but as for the stones of christianity, again, i say first for all who are interested, christianity, and that is strikingly paradoxical. that it is built on the defeat, so to speak, of the one whom we worship christ, because in worldly life he suffered a complete defeat in worldly life since christ was crucified, mocked and killed everything in the worldview of a worldly person. he lost , he totally lost, his life was a total

failure. he allowed himself to be judged unfairly. he allowed himself to be blamed, so to speak. he allowed himself to be tortured kill. yes, how could they say so, they tortured him, spat and so on, but in a paradoxical way, which for me, among other things , confirms the divine nature of everything that happened in a paradoxical way. this worldly defeat has become a spiritual victory has become a spiritual victory and the cross is an instrument of shameful execution. it became a symbol of a huge, so to speak , huge community of christians, which then turned the world upside down, turned the world upside down, and this must be understood by those who today renounced, including their own. e means roots. i mean the same europeans. yes in that among them, they have ceased to understand these things, therefore, as for us orthodox, you know, i do not exclude that material defeat. and i think that they will give them gifts and expel them from the lavra even if they have to make the most disgusting sacrifices, because i said in the last program. i believe that there are many mentally normal people among

the persecutors, yes, who enjoy this sadistic pleasure, like a sadist enjoy the torment of the victim, if the victim asks for forgiveness or tries there so they take pleasure in destruction. uh, it means orthodox christians, because like, well, they don't resist, physically and so on, but you know, i think that uh, maybe, and i'm pretty sure even to say so. here is the possession of stones, and, as it were, a material defeat. this is their mockery and outrage. it will eventually become our spiritual victory, and their spiritual defeat. and this is important again. for those who doubt, indeed in the meanings of this occurs the meaning of these religious religious inside this, this is the conflict of other kyu-pchevsk lavra, well, many are non-believers or not orthodox. yes, what do we need what white before us, my friends, the important thing is that in this conflict, as if parochial, spiritual content is manifested. this whole process, really absolutely, fallen away from god come on, we are now

practically a deliberate generation fallen from god, worshiping evil and western perversion. civilization is fighting with us, which, for all its so to speak, cannot be without perfection and some kind of curvature errors. well i don’t know, somehow they ended up on the right side. and this is important, it is important to understand this, because everything else is money tanks and that's it. it's all around it, but inside there will still be spiritual things that you can't touch with your hands. and it's important to understand what's going on. and that's what i wanted to say in the first place. well, the second turn is to allow yourself to move out, yes, on a logical track and say a few words literally ah about china and here is the statement of the representative of the chinese ministry of defense. eh, it's very important. and yes, there are a lot of all kinds of such chinese bows, but nonetheless. he pointed out an interesting thing, the army. and china, together with russia, is ready to fight for global justice, but these are not random words.

this is not just words, this is what it says. it says that china has realized or is in the process of realizing that a globally truly global project can only remain with russia and in no other way. by the way, here i am on your program too. eh, repeatedly. here is his opinion on about china i personally believe that china was not a global project. he says china was global, he didn't have this project. and now at the time of testing. there is a chance for a real global project, but alone he cannot be he, by the way, as he cannot be. and that he alone and russia is such a historical era, and moreover, and moreover, no one has ever been able to carry it out alone by the americans. well, for example, let's say what would happen to the americans. if not controlled europe, how would they act now. it would be much harder than the soviet union the soviet union became a global power and became only after the forty-fifth year, when it gained

control over half of europe and on a huge number of countries in the world, so to speak , countries from other parts of the world, it is extremely difficult to deal with a truly global project, not always russia not china would have pulled some water up to this point. yes, even with all the success of the chinese economy and everything else. now here's a chance appears or it will or it will not. i do not know, but such a chance appears and it is historical, it is not about specific people. and i will give the leader to one or another country. this is a historic opportunity. indeed, so to speak, a real e global project. it is interesting, by the way, to say that such a small country as belarus, which in other conditions had no chance, could be related to this benefit of a global project. let's be honest, there is no chance at all to participate in any way in historical process. and now she has such a chance. she got that chance. this is also important for belarusians, by the way, there is a belarusian society inside, there are many

different home-grown oppositionists, too. well, everyone dreamed that they would live like in poland. you can say, listen, my friends, if lukashenka had been demolished in 2020, you wouldn’t have lived like in poland you would now be at war with russia . there was a war on your territory, most likely, yes. or you would be forced, so to speak, to fight with russia along with everyone, and now you have there is a chance to participate in a huge historical project. as by the way, this happened to many national minorities who joined the big russian project historically. many of them were. to an absolute one. well, let's put it this way, it's a very small-town fate. and having joined the huge project of this russia of the historical russian empire, because of the soviet union, representatives of these nationalities and they themselves received a unique opportunity to participate in global historical projects. and this now the last thing is happening, which is also important. this is a statement, but uh, for me, so to speak, it was also interesting. uh, when e sedzapin left, and vladimir putin announced

the preparation of the deployment of tactical weapons in belarus in the western press, including a lot of headlines, they say. yes, look , it means that the deployment of tactical weapons in belarus contradicts china’s proposals , china had one of the proposals. let's say nuclear weapons will be a national border. and now they quarrel, right at before our very eyes, the speech of representatives of the ministry of defense completely refuted the fact that in fact this level, the level, so to speak, of coordination of efforts, it is much deeper. moreover, as far as nuclear weapons are concerned, lukashenka also traveled there. well, that's how you say it. well, here is the speech of this representative. e about this this is evidenced by the fact that there is a big risk in cutting off china from europe, yes. and apparently, china has not yet realized it, but for europe, in fact. it's no less of a risk. this no less risk, because it is death, yes , because they have already cut off from russian resources, now they are cut off from china with its goods and its market, so the situation here is mutual, but it ends with the fact that this is true, yes, sometimes contradictory.

yes, having a lot of, so to speak, risks. yes , as if absolutely not ideal, but really a historical chance for a real global project for two and conceptually. by the way, i agree with this, i also spoke about this philosophically, russia has the role of leader here . well, with a small remark. having commented on what was being said here , the lady will receive a reprimand along the party line. of course, now richard was grenella. there is no one there to correct the american embassy. remember, she corrected the chancellors when he was ambassador there, but the fact is that in the united states they interpret not some key ones, that the united states saved the eastern hemisphere from the germans and japanese militarists. here are the german fascists and the japanese militarists. is this the general is not some kind of

great britain great britain is buggy, if it were not for the arsenal democracy, if not for their 50 destroyers and so on, so the united states is interpreting. only in this way i do not mean serious scientists. i mean, here's what's going on massively in the media thing, a second self-democracy. well, i envy oleg , you see that he was able to read to the end and read it, only it wasn’t enough for me, but i looked. hey, who signed? i counted. why 70 liters? they said that now, compared to the first, they themselves were there for democracy then 101 now 123 where 50 states. after all, also in theory, there do not finish reading. there should also be growth there, where did it go, antigua and barbuda, tonga and other democracies. they are not there in the list , they are not there, that is, they could not drive everyone away, but the fact is that in parallel, in parallel

, we do not notice this in parallel. or rather, in hainan, a forum is being held in fact the same as the eastern economic forum, where there is crystal. georgieva in general, representatives of one of the e, globalized institutions of the institutions that promoted the globalization of the imf says that that and this year, a third of the growth will be chinese. here is the total world growth. a third will be chinese chinese. they gathered, of course, less than the state, but they gather here those who they have, who they are interested in, about fifty. and line up i do not agree, but china has been on a global project. it concerned first the eastern hemisphere. it is like a figure eight loop, one loop swept up to europe - this is one belt. one way xi jinping's second was - this is, uh, regional regional all sergeevich economic a partnership that spanned the pacific,

and then in this case. even before the first world war, before the second world war, the americans always interpreted that this consolidation of the eurasian space should not be allowed. china is on this show and now for china, of course, it is very important at the present time. i agree here that russia is very serious for him. she didn't just say so back. there covers russia is a power component of the deuce. because china yes, he is the economic power of course, it is economic power, but militarily not by chance. the chinese military say such words, because militarily we are now providing china, in any case , with cover that prevents the americans from unleashing a direct open conflict against it. although only yesterday the destroyer passed again near the parasai islands, silent wine is in washington , they did not want to meet with her. biden there,

representatives of the administration - this is the president of taiwan with her did not want to meet with her only meets on the map kevin mccarthy he will date her. not a biden, not a blinkin inside a person. yes, the third person in the country meets. well, as if here they decided that come on, then they won’t reach it. in any case, china is looking at this and, of course, those moments of the war are very important for it. wearing in economic terms , it is very simple here ursula vonderlein, you can call her whatever you like. she would go in order to, in principle, she is an atlanticist to the brain of the conste of the atlantic, they are german. she is not european. she is an atlanticist, she will move in perform a general stop. the general setup is that there is a european puddle thrown there. it was this russian stone that sprayed in two directions.

most of the european business began to fly to the united states, but not a small part went to china, this cannot be allowed, because technology will also go there, and much more , and what ursolov talks about at the end by the end of this year, we will develop an economic security strategy , that is , the european commission, the informal government of the european union will develop an economic security strategy. what are we talking about? this is most likely just about the fight against uh, china first of all with china and the chinese also notice this on this wonderful one. the democracy summit was such anders foc ramos, remember, yes, he headed nato, now he comes up with the idea of ​​​​an economic nato , but not in the way that we once said we would build, that hillary clinton spoke about, that is, the trans-atlantic free trade area. and you to us we must create a block that will remind nato with its fifth article, that is, in other

words. we must develop a certain code of rules against whom and how the males apply, and these sanctions will have to automatically enter into all those states that enter there and , accordingly, automatically provide assistance to those strange ones against whom measures will be taken. and remember china has taken action against the two states that have done it so far, how jarring the entire european union. at one time, china simply deleted litvusk from its customs tariff. there is no such code, there is no such state, and it all hit the european union hard, because they realized that with any country, maybe, uh, also china can do the same at the same time to whom australia can help , for example, australia, which also got under chinese sanctions. now they are negotiating to at least partially ease these sanctions, but all the same

, this is an idea to create a certain bloc, such as a military one, which will also develop the conditions for the struggle against the economic giant, that is to surround us they surrounded us now it is necessary to press, when to press, well, it is clear that sans is now secondary sanctions and the like, but it does not work. here is the pressure. holes pop up all the time. that's where mexico , india and israel did not agree with certain positions of other countries. these well-known hmm stars do not agree with this, and most importantly, that the united states with the american elite is not accidental. here he brought these small states from him. hmm, in general, i respect it. yes. these are, uh, the countries of the caribbean, there, oceania, which in in general, the main industry is tourism. i have nothing against them, but the americans have always rounded them up in order to catch up with

the number of votes. you need to know the number of voices that come out with an anti-chinese , anti-russian, and another pro-american position, that they cannot do this now and already. this is a very serious problem that really brings us together with china, this is c- they are still continuing this and how how how to solve this problem without a military component in the united states, in my opinion, i don’t know, me too honestly tried to read. uh, the policy document is for democracy themselves, but it stuck and mentally crossed somewhere on the third page, because between each line these all the notorious marines seemed to be, and with rainbow flags, but it very much reminds e of gianni radar's books, a about the distortion of concepts and about the complete substitution of concepts is again recalled in the mri - this is with

its fourteenth fourteenth markers of historical fascism. we're from the main who was so-called neo-yaz and completely uh, flipping on upside down fundamental concepts. here you read even the preamble. there first page with er, the development of freedom security prosperity. is that it, they are straits about cancer progoslaving about ukraine about grenada about panama about vietnam about afghanistan about other 72 or 58 countries that could not be driven away this time. eh, the only thing that is written there? honestly, without these here, we turn the stop on its head. it 's transgender equality and so on and so forth. probably it was the highest e, goals and the highest m-th highest achievement of this document, in fact, displays really anti-humanly such a transhumanistic or, to say the least, frank satanic essence. uh, western here is this pseudo-democratic water, by the way, about democracy as a phenomenon, it had a good

effect earlier, where democracy is water. she is not kingdomless. well, at least the democracy that we are now seeing in the performance of the anglo-saxon world. and what is happening with the lavra, and in general with orthodoxy in ukraine well, these are all such simulators of what the europeans did with their christianity, starting from the 18th century, since the time of the french revolution, the most massive extermination of priests was the cabins in france, then it spread to other countries. and now, in the same france, it comes to the fact that the old cathedrals there are of the 19th century. they just demolish it or give it to other communities there. at best , as in germany er, many churches, such as the greek orthodox church of munich, are now housed in a former catholic cathedral. some churches. there e russian orthodox church abroad. also got the buildings of the former catholic. uh, because europeans walk around the hallway corny. in particular, the masses write a statement

about leaving the church community, because germany has, uh, a church tax and you have to depending on whether you are a protestant or a catholic. here, in order not to pay, they, accordingly, even officially have to write the appropriate statements, and the crisis of godlessness, to which florensky berdyaev wrote. ilyin, he, in principle, is already echoing around with this already frankly anti-human e approach of transhumanism, who, uh, can call him, probably the eugene of the 21st century, what hitler’s nazis dreamed of breeding a superman of a new strong type of people, this is actually now being declared by these strange creatures with deviant behavior that cities call themselves. almost the most progressive breed of mankind. this is eugenics for the 21st century. only with such a very extremely unpleasant odor in this respect. e words of the speaker of the german bundestag in fact. yes, you can laugh at him, but even the king of charms i cried out of emotion, but really very bright genetic trace of britain

in the distribution of precisely the classical european is not easy. sir oswaldsley of europe, head of the british union of fascists , a very influential large organization in great britain, the current neo-nazis are the european home of the skinhead movement and for them a style icon in quotation marks. this is an englishman. i'm stuart, who led the grouping of european british skinheads there and who is still almost legislative maud. uh, respectively, it is british nazism racism. it really became the most structured and classic version. this is the ideology of the superman, who later on the page of his e, works shifted nice, respectively, here everything fits into a single logical puzzle. uh , the degradation of european civilization, indeed the decline of europe, about which ender wrote that now we are seeing all this. as for, but this uh, how would sergey say china's global approach in my opinion, he never aspired to uh,

globality to globalism. uh, globalism is still the destiny of the anglo-saxons, the highest value of china is itself, china, respectively. yes, he is a middle empire, he is in the center of the world, he does not need to strive to have his own trading post colonies there all over the world, and so he is the world certainly now. uh, the current situation is global. she dictates that china hmm must rely on an ally who will cover if necessary. you and the resource rear, because really now that's what else ms. gynecologist said, that 98% of rare land metals, europe comes from china, this should be put an end to, therefore, australia plays such a key role not only in the pacific nato well, in this eight of economic nato, because here , in fact, a military military bloc and economically will be hand in hand, respectively, because of australia they will go , rare earth metals. instead of chinese, respectively, therefore, australia

receives nuclear submarines as a privilege. and this is the same not notorious. the spread of atomic weapons is already here again, two powerful blocks of confrontation and poles of confrontation are invested, respectively, on the one hand, europe on the other hand, southeast asia , that is, respectively, eurasia, the eurasian continent as an anti-anglo-saxon mood and , accordingly, such an octopus in the form of the anglo-saxon world, which is trying on all sorts of pain points uh, to strike both militarily and economically ideologically, as we saw on this notorious sammet, in this way the world really is now with arena of global cooperation i'm sorry for not cooperation. confrontation. e two. eh, powerful e. hmm, even these are not blocks , this is a worldview, if, relatively speaking, xx passed under the banner of blocks, that is, now there is a confrontation of the worldview. hmm, position , lifestyle and attitude, besides, i looked

at dates. most buzzwords germany will never forget the contribution that the memory. they were also flagships. they, too, in relation to russia, they will say, we will never forget, they quickly forgot the contribution that russia came to free us. and how they are all as one. greeted only one word ridge was not heard. well , as if in the old days, bay of christ unanimously applauded this i can’t. well, nothing, those who have a weak memory, when they can bring it to the point that they wake her up a little and

disturb her so that they don’t remember. here's everything else about russia and china. and why did china have to come out in support of russia then ? and that russia has enough strength and spirit? now, when china realized that russia has enough strength and enough spirit to stand up for your rights. then they are ready to work with this russia, and with russia , which itself does not know what it will do, it is unlikely that anyone will go a little bit different about the fact that china on these

issues did not take any anti-american position, it stood in the country that you support had no one to deal with then, and he himself will not go, he will cope. so many things in the world. well, they look completely different. right now, the world has begun to shout; with the assistance of china , saudi arabia, iran was talking about diplomatic relations. how is it a gift? and that's why they did it in china . but these negotiations, that is, the fact that they were held for two years, speaks of what

happened to both countries. it was their national interest to reach an agreement. who interfered with this interest? yes, in the middle east, when the influence of the united states fell, it turned out that it was possible to agree. the americans are getting out, weakening in syria, and in syria, you can agree anywhere , anywhere on the globe. when the americans remove their dirty hands, then you can negotiate. but while they are sitting there give. in relation to china leave 20 years to the conclusion to further develop it tests.

when he stood up as a cretaceous power, he entered this arena as a world power now , because it turned out that there is a traditional world power that also recognizes itself as a world power, and it is ready to establish an order together with china that will allow china to become on a par with it a world power and therefore more than once or twice emphasized that we are talking on an equal footing. world power held, china we look each other, please, in the eyes, and not in the way he wanted, that is, a strong russia, it is a guarantee that they will conclude an agreement with this agreement between china and

russia on changing the world order . that the policy that russia is now pursuing will be successful. that russia is a successful state and this is what gives russia is the answer to all these cries that go in the west, that russia is about to collapse and now we will defeat it, and when they say no, you will not win. if you had a chance, we would not have gone with russia since we went with russia

, which means you are sure that russia will win in ukraine and it will win not only in ukraine , it will win everywhere. it will be with her, and china will be snowing, because russia china is right only a representative of the chinese army. he said. the head of china says our relationship is more than an alliance, and he says, no, it's something like that, it's less he decides because of him. and er here is this policy here is what happens when china decided to become a world

power all the problems. he consider in global sense. and therefore the conflict in ukraine is for him this part of the global conflict and he is looking for a global solution and in a global solution, he goes with russia a global solution that will ensure security for russia as well. that is, it is completely different, the meaning of which is these pygmies?