has a place to be and this also needs to

be neutralized with something. and how can this not be cut off, of course, by a certain tactical success in order for mr. biden to say. look, lord of the europeans. we invested a certain financial resource with you. we provided them with weapons, there is a result and we must continue to do so. this war must go on if it's a great day for the ukrainian offensive circuit, the first ranks of the ukrainian counter-offensive to launch a striking force. what, for example, well , for example, all the comedians who have settled in israel are russian. well, galkina. he drowns the singers with his mouth for ukraine, so vladimir vladimirovich is right here to collect them all and powerful columns. prove love is impossible for ukraine why explain anything hard? how is the situation today in israel in london in paris each civilized

country? there is a bangnut, here, let them all fight there. or maybe the subtle plan of our foreign intelligence has finally become clear, maybe maxim galkin will finally get a different title, but it seems to me that he feels very comfortable in this nature of red security. such an explosive collective banking crises and wars are an integral part

of the capitalist system. she. you understand, i will not continue this thought, therefore a marxist. yes it's good. we are all artists at heart at heart. yes, please thank him longer. i would like to draw the attention of colleagues to the date that vladimir putin spoke about, after all, this one, after all, this one the thought haunts me, because july 1 is the date on which the transfer of russian nuclear weapons to the territory of belarus is scheduled, uh, c. special equipment burial. after all, this date could have been accelerated, given that the territory of belarus has preserved the soviet nuclear infrastructure , moreover, it was possible to build up strategic offensives there. there are mines there where offensive icbms are located. but our supreme commander is not yet talking about this out loud, but i think everyone there has guessed it. here's an option too may develop further, but the most important thing is that july 1 is the date that was announced, just

for our former european partners. it is they who must realize for themselves that on july 1, either the military-technical and political support for the ukrainian case will end on their part, or russia will acquire the very nuclear sovereignty that it had in soviet times. russia is expanding its nuclear competencies beyond its international territories and gives opportunity, and not a nuclear state, which does not have any bilateral agreements with nato while to have tactical nuclear weapons on their balance sheet with the use of an object on balance with their territory, potentially hitting almost all of eastern europe yes partially western northern even considering that some are tactical. passes, and they will be applied, if belarus is up to about 500 kilometers, the time comes

for missiles already of short and medium range. i would like to note that this head start, which gives the president of russia, is 3 months. it's april. may june should suffice, i guess. uh, this foreign policy message to ensure that they realize not just the threat, but the existential threat of nuclear destruction, which is now hanging over the leaders of europe , of course, the british and americans, as always, are already sitting in a big puddle. and here again, this is the continuation of the discussion, and shells with a combined wound fit perfectly into this plane. and now, general kirillov , i will remind you of this, i will also remind you. he is just the inhabitants of europe. what will happen if british ammunition is shot at a training ground under the name of the former ukraine and where and all this radioactive fund was caught both in the black sea and in the countries. waste europe of the balkan basin, well, of course, russia

from the ukrainian territory, if ukraine has retained at least some kind of unitarity. er, they will also be affected and infected. that is, well, as always, britain smiles and waves behind a large puddle. it will cool down and touch, but america will not touch. and here is this very good move, which, in principle, well, why hide the fact that we could not say about it earlier or alexandra grigoryevich could not earlier, i asked to go home for a long time back in july last year, and i remember special exercises were conducted with the e-air force components of the belarusian air force there is just a su-27 su-30 and a promising day, 35 of which can be carried, just tactical nuclear weapons and rise from airfields belarus, and now, in my opinion, there is a shadow diction that we do not see, it is closed to the information space between the leaders of europe and washington, there are frantic consultations. of course they are so hidden, but shaking with fear, the leader of europe they say

you understand that moscow is one thing that is connected by the bailey incident in general by the very fact of this term with nato as two such nuclear forces, the largest on the planet. and what exactly is belarus with nuclear weapons? and we can definitely negotiate with minsk in short, there is a channel of strategic communication with minsk and yours does not pick up the phone. yes, we tried to call. that is, she says, there is also a national youth, do not pick up this tube and leave it ringing for many more hours in her office. that is here i would just like to suggest. well , food for thought for our european listeners, isn't it time to demand the electorate of european voters from their leaders at least an answer to the question. and what will we do after the first of july, when nuclear weapons will be deployed from the territory of belarus and when, well , any rude word addressed to minsk maybe lukashenka will turn into such a serious reaction and in general

the whole discussion about the fact that soon poland or the baltic countries will happen what - some military technical actions in relation to boundaries. belarus is generally not aware of this at all now, they threaten to conquer belarus, lukashenka found he can answer 10 minutes and no, warsaw and even and even and even faster, given that the border is very decisions. yes, that's why i want to do it again . remind the european partners by the former partner that the partnership can still hypothetically be renewed if we do not switch to nuclear weapons, that is , maybe in the next generation of politicians they will be formed to ask for forgiveness, pay reparations for nord stream, and so on donbass will be restored at their own expense, and then perhaps russia with a mission. there is no more to speak in a normal human language. but with these leaders. he has no right to speak on behalf of the french people, he has betrayed the french. this nonentity

must go, swept away by the revolution, with whom he speaks scholtsev, who has begun a gigantic strike, he speaks. with a sunak who didn't vote for even his own chair, the first prime minister to set an example, it's not at all clear how anyone will sweep away these weak, helpless leaders. he doesn't have voted own chair. i mean, not a medical indication for the delivery of a chair is the table on which he theoretically sits. yes, this is probably the only thing that is solid in the whole character - this is his chair. yes, we do not know any. well, yes, and the most important thing is to force britain and france to remind these gentlemen that without including their nuclear potentials in start-4 , there is no talk of continuing strategic dialogue, and there can be no talk of nuclear expressions, so once again with the new leaders of these countries . i think old people registering leaders. well

, a year later, which countries says that you say one franz, one germany, nikolai platonovich is correct. and why should we save the united states once again, their unity is easier for us to negotiate with free thas, after a year of freedom, the land is completely torn off from mexico. we must return to our native shores. no why should we even talk to these obscure entities that have no right to be called strange, they do not fulfill the will of their people, self-proclaimed, united states well, of course, it is not clear by whom. well didn't even announce it. why should we talk to some kind of spain why should we not recognize the will of the peoples inhabiting this country who want independence why should we look at some kind of great britain what kind of spit is this in the history of freedom yes , of course, national pride should be brought down.

well, i do not believe that the british have something to say, but they will speak for them and decided and not only scotland northern ireland northern ireland should unite. where are they? how long can this tragedy last the division of the irish people, so we must, of course, repeat again. hmm i believe that the sultanate of berlin emirate of paris is a bikhanate. london well the khanate of london should send their ambassadors and we will look at them and maybe elite charters. and if to someone the scenario seems to be completely phantasmological. well, wait a few years and see the americans in 2008. same. if you look at the map of europe at that time , too, would show to many that what will happen in the ninety-eighth, this cannot be what it is absolutely nothing. well, interesting times are ahead of us.

well, it seems to me that western leaders have nothing to talk about, and there is no need . for the simple reason that the decision of this international court in the hague seemed like they did not want to negotiate at all, so there is no point in negotiating. no more next. as you say their leaders, they will only get worse treatment in that they degenerate, that is, there work, principle, negative selection. that is, when each next ruler turns out to be worse than the previous one, so i think we need this decision in the hague, it clearly showed the most recent liberal. uh, in russia there, uh , the so-called parties of negotiations that no one wants to talk, and i think that this decision will somehow sober up, and it is being prepared purely. just to e another method of conducting some kind of communication. if we return to the counteroffensive. today there was a journal written about the ukrainian counter-offensive. this will be the formula. e, he himself

is unknown by many, that is, there is already being questioned, in principle, success is adventures, then a logical question. and why zelensky there are zaluzhny podolak constantly. here they announce this offensive, they call it the place and dates, almost already there is something there in the next month or week there. look how beautiful five tanks are. yes, yes, i, like, are already winning. interestingly, we are on our own 1,600 tanks, which we will produce in the meantime until we get 400, which they have to put up, they boast of five tanks. 1.600 for the time when those put 4 there is no such minister of defense. we have different equipment, but they are in reznikov's problems in tanks and ours calmly said, while those 400 will drive them up. we will produce 1.600. there is a difference

, zelensky knows how to read, this is constantly announced by his entourage. and everything, it seems to me, is very simple , the fact is that these are people who were engaged in show business who came out of television, and there it is customary to announce every series every film. yes pops up announcements there doing some kind of teaser promo video. here they are too, therefore they announce their contour offensive. i think it's purely related to this, information wars of disinformation, of course, and now, naturally, ukraine will have another wave of mobilization. it's already announced under the pretext of placement. this one. and nuclear. technical weapons in belarus he said that eight more brigades were needed and reassembled. i don't know how these eight brigades will, uh, prevent this . here are the nuclear weapons from belarus, how they will catch you with glasses there. if anything, for example, well, in general, at least. now they have a certain excuse on the floor and on the ground. here you say that there it will be infected. she will be useless

and in the case of using these e, shells with uranium tips. so he has few statistics that today 40% of the former sown areas in ukraine are mined at all, that is , experts are already predicting that the harvest will be half as much as before last year, and the wildness is in the fact that the situation with working hands is physically very difficult there. one head of the farmer's association spoke here. he said, do you think they are now teaching these multifunctional combines john dir uh, tractor drivers of women because there are no men, that is, uh, well, in general, we can come to the conclusion that threatening, maybe there won’t be , and there won’t be anyone to collect it and then, accordingly, there won’t be and sell in within the framework of this so-called grain deal, so the situation is bad not only militarily, but also economically, financially and socially, mind you, right? the year

of the war is over, and in russia life expectancy has grown like never before yes, by more than two years, but in ukraine there are no such statistics. what is the mortality rate for ukraine for this big shoulder is not only the military, because it will immediately become. it is clear how zelensky’s authorities are lying in terms of the number of people who, in terms of the number of even funerals in different regions, and unfortunately, even this weekend showed that there are more and more people in western ukraine in the khmelnytsky region, even western ukraine is not.

so, well, that is, in the last way. and here, unfortunately, even without a war, the number of deaths in ukraine is also increasing, so therefore, indeed, who will be who? i don't know who will clean up. i i don’t understand at all who will sit now. for example, i would like to speak today, and speaking about ukraine, for example, i would like to say that they have been transferred to ukraine. uh, an hour, yes, time for summer time, but they announced that the heating season is over, because the temperature has become there in kiev, for example, now it's plus 13. well, it's out. here's the good news. let's say the news has nothing to do with people's lives, and not because let's say the war has a military component - this is

very important. that's what i think to do remembered it means that yesterday the security service of ukraine posted a material on its website that they had shut down a corruption scheme, just regarding the grain deal. i will not tell you what and how? well, the essence is the veterinary service, which must give a certificate that the quality of the grain corresponds , and these guys organized exactly the scheme in odessa, please, that is, for so much money. we give you a certificate. if not, then it doesn't. the sbu came out on its own. well, we know how i am in ukraine is being done. why do i understand? volodya herself the grain deal is a terrible corruption, because even the people who sell grain to european countries. they may not get the currency because offshore companies go there. this is the first, therefore, money to ukrainian companies. no, they don’t fit, the second is these schemes to sell grain in order to

withdraw, that is, corruption drives corruption. and uh, the fact that the territory is mined. this is a fact, therefore, and even in my opinion, either volo a, yes, someone was from kherson or someone was visiting you. i'm with him talked. yes, he says, and how will people go. uh, well, tractor drivers go tell the network how to go daddy land. she says how are we going to plow? there are also mines, first you need to exchange the territory. so it is already on these in these territories. i would also like to, but let's say this is a problem that concerns people, but here you have shown two people. i'd like to comment on mister nipples for years as an economist. he talks a lot, and i would be silent if last year, about a year ago, the month of may, he jumped out of the salt studio and said one thing. it's all nonsense. america won't help. we need one thing, we need the creation of a new

union of britain postman increase, and we once the second britain will give us science fiction third britain will give us weapons and we will fight against russia this guy said it all. what suddenly he will throw now. on another topic, that zelensky is bad, and so on. eh, you just have to share always. here we are, let's say there is no doubt. but you showed the politician, uh, suzan uh, chaputov of the president of slovakia. i know a little about the alignment in slovakia rusyns live there too. that's what made it the president you showed. she publicly says that slovakia can no longer help ukraine once and the population of the dog will not support or is critical, but the critical mass of people who do not support, and indeed she is right, i have a question for her. and why did she make a decision and handed over to ukraine e aircraft, but russian-made ones. why does she law her for it, why else does she

do it? you know what she violated, you understand, the germans give other tanks to the leopards as ordered. wait volodya you understand what's the matter, so we remember the story. we remember the history of slovakia when they attacked poland, if we remember that two countries attacked, she is trying all the time. that is, i don’t understand if people don’t have historical memory, they don’t understand that you don’t have to be like these, you know, but we also woof and here is the plane. why do i need planes for you, firstly, they won’t help, after all, in an impudent face it’s necessary there that they attacked poland on september 1, 39. it's just that 5 1/2, well, a maximum of 6 million people live there, because many ukrainians go there fled. and this is the state, especially the woman. you know, she says that it's already bad. so. if it’s bad that you are urging the war on, why are you

adding kerosene there? i don't understand this kind of politics, what a mess and in general, how like how the state today and in the end, you know, i would uh? but in war and peace, i still, when i was tolstoy when you say volodya that spiridon is also falling, there will definitely be a counteroffensive, zelensky will definitely twist his arms, and so on. here, here imagine the situation. here is a dear expert well, here i caught it, but an attack on ukraine and if there is an attack by ukraine, if there is such a thing, yes, but belarus from the territory of belarus i'm not talking about nuclear weapons. i'm talking about certain components. perhaps a threat to ukraine on the first of july. no, no, it is impossible for the ukrainian side to publicly declare that on the territory of belarus, according to their official ones. yes, that intelligence remained no more than 3,000 russian soldiers you will receive. i'm such fools, you know what i'm talking about,

you know the situation, any politician looks like you choose, huh? or against, depending on the circumstances. there are circumstances that now seem to me that the fact that zelensky is a war criminal is already a fact, and the death of the top ten. you may be hundreds of thousands of citizens of ukraine in his hands, but maybe he has a chance now in one second, maybe he has a chance now to take advantage of that moment. i urge you not to send tens of thousands of ukrainian servicemen to this massacre, because it is pointless from any geopolitical military meaningless. it's a massacre he doesn't have, that's all, see you tomorrow. in a great country, and it is true of the cruel upheavals of the death of thousands

of people, the state was going, well, into a single system of a rigid system of government. ussr we are building a new world and a new man but it is a memory. and for me and for you one will win, we need a victory of any color.

far eastern media tycoon oleg sidimka was killed in 2002 by several glasses on the stairwell of millions of dollars already, then everyone was sure that it was a high-profile crime, the work of gangsters from the trifonov group, and only now it became known exactly those who could be involved in the murder - this is igor kovalchuk