[000:00:00;00] approach what is an integrated approach, this is the stimulation of russian manufacturers and the purchase of equipment in friendly countries, the facilitation of its import from certification and the optimization of parallel import procedures, next week the senators will discuss the improvement of mechanisms for providing patients with severe chronic diseases with drugs. procedural law and legal proceedings will discuss the legal regulation of the sphere of passenger transportation and the application of domestic software security. a large group of senators led by the heads of the committees will visit karachay -cherkessia and hold an off-site meeting on the issues of the integrated socio-economic development of the republic . we continue to follow the most important events in the federation council

. see you in a week in the senate program. hello. i am alexander koretsky, as always, on friday evening we sum up, most importantly, the political and economic results of the outgoing week. an extraordinary meeting of the un security council was held today russia's plans to deploy tactical

nuclear weapons in belarus began earlier , president vladimir putin said that moscow and minsk agreed, without violating international obligations, to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in belarus, which caused a strong reaction in the west. and the united states and the european union expressed concern about the fact that from april 1, russia will replace mozambique as chairman of the un security council, which we are talking about, we will talk about this with the first deputy permanent representative of russia at the un in new york by dmitry polyansky dmitry alekseevich hello , let's start today's meeting, probably, have something to say? what were they discussing? why did this question arise? today's meeting, in fact, became, uh, another blatant manifestation of double standards, uh, of our former western partners, since they raised the issue of plans to deploy, uh,

russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, which was announced, but at the same time, naturally, they tried not to replace these actions with aggressive, uh, which undertaking has been undertaking and has been undertaking the nato bloc for many years. uh, including the deployment of us nuclear weapons on the territory of a number of european states. today we did not let them silence this topic. uh, they said that this factor plays a decisive role. as regards the security of the european continent, and we have always been called upon, the united states to withdraw its nuclear weapons, but western colleagues , of course, interpret everything that happens in their favor, that is, nuclear weapons are good nuclear weapons. some of our plans it's natural, bad plans for them what they can in no way be allowed to us, so uh, frankly, uh, the speech that we

heard today they were absolutely unconvincing. and rather they seemed to try. e wind up. e, and so to speak e to present in some favorable light what nato is doing and try. uh, present the situation in such a way that it is russian actions that provoke international tension, but we gave a detailed answer. to this we chronologically showed all the violations, uh from the side united states and various international treaties on strategic stability, and in general there was even some controversy with the representative of the united states , who again tried everything, and turned words upside down. and again he answered our simple question. we asked him if there are american nuclear weapons in europe or not? that's what he preferred to this question. don't answer. uh, americans usually try not to talk about it dmitry alekseevich well, this is a well-known fact that historical schools teach about this. well no, probably not.

in the western. what is there to hide here? well, they have weapons there and have been there for decades since the second world war. and why is it such a taboo a and a, how do the other security members react to this? well, most of the members of the security council expressed general wishes that weapons should not be on the territory of other states. our chinese partners said this, referring to the recent russian-chinese joint statement adopted at the level of heads of state and western countries. this was pointed out to the same document, but again forgetting to say what is contained there, e's call to all states to withdraw their nuclear weapons from the territory of other states. here, basically. it was from outside, developing countries, general calls for disarmament to reassure that the situation has gone too far, many sincerely said

that dialogue is needed. in general, this topic, which western colleagues wanted to raise, sounded somehow muffled from the very beginning. uh, probably, the task was to put russia in such an unfavorable light, but it seems to me that this is not got arguments. we brought much more. and in general it seemed to me that since initially it was so to say, the meeting itself was for the last ukraine almost a week ago, and then only we will support it with western countries. it seemed to me that it was generally embarrassing for them to discuss the topic, because for them it is not so handy for setting up security , it is not difficult to raise it without exposing it. uh, actually double standards and actually aggressive actions. well, it's definitely difficult here with you. disagree here. well, what is called a knight in the cannon of the americans, so, of course, they are not very willing, but nevertheless you know this one. one gets the feeling that, and the tail is still wagging the dog, yes, and the ukrainian authorities. uh, that's how they try to influence the

americans. and although we all perfectly understand who is here, uh, whose dog's tail and everything else, but nonetheless. and this same question now about here is with 1 april. we must become the chairmen of our own security. there are some discussions on this subject here. i so understand that the reaction is the concern of the white house, as usual, there and so on. well, the reaction is quite strange, i would be concerned that they are the type of concern that they express, uh , at briefings in the series that we regret that russia, uh, is a permanent member of the security council, regret that i take over the chairmanship. well, little that they regret, there is international law. they used to uh, think uh within. uh, the so-called order based on the rules that they formulate and that others must just they like this order blindly. they fulfill it in western countries and formulate something they don't like, they change it themselves as they want. now they don't want

russia to be representatives of the security council well, there's not enough that they don't want, we work according to the charter. everything is clearly spelled out there, how and how it is determined, and there it is our turn, uh, and they have already recognized and have long been recognized at home by people that nothing can be done about it, unless you undermine, but the foundations of the existence of the un a this it will just be another organization if someone dares to encroach on such foundations. uh, laid down since the end of world war ii, so today, in general, it ’s enough. it seems to me that, uh, out of shape, there was a ukrainian representative. uh, our address has entered the usual electives. uh, because he understands that, so to speak, tomorrow is april 1st and nothing can be done. not ukraine nor western collegiums. they cannot, in order to prevent us from becoming the head of the security council, we

have already prepared our program for the third april vasily alekseevich ninja, uh, will hold a press conference for russian foreign journalists , primarily accredited to the un, but online, as i understand it, it will be possible to participate in it, and we will present, uh, in detail, the program of our chairmanship and respond. eh, all questions. well, dmitry alekseevich, i understand, i will not ask you questions, but what will it consist of? that is, with this program, because it is clear. what, yes it will be, the official press conference, it is logical, and then we we'll hear everything. ah, well, nonetheless. that's if you return. please remind our dear viewers. and what is the meaning? e post security chairman, well, in a nutshell, literally, so that there is an understanding what is it about? well, well, the chairman of the security council, and he is, in general, the first among equals. so let's say he doesn't have any special powers , but he formulates a program of work for everyone. that is, he proposes, how to conduct a meeting, to whom to give the floor, who to invite,

who not to invite, uh, and with his filing a whole the security council has been working for a month, on the one hand, it seems to be such a rather not so important function, but on the other hand, we have seen it many times over the past time. what a strong influence the chairman of the security council can have on the work of the security council. here is primarily by invitation not by invitation of any parts. uh, on acceptance for consideration of some letters or not, uh, all the actions of representatives of the security council, they can be challenged, but by members of the security council, and so to speak, such cases happen, and we also disputed some moments. well, i can remember the first of the most egregious, uh, absolutely situations. this is unprecedented when a year ago, uh, after we requested an emergency meeting of the security council on the provocation in bucha. that's how it was put, uh, by the british, who in april of last year were simply chairmen.

they refused to tell us that it was decided that it was not urgent. uh, holding this meeting, this topic can be considered together with another topic , that's understandable in order to wrap it up like this to say precisely our submission of this e, the events of this crime, as a provocation, and we , of course, disputed this, but taking into account the fact that there are a lot of western states in the council and a procedural vote on this matter is possible. it wouldn't help us. uh, we couldn't get the british to hold this meeting after all. yes, i mean that they, as chairmen, took advantage of this. here is our position and the national interests of the entire western camp, and uh, we wrapped up this issue with our meeting, uh, naturally. we do not intend to enter. uh, our previous presidency fell on a very difficult period for us. it's just february last year. you can imagine how it developed, at the end of the month everything is unexpected. eh, and how many problems we had, including with requests and with some

initiatives, but we worked honestly, we did not allow ourselves. uh, so to speak, nowhere to go beyond this neutrality, uh, which is implied here by the chairman in the conduct of general affairs, uh, security councils. i'm sure, that it will also be this time and those who know us well have no doubts about it, therefore all this is pure politics and some pure castles in the air of certain people, uh, who, of course, how to say, want to see a slightly different picture of the world. but that's actually their problem. eh, nothing else. yes, dmitry alekseevich is huge for you. thank you. we certainly will not take examples from the other members of the security council. eh, and we will conduct our own policy, as it is customary in our country to be honest objectively especially for you. thank you for finding time, but for us i will remind. we talked with dmitry polyansky, first deputy permanent representative of russia to

the un in new york today, the president signed a decree approving a new concept of the country's foreign policy security council and governments, and we will talk about the main theses of this document with a scientific head of the faculty of world economy and world politics, and honorary chairman of the presidium of the council on foreign and defense policy, honored professor sergei karaganov of the higher school of economics , i am glad to welcome you. thanks for taking the time, seriously. good evening, which was adopted today , there is something to discuss with you, unfortunately, not much time, because it is a global topic. well, nevertheless. here, let's start dancing from the stove, and the president said that major changes were required because

it had changed. in life, i will convey these words in a simple way. what are these changes, in your opinion, here are a few theses literally. it came to the surface, long ago, developing the process of the west's desperate struggle to maintain its positions, to which it has been losing for about uh, there are different calculations, well, exactly 15 years. uh. the west has moved on. uh, open counteroffensive. uh, trying to maintain the positions that he held due to his military superiority of the last five centuries in world, imposing their culture. e their economic interests are political, but first of all, of course. eh, this dominance

provided an opportunity. now he has stopped. this system started to change to and it caused a giant surge. uh, counteracts with his sides. this is the main thing, e trend. that is , this is how the position appeared. here are all the global problems, although they are constantly chatted about. but these problems are not being solved, moreover, they are growing social contradictions, changes and deterioration of the environment, and simply inequality and food. well, that's it, almost everything, it's not these problems that can't be solved. it's all come to the surface right now, because for a very long time we thought that there, or we had a false

agenda, for example, you say the main problem is bread, the main problem on the main one has hit a lot and they are not being solved by the climate. uh, was one of the problems that we wanted to replace those very main problems now, it is not possible now, uh, the west that is trying to maintain its e positions and not break up special. eh, went to the pumping. well de facto, uh, the military yes, the atmosphere in the world, especially in relations with russia well, in a protective degree. uh, with china well, that's the main thing to change. well, it’s clear that the west started doing all this earlier , but at first it sharply accelerated our own, but all these pressures on us revelation of the neck, and the robbery of our assets and so on, and this behavior, which m-m

still recently, no one even, probably, could even conceive of this form of behavior with which western diplomats behave. if you can still call them that, and so on. we are a lot we see e examples a and yet change the concept, which was said today announced. e, and e is spelled out. what do you think, uh, well, let's criticize a little bit our uh, responsible persons in this matter. what was wrong? why did you need to change something? well, let's put it quite simply . we've been the last 30 years. uh, oh well, 300 have been western centrist europe inland, and the last 15 uh 20 years, especially intermediaries 15-20 years. this is europe centrism and western centrism. e, who once us, by the way, speaking, helped to modernize without

, uh, integration into oneself, uh, many european, but spiritual and material, but did not create a thug. uh, so brilliant, u literature and, probably, u so magnificent , the army, as in which the truth has long ago e transfused and our most of our western collegiums, but in recent years, the orientation to the west has been the orientation has come. the incoming world is an orientation that still largely remains. she even in this document sounded very funny, it resonated with me. although i support the documentary, we say that we will restore the ice stop relations with the west on a mutually respectful basis, on what mutually respectful basis we can restore relations with the west, they still do not represent everything after what we

finally saw. uh. or rather, what some saw, while others did not want to see. i've seen everything here. how can you find out. sorry, but, in my opinion, many do not want to, but from our establishment, so to speak. see it so far. they say well it's some temporary. we have problems here, they will be solved, and we will start to live again as before, including, uh, the concept of foreign policy, as well as many other actions, uh, recognized by a in order to reformat uh and modernize thinking. uh, these are the people that you are talking about who have become hopelessly uh, either mentally or worse. uh, but they turned out to be mental or even economic cobradors of coprods - this is, uh. fa phenomenon is born. uh, outside, bowed

not to the colonial era. and when to the local the bourgeoisie served. uh, hmm related to these crown catered uh colonial or there is no young. here we are from this. damn, well, this process, of course, is not easy, it goes very quickly. and sergey alexandrovich, is he really going at all? very fast very fast. i assure you. i see it, but i know, i see it, it's just in public uh uh one of them in public on how they say they write. um, well, i compare it with what was still very recently. many people resist, because it's really 300-odd years of inertia. e of peter's time, which, e, there was intuitive was negative, and from europe they not

only accepted many beautiful things. communism should have been accepted. uh, thanks to them for this , whose was not accepted by liberalism, which thank you lord did not accept fascism, it's all to change to european and western. eh? well , here's the problem for you, which of them we come up with there, and we implement them with our e, traditional activity, and we rake. sorry for this all the time. here is the question. can you come up with something of your own, finally now we are doing this. this is a rather complicated process, because indeed, mentally , we have been er, er, at the tail of da western civilization for very long years, which is sluggish. well, this is a challenge for us. well, thank god uh, we finally, uh, felt this challenge, by the way, one of the uh, okay goals of the uh

special military operation from my point of view, uh, is, of course, uh a reformatting of the thinking of the russian elite and russian society. although russian society is not so western one new horizons, of course, is the development of our country's civilization understanding that you are a civilization of civilization and, uh, naturally. returning home, that is, the understanding that we are a great eurasian power and we can’t be another hmm, because if it weren’t for our campaign in asia that the dashing cossacks undertook there, they spoke completely incomprehensibly, yes, so that it led, because they did not enrich themselves, but nevertheless

this gigantic territory. e siberia e was not in russia, she would not have survived on e, eastern european, the army would become, uh, an independent state of civilization. yes, yes, sorry i interrupted you. i just mean that the unconditional acceptance of the concept, oh, that was mentioned today is enough. well, an active uh step in the direction, as it were, they already said awareness and who we are, in fact, we are still part of the west third rome or there the tenth rome or some. here we have now. i understand the concept we are the third rome well that 's better than nothing at all or you don't agree we have some other alternative. we there let's say yes we are a state

of civilization, not tracks. that we er and rotate, of course. and and the third rome was still, uh, the concept is quite curious. yes, but it was still the concept of russia in europe. but now it is a completely different concept. we civilization is interesting. well, come on, i agree with you, and we also have political experts who also say that we have unconditionally run into this europe. europe is a great civilization. no one disputes the technology that created the technosphere europeans, including with the help of our people, after all, uh, radio we are the first to actually tv. we are helicopters and that's it. the rest is a lot of things that russian scientists came up with. well, they implemented it in the west. these are

the facts that are not surprising here, but we are unique and the only ones in the world. there in america, the people always win. we are the people of warriors, this is our huge competitive advantage, and we are the people of gigantic spaces, and the people who managed to create this territory with countless resources, which, uh, which ensure our future , we will preserve them and we will use them correctly , we are different and completely we are not european countries. we once went, uh, to europe because in some historical period. i can explain for a long time why, while we lagged behind europe and peter rushed to use, uh, the first teaching, of course, the military and, uh, the actual

technological technologies, eh, but this orientation was outdated a long time ago and certainly completely outdated by the last just food way in the last 20-30 years, when e part ours. gents of uh society, tired of tired of uh, not bad bad food and bad and bad household life. i absolutely do not understand everyone that in what kind of world was we attracted ourselves for communist unanimity, because we were not very rushed to the west. it was absolutely enchanting idiocy that it was here, but 30 years old. eh, well, the eighties, i remember, i was just tired and relaxed. well, what to do? stop anything is never possible. well, perhaps we should have understood

what the west really is, and not a picture, which was painted in hollywood well, or, of course, there was a high standard of living at the expense. what did he want and so on. we already know this very well, but they say, well, they have such an organized democracy there. they don't know how to work. and we are all here idlers and we do not have democracy, so we live worse. this is how it was explained to us, in fact, it is not so. it's a misfortune, well democracy is one of the most effective ways to govern. it has always perished, but we have so far reaffirmed democracy - this is also a remnant of that the operation itself. by the way, speaking in this document, democracy is not used. there, democracy is needed or is it democracy, it is necessary to give birth that i am in society , where they are useful democracy is one of the ways to manage the oligarchies, that is, the ruling ones, no matter how they are called elites, but is it difficult for societies when oligarchs, when democracy?

uh, when e society is in a difficult situation, democracies immediately perish, they always perish in history, the last medieval democracy, by the way, perished, as far as i remember with us. there's time already democracy was not revived at first britain and now they are dying again. but for some reason, again, we yearn for the moon, because we weren't very up to now, and you don't think it's a democracy. this is the top. ah, the human organization. it is not true. yes , sergei alexandrovich that's for sure. well, you know , after all, we really need it to the end . this document, which today, uh, was signed by the president. i hope he will give an active direction, already registered there, but nonetheless. he will give just the start of this one. e even not discussions, but an understanding of who we are, you know who we are, we are talking with you now, and our colleagues are showing our guys with

white armbands. i 'm going to say a little seditious thing here. and why are we with white armbands of a white armband - these are no common colors, maybe we will bring it all the same, and other guys with red armbands. maybe we will still put things in order here, finally in the signs and symbols that, as smart people say, rule the world. you know, this, firstly, is still a maximum more than a profession, but we it's really time to start living your own mind. e be more educated more energetic. we are more logical. e we are more daring. we are stronger. we are not all right now. that's why they don't like us. here you need to stop now, also smart yourself, uh, which we can easily stand up if we become independent. yes, sergey alexandrovich well, we have touched on such deep topics, but, unfortunately, we have run out of airtime for you. thanks for taking the time and for sure the questions we raised. i think

everyone subconsciously asks himself this question. the main thing is to answer. who are we really. thank you, we spoke with the scientific director of the faculty of world economy and world politics. e of the higher school of economics by the president of the council on foreign defense policy, honored professor sergei karagam. march 31 , a memorable date in the military history of russia on march 31 , 1814, the capture of paris, russian troops led by emperor alexander triumphantly entered paris after a bloody battle.