[000:00:00;00] phew, the shelling has not disappeared, most of the plant has been stopped, the only option is to continue to protect the nuclear power plant , otherwise the consequences may be irreversible . we just listen and emphasize. most importantly, see you soon. see you

on the air international review nuclear horizons expanding missiles as the basis of deterrence strength test money illusion everyone knows this, but many they still can't believe it, and as long as this is the case, inflation will continue to rise until we reach total nothingness in the current diabolical dance of numbers , there are still winners and losers , we know that there is no absolute gain we can, but we would not want to be among

the definitive losers filled with ironic hopelessness roman black obelisk germany exactly 100 years ago 1923 hyperinflation devours life. the impoverished population demands justice, the radicals gain points wasn't that what he was thinking about when he recently spoke to vladimir putin about the biggest changes in 100 years? nightmares of the roaring twenties shift changes between the world wars, god forbid, but socio-political tensions are growing everywhere only in recent days the largest strike in germany since the 20th century society from israel

vgtrk correspondent sergey pashkov in the past monday, when hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets, when traffic stopped and the airport closed, when they worked, banks and shopping centers or the vice-mayor of a seaside israeli city, ashdod went with everyone to the central square. in ashdod, when they already started, that is , at first it was in the center and well, you can’t get there. i don't know how people get. i 'm afraid to even think about it. something down there hundreds of thousands of people or several hundred thousand cars in some kind of radius. i don't even know how to get there when they are waiting for you somewhere , it has already begun to be carried out with us, that is, i went there funny lensky has been living for a quarter in the west bank, jordan, his village of koa is located in the territory in which the international community considers palestinian. he also went to the rally every week, but it was

a rally. yes , supporters of netanyahu and the reforms he is carrying out gathered near the building of the knesset jerusalem, but they have already gathered , they have already proved that they have already held several large major demonstrations of several hundred thousand people about this, though the media is not that they are silent, but greatly underestimate the numbers, while the left is overestimated, but certainly if desired, uh, there are enough forces to flood all the streets of all cities. a civil conflict that threatens to turn into hand-to-hand combat was stopped at the last minute by netanyahu. he announced a pause in lawmaking and invited the position to find a compromise at the negotiating table, the ax street was empty, but the claims and distrust of each other remained. here they are, we have a very cunning politician. one is very experienced for sure. he does. in my opinion. so many. he climbed a lot. she

makes the state of israel and everything and everyone considers him a very big leader in the world and so forth, but today he went off the coil in my understanding, went off the coil, because those personal problems that he has. there are some coalition court problems, because again, he wants to be an example, he will be an example, firstly, so that this does not affect his court case, secondly, he wants power, like any politician , the opposition is sure that benjamin is not daniyahus , combining today the post of prime minister with the status of being on trial, accused in corruption started a legal reform for himself, to make judges including judges of the supreme court of justice of israel wealth more obedient and accommodating supporters of the same incumbent government. such as shloma lensky reproach him with sufficient rigidity and adherence to principles, while accusing the judges of the supreme court of betraying the basic interests of the people

of israel. the karists, already convicted and in prison, turned out to be right. they need to be granted, they need to be pitied, they need to be put in their position. it turns out you can negotiations with the tourist organization. if it is for the good, but it is for the good from the point of view of whom not from the point of view of parliament and government, which did not gather at all, but from the point of view of some group. there professors of doctors of sciences of the elite, and the city dweller, elinakht and the settler walked, the valensky one only in one they do not consider the legal system of israel to be sinless, and the supreme court of justice, fully, corresponding to its name, further differences begin differences in the interpretation of this and justice by the supporters that they myself think reform is needed 100% of the judges who we have definitely do not do that, let's say

so. which we the inhabitants of the majority of the population of israel would expect, because sometimes somewhere they make decisions that are not comparable with our parliament and the desire of the people. somewhere there is such a thing. this also does not mean that now you need to completely break everything. yes, let's fix it. let's get together peak, strikes and demonstrations behind behind closed doors of the presidential office in jerusalem government and opposition representatives they are trying to agree on a compromise , they are trying to combine the incompatible and reconcile those who hated each other yesterday, justice is a strong feeling, it can divide the country into friends and foes, and then people who called themselves brothers can become enemies. and this means that in the hands of the negotiators today, the fate and future of israel today sergey pashkov alexander ivanyuk anastasia demyanets from israel especially for international review.

everywhere has its own prehistory, but the reason is the general feeling of the fragility of the future and the lack of justice in germany 100 years ago precisely after the last because of the defeat in the war, the predatory peace conditions and the incapacity of the government. a demand for the simplicity of radicalism was born. and now the feeling of injustice is spilling over the planet in different countries, communities , age and social groups. soon two subjects kristo komarnicki from bulgaria on the left, a macron-like man yells , go get yourself a job, and the frenchman answers. it's better for you to resign the artist and it's from france who inspires emmanuel macron, the gravestone says 1925 -

2018, although thatcher died for 5 years. previously, the year of the start of protests in france apparently matters here, the provocative german karika tourist orrainer hacklin, on the topic of a strike in germany in france, a man who looks like a macron, says just a small reform, and a child in a stroller at the swedish chancellor answers him. we, too, are on strike in the crap protests against judicial reform and the split in israeli society . the work is briefly titled israeli among themselves. patrick champade on the theme of the crowned the visit to macron due to the strike says the sign of the british king charles iii went to germany and not to france drawing the cancellation of the visit. justice is an infrequent companion of history, but the uneven distribution of benefits, even economic, even political , even cultural, is easier to bear. if there is

an expectation tomorrow will be better than yesterday, the past post-world war ii era and until the recent dawn of liberal globalization is a period of comfort and optimism for a large part of the world's population. but it ended now with a circle of fears, even innovators, who promised that technological progress would solve all problems beats a thousand not the last people in this area, led by elon musk and steve wozniak. they just called to freeze the training of artificial intelligence, it is too dangerous for russia. lord , the human rights of mankind. some even think it's too late. the tectonic shift that the world is experiencing is multifaceted. we will once again return to various aspects of this topic until we confine ourselves to one statement. the creation of a just world is an extremely

complex process, because the interpretation of justice. at to each his own a before we live to and the harmonization of the kaliz. there is plenty for every taste. justice in the sense of justice should be universal, such a view prevailed at the end of the 20th century, the systemic split of the cold war ended. bloody civil strife in europe and africa demanded a response. moreover, life seems to have proved that there is only one correct moral and ethical system and it is based on liberal principles. the international criminal court began its work in 2002, after the entry into force of the rome statute, it formalized the creation of a new judicial body and authorized it to investigate cases of genocide violation of the rules of war or the geneva convention, but the muses are not directly related to it should not be

confused with the international court of justice, which is also located in the hague and is one of the main bodies. un in forty-five. it was created to resolve international disputes or situations that could lead to conflict . it is important that the jurisdiction of the muses extends exclusively to the states that have signed and ratified the rome statute , with the exception of cases where the request makes the un security council in the jurisdiction of musa included 123 countries, but refused to do so more than 40 among them turkeys. china, the united states and russia, with the front two signing the rome statute, but washington withdrew the signature, and russia did not ratify the treaty. in doing so, the united states acts as a consistent critic of the court of american law. it even allows the special services to carry out forceful operations to free us citizens detained on the basis of his

warrant, and donald trump, while he was president , imposed sanctions against his music employees, not has its own police or in general any apparatus of coercion in theory, the state should themselves transfer wanted persons, but there are internal rules of law that allow this not to be done. at the same time, the mousse does not consider cases in absentia, but only after the arrest of the accused, they finance him in approximately the same way as he is. each participating country makes its contribution depending on the population and its income, by the way, there are six participants in the top ten largest donors for 2020. nicknames of the so-called big seven and also austria spain and south korea but there are also voluntary contributions or donations, it is impossible to establish who made it the state or an individual in 20 years. mousse, who received more than one billion euros , registered claims in 139 countries, and opened

an investigation in only eight cases. however, some of them ended in justification. the international criminal court loudly reminded of itself by issuing a warrant for the arrest of the president of russia and the russian commissioner for children's rights , the prosecutor considers the evacuation of children from the war zone a mass kidnapping, that is, military from now on, countries that recognize the jurisdiction of the court are supposedly obliged to arrest the defendants if they find themselves on their territory and transfer them to gaga when it comes to such incidents, of course, there can be no question of any justice outside of politics, but if, in principle a chance for a more or less impartial litigation in a common supranational jurisdiction, one world. it is only available in two versions. at least. uh, so far we are offered two variations. this is either some kind of global

hegemot that will implement jurisdiction throughout the world. and then any international courts. this is, strictly speaking, just the courts of behemons and no, nothing. e new. for us. these are simply analogues of domestic courts. uh, since a world united under a hegemon is simply an analogue of a sovereign state, the second variant of such an order extended to the entire global sphere, this is, for example, if there is, relatively speaking, a certain expansion of the situation with the un general assembly hegemon, will be represented, as it were, by a world parliament, some. ah, this is the second, uh, the second option, which was offered there in the middle of the 2000s in the middle of the 10s. and this is considered such a european version of global international law. e is not under the leadership of any particular state. e. well, then, in fact, the situation does not

change in any way. just conditional. this is not some particular state. they are, well, a certain number of subjects. not only, by the way, it was proposed to exclude states there. and representatives of various kinds, namely the nationality of nations, not necessarily, which formalized as state associations sound like utopia both, especially since the hegemon himself, now rather, former in relation to justice from the outside, takes a tough position, even a special law was adopted to protect us citizens from the attacks of criticism of the international court at the end the nineties in the early 2000s they talked about what we have the us constitution which, in article three , provides that the judicial power is exercised by the supreme court and lower courts being created. i don't have this app interprets. in the literal sense, that us citizens cannot be subject to any other court, except as a matter of fact, created on

the basis of the constitution, why is this so? this question is not exclusively a kind of casuistic interpretation of the idea is that the constitution - it's not just some. a random document is a legal act that the constitution is a form of expression of a social contract, that the constitution continues the idea of ​​​​a war of independence, uh , the declaration of independence of 1776, which primarily enshrines the right of every people, but first of all, the people of the former colonies to self-determination and to design for themselves the political power system that they want, in other words, all power belongs to the people, and in this case to the american people , and all authorities, including the judiciary, must. in the end, to be responsible directly to the american people is a situation where an american citizen is judged, for example, by some national body. well, the same university has a situation in which the decision is made by people who are in front of the american

people do not bear any responsibility and cannot bear. they have nothing to do with american statehood and the american republic, and therefore the opponents of the mousse directly point out that he denies not just the us legal system there. he denies the right to self-government in general, that is, he denies the entire constitutional history of the united states of america. well, there is, of course. , claims also to the purely legal side, because the same constitution provides for everyone to consider the right of everyone, and she a trial involving, for example, a jury, which is, of course, practice. absent. well, it's just that such a procedure is not intended to be examined on the criticism of the court that it provides the citizens of the united states of america with a lesser degree of guarantee in terms of rights and freedoms than the national legal system and therefore in no way. he e cannot be applied to them. in addition

, critics have pointed out the following curious moment. uh, the court procedure in particular on the jurisdiction of the so-called withdrawal, that is, by default, of course, as a general rule. uh, court applies applies its rules to citizens of countries that have signed and ratified the relevant treaty. however, at the same time. it provides for the possibility, on occasion, of a non -party to a treaty, but to accept jurisdiction over a particular case in its territory. the position must be said to sound convincing, but the americans defend such an approach exclusively for themselves . that the united states of america is not just one of the countries is not just one of the nation state is a nation state.

based on certain principles. well, including there, for example, democracy, but the fact is that, for example, the prosecutor of muses or the judge is elected by representatives of the assembly of the countries of the parties to this agreement, among which, for example, there is the central african republic of afghanistan and so on, and it turns out such a situation, that a decision in the end, a handed down by this court will be taken on based on the will of countries that, from the point of view of the united states of america , have nothing to do with democratic values ​​and the like. and so the us believes that they are defending universal values, they are not against meaningful activities, that is , they are not against those values ​​that in turn protect garbage. they simply assume that the structure of this organization is procedural issues related to the formation. uh, there with the composition of the judges and so on. they simply do not defend the universal values ​​that they do.

themselves, the united states of america, therefore, the united states believes that they themselves will be able to protect these values ​​much better than through, for example, these necessary national structures . that is why, when the united states at the very beginning, back in the late nineties, were ardent supporters of this permanent court. well, after uh temporary tribunals. they pointed to one slander that they considered necessary, and the initiation of any proceedings. uh, in this court , only the san security council in that is , the body where the united states has the opportunity just veto any decision and hence. this way they can limit it. uh, the likelihood that not democratic countries, for example, but can influence the adoption of appropriate decisions regarding citizens of the united states of america, a situation where, in fact, without the consent of the united states, a situation can be initiated, uh, the next case, the united states is no longer ready to participate in this entire event, then is, in

fact, it is not the defense of sovereignty. somehow whom it is to protect the interests and sovereignty of the united states of america who consider myself. naturally, an exemplary state and believes that they are the very city on the hill, which should, uh, serve as an example for everyone else, and give the right not to democratic countries to judge citizens, but to this exemplary state. well, they just think it's wrong. the first international tribunal was the nuremberg trials or the four powers of the allies of the ussr usa france and great britain on the dock were the highest state military leaders of the third reich almost all found guilty it was not by chance that the city for the tribunal was chosen in nuremberg for the first time the nazi congress was held. racial laws were also adopted here, by analogy, the tokyo

international military tribunal was held on japanese war criminals. in may 1993 , an international tribunal for the former yugoslavia was created, two- thirds of the defendants were serbs, and the defendants were croats. mostly they escaped persecution, the highest-ranking defendants ex-president of yugoslavia sloboda melosevic and his companions did not live up to the verdict a radovan karadzic and rad kabludich sentenced to life. this is the first tribunal that the organizers said was held on behalf of the entire international community. in the ninety-fifth year, the perrorande tribunal was created. he investigated the causes of the genocide, which was organized by the hutu people. against the tutsi people, according to some reports , a murder in the country was committed every 10 seconds, 2/3 of the verdicts turned out to be guilty at the beginning of the 2000s on the initiative. he was established. another international tribunal to investigate

the crimes of the red worlds in cambodia in for 4 years. they are known to have been destroyed by citizens according to various estimates, then from one and a half to three million people died. in 2008 , for the first time, an international criminal court issued an arrest warrant for a sitting president , sudanese leader omar al-bashir was charged with genocide and ethnic cleansing in dar province after the coup. in 2019, he was overthrown and arrested a year later, the new authorities agreed to extradite him to the international criminal court, but so far this has not happened. mousse is a phenomenon of a unique time when it seemed that justice without national reference was about to become a reality. and when it turned out that a single universe, while the previous obligations were being postponed, they became somewhat of a burden. for some, it’s interesting, for example, how the authorities of south africa will behave there in the fall

, the brix themselves, respectively, the arrival of the russian leader formally in south africa , the mousse jurisdiction is recognized, in fact, they even tried to get out of it, but internally politically the twist does not allow, however, when sudanese president omar al-bashir came to south africa for an african summit eight years ago. no one, of course, betrayed him anywhere, there is truth and the pioneers-hero of the constitutional court of armenia precisely. now why is it appropriate to decide that the ratification of participation in the mousse is in accordance with the legislation of the country. there, of course, in their heads is not belokamennaya at all, but the capital of another neighboring state. but all the same, there is nowhere to go further in a timely manner. going for broke the international criminal court, in fact , risks if countries en masse begin to ignore the verdict of the structure and this will end, and the international criminal court. yes, this may be his sentence in that part

that, well, his credibility, can hit. although i must say that he has never been great, especially not. uh, if you look, uh, his sentences are all over. that's how many twenty-plus years of his existence, then there, uh, actually considered doing, in my opinion, more than a third of what he was going to consider most acquittals . and as far as i remember , those that are not exculpatory are there. eh, well, in general, nothing has been done. well, for example, it was here the production is good for now, but then they didn’t have time, okay, here, but in general there’s just e, you look and didn’t show up for the proceedings didn’t show up for sort it out it didn’t show up to sort it out to bury international legal institutions is not worth it. there is simply no need for high expectations, international courts are an indicator of the degree of community integration. if

the community does not have a consensus on how it should be understood. e, for example, some fundamental concepts, whether it be human rights in terms of the limits of their content or e. hmm, what concepts like war and peace, for example, cannot be said, probably that international justice in general will disappear yes, because they are completely separate national entities. yes, it is divided, rather, as if into some blocks, and if it is just some block systems and integration associations, then within these integration associations there should be courts, of course, that will resolve disputes between the participation of these integration associations, as regards relations between these blocs, it also cannot be said that hmm, as this justice will completely disappear, it seems to me that these are situational. points that

created e, in an era, just the domination of national sovereign states in the framework of resolving disputes between them. yes, uh, they are quite applicable to themselves in this case. dmitry anatolyevich medvedev, chairman of the board of trustees of the russian bar association, made his professional contribution to the dispute on jurisdictions. he gave the following legal argument. after advertising. against different types of pain

, pentalgin acts against pain. wherever it is, regardless of the causes of its occurrence , pentalgin will do without the pain of entrepreneurs. uralsib for business prospects wherever you are say, we'll write off the bonuses. yes, dear, it's all right. children, just angels of silence for bonuses, you can lay a route to a million refueling at gazpromneft gas stations, this is not only increased bonuses, but also an opportunity to win 1 million rubles. every week gazpromneft is a stop for those who don't stop

buying. living with prostatitis is hard even harder longidaza helps to reduce inflammation and break down foci of fibrosis longidasa is simply