[000:00:00;00] we watch graphs and documentaries for free without registration in the application or on the website if

we talk, of course, about what is happening now in the united states, this is, of course, everyone is waiting, the day after tomorrow april 4 will come will not come recognizes does not recognize, most likely will come to this court in district. well, here's what a democrat will do. it’s interesting here, because, on the one hand, you can say that, well, he didn’t recognize him and left, he paid bail and left, but on the other hand, you can combine the republicans into handcuffs of the miranda rule step in as your leader. here are the citizens of america, fight for trump. democrats. work for freedom, don't let the republicans rock the boat, then everything is right. yes, yes, a place in rostov must be earned like the blue states offend you red red states angela's freedom, davis is already free, no now donald trump's freedom donald trump's freedom, and tomorrow all the newspapers will talk. here

you see the russian swaying donald disappointed me a little. he disappointed on january 6th with photos of this girl of the first year. well, there are no tastes, but on the other hand, at least not taking into account current tastes. it's good that the girls there want to say so, all the students looked, they also talked about why suffer because of what because of what? as a matter of fact, a man will go to hell in new york, but in itself. here is a political order for trump. he is interesting, because the american legislation does not allow the democrats to block him as a republican candidate, even if they put him in prison, that is, he can get out of jail govern america can most likely, well, the prison carries enough. a rich man. he moved to the white house in a living robe and in shackles . that's also interesting. this has never happened before

. donald trump, in principle, in the history of the united states, only grants were caught drunk on the streets in washington, where they were presented to him. he paid a fine of 20 dollars at that time, huge huge was a fine , so trump i think he will pay off here, of course, but the fact that this will add to his popularity is absolutely perfect, because he is now becoming persecuted by the government, which violates everything and everything, which goes against the princes of americanism, that is, the principles on which it was founded, the united states faith there god, uh, property protection of privacy interests of everything else these principles, they are violated and donald trump well, it becomes like this same deep in the topic. he gave a very accurate comment, so it's good, yes cut.

i can show journalists. are you talking about transgenderism mr. president any reaction to the accusation against trump? no you don't worry what it is the accusation will further divide our country. i have no comments on this. you don't have to worry about possible protests in light of the allegations. no, i'm not going to talk about accusations against trump mr. president. do you think the charges against trump are politically motivated? i have no comments on trump. deep in the subject of man knows everything. this is not about transgender people. it's about politics. well biden situation with trump. she, of course, is for himself, in my opinion, she is not like because biden, until he announced that he will be president looking for a replacement. i mean, the presidential candidate on the demo of the americans will say not only that they didn’t steal the election and illegally brought biden to the white

house, depriving trump of his victory. now they are trying to crack down on him and throw the man who saved america, who made america great again, behind the walls. just write the most texts to him. necessary. it is interesting that more than 30 charges that have not yet been brought against him will linger in these thirty charges, and the enterprise is the first thing that solovyov praises him in russian television. all. well, volodya, there was only one president who put himself in the public eye , so to speak, when it was december 19 , 1919. zelensky or what? yes, and he did not give peace, right? well, he’s just directly jealous of mine. i understand, but he’s very serious about you, that’s all. everyone then wondered how much you paid him, so to speak, for advertising, so he’s inexpensive. well, i also thought that he was not very expensive, so we are vulgarity and if

trump is a follower, but unfortunately, he does not consistently happen, not always. by at least with this stephanie clifford or stor daniels, he once. he said there was nothing at all. the eighteenth year admitted that there was something. why did you buy it back then? in short, for rights , no one knew that nothing trump needed was able to. this was not consistent, since with this step he also bypasses almost all potential candidates within the republican party, that is, the genus desantis. in my opinion, a person who fits, fits the role over the role republican candidate. he has already stated that trump will not give florida away. well , he himself, in principle, the seventy-eighth year of birth man. he can still 4 years, then 5 years calmly wait until the future president, but at least more

useful face to take, of course, yes , maybe very possible and kevin on the map then, when the congress went on vacation for the weekly, well, they left for the districts. uh, deputy deputies of congress, yes , he went on vacation. and now, of course, even kevin on the map, says we'll start an investigation , we'll start an investigation. against the prosecutor against the prosecutor's office that brought this accusation. uh, supposedly, how politically motivated, that is, the political struggle in the united states will be transferred and to the platform of congress. at least the house of representatives, so trump by all accounts. this is where it wins in my opinion. and if they still think about it and decide all the same, so to speak , humiliate them there, take a picture of the front in profile or still in handcuffs, and to the american courts brought in handcuffs.

uh, handcuffed, it seems that trump in the twenty-fourth year is almost guaranteed to win, unless, of course, there is some such a serious failure, for example, the collapse of the united states before that, because the blue states are good, blue is red. blue red lights up. i have been counting on this for a very long time, but i still understand that the americans have enough of the united states. well, with the regime a strong state, as long as it is up to two poseidons. so keep thinking so here's red and blue states somehow collide on this physically reasoned in mind in this situation becomes a symbol. he is not just, well, a man, he becomes a symbol, a symbol of a split, well, a symbol of that america, and for americans, 750 dollars. it is a lot or a little, in general it is a lot. well, with each american taxpayer gave ukraine 750

dollars. i think not even anymore. no, that 's what they say, well, now americans think it's just interesting. and this topic is widely discussed in america, that is, they asked american payers. guys but 750 dollars from your pocket. this little cocaine poroshenko zelensky asked that the biden families, in particular , be fine with the son of the biden khantra. but usually such things are discussed on the sites, or it is in the media or it is discussed at university conferences, and both are now dollars. uh, they paid from the tax, but the democrats are really now talking about the fact that this is what they write to me right now, ukraine will go on the offensive. there she will break everyone , she will break through, in general, she will enter, either in the crimea will come in. tomorrow they will announce, well, a package of aid of 2.6 tens of billions and another five they. announce anything you want, but the beggars of san francisco will come to blinkin and say,

you hear the man, and 750 dollars from our pocket. how serious is this? yes, this is serious. you can tell whatever you want there to chat 750. here you are personally, damn it, take victoria nuland. take soros. take all those that are weapons. here you have your money in this project of yours. take money from hunter biden, whom he received in ukraine . here you go, track 750 dollars of each tax payer. for what they go for nothing. in general, almost here are the republicans. in particular, we have a new one on the map, and he is trying to promote it, the only thing is that since these platforms where this issue could be held are in the hands of the democrats, they ask questions differently there, so now these more billions will go and there will be more. that is, they will not calm down until they reach 1,000. yes i think they will not calm down until the present. the administration will be in power

they can say, and you are generally exactly whose they are this american comedian, who is joyfully there. and here is where our president says, he runs around ukraine he says who else has american money, who else has american money? but if the americans really think that e. donald trump can ensure their interests, and to him the same image, what has already been created in a certain way that it will be good, then, yes, then it’s not a ledge, donald trump to power is already preserved. america is coming. yes, donald trump is already here, all of europe is already standing, if some american comes a president who will not help us if the united states leaves europe then the end many other american citizens are talking about trump i am 700-50 dollars in luggage. yes, about due to the fact that they will not be taken away from me, in theory, yes, and moreover , do you choose a biden one. i, plus $ 750

, the main question here is that the republicans come in a broad sense for the same americans in the counties in the states, it is very important that the local legislative assemblies and municipal bodies are occupied by the republicans. it's not just trump in the white house. here also such is the republican wave , which the democrats, it must be said, repulsed, they failed it in the last elections, if the democrats now, it seems to me that under the current conditions, the democrats will not be able to honestly win. and this means, most likely, they will draw honest conclusions. yes, to the most honest elections, as in the twentieth year to the most honest in the history of america , where people will vote urgently to talk about whom they buried back in 1865 at the work of vladimir chalein, so that he understands that he needs

to take mail or schedule phones. i would like to return to the concept of foreign policy that was published this week and i must honestly admit that it is very difficult for me to compare and compare it with previous documents, because it is actually revolutionary in nature and will most likely become such a starting point for our new russian statehood, which has been formed for the past year against the backdrop of a special war operation. i want to touch on some aspects, because it is really voluminous and the whole world affects our vision of the relationship with

him. in principle, there are many mechanisms. it specifies what our approaches are, but in my opinion. this is all secondary, because the most important thing is what appears in the concept of foreign policy. this is the goal-setting of us as a state, and this is really very important. you see, here we are not so long ago with colleagues. those who work in universities lived in a reality in which the main goal of russian higher education was declared to be the preparation of a qualified consumer, if we proceed from the fact that citizens of russia should be like, uh, in the form of their self-determination, qualified consumers, in principle, they should not give a damn about russia sovereign states, not a sovereign great power , regional local colony, chat. the main thing is that they, as consumers, have access to cheap goods, services, they can use them, and that's all and until we have determined, what is the point of us as a state and why should we be a great

power? why should we fight for sovereignty property for change world order? until then, let's say in those conditions when we proclaimed ourselves part of the same system, part of the same value orientations, ideologies, and paradigms that our western partners then existed. here is the answer to this question. it's very difficult, but if you recognize the same values, the same ideas, the same ideals, why are you against the fact that this western world is expanding? you recognize it as a blessing. well then, let them expand, and you will be in a subordinate position, do not pretend to anything. here in the concept of external the policy of the russian federation says that russia is a state of civilization, translating from russian into russian russia is an empire because if you draw a parallel between this and what we understand as an empire in a good sense of the word, then russia will make very little difference - this is an association of peoples who claim

a very significant role on the world stage and have a single culture. i would like the most important thing to be said several times that russia proceeds from more than a thousand years of experience of continuous sovereign states, that this in that period, while our colleagues there in the west design it by destroying our own culture, civilization, history, we, on the contrary, declare the continuity of the entire historical process that took place, uh, in the case of our state, which is especially important for me. the concept very specifically refers to the main enemy of our country. this is liberalism and it is openly said that liberalism is used by western countries in order to impose beliefs and ideologies alien to our traditional values ​​on our country and ours on other countries in order to undermine the traditional system of values, and that russia will now oppose this in connection with this

the only question that arises and i think it needs a wide public discussion several times it is said that we will oppose the attempts of the outside world to impose on us this pseudo-humanism and, uh, neo-liberalism. a. can we then allow it to exist within the country by itself? well, not the americans will impose, we have inside the country, mentally unbalanced people who really want to spread this man -hating ideals of science education. cultures we believe they can do. and it will not undermine our traditional values. i think not. i believe that because it is an ideology in reality. she is not trained. it has no basis in reality. this is a human -hateful ideology that has no place in our humanitarian sphere anymore, not in the case of external e, support and promotion, nor in the case when the initiators are some

our internal forces within our country. we must clear our state for liberalism and never let it in again. inside the consciousness of the mind of our youth. they must be brought up already on completely different people very precisely to give. the definition of what radical liberalism is completely agrees with the holy word of the liberals, the holy word of freedom refused in a raider way captured by a group of extremists who, under the garden of freedom, mean the right to destroy the divine nature of man and to legitimize all possible perversions that is why i say, yes, that a broad public discussion is needed for this, and we must answer this question for ourselves, the second thing i want to draw attention to is that the statement of our commitment to traditional values, firstly, implies very specific values. there we are not talking about what was usually said about jenny for a long time, that there are some universal

amorphous and values ​​that are the same for everyone, quite specific values, religious traditional religions of our country. here's what it's all about and what it's about we will simply declare we will act. there are very specific mechanisms spelled out to say that now russia will proceed from the fact that its features of the national structure, religious traditions should be taken into account in the further improvement of international law in the field of human rights. i consider it so. a wonderful initiative and so many countries will support us in this direction, because today there are more oppressed people in the world than believers are people of traditional beliefs. no, they can't find these people today a foothold for itself, because the main hegemon, which proclaimed itself as such, the united states of america is directly engaged in destroying the religious tradition in the world. and these people have been lost for a long time, and today

it is in russia that they see for themselves this conservative superpower that can protect them. i consider this to be extremely important . it says quite interestingly about europe, it says right away, right at the very beginning, it says that we have a very historical europe deep. uh, the tradition of such cultural interpenetration that we are very connected with europe and it is said that russia will not. in general, from the outside, how easy it is to observe. how europe is pursuing the policy that it is pursuing, it says that russia will create conditions for it to stop its anti-russian policy and switch to normal good neighborliness and interaction with this federation, and here i just wanted to touch on the issue. yes, who is europe , because among all regions of europe the penultimate one is mentioned, and the last one is mentioned by the usa and other anglo-saxon countries. and there the accents are already placed

in a completely different way other anglo-saxon countries. there, in general, one paragraph and it is written that they will change relations, change not there. let them speak in hell. anything to do. we will not interact with him. the united states is that we understand the responsibility. just entering the door will not work, it is necessary to at least proceed from the balance of the strength of interests, but in the case of european countries and their associations, that is, we are talking about the continental europe first of all goes here in the case of these countries. we really should. this is because i also believe that it would be great. for the americans, if we just turned our backs and stopped working in this space. i think they need to be brought to a heart attack there and make sure that europe is divided, so that countries appear there with political regimes and political leaderships that come from the same narratives that the russian federation and understandably we cannot do this everywhere, but what is obviously certain space, for this there is no doubt in my mind, in general, which is also

very characteristic in the concept. and probably the key role of the near abroad, because it is with him that the description of the various regions and positions of russia in these regions begins and it is said that these countries are the actual zone of strategic interests for us, it is said that we will not allow no, friendly countries, interferes with further integration of partnerships and two very important points. first, that there will be no military infrastructure on the territory of these countries, states that are not friendly to us. secondly , there will be no color revolutions on the territory of these countries. this needs to be heard not only by europeans and western countries. they will hear it, i think. this must be heard in these countries of the near abroad, and they must understand what is for them. violation of this red line will in fact be equal to the loss of statehood. they must realize this. this is no longer the same russia that

before that could close its eyes somewhere, somewhere try to compromise, somewhere you will hear something with some arguments. now this red line. russia will not tolerate any other countries in the zone of its hmm strategic interests. and it is not only the united states of america that could intervene and upset the balance of our interests on the territory of these countries as a whole. what does the concept of foreign policy tell us? what she says is that russia has really comprehended its role on the world stage as a conservative superpower. it does not proceed from the fact that it says a lot about that, by the way, this is also such an embodiment of our orthodox culture. it says the diversity of the economic and political development models of the state is not the globalism that the americans are promoting, that everything should be. sign in the same political system, the same economic system, the same technology russia says there must be diversity. why does she say so, because russia is an orthodox

country, orthodox nationally in its essence. it never claims that other peoples and other ethnic groups would somehow adjust to suit themselves, unlike western christianity, which is universal national always comes from the fact that it doesn't matter if you are an italian, an argentine or a pole. in general, the structure and everything else should be absolutely universal in the same way. this is also the embodiment of our culture, it is precisely this that makes us very competitive admirals in the space will hear us and will definitely focus on us, but russia does not proceed from any illusions, because this text does not say anything about what you know. that's the whole world , all states should be absolutely, and have the same capabilities in the world politics. it talks about such a thing as responsible leadership. it is very important for the leading states right now in this period, when a special war operation is taking place , those countries that in the future multipolar

world will want to claim the role of a responsible leader. they should prove themselves now and not wait and why they asked about europe, because there is such a cretin of the surname, we know that he represents some kind of structure called but there is not a member of aries if i understand correctly, it is not at all he represents the european commission, he is a high representative of what

the european union of the european means is.

the most important word for europe after the first world war is fear. great fear. it was the despair of the leaders, who could no longer manage by the old methods. in the thirties , it was not by chance that the nazis themselves, most likely, could not come to power. there had to be a mistake. even if someone these mistakes, no one understood. thirst revenge together. well, everything will go

differently. is a member of it no of course what the fuck he's making a statement trying to point out something he has nothing to do with. this spanish fascist cretin, betraying the views of his youth, is completely mad. he is generally about what the beginning of the representation of russia with this security. it is suitable for april fool's day, despite the fact that russia is a permanent member of the security councils violates the very essence of the right of the temple. what