it's normal if the west does it, why can't we do it? therefore, this must be fought and fought harder. i adhere to a conservative point of view here, but, probably, such harshness, it will be more justified, because, in fact, this is a national project. we need to carry out the national project. no transgender will comply. i mean to fix our demographics. here biden. it seems to me that they still give him some kind of medicine, because that in some cases he is adequate enough he makes a speech. in general, it’s normal and now this is such a manifestation. well, last time yesterday, for example, this powerful old man was already dismantled here. that's why, from my point of view, of course, it's better. terrible hamala than biden without end, because oh , kamala-loving kamala man. she is in general, she will bring the united states to death.

here it will happen, most likely, it doesn’t seem that if there was kamala, they would have disintegrated more strongly, however, now trump is coming, who you can treat it however you like. i considered him and consider him the destroyer of america, it’s good that, of course, of course, we need such people, the faster it shrinks, the faster it was forced to show it simply, but it came. he testified sixth political ambitions, has no big ones at least. at least not yet shown. so it can give trump a pass. well, this is now sacred to the united states in principle. well, if trump goes, then it will, maybe some de santis will come out or someone else is indifferent. that's when they are now talking about the fact that the elections in the united states is serious. in my opinion. here are the last serious elections, it was the sixteenth year, maybe because

the twentieth year it seemed to us that the elections, in principle, can be carried out in such a way that they will be correct and elect the right person 26% of americans agree on one thing, who believe that the elections the american people have elections. uh, the twentieth year was stolen. well , trump did not go to aggravate the situation. he did not go, did not, but real, so to speak, revolutionaries. there are few among them. therefore, the fact that he is again creating a revolution on the air by shaking it is probably, of course, an interesting question. but in principle, if the democrats manage to squeeze him now, you can squeeze the rest of the republicans, then the elections. they are what you will win in the same way in the twenty-fourth year and more, i even think that they will bring bayer to power here for the second time for the second time. if he certainly can, uh, say something to the american people, not what he says, but judging by

the way the audience is. you correctly pointed to this attention. uh, fu, our attracted to the fact that how the audience reacted to the audience is ridiculous. so he says, in general, the joke itself is funny, that i have ice cream upstairs. i'll be honest, okay, american jokes and leave aside. they are specific, they laugh at some things that we would not laugh at, but this is a tragedy, sir. there were three people, three children. i'm not talking about three more three adult teachers, here are three children, at least, died and people are laughing. above that something to laugh at. as a matter of fact, there is nothing funny, and bidens will not condemn bidens for this. i think it will not lose ratings on this, so when the american society, it is already to a large extent. well, let's just say it's split, because in some states they pass laws against these transgender property - it passed this law and it seems to have inspired her,

what is it called? photo of this monster's room. and it’s forbidden there, they forbade filming something and filming time for a ban. yes therefore, when the americans will now teach us democracy, they themselves will be democracy. this, probably, now the main thing would be the agenda , if you do not know. because the united states is now one of the signs from my point of view. not here. even i will not look for a russian or anti-chinese attitude, because it is obvious. yes, it is quite obvious that the united states opposes the summit for democracy, of course, with an authoritarian state in the form of russia and china, but to a greater extent. it seems to me that this is important now for the american the elite is not even about the elections, but it is important for them to prove it to themselves and show their

ally that the united states remains hippos. it is important that they stop those 117 states that they will assemble, it is important for them to show them we do not recognize. we are not china not a single one. well, nevertheless , it is important for them for the american elite itself to show that the opinion of others around american lithuania is of concern. it is important, it is important, only on itself it is not the russian elite for which it is very important that she be given a label not reign and head stroked in every sense, this is conditionally convincing, and to see him in general, america always didn’t give a damn about what they think the world’s limes, but this is the forty-fifth year, and after 45 years, america just broke everyone over the knee here. it is only recently that foreign policy has become a factor, including the presidential elections. no, she was gone. well, what is

always? well, elections are all foreign policy exclusively, i'm sorry, i want to remind you of the phrase squirrels clinton and cyclamen will set foot. yes , because she was fine. no because that then it became clear that no one cares about the war and managed to lose, bush, who was betting on the war, managed to lose in the elections, because the americans said, yes, we don’t care, we are much more interested in what we had. and here for the first time, when the fifty- second year a man in the yard in 2023. you are simply saying that the foreign policy of 192 is foreign policy. with every change of administration, a very big mouth played in 1952 in the 1960s. come on, a rocket explosion and so on, doctors go on. now these americans will be offended by me. here every time you don’t follow the doctor, it’s clear in what year he graduated from the university, because at that moment he had run out of knowledge about medicines, then they updated some of them

, and so most live at the moment he was released. that's what they were and so on. yes, well, a throwaway, the election of a man in two thousand and twenty-three is in the yard. well, so what and what classic american i am. here's an example i'm going through. and this, by the way, is this room, this room of this monster. what's the most important elements trash trash and lgbt flag ukrainian, for sure now, if we look and find ukrainian, yes, but this is on the right, what kind of flag is so strange now they will begin. come on, why did he tell putin he was trying to paste it, that on the maps of the united states the post-war period, foreign policy appeared the question of the war period had already begun, the younger was foreign policy

seriousness. never has it influenced the choice of an american voter of american voters outback. reminded you. what percentage of americans are generally outside the grand prix? passports, more precisely with passports, because he is not needed at home. they have a passport fulfills the essence beyond. and how many americans have ever traveled outside their country is a very small percentage. and most of the interest is therefore yes , and literature about art, in my opinion. this is a really, really important topic, because it really matters who sets the tone here. here i am, by the way, i want to, well, to support krang-gerovich, in general. in general, pathos. everything, everything, absolutely right. i don't understand at all. why teach

challenger sangers is probably the most incomprehensible american writer outside the united states. it got to the point where the title of his main novel was mistranslated, so that at least something was understandable. and here, ah, but uh, in general, i can say that what's the matter in america in the first place, well, that is, a person who catches a baseball ball, so to speak, it’s understandable, worries and that’s it. nothing is clear here catcher in the rye, beauty. that's how, well, yes, and people read it, although, like many american authors, they grew up a lot in translated into russian per- yes-yes, maybe well, they say, they say that some translations. yes, even shakespeare grew up, so to speak , they managed to appear there, but that's not the point. i just want to say that u look in u in america , for example, u read dostoyevsky more than we do and really go to school for a second. yes, it doesn't matter. it should be instilled in americans it should be instilled in americans to read lies that america believes are just comics and views of life. let me alone, but i 'll show you the statistics. they read dostoyevsky and publishes

a number of copies. more. i do not disclose. you said publish. i will say, so we publish less, because in soviet times we have. from afar, so much so that in all stores there is a complete building of dostoevsky published in the past. fine. unfortunately, the americans buy from them. yes, yes, those who actually read it, the americans who read in what yes, yes, i'm already silent about how much they read so -called other fiction, buy it. forgive me for the english term. it’s like our separate tragedy that such a genre doesn’t exist at all or they write it, sorry in certain universities of two but another conversation is curious that the americans managed to make them read chekhov, if they start listing great writers, be sure to remember liud, outstoy, why yes, because they either read and watched the film adaptation before them , this is part too, as if their course, they managed to make it so that this is their argument. now, if you listen to their

propaganda, they did both dostoevsky and tolstoy and their arguments. moreover, directed against us, yes, which they inserted very simply very simply that very simply for them quoting tolstoy's film adaptation of tolstoy's reasoning about tolstoy's comments to tolstoy will always be such that liberalism is right around the world, and the russian bear suppressed, so to speak, lera tolstoy, and he was a true globalist. and dostoevsky does the same with russians. what do they know? who is this, but now? your everyone knows in the country in this. all the trouble is on the ground. why make such a basis for selling pieces of books, you know? or do you want to say that everyone goes to their grandmother's chest and reads dostoevsky why are all 140 million on fire book? no? those who read this say statistics. now it's recent.

no, these are statistical data. unfortunately, i just show the citation of american politicians. including russian classics is quite high, film adaptation, hollywood sufficient number of including our classical works. well, now this is data, now , as it were, what to do with it, because in fact you need to look at it from the other side. yes, they are now, in my opinion, in an attempt to punish all russians. eh, for the most part they shoot themselves in the foot, not only there is some kind of oil or some other war. here they are when they begin to cancel the same dostoevsky tolstoy and by the way, saying shakespeare well, this is even before you see, i liked the phrase transgender. the national project will not be fulfilled. it must be carved somewhere in granite, in general, in fact. here i am well, when they took up transgender people, it 's clear that they didn't like shakespeare in practice. in my opinion, if we look at the history of russia, and somehow before the soviet soviet. here the soviet begins stumbling, because we always read foreign literature. and by the way, speaking at school

, it was true for extracurricular reading. i remember in the summer i read, that is, outside the classroom. never passed with us cool first passed, and i studied the dawn, i'm from the seventies to the eighties foreign literature. well, because i am the most human, so, yes, yes, yes, so, look, everyone read this literature and moreover, we had series coming out, which means absolutely wonderful, as if international parts from this, because there was not much published, but some really represented world classics and , moreover, that our person is brought up with really the best examples of world literature. it's not bad. her question here is king, georgievich is 10% right on who it is, and andrei also probably said who it is, then, so to speak, as a child or a slightly older student child. they are still quite so often formed late it will explain. who will give it, who

will tell him what it is about? this will turn here if to speak, it is so to speak, the development of a person is high and spiritual to speak, who a person will form. and speaking more primitively in terms of social issues , in terms of what we really need to confront this very west, who will actually turn the world heritage into their tool. this is what the international dispute is about now. i believe that we are a country with a universal tradition. that is, we can take everything into ourselves and make it really our own. in my opinion. here in this is a distinctive feature of the russian people. this is a real man of the world, more precisely, this is a real universal man. this is our man. because he will never do with culture what he did yours before, pay attention. the literary characters and images that the russian position uses are all such consumer goods, while

the american ones are all there, that is, nothing of the fatherland. that is, even close to even a serious tomato yes, and further around harry potter, so in my opinion, in my opinion. that's it. it's the kind of thing that's much more difficult, firstly, but on the other hand very important. because by and large, as in my time, i don’t remember who wrote about the soviet union, how the americans would write , pay attention to what is happening there, that they turned our literature, the literature of our, so to speak , european brothers into a mouthpiece in his communist propaganda. then we did it. as if now, when they themselves cancel their own culture, why not do the same, because we canceled our culture in the nineties, but return necessary. well, then, as it turns out without ideology. here, we are returning to the circle about which we have been talking here for many years, and this requires a purposeful policy, by the way, the directed policy of our culture

is incomprehensible. what is it based on. no, there is supposedly a document. yes, in the main directions, but, by the way, by the way, ideology, ideology and all kinds of political things, including internal political things, they are made up of such things. for example, a man, not my opinion, educated. he may not get. there's even higher education. well, or get a higher technical education some kind of narrow techie. yes, but at the same time, he should not just go out there from a higher educational institution or high school. he just has to come out as a patriot. he should go out with a man with a normal head, not for some foggy nonsense. he must understand god climbed the cylinder with him, but generally speaking, about what shakespeare he should. remember who this is our man should in my opinion. i don't know if you can argue with me. you really are there this person has a huge, so to speak, great vocation, because the only place where, in fact, all this world, so to speak, culture can be preserved. if things go on like this, that one without any varieties

and poseidons will remain only with us, and this is in my opinion. and, by the way, this is what it seems to be, as it should stem from ideology, but on the other hand, this is one of the building blocks. i took it myself. better than you, comrades russians, brothers or literary critics, and i think which turn to the east you are discussing, who is better sanger faulkner, how does he translate, and i will repeat my favorite questions again. how many russians because we say turn to the east? china our brother, this is not the first year, there is an iron partnership. mountain back. who can name four classic chinese novels. i don't know, well, i even think people who haven't read hugo know that it's french someone there. will they confuse the writer or the artist? that's who will name the largest one, that pine in a red body, yes , retell the sun-kun or stop at my

fight or i tell him to catch the reflection of the moon in a glass of wine and choked. but it was never taught in the school curriculum. culture, in principle, europe-centric. here we discussed in the wings. and who will name the largest islamic universities there, and we have, in the russian federation, more precisely, how many republics where islam is the dominant religion in russia, three republics, in my opinion, where buddhism is put like this, and who knows from the russians the foundations of this religion , which, in general, is the traditional religion of the russian federation or, for example, as it was in the soviet union when they were promoting, and writing or the union republics , but i think they didn’t fulk on well, of course, this is a great writer, like all of those listed here, but it is necessary that a native of udmurtia buryatia understand and be proud of his literature, which is

part of great russian literature. this is a big cultural task. and if we are talking about turning to the east, then, probably, this should be considered. how can we study chinese culture. how can we study korean culture, islamic culture, if we build our relations with these countries, well soviet time all this was studied, starting with the nipple. let me not have it. no, i'm just saying that we had fairy tales of the peoples of the world , where there were whole vietnamese folk tales , some chinese folk tales, again , the soviet union had a very large such cycle, which was called the library, world literature. yes, i still have complete copies in all complete copies here you can read all this, but the only thing i will say was an exception when they knew this, of course, the tajik persian poetry of omar khayyam is it was so. even very popular all the time.

i didn’t want to talk about this, as we are still returning to political topics and talking , uh, the president of belarus will come out, uh, on march 31 with salvation, where accents will be placed, including on tactical nuclear weapons, although i think in this message will not be the main thing, after all, stubbornly the economy, if we are strong in the economy, then tactical nuclear weapons will be here as reinforcements, and in general. see what reaction it produced at first, but we tried to emphasize again do. eh, a good world to us with a bad game. now the entire security council is hysterical. still, they held back, but it didn’t work out from my point of view either. that is why the moment has been chosen for this statement. although the decision was made earlier. in political terms , the expected semi-mythical advertised is being promoted in the west, probably it will definitely be a ukrainian offensive. there, zelensky travels along the front line, and they unwind him for them. this is a very serious factor. they are preparing for it. they already supply more equipment. what

they promised. and, let's say, in my opinion, there are 14 british tanks there, now there are already 28. they are trying to grab hold. for this moment, that theme of ukraine goes away. it ceases to be interesting and in this respect. this is the political effect, the informational and political deployment of tactical lake weapons, played such a role. uh, well, now this image of the kursk bulge is popular in connection with the expected offensive of the ukrainians. remember how there was such an artillery counterattack before the start, and the german offensive, which led them a little confusion. in political terms , the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons is such an informational and political, but a preventive step together. with that still, our adversary cannot be underestimated, and uh, despite all this mental weakness of biden to all their comic statements. they are very crafty people. they are valid in january-february-march. and here it's just a peak - this is a meeting of putin sidenkin. suffered a number of

political diplomatic defeats, but this will not lead to a desire to conclude. there some kind of world to go towards. this will lead to even more desire for us to come to russia and belarus and china and iran and go on an escalation. there, you understand, we sometimes overestimate international organizations . russia tried to hold the un security council. uh, so the decision to create an investigation team failed. yes, and the americans in the same way russia will block any of their submissions. that is , it is completely devalued. we can predict in advance the results of any vote; practically they are known, and in this i will tell you a story, if you will allow me, but not in order to once again reproach them for some kind of double standards. well, now the persecution of the orthodox church. now, uh, that means human rights in europe are cracking down hard. we once again show and

have been saying faces for many years, well, you see, well, what should they see. listen, they hushed up the holocaust in the thirties in the thirties. in the thirty-eighth year it became clear. yes, goebbels held a special company, but now we know that this press is sasha the bbc did not raise this topic , among other reasons, so as not to irritate their anti-semitic groups, which were very strong in the same britain. in the forty-first year, the international mission of the red cross was brought to soviet prisoners of war. and we know what they did. they said that the content of soviet prisoners of war does not contradict international standards in the forty -fourth year. this is a shame of the international red cross when they arrived in the state of treisen they were shown. uh, the obraztsova jewish village, as they called them, they said, yes, they became, everything very positive impressions of the red cross. in particular, there were daughters. and if this was in their history, they didn’t change at all and the essence.

what are they not going to play about here according to any rules and for them there is no international organization, any appeals are meaningless, uh, we are talking op, uh, nuclear weapons, and who has been mooring for nuclear weapons all year, and now they blame russia that it was russia blackmailing. west you from the russian leadership from the president of the defense administration to the minister of foreign affairs heard at least one statement about the use of nuclear weapons, and dozens of western politicians that russia can supposedly be used, but i do not rule out now here the americanists, perhaps military experts will say that this is impossible. and i do not rule out that the united states will not use nuclear weapons. hey, look at them. what kind of image they create the victory of russia is impossible under any circumstances. well, there will be a rout, let's say this ukrainian offensive, russia will go on the offensive, will go to the dnieper, this is not a red line for the americans. and i i do not rule out that this is their territory.

and how this situation differs there, i don’t know from hiroshima and nagasaki when they used the answer, they needed to fuck it up unconditionally, but they will say, and we are tactical use there, i don’t go into military details, i’m saying that these people are ready to go to any provocation for further escalation. and now we have taken very serious steps. i just watch how it is presented in our information field. well, it goes a little. hooray for patriotism, that here we are, they say, screwed up the muzzle of the americans in the poles. yes, they made strong steps, but at the same time, it will be very much behind them now, and these steps can be extremely unpleasant , you need to prepare for this. ahem, i would like to link everything that we have talked to you into some such concept as the policy of containment. yes, a hybrid war is being waged against russia. everyone knows about it, nobody denies it. but the policy of eruption itself is expressed in several directions at once, which we reveal. as they allow themselves

to be tested, this is also a problem in culture, tested in education. they were laid down and so on in the nineties, when it was born on the ruins of the soviet union there in russia and they said that america is a friend. and then we used 200 varieties of sausages that we had in the store for our culture. we were told it didn't matter. the main thing is that there are 200 sausages in stores. they chose any life, as in america , and we in america went wherever we went, but then it turned out what it was? how is this a lure? yes, and here is the only state that is still friends with america in the post-soviet space. this ukraine yes. what did it lead to? we are seeing this with you, but america is doing containment why because it understands that the strategy that it developed initially in relation to the ruins of the soviet union, including russia, does not work, but it cannot be changed, but it cannot be changed quickly therefore, russia must be contained. the war in ukraine is deterrence. why

do they say that it is not necessary, but to cease fire, we will fight to the end and the world only on the terms of the americans should not be another world exist, so the military conflict will go there to the last ukrainian. and even when we reach the dnieper and even uzhgorod nothing will end, they need the time factor, and they must win it. they are building another citadel they will arrange in another place, which is close to resources in order to then challenge their right to this world, which they are now losing. yes, they are losing. they are losing. they are sacrificing europe to rob europe, because funds are needed in order to build that the world they talk a lot about nuclear weapons, but if you look at them. here are some interesting documents that, by years yes, again, of nuclear policy, their reviews of nuclear policy 2010-2018. and this is the twenty-second year, where these reviews were hidden in another document called, uh, on national security , too. that is, before. it was a separate

document. now it has become part of a larger document. that is, they hid it, when we look at the numbers that they indicate in 2010, everything was fine with them. they they built gigantic warhead programs for missiles. uh for medium -range missiles for cruise missiles, everything is fine 2018. uh, they said everything is fine. we defeated trump spoke. we remember this february 2018. well, then our president spoke to marty and they sprinkled everything on everything, because it turns out everything that has not been built since 2010. and if we remember that this happened in 2010 , this is a nuclear policy review. on april 1, as far as i remember, on april 8 we signed an agreement with nv-3, that is, at the beginning the americans considered what they needed, and then we are with us an agreement was concluded, and a little later, at the end of april, a global instant strike strategy appeared, which consisted in the following: we do not agree with everyone, we will punish

instantly and representatives. eh, the chiefs of staff of the joint staff of the united states, he honestly said, yes, we are ready now for any country right now. point your finger it was 2010 2018, dramatically, but they uh understand. it's that everything changes. they tried to slow down this process, and therefore brought the situation in ukraine to the point where we are now there we deal with this nazi refurbishment, which is impossible to educate first, not culture, nothing, and you and that's it. death including isn't it, why are you digging there? we're going to give him the title of righteous among the nations. he doesn't want to talk about it at 17. there was one valuable relic in the family. i

picked it up and you said you'd return it. a tube