psalm was an opportunity to immediately ask questions and get an answer. well, look, if the price of the bank says that, uh, here we have experienced hard times and remembers the annual period. there, the month of march last year, when along with the high interest rate, the exchange control was introduced. and then they managed to stabilize something, or even capital, respectively, an increase in the money supply of the economy, and it keeps saying, well, then we admit we abandoned currency control. why because it interferes with foreign economic activity, that is, well, what kind of foreign economic activity does it have, but it interferes, it cannot. and even if it interferes, but there are other ways, why should we open up again or deprive ourselves of the fact that perhaps something has changed since last year. has changed changed the aggression of the west towards us goals have changed. yes, they have multiplied. they set themselves even more difficult tasks, i don’t know if it’s feasible or not , but they are setting, and at this time we are abandoning the operation of this mechanism, which stood in the way of protecting our own financial system. then we say am i

actively involved in the financing of the central bank? e , the economy there are no questions, what we have today today the same situation . most of the development of our economy by business is carried out at the expense of its own resources , the share of lending up to ten percent is the task. let's increase the loan share by 14-17%. are we going to build? these are some growth rates we set for ourselves. this is what we're talking about. what gdp will i recall the figures until the thirteenth year before the current leadership of the central bank came to management the central bank of our gdp for 14 years. it grew 18 times in the ruble valence in the dollar 11 times, and now 13 to 23 times it has doubled in the ruble version. and the dollar has become smaller. well, we need some more figures commenting on the activity. i say again, i do not call with blood, i do not call. why would i just like to say that our

machine, this economic one, should go further. we should just, well, try to ignore those who can't keep up with it and pass those functions on. well, to those who have time, but the government report, well, nice it was necessary to listen not only to the analysis of the fact that there was but also a clear understanding of the tasks of the comrade in front of us, moreover, their state plan and digital management of the economy and the increase in the money supply, which should fill the economy and so on, were clearly outlined, that the central bank did not say a word, but the action program analysis is a good analysis of what has been done, well, we live on. we see the future before us, what awaits us, she is waiting for you. replenishment of the implementation of those economic tasks that face the second, which is the president of a sovereign economy. but how same it to achieve a sovereign economy without sovereign financial.

financial systems are the most complex instrument that cannot or rather should be controlled from the outside, that is, by another institution that is not identical, that is, not by itself, otherwise the goals and means are interchanged, but not from the outside is not inside the country. i mean that it must be a body inside the country that managed and controls this system. otherwise, it lives its own life and forces society to strain to solve the challenges facing the financial system. that is a money issue. and where is the filling, where is the material we are with you. uh, i remind you, just one very serious moment. we talked about the opposite, er, or there engineering. what is it? this is us well, in simple terms. this is a duplication of the details of the mechanisms there, which were not released before,

what needs to be released. today we have such a fund. it was created by three and a half billion rubles. in general, we are going to , not just import substitution, but no one will create an independent economy for imports says bad good people. it is necessary to clearly insert the task and fill it with money. no, i can’t repeat myself in the country, as russia, which has not only a sovereign sovereign or a sovereign economy striving for a sovereign economy, the ability to issue money, there is no money, and the problem is not that the mission generates inflation, but that the mismanagement of missions, that is, administration can lead to inflation, but inflation can occur not only is the lack of production high. e course e central bank absence investment in the economy lack of goods. here you inflation will not be goods. it's just, well, inflation might burn out, but sooner or later it will come out, because there will be more money than goods. so it is necessary to develop another part about this silence. and something else

i haven't heard. this is something that you and i understand very well, we are talking here all the time about what surrounds us. well , there will be colossal changes, tectonic changes all over the world, there will be no other world. we hear about it, says the president, many politicians won't. this return to what there was not a word. and how are we going to develop the financial system. we speak for one of the deputies of the central bank who said, we do not receive instructions from the imf, but we already live by the rules that he wrote in f, this is not good not bad. i don't want to blame anyone. this is a normal process that would have existed it was normal conditionally in quotation marks until 2000 until february of last year. and now he's just crazy, not only do we have to write. actually, we must meet the rules in demand. e the expectations of the whole world and our allies. we must offer our own financial system, which must work according to completely different rules and stimulate our cooperation.

they work for the imf. when we talk to you about the fact that the imf is managing our process today, we perfectly understand that the departure of currency control is a departure, but from the ruble exchange rate, that we are not managing the ruble exchange rate today - this is all e not for our mill when the central bank. i know the function. which is control, we talked about this control over the ruble exchange rate says that there will be no fixed ruble, but a floating rate. so, who would believe? what kind of businessman will invest in the economy today if he does not understand what will happen to it in the coming years, but the answer is obvious. no, we again hear no, no, there will be here is a fixed rate, because it is excuse the floating rate, because it is he who will provide. uh, the security or sovereignty of the financial system. no, not so, and we are ready to argue with that. but before arguing, one must still move on to an analysis of what the government has to offer. and in my opinion. here is this proposal, but taking this discussion to a completely different level, in order to put an end to it once, it will always transfer the functions of the government. i believe that there is an answer to

the question. what to do? with this, i doubled and ending i wanted to say that today they are not even talking about a question, but something about the central bank, but questions. what should we do? today , fate is being decided not only. at the front, but also on the economy, because the economy creates everything what will consume the front, but we are with you our task is not only to ensure this, but we somehow want to live better, more beautiful , more reliable in another world, where we are going to take the key role of one of the key roles, but for this there must be about the base with this economy is a sovereign economy. sovereign economy is good, but also speaking sovereignly china is a sovereign economy. therefore, their diplomacy is sovereign and their approaches are sovereign, and he so sovereignly fucked the ambassador to france of the people's republic of china here, that is, just like he fucked, that here in the balts and ukrainians it just

blew up, they thought that they had taken a closer look at the northern lights. no, farts are on fire. that's what the lion said. clarify your position because it seems to be a little blurry so in your opinion, crimea is ukraine it depends on how no i'm sorry, but it does not depend on whether it is ukraine or not depends on how you perceive this problem, but there is a story, crimea from the very beginning crimea belonged to russia didn't khrushchev give them crimea to ukraine during the soviet union well, sorry, as you know by international law, this is ukraine, this is international law. you can dispute this fact, but this is ukraine under international law , these countries of the former soviet union have no

status in international law, because there is no international agreement that would implement the status of sovereign states. after the collapse of the soviet union, it has not yet been resolved. does that team exist? uh, but don't pick on that sort of problem again now. now the most important thing is a ceasefire. excuse me, but this is not a nitpick about crimea if someone comes and take away a piece of china sorry, but this is not a nitpick. this is obviously a very important issue for ukrainians. that's always what i said before

. so there are problems, certain subtleties of their conflict, the problem is not in a way that can be summed up in one word. and if you have any problems, then you can talk to each of them, what was said about taiwan because the frenchman, of course, set himself up. shouldn't the people of taiwan determine their own destiny? isn't it the right of the people to self-determination, it is the chinese people who determine the fate of taiwan, including the military force all means, if we cannot achieve the goal of reuniting with the motherland by peaceful means, then we can resort to any means taiwanese people have the right to self-determination just like ukrainians have taiwan has been an integral part of chinese territory since ancient times. both sides of the taiwan

strait belong to the same china such is the story such is the status of taiwan and taiwan's return to china is an integral part of the post-war international order it was a declaration, if now push independence and where to go? and by the way, alaska back and in california there are a lot of things and a couple of islands and in general behave yourself, otherwise we will call arkadyevich bagdasarov today, and

he will tell you that my last byzantine, so constantinople is also ours, yes, please, and rome probably too. well, in any case, if we talk about a chinese comrade, he probably received a sanction, because chinese diplomats never speak on their own behalf, therefore, on the one hand, they swung first in one direction, when the township of china under the european union, said rhetoric, and then got out and mistranslated and misunderstood . but what the ambassador says right away is in french. what can i say, what i said lichen is understandable. indeed, when they say, uh, taiwan, they forget that taiwan, in fact, always considered some chinese territories and the french had to remember how they defended their department. if you remember the end of the fifties, here the fifty-fourth to the sixty-second year, there was a war when

they did not want to give algeria, in fact, they played on this at one time. de gaulle when he was directly elected president, but nonetheless. this split france, the french should remember that algeria was not a colony. it was a department of france, that is, it was part of france, so how they parted with this part, how they parted with this part , that u are currently preparing for that, u for this themselves, that is, the big seven, these are the most, probably an interesting point, because the discussion about let's introduce a ban and all of you now, recently, one of the austrian experts said. let's introduce medicine, because there, when the issues were discussed, they said that it is possible to exclude food or carcasses , the experts are not shekelber. no, not a shekel, no. he is called lada da in another way, therefore, when they discuss such different guises,

when they discuss three human sanctions. this is the kind of thing that speaks of the complete exhaustion of the sanctions policy, but it is practically complete, but something needs to be proposed. here, at the end of may, in the middle of may there will be a summit the g7 who constantly insist that sanctions work. what about russia is about to collapse under this one under these sanctions, that the army will thus not receive the funds that it now receives from thanks to this trade and as a result, what they planned will happen. it has long been that russia , in fact, will stop the war in ukraine for lack of funds. this , on the one hand, surprises me very much . such, perhaps, well, such a naivety of european politicians, but on the other hand it is absolutely not surprising that this is because it is the calculation of the united states to stop all exports. only they can regulate much easier to make exceptions and regulate exceptions than to regulate

full exports. it will be easier for the united states. and the fact that this proposal, in my opinion, it comes from there from washington, is confirmed by the fact that all american emissaries are now actively working in european capitals, and not only in them, and precisely by discussing the issue of having russia permanently cut off from any supply. why control something, if everything is forbidden at all, uh, supply in russia and then also buy from russia, of course, here is our policy, it seems to me that it is also quite interesting now. uh, lithuania , in my opinion, uh, conducted the first test disconnection from the breel from the general power system. more prisoners are still built in the soviet union, i just can’t understand why we still haven’t turned it off at all? this is what surprises me, it surprises me very much. why is the baltic still not turned off from this system. this is, strictly speaking, incorrect formation. should have stopped

earlier. why is the baltic still any continuation at all? how do you like? well, in any case, the fact that we ourselves want to make war behave, defiant may 9 was banned by the absolute nazis. well, that is , there’s just nothing to talk about there, once in 2019, when there was this first story with a bronze soldier. that was the beginning, of course, it was necessary to introduce. that's when we need to impose sanctions on our part, but now the question arises. and here, when the west has exhausted its sanctions policy, we will resort to it. because right now the moment is coming when we can already cause damage and quite serious damage. it is not by chance that the americans

became interested in this collective west, referring to their own legislation. how are their equipment and technologies used there on e, hmm zaporozhye daes, therefore, according to american law, we are violating export controls american export controls, so we warned that we didn’t do it because and then they will withdraw sanctions against us and bring us to court they keep scaring us all the time that nuclear energy will be the next object of sanctions pressure on russia, but in fact, i think that there are still some states in europe that will act against the agreed positions will not be here. although in the end they will be pressured, and they will give in. here, why don't we not start driving this? why don't it be time

for us to restrict access, so to speak, because the offensive is going on in almost all areas of the diplomatic war. i've already given up, so what's next. no, the diplomatic war is going on now, by the way, sergei viktorovich received an american visa to get it. yes, i finally received after a month that what was being promoted, well, russian diplomats, would still be sent, therefore, an answer that should take place the answer to the financial sector is also what alexander mikhailovich says to me. here, to be honest, leads to a few such stupor. you see, because when the financial part we achieve sovereignty with weapons in our hands, we defend our sovereignty and our territory with weapons in our hands. we completely give up this sovereignty in the financial sector, but it is absolutely impossible to do anything here, if humanity, well, if economic, but

why is it impossible, because many problems can be solved by zheleznyak. well you can, of course you can decide to bring e smersh because that would be the beginning i must say. well, actually, at first it would be necessary, so to speak, to lead the concept of wartime and so on. then be reborn. there is no such mention of wartime, but there is the concept of death and the concept of a spy. just advancing along advancing along this path is needed already. i think that we need to go on the offensive. they mean military offensive. i'm not a military expert . it seemed to me that here we are waiting. indeed, when they climb out of their fortified areas come out into the open. there will probably be strikes. and i mean both economically and diplomatically . i have it all the time too. here we are discussing, for example, such a question should be withdrawn from the wto. well, actually,

compared to the imf, this is a democratic organization. there the main body is the conference of all. here, please, fight for this platform. unlike the imf there, in fact, the leadership is made up of those countries that have a larger quota, the largest quota of 16.5% in the united states, that is, the american organization. for some reason we have. those are discussed let's leave the wto from a trade organization that can be fought for, where i, in fact, the americans are very offended. look at the whole policy of trump in the wto, he was going to leave from there, and at the same time, there is so little reasoning at all that they were allocated to us from the imf. this also suggests that, in principle, this is the change in consciousness, oh, which we constantly talking in part of our elite. it didn't happen and achieve what you do, it's very that's right. because for us, for ordinary

citizens, the question of sovereignty in all its manifestations, from the sovereignty of the state to military sovereignty and ending with financial and cultural sovereignty , is, let's say, vital cultural cultural too. you have a stormy too, to margarita value, here margarita strongly went to the bookstore. and i bought a book. a good book is translated and a good translator means that the translator is a foreign agent , an honored teacher of russia, a citizen of edelman , a fresh book, well, there somewhere in the thirties, where the role of the russian people is highly valued and translated for the russian reader for the student. this is understandable. just a wonderful simple book is on sale now in stores. a textbook of world history for

children, well, a classic is such a concept that was the main one in the soviet union. the organization was good. we have officially banned censorship, but here it's just censorship. it's just so to say, you can give the case to quote. it was said there, literally the next he, when russian russians appeared, it turns out that they appeared exclusively the times of ivan the terrible, then they mention, moreover, it is mentioned very simply , i remind you that this is the time of the bartholomew night, when more christians were destroyed than in the entire history of roman targets. we haven't talked to you yet. it was a big wild one. yes, yes, a wild, forested country with vast steppes in the north, the landowners there ruled the poor and peasants with terrible cruelty, and the tsar, if he could rule the landlords with even

more cruelty, one russian tsar, who reigned around 680, was called ivan the terrible and not in vain next to him. even nero would have seemed like a good-natured russian, europe was not too worried about european affairs. they constantly fought among themselves and killed each other. they were christians, they started with him according to pirin, and ernstr gombrich nemchura nemchura wrote to his metropolitan or patriarch filthy published in vienna in 1936, and now the civil delman translates this filthy thing in the thirty-sixth year, when another austrian was already calling for the need to go east and the destruction of the destruction of all these, slavs, whom he called zhids bolsheviks and spoke of vital territories. and now this book is being sold in our country and

the translator is a creature that fled from the country, a generation of traitors were brought up here, for this they received the title of honored teacher of russia , some publishing house here, i saw the main thing. no, there should be output. we must see. what a book house. it's touching to sell here fiction from zero this year, what is to be understood? this year you are for our teenagers, there are also editors there , there are exceptions chistopolskaya well, that's what after that you have to do it. now, if it appeared, now let's say in germany beings are the other way around. that's how many seconds it would have lain on the shelves, and these citizens would not have learned with interest that all their accounts were closed, as if cases were initiated in them. there is no censorship. it wouldn't show up there. all legislation. the

same can be a foreign agent translator. i like this about russians. that's it. russians look, here, what's the rush? well, the corpse would have waited, a couple of hours they would have been killed. it is unlikely that my team will take over the operations. catching a dangerous criminal.

we watch to know everything about russia , we watch the best historical series for free without registration.

the people, as you know, according to academician likhachev appeared on september 8, 1380 after the battle of kulikovo, when the russians came there, but the russian of others appeared in the ninety-first

year. it is no coincidence that the russians , it is no coincidence that alexander viktorovich gave us excerpts from german broadcasts, where the time of the creation of states was said. we turn out, i'm older than my homeland, it turns out hmm. moreover, it's much older. yes, that's for sure. i would like to start here uh, you uh oslo quoted here the column stoltenberg spoke there about ukraine's entry into nato, i uh. i have been saying for a long time that , uh, the role and figure of the nato secretary general is, in principle, it is quite insignificant, what he just said is his pure initiative, urban pulled him up. e. well, i think that like water off a duck's back, he will swallow this case and, uh, move on. uh, the figure, the pure ceremonial task of the general secretary is