little russian ukrainians, the so-called absolute grew hello on the air international review. my name is fyodor lukyanov today in the international review program. event of the week chronicle leak of pentagon documents failure of intelligence agencies or the triumph of disinformation in the united states are studying the consequences of europe

a charismatic young gun lover willingly handed out top secret documents sensitive pentagon papers the new york times specifies that he is 21 years old, and he serves in the air national guard and the group itself is a collection of tooth rocks with a russian friend, hanging out in game sandboxes. so the open world games came to this very open world. and well, put it upside down. a huge archive of information that

tells about the course of hostilities in ukraine appeared literally out of nowhere, it is believed that this is a leak from the pentagon among documents satellite images of the consequences of apu strikes on various objects. the assertion that russian pmcs tried to buy weapons from turkey and prayed for an attempt to supply weapons from israel through third countries to report losses, and in two versions. moreover, one contradicts the other to establish the authenticity of all this information, it is very difficult because of two features. firstly, the documents were not laid out in a single archive. they appeared for several months in small batches and on different resources. the most exotic ones like discord chat, the popular computer game minecraft or an anonymous chat for mud-slinging trendy youtube bloggers.

and secondly, these are not text documents and not even their scanned copies of this photograph of often crumpled papers. this seriously complicated the search for the original source and, more importantly, confirmation of the authenticity of the papers themselves. some of the messages are directly denied by the defendants, for example, israel categorically rejects the information that the intelligence agency urged employees to participate in protests against judicial reform on the other hand, difficulties with the use of gps-guided jam bombs may well be true, the american military is not the first time complaining about the use of electronic warfare by russia. earlier in the teacher , they confirmed that at least partially, but the archive of this politician promises citizens to figure everything out. where does the 21-year-old reservist get access to such a level that a dozen not the last countries are in a fever, the question is not an idle

one, of course, it happens, the former bradley is not a chelsea manning informant, wikilex about the iraq war also did not come out for ranks and years, but earlier leaks looked more solid and motivation. the height of the vietnam war us state department strategic analyst daniel elsberg, handed over to the newspaper, the new york times, pentagon documents on the country's participation in the vietnam conflict, a dossier of almost 7,000 pages contained information about the operations of the us military in north vietnam. misleading the us congress for disclosing the gustayana elsberg. it threatened, 116 years in prison on under pressure in general, in reality, the court acquitted him, a year later in june 72 in washington

included in the election campaign. the police detained five people who were setting up microphones in the us democracy office in the sergeit hotel among those arrested were former cia agents and nexon campaign staffers . the news did not affect the electorate. parents and nixon was re-elected, however, the scandal gained momentum. a washington post source under the pseudonym deep throat claimed that the traces led to the very top . conversations in the oval office. and the film is accidentally damaged. at the most important point , it became clear that the president personally tried to interfere with the investigation. after that, impeachment became a settled matter, even for the republicans , nixon resigned in 2003. american diplomat.

joseph wilson published an article in which he stated that the josh bush administration unleashed a war in iraq based on deliberately false intelligence back in 2002. he was convinced that saddam hussein was not going to buy yellow uranium for the production of weapons of mass however, white the house deliberately did not make public the collected information a week after the publication of this article, an action of revenge followed in the press , a material was published that revealed the identity of his wife cia agent undercover valery, this put an end to her career and endangered her and her loved ones the white house rejected everything accusations in the fall of 2010 on the wikileaks website, which was created back in 2006, hundreds of thousands of secret reports of the us army were published data on the costs of the operation in afghanistan, the so-called iraqi dossier

information about the content, prisoners in the guantane, as well as diplomatic correspondence, us embassies papers spread around the world edition it turned out that the river's secret data was passed on to military personnel by bradley minning through time wikileaks published a huge array of confidential correspondence from us embassies in 2013 edward snowden former cia officer and agency the us national security service handed over about 200,000 classified documents to the guardian and washington post newspapers. then he fled to hong kong there. he told how american intelligence agencies monitor internet users and listen to the conversations of foreign leaders. this caused a whole series of international scandals. snowden confirmed that back in 2010, the us government authorized hacker attacks on foreign political parties and organizations in the united states

, he was charged in absentia with espionage snowden asked for political asylum and remained in russia. but the content, having studied, was taken for granted, now no one will say what is real and what is not , the same commentators refer to part of the information as true to another part, as an obvious falsification of the question of faith, anything can be proved, which means that nothing is possible top , irrevocably further plot moves , predictable behind the young dunce, someone stood from the rednecks of the trumpists, yes, russian trolls through competing clans in the dawn of the community, and again all versions are of equal reliability. she's not authentic when

on the face of malicious manipulation. this is bad and worse. if it is not clear, someone deliberately fools, head or total communication environment. he lives his own life, confusing the confused people themselves. maybe it's time to connect the neural network. full for the salinity of the information space. it kind of provokes the further development of artificial intelligence, which should somehow cut off all these moments and at the same time, you know, i ’m still an optimist in this regard, it motivates a person, because how much the car didn't release options, no matter how she does not racialize it anyway, as long as the human brain remains a better ministerial tool, if it is sufficiently well supplied with blood, which is sufficiently well cooled. but you need proper circulation. i think it's a good challenge. and this is once again a return to

the fact that it is time for a person to begin. to return to himself more and more responsibility, for the solution of which he is still trying to shove it onto the car. tigranovosin does not professionally feel military-political issues, and he also translated into russian an outstanding american scientist part-time consultant, intelligence robert jervis, the main theme of the classic error of perception of distortion of information in international politics. how to go beyond prejudices to look at the subject from different angles? what the late jarvis was and good and great he had an incredibly cold analytical and hard mind professional mind, and at the same time remained an incredibly receptive warm and human scientist, which helped him to correctly navigate

relationships where the human ends and where service and everything else begins. in the middle of the 2000s, the memoirs of george tenet , the director of the cia under the late clinton and the early bush, were published. according to him, it was not in a conscious deception , but in the bureaucratic, as they say now , hedging, the desire not to upset the president with conclusions that contradict his opinion, in the course of work, saddam’s assessment most likely, there are no weapons of mass destruction turned into point of view. perhaps adam has a message to the center. he had to simply take into account the considerations of his security, that somehow, even if he was cool, the service would not figure him out. that is, to present the material in such a way that

it would be distributed and circulate within the service. secondly, he must consider what kind of wind? and a trend in the offices of power to talk to people who, roughly speaking, on whom his life depends. it is at the primary level that the report is being processed by the officer who is responsible for the character. it is clear that in his tone some words are softened, some are toughened, in the end. all this mass of information reaches the analyst of the supreme head egg, who must filter this information and provide a side view of the weekly. so this analyst, no matter how he is, no matter how benevolent his superiors would be towards him. no matter how well it relates to him, no matter how well, let 's say, receptive. it wouldn't be anyway it's the same here in such a friendly situation

favorable, this analyst will begin absolutely unconsciously reporting this iron summary and it was in the language that is pleasant that he began not to desire, there is no search for information there, and the desire to make information as convenient as possible to speak. the same jervis, analyzing the failure of intelligence in iran and iraq, noted that the limit of what many politicians expect from intelligence is associated with another limit. how close are the consumers of intelligence products to the level of education they are expected to be? promises to become a box office series in the scenery of a real war 15 years ago, the coen brothers released a black comedy. after reading , burn the evil cartoon. for any intelligence, the leitmotif of the film rules the world, dementia and

paranoia. he then seemed a witty grotesque no longer seems. in addition to our sochuvian reservist , french president emmanuel macron became the heroes of the week after a state visit to china, he gave out a clear basic meaning : china is not our enemy with taiwan, everything is ambiguous without looking back to follow the united states. well, a favorite in europe needs a strategic autonomy. head of the european council michel agreed about independence. the polish prime minister of morovets exclaimed that europe needed not less, but much more of america from the other side. the atlantic threatened to let the europeans deal with russia and ukraine on their own, since they don't want to help with china. in general, the response is great. and evbranka is an american cartoonist following the results of emmanuel macron's trip to china, a knife in the back of uncle

sam, the classic image of the word to michael kaminsky does not reduce the intensity of the struggle, apparently, this macron is returning home to his wife, here and a chinese balloon and clouds, thickened in taiwan and a traditional rug from the flag of the usa paulo kaleri from germany china in the form of a dragon that says macron and voila here is the third train of power literally in the power of the ring is an extremely provocative drawing of mr. yew of france, he is literally rude to macron . a person like him says we should not humiliate china in any way, china macron is a talented speaker, especially when problems inside the mass protests against pension reform do not subside and it would be good switch attention. but he is also, perhaps, the only one of the european bosses who has a complex

perception of the world to call it strategic thinking, the language will not turn, but the french president sees the trends and relationships and understands that europe is really vulnerable and rather hopeless, hence the appeal for change is another matter, that even the most eloquent appeals are not capable of changing the state of things europe has already put everything on the united states and the longer the military-political crisis continues, the tougher the connection, even if the senior partner behaves quite unceremoniously. in september 2021, australia terminated the contract for the purchase of nuclear submarines, which it concluded with france back in 2016, under the terms of the deal , the french contractor was to supply her with 12 submarines worth almost $ 70 billion, which would be the largest contract in the history of the australian navy however, canberra opted for

a us- uk security and defense alliance and the contract effectively intercepted washington's original speech. walked about the fact that the boats will be created using british and american technologies, but will be built in australia, the french media called the break in the humiliation deal an insult and a knife in the back in protest france refused to celebrate the anniversary of the naval battle with the united states and high-ranking representatives of the military naval forces of the republic returned ahead of schedule from washingto. in paris , the leaders of the aucus alliance eventually decided in march that australia would buy eight american nuclear submarines in the next decade. it will be three ship, such as virginia, and it is not clear. these are new boats or from the us fleet, and at the second stage, new nuclear-powered ships will be built according to the british project and with american technologies, but not in australia. in the usa

, both the british and australians will use them, the crew will be trained in the uk and nuclear weapons , while there is no talk, but the us has already approved the sale of 220 cruise missiles to australia. tomahawk sharply criticized the agreement by a well-known australian politician. polking him sometimes they call one of the authors of the local economic miracle, when, due to trade with china , they managed to raise the welfare of the country. king and now i’m sure the confrontation with beijing only harms australia. or karenko, a prominent historian of the cold war. why did the european army never arise , the idea itself appeared a very long time ago. according to the idea

of ​​​​a european army, it appeared in 1950. and it was france's response to quite specific circumstances, since the north atlantic treaty was signed a year ago. but it was only an agreement without any military structures, and around the beginning of the fifties, the united states of america raised this question about the need to form nato military commands. uh, and so on, moreover, they raised the question that although the frg is not yet a member of nato, nevertheless , it is necessary to take into account the german potential and at least 10 divisions of the potential west germany of the frg should be formed and then, uh, accordingly, all this should be included in the common nato army, uh, this caused a sharp negative reaction from germany's neighbor in the first place. this is france, which was absolutely not ready for such a rapid revival of the german military potential and offered, uh, options for the european army, eh. the difference

is that in nato there would be entire german divisions, and in the european army there would be mixed battalions where there were french and germans , dutch, balti and so on under the leadership. well presumably french sergeant. that is, it was such a safer option from their point of view. eh, well, and the project began to be developed, that is, they took part in the discussion. all those who at that time participated in the process of european integration. that is, it is a little. yes, six countries. e, united states of america e. well, at the beginning, this idea was not accepted too much due to the impracticality of not realizability. well, then they realized that france would not agree differently, in general , they were given the opportunity for any rearmament options in germany. this project discuss one more. the motive from the united states was this cost-sharing, because it was assumed that the nuclear umbrella of the american army divisions would be european if they formed one.

the number of these mixed battalions and they will finance their preparation, yes, to help ensure that uniform weapons are, this will generally reduce american costs. the main thing is that all this is consistent with the general plans, and indeed, if we take the document declaration on the creation of a european army, then the last two points we will see that it says in the event of a serious conflict in europe, the army comes under the overall command of nato, it is subject to, uh, the joint command. it obeys the strategic plans of the need, that is, it completely flows into all these ideas. further, this project was discussed , discussed for four whole years, and was never completed. uh, the ratification process. there force different reasons. well, and first of all, probably, the fact that the europeans were not ready, but often remembers to invest the president's decision is dividing that this is the sixth year, and the exit from the military organization. can you call it nato? practically implementing

the principles of strategic autonomy or there were more external effects. this is largely due to the personality more with his understanding, in general, of the role of france in international relations. from the year 1958, he began pushing through the triumvet for people, because the decision should be made by three countries over the usa , great britain and france as an equal participant. well, the idea was not supported by the allies, and then he started some other. yes options offer, for example, a plan for a political union within the framework of european integration. that is, here we have six participants in this process, the famous plan fouché plan. well, it's not so much a defense organization as it is a political organization trying to, uh, coordinate foreign policies cardinate inform. here, how would it be in this vein? yes, well, here, first of all , the small benelux countries gave their voice, who immediately said that who will protect us in this case, if well, it will be something

create in a dogol vein. ah, in terms of defense, we are not viable and refuse the guarantees of the american and odin. that is , it is not necessary to do this. at least. and now, therefore, it turned out that this project also broke down there, too, because nothing was discussed for 2 years. in fact, we didn't agree on anything. here is france's withdrawal from the nato military organization, but not quite from nato. yes, we see that she remained in political structures, and she was still aware of some processes and e themselves yes memoirs to more testify to the fact that his words were, if there were serious conflict. yes, well, that serious conflict of the cold war, which was considered in those years, then we will be with the west. based on this, by the way, again in the washington treaty, and guarantees of collective security, the official version, it is not declared and sacred, but there are skeptics saying that there is no automaticity in the use of force in response to an attack on

one of the allies. there are no discussions going on in nato on this matter. when did it start negotiations, actually on the creation of nato, they were closed. well, by now, part of the documents, the published part of the memoirs , have been published, and so on, and it is immediately clear that the discussion was, on the one hand, within the united states, again, yes, the executive legislative branch. uh, their authority is their prerogative. it is necessary to sign the treaty in such a way as not to strengthen the powers, like aggression and the second discussion is a discussion between the americans and the europeans, because the europeans expected automatically in the guarantee, as it was spelled out in the brussels treaty, so that in the same way, yes, it worked out in the north atlantic as well, to which the united states well, not too much. yes, they wanted to go the other way in the creation of nato , both sides were interested, that is, europe , which wanted american security guarantees, and the united states, which wanted a presence in europe and disrupt the process. eh yes, negotiations on this, in fact

, it was also not in the interests, therefore. discussions such as very sharp tense hot will end it all ended with the fact that the fifth article was written, we are streamlining the contract ratified including in congress and were in congress. now leave the discussion, yes, at the time of ratification, and here, despite the streamlined wording, there were assurances, uh, of the executive branch that the interests of the congress would be taken into account, that is, these are also open materials available, such as congress. yes, in these forty-ninth years, this is all possible , and therefore, there were such promises to be found and that the promise must be kept, and it manifested itself already in the fifties, because just now, yes, returning to our first the question arose when they began to form the nato army, the question arose of sending , including the american troops of europe a and the president e trume, at that time he agreed to send six divisions and immediately after that , the reaction of the congress that the president

had no right without congressional consent to send these divisions. there is the so-called great debate in congress, which ended with the fact that, firstly, not six, but four divisions were sent to europe, and secondly, the president said again that without, uh, the consent of the congress. i no us ground troops will ever go anywhere. here, well, and further, and vietnam. we remember the tankin revolution, an administration was needed in order to send troops and so on, and there are competent people in the congress in congressional committees who remember all these discussions and promises. that is, here is such an ambiguous situation when a discussion is needed. uh, and you have to convince the executive branch, as they say. and how much time will it take? well, moreover, then there was a cold war, and it was, of course. if the conflict breaks out, it is total , so no one can evade, but now we live in a hybrid war here and

everyone was shot down deformed and guarantees, respectively, the curves we live with are no longer them with others. completely from the war and so on, therefore, it’s impossible to project purely like this . yes, even from the sixties , when intercontinental missiles appeared , even then the europeans began to doubt whether there will be automatic guarantees if soviet missiles fly in response and fly right there, therefore, if we see any visit the american president to europe always has a key phrase when they recall this article, that psychologically to assure allies they always blurt out nix there and so on and so on add this here. and how will it really be? thank you, we talked with oksana or korenko the last major mission. nato was an operation in afghanistan, it moved for 20 years and ended 2 years ago rather ingloriously, and the consequences of a report from islamabad. m

last year after the withdrawal of american troops millions of afghans tried to leave the country, although not everyone succeeded, and with the advent of the taliban, the situation of women in afghanistan deteriorated sharply; they were forbidden to leave their homes unaccompanied. but the main thing is to attend schools, colleges and universities. many were forced to leave their homeland in this tent city. mostly live more than three hundred people. i hope for help and a chance to go to a european country. sharif's apartment has four daughters in afghanistan , she worked as a teacher, but when the taliban came, they locked her daughters at home, and the school closed. i want my daughters to be

safe and educated. and then let them decide. whether they want to become a medical engineer or a teacher. i'm also worried about the women living in afghanistan, they want to leave, but all the embassies in the country are closed , they don't issue passports and people have no money , they can't just pray that they can get to a safe place. nargiz worked as a doctor for a long time. now she treats the sick in the camp. she has only first aid supplies and almost no medicines for her. in afghanistan, she saw danger everywhere and was afraid that her sons would be taken away from her and sent to her war. daughters were also banned from getting an education, so she had to leave the country. and for a year now, since she lives here, the tent came and the taliban became. very difficult. nobody is

safe. every time we went to work, we felt threatened, so i decided to leave the country and got to pakistan through a pinball. in the future i want to go where my children can be educated in afghan women there are very few opportunities for self-realization, but their talent and diligence are high. fatima does pencil sketches best of all, she succeeds in portraits, but the taliban say that in islam it is forbidden to draw people after the capture of kabul and did not occupy her school and strictly forbade students to come here. i was in my second year of university, but with the advent of my education ended. i sat at home doing nothing and began to draw, but then it wasn’t banned, or they would like us to live without any purpose. i didn't like it, that's why i came to islamabad. here we are not afraid to express ourselves hear our voice and give us here what we have the right to this tent city, it did not work out.