[000:00:00;00] pintra with a reinforced composition to combat headaches and migraines askofen when your head hurts

for better penetration i am cartoon dads, we have a tournament. and we have a live broadcast. but it’s okay that all this home internet and tv of yours is in my tariff. i can talk calmly, of course you can on the balcony watch and control beeline tv in the tariff up and profitable, add home internet on your side to buy 11 types of currencies without commission. and it's not just advertising. it's a fact , download the vks app and invest with the

market leader. in burger king in the application thanks to the combined composition it happens that tomatoes it is difficult to even call tomatoes in tomatoes eco-culture

no accident. does the taste have eco-culture eat delicious tomatoes? less cough moscow and minsk agreed to place russian-nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus domestic ammunition was located only in the home field of the americans, who continued to store charges in europe, russian diplomacy

criticized the situation, calling for the missiles to be taken home. however, it changed dramatically, but alexander lukashenko still in the ninety-fourth year, only as the head of the state, he tried to achieve the cancellation of the decision on withdrawal. so i waited for the president to be a long time. let's talk about how the nuclear balance of power has changed with our good friend konstantin bogdanov from mmo kostya hello. let's go right away let's dispel with one some kind of misunderstanding that is now hovering, especially in minsk russia is actively developing it, because nuclear weapons do not transfer everything under our control to anyone. it remains that russia did not transfer does not transfer nuclear weapons - this is a question of finding nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, and again . it is not yet a fact that in the future it will be possible to do after the appropriate storage is in place, because nuclear weapons cannot be obtained under the bush. it requires quite hard and live technical support, including for

everyday, like the first of july, they promise that it was officially announced that such a repository would be created. that is, after that, technically , nuclear weapons can be deployed on the territory of belarus, and somehow some argue that there is no violation of any provisions of the day. well, interpretations, especially violation. during the day everything is very funny, because in fact, if we approach this issue with everything in everyday life, then naturally there is no violation, because this absolutely symmetrical practice of the cold war, when both sides e declared. well, i don't know what they said they planned, uh, to transfer nuclear weapons to their ally for joint use. in peacetime, this weapon, including if it was on the territory of the allies, it was in storage facilities at military bases belonging to the main, so to speak, hegemon, that is, either the states or the soviet union, and under its control and only in the military time was supposed to be transmitted here, so to speak

, the question arises legal so to speak, so say tourism, or what? yes, in this legal purity interpretation. here is the wording of the contract. they proliferation of nuclear weapons does not say under what conditions it is forbidden to transfer for exploitation. but from a practical point of view, everyone is well aware that at a time when superpowers called by names have a nuclear war in their hands , few people will care about compliance with one of the articles of the day, therefore, and in peacetime, naturally, the personnel of the relevant armed forces did not receive. uh, access to those nuclear weapons had nothing to do with him. all. it was in warehouses and storage facilities that belonged to the armed forces. strictly speaking, the powers of patrons. but staff training about something or what was also discussed just now, well, staff training is another slippery interpretation, that is, on the one hand, as it were, yes. uh, it seems like people are being trained to use these weapons on occasion from the other side. again

, a direct violation can be seen here. well, you can go upstairs, but again, on a thin and by and large, the soviet union was silent on this topic until the ninety-first year, until they brought out all of russia, as a rule. successor to all nuclear weapons within national territory. after us , a good leverage appeared on the americans, who did not remove nuclear weapons from europe. well, they left some kind of quantity, because there were seven thousand one warheads for five, and some 150 were left there . ah, well, it was more convenient to deal with pressure, because we have all nuclear weapons within the national territory. so you can, if necessary, this button to put on the table or, so to speak, on this very chair to the opponent, having talked with him about such other things now, uh, the position has leveled off, we are approximately on an equal footing. and which, by the way, is emphasized by the president's statement that we are doing the same thing, they do not consider what should be done. it's a violation of the day. well, we don't consider it a violation of the day either, er. well, here's the cold war, which you mention it was the dawn of this whole business, you can say,

and first of all, the first question i have is a meaning what was 7.000 e charges in europe. it had some kind of military significance. after the second world war , the air force became the sole owner of nuclear weapons in the united states, at the same time they turned into a separate branch of the military. prior to this, aviation was part of the army and navy, nuclear strikes were supposed to be carried out by bombers, but the bombs themselves were expensive and in limited quantities, so it was believed that one was enough for targets such as the city. although this is not always the case, the korean war showed that not all planes fly up to to the goal, and return in general units in europe the soviet union had an advantage in conventional weapons as technology for the production and delivery of nuclear weapons advanced in the west, there was talk of their asymmetric use in the event

of a large-scale conflict in europe as a result of the nato strategic concept in 1954. shield and sword , nuclear weapons are deployed in member countries, and on the way of the offensive of the soviet troops, this is germany, the netherlands, belgium, greece, italy and turkey, in the end , provoked the deployment of medium-range missiles around the world the caribbean crisis, but did not lead to its final withdrawal from europe, on the contrary , the military personnel of the nato countries began to be involved in training in delivering nuclear strikes. this was called the division of nuclear responsibility or nocle sharing by the seventies , the number of warheads reached about 7,000 pieces in response to the appearance of the soviet complex. pioneer washington undertook to deploy two missiles on foot in europe. this is a maghawk, but in the eighties, when detente began and an agreement was signed on the elimination

of medium-small missiles, the range of there will be charges began to decrease in two thousandths and there were already about 500 of them stopped. less and less. now the us does not officially confirm, but deny the presence of nuclear weapons in europe officially. it is known that trider missiles are on british nuclear submarines. however, in 2019, nato accidentally shared a document that later disappeared from public access. a canadian senator in his report openly named the number of nuclear charges, according to these data, there are about 150 of them in europe and are stored they are still in belgium germany, the netherlands, italy and turkey, well, uh , if we talk specifically about the feasibility of the strategy, one can argue here, but how would the americans hold back the strategic plan in this way, but how they imagined it.

a conflict with the soviet union could develop, that is, a major offensive of the warsaw pact by conventional armed forces, in which the warsaw of the fifties surpassed nato and deployed tactical nuclear weapons in terms of personnel and technology. at first, they proceeded from the fact that, in principle, modern warfare is atomic, so the means of reinforcement make it possible to defend without deploying huge masses of people. then the idea arose that in fact, probably, the atomic war was on the battlefield. somehow not very well managed. and in principle, it’s not very correct to conduct it in this way, ours came to this conclusion, also by the end of the sixties, approximately, but in the containment option, these 7,000 warheads were already beginning to play a big role, that is, uh, the thought was such that the russians would think and attack western europe and if we won't have anything there to hold them back? and how are they going to think of 7.200 baizards, but i won’t attack 7.000. this is, well, some kind of absurdity, so to speak, enough. it's a few, actually. well , how enough at that time the parties had

several tens of thousands. and so to speak , application plans were drawn very generously. there are hundreds in the first waves, therefore, well, as they say, an entrance is not needed, as in that joke. so uh it looked like. so at that moment even this sharing, that is, i the actual nuclear mission was justified to a certain extent, because there were many allies and there were a lot of these weapons and it is possible and even, probably, from the point of view of that war strategy. it was necessary to apply jointly, therefore, there was, uh, sharing with strange projects within the nato countries there were corresponding projects within your contract expense, but with such a huge number of charges. uh, how, in general, was the management carried out, say , by the americans, how they built relations with allies or allies, in fact, no matter how it was, well, as i said. it was none of their business, they did not interfere in the management of the us nuclear arsenal , which was also located in the territory, that is, the storage facility was located in the territory of countries, as they are now located at these

six air bases in five countries, for example. and uh , they just had nothing to do with it. they had prepared a personal composition, which, on occasion in e. if it were not necessary, these ammunition would be handed over in finished form to wear further in accordance with the protocols. as they were already taught , they will use them on combat missions was controlled by the americans and with rice , the nuclear technical support of the storage facility was completely american on the territory of the territorial american military bases ; in 1961, the united states deployed 15 jupiter medium-range missiles in turkey, their flight time to moscow was only 10 minutes in response to this in may 1962, nikita

khrushchev agreed, fidel castro decided deploy soviet medium-range missiles with nuclear warheads in cuba from july to october, civilian ships of the ussr navy transported 40 launchers to the island , but on october 14 an american reconnaissance aircraft discovered and photographed their pecrisis, on october 27 an american u2 reconnaissance aircraft was shot down over cuba john f. kennedy announced the decision two days later , to start bombing soviet missile bases on the island, the world was on the brink of nuclear war, a compromise was found on the night of october 27-28 during a meeting of the minister of justice robert find by the soviet ambassador dobrynin from november 5 to 9, soviet missiles were removed from cuba and washington removed missiles from turkey some time later in the seventies, high-precision missile guidance systems appeared on the target, and then there was talk. that with one precise nuclear strike

it is possible to destroy the enemy's leadership before he decides to retaliate secretary of defense james schlesinger unveiled the concept of a decapitation strike as the basis of a nuclear us policy and the following year, the tava declaration was signed between great britain and france, which at that moment was no longer part of nato but now abandoned the independent defense policy and planned to closely cooperate with the alliance in the nuclear field in response to new threats in the fifty-seventh year the soviet union installed pioneer nuclear tactical missiles on the territory of the gdr and czechoslovakia in response to this, the nato council decided that if moscow did not reverse its decision to launch american missiles, pershing two and tomahawk would appear in

europe by the year 83 over the next two years, the united states managed to deploy almost a thousand missiles, their flight time was a maximum of 10 minutes , the event of 83 years went down in history as a crisis and euroket, but in 84 yuri died from drops, and then konstantin chernenko gorbachev became the new leader which in 87 david signed an agreement on the elimination of a whole class of medium-range missiles . the soviet union destroyed not only the installations of the pioneers, but also the complex, aka the united states, for its part, abandoned the complex and ground tomahawk missiles the ussr abandoned nuclear weapons in eastern europe. here are the allies, both american in the west and soviet in the warsaw pact, they were not at all embarrassed by the fact that they did not control, but in which case it was they who were fighting the nuclear field. well, these are two

questions: what they are, what they do not control did not bother them, because they still lacked this headache, because nuclear technical support. this is a very complicated procedure. i just need to lie. and secondly, as if, if we talk about the fact that they become a nuclear battlefield, well, it was embarrassing, yes, and a well-known case when a team of regular games of the 70s. uh, the german military-political leadership. just slamming doors. let's say here you are playing the nuclear destruction of west germany why your own american nuclear bombs will start to run out of reasons, well, yes, the russians, tuesday is here, something must be done about it. in principle, they were embarrassed by this even if you look at some documents of the same warsaw pact, for example, hungarian or polish, which were declassified after the ninety- first year. it's heavy enough reflection on the topic of what to do with the country that will become. uh, the very first target of retaliatory nuclear strikes. so to speak, this is up to the export of the population already completely to the east, and so on the remnants of the population. well, this was the epoch. well, everything

happened then, for obvious reasons, in europe now. eh, you can probably already state that this is the idea that we keep our national territory, it is no longer relevant. and where else can some charges appear? here are the americans in asia who are officially declared the chief, tvd so to speak for the future, where they can place something. well, here's a subtle question. will they post it? because, so to speak, a discussion on this topic. there, there is practically no other question that if the question arises of pressure from the main allies that are threshold, primarily from south korea, then they can go for an exchange. we grant you no excess in response to the fact that you abandon your nuclear program, such an option is technically possible, especially. if the americans have too there are many, so to speak, some other pots in the kitchen, which must be simultaneously worked in europe and asia, south asia, and so on. uh, american tactical nuclear weapons were in south

korea during the cold war, and how would it be possible to return them there if the question of china's containment is already at this level, but so far it's a little far from that, but from my point of view, the main main uh, the logic by which it can appear there is the exclusion of the development of nuclear programs of the threshold state. that is it south korea is a theoretical japan because both of them literally in six months can assemble not only a working device, but japan with their plutonium reserves can mass- produce. well, china is traditionally known much less than china does not like to dedicate its strategic issues to anyone, but still, if you fantasize, you can imagine that china will also think about placing something somewhere, i can’t imagine. such a scenario, firstly, china does not have a lot of nuclear weapons, apparently, there will be more in the near future, but not so much, secondly, and this is more important , china does not have military co. as such, it has specific relations with some

states, they have our strategic partnership with russia, which is not a military alliance underlining not too long ago, quite publicly, he has a special relationship with pakistan, which is also not a military alliance per se, but he has no allies in the version of american extended deterrence. that is, or both also does not fit. no, it doesn't fit, there, again same special relationship, but also what could e chinese nuclear weapons do in north korea. there already are nuclear weapons, that is, if again hypothetically thinking about replacing one with another, but how is that politically? i don't know, that is. well, there is absolutely no need for things here and the chinese are very cautious about this kind of things, because the name that is in the international arena is still vitally important to them. they understand what they will look like if they go up a notch in this discussion and move away from specific, which means placements. does it change now in this turbulent environment, the perception of nuclear weapons is somewhere in us or in america in china. i mean, to what extent we

start to think that this is, in general, just another weapon, well, about just another weapon. i would say that this is still a long way off, because all the things that have been said there over the past year on this topic, for example, they came down to nuclear risks. that is, to the fact that the risks of using nuclear weapons. it has grown in sight and on and western rhetoric. it is actually visible and in russian rhetoric. although in a number of cases, it is deployed, so to speak, a little turned inside out. this is, in principle, also a perception of high risk. there we are talking about the fact that if something happens, it will fly in, but it’s still impossible to perceive, uh, nuclear weapons as another weapon, because if you look at the calculations on those studies that were born during the cold war, and those studies, which were made for the indo-pakistani theater, for example, at one time, where the number of nuclear weapons is comparable to the european one now. that paradoxical conclusion. e nuclear weapons, as a means of the battlefield, really begin

to mean something only with massive use. well, actually, the seventies. we remember that all these here are 80-100 strikes in the zone of one advancing army. further. sort it out for yourself well, our greatest military theorists, they are the late gaev a said that at the beginning of 70 he considered this hmm and came to the conclusion. what this war is simply uncontrollable. there, for almost three days, after the first wave of the war of nuclear strikes, there were waves of nuclear strikes. i'll just have to figure it out who where is who what is the offensive doing? the americans came directly to the same conclusion and , by and large, considered all these means as a means of deterrence, if we move to the level of insignificant use, that is, there are a few dozen, then military significance, all the more no. and in particular, this, uh, they considered at one time for the scheme for the use of pakistani tactical nuclear weapons against indian mechanized troops does not work, that is,

there is a clear stopping effect cardinal - it does not only give a deterrent effect when we apply it on the field. combat tactical nuclear weapons. this is the penultimate, maybe the last step before the warning that strategic exchanges will go on, including in cities. this is precisely the element of deterrence. and in the current version , it only looks like this, because, well, what are 100 american nuclear bombs in these e, it means that six storage facilities on the territory of nato countries are actually a storage facility, there are up to 18 more of them. they're just empty yet. and it is military it does not matter, as such, that is, it can be used, well, it is very effective enough, but just as an element of deterrence in the theater, the same applies to ours. thank you, konstantin bogdanov was with us china brazil signed an agreement on the transition to trading in national currencies. the united states tripled the supply of oil to the european union on the sale

of russian oil to india increased 22 times scattered facts. this week the built-in jigsaw puzzle is being put together, the world is rapidly reshaping in the direction of a new system partition and politically discarding the desire for universal approaches and economically slashing. even those markets that remained more or less unified during the cold war are what we are seeing. this is a very fast restoration of the division of the world to the east. and in the west they are almost completely refocusing on asia's customers. the time when europe begins to receive raw materials from any other sources. nothing like this, we have not seen before both the large-scale and the furcation of the market that determines the trend. if we look back a hundred years ago, the parallel does not the most radiant, then the structuring of associations also took place, which quickly went from ideological economic to

military-political and turned out to be ready for a fight, which thereby became inevitable . history never repeats itself literally, but it never passes without a trace. it was

an international review. goodbye. we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. watch the video stopped working install open watch russian channels and all series movies and cartoons educational programs and documentaries

movies. metropolitan pavel was sent under house arrest in the house of the governor of the kiev-pechersk lavra searched he was charged with inciting hatred and cooperation with russia the chairmanship of the un security council for this month passes to russia what topics does moscow

plan to raise and discuss in an international organization? up to +17 predicts this weekend in the urals, flooding is expected in 9 municipalities. how is it prepared and in what other regions the situation remains difficult for the russian biathlon championship in khanty-mansiysk, today the women's relay and the male bridge is sitting behind the course of the competition . our correspondent. we are waiting for his direct inclusion. precision-guided munitions to provide russian troops has grown many times, this was stated by sergei shoigu at the headquarters of the joint group of russian forces, the heads of defense held a meeting on the issue of providing troops with ammunition. shoigu also heard reports on