so, and if they cleaned up how important it all turned out to be in the new york tysonpost good question and why after that all this time these leaks are shoved into the information space with their feet. here is for me. this is the most important thing in this, well, in this matter, and one and a half dmitry ivanovich, i am in your position. yes, i will break it down about the second wave. i mean half. this is the first half. when i looked, this is a retelling, here is the second wave, yes, sisterly. you're leaving already read all this somewhere. who am i? understood, so i i read all this in our telegram a few months ago and for quite a long time up to the accuracy of verbal turns. and you know, i could be wrong, but i got the exact feeling that this text is about how our politics works here. and as with us, it means that now all this is the same, he is bored

to fall. i said no, here is the transcript copied. yes, i'm copied from everything. that's the one, well , swamps dryazsk. e pseudo-hypotheses pseudo-knowledge scandalous yes. uh, fighting nanai boys. uh, in this very telegram it’s taken from there, because up to some speech turns. but this is my figure, true figures. well, this is my working hypothesis. that's because, well, i'll tell you purely. here i am well in this sense, as a person who received a historical education. well, who read it before? a? well, it was done. i can't believe that what is called intelligence would write such texts as the text well corresponding to a special way obtained,

there intelligence and so on collected from , uh, social networks of open sources. i believe, i believe, but they are directly reproduced there. well , this is the half that i wanted to add to this question is now about poland. do you know how to ensure their firm position, damn it? because they are hopelessly behind. here, well, they are completely behind. they believe that they have come into this position, as if this is america well, 15 years ago. here, you know what's the matter? here is a phrase that everyone liked very much, that if ukraine loses it will be the beginning of the end of the golden age of the west. here it confirms my statement. the beginning of the end took place a long time ago 15 years

ago. what will it only be in the future, you understand? this is very pleasing to him. you bitten. well, maybe he's groaning? i don't know, yeah, okay. okay, this is slow. it is unusually characterized with the fact that they are very fast. eh, here, but somehow it happens the other way around. do you know why this is very well, by the way, the example of poland is why it did not find itself in such a situation, being at least 15 years late in its strategic self-determination. and this is a common phenomenon for the west, they have only now begun to fear that they will begin to decline the dollar, that they will not have hegemony. now just this

being late, by the way, it's no coincidence that's all that volodya showed himself. all the time this word sounds dementia of our authorities dementia of our officials dementia is the key word , it closes, of course, on the physical condition of the bytan, as soon as they say not ours, yes, well, that’s what they said to them games. here. well, that's why it closes physically. that is why. trump plays with all this very clearly, because here i have listed him. how cool are all the leaders with whom he enters and even leads, he is the coolest of all he leads the whole line. well, a number of really cool guys, it will be moronic kim, but he is at the head, he is cooler than all these cool guys, but

that’s not the point, it’s so to say, they’re all cool, but he’s twisted, yes, and then he says, well here is biden. he is very strongly associated with ukraine and the democrats are very strongly associated with ukraine and what will he ask rhetorically if ukraine does not win? well, anyway, i think that this will be the main issue of the next six months, from which they will work very intensively. he said that if he wins, if he doesn’t win, we still don’t know what to do when he was a competent stacker. well, i'm one of those, because i don't know. dima where can i know what to do? when well, indeed, the frs itself told the frs although the day before yesterday everything was fine on the eleventh, and on the twelfth it turned out that there would still be a recession. it's just so small, they say, we will have such

a small one until the recession shows. yes, i did not win the fluctuation, well, they encouraged, but did not win. yes, the second black rock is not so khukhry-muhry. this is uh, this is reality, how his very serious people are very serious people. now it’s been cleaned up, it’s flown in, it’s literally right there. actually it is necessary. well , if we're talking about the same thing, i'm like that. they showed a long-range hypersonic missile, that is, the americans could not, but the chinese problem. here. he wrote somehow embarrassingly to the americans. that's why see the recession will be precisely the creation held here inflation black rock said will not be defeated. we will have to lower the rate. this is the second thing he said, well, and the third, of course, they began to count the forecasts. it is interesting that they began to count themselves, who would have thought of their budget and figured out the terrible numbers.

the day before yesterday i said 400 billion. with an increase, there was a deficit this year. i was wrong. 627 something 21 6 23 means a drop in tax collections in tax revenues reducing an average of 10% for different types. uh, all of this uh, all of all of these receipts. well, that's an optimistic forecast. i say that the budget deficit is one and one trillion is reinforced concrete. well, here, uh, people with critical thinking. eh, american you think that, in principle, this is a direct road to two. was unsecured. in terms of collection and income. yes , holes in the budget, two trillion gap between income and expenditure. now, let's add another moment to this, then i don't know what to do. dim yes, well, that's up to silva

formulated. everything is very clear, he says, we all need a different system. and who says approved that the dollar should be the equivalent of everything we do not agree to say that a new financial system is needed. here we are in in principle, we are going to china in order to discuss it, this is the main topic of our conversation. new financial settlement system. the brazilian says it and so ours said that in general, the main thing, probably, one of the main goals of his visit to china is to raise the question and, uh, the goal of creating an alternative, uh, financial settlement system. world here also has collapsed with rather rigid criticism. uh uh, dollar. well, if we add this, so to speak, to our own american problems. by the way, they began to recognize a strange thing they say such an unpleasant thing inside, but the banking crisis has not gone anywhere already. this is how

the sword hangs with us and in general, everyone is twitching like that, because, what if it suddenly falls right on the head. this is extreme. this is extremely annoying. but in these circumstances. well, you’re talking about supersound about hypersound, yes, let’s add here to find the scales. well, poland, after all, they are historical followers in this sense, dmitry gennadobievich. they cannot say that they made the wrong choice. well, they will give birth to them from ukraine. well, i mean for the benefit. american master, i remind you. and you know this better than me in the twentieth of september of the thirty-ninth year. uh, there were also newspapers on the internet with stories about how the british troops were approaching warsaw and, well, they were discussing in what form the polish troops should participate in the victory parade in germany

. . yes, all this was circulating, so there is nothing surprising here, the choice was made in favor. uh big uh, big master in that sense occupied. well, completely anti-european anti-russian anti-chinese, that is, who is poland poland is an american absolute vassal. here he is against everyone who is around so to speak. well, i hope i made the right historical choice, but if you look at the history of the historical election. in poland, one can say that everything was repeated exactly in general. well, here's one on one. without any e, without any slightest changes here. that's why, uh, i don't know what to do last. yes, i don’t know what to do trump said about this and it seems to me that all this summation, which is around the so-called contrast. here it is also caused by the fact that,

you see, the question arose. what if not? and what and a everything is set. and what if not, well, now let's go. and if not? but well, the answer to this question in the light of all these framework problems that i wrote, this question becomes critical, really critical. here and uh, in this sense, the decision can be made, but it hesitates in the american headquarters. that's how interesting. yes , i think that she, of course, is still accepted and, of course, they will go, well, the degree of neurological disorder. very high very high and how all levels fluctuate all levels of decision making in

the united states fluctuate. i think it's very revealing. and it is noticeable now in general with the naked eye. they can't help but go, because yes, yes. i just need something because when you have accumulated so many people of technology, and so warmed up the expectations within the country, if you don’t go in contrast, then you will go with me, kiev, and you can’t retreat and advance. it is forbidden they will not go there to demolish this power, because kievskoe because they must be dissatisfied with someone. and this, by the way, is one of the scripts that so far hasn’t been read in vain, because , well, there are in my guys in uniform, like the same cheese and type there, who understands that they are writing us in case of failure of contrasts, a further they begin to think about the tradition of ukraine's hetman. maybe it ’s much easier for them to take power themselves to overthrow zelensky’s corrupt officials with his comrades. and on new terms to trade you existence recognized as a crook. you trade- you existence is not quantum. this is an option.

it just pushed me, literally another 30 seconds a minute will allow. eh, why in ukraine they vibrated so much from these drains of everything else , but it’s also interesting, yes , after all, how the concept of ideological and psychological control of society inside was built, but this is a senseless sacrifice, drunk from a military point of view. after all, what were they creating? well, there we have heroes fighting, because at this time we are preparing a terrible, which means that the dagger blow that i give will bring down the cursed dragon immediately. and then suddenly it turns out that the owner comes out and says that somehow it doesn’t work out with a dagger strike, and they got a kick there, wait, as they say both on and we, that is, were dying here, but you couldn’t. is it not good to prepare a contrast, we didn’t agree on that? i exaggerate and simplify a little. yes, but the circuit diagram is just such

a question, it will be simple why then they would keep it exactly. dmitry yes, well, let's start from here and i will start for ukraine, if i it is allowed to call the territory this way - this is a strategic direction. everything is really complicated there, but for the united states, i would not overestimate how important the counteroffensive would be. what a successful offensive will be unsuccessful by and large, here is a strategic one, well, even a medium-term sazagic one of some echelon of time. it’s all the same, they continue to do what they actually intended, continue to carry out the alarming containment of russia along the western border and successfully while not one american. let's say they don't fight there, but they officially fight. they get off, just printing money for shells is taken from an ally. so some of the most everyone is sent there, we are not participants in the conflict. that is, it is, as it were, not

a direct war. they continue it. this is a very successful such thing, whether it is in place. chinese comrades, i would not overestimate the connectedness of the united states to, uh, ukrainian scenarios, because there is something in depth planning in the united states even instinctively. even here, when the brains were knocked off at the level of instincts of those people who taught them there in the military academies and at universities. of course they do it all. and uh, the same not a direct war involving the taiwanese population. and maybe some volunteers from somewhere else will hope for this, you know, they can arrange it in the same way in this sense, they consider for themselves the stomp successfully on it is obviously another matter that the internal tension is there inside the united states they certainly don’t let them give them let's just say that playing all these games, at the same time, the main problem in washington is not that they have every single person there, uh, hesitating with making his decisions. and the fact that there are a lot of people there, but four is already a lot, and there are a little more of them.

that's which, depending on the internal political configuration or events taking place in the world. it is he who, on behalf of the united states , is carrying out foreign policy at this particular moment in time. and so today it's like this, and tomorrow it's a little different, because we mistakenly accustomed to consider washington-monolithic. well, let's just say in the days of clinton and reagan. so that's roughly speaking, ah. it seems to us that this is a fluctuation of our own washington. and these are the weight coefficients between these clans, in which each each has its own each each has its own interest in this all over the world . account. for us, this means a simple thing, that this is a tactic that they recognized as successful, which means it will be applied. it will be applied. they will continue to apply there. until this case is brought to a close, it will be applied against china, if not in the taiwan area, then in the south china sea. please do not worry. just passed the largest of this exercise. it’s not just that you, and not

the philippines, are pumping up weapons, and they have supplied so many weapons to the philippines, i wonder what it turns out that it went to ukraine? no, they have somewhere else so that in this sense, i didn’t worry about him, moreover, the man who is hated by everyone in washington despite to the fact that he constantly sits there, and john bolton advises someone. i have this is a man whom kir carlson is so fond of in our country. how would i call it, just parasitic, the worm of which it picks out once washington, it again germinates , picks out, germinates. let me remind you that ronal himself sent him with a traig. that's how he got his advice. this is reagan, who, as it were, escalated the cold war into the soviet union, he sent it around like the philippines. that's either given. all i am now is not in indonesia or the philippines, right there in the ocean with since then, how to send it there in scrap to indonesia, it is considered, as it were, generally far away, however far away. well, he wrote an article, of course, which would not have been taken to the magazine for face, but he wrote his article, of course, disgustingly hawkish and generally stupid, but the structure of thinking is present. he also

states that he is a man. in general , he is practically a brainless center. he himself and two assistants. well, that's what the experience of working in washington means. that's what the experience of working together means, where is the strategic planning? let sometimes on the wrong grounds. let's see, he clearly laid out everything today will be. that's it, if you listen to me , it'll be tomorrow. that's it, after it happens. this is what will inevitably happen next, and then we must attend to the next crisis. that is, of course, this is some kind of crazy idea that now russia will inevitably lose in ukraine under the diode regime. putin, i understand, yes, that all this seems once again on the cap to the base, but it's all calculated. and then the most the main thing is that china does not get, as if access to the coast was removed. yes, i honestly understand why the greatness of strategic planning? no, consistency, even this cretin still has the remnants

of systemic thinking, which modern cretins lack completely about this. now i can now, as if once again, for my part, say, so he is on the wrong grounds. in general, he is, as it were, a well-known fool, so to speak in this sense, but how they are used to thinking, and what they seem to have in their hands. how do they manage their deeds, but the chatter is really a fool. well, he ’s a fool who pumped everything for what he took, yes, a man with a fantastic track record, he’s based on the wrong maximum option. this is a known fact. well, how he thought is directly visible from the article very well. by the way, if we have it, yes, absolutely right. and if so, if so. that's what i think we're missing. this is exactly this, of course, there are not enough fools. well , for example, let's take comrade ant. he

also teaches anglo-saxon comrades from this all sorts of talk about the poles can be about the fact that we congratulated them for 15 years like this. everything is wonderful, but in the place of marovetsky. so, if that's by and large in hamburg. look and what would one of us do on the site of the move? yes, that's exactly what he has. it’s just that he will either hand over poland simply by personal decrees, so to speak, overthrow duda, divide more in half, give one. i don’t know who in the united states of another russia and go somewhere to the canaries or do what he does, especially considering that he seems to the financial system is much more flexible than that of the same germany, he drove up. this, by the way, is the same let's act. so it's another matter that for poland it is always the same as for any state leaving at the junction of two large systems. it ended badly. but this is not because the poles wanted to be from the customs husband geopolitics is playing against them. but, by the way, in this sense he acts quite systematically and for this matter. he says, so through me will go, weapons. grandmas with wheat will go through me there will be what i say and they listen to it. that is,

he wants to work as such a traffic cop at a crossroads. he said, military grain and financial are right there, but absolutely right. and what are comrades erdogan doing? it's the same thing that's making these historical alternatives succeed. dima, you understand, yes, you can suggest that she is still there . ekaterina persuaded these idiots. be a normal territory on the way of russia to europe , you live yourself the last decision made without days off, but divided more. sorry comrade. stalin explained to you up to august thirty-ninth year, that it will still be so. i also think that there is a difference, between the righteous is the only thing he can, yes, he's just the problem is that he can't do it from the fact that it's normal for you to come from everything as a leader, poland it's okay yes it's okay to make peace with russia, he cannot not submit like that. this geopolitics you can't

be a little, the state was a great empire. they have a residual desire for an empire of a nation that once was, but i'm sorry, than a state in europe yes, no, well, or the empire, they still do not say conditionally. yes, and so on. i'm relatively speaking, i'm gone, but it was a big strong power. and this is mentally preserved in many peoples who have already lost themselves again, they want russian cities to return. here i am, this is what i'm talking about, in fact, the byzantines still have to carefully come in handy, in fact. here, yes, clarity, uh, which is present or not present there? i personally do not think that they do not have, they really have some kind of intelligibility. the elite is in crisis. elite in irritating no, coherent foreign policy, all the more gone to the european union of the united states , but from the point of view of systemic thinking. they

act quite consistently and in addition to all sorts of boltons and morozitsky ones. there are people who, in principle , if you give them the helm, and as the crisis develops, at first they rule everything, then it’s bad, then they give the helm to someone. you have to be ready for the fact that they are ready for systemic actions. well, let's say to put under control or seriously set fire to our entire capacity. they said here, they are in state, because they thought systematically , we didn’t have anything lying around there and the system works. why yes, why, as it were, so to speak, navalny and other people were not presented with a political announcement under the article of treason? because, but because there is no system, they didn’t say there is no system , it was considered the previous model before the special military operation, it was believed that to communicate with agents, mi-6, without being really a person who recognizes some kind of state missiles. here are those who know his state secrets, who can ride, and this one communicates with a gentleman. how but we can roll it systematically and intelligibly under this article, so far none

of them have been rolled up under this article, despite communication with agents. but, when he got up to communicate with agents, other articles went again and now, when they talk to the people , that according to this digital law, that under these things it is necessary to say clearly this to acquire with the people, you need to talk and explain to them intelligibly that this is so, and tomorrow will be this one. and if they do , then they convince like this, it’s very important to convince and explain and convince enemies to talk, and like-minded people, of course, and it is necessary to pay attention not to the diving of enemies, then he hates it anyway. them. you have to try to please. and not to lose your base, this is an eternal problem. it is not true. i really want to like the enemies. i think that at night, but friends and so supporting a deep delusion, in general, the peculiarity of the russian elite was to strive to please the enemy and their own, and so close, if poland, of course, brings memories of

the state from the sea about poland. to the sea, only she was never like this for the simple reason that from the sea to the sea was white russia when it was strong and was in alliance with poland for the last 400 years , pulse has been constantly engaged in provoking wars between someone and someone and then losing them herself. it's starting. well, at least the northern war, when russia was drawn into the northern war much more. union of the saxons, well it was unitary at that moment of the state, and then russia had to save the polish king from the swedish commandants of the swedish generals , and then everything was the same until the 20th century, when poland offered england to france

to defeat germany in 930 so that it would not be possible to destroy those of her they sent in particular, because they decided that there would be too many of you, a lot of you would end up with what ended in the thirty-ninth year, although poland really expected that anga the french would fight with him, opalés would enter berlin now they are about the same. and this is the same. it all the time resonates with the systemic thought, then every time they run into being beaten into other greeks, which they themselves provoked. i'm sad enough to talk about it. i have a good attitude towards basic historical poland, but now they run up every time from each company and ultimately take the wrong side, by the way, if about the counter

offensive. after 2 weeks on april 28 , an interesting anniversary of the 105th anniversary of the accomplishment of the ukrainian central rada dispersed it german patrol when the germans occupied ukraine at the invitation of the central rada, which invited them to fight russia, secure their independence , as a result of which we were forced to sign the brest treaty on these conditions, on which ukraine signed there, but organized the southwestern and romanian fronts opened the front practically called on the germans, and the germans overthrew her 28-29 unambiguously skoropad general aga hetman. six months later, they asked him and left with him. that is, these games, as a rule, end in this way in expecting someone to come. you bet on someone.

he will save you, then again ukraine in the twentieth year tried to negotiate with poland by giving her western territory for participation in the war against soviet russia ended with more rural russia dividing ukraine but if you still go to the european level and at the time of the drains so, when first to the russian building, i watched it all. i had the impression that, uh, a black space of informational noise was being created, so that everyone would say something incomprehensible was going on here, that here it will not be important to drown out the real problems of ukraine's flows with this black noise. china whatever. why in this transcription the fact is that the conceptually strategic usa in ukraine is trapped in the superpower trap, they cannot retreat,

because then they lose everything, they lose prestige and everyone can tell him, you failed, and the body missed on the other side . they already understand that they cannot win. this means that they get a protracted conflict, for which they must be responsible for protracted long-term conflicts. they are bad because they attracted someone and built on vassal relations nearby, they say, well, we actually, as a true vassal, should stand up. and what for and why? how long does it take? you don't get anything. that is, you can make a lot of claims against our swa. but the fact that they cannot win in russia on any of the fronts. this is much more painful for them than the fact that we did not take kiev for us, and in these conditions the question arises. and the point of significance is that the more effort you put in,

the scarier it is to lose poker in practice. from here, you have to get out of this. they have back-up options for how these things go. and this election comes, another party, says, there are some going on and something has been lied to. america is not responsible for this. they were crazy. look at their president. and we came in order to fix everything and somehow podlotat. then all this becomes the subject of an election campaign by 24, in which the democrats lose precisely because they did not succeed, not because they started a war, not because they quarreled. with russia because they did not succeed and dragged into something divisive, some kind of long standing unpromising.