how to calculate the killer among the killers, and where can he hide? can you kill a person depends on what this thing is saturated with? girl firstly, the soviet troops north korean ours with ours in the air, only ours went in the air only ours there no pilots, basically, the united states of america at times on their knees were sure that the story with us was 45 years old, let me remind you,

the ultimatum delivered to us according to iran why did we withdraw our troops these ultimatum is not a war, the americans are sure that it was all war is important, as americans it is terrible, then it is terrible. he was just preparing the german units in the way that he was sure that after they would immediately start a war with these german units against soviet russia, they were preparing and there was an operation, drawings, not thoughts, but sorry for the wars of the soviet union in the united states of america in the truest sense of the word in our interpretation of their interpretation. they led all the time. you are quoting them, american sources for whole years - this was not the interpretation in these years. fine. it's extra once. it was with them that they always once again confirm my thesis, which is that today's american society and

american politics are built on an absolute disregard for reality , it doesn't matter what it really was at all, yes, we are trying to abide by the rules and we abide by them unilaterally order , international law died in 1999. we will soon celebrate a quarter of a century. are we still pretending with all our might that it exists? yes, we still recognize their intellectual property, even intellectual property in their territory. here we are not recognized in seconds, all our telephones will turn into bricks. they don't turn for some reason, because it's google. this one is cut off about once invented, it's cut off from there. i don't mind any move. excuse me, but your phone works on google , can it work on my phone? yes, here is the telephone yandex surprised when your phone dies the software is worth it. it is worth

american well, everything that, returning to the topic , everything that you do not produce yourself in today's you don't have it in the world, because at any moment it can be cut off from you. if you don't waste time trying to tell someone, yes, i understood it better than everything that the authorities then slammed. no, i 'm talking about what i missed now. yes, you can not restore it, because with all your desire. you can all gather in the duma to pick up a pick, you still won’t get a cell phone, because you won’t be able to produce everything that is needed for it. but if the specific laws of production do not, finally understood it, what it needs to be produced for, what to produce now, because now cell phones were being produced, another 7 years, they were producing all the stuffing, who is china well, then, forgive the stuffing, you can bring a significant part of this stuffing. we are now stopped. you just told me fairy tales about what you just told me, that these

phones, please forgive me, are a fairy tale. no, this is not a fairy tale with a pocket. i couldn't have it in my pocket. i would bring you here a phone that was produced in russia. come on, which one and there inside it will be that they found a hirim microchip, there will be our everything there will be russian produced. microcircuits cut in russia excuse me, we have tanks on machine tools, one of them is still not loaded, you hear it was made. i saw this is all chubaisism, which once told everyone. here's how he made a light bulb phone. yeah well, okay. say what's easier. in general, do you believe in the division of labor, do you even understand what costs are needed? that's why there is a stupid world. what do you think of the whole set of idiots the world of people is forced to say that there is frantic problems of chip production, which are in taiwan and for some reason they cannot ensure their sovereignty. but now russia with a domestic market of 150 million. here is this biden, which you are laughing at, which

is currently developing this production at home, could do this, because it means that we can show it now, because not everyone can produce us, because that you do not have, unfortunately, production bases, because everything takes time. and do not deceive yourself, not a business, i bought a wild amount of equipment that is constantly bought, which is still not his own, because if he bought it, software from him, not his own. this means that he will have to bring all the spare parts from there, but talk to people who are in real life. here, build a plant and say, i did everything from scratch for the fatherland is impossible. teaching - teaching states. ra-initiatives were created by money hunger and produced in the field the usual one, which you now deny. i listen. let's take it to the duma and write the demands. let him think, finally something will freeze sportloto written. oh see yeah

why are you working? sportloto then their voters put this defense of their voters that they can do nothing. who they can't do anything, they can't. tell me now that russia cannot do anything native. yes, i am a jew. i guess russian is not my native language. well, you probably have a russian check, native, how do you confuse the concept of everything and nothing. i say that there are specific areas that cannot be produced right now , which means that it cannot be produced. all. no not this way. i say that it is necessary, that what we ourselves do not produce from us at any moment, can be taken away. you understand that we cannot produce everything. you yourself think in a world that can produce everything on its own, so you go further, or it’s good that there was such a country 30 years ago, and you lived in them . you really didn’t like it. uh-huh i just had the soviet time and everything was

fine. i just want to remind you that in this country, jeans could not be produced terribly. and it was a tragedy, so when you speak, everything must be understood that you are going to reduction in nomenclature is another question , is it good or bad? i want to remind you that in that direction. in which everything was in name, but not in quality, and everyone dreamed of western cars, and western technology, if the soviet union was ideal, he would not have died, this is not a category of reason to throw out a child with water. this category of demand restriction, what i'm talking about, therefore, if you are ready to drastically with the rise of japan what demand restriction is there people to pay normal money. but what difference does it make to protect the market with protectionist measures, what will demand enough for development? of course not, no, because you can deposit now , of course, but we'll just spend the transfers now, but this chip will not give you, because the consumption of chips exceeds the capabilities of one country, but these are elementary things. this is an opportunity

to establish the production of chips so that you have production in this country that will not allow you to develop such production. if you have everything provisioned, then it will allow. yes, what a difference will grow on these, because you need to understand. how much does it cost you need to produce hundreds of millions of cash production is always cheaper than the 150 million population of the entire economy is now flying. you need that there were at least 500-600 million consumers in japan 128 japan are producing these chips. they also buy, because the economy works differently. if normal, arrange the economy will be enough. and in which country is at least one normally built. name and why in china , in fact, they also buy these chips according to soviet ones. they are not really broken by the reality of the normal built, which says what kind of north korea they don’t have phones at all, what kind of well such, and you can’t

imagine you can really do it yourself. here again i can’t hear, then you can do something yourself first. who is this or all? one country yes enough everything, i understand. that's how andrey began to do it. as i understand it, the show has, in general, already passed. yes spent as usual in the house we spent 30 minutes in the house without interrupting each other. well, excuse me, then these are some lectures. well, i didn't understand. how much time should elapse from the use cancellation. with that remember let's say the abolition of the exam is not gives a good education a good education also gives a good teacher. cancellation of the unified state examination will not happen automatically without the unified state examination, because they need to be educated separately on something. and that there were good teachers, it is necessary to build a completely different system of textbooks preserved. yes, textbooks have nothing to do with it, to start salaries. you learn to pay teachers, and the teachers you have are in the municipalities, they are in

the general state, you at least change this. now i won’t peck at nuclear weapons, so right away where it’s normal, i’ll give time, as much as you like until morning, we will talk immediately to the point first, of course, what i wanted, i agree. i would like to say that you understand these visits of europeans. i would n't say they are that stupid. the fact is that xi jinping came to power with a project of the eurasian project, but in reality this is a global project for the unification of eurasia , when here is the belt and the path that ended, in fact, in europe, and when the macron goes there now, he will remember another thing, that these european leaders can never understand one thing is that xi jinping stopped believing in them. i can tell when he stopped believing in them in may 21, what happened then on the thirteenth year of the six and a half years

of the great and lively negotiations between the european union and the people's republic of china and china. about the investment agreement on december 30 on the eve of the new year of the european new year. this agreement was actually signed by the european union at the behest of the united states at the behest of washington in may of the twenty-first year. all this was not corrected. from this from that moment, xi jinping understood very clearly that it was impossible to deal with the europeans, and that was it. if, look, chronologically, from that time on, a very rapid rapprochement began, and for the gays of which this was the last one so far, at least the culminating point was this visit among the ding peni here and despite the various statements of the fuqing, as representatives of the official e chinese people's republic in the european union that this is, as he said, boundless friendship - this is just rhetoric. is it surprised or should it be

look. this is a real translation, so that the ambassador would allow himself to go against the statement of the head of the country and the wording itself. this is just rhetoric. we must see the chinese ambassador allowed himself such a wording and was not shot the next day put that i think that the chinese in any chinese way agreed on their speech, and before that he spoke about the incoherent and contradictory speech of ursula funda last thursday, when she marked the line european union in relation to china is one of key do not care. but when you talk about your boss, what he said is just rhetoric. that's in my opinion, in my opinion. he also agreed on this, showing the europeans what was next. what kind of development, what if the europeans can now break with the united states, if they

change their relationship with the atlantic yes, if this atlanticism is leaving. then china can establish relations with them , you understand this disrespect. yes, you cannot, in relation to the leader of the country, the leader the parties use disrespectful wording, they will remove it in a week or we will see the accuracy of the translation, because these are the ones you really need to read. in any case, i am guided by what he said, before that, the same ambassador, as when he assessed , uh, the speech of ursula vonderlein, the key thesis, which was that china should change its behavior towards russia in relation to a special military operation. and that's when we make friends, that is, this is an ultimatum is a condition, which resulted in the ursula foundation. it meets there once in general, in general , together with the macron of the bundle, and that’s all. and she has no more protocol events

planned. in contrast to the same cormorant, it is another matter that the europeans, of course, are now trying to settle for them. any settlement, even on the basis, will also say that we are ready for yours , that you proposed a plan for a peaceful settlement, but the fact is that the americans said that they did not agree to it. i don’t even say how much the ursula fund is here, she is an atlantist, she will play according to american rules. and in general i think that she keeps a close eye on it. god forbid something the guy suddenly throws out. although, i'm sure to follow the macron, i'm sure that he will not throw it out. sorry for the cruel joke, but the fact is that the macron in this case acts as if somehow also a national leader. he understands that the french economy is collapsing, that the european economy is collapsing. yes, macron, european, atlantist still, well, after all, he still has france, so they are trying to play on this. here i am talking about what is for the syzontium

zemfin anyway. uh, as if taking his line, he holds it firmly, judging by the way he has been leading it since the age of 13. since may, 21 years old. he understood everything about europe, if until the composition of the european union does not change there, but nothing will come of it, new lines, leaders. and these new leaders can only come as a result of, i would say, radical revolutionary changes that have not yet been seen in europe in the near future, so there will be a nuclear war and you will see everything ah. no, the use of statistical nuclear there are no weapons, and today i say, can i enter into this dispute again today in this water? i will not enter the second question. this is what the thematic start with our donald trump is about, but i think that this application may be much earlier than many people think.

for example, i, as a person who is very supportive of trump, is very sympathetic to him, because these are the destroyers of the destroyers, and he, most likely, he is doing his holy work and now he will not do it from the hall to the court. this is the case since the case of storm daniels. this not one thing. there is also the state of georgia fanilis, which is now preparing another case in the prosecution that he wanted to reconsider, the elections, that a special committee is sitting on the events of january 6 , 21, and that there is a special prosecutor who seized documents in larga, that is, trump will probably not get out of court almost next year. that will begin in december, this will not prevent him from becoming president. and i'm not saying it won't hurt. it's just that i've seen sometime in america, uh, the election campaign, when one of her leads from the walls of the court, obviously this

could not be seen by definition, because the only case with the police was a guy from the south, and then for the races on uh, carriages to see hail yes yes poet, therefore look at how this will happen, the republican election campaign will come from the courtroom this is a very very interesting option, of course, they just choose, of course, i was disappointed that trump was not taken there, nor handcuffed, that he was under the knees i didn't yell at the policeman to breathe breathe well, that would be great, of course, and trump, maybe even on this you understand that then trump would just be for sure. sued for propriation. because right now it is very tough, that is, it is impossible to sue for sure, for sure , he could have repeated the thesis of a very no one who is in the golden coffin. e before that. yes, probably, or in america, yes, yes, that's why it never happened with this coffin.

so he went to his place in deer, from there he said this speech with a golden coffin from floyd, probably, then they figured it out, so this is a problem, which is even deeper , the fact is that when one state, new york, the prosecutor of the surrounded states, new york makes claims to the former expression, firstly, the president surrenders, and the other the paratrooper staff is also a good person. he directly stated there i will not extradite. this means that this is how we are doing. they. in general, they have always been in the same state. we will not allow to deal with the opposition. he's a presidential candidate, i just think, yes, donald trump's freedom when the attorney general state tx will file a case against biden. in connection with his unscrupulous actions of his son or the biden family in connection with china

and about the baidu. may everyone be free from each other, tahas will be free. well, the republic of california will return to its native mexican bergs. trump was, of course, a charismatic figure, unconditionally passionate. so very attractive, but i never had any illusions about him. actually, it’s not a fact that if he becomes president, he won’t get even three times more weapons there, but exactly. opportunity as they say to break up that's it, here he is in general, to some extent let's hope that he successfully plays the role of yeltsin in.

e. as they say, it is, of course, a symptom of the american crisis unequivocally and the main crisis between the old white america, so to speak, wasps, but they understood you, well, so to speak, that traditional america, which is another america that has been iranian mexican black yellow for the last decades, whatever by the way, they have been writing about this for a long time. this is a conflict, it represents our interest, to bring him to the end. this, as they say, is the main thing, but the fact that in itself he, of course, is not a friend to us and not not this not a brother. it's clear. now, regarding the chinese ambassador, after all, i wanted to insert it there, of course, it looks rather ambiguous here is an interview. you are right. of course, you need to know the translation more precisely in general, because the chinese language is, as it were, a lot of variations, but i don’t agree with you guys in the sense that when you say, but listen to this, china is

a difficult side and then the first one is not necessary and the soviet union was a difficult side was the opposition. brezhnev was in opposition. khrushchev's position was listen to stalin, and they allowed themselves anything. it is impossible to think that china is a kind of monolith. this is a complex large country with its own undercurrents. i think there are a large number of westerners and liberals, as we have much more than we have, they and they are much stronger of course there is a pro-western vector for sure for sure it exists and he is not happy with what to do and washed down and chairman sin must definitely deal with this reckon with and reckon with this. i personally don't have. let's see. what will be the result for a week there, even if it is not easy to remove the ambassador listen listen, i have been watching since my late father. in this

system, brezhnev worked in the soviet union , sometimes he could not remove the ambassador, you know, the forces were completely different. yes, it doesn't happen quickly. this is not done quickly, then there is its own struggle inside the apparatus and it goes on cruelly. listen to me, general vareniki told me about being present when okhrameev was directly against the entry of soviet troops into afghanistan it got to the point where he told me that his son, the minister of defense, told him, you are comrade general. gather to follow the instructions of the bureau at all or not. that's what the conflict was, you understand, and you always have a treat with us that the soviet union is such no , it was the complexity of the system and the power supply is a less complex system, therefore it is quite possible that this is some kind of internal manifestation of some kind of undercover struggle . i have a personal

feeling that i am almost completely sincere in my own. steps and the main thing that confirms that he is not calling green. he does not call zelensky. even though he's under pressure. by the way, i think they all went in order for one to have the phone he already has. yes, that he called for them is important. it is important. it will, as it were, give something good to russia there, but it will still give some importance to zelensky. this, i think, is the whole point. no, he hasn't called yet. and by the way, if even now he calls after such a period, this will already be an indicator. therefore, in this sense, but we must understand that there is complex is the game and in the pictures circles. and that's a big tricky part. now you can now after a small. come on now advertising is given.

this is purely seen by the totalitarian sect and the task is to gather around itself disillusioned people. paganism received registration from the ministry of justice, as the national faith of ukraine, this wooden idol of the god of war perun was discovered at one of the bases of the organization of regiments banned in russia. and what kind of enemy or their own, which is the weakest, their task is to turn the russian population of belarus into ukrainians so called in absolute rose. now, after

advertising the sixties, a big mistake. equipped with the most advanced weapons, and for this you need to use the soviet experience, because i must say that the soviet experience was actually based on the general traditions of russia and the russian empire, as vita said , a well-known political figure

of the russian empire in his time is a military empire. and the soviet union was a military empire, and not because it wanted to start wars all the time, but because in the most natural way, and we now we see our states of a vast territory with resources that needs a large army to guard it. this is what we are coming to today, and most importantly, the fundamental mistake that has been and is still being made by our elite, including, of course, the ruling one is the idea that the soviet union died because of the arms race. and i think it's wrong. it is not true. firstly, in my understanding, the soviet union simply fulfilled its mission and handed it over to the russian federation. now it will be our turn your mission. okay, that's a question. maybe controversial, but the main thing, that is, in any case , someone is arguing. i am convinced of this.

well, the main thing is that the problems of the soviet union were not connected with militarization , not with the arms race, but with the fact that the model, which was a modernization model that worked in the twenties and thirties of the rigid vertical, it no longer worked in the 60s and seventies. this was the problem. they don’t say so, not in the arms race, the arms race was a powerful locomotive that pulled the soviet science to the soviet industry, and the country in general, as they say in all these, therefore, this is the main mistake. and it was necessary to introduce in this, as they say, market relations. by the way, i am a left-wing marxist. well, marse didn’t write anywhere that he shouldn’t have a market, he didn’t have it at all, and china proves the experience of the chinese, that is,

new economic levers were needed. it should have worked. but this should not have canceled, so to speak, our defense industry and our army, the army should be powerful and large in russia and there is nothing to be done about it, as he said, who napoleon said, don’t feed your army, you will feed someone else’s. this is how it is with our vast expanses, with our vast territory, with the resources that we have. and resources. it obviously ends in peace. now there is a question about water. they are already raising the issue of water, which should be shared. and who will share, and it turns out that it will be shared mainly who is there brazil russia india china is who has the main reserves of press- fresh water about it direct? well, what are you talking about? well, it all needs to be protected and there's nothing you can do about it. and it is necessary

to reject this thought by itself. uh, the army must be powerful strong and big. she left the time of victory, just some kind of devilish strike, i knew him personally, but not much, he was friends with my daughter in dasha , they destroy those who are the real inspirers of our people. the methods currently used by the security services of ukraine are similar to the methods used by ukrainian nationalists in the thirties and forties.