average americans and not worse to solve the problem that started this operation. this operation is within the framework of what we have always talked about returning the united states and the deployment of the troops of the united states and nato by the ninety -seventh year, with only one clarification, removing american nuclear weapons bases from europe . americans lose the election do not lose. i think what's going on and what he said and biden's behavior. the fact that patrushev wrote his what is patchwork state collapse? because

this situation, which was after the brest peace, will not return. lenin hoped for her. it worked for the second time, don't worry about it, kids, you just need to win no matter what happens to the united states. and victory is in the hands of the russian army. you like, yes i just one moment to do. not even elections, supposedly. why blinkin says this is not the election, but the matter is different. they just know that if zelensky goes, takes at least one step towards negotiations, everything will crumble inside, and they're with it, so they'll never go for it. that's all. no, no matter what they think about russia, this is the only way to keep the lensky gang in control of the war. if there is no war involved, there is no control, which is why the glare

is so enduring. the authorities are right, and therefore what is happening on the territory of ukraine threatens their power, and therefore they tell them not to care about zelensky, but they are afraid of losing power before the elections or as a result of the elections, therefore this is the main goal. how does this affect elections, because elections are not what will happen to the people of the united states for them, but elections are for them. and what will happen to me, where will i be, what will i do with me, this is how western democracy is arranged, the politician thinks about banning only one thing, and he is not interested in his political future in the state, not in the party, no one , he does not contradict advertising here.

the far eastern media tycoon oleg sedinko was dealt with in 2002 by a blast knocking out an iron door and several glasses in the stairwell. he was earning up to 10 million dollars a year already, then everyone was sure, a high-profile crime, the work of the bandits of the trifonov group, and only now it became known exactly those who could be involved in the murder. this is igor kovalchuk co-owner of the largest market in vladivostok. here at such a distance to each other, in addition, the consequences hit the head of the regional federation where alexander yasin you are an honest businessman for only the first million tycoon.

the task of great britain was to isolate the soviet union as much as possible because of european affairs. it was, of course, a huge mistake. british conservatives, because the development of the european order is possible only with the participation there in russia . they start there. yes. this is interesting. in general, yes, the fascists are quite an interesting movement . edward showed great interest in front of england was a big problem. and then there is the british council at the end of the war. so-called mar files were discovered. where was located judging by these documents edward uh eighth. this, it turns out, in every possible way supported balancing and in the uk itself

, information that is terrible for the british society. well, let's talk about saving about culture, about art. firstly. i want to say that i quite by accident found out, of course, but bought a book. so i told dima zakhara to stick the finds. i must say so fat. it must be said that i read the bar in literally 3 days. it's very powerful. this is more than a documentary. this is a real novel, such a panorama of the soviet political

artistic military part of soviet life in general here uh revolution until well practically up to the present day almost until the end of the soviet union well before the death of sholokhov is huge, where stalin acts figures. absolutely like that. i highly recommend everyone to look here. it seems to me that zakhar came out as a really great national writer, so i allowed this to be used so that i very well recommend everyone to read it. it's very exciting. it is very exciting. despite here is our large volume. actually actually reads amazing from here from

literature. i was very touched by your conversation with margarita simonyan on sunday i watched very true words. you said that you raised this issue. let me remind you that margarita said that she studied the questions that are asked at the exam in the literature of russian literature. it turned out that half of the questions were from harry. so, uh, i must say that there was one evening in my practice where i was present under the guidance of the patriarch. there is a council for the russian language. i performed there. it was six or seven years ago. i then said that i knew this due to the fact that my children were more or less small, even i don’t really understand why

russian schools study celingers, well, i don’t understand at all. i am a pretty good writer. although to be honest, well, there are cooler ones, if it comes to that, like folk , probably williams tennis well, well, why do it? i don’t understand these uh, it was favorably, by the way , listened to the patriarchs and well, it’s clear that those who are responsible for education for the enlightenment, in this sense, they are not guided by the fact that the patriarch also thinks by what he thinks in general. uh, most of the citizens in russia, in my opinion, the thing is that in no part of the european union in america you are taught russian literature anywhere in school, but nowhere is it russian or chinese, but this is not there, how cool. no , it's just pointless to think that in an american school they can

still study chekhov there. if this is studied somewhere, then it is defined in colleges at universities and the tone of russian studies there, where specially all over the world people are brought up on their national culture, as it was with us chekhov taught. well, your situation is slightly different. i have a different situation. you had a million derivatives, there were millions of derivatives well, you understand what they did here is not what i am against. edgar allan poe was a good writer, of course, and the seller is a good writer, not a great but a good writer, but well, well, children need to be educated in their own national culture, as it was in the soviet union in the soviet union , nothing was included in the program, except for national literature, which included

russian literature, by the way, literature peoples of the soviet union chingi website mats rasul gamzatov what was important and what was right? and in this there is no infringement of a person absolutely. i, brought up on the russian cult of soviet culture, must say that i know western culture well. i read everything i needed to read all the western classics and any person who will be brought up in their national tradition. he will certainly discover others of this for himself, but i understand why this happened, did this happen? i remember well in the early nineties. it was planted. i remember the names of these people. i think that many are still serving in the field of enlightenment somewhere,

because the concept was publicly spoken about. i remember these programs, i myself participated in some discussions about this , they said that we must educate a person of peace. we must educate not a person, not a citizen of the russian federation , but a person of the world. that's what it was for. why was this done? i understand too. and you , as a marxist, should also be absolutely clear, because it is because the young russian bourgeoisie that came to power. how it is said that, by its nature , the school, which was comproador for her, was needed for their children so that they would then go from this school to a foreign one. therefore, it was not necessary to study the history of the great patriotic war. she won't be useful there. it is because of this that we proceeded

to form the program. well, we got what we got. to educate a person, here we see on an example, so to speak. e bratsky, as we call the people, although in my opinion. he is not quite already, of course, fraternal, but nevertheless, well, they redid it for 30 years, but they were the same soviet people, educated, educated in the soviet school, and they changed it, and everyone talks about it, especially the youth, it is different, if the older generation in ukraine still, as it were, maintains some kind of connection, but the youth, the other can remake it and have remade it with us to a large extent. this man of the world, he was created, he was created, and this is the dilemma of today's situation, because we have come to a situation

where it would be like us from this world from that world, because a man of the world. naturally considered a man, the west is not a man of you general world china india people. west, from this very west, we were, as it were, removed. and what? the consciousness of a large part of russians, it is absolutely bifurcated today, and this is a fact, this is a fact, this is actually a big problem. i understand that she is still she is not yet fully formed, because there is still some internal misunderstanding. there is a feeling that no, this will all pass, and everything will be the same as before, but it will definitely not be the same. it really happened and indeed this gap is happening and of course. you are right when you they said on this program that, well,

you need to do it. this must be done immediately and must be done. and there is no need to wait and no need to hope that it will somehow settle down by itself, and everything will remain. like this. certainly. in russian schools, it is necessary to fundamentally change, because literature is the foundation of the foundations. how do you educate, on what kind of literature? you educate people for something, and you are the ones you will get. educate over harry and get not russians and not tatars and not americans, but not all, whom and not a person of the world, but simply not all of whom these mankurts whitemat. this there was a novel, yes, about mankur, yes, which , from whom you wiped everything, that's what you get, but this must be dealt with and must be dealt with today and must be done decisively. well, we

, unfortunately, do not see this, because this is, as it were, the mass, which is still, which itself has already been brought up in this, they cannot understand in any way that this is a matter of principle. this is a question of the survival of the nation. not just a nation. okay for some. it may not even sound anymore, because look, we have brought up a generation that does not know, nor songs, not their own culture know absolutely nothing of them. this is the majority of our youth. this is the majority of the youth. we must understand that this is a very serious problem. and they are confused today, because they see that a country is playing football with iraq and iran and in general, everything is changing and the women's youth team is playing with bhutan from bangladesh and how would it be a shock absolutely for them they are not ready for this

exactly, because they were brought up in a completely different way and with us it prevails go back to the bookstore and see who is on the shelves lies. everything everything. the same all the same mass american literature, it is still there our literature is no better. listen, it's better that ours is bad, but you understand the average. well, i didn't see a walker there. i didn't see faulkner. i would also say, okay, you'll go there edgar, well , write bigger or in general, but it's complicated. he is this in america, he is considered the main classic. well, it is clear that it is complex, that it is, as it were, no. he's not a non-fiction writer, which is strictly speaking, well, i'm not talking about that, so here's this conversation. it seems to me that your was very important and i hope that somehow it will reach. i understand, i

understand, now no one hears still september. maybe the nvp is still there. what difference does it make what they say? do not touch the main swamp, as before, the school does not obey the same level of municipalities or someone else? what is the overall program? what swallow? leave us all alone is still unclear to the school teacher in whose care? he is still not a sovereign man, yes, but he is so somewhere in the municipal and this is a tragedy. in our country, no one hears the vertical. it must finally come from above clearly and clearly. that's what it should be, it should be from the very top to come, here we will not be so different. i understand the situation, there is a war at the top in such a situation. by the way we say changes changes that fifth. well, i understand quite difficult. you

would you kind of have to keep the balance and the slightest wrong move in this situation. it is, as it were, fraught, so i understand that, humanly, there may be some slowness at the top, but in my opinion. this more doors to a real war. we must change. now you can still change. how to do it the soviet union did after the finnish company in the early years of the first years of world war ii. what changes took place in the ussr because they realized that it was not working, but something needed to be changed, but it’s better to do it today than it is now, the question is who is subordinate to the school, who is a school teacher? what is its place in the state structure? how is the cash benefit paid to him? how is it asked how it

is controlled? and then you go to high school. she actually slept with me. vladimir stefanovich litvinenko, rector of gordon, well, he says, you see, absolutely revolutionary. absolutely correct, and he speaks in a direct way. well, here are 15-20 directors in the nineties who sold and betrayed the country to please the soros. here, according to the 40 training manual , it is not clear what was turned into our specialists yes, it is clear that it is not clear, what is it a figure of speech. well, that's what i 'm saying that the armament of the army. i talk about this many times. well, we are forced to speak again with us, well, it seems to me that our the political elite still does not understand the meaning of culture. by the way,

i read zakhar's. i didn’t know during the war they started printing the last part of the shuuhu, it was just so important, yes, it turns out that yes it was opened in the forty-third year. well, yesterday i was at the moscow art theater, i really remembered the school student was opened in 1943, stalingrad everything hangs in the balance, and at this time a school is opening in which one of our most wonderful teachers was opened in 403, but we have a culture we are back and politically sovereignty i agree with this and we are proud of it. today. it's all right. well, we don't have cultural sovereignty. we have become a country with a secondary culture. this is a runner culture in its mass. she doesn't produce anything.

on it, unlike what was in tsarist imperial russia , don’t treat me like that, well, it was there and of course soviet because soviet culture was primary, but at the same time, oddly enough, it was connected with that traditional russian culture, which came out, as they say, from imperial russia well, you need to understand this, because no matter what tanks, guns you make. whatever aircraft you do at the controls. you will have young people who will be brought up at school, either over harry's field , or on chekhov's silks, whether they will be completely different people with completely different understandings and with different things, and it will be different with them and it will be possible to talk. this is what i would like , as they say, to convey this point of view. andrei of course, this is what he said, krym georgievich is a very serious problem,

because the school can't be changed so easily. this needs to be changed enough, and the personnel composition needs to be changed in relation to the state, to the point that it is necessary to change the standards in the higher school. this is a little easier. for example, now they gave instructions to introduce more. well, eight credits. i'm sorry, use this vocabulary that is. yes, uh, in short, in short, to increase by one semester practically the history of the fatherland. well, we will increase now the concept is teaching the history of the fatherland. outside there are no historical departments of historical universities, although it can also be said about what it does on what. strictly speaking to the center of leadership. that is, what here, uh, specific historical topics. do you stress you do hard culture? how did culture develop? let's say not the military period in world war ii, or you focus on how the soviet union developed there, let's say in the post-war period, or modern russia

, for example, and here very serious problems arise for the teacher himself. i have a textbook on the history of the fatherland. and there is outlined. in general, the second world war is well presented, but i do not have material on the modern history of russia, which means i will lecture one by one on world war ii, i will dedicate it again. here is modern russian materials, which are not printed in such a way that a very serious one is needed here. so to say , to pay attention to what is being written, and it is very difficult to prepare a textbook. that's what i 'm saying all the time, we need a common textbook, as it was in the soviet union, the history of the fatherland should be one single from moscow to vladivostok and kaliningrad, one by one textbook to study at school. want variety. yes, probably it will be. let it be special classes in universities of what? well, there are traditions of different interpretations. you need to know what to interpret. at first, you understood no interpretations in the nineties, correctly karen

georgievich says, as we were told at school, i was at a seminar. there in the ninety-sixth year for school teachers, guys. here come the teacher, he must carry his word. what word should he carry. he must carry what he has written in the textbook and sensibly convey this textbook. yeah uh its a student, so that later no one would come out, the comrades said, but, like the germans, they froze there near stalingrad, no matter how they lay, sorry for the boy. kolya from urengoy doesn't matter. in any case, when such people come up, then they still mock there at the monuments, er, of the great patriotic war. i say the connection is a generation has already disappeared. this is the young generation that does not communicate with veterans, who have not seen these veterans, they have already left for them. this story is for them. portraits for them are family albums and so on. these are the stories of mom and dad, who also didn’t fight, for whom they were grandfathers , this connection is necessary at school so that

it arises so that she is at the university, it’s already too late to do it at the university, he’s already talking, now let’s say georgievich about books. and you think a lot of books to read now read paper culture. it was paper culture for our generation. now they are reading in an abbreviated version, sometimes in an abridged version, what is on the internet. here you can read war and peace there 20 pages, in principle, everything four houses. well, yes, the british thing, but the americans are already like that, and comics. well, they weren’t quite, but not quite, but there were comics. i saw the rights, so here right now times . of course, we need to change, but i wanted to say a little about something else. that's when u now what is this terrible tragedy? is the external agency of american shi or hif really in a number of uh-huh who is this person with

what kind of psyche, but in principle, of course, these are these people from my point of view. these are sick people, you know? all of them should be sent to a psychiatrist, but growth is the consciousness of this he goes transgender and moreover, he is encouraged by the state and is actively encouraged about it. we often spoke here, and therefore such cases will most likely increase, because she feels herself, what she feels like a man who went there for justice, because for what she understands or he understands justice, because as in a certain, so to speak, male hormone or a man appeared in the body of a woman. well, this is also a certain inoculation, certain cultures. by the way, we also relate to this enough, tolerantly, we have no such condemnation. in society

we watch to know everything about russia the best historical series.

yes, we do not show rigidity, remember the soviet laws about sodomy. now that doesn't exist either. especially when it comes to return. yes it is very. it seems to me that sick people should be treated. and this is from my point of view. these are sick people. still. these people are mentally abnormal and can be helped at the initial stage, especially. it's probably curable. and if we do not notice it, but everyone will everyone will assume that this is in general

fine. if they do it in the west, why can't we do it? therefore, this must be fought and fought harder. i adhere to a conservative point of view here, but, probably, such harshness, it will be more justified, because, in fact, this is a national project. we need to carry out the national project. no transgender perform. i mean to fix our demographics. here biden. it seems to me that they still give him some kind of medicine, because that in some cases he is adequate enough he makes a speech. in general, it’s normal and now this is such a manifestation. well, last time yesterday, for example, this powerful old man was already dismantled here. that's why, from my point of view, of course, it's better. terrible kamala than without end, because oh loves kamala man. she is, in general,