and it would seem to be self-evident, what a completely different approach we have now, we need to suppress inflation and completely, without embarrassment. they explain to us that suppressing inflation, including measures leading to the impoverishment of the population and a decrease in economic activity. the most important thing is to reduce inflation. and then everything will flourish by itself and it will boom, this is a slightly different strategy that allows for modernization. in doing so, we see that last year. we had a fairly significant increase in costs, you know, of course, you can not believe the official statistics in the field of inflation, that is, the dynamics of inflation. obvious the insane growth of budget spending last year is accompanied by a decrease in inflation. why because an increase in the money supply leads to an increase? prices only when the money supply is enough, when the money supply is not enough, yes 48%. uh, as we have now without ruble assets. in this

situation, an increase in the money supply leads to the fact that business activity accelerates faster than once, and an increase in product supply and services. it outstrips the growth money supply, as a result, prices do not rise or fall even if one does not pay attention to one's own version of monopoly policy. a simple thing, our constitution guarantees the citizens of russia the right to life, the economic expression, the right to life, is a guaranteed subsistence level, on which you can only live on the national wealth fund, unless of course you believe in the ministry of finance, and i believe them on april 1, 11.9 trillion rubles and more a certain amount of trillions of rubles in absolutely liquid form lies on the so-called budget deposits. colleagues, if you guarantee the citizens of russia a living wage. this will greatly boost economic growth. this will spur economic development. this will convince people

that their state is not an enemy, which we hear from all the stands. it's not well , at least i hear from one. this is an unacceptable dependency, the same thing under the weight of which the great mighty soviet union collapsed. they understand subordination, a guaranteed living wage, but we have the topic of a guaranteed living wage floats pops up serious each time , by the way, causes disputes not only for us, but also for many other places in switzerland for one simple reason, in general, i was always surprised by the wording of the right to life. because no one has yet left life alive, so the right to life can not be realized. well, everyone dies. that is, here it is simply for us then to very clearly define what we call that is. well, for one, that is, what kind of guarantees, that is, this is the minimum level of wages, that is, the excess of the consumer basket there. just right here i really want to be specific, that

is, what we are now including in this understanding is the consumer basket, on which one can physiologically exist. as we know, it is very low, because, as the experience of wars has shown , it is terrible, if it starts from physiological needs, then we will drive people into terrible poverty. well, they really say, because there's just a little bit of grain and water, and a man lives long enough. that is, we can't take their cholesterol. yes, we can't do that, that's why we just said yes, that we have a minimum income there should not be lower than the subsistence level. that is , it's just that the cost of living must be calculated correctly correctly. quite right. and this work was carried out a long time ago it was carried out in the hated, including. for this in the soviet union how many trace elements are needed how much should there be buckwheat? how much milk should there be? yes, this is again on modern terms. this also does not work, but now they will give you synthetics then from worms. if

you deprive people of the right to life, it's not true, does not deprive anything. we have any substantive question. can you throw away the details? no, well, it's just fundamentally important, because what we call. this is a seriously big question that humanity cannot solve for itself, because the cost of living in syria is the cost of living in america is the cost of living. in japan, lived at least in germany, these are completely different values, even in calories. yes, even in calories, of course, there is a million aspect, so in order to decide it is really necessary to this is taken very seriously, for example, the modern living wage should include attendance at cultural events. reading books communication communication, that is, access to the internet clothing, that is, here these are not idle questions, because when we descend at the level of physiology, and we will lose a person. as such, you know, if we deprive people of the opportunity to live, then we lose them physically, and not morally.

what does it mean metaphorically, means the opportunity to live, this is a lawyer. well, we were depriving people of the opportunity to live. let's ban motor transport, because then we will not decide the possibility of living for those people who die on the roads. that is, you, that is, behind these wordings of living legislation, do you know what soviet standards should be done if we apply now? yes, people will die. well, yesterday i received a pension letter about soviet standards, it costs 11,900 quarters, eight medicines, seven hundred, the correct terms, we begin to look everywhere. we have a pension, when the subsistence level in the region they are paid additional pension for 30% of the service in us. this is valid in all regions deputed for 30% below a little bit. as deputies, you are well aware of the second point. if he has a rent higher than his income, then he writes an application and reduces it. third. these are all these stories,

passed millions of times, which means that this person is either hiding something or not working with local authorities. it's always hidden here. i consider millions of such cases, and when you start looking , it turns out no, well, i still have the truth there. here i pay a little income from rent, because in fact in fact, i have a five-room apartment left there, therefore, in which case it is necessary to look specifically exactly right. in january of this year, according to official statistics, the number of divorces in our country exceeded the number of cancers. true, february has to do with the right to life, but it’s very simple, because when people look at how their parents tear what their grandfather is and when people move into a person, in which, in general, for two, unless, of course, use the standards of the thirties and the complex topic of the place, then it becomes difficult for them to live. and when they have brains were not enough, do not marry. forgive

me, please, when people who were forced to take the unified state examination and passed through our education system cannot be made claims to the intellectual level. that is , it turns out that people are idiots, so you need to look for a minute. that is, you think that they are idiots, because they did not study well, it is impossible to make claims against them. no, they studied and it is necessary to give out apartments, idiots, but now you will not get divorced, because you do not live in a person in apartments. but you are idiots that you didn’t teach well at school, you don’t have brains, but it’s not yours, it’s your fault that you are idiots, here’s an apartment for you. live in them idiots and do not get divorced and the income is still cool. yes, it's still there. income you idiots can't work. now you have wonderfully shown that the right of a person to the life of the russian federation and three hours of human rights, what if you got married? is the apartment lags, is it the right to the object? no no, i said living wage living wage. i'm asking.

determine what is included. you speak site relax and read, i can read all the insights, but you know we have a large number of divorces, because we have a living wage, or what? not including, therefore, and my mother taught me. you just can't provide for your wife, don't get married be responsible for what you're doing, well , responsibility can't be higher than the cost of living. that is, when we start talking specifically, it arises from it, but in china in general for a long time there was no such concept of a pension for a long time. name, when there were already pensions in china, we liberals it was said that pensions are extremely harmful to economic growth. look, this is developing and the americans and everything else. retirement is always not a question at all. this is not the category that helps or does not help

development. it's all different. these are the critics. gothic, program there karl mars 2005 1775. honest consumption funds. it all comes from there, when society has a certain obligation and the dacha is developing. that is, this is the whole topic, which is a little secret. bismarck led pensions strongly after the criticism of the lord yes, but it was clearly not in development. this was justified, of course, clearly the development of people by karl marx, they were in the unified scientific german field, therefore they were divided, who walked. that is why they arose. i'll tell you even more money that the secret of soviet development, in particular the economic one, was based on german. at the beginning of the 20th century, as you well know, about whom we later monetized on the works of mendeleev , first of all, dmitry ivanovich mendeleev , before the non-branch balance worked, was not only a master of cortonage, but we love him not for this for 40% vodka solution

96%. someone loves for furry. balance. someone sees beyond 40%. you can love to beat, you can love dmitry too, uh, mendeleev wanted to say medvedev yes, well, dmitry is also carrying him, then somewhere there will be anatolyevich, of course. eventually. yes, this mendeleev was different. here is his favorite not only for this one. old martyrs like the old marxist like that. here, tell me even now these speeches of this crazy professor of french, really, who are they from where do they get about various. culturally, yes, we talk about it a lot, excuse me a little. i sat down in a bunch a lot today, but i'm all right. and in short, about differences in cultural, civilizational, even religious ones. well, to be honest, i think that all this needs construction, of course, in general

, in the end, everything is ruled, as napoleon said the same thing, in principle, in other words , marx said more scientifically and all these differences they resort to when necessary justify this or that action people, approximately the same on really. everywhere they equally feel about the same emotions, which, by the way, is clearly visible in my world of cinema, because, to be honest, i have shown my films abroad many times, for example. they went here in russia, to be honest, i didn’t see any difference, they perceive everything the same, whether in india, in arab muslim countries, or in europe . well, in any case , in my understanding, the main interest is to cut off

russia from europe and it is very specific. and as he said, again, our friend vladimir ilyich lenin to whom it is if you do not recognize the class struggle, the existence of the class struggle, you will never understand the true reasons for the movement of history. here it is all obvious that the americans needed to cut russia off from europe, what should they say? happily done. generally. in general, they did. why it was necessary to do this in the order of reasons , the order of their own, so to speak, economic difficulties, and according to the second, in my opinion the last after the collapse of the ussr, russia, with the help of its pipelines, really surprisingly deeply entered the economic life of europe and, in principle, hmm, i think 10 20 years is enough. she could have done even more. and in

my opinion, the americans were in a dilemma to lose europe altogether, so there is nothing here , no chimera here. no, these are all values , that's all right, and most importantly, that's exactly what they did, by the way, uh, i naturally agree with sergei vladimirovich that this is a civilizational struggle. yes, more on that later. i’ll say more, but as for the civilizational challenge , of course, but about that, by the way, how much the americans themselves in their plans include what the estonians and poles dream of destroying russia, so to speak, i’m not . by the way, i’m not quite sure. so i'm not quite sure what it is for them. at this stage , russia needs to be cut off from and from europe, from this market , thrown there to asia, but strictly speaking, so logically, but i apologize for the expression. what the hell country to plunge into chaos, if

it possesses me on ice cream, why is it necessary? that is, such characters as the estonian mister polish defense there is this dudy, but they don’t think about it, because everything is there, as they say. there, just the laws of marx and napoleon, emotions do not work there. there it is, and the americans are quite pragmatic, therefore , uh, it is quite possible that they do not set themselves the task of completely immersing russia . this is unprofitable for them, because it can lead to a real disaster. this is such a country, disintegrated into pieces with nuclear weapons. it doesn't go away very well. but this does not mean that i am justifying the americans. and that i uh don't consider this situation less complicated and dangerous for us, because whatever it was that they cut us off from the european

. , but uh, but, but nonetheless. i think that all the same, you still need to understand that the seriousness of this and this blow is for us, but i would pay attention. that's really the speech of the chinese ambassador in france who said about that general status. uh, as they say, the state of the remaining after the collapse of the ussr is not clear because it was attacked there, as they say , all european, first of all, of course, it was added, you and so on, although in essence he said what is really because it's really not clear, since the very fact of the said agreement was legally absolutely ridiculous. he did not have , by and large, no legal at all

, at least no legal norms were observed; three republics gathered and for some reason, the ussr was dissolved without the participation without the participation of other republics without the participation of the president of the soviet union, and how is it really after that? by the way, as far as i remember, the bialowieza agreements have not been verified by our parliament of our duma , that is, in this sense, chinese e, diplomas back that the boys are all back. well, that's another question. what can i be sure that our leadership will probably keep silent about this and do the right thing, because. this is a question that is connected not only with the baltic republics with other republics, with which we have, in general, complex, but still allied relations. it might stress other republics it doesn't need to, but i mean it's a staging in itself. it's just

that it's actually quite legitimate, and it certainly is so in relation to ukraine, so uh, there can be no doubts here. well, for me anyway, i have always believed that the bialowieza agreements. this is, uh, absolutely voluntarism and and. b. in general, by and large , a crime, even regardless of whether broke up. well, how did you do it. how it was done, and it was done as a result to the detriment of the russian federation in everything in everything. that is, if this had been done in a more civilized manner, it would have been possible for the russian federation to emerge from this collapse on a completely different side, along with crimea, along with , by the way, donbass, quite possibly, along with a corridor to kaliningrad, along with bases in tallinn and a jewess, to go and in this case, these republics would not be in nato, that is, with a completely different result. could be

even if, as they say, the republics have agreed that we will now live separately. here is the main thing. in my opinion, the crime of those who created and signed these agreements. in general, in my opinion, someday you still have to give a correct assessment of everything here. and i have been calling for this for a long time. yes, it is necessary now e returning, yes to the glory of sergei vladilenovich, indeed a challenge to civilization. yes, it is, it is, indeed. we stand. this is increasingly turning into a patriotic war. more and more this is present and we must to understand, uh, everything, the responsibility that and the threat that we face. well in that sense, well right. here dmitry agrees when he says that this is it, but in your program yesterday, by the way, your wonderful program was very interesting, but again i drew attention to

the performance of margari. that simonian here, well , why is it necessary to publish a german book from the time of the second rakh of the third reich yes, the thirty- sixth year, but russian history. well, why is this for and is it directed to children for russian children, in general is this what is this is it brandy? this is already moreover, we still have to look, in general, if i were in the place of the state duma from time to time. i understand they have a lot of work to do. well, from time to time i did some investigations. here, so to speak, my friend nikita sergeevich mikhalkov always raises a very serious question. he is an honored person, who is our outstanding master, who is with great authority all the time in every program. well, as is customary, by the way, in this sense, maybe the americans there will conduct some kind of investigation, here it is posed a question. here margarita simonyana

put on go through the investigation. like it's a book. why was it and was it even published at the expense of state money ? uh, on the one hand, we are talking about the challenge on the other hand, and on the other hand, we publish the civilizational one. and how many of them are there in the book? go to the bookstore guys, i go all the time, you can't find anything there. oh yes, what is there find. i must say 70% anti-russian. she is 20%, just purely russofian, and that's it. they publish it and that's it. it is, as they say. we have on the shelves and all the time the question. and what is it? is it really so economically profitable that all this is there, there, it seems that the circulation is not large. yes, there are 3,000 copies, then two thousand. well, this, well, this is all going this all this. well, in this sense,

apparently, there should still be some kind of specific policy. by the way, i don’t even call for censorship, but i call for it to be in the administration president to create some kind of body that at least. well, somehow this case was tracked. why in the administration, because our country is vertical. you know. as they say, now, if it comes from there from above , yes, but they will tell me that this is a repetition there, like, like a socoparte. well, what did tsoko arise because it was a necessity, because from the central committee of the party it was accepted where everything was from everywhere to another, sort of, like, uh, it wasn’t really accepted. well, we have such a device. we spoke imperial in general in essence devices, so some work must be done in this sense, because it happens, uh, all the time and in this sense.

by the way, i'm talking about cyclo parties. i'm thinking, and they have it connected, look how clearly it is tracked. everything is tracked. everything is absolutely everything, by the way, cultural events, nothing, according to the words, you are not friends, as countries are forbidden to participate. in any actions where there is at least some presence of russian culture, at least some presence. this is a setup. this is the setup. it's not easy. ok then. a who gives this setup? so there is an organ. i suspect that there is some kind of commission visiting the parliament that monitors all this, because it must be admitted that they act very consistently, very rationally, they do not miss any trifles. well, behind this, so there is some kind

of organization. somehow it's all cardinated from somewhere. well, apparently coordinated. this can only be done from the territory of our main enemy, the united states. and there it can be coordinated, apparently, only from the state department. we don't know all structure. we don't know everything that's going on there. we do not know all the nuances, there are many things. they turn on and as if no one knows about it, they work in this sense. we need to be, of course, much more organized in order to do this. the civilizational challenge, as sergey vladilenovich e formulated absolutely justice, cannot be lost, because this is a serious challenge. for us, this is serious. we we must say. in my opinion, after all, this year really showed that we are an amazingly survivable people and amazingly the country is surviving. it's really. so this, of course, is the merit of the president's government.

that's right, but we don't need to throw our hats on there , because the struggle has just begun, of course, this is not this, this is not even not this one, not the climax. it's also such a prelude, it's an orchestra. the curtain hasn't opened yet. this is a debut. this is it at swivel debut. yes, i believe this should be understood by those who, of course, will say upset, well, how is life, in general, it consists of this, it seems in my life. i will say. now i understand better. e time it was the fifties sixties seventies. that's 30 years old. they were actually people, amazing. they lived in a calm, surprisingly safe country, as they say, it’s understandable, there weren’t jeans there, there the hell with them. forgive me, lord, but this was the merit of my father's generation. which defeated europe in the forty-fifth year

and gave us the opportunity to develop for 30 years really in a state of complete feeling that it will always be, there was such a feeling that it will always be. we will always be in imagine at that time that we would seriously think that the poles might attack us. it may be a big challenge for us, but it was funny. it was just ridiculous. this is a soviet man. there some there the seventieth year. you just wouldn’t understand at all how the french germans are also americans, yes, i’m talking about the latter, you need to set yourself the task, of course, to wear some kind of serious. defeat to our main geopolitical rival, if we do not set such a task, because to win you can't just sit on the defensive all the time. here is the last tour sergei viktorovich showed in general, well, in any case , it seemed to me, maybe i'm mistaken myself

, their vulnerable place is the continent. that's where you have to strive. by the way, without saying, i think that the modern current here is what is called the cold war hybrid according to me. it will take place without nuclear strikes. this is a war of gestures and small conflicts over this. well, in principle , on that territory, this is a big vulnerability for them. do you remember 200 years in the united states, the biggest panic was when there was a cuban missile crisis. it was the most serious blow, even the second world war did not cause this and the war. with japan , it did not cause this. e such a result as the caribbean crisis, by the way, i must say, e, it has been customary for us since the time, there the sixties of the soviet half-desent consider this defeat. it was the victory of the soviet union and we must pay tribute to the hook

won then, because he achieved those goals that the americans removed their bases from turkey and this was the result of this. well, in this sense, but we, of course, cannot do this today without the participation of our chinese comrades. this is possible only if our alliance with china is still more definite and china nevertheless clearly chooses for itself and understands the need to somehow participate in this struggle more concretely. cunning

eren shakhnazarov i need help four. are you going to jump?

dmitry what can we do on their continent , to be honest, i don't know what the chinese can do there. i, too, you weakly myself. on in fact, i imagine the whole thing is that there is a conflict in the very zone that at one time painted there , it goes on from the very moment as soon as they whip there that the western hemisphere belongs to the united states. they have their own internal conflict, it is always much more complex and intense. than any people who tried to interfere there, including us, who were there in the early years of soviet power of the soviet union there in the thirties we were supported by many people in the united