[000:00:00;00] i didn’t curse anyone at your prayers, but i said the words of the gospel that our tears will not fall to the ground, but will fall on the heads of those who caused these riots inflaming in the russian regions eliminates the consequences of floods fifty residential buildings remain flooded and over 2,000 household plots the level of water in the rivers of bryansk in case of evacuation, prepared temporary accommodation points in the novgorod region on reservoirs explode ice formed by a group of four thousand rescuers. in the established traffic on the section of the m4 highway in in the rostov region at 7:00 am, regular buses were launched the day before after a heavy snowfall, a traffic jam arose for tens of kilometers for drivers and passengers , food and heating points were organized 60 people were evacuated, about 200 turned to

temporary accommodation centers. russia became the chairman of the un security council this position is transferred every month from one member of the security council to another in turn , the chairman appoints a meeting and opens and leads them in this capacity russia plans to discuss security councils, multipolarity risks in the export of weapons, as well as the middle east settlement. new understanding of nuclear security in response to nato expansion russia can deploy its weapons in belarus as well as how to manage world justice and who listens to the decisions of the international criminal court about this, not only look at the international review program immediately after a short advertisement. hello on air international review in the studio fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events

of the week chronicle facts comments my data moods are in vogue again reporting from tel aviv one law for the whole world by what right do you judge the materials of our program? nuclear horizons expanding missiles as the basis of deterrence testing money everyone is an illusion, but many still can't believe it, and while this is the case , inflation will rise until we are reduced to total nothing in the present there is still a devilish dance of numbers, winners and losers we know that we cannot be in absolute gain, but we would not like to be

and among the definitive losers erich maria remarque full of ironic hopelessness roman black obelisk germany exactly 100 years ago 1923 hyperinflation devours life, unhappy population demands justice radicals gain points didn’t he remember this when he recently spoke to vladimir putin about the biggest changes in 100 years . nightmares of the roaring twenties shift changes between world wars, god forbid not to be repeated, but socio-political tensions are growing everywhere only in recent days the largest xx century strike in germany, millions of protesters against pension reform in france to israel, an original attempt to shift the balance of the judiciary caused the sharpest polarization of society from israel

, vgtrk correspondent sergey pashkov last monday , when hundreds of thousands of people took to the streets, when transport stopped and the airport closed, when they worked, banks and shopping centers or naht view of the seaside israeli city, ashdod went with everyone to the central square with us, waiting for they have already begun, that is, at first it was in the center and well, you can’t get there. i don't know how people get. i'm even afraid to think about it , something out there for low hundreds of thousands of people or several hundred thousand cars in some kind of radius. i can’t even imagine how you can get there, when they are waiting for you somewhere, it has already begun to be carried out with us, that is, i went there shlomolensky already lives a quarter in the west bank, jordan, his village is located on the territory in which the international community considers palestinian . he also went to the rally weekly.

but it was a rally when supporters of netanyahu and his reforms gathered near the building in jerusalem, but they already gathered, they already proved they already held several large major demonstrations of several hundred thousand people about this, though the media is not only silent, but greatly underestimate the numbers while the left overestimate, but certainly if desired, uh , enough forces to flood all the streets in all cities civil conflict, threatening to turn into hand-to-hand stopped netanyahu at the last minute. announced a pause in lawmaking and invited a position to find a compromise, at the negotiating table the streets were empty for the time being, but claims and distrust of each other remained with us a very cunning politician. one very experienced unequivocally he does. in my opinion, a lot. he did many things useful to israel and everything and everything. it's a very big leader in the world and so forth, but

today he went off the rails, in my understanding , went off the rails, because the personal problems that he has. there's some kind of coalition litigation problem, because he again, he wants to be an example. he is an example, firstly, so that this does not affect his court case, secondly, he wants power , like any opposition politician, they are sure that benjamin netanyagus, who today combines the post of prime minister with the status of being on trial, accused of corruption, has started a legal reform for himself to make judges including the judges of israel's supreme court of justice of wealth more obedient and accommodating supporters of the same incumbent government. such as breaking lensky reproach him for insufficient rigidity and principles while accusing the judges of the supreme court of betraying the basic interests of the people, israel's huturalists have already

been convicted. in prison, they turned out to be right, they must be granted and they must be pitied, one must enter into their position. it turns out you can negotiate with a tourist organization. if it is for the good, but it is for the good from the point of view of whom not from the point of view of parliament and government, which did not gather at all, but from the point of view of some group. there professors of doctors of sciences of the elite, and the city dweller elennacht i the settler walked, volensky, united in only one thing, they do not consider the legal system of israel to be sinless, but the supreme court of justice, fully, corresponding to its name, further differences begin, differences in the interpretation of this and justice by supporters who consider themselves reform needs 100% judges who have of us are definitely not doing that let's say the job that we lived most of. the population of israel would be expected, because

sometimes somewhere they make decisions that are not comparable with our parliament and desire people somewhere. there is such a thing. there is. you don’t know that now you need to completely break everything. yes, let's fix it. let's rush, strike and demonstrate together. behind behind the closed doors of the presidential office in jerusalem, representatives of the government and the opposition are trying to agree on a compromise, trying to combine the incompatible and reconcile those who hated each other yesterday, justice is a strong feeling, it can divide the country into friends and foes, and then, people who called themselves brothers i can be enemies. and this means that in the hands of the negotiators today, the fate and future of all of israel sergey pashkov alexander ivanyuk anastasia demyanets from israel especially for international review. the prehistory is different everywhere, but the reason is the general feeling of the fragility

of the future and the lack of justice in germany 100 years ago, it was the latter, due to the defeat in the war of predatory peace conditions and the incapacity of the government, that gave rise to the demand for the simplicity of radicalism. and now the feeling of injustice is spreading around the planet in different countries of the community age and social groups. gathering of two subjects kristo komarnicki from bulgaria on the left, a macron-like man yells, go, get yourself a job, and the frenchman answers. it's better for you to resign the artist and it's from france who inspires emmanuel macron, the gravestone says 1925 - 2018, although thatcher died for 5 years. previously, here, apparently, the year of the beginning

of the protest in france, the provocative german karika tourist oraner hacklin, on the topic of strikes in france germany, a person who looks like a macron, only says a small reform, and a child in a stroller at the chancellor of sweden answers him. we, too, are on strike in the crap protests against judicial reform and the split in israeli society . the work is briefly titled israeli among themselves. patrick champade on the subject of a crowning visit to macron due to strikes, as the sign says british king charles iii went to germany and not to france drawing and is entitled cancellation of the visit. justice is an infrequent companion of history, but the uneven distribution of benefits, even economically, even politically, even culturally, is tolerated easier. if there are expectations tomorrow will be better

than yesterday, the past post -world war ii era and until the recent dawn of liberal globalization is a period of comfort and optimism for a large part of the world's population. but it has now ended with a circle of fears, even innovators who promised that technological progress will solve all problems beat thousands of not the last people in this area, led by elon musk and steve wozniak. they just called to freeze the training of artificial intelligence, too dangerous for russia, lord human rights humanity even late, means some. the tectonic shift that the world is experiencing is multifaceted. we will return to various aspects of this topic more than once until we confine ourselves to one statement. the creation of a just world is an extremely complex process, because

everyone has their own interpretation of justice. before we live. yes and the harmonization of kalizi, for every taste, is pretty much to come. justice in the sense of justice should be universal, such a view prevailed at the end of the 20th century, the systemic split of the cold war ended with a bloody civil strife in europe and africa demanded a response. moreover, life seems to have proved that there is only one correct moral and ethical system and it is based on liberal principles. the international criminal court began work in 2002 after the entry into force of the rome statute, it formalized the creation of a new judicial body and authorized it to investigate the case of genocide, violation of the rules of war or the neva convention, but the mousse is not directly related to it should not be confused with the international court. which is also located in the hague and is one of

main organs. un in forty-five. it was created to resolve international disputes or situations that could lead to conflict. it is important that the jurisdiction of the mousse extends exclusively to the states that have signed and ratified the rome status . more than 40 refused to do this, among them the turkeys, the chinese of the united states and russia, and the front two signed the rome statute, but washington withdrew the signature, and russia did not ratify contract. at the same time, the united states acts as a consistent critism. he even allows the special services to carry out forceful operations to free us citizens detained on the basis of his warrant. and while donald trump was president, he imposed sanctions against his employees, mousse, does not have its own police or

any coercive apparatus in general, in theory , the state should themselves transfer wanted people , but there are internal rules of law that allow you not to do this. at the same time , the mousse does not consider cases in absentia, but only after the arrest of the accused is financed about the same as it is. each participating country makes its contribution depending on the population and its income, by the way, in the top ten largest donors for 2020, there are six participants in the so-called big family. yorki and also austria, spain and south korea, but there are also voluntary contributions or donations, it is impossible to establish who made it, the state or an individual, in 20 years. mousse, who received more than 1 billion euros, registered claims from 139 countries, and opened an investigation in only eight cases. however, some

of them ended in justification. international the criminal court loudly reminded of itself by issuing an arrest warrant for the president of russia and the russian commissioner for children's rights, the prosecutor considers the evacuation of children from the war zone a mass abduction, that is , from now on , countries that recognize the jurisdiction of the court are supposed to arrest the defendants if they find themselves on their territories and transfer to gaga when it comes to such incidents, of course, there can be no talk of any justice outside of politics, but if, in principle, a chance for a more or less impartial judicial proceedings in common supranational jurisdiction one world. it is only available in two versions. at least. uh, so far we are offered two variations. this is either some kind of global, which will exercise jurisdiction over the entire globe. and then any international courts.

actually, these are simply hegemonic courts and no, nothing, but new. for us, these are just analogues of intranational courts. uh, since a world united under a hegemon is just an analogue of a sovereign state, extended to the entire global globe the second variant of such an order is, for example , if there is, relatively speaking, a certain extended situation with the un general assembly where there will be no world hegemon, and the world hegemot will be represented, as it were, by some kind of world parliament. uh, this is the second uh, the second option that was offered there in the middle of the 2000s in the mid-10s. this is considered such a european version of global international law, and not under the leadership of any particular state. e. well, then, in fact, the situation doesn't change at all. simply conditionally, this is not some specific state. they are, well, a certain number of subjects. not only,

by the way, it was proposed to turn off the states there. and representatives of various kinds, namely the nationality of the nations, not necessarily, which are framed, as the state sounds, like utopia both, all the more so since the hegemon himself, now rather, who was in relation to justice from the outside, takes a tough position, even a special law was adopted on the protection of us citizens from the attacks of criticism of the international court back in the late nineties in the early 2000s, they said that we have the us constitution , which in article 3 provides that the judicial power is exercised by the supreme court and the lower courts being created interpret the provision in the literal sense that us citizens cannot be subject to any other court, except as a matter of fact, created on the basis of the constitution , why is this so? this question is not exclusively a kind of casuistic interpretation of the idea

is that the constitution - it's not just some. random document a normative legal act that the constitution is a form of expression of the social contract, that the constitution continues the idea of ​​the war for independence, e.g., the declaration of independence of 1776, which, first of all , establishes the right of every people, but above all, the people of the former colonies, to self-determination and to formalize for themselves the political power system that they want in other words, all power belongs to the people and in this case the american people and all authorities, including the judiciary, must. finally carry responsibility directly to the american people is a situation where an american citizen is judged, for example, by some national body. well, the same university, a situation arises in which the decision is made by people who do not and cannot bear any responsibility to the american people. they have nothing to do with american statehood to

the american republic and therefore uh adversary. it directly points out to him that he denies not only the legal system of the united states there , he denies the right to self-government in general, that is, he denies the entire constitutional history of the united states of america well, of course, there are claims to the purely legal side, because the same constitution provides for everyone to consider the right of everyone, and it is a trial with the participation of, for example, a jury, which, of course, is absent in the arctic . well, it’s just that such a procedure is not provided for. to examine the criticism of the court indicates that it provides citizens of the united states of america with a lesser degree of guarantee, and in terms of rights and freedoms, than the national legal system and therefore in no way. he e cannot be applied to them. in addition, critics have pointed out the following curious moment. uh,

the court procedure in particular on the jurisdiction of the so -called withdrawal, that is, by default, of course, as a general rule. e, the court applies its rules to citizens of countries that have signed and ratified the relevant treaty. however, at the same time. it provides for the possibility, on a case-by-case basis, of a non- party to a treaty, but to accept jurisdiction over a particular case in its own right. territory. the position, it must be said, sounds convincing, but the americans defend this approach exclusively for themselves. the fact is that the americans here are not defending the idea of ​​sovereignty, as such, they are defending the idea , first of all, of their own exclusivity, that the united states of america is not just one of the countries, not just one of a nation- state is a nation-state. based on certain principles. well , including there, for example, democracy, but the fact is that, for example, a prosecutor or a judge

representatives of the assembly of the countries of the parties to this agreement are elected, among which, for example, there is the central african republic of afghanistan and so on, and it turns out that a decision is finally made. uh, issued by this court will be accepted on the basis of the will of countries that, from the point of view of the united states of america , have nothing to do with democratic values, and therefore the united states believes that they are protecting universal values. they are not against the meaningful activity of the brain, then they are not opposed to the values ​​that in turn protect immunization. they simply assume that the structure of this organization is procedural issues related to the formation. uh, there with the composition of the judges and so on. they simply do not protect those universal values ​​that they protect themselves, the united states of america, therefore, the united states of america believes that they themselves will be

able to protect these values ​​much better than through, for example, these national structures were ardent supporters this permanent court. well, after the temporary tribunals. they pointed to one proviso that they consider it necessary to initiate any proceedings. uh, in this court , only the sans of the un security council, that is , the body where the us has the ability to, well, just veto any decision. and therefore. this way they can limit it. uh, the likelihood that not democratic countries, for example, but can influence the adoption of appropriate decisions regarding the citizens of the united states of america is a situation where, in fact, without us consent may be initiated. uh, the next thing the united states is no longer ready to participate in this whole event, that is, in fact, this is not the protection of sovereignty, as such, it is the protection of the interests and sovereignty of the united states of america, which

considers itself. naturally , they believe that they are an exemplary state and that they are the very city on the hill, which should serve as an example for everyone else, but let's give the right to non-democratic countries. to judge citizens, and this exemplary state. well they just think incorrectly. the first international tribunal was the nuremberg trials, representatives of the four powers of the allies of the ussr usa france and great britain worked on the dock, the highest state military figures of the third reich were found guilty, almost all were found guilty , it was not by chance that the nazis congress was held in nuremberg for the first time. racial laws were also adopted here, by analogy, the tokyo international military tribunal was held on japanese war criminals. in may, 93 established

international tribunal for the former yugoslavia 2/3 of the defendants were serbs, and the croats were abusive. mostly they escaped persecution, the most high-ranking accused ex-president yugoslaviisevic and his companions did not live up to the verdict, but radovan karadzic, iratka, vladic. sentenced to life imprisonment. this is the first tribunal that the organizers said was held on behalf of the entire international community. in the ninety- fifth year, the perrondi tribunal was created, it investigated the causes of the genocide, which was organized by the hutu people against the people turkey, according to some reports, a murder in the country was committed every 10 seconds, 2/3 of the verdicts turned out to be guilty in the early 2000s on the initiative. he was established. another international tribunal to investigate the crimes of the red worlds in

cambodia for 4 years. they are known to have been destroyed by citizens according to various estimates, then from one and a half to three million people died. in 2008 , for the first time, an international criminal court issued an arrest warrant for a sitting president; sudanese leader omar al-bashir was charged with genocide and ethnic purges in the province. dar after the coup in 2019, he was overthrown and arrested a year later, the new authorities agreed to extradite him to the international criminal court, but so far this has not happened. mousse is a phenomenon of a unique time, when it seemed that justice without national reference was about to become a reality. and when it turned out that a single universe, while the previous obligations were being postponed , they became somewhat interesting

. the russian leader is formally recognized in south africa as the jurisdiction of the mousse, in fact , they even tried to get out of it, but domestic political turbulence does not allow, however, when sudanese president omar al-bashir arrived in south africa for the african summit 8 years ago. no one , of course, betrayed him anywhere, there is truth and the pioneers-hero of the constitutional court of armenia precisely. now what is appropriate to decide that the ratification of participation in the mousse is in accordance with the legislation of the country. there, of course, in their heads is not belokamennaya at all, but the capital of another neighboring state. but still in a timely manner next nowhere going for broke in an international criminal court, in fact , risks if countries en masse begin to ignore the verdict of the structure and end there. and the international criminal court. yes, this can be a sentence for him in the part

that, well, his authority can hit. although i must say that he has never been great, especially not. uh, if you look, uh, his sentences are all over. that's how many twenty-plus-kopeck years of its existence, then there, uh, really considered did, in my opinion, a little more than a third of what he was going to consider most acquittals. and as far as i remember, those that are not exculpatory are there. eh, well, in general, nothing has been done. well, for example, it was here's the production, like otdafi, but then they didn't have time, okay, here, but in general there's just uh, you look and didn't show up for the proceedings , it's not worth burying international legal institutions. just don't have high expectations. international courts are an indicator of the degree of community integration. if e the community does not have

a consensus on how they should be understood. uh, for example, some fundamental concepts, whether it's human rights. e, in terms of the limits of their content or e. hmm, what concepts like war and peace, for example, cannot be said, probably that international justice will disappear altogether. yes, because the world is not divided into completely separate national entities. yes , it is split up, rather, as if into some blocks, and if it is just some block system and integration associations, then there should be courts inside these integration associations, of course, which will resolve disputes between the participants of these integration associations, with regard to the relations between these blocs, it also cannot be said that somehow justice will completely disappear, it seems to me that e, these situational tribunals

that were created, uh hmm the dominance of national sovereign states. uh, within the framework of resolving a dispute between them, yes, but they will be quite applicable in this case. the chairman of the board of trustees made his professional contribution to the dispute in jurisdictions russian bar association dmitry anatolyevich medvedev, he gave the following legal argument, it is quite possible to imagine the targeted use of hypersonic onyx from the north sea from a russian ship on the building of the hague court , we will continue the topic of law enforcement of this kind after advertising. for headaches, there is askofen-p at an affordable price and askofen ultra with a reinforced composition

to combat headaches and migraines askofen when your head hurts. open a business account in uralsibir and get six months of free service at a favorable rate perspective hamburger, only 35 rubles. pentalgin extragel contains a special component for better penetration against more inflammation in muscles and joints on the eve of easter let's share