well, the russian people, according to sankevich and many others, appeared in the ninety-first year. it is no coincidence that the russians , it is no coincidence that alexander viktorovich gave us excerpts from german broadcasts, where the time of the creation of states was said. it turns out that i am older than my homeland. moreover, it turns out to be a much friend of the general center. and then you're older. yes, that's for sure. i would like to start here, uh, you uh, oslo was quoting here column stoltenberg spoke there about ukraine's entry into nato, uh. i've been saying for a long time that the role and figure of the general secretary, alone - in principle, it is quite insignificant, what he just said is his pure amateur performance, urban pulled him up. e. well, i think that like water off a duck's back, he will swallow this case and, uh, the figure will move on, the pure ceremonial task of the general secretary. he has a few tasks to say:

to hold a meeting of the atlantic council at all levels to prepare a budget. and voice uh, the decision made. well, and often, so to speak , to act as a translator of what the americans say with me. eh, by the way, up to a point there were such more such, uh , respect for this figure, but in 2005, the department of defense held a very large conference called, uh, the military against terrorism. the first conference was at the time, the second in moscow and the big one was 40400 more than 400. eh, people participated there e.g. nato ambassadors. well, this event was very difficult for us. i was responsible for the preparation of this conference. uh, minister of defense ivanov invited the general secretary general. e lord robins while what robinson's

its political weight. this is not stoltenberg. he was a respected person in the western community, and the americans listened to him , so when we made the protocol, so to speak, put a list. well, i had no doubt put the first one. uh, nato secretary general so the french ambassador threw me a tantrum almost in public. who is robins? who is the general secretary? this is the official that my government pays a salary to, i should come first. i am a representative of great france well, in general, i raged, i didn’t find a joke, therefore, with since then, my attitude to the words of the general secretary is quite such, you know , skeptical now a few words about uh, this meeting that took place in ramstein. you know with everyone, but we also had the eleventh meeting. well, first meetings, if you remember the published lists of figures. how many

shells will be placed? how many complexes are there? how many of that only the fifth tenth the last are very modest. well, take here's the eleventh. what decisions were made, well , they decided to create, uh, on the territory of poland, uh, there is a repair service center, tanks leopardo tanks, 2 it’s good to start training crews of abrams tanks here are 31 things that the americans promised by the end of the year. well now the truth they say is in the second half of the year. well, i think it will be by the end of the year. especially since the tanks are out of stock. they will still need to shoot something there. this is not an export option. so i think they won't be there until the end of the year. and the most important question. this is a question of air defense. because this is what , uh, what ukrainians are talking about all the time. and that's

really the way they talk about it all the time offensive, but in the offensive, in order to carry out a successful offensive, we need military air defense, namely military air defense. and what should ukraine take from ukraine now? what is mobile, but mostly mobile, well, stationary is the same, e, missiles for them, but the territory of ukraine is not produced, everything that could be shaken out of the eastern european allies was shaken out. well, this is western estimates for, at current consumption , about two to two and a half months. god , good system, the ukrainians had them before the start of a special military operation somewhere 65-70. uh, now, according to the western account, again, there are somewhere around 25-30 complexes left, and uh, yes, uh, for military air defense, it is preferable,

of course, to have caterpillar complexes, because the troops go not only along asphalt roads, sometimes also in fields , if you take this one, how do you say such dirt. unmeasured then, of course, wheeled vehicles. it’s just that e won’t work there, so everything that was set. uh, here are the americans and western europeans the same ace, t. e on sams. e patriot. uh, hokey, it was all supplied for covering stationary objects. this is not military air defense, that is. uh as a conclusion. it can be said that the west did not succeed in replacing, uh, the soviet systems, everything that they have and everything that they can then use as military air defense is a short- range system. these are the same osa strela

10. eh, these are stingers. uh, moreover, and on tracks only german egyptians and uh, british sides, an american woman is on wheels. that is, with the wax air defense of the ukrainians, uh, things are very, very and how will the western allies solve this issue, because there is no extra air defense system , it's not even a tank. this is an expensive complex, it is technologically difficult to produce them , uh, not a single day, not a single month. and maybe more than one year, so uh in this regard, how will they be, well, we can talk for a long time about the planned offensive, we are widely advertising, but uh, without uh, without uh, strong military air defense and in the absence of air superiority. i personally have little idea of ​​the success of this offensive. although of course, do not underestimate. uh,

and in conclusion, a few words about those teachings that began, er, on friday. this is the defender 23 two-month exercise. there are many tasks, there are operational compatible. strengthening the eastern flank, there we used the uh potential of the host countries to provide reinforcement troops, but the most important thing is to work out the strategic transfer of the united states reinforcement forces on the territory of europe. that is, i already spoke about this in this studio, that is reformer teaching is back in full and uh, everything goes to the fact that the americans will be restored to their grouping. uh, on the european theater will restore those headquarters. uh, the united , which were liquidated in the theaters , will restore, uh, two corps one, the corps they decided the fifth corps in poland will be

deployed headquarters and the seventh deployed, that is. uh, everything that was in the seventies hmm will return at a new qualitative level, and in the very near future to europe and we need to be on it. i'll say one more thing again, they haven't made a decision on the planes. i repeat my position that this will be the moment of truth, because they cannot be based on the territory of ukraine. they cannot have to be based on the territory of poland, hungary, poland, slovakia, or romania. and we will be forced to strike at these airfields. and then they will have to make very difficult decisions. whether to start a war with us, will it be a third world war or not? and ivan the terrible became formidable not according to our legend, that is, at this time it should be noted. with all the horror, they are oprichny. with everything else. you should always judge people by that. time in which they were and

act. it was at the same time that europe was flooded with blood, therefore , compared to what the european rulers were doing, ivan the terrible was by no means the terrible , but since then they had a romance. that is, of course, it was not grozny, it was necessary to add more. so to speak, terrible bloody stalin well, terrible cows have become no one wants to tell anything and how many millions he ruined in india remind me then it was the british empire they want to tell our houses doesn’t want to make a decision great britain

oh, it's impossible, of course, the goslingo-saxons rule about the americans, too, will not say anything. here some cretin , turning to me, after i turned to the ukrainian soldiers and said that solovyov needs to know more history, he does not understand that people are fighting for their land. says an american, in general, the wording of people fighting for their land is pronounced some kind of american moron. based on this, all americans should pack up and depart for their lands. leaving free indians in their place, in which they did not manage to do anything before to destroy the end these invaders talk about their land, turning to us, who returns their russian lands well , just really cretins, not only ignorant of history, but even more instructive through the lip. where

did they get so many morons from, after all, i know quite well, the americans lived there a lot and a lot of well-educated people. why do degenerates make their way through the classics all the time. it's like some kind of tricky path such an elevator for idiots to quickly grab you will lift you high. i don't know. these people you're talking about were just reading a book they bought in translation. they read it in the original on it, apparently, they were brought up, so ok , there were wonderful shots, and now our children also read it. here, too, a transformation in their head will begin. i’m just wondering, even what is the position of the translator. it is clear that the position of the publisher is interesting. why in 2023? our children's knowledge of world history should end in the thirty-sixth year.

what happened after 3:00 a.m. that so did not want our children to know what happened from the events? i understand the answer, what needs to be explained further. how are these citadels? democracy, freedom and human rights appeared in the fascist regimes, which were defeated thanks to the soviet union and i don’t want to talk about this. nothing can be written. something bad can please. e under the next article, so you can take the author who wrote before to say. well, i just translated it. he didn’t write anything on this topic after that, because in general the author himself after that is his only book on history. e such political history to go then he wrote only about history there is nothing more about the arts, therefore such an original choice of the author for the translation of an art historian to teach our children and the history of mankind. i would like to continue interesting statements in this regard. these days, in particular , the minister of defense of the federal republic of germany said that

if there is a territory of another country from which arms are supplied, then this is a completely legitimate right to take and strike at the territory of this country. he was talking about mm. this means that the blows that ukraine inflicts on the territory of russia, we are this question we have been discussing here for a year and asking a very simple question, if we know that deliveries are being made from the territory of poland, is it not our legitimate right to strike at least on supply lines, there and so on of all restrictions. he answered a reporter's question. he said that the civil object is not necessary. yes, what did he say, but he says, yes, we probably didn’t want to, but these are the conditions. not on russian territory, but for defense, which

does not matter according to international law defense can only take place on ukrainian territory, weapons were taken away in accordance with this, they were not allowed to pass. that is why ukraine has been asking for long-range and short-range missiles for 12 months. so it is not considered normal in such a military conflict that such a country also invades enemy territory, for example, to cut off supplies. this is the most normal thing in the world as long as civilian areas are not attacked. this has to be put up with, of necessity, not with joy, but it is a fact of life. i don't think that was the reason for the speech it says that the systems have been delivered. armament whether you like the red line or not? that is , you can also use civilians, but you have to put up with it, that is

, it’s unpleasant, but i don’t know german, i’m looking at the german translation here. me too, maybe we can, too, without joy, based on the fact of life in order to cut off strikes on the way, that means for those countries that still supply weapons to ukraine. hmm, the second thing that interested me in this interview, for nobody asked him about bombs that are banned by all the weirdos in the world. but he nevertheless decided to say that ukraine is asking for bombs, which are banned in all countries of the world, and the frg will come and say no to such requests. let me remind you that this phrase is from the creators of the phrase we cannot supply tanks to ukraine before that was a phrase. we cannot supply tanks and aircraft. now tanks. we can supply aircraft depends on who will be the pilots there. i think there is an aircraft issue, too, sooner or later. they were going to take this step. apparently mentally prepared. because the prohibited weapons will be supplied in

ukraine and in this regard. we just have to take this into account and you understand that there will be no borders in this e-conflict. absolutely. he, of course, said another amazing phrase. i'm still trying to comprehend it. until i got it in my head. he said that the doors of nato were opened for ukraine. it fills already with some intimate content, because it pinches. yes, yes, it is so powerful, the evolution from ukraine will be a member of this decides ukraine to the door is not open for ukraine , now the doors of nato are slightly opened, that is , some kind of not very positive prospect for the ukrainian state arises here and , uh, against this background. uh, direct presenters ask questions. he says, when he says, well , first ukraine needs to win, and then, and then we will have to think about it very well, that is. it is quite obvious that, in

fact, i think that we should take this positively, because one of the tasks of our special military operation is to ensure non-bloc status. e of ukraine neutral status, so that she doesn't have a nato membership. hmm, at least, and we 've been hearing for a month now that they are simply afraid to even say that yes, they say someday for sure. we will definitely accept, er, more such hysterical statements from the leadership of the european union in response to publications that have begun to appear there with some leaks about the fact that in general the majority of europeans. uh, with bewilderment, spain looks at the prospect of ukraine joining. e to the european union and the reasons are not only in budget and in that it is absolutely crushed in the economic plan of the state. it will simply need to be taken into balance, and the fact that at the same time it will be one of the largest countries in the european union

will have a huge quota. there , the european parliament will have a great influence on political decision-making. if we add to this that it will be a single center with poland. this is the end for germany and for the big old european states and ursuls inderlein to this he says an amazing phrase. she says geopolitically in the medium and long term. ukraine belongs to us, you will hear there, comrades who, for the sovereignty of ukraine, for the fact that it means to carry out colonization from russia, i have never heard that our european leader belongs to us. uh, the european official at the highest level is on fire that you are their property, and she is very happy about it. at the same time, she also says that most likely you will not be accepted into the european union as allies. what is a carrot before you so that you die

perish on us, causing harm to our country. why what can this one do there, says there is a membership, this is the strongest motivation for ukrainians. that is, it is simply a means of forcing them to go to the battlefield. uh, commit terrorist acts on the territory of our country and do everything in order to hmm restrain russia . for nothing else, neither ukraine nor other soviet countries are needed by the west at all. well, there is no interest in what to improve the quality of life there to build, there is reality institutions are more effective, as soon as their henchmen come to power, they don’t care at all. is there an independent judiciary there or not? how is the economy developing there? how is it with free human rights? the only thing they care about? what damage? specifically, this republic can carry russia's positions in the region, nothing else. and finally. here's what we discussed. here, uh

, the ambassador of the people 's republic of china went to france and this interview is really, it seems to me, very a serious event, because it’s not just the chinese ambassador, it’s the chinese ambassador to france, and this interview takes place after the macron’s visit to china, and of course, the chinese ambassador didn’t talk about strange things, you know, there are historical russian crimea, so this is a difficult question . we must discuss it. he said that the issue of the sovereignty of the republic after the collapse of the soviet union is very controversial, which, in principle, is international law. you are the basis for uh, so, uh, the consolidation of this sovereignty is also still missing in his ideas. pronounced. this is a very specific phrase. these are extraordinary phrases. one might say radical. in the sense there is means revolutionary and they are pronounced in french. china television in france after the macron's visit to china and

they are pronounced in a couple of statements, one gets the impression. maybe it is, of course , erroneous, but it seems to me, well, it is directly clear that there are already some ideas that there is a territory of the post-soviet countries, this territory of interests in russia and the chinese finally recognize and will bring under this, including the international legal framework. there is the territory of taiwan - this is the territory of china, and this is very clearly stated by mr. macron. what is the role of the macron or is there france on the territory of europe after that? this is a big question, but it was not raised here. we have not heard this yet, but those shifts and those changes that are taking place on the territory of europe are actually tectonic and should not be underestimated now. generally interesting, he said that what height was under the soviet union and said, i want more

say. here is an important thing, after he was looking for the ambassador of ukraine in france, he said the following: he is there, the question about crimea is the main indicator. so, in whose direction the person supports. and i want to say the following: the soviet empire is no more, and history is moving forward. so what about the soviet empire. no, this is just the best indicator. oh, why the crimea has nothing to do with you as well as the territory. well , if you were there, you would be nostalgic for these 30 years of the soviet union and you would say what a beautiful country everything that we have here was gave. for 30 years, these countries have been fighting this soviet legacy and a huge part of this soviet legacy for us. these are all these territories that were part of your state. you didn't want the soviet union , it's gone, please sign it. enjoy life. in these new conditions, because all this is a consequence of the policy of the soviet union

, nothing more, yesterday was the birthday, by the way, the founders of ukraine, yes, yes , because, well, ukraine in general too - this is the soviet heritage, there was no such state invented by vladimir ilychniki, the founders demolished. i don't know why the chinese went didn't say that. the whole world has always recognized one, china and the united states, the question was, where is the capital of china? for the first 20-odd years, they believed that she was in taipi, and then they said no, she was in beijing, but the very meaning is that china is one, no one is ever against it didn't mind. moreover, regardless of whether a single china, if the communists of the country are in power, does not

depend on political power. therefore, the question of a united china in general is beyond doubt, it cannot be. it never existed. and no one then raised this issue. he is here plays no role. always and expansion is necessary they are more italians than french. and the french abbasci speak bass there as well as the san sebasian in spain what is it? strasbourg is a german

city it's not in germany it's in france but it's a german city it's not a french city. and lorraine is german territory, not french. she's not in germany but she's german and away we go. and no one asked where you want to be. nobody asked in strasbourg where do you want to be? then there was no right to determine, well, they are germans. always there were germans today. so the french are already silent, and they demonstrated their international political state thinking when they created this androgenicity capable of tearing off territory from the series or in order to fall into the catholics of the french direction was their own state. when they are a minority there and scored everything that could be scored and the whole world the whole middle east is shaking from the fact that

they tried to create a lebanon that has no basis either historical or ethnic non-religious before such a year catholics who profess catholicism exactly as it is in france and now they are trying to interfere with someone at all somewhere. i am calm about algeria and everything has already happened. but about all these statements that were. american

they were on the shores of the sea of ​​azov. now they have a problem to get to the dig, but then they didn’t have it. and what prevented them from 200,000, oh, to concentrate a thousand tanks. missile attacks plus missile boats and forward. or maybe they blew it up the same way they blew it up. and russia would have to spit blood and would it be possible then to stand in the crimea or not? i don't know. so what's the significance of what started this operation when a lot more than anyone could fucking imagine. the first

strategic direction was a land passage to the crimea in order to escape. security, crimea this is the eighth base of the black sea fleet. otherwise, no, because they don't want to stop in ukraine, nato should include ukraine moldova within the framework of romania , without the framework of romania, it doesn't matter, georgia armenia is their strategic plan. they are now pushing georgia to open a second front. a

does anyone other than the military know what it means? december 2021 deliver nuclear weapons to the baltic states. we will accept everyone else into nato in ukraine, and how did you say it right? we still see troops in the game. so, you have to start from that.

there is no other way out in russia. hope, for everything else they are completely unfounded.