they either perverted them, or perverted themselves , and therefore everything that they interpret is initially perverted. that's the problem. i 'll give you an example, you can say it's some kind of theoretical thing. it should be supported by some practical example. i have, please, a few years ago regarding. i will not call them journalists. well, probably employees. e french magazine cartoon magazine, you also know the question of how it is, yes, how it is

interpreted by journalists, regardless of interpretations and regardless of our understanding. how did this so-called editorial board come about, who works there and what they do there, but we showed solidarity with the truth with people who declared that there should not be and cannot be violence in the representatives of the media in this sense, we really showed unity solidarity and mutual understanding , mutual support, we have shown an understanding of the best of these very aspects of the values ​​that they declare. where are they, after all, they desecrated what they proclaimed for many years, therefore, if we talk about statements about the unity of the security council, for our part, we are committed to everything that is written in

the charter of the united nations organization and these are their problems. and when i consider the western media , there is a feeling that blinkin is calling sergey viktorovich, i immediately demand so harshly. how do these conversations actually go, and the americans don’t know how to do it differently, they have forgotten how, they don’t have a culture of dialogue, after all. they are no one for many years. i was reminded that they are the same state as many other states with their pluses, minuses, problems and put in place with achievements. and in my opinion, in our comments on the results of this telephone conversation, we will talk about this directly, the conversation itself is really happening. i can't imagine that a linguine can afford to feed sergey viktorovich here. the question is not what and how it is not in tonality. the question is, what questions do they pose. they do not want to hear or even perceive what is so

possible to talk as much as you like on a common topic, but there is the fact of an american citizen, who had a visa issued as a journalist who had been issued a graduation. as a journalist was taken red-handed under the word red-handed, we understand absolutely specific things and he was taken for an attempt. secret documents, you understand very well that this means that other interpretations cannot have everything, but that's all they are not going to consider and are not going to even analyze in any way. they want their model of reality to prevail. and in fact, that's what happens. you look a second time at the sharp giorno, is issuing some petitions with a demand. almost there the ambassador of the russian e, send somewhere all the russian journalists for a minute. wait. stop for a second. let's, let's take a look, at least this

, uh, uh statement in the wall street journal is inadequate in terms of their value, because they were talking about freedom of speech then, and here russian journalists. they should have been the first ones to even say sort it out however you want journalists, wall street, jordal times, they consider him a journalist, but do not touch others. they also never yielded to professionals from this area, but they could certainly write about them at some stages. they covered this topic. if they demanded something like that, then they would probably not be there either. do you see how they get out of the nets out of public life in general, what is it called? cancellation culture, that's all, so they are well aware that they will have to pay tomorrow for social security for a. for a house for well, they don't have a mortgage, they have taxes and so

on and on, of course, so they perfectly understand what is possible. and that they can’t, and we see it perfectly, and it’s great to react to it in the same way. do you remember when we talked about the fact that in response to the closure of the russia today channel we are responding to the expulsion, and our journalists to the persecution of our correspondents. you remember what they said, but they didn't see it. they said that no, there could be no retaliatory measures against journalists. it can’t be, but the sanctions were imposed against journalists. they are americans, they told everything. you are their system coordinates are logical. it's just not journalists. well, but they told you everything that there are journalists. and there are those who , as it were, are not journalists, when we say well, if you

reason in this logic, then we don’t even need to invent anything, there are journalists. and there are those who hide behind journalistic activities, in fact, they are engaged in espionage, get it and sign it, but this is unpleasant. it turns out that you can apply to them everything that they used to apply in relation to others. they don't want it that way, they don't like it that way, so they start like this to twitch, call, demand, scream , squeal, well, different representatives of the united states of america showed themselves differently in this situation in different ways. who they don't. here i am , too, yelling at us is absolutely pointless. thanks mariu. vladimirovna now advertising after it we will continue our evening.

so cool. what can destroy right now and therefore russia is leaving rather, and what is waiting for? why, then, does he look at how under 200,000 ukrainians have already died every day, grinding in artyomovsk into a bang? or wag your tongue is one thing, but do something other. but then he took it and said that everything, like a little, there was time left and it was so tough here, but something was missing before that. or he thinks he has. well, well, 200, well, 300 tanks. will this change something? we will put 1.500 there. what's the problem these tanks

are great? square well, let's arrange a parade of this equipment, of course, it would be good to spend splinters for this drug addict, too, on may 9, 45, well, in the tradition that developed then, it was not time in may, but according to that tradition yes, when to take prisoners and lead the nazis not ukrainians to the nazis , there guys on what is the name of the front? those who are on the other side of the germans? we treat the enemy very calmly. he shoots you, and then we

feed him. we don't mock. scary i'm a shaman kick you out. well, what are you, this pedastic moron has not yet opened up to the front, what's stopping him? well, or should zelensky be constantly instructed? yes,

for some reason they are all constantly hysterical hamsters. here is the deputy minister of bandera who, for his bandera view, was published from germany, he is now still rude to the germans. no, ukraine has its own brains. no, they need plans the operation of ukraine that is, except for meat. because they treat their people like meat. not only that, it was clear why we cannot stop and we will not stop in this regard, by the way, well done

trump, who clearly said how it would all end. and what, by the way, i think the ukrainians with a friend, because you know, if trump becomes president.

there 100,000 prepared 200,000 prepared. well, let's use such a weapon. you know how he arrives. it doesn't matter how many were on this square, it doesn't matter. it's not enough for you to keep someone. the traumatic charge is scary, we have never seen the consequences. and soon, apparently, we will start to fight. it’s completely different vladimir vladimirovich well, okay, you know this when i watch these footage from the kiev lavra, and it’s not surprising who, uh, is fighting for control over the lavra, yes, but under the auspices of all these epiphanius bartholomews and so on . yes, it seems that the orthodox church of ukraine is considered to be an orthodox dog , but whoever you don’t see here, it means

this satanist with nazi symbols. it's all over there today. uh, for what to take away church, uh, orthodox at the monk's. yes. uh, the monastery temple was a supporter of the catholic church. i am the catholic. that 's why everyone should have access to the kids about themselves. no, despite the fact that the lavra museum everyone always had access there, no one asked what religion, but in the end. well, maybe st. paul's orthodox then in the vatican. oh, well, that is, well, must have access. why, then, do catholics sit there, and here it means, in the lavra it is necessary for a satanist to give it to the catholics, and to anyone, and this, yes. this is the satanism manifests itself around the lavra, it is noticeable everywhere in all e, in all directions. uh, wherever possible, here you mentioned the nazi

melnik uh, who, the deputy ministers of foreign affairs, has now gone up a little from the embassy council after the war in ukraine , there is no nazism of course. well, look how, uh, the united states general, miller spoke there just the other day in congress, and whom he remembered he cited as an example. yes, ukrainians. can i ask you a broader question that you may not can you answer, if we never supported the ukrainians at all, would russia have conquered ukraine by this point? i think without western support in the first place. i think that the will of the ukrainian people is unshakable. these are the same people who are the sons of great people who fought against stalin. zhukov for 10 years 1941 to 1955, so the ukrainians are not easy to conquer, no matter what, even if they fight with a pitchfork, they

will fight back, but i must say, they probably would have lost significantly more western support territory. i have no doubts about that, which is why i think western aid was critical for the ukrainians to be able to defend themselves. well, first let's remember. e. well, we think all these words of the ukrainians are the sons of those who fought against stalin and zhukov, that is, remembered. zelensky's grandfather fought from 155 against stalin and zhukova, or wait, about something in the soviet form on the grave is drawn, probably, after all, for stalin and zhukov fought, as well as actually, the ilvin's share. e ukrainians, who then existed, they fought in the ukrainian fronts in the ranks of the red army. against nazism, by the way, with the americans. or, probably sub-substitute, by the way, they fought. from bandera yes, my grandfather was killed by bandera, the price, why the fact that a millilite , maybe for a memory, but it was stalin zhukov who were

allies of the united states of america, not those ukrainians who fought against stalin and zhukov, but at the same time, yes, it turns out he now glorifies nazi bandera collaborators. it’s openly frank , it turns out, you see, these are the people from whom the american generals are now taking an example, that we are really surprised, well, in ukraine, there is nazism. in america, probably, there is no nazism, but for some reason they always glorify nazism and nazi collaborators. today, the daily telegraph newspaper published an interview with a new ukrainian hero there, pilot voloshin. i don’t know what his heroism is, but zelensky allegedly awarded him the title of hero of ukraine there. he is a falling plane, took him somewhere, which means in field. well, i don’t presume to judge, but the fact that since then everyone has been interviewing him and dividers has been mentioned by the telegraph at school. eh, the nickname of this very pilot karay. oh well,

while modestly silent that this nickname somehow miraculously coincides with the nickname of the famous german nazi pilot nazi backlash. yes, and who , in fact, uh, then was considered by them there as one of the best, if not the best pilots of the second world war, is also a coincidence. here, no matter how you take it, whatever one may say, sometimes they have swastikas, sometimes they have nazi symbols, that means. they have nazi heroes everywhere, but in ukraine, nazism. no. this is in this sense, of course, it's amazing how they themselves forget against what and against whom for what ideals they fought, the same americans in world war ii, it turns out, it turns out, those who fought against zhukova stalin were probably allies uh, but uh, at the same time, you know, when i watch how these western comrades again reached out to ukraine in a row. bunch of prime ministers. today. tam khabib came from germany and everyone goes there, they carry them, then they took them to the storm, then

they celebrate the anniversary of liberation somewhere else. i'm thinking everything, except for the hungarians, mind you, nobody came to build something. only hungarian. we arrived, they say something, we are here to school and restore the kindergarten. yes, and moreover, they were destroyed by the ukrainian troops again, but they arrived in the storm and let's, let's remember. look, this is the year of this very tragedy. with a crime that russia has committed. well, at least someone really said, and where are the materials investigations? well, at least someone answered. as a result, a simple elementary question. so where is the data that the guardian published that the lion's share of these dead in the bucha are people who were injured by shrapnel. here are these harpoons yes, well, fragmentation projectiles, striking elements that are used by the ukrainian armed forces. where did all these photos of the guardian suddenly go? it’s not just that someone’s opinion led to

a photo. yes, they brought the materials of the case, where did it all disappear? why these prime ministers, the ministers of these habibiki and so on, suddenly stuck their tongues into who knows where and completely forgot, because no one is going to investigate. why because, as in the case with the undermining of the northern streams, everyone knows perfectly well who actually killed, how they killed, and that it definitely did not happen. uh, the way the western media portrays a mass execution, especially russian military radio. yes, they don’t know a lot, they know a lot, and that’s about those events that are connected with the church, that is, they know perfectly well that the millennium, that there is a thousand-year history, that kiev is the mother of russian cities and, first of all , orthodoxy, and this has a sacramental, this has such, but a historical significance. this is a shrine. this is extremely important for all orthodox, therefore, therefore, i do not find literally anything about the west speaking and

, uh, somehow condemning, because in fact, but for any person, and the west is also he and christian protestant here. well, i don't see there, there were conversions. uh, patriarch kirill had appeals, but secular authorities to other confessions. well , silence, silence, that is, because we have this event in the lavra, but this is something else , this is something that is not worth mentioning. and now it's coming. e zelensky's power, it performs a very important function, and does not mow. this is all downright cynical. that's all, that is, today they are already saying that charged militants, who will purposefully now be in the near future , will initiate, and some kind of provocations in these territories will beat people capture temples. and if not , they will set fire to and shoot down it all happens, that such artyomovskaya is already very close to finally, of course, therefore, therefore , pr to kill the losses, artyomovskaya,

of course, for them bakhmut for us, the release of artists. and therefore, now now they will drag and drop in every possible way to cut off any comparison with and interaction even at the level of churches with between there with slavs of different origins between but the communion within the church, that is, it should be cut off and secondly, man listen, well it becomes pereko. the field, that is, he does not have this basic one, but the relationship to the church to his land, in general, was extremely important in the resource of christianity, in general for all slavs for thousands of years i. but now it’s just taken and cut off, but a person has already been deprived of their language, they have already deprived of history, as it stands for, the first letter p is poroshenko ah, but he also created it. this one is the first letter - this is poroshenko usually he wrote in russia. well, i and another with the letter p

refers to understandable to whom in particular and to the one who has now betrayed orthodoxy and defected to the side of the finished , look, but if we pass on orthodoxy , after all, it was passed down from generation to generation, that is, children to children to i mean , zelensky is not there from parents, but here well, in this sense, probably, yes, here, but you only understand when for several years it’s all the same. new resource organizations are emerging. well, you can go to it. and what kind of canons are there, some kind of couch a lot of children, but poroshenko has many children, therefore everyone needs this smuggler in the church. do you know when they got it? yes, there is a voroshin that he did not read the sprouted. there's a lot of stuff in there. no, they stopped a car with cigarettes at customs. yes, it turned out that the chocolate was overlaid on top, and the cigarettes of the city were hidden inside, we walked , of course, listen, i know, i'm here, looking at what is happening now. there, in any case, it can either repel

only the ukrainian people, who must remember that the people and what they have there are roots. faith is, religion is sacred. who is this? these are people usually people are like this, for example, young men who yell that he is satan or those who scoff at naruto, this is a girl. and here, which, well, just now such a symbol of the struggle, i don’t know what will happen next, but this is her act that causes the deepest objection. here is the ukrainian people. who is this? it's her or her chase or detractors who arrange, as if not without a nipple dancing. on these men, yes, that is, there old age does not come to someone with wisdom and brains and intelligence. here, yes, that is, it is very hard for me to imagine that, uh, at death. well, they say yes. if now because of this

information is confirmed, but in fact it is very logical very logical. because these demonic dances. they really are. they are terrible, but they just push the e people. well , they just turn, well, ukraine ceases to be a people. they, well, stop losing their spiritual core. and for which either now they will fight, or they won’t, or they will reconcile, or there will be a hut of extremes, that is, then, yes, then everything is with the people in fact, all then he will be the most scattered destroyed. and just then they will put an end to themselves, there will be no other option here, but here, you know , here is the second moment of death, after all. and vladimir on the tatar max fomin e. it’s clear that condolences are here, of course, to many people who he was extremely dear to, to whom he was a person who carried the truth, and that’s the value of it in my opinion, uh, and the subject. why, in fact, there was a complete attempt on her, this is from a person who told her the truth from he was on earth and denounced her here, yes, that is, because without giving the opportunity to create this virtual appearance of hostilities, because people

this is his category, they are here, he is sasha the cat. e, there, a similar and so on, that is, these are people who are all the time. there they they can't cheat. they do not lie, that is, they convey what is happening, and there their judgment is exclusively based on what is really happening, and at the forefront, therefore, he was dangerous by this to whom and in ukraine, the topic, those who need the virtual world to those who , but owes to those who need to create an image of victory ukrainian in that those who need to be made afraid. that's what they need him for. for them, he is dangerous and the same military correspondents that exist. they are the dangerous ones in your program is dangerous. that is, when it starts, when a connection appears directly with reality and with the media space , it’s so dangerous, because i really want a single media space to build a virtual virtual introduction that takes place in the war and that now you know what but when a terrorist attack occurs, it after all, not against a particular a person, that is, a specific person against

society, of course, you need to sow panic, you need to make it scary, you need to intimidate, but there is a fundamental difference in our understanding. where did this come from? or it exploded here, that is, if it came from outside then it forces to mobilize forces to unite. how do we know for sure. we know for sure. how do we know who is from the ukrainian special services and do we know the names of all those who were behind this, how they worked? how did they do it? you know when we know. here it is extremely important here that we not only know, but those who bear responsibility for this, so that they really suffer. but because now you know, the ukrainian authorities. today, she is so fat, and there has never been a well-fed, but rich power, that is , approximately, so they all start zelensky of the whole company there. you like them to live long deliciously, and there they are very, very comfortable. and in the hole of the nazi elite also gathered in life, and so they build

millennials, they will understand. it's only then when a threat looms directly above them at the bottom. that's when they will be responsible for their actions for their orders for their provocations there, which they do for inflicting blows on our well-known people. that is , they personally must respond only when they feel pain. here, then it will be a question. listen, what for each for each such choice will fly back. that is to say, nothing is for nothing. nothing, but will not be unpunished because of the punishment will be. that's purposefully here on topics not just in ukrainian folk, on which to sneeze yes , because they are ruining tens of thousands, artyomovsk. there are solidarity and everything else, they are personally on them when it comes to their wealth, when it comes to their physical, when it comes to their security. that's when it becomes scary when that's when personal responsibility comes. decisions being made and i now you know, i think that after all well, our school didn’t do it, and

they saw vaseline just now, did he just now look at this hari, it doesn’t even matter what he says. you just watch him looks. he's absolutely, a downtrodden drug addict. we can adore further already and it doesn’t matter. see what he looks like and will pay for it and he can't understand, can he? these are the ones and that's it. in ukraine, they should know that they are thieves cowards and these scoundrels cannot lead to anything, but then the people will not get anything decent, that is, they can only ruin the country and destroy thousands of people, and having paid for it simply for their well-being . they consider it permissible, so sorry for the people who do not understand this, but there are people who don't understand it, but they want to understand it. nobody forces them to run and shout that they are satan. so they must answer for it. well, sorry, this is a war by satanists, if the ukrainians do not want

to cleanse their land, this is one question. if they want something else. yes, this girl on her knees is strong, and the men with weapons who continue to go to die for satanists. who do they have? dear friends, i invite you to our next edition of the besogon tv author's program, which will be called 11 friends. piggy i think you understand why we named our program that way? looking forward to seeing you?

the most important word for europe after the first world war is fear, which could no longer govern by the old methods. the nazis themselves, most likely, would not be able to come, there must have been a mistake. elite though, who are these mistakes, under no one will hitler's policy was based. here, in the thirst for revenge, in the thirst for a place, the calculation was that the germans would win. well, everything will go differently. that's what they thought, and hitler tells them about it. video