yes, that's how everyone experiences the arrest of an american spy who pretended to be a journalist. better interesting, here blinkin spoke straight. at the same time, none of these personalities said anything about

the tragedy that is unfolding in our eyes. on the other hand, they are already calling for escalation. here is one of the republicans. he just speaks directly. give ukraine any weapon, except for nuclear nuclei. let's go right away. at the same time my question will be solved. i’m someone in what, because i ’ve been saying for a long time that enough is enough, you have to approach americans. that's how i say it, right? choose in which hand sarmat or poseidon and that's enough? confidently to the victory of the world mind all-consuming villages of the atom the military budget of the pentagon because the open typesets under the conflict with russia china no one thinks how it will end three nuclear powers whip

deadly gatherings. and the americans believe that yes, no, well, we’ll normally resist, which at the same time completely delights me with the level of idiocy of people whom fate has now brought to the very top and the european union is going to china on a side chair a person goes to china to teach the leadership of china how to behave correctly? but why not go right away? and don't take your patient with you. well, they have nothing to do there. if they think they will come and be. well

, it will be the same as scholz drove for a long time, half an hour of audience, he went back. i mean, they don't understand at all. this is a stupid, arrogant, anglo-saxon tradition through the lip to explain this. the tool that we want from them, so that we look at them, as if they were people , nothing has changed with them. this european colonialism has nothing to do with it do. but of course they don't say yet. we will look at your relations with russia. based on this, we will think about how we can build relations with you. which no one voted, whose macron the french hate the europeans. who are you anyway, if you don't understand something about what china is saying. well, listen to what

the representative of the ministry of defense of the people's republic of china says. chinese russian relations are not like the military-political union of the cold war, they go beyond this model of state relations and have the character of not joining non-confrontation and not targeting a third country china's armed forces are willing to work together with the russian military to fully realize the important content achieved by the two heads of state to further strengthen strategic communications and coordination conduct joint maritime and air patrols exercises and drills strengthen cooperation and exchanges between two armies. including within the framework of existing mechanisms , mutual trust in the military sphere should be further deepened, joint implementation of global initiatives in the field of security and joint defense of international justice to serve the maintenance of international and regional security and stability.

joint russian chinese service to the maintenance of international security and stability, but it is clear that after these words, mark mile 's head was completely blown off and how concerned you are about russia's role in facilitating china's strategic nuclear breakthrough and what you recommend doing i am worried not only about this, but also about any consistency and cohesion between russia and china in this particular strategic environment that we are in. we see them coming closer, i wouldn't call it a true full-fledged alliance in the real sense of the word, but we see them coming closer. and this causes problems. and then, if you add iran as a third country, then these three countries together will be problematic for many years. i think especially russia china because of their ability.

the germans are amazing people, that's just amazing, so you listen to the head bundestag bar bilbas. inferior to the bundestag. this is how he now reads the history of the second world war. great britain played a key role in the development of beans from tyrannacism we are all deeply grateful for that . we will also never forget that the uk was

a place of refuge for many persecuted by the nazis. tell me which british troops were taken, berlin. tell me which british troops were being liberated. which german cities are in heavy battles right? in what year the thirty-ninth question fled liberated from themselves, yes, and you were liberated by the canadians too they took the canadians and liberated them together britain played a key role in the liberation of europe and you applaud this brainless cattle continuers of the tradition of german oblivion even dresden burned down, of course, thanks to many kisses.

or maybe you remember what british nazism was, and why hess actually flew there, and what he was waiting for, maybe remember the royal family joyfully zigzagging, maybe remember the british football team joyfully throwing a nazi ridge during friendly or official match with germans, you sorting through the history of the nazi bastards have completely lost their minds. feet more let's go kiss each other. let me show you so that you remember who freed whom from what. do you know this royal family or not? who is this? who is joyful , who are these people who are joyful? not a family of british monarchs yes, now you read it all forget, of course, so funny. yes

, the feeling, of course, that there is little left of the american british german policy of people with at least fragmentary brains. not i can deny myself the pleasure, what is the nationality of the bidens? no one knows, i know now, i don’t know now, because this is the fifth nationality of the baidan. well, the last word is a darlander. karl is german. no, he showed you a german and don't guess i'm a klych. well, let's look at the next nationality that his father tried on, the nickname that he received earlier when he won by a margin of 3,200 votes for a seat in the senate. at the age of 29. they started calling me oh, you think i'm joking. i'm not kidding, really, i'm not kidding, thanks

overwhelming support from the greek american community. so let's look ahead. who else can, but i'm not stupid. i married the daughter of dominic jakopa. so you know, now you have a little bit of italian understand, right? what do we have next, by the way? even though i'm white, i'm not dumb. i know what strength you think, i'm joking. i learned about the divine nine a very long time ago. and this is not the end. i was born in a coal town with cranton, pennsylvania in northeast pennsylvania in the irish catholic area, then when the coal mines are dead. we moved to the state dever to a city called flayman, which was a working class city, but everyone in the city was either polish or italian. i am ashamed of the fact that my name does not end.

this is, of course, the president, but he is not the president of the americans. no, he's the president of the marines sex minorities. it is clear they are now they go in a crowd. arrange protest marches. do you see the trans?

save lives now save them. it's not fighting in the kentucky capitol now, you see . but the marines got tired and decided lie down. like this. the last sane person here is what he said here calling russia a gas station with a bunch of nuclear weapons and calling putin an authoritarian gas station with a legacy of nuclear weapons from the old soviet union this is exactly the type of ingenuous thinking that led decades of failed diplomacy and ultimately to war and what this will lead to war, people like mitroumi and rondes are very similar to each other, who insist on our arrogant attitude towards russia as a deeply inferior

country, having neither history, nor culture nor pride is not only ignorant and stupid, but their relationship makes impossible peace negotiations absolutely impossible. under my administration. we have been tough on russia, tougher than under any other administration, but we have also shown respect for russia and the russian people. we have demonstrated an understanding of russian history, the fact that russia lost more than 20 million lives in world war ii. they fought alongside us. such rhetoric is not windows, ridiculing russia's nuclear weapons as well as hints that putin should be tried and presumably executed as a war criminal only increase the likelihood of a deadly nuclear escalation, in fact. this testifies to the lack of depth of frivolity and inability to understand the intricacies and complexities of foreign policy. you

cannot do certain things. and finally achieve peace. now is not the time for learning as we face the possibility of nuclear war and our leaders. if you can call them that, they led us to this, and here we are, the word nuclear was not even mentioned during trump administration. now she is mentioned. every hour of every day. we need a statesman and a peacemaker in the white house, not someone who recites thoughtless and reworked theses in order to win the approval of a failed foreign policy establishment that did not know what he was doing in 2024. i am the only candidate who can prevent world war iii. i will prevent the third world war no one. another will not do it before you have time. very right because he's

an american. yes, you can bones, and he's rooting for america and he understands that this is an arrogant attitude towards russia, he talks about it, he understands what risks this brings for america, he understands the fallacy of this strategy. and he is trying to draw the attention of the american elite to this, and in general he is addressing, apparently, to all that pro -american coalition that exists today and which today is on the side of this old outgoing world. i experienced a culture shock today. i read the text today. uh, those are the declarations of the democracy summit. and how i was taught. i took. well, i think the document but there are many countries of the signature, there i took a pen and started printing out so that i could not read on the phone and started trying to read, i stumbled in the first phase, in the second, in the third. there were 17 straight and 17 points from some point, i

caught myself thinking that i don’t understand at all. ah, text. it is full of ambiguity, incomprehensible polo, which means that it is completely incomprehensible what they signed under. ah, the participants of this summit. then i realized that the whole point of this document is just two. this means paragraphs, which, by the way, were not signed some participants who signed with an asterisk and said, but this is us, no matter how we do not sign. i will now explain why i am talking about this in detail, so there are two theses. it is clear that the first is the condemnation of russia for aggression against ukraine and the second thesis that it is necessary to bring war criminals for e, war crimes that have committed in ukraine to trial according to international law. and there is such an ornate phrase and national law. e. and

by the way, this is the second thesis. this the second paragraph, bluntly, could be interpreted differently, but they concern this e war criminals, e, in. the first stage of the ukrainian nazi regime, maybe this was meant by, uh, the author of this declaration, but that's not the point, because what is this summit in general and uh, what is the united states of america doing today and if you mean , like this, uh, the design of their actions in support of the nazi regime in ukraine, they form a kind of coalition, that is , in this coalition there is certainly the core of the country nato, which was saluted and which is unconditionally supported by the united states of america well, there is a big world in which, for example, china exists, and there are new asian tigers that have their own interests, there is

the middle east, there are countries in africa, and now they all want them to the extent put in this pro-ukrainian and anti-russian coalition. and this one is also one of the projects. and you know, it seems to me that a year. sbu is the year when many in the modern world one way or another slowly gradually, but you have to make a choice and get up, as they say now, i like this expression on one side or another of history. it is clear that each country interprets this story differently. here we have seen, the mad leader of the bundestag, who interprets history and is simply perverted. and uh, so that blacks become white and

vice versa, this is also, by the way, logic, and today's collective west, which cannot renounce this colonial thinking of such a humiliating derogatory attitude towards other countries, in including china, now i will try to formulate one thesis, which, probably, will look rather unpopular. but after all, recently china has taken a very wait-and-see position in relation to all the processes that have taken place in recent decades in the world. and let's admit that china, which very quickly and very energetically invaded, quickly took over this world economic elite, actually overtaking the united states in

a number of indicators and setting the task of thirtieth year to ensure its complete technological independence, by the way, 10 years ago, i read one article when many western experts were just saying that china would never solve the problem, that it would certainly be a big economic tiger. well, as for the technological lag here, like, is it like almost an eternal story? yes , today china is unsuccessful in solving this problem very successfully and believes that in the thirtieth year it will become an absolutely independent power in terms of technology, but that's when events took place in the world that led to swa led to the conflict in ukraine when the russian federation had no other means to declare its position and its disagreement with the way the modern world works. china, let's admit it , took a wait-and-see attitude, like many

other countries that today will have to make their choice. and when the americans slowly steadily and let's admit they successfully solved their tasks, when they drilled the unwanted regime, including in europe, they defeated yugoslavia. and who then publicly opposed, yes, someone publicly took a position condemning america's actions when there was a war in iraq when libya was smashed when there were several stages of nato decisions and in fact, uh, along the entire perimeter of our border, they provided for themselves, uh , this nato arc was left with only ukraine, they slowly reformatted it carefully year after year and achieved their goal, the only country that resisted this. it was russia , we demonstrated several stages of this resistance

we did it in munich, first rhetorically, then we did it during the south ossetian war , then we did it in the crimea in 1914. then we did it in 1918 when we announced that we had arguments in our nuclear capabilities. finally. we did this on february 24, 1922, when a special war operation began in ukraine, but we did it alone. yes, we had an ally partner, i remind you of belarus, by the way, which is also from the point of view. even external rhetoric is very for a long time occupied such, i would say, well, on a vector and accurate, even in words, position in relation to the fact that e is sovereign ukraine and we, so to speak, do not interfere in this conflict to the point that, as he called zelensky there, as we remember yes, nits here

to nits from neat respect. this year has passed. they had to live through it so that the rhetoric of mr. lukashenko would also change. and now china has certainly pumped up its muscles, but in full accordance with the chinese tradition occupied. well, let's say so vividly, expressed about the chinese position. that's how beneficial it would be for us not to behave like that. it is beneficial for us to cooperate with the americans with europe, they have achieved that they blocked america in trade and economic relations with europe, they are now the number one trading economic partner, yes, and in general around the world today the chinese economic presence is quite obvious, but china did not get up which side of history before the special military operation in ukraine began and now the question arises. why is it anyway march 2023 happened? why

this historic visit and everything that accompanied it took place, because i have no doubt today and actually. this is not my point of view. eh, reading. uh, listen to the americans. what does mi say? what it says there, i don't know. pinkin is all the rest, who in fact publicly admit that the strategic union of russia and china has taken place. yes, they are constantly trying to say something about it in this regard. they try to u talk about what, well, we don't need to exaggerate, but they doubt the military component there. although, uh, as we remember, 4.5 hours of putin's conversation and uh, chairman aleksey, we finished with the fact that the communiqué said that issues of military-technical cooperation were discussed. it is written in black and white and in russian and chinese and english . well, now what we heard

today. here you have shown this story. well, what else is needed to answer this question, but for me it is important to another. why did the chinese make this choice? well , it’s somehow customary to say that it’s taiwanese history has moved them. i'm sure this is far from the case with taiwan. everything was clear, it was clear that the americans would carry out this completely elephantine position in a china shop, and china today, in my opinion, does not have the resource to solve it with tools at the click of a military e. maybe there is, i can doubt i'm not a military expert, but it's unlikely that they already have it on the table. the solution is such a technical solution to this problem by military force , i admit that they are not ready for this either political. or maybe not military. technically. i don’t know, i’m not sure, but in my opinion, this is the main thing for me, in my opinion, the chinese, who are inclined to deep long

reflection, have come to one key conclusion, if you imagine for a second that what is happening today in the ne zone in ukraine will end . according to the american scenario, well, as they say, we will achieve a military victory if we imagine that all these efforts that the collective west is making today, and i believe that the scale of tecusili was not fully calculated, nor by the chinese, and maybe not even by us, because that military assistance, which, in general, those resources that are thrown today to defeat russia like this in ukraine, they are colossal. there you can count them there in warheads, you can count them in money, but all this is a colossal effort that is aimed at ensuring that russia is defeated. and if you imagine this result, then the chinese begin to calculate all the consequences for themselves. that's when it's not just a return to the world by the rules. it's

a return to this world brand new the stage where the first who will be subjected to this collective sharp blow will be great china and therefore china has made its choice. this is the result of the yearly result of svl, very positive. okay, i had three theses going to be four guns. i want to give you a little answer right now. okay, that's because this is where they talk about your analysis. it is separated by a comma and the conclusion is no, because china made this choice on completely different grounds, but as a result of the year, china unequivocally switched to the side of a potential winner. thesis nothing without changing it. well, it can be considered so, but i will still remain with my thesis, as i formulated you, because the deep chinese analysis of this year

was dedicated to one thing. name one other country in the world. by the way, it is doubtful that china can be like that, which will fight for a year against an army of 800,000, which supplies 50 countries with advanced nato weapons in the conditions of 14,000. if i'm not mistaken, maybe already fifteen fourteen thousand sanctions have been announced, yes, announced insulation. and well, the curse may not have been. that's when the chinese looked because of this issue. and what will happen to china if he announces such conditions? this is a hypothetical question, but in relation to russia. ethical not non-historical russia survived and is able to win, even at the point that

donald trump is so afraid of, but this point is not unobvious, russia is able to win anyway. that's what china saw and that's why it made its choice. well, there was one. yes, i see it a little differently. sidimka cracked down in 2002 to $10 million.

yes, because conscience or evidence, we took up this case and conducted our own investigation. great britain was to isolate the soviet union as much as possible because of european affairs. this was, of course, a huge mistake of the british conservatives, because the development of the european order is possible only with the participation there in russia . they kind of start, but it's interesting. here, yes.