and what dmitry said about clinton is the same. janet repeated yesterday and i'm sorry janet led the fed, they don't take fools there, as you know. yes, janet also said that we will lose leadership if we don’t definitely upgrade our house now. do you remember that the debt began to grow when the united states just began to struggle to start taking on strong money debt. our leadership will grow. no, it's interesting such tracts. the fact is that the point is that the payment of debts. long dresses only

cowards to all who for a long time one of the foundations of the british empire constant payment of debts, from whom they always borrowed money in the nineteenth century, they always had money from the english, usually everyone else is yours, how would i politely tell you about they spoke, so for the united states that's what they say now, in my opinion. this is quite important, because, again, i repeat on the power that is now the us m, what difference does it make what debt there are no pockets in the coffin. well, if the world is on the verge of a nuclear catastrophe, what difference does it make what it was well done, beloved about the statements of american about the statements of american european politicians about

the need to assassinate putin, the elimination of putin, and so on and so forth. uh, first of all, it looks like a tantrum. yes, it was not possible to fill up the russian economy there in 2-3 months. this means that putin's attempt failed to contain military victories for some wide ones established there, so to speak, yes, it means that only the attempt on putin remains, in general, in some places, as it were, a historical reaction. it's the first second really, they understand or not, but here is such a massive attack on appeals to the russians. they only increase the rating. putin yes, maybe, so to speak putin there are questions. there are some mean bewilderment out there about what happens sometimes, but really all of this bewilderment. they just do not relate to what walks. uh, what's going on there in relations with the west and so on because we are not acting decisively enough, according to many people, about the tactical bucket strike. that's what i want to tell american politicians. actually the case of american politics is a huge

amount. uh, the russians just want the issue to be resolved radically and quickly , no matter what they have to do. that's what the russians want. yes , it didn’t work out neatly, it means inaccurately, but definitely definitely quickly and very hard , in fact, just this marking time is somehow incomprehensible, so to speak. e maneuvers are some waste steps voluntarily. this is what causes irritation of bewilderment and misunderstanding. this is what is unclear. so to speak, loyalty. e to the leaders on the ukrainian state is incomprehensible softness with regard to visits to kiev by these same european american politicians. so this does not cause understanding, irritation, but not at all a desire to go there quickly. everything let 's make peace and now you will again be like under gorbachev or yeltsin. uh, so this is the brightest future, so just when uh , so to speak, american or european politicians. that's how tough, uh, they indirectly threaten putin themselves, maybe

not wanting, uh, they increase his ratings, because in fact, in the history of russia and like many other countries, a leader who was popular with the leaders of the warring countries never enjoyed confidence. that 's actually and that's all, and in fact, we have trust, for example, to the same perestroika leaders gorbachev fell apart, including on their swan and in front of the west. now, as they remember, for example, gorbachev and yeltsin , those who were so loved in this very america and europe, here in the country, and they are also remembered as traitors, as traitors who betrayed the national interests of russia, so that americans like europeans, and so on and so forth, so when they start, so to speak, such a massive company. yes, even with threats. yes, they want, they don't want, uh, but in fact they support putin's ratings and i say it again, on the contrary, a huge number of people here are perplexed about the lack of rigidity or indecision about wanting. yes, maybe a speedy end to

the conflict. yes, but with the use of all available means. that's what causes people, as it were, yes, they understand the annoyance confusion and so on. why do these faggots go there, as it were, from this one from europe , why, so to speak, they let all sorts of incomprehensible people go there, and they pretend that we can’t get them and can’t do anything. after all, it is obvious that with this some kind of game , you don’t understand this game. and it’s not at all something else i don’t understand, they say the americans. we held a review in odessa and are accepting data. why wasn't everyone destroyed? well, yes, and why at this moment we are you we americans are checking about this the essence should be no way to say the bridge, for example, among a huge number of russians, among other things, raises questions and misunderstandings, maybe simply because we lack qualifications, for example. the same grain deal. i understand, of course, that we are, as it were, supported. well, i mean, we maintain good relations with the current government. uh, it means

specifically with erdogan and, of course, personal relations between vladimir putin and recep tayyip erdogan. this is an important argument. this is really a serious big capital, but, but moreover, it must be understood that if uh, and i understand that putin, as it were, wants erdogan to win the elections, which will be very soon, but we must understand for ourselves in advance that if erdogan is not a trade election, this is not a disaster for us, and we will deal with these issues. if we ourselves do not put ourselves, like, victims, as we often do in current situations. yes , we do have some opportunities. uh , maybe we'll lose, well , we'll gain some, for example, we won't be held hostage to this very strange grain deal, which is pretty much. yes works for the interests of turkey, in particular , mr. recep taip erdogan. this is absolutely obvious. yes, we still haven’t fucked anything with her, or at least we don’t know what we ate, but he tries pain and blows. no, there is no such unequivocal dependence on russia from turkey, this dependence

is mutual, as there are a huge number of interests concerning both the russian markets and russian gas and energy. they still don’t do anything for us, but in fact, how would we for many years become constantly in the position of the turks who suffered restrictions in advance supply weapons, yes, ukraine is a little bit unambiguous. everyone in crimea, and they are actually radical and have supported and continue to support quite a few radicals, therefore, this position , when we seem to have already suffered in advance, it narrows the field for maneuver, this should not be, therefore, as it will be, it will be and the last completing. this, among other things, is one of the problems that i have spoken about many times in the post-soviet space; many of the problems that we now have are the result of a whole complex, so to speak , of all sorts of different difficulties, but including the fact that all these years we have been putting ourselves in the position of those who supposedly, uh, no one owes anything, but we owe everyone we owe everyone this is

the question that you said at a time when hundreds of thousands of russian peasants are fighting on front, for the motherland, diasporas are created here , a state within a state. it begins to dictate its own conditions, and they are not touched, they also begin to reason. you know, it will be, uh, interethnic stability is threatened by diasporas that are transforming. community controlled, here they are threatened threaten lack of equality of all before the laws of ethnic organized crime groups here they are threatening, because they actually support nursophobia. they provoke, uh, potential instability. and there is no need to tell each other what we really loved to do, because everything is different with us, nothing is different with us. come on, now we are already in a situation where we see how many of our spells from past years are myths, they have now backfired on us. we don’t have everything so we don’t have everything in a special way we analyze a number of problems, with which we can't handle. it will be the same with this problem, do not lull

yourself into talking about the fact that we have some kind of special, so to speak, special atmosphere and we will not have the same. this is exactly what will happen there in europe, and it will already happen , and the same, by the way, also applies to passenger states, for example, the middle one here in transcaucasia. here, for example, uh, it means that these migrants, taking away jobs, including those from their own citizens, filled the whole country. if anything, in a different way it is forbidden. listen, migrants. here to a question on schemes it is not necessary to find the scheme. here vladimir will not let, so to speak, deceive. here in this studio. i have said many times in the past year that migrants are a very effective instrument of political pressure with the help of migrants. we can change political regimes overnight in these countries, but we do not touch them like a sacred cow. why ah on them someone earns? ah, you can see we will be offended, these are the talks about the fact that she will be offended by us, and we cannot move sharply, they are significant degrees and led to many, the difficulties that we are now facing, and i will ask such a simple question. we have many people

from central asia who have received russian citizenship. and how many of them were among the partially implemented? and how many of them were on military registration, and how many of them went to volunteers and how did they even get it? this citizenship, for example, some. i know a brilliant and tajik two brothers, a hero lost one leg, but this is a unit. and you can see the statistics, just see and ask question and how did you get citizenship and what to do to collect? by the way, the president has just arrived at the same industrial park, which is mentioned in the bild in particular. so the plans of our president do not depend on the western press and do not depend on the various edomas of the minister of defense, by the way, this moment is in india so that everything goes according to plan

according to our plan, i’m talking, well, first of all, give in to cheap provocations, constant ukrainian propaganda, which constantly repeat the supply of israeli weapons to ukraine until now. all this turned out to be false. the assumption that they put how much this weapon is, then you can threaten. so are you going to

negotiate with them? this is the same set of international criminal criminals. the dishonor of dishonesty is that half of them have no brains and no mind. well, this is just a sucker, okay, but with the same people there is nothing to talk about with them , it is impossible to negotiate. and there is nothing to negotiate with them. and i want to note what i said, this is an old fool. there were two points worth paying attention to, that is domestic to domestic market and against the republican party. it's quite clear. this internal disassembly is that it escalates inward the political strife in the united states, and there were several things that reflect the politics of the vision of american bones. the second she said is also

a classic phrase. she also reflects what she says, we have an obligation to maintain our hegemony, so that other countries continue, as the philippines provides its territory, for our military bases with the americans want to increase their military bases. the philippines is and this must be treated absolutely seriously. such is the american policy. such is its policy, which it reflected and carried out. well, remember how stupid this is. one of the reasons for her defeat in the elections is that she

simply did not perceive the american people. purely physically well, this is purely such western western morality, such peacefulness of compassion is christian in its interpretation, but it’s not worth taking seriously what they say in general, and although paying attention to what, how and what, i want to say a few words regarding korea a why american cargo talking about nuclear?

why because in many countries? the japanese cannot bear that both koreas have if i keep it already. and then the degree of influence or influence of the united states on these countries will drop sharply. then they themselves such

already up to now no one has yet attacked strangeness with nuclear weapons. even if the neighboring country had such, only one country attacked the country with nuclear weapons, attacked the nuclear role of a country without a nuclear thieves , this explains it. what if tomorrow? china's leader will say

they don't understand what they're playing to everyone let's answer, symmetrically, like america who said that now now i'm just so that the viewer does not have to stoop. you haven't heard what i want to say, i'm not going down just yet. don't rise just trying to be clear. that is, as they said. uh, the americans of south korea that they will allow south korea to draw up plans for a nuclear strike for their defense, that is, so that we offer a similar version of our nuclear umbrella for north korea, i say again, do not be like the americans and what they say is that wording , which i said, it is quite understandable. russia is not, let's say. the intervention of military force in north korea and an attempt to overthrow this korea no kind of weapon is enough that

the americans - it was all designed for the internal korean market, because the koreans demanded. they say we should participate in this then the americans said when the united states uses nuclear weapons against north korea, you will also participate in this discussion. well , it's between them what a difference is not in this sense. sit while doing north-south korean officers or not will the very fact of using weapons to the difference. it's easier for no one to do this, they are ready. it was absolutely correct here . boat

well they weren't supposed to and so the american submarines are spinning around. colombia a submarine with non-strategic nuclear weapons. it is quite enough against the koreans; they don’t need a strategic one because they want to place other strategic objects on korean territory. it's all about electronics. this is all about new radars. and now it's china's problem. and russia because the one from which the batteries that are on the territory of south korea and their locators scans russia to the urals

, the locator is a conventional system against missile defense, that is, to strengthen the electronic intelligence system. and they wanted to control the entire russian space and take advantage of russia. they carried out a lot, staged a lot of adventures of provocations after the forty-fifth year. they all ended in failure. and in korea, its vietnam and the middle east, and one of the goals

or results of operating ukraine should be that this was the last american provocation directed against russia that after ukraine they never had, nor the desire to be unable to arrange such and such another provocation against russia and the results of these battles should put an end to this once and for all. then everyone they saw shut up. to the beginning, when they showed this whole list of politicians talking about how to remove the president of russia, here i am from a psychological point of view. i was just curious to see each of them, because each of them tried. try

somehow bypass it not to say directly. yes, you have to kill. even though some of them said so. and here is the discussion of this issue itself. that's from the point of view of the value of western democracy, as we often talk about it now. this is just a complete perversion. it's hard to believe that they all look like. uh, they discussed it. they all look like crime bosses. now, if we collect them all together, here each separately, but in one room we collect them all. and here they are sitting at the table. and so, starting from chatterbox, which is such a godfather there, and he begins to talk about what needs to be removed. you have to do it and concretely goes. in general, there is a specific, of course, pumping, but this psychological trauma of this actually brought to such an internal hysteria, in which those to whom they undoubtedly broadcast it. this also gets this exaltation, which should make someone

act in some way. but there is something new in this, i will remind you in september 2021, two months before my election as chancellor olaf schulz in a children's program on german television talked to three or four children who asked him a lot of questions at one point. uh, the boy asks him, and putin is a criminal, but armed answers. well, he thought about it for a bit. so he was not yet a chancellor, he was a candidate. he says a criminal, and putin should be in prison. putin should be in jail. and then it goes on like this. i then showed this from the video and then they quickly removed this video from the internet, but it still he survived, that is, ola in scholz still not being even in general, he really didn’t even know whether he would be chancellor or not, but this is the position that putin the criminal putin should be in prison. well, then i didn’t say that the president of russia can even

be said. that it can be killed or it can be eliminated, was it like that at all? i don't imagine. if he had said so then, but now already, looking at everything. in general, i have no doubt that in all likelihood such thoughts were already wandering then, and so on. they already understood, yes, and they said decided for themselves. well, probably russia needs to be beheaded, and so on , something can already be done. it was not for nothing that they remembered the bull. all this today's office, headed by the british citizen maria singer, who is now in fact, as i understand it, in several european cities, and of course, they are the first listeners of what those people said because they are the first listeners. they understand what they get by doing so. e job, and quite openly. they receive a task for which you can get money, for which you can get some rewards.

well, there i don’t say oscar right away, he’s in the future, and there may be some other oscar , and this is where the biggest danger lies, because if we talk about what bolton directs, let’s say his speech in e, some , well, conditionally there are traitors. e in the leadership of russia i think not, i think not, their task and their psychological impact is directed primarily to this is a proxy for fbk. for offices like this, although there are not so many of them already, they are, in principle, like this, because it is these people who are able through its network that no doubt exists in russia to find those sources of leaked information, including about putin's whereabouts and his movements. about some of his habits, about something else. well, i'm not a specialist, not special services, well, they perfectly understood that , of course, that the best information is obtained from the outskirts of the village from waiters from servants from

drivers from those who are nearby, and those who can do some work without being, while ideologically loyal to his boss. and these people are very often easily bought and sold, so just vk and their structures. and theirs is just a network. here it is, in principle, and extends to these e, well, let's say layers of society or layers of management, in which you can receive information, where does the melodious get this information? their previous so-called investigation. after all, they did not receive from their superiors any generals or managers, they received from some ordinary regional departments. wherever someone was , he had access to a computer, he could download and transfer it. this is where lies today, one of the biggest dangers, probably, but smersh is already at the final stage, as it were, when he is to be shot. no, no matter how difficult just the boss, when it is necessary to identify and investigate firing squads - these are

other people. well, you know better here after death. well, in short, e does not concern this , they just studied it. and also because, well, mortal experience is very important, in general, now you suddenly begin to evaluate it in a completely different way. who, how did the soviet government work during the great patriotic war , undoubtedly, in the most diverse aspects? yes some things i think it would be very not bad to adopt, no doubt just as it seems to me, a very correct idea was a member of the revva-insoviet. that is, according to the staff sent to the palette, that is, a lot would be important. it’s very important to control, check, help death, in general, a plant is needed, how they began to work. do you have a lot of we given experience or world war ii? it is not necessary, in general , to throw away our experience at work and replace it. it is not known that he found a very good one. i'm

all for it. well, there is one more direction or one line that needs to be understood and notice. on tuesday, at your program , i said that the prime minister of ukraine would be with the pope of rome ; today he was a shygal. it's very interesting, because he actually had an attempt there. he spoke very well, then with such a short tap, in which he said that the pope and i talked about the zelensky peace plan, the so-called peace plan. well, just to be clear. how did this meeting end? i will say that it started at 9. cet at 9:50 it ended, that is, it lasted today for what for the pope who meets the head of the government of the state - this is nothing at all, taking into account translations and all these other things, but when it ended, the pope gave a shmagol, such a bronze vase in the form of such a flower, which means, and here is the fragility of our hopes. here is the symbolic meaning, and here is this bronze flower

that he gave him, but it is interesting that the other came out from the pope of rome. headed straight for two other people who are directly related to all this activity, these are the people who, uh, work closely with the british, again work with the poles and work with the special services. it can't be with the special services. but at least they work with those proxies who, through the catholic church, have an influence on a very decent part of the population. these are also those people through whom you can broadcast ideas about anything. it's just motionless cardinals cardinals. yes, well , of course, i’ll add one literally line, in addition, he also visited the manual the maltese cross which is the cross which have two of their very large representations, one in lviv and the other in ivano-frankivsk. and if anyone doesn’t know, then they are doing very powerful work

among the population, just the same, connected with opposition to orthodoxy, i would report on attempts to successfully destroy orthodoxy, i think that including this, including the pechersk lavra, i won’t be surprised at anything now advertizing after we will continue in new structure.