if we can wait, maybe then that's just not idiotic. but when i say that we can wait, it means that this decision can be made today, maybe in two weeks, or in a month. i understand the price of this brace, but we will not die this month. though some of the trouble she's in today can't afford to wait, 'cause if the financial markets crash, that'll be the end of it. here is the key

financial markets and what will end, but the great depression did not lead to the great revolution the depression did not lead to the revolution, and there the rates went off scale, the crisis, firstly, would be one and a half times stronger than the great depression led to the depression, and like our nineties, the standard of living of the population fell by 40%. as historical experience shows, when the standard of living falls by more than 40% , the socio-political regime completely changes, that is, in america it has not changed. so he didn’t change like that then, although they didn’t reach a critical value, and we came to the nineties. we have just the opposite, we first they brought down political regimes, and then rushed this colossal fall in the population did not lead.

it just didn’t lead to the fact that they changed the vile, corrupt yeltsin regime. therefore, i would say that we really have come to a situation where it is possible to put our economy on a trajectory of sustainable growth with a series of not very difficult, but correct, as it were, meaningful decisions. . is she now on a different trajectory? we have some potential. but, if we look at the fact that statistics in general, as if i talked about it many times, a rather specific science, but there are indirect signs. so here are indirect signs, for example, in terms of traffic volume. does not show sustainable economic growth. unfortunately, minus 1.5 - 2% is transported. this is also unpleasant, that is, in other words. we need more

percentages. with what period of time and in value or in real, but the volume, but the volume can be considered natural can be considered this railway, i will explain why i say, because we say when we we say railway, then ore and other things that are transported there play a big role. yes, but it might not. it's not just this it's an obvious thing, because i'm sorry. and me, what is happening with us with the transportation sector is comparable to the evacuation of e- industry in the forty-first year. uh, so to speak did not take to the military law, because the restructuring of logistics, tied to the west in a huge number of top three to the east. that this has led to a physical expression. here is such a decrease. this is nonsense, complete, but the gain, and the revenue of the transport company at grew up in this, because all this is

blocked. on the overall rise, world prices are resisting logistics problems. dima, well, it’s impossible to consider it grown up, because, firstly, there are inflationary processes. secondly, there are various kinds of games associated with kickbacks and other different ones. i don’t know about any games, to be honest, i don’t know, but i know, but what are you a few? so logistics companies, i know how they work. we now have statistics. that's what mishustin did just to make everything transparent, that is, any transaction about games about some friends who sued not well, so when we say sustainable or unstable growth, well, we'll see, but for now we can say that we beat all forecasts and this is different, and he, because we switched to a completely different management system.

our work has fundamentally changed so much now. the government is simply poorly understood by people , there really was a revolution . increasing volume? at the same time, the country is not suffocating from the fact that everything goes to the military, but civilians. no, this is also very important. i say again that we cannot know exactly what is happening in the economy simply because any statistics. she has some hmm based on this, you need to take them to economists and write a statement about the translation of the weather forecaster. because if we proceed from the fact that we cannot know for sure. but yes, we are not given to predict, well weather forecasters. i said i was the first one here to say that we have a serious chance. on economic growth in this country miracles at the beginning of the year. yes, we have it coming. god forbid well, he's

just visible. well, really, if you look at the question in general, it is different, that our economic practice is now ahead of economic theory. we have a big problem with this. this is what the era of the swu or the age of war showed, that the whole idea of ​​which economy, big and small. which in case which is not meaningless in the previous system our economy is much larger than the official figures that were attributed to it in of course why? because it became clear that different sectors have not only there, but also, let’s say relatively speaking, there are different weights, because once you pump up the service sector and i think that this is equivalent, relatively speaking, ruble in the service sector, but it turns out that we don't have another economic structure. we have significantly less finances, thank god, and

the sanctions hit the financial sector. and we don't have it there. here we have we have a completely different price structure, we actually have, if we look at purchasing power parity at compared to the west. we are also getting stronger. and for this reason, everything is just here, it’s clear, and the theory absolutely confirms it. the other question is how we can make sure that this potential growth is not just realized in practice by the end of the year. well, he became an empty freak. this is the task for today. and why, so that we grow ? no, the concept of sustainability always scares me. well, i can, something i, i , all this is all due to the fact that yes, i don’t pretend to anything at first, so that there is growth and to keep it stable. well, as you know, the biggest disappointment happens on

growth. there must be a stable economic system, of course, and one capable of presenting such an economic system under the guise, of course, when we start like this. let's get the itch contour, reproduction of the contour. we do not have a structure, for example, at a pace, otherwise, in your opinion, the military-industrial complex would work. we were cut off a large number of anton that they managed to drag it. and what now you and me are showing absolutely amazing machines they ask who is doing says we are temporary. in general, some things surprise me to establish the production of unique new types. we sent so many different things. you know, i was most surprised there when i went for lenochka. now we're getting in there. well, i don’t

know exactly where the front line is 7 km, but the stronghold has been dug. there in the ground. i go to the men. they have 3d printers in front of the printers, and they print on them everything that is needed for the war, they show , of course, this is well, and you think, i look, wait as he says, well, we have everything. and it's funny, of course, it would be ideal in this 3d printer and everything would be domestic, so we'll come too, everything will be fine. most importantly, don't worry. more precisely, do not worry, they are all more precisely, worry, but during advertising. we install, open , watch russian channels and all series of movies and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries. for free without registration, we look in the application or

on the website about our economy, the new economic policy, then people really have problems blinkin speak russian deformations.

the man asks you about the computer. what are you carrying? what are you carrying? andrey, you could do it so well, andrey, translate into russian what he said, this is a terrible , seasoned human being, when he worked as an assistant to the baidan in the election campaign, he then organized a letter. these 51 people from the intelligence services called up and corresponded, so to speak, about them speaking out and saying that there was no laptop at all. this is russian disinformation in essence. now he is for it is justified. i'm just surprised. i remember talking about the fact that america will end. here is my faith in the united states , what they can cause when they remove

it like that, they removed it, all the same, therefore, therefore, now this is what the story is now developing about blinkin. i'm still different there. story. i was very interested in hunter biden's alimony, which is himself. already asked now to reduce the republicans clung to it, because it makes it possible to reveal the entire financial background of hunter biden. it was very profitable, just in general for the election campaign, and since , in my opinion, the number of bidens has already increased there, which, up to 12 already, up to 12 , the number of bidens is multiplying , the river started back. now it has doubled, therefore, it is too early to call a clan, of course, your own, of course, of course, yes. this is the ringtone on my phone. okay, so actually. that's what

's happening now, of course, it's a very interesting interesting point, as now the republicans clung to them. i think that at least they won’t let go for a long time on may 9, they are going to, it seems, they are still collecting from the biden, they broke it. grandfather, he'll have to talk to the leaders of the congress with the minority majority leaders there, he'll talk the same as he does with this guy, i don't even know how he'll talk to them, but he spent a lot of time in congress himself. i'm thinking of somehow talking to my colleagues, maybe they'll drink and eat for the sake of victory. disperse in general, in fact. this is the thing they're going to. and as if a holiday, but they have the eighth. yes right, that means it’s already after, and i just wanted to dwell a little on another issue that has now been raised with poland , because, frankly, it was considered to change a little by and large, because more was being prepared for a long time, as the main one is now already a backup front of the struggle with russia

then. i remember this old new europe, e.g., when donald trump, the former secretary of defense, back in 2001, already said about this , there were already the achievements of the institute. entrepreneurship at that time was the brains of the economists, well, there sat, at least, in the research assistant's savagery. he was vice president, then became after that his wife managed the finances there. here they were developing how to nominate poland to the role of one of the main pillars of the european union about american europe from here this idea of ​​​​a new old europe came from here and therefore, poland wants to be out of a hyena on the lion, she wants to come out with her bucharest nine , which the poles too. i think with the filing of the americans. there, in the fourteenth year, this format was launched. so they want to go out just to western europe leafing through europe turned out to be supplying them with their rear, and hence the requirements for

the germans. that is, you pay us another reparation for what kind of violation you did, and the court is essentially. you can conduct. this is in the form of various tranches supporting our military goals, much more, because the troops in europe are increasing, but here the question is, what quality of these troops are second-rate units. where they are, maybe there are a lot of them in number, or these are combat units. that's what they have, they can fight, they are transferring to the far east how much i i understand here, they lead yes, here is our presence. we are here, we guys are here, we are not in finland now agreed on the bases, but on the main striking forces. it will still be poles, these are eastern europeans, by the way, who, by the way, i believe that they have more of finland. that is , this is our russian city. helsinki gelfors, i apologize temporarily examples and so on. that's why here. ah, liberation. we have many more

territories. it will be necessary to release, but more now she will come, we will return the money for alaska, but no, probably. no. we are money for alaska we will return alaska back, but, in my opinion, they were not received, by the way, speaking, in my opinion. received, so come back in my opinion, and the russian government and this money money i never saw it. there were seven seven and a half million, in my opinion, they saw some third or fourth part there. they they there managed to us, so to speak, circle again again. and so here, when the poles are now demanding they are squeezing our property. and what, in fact, they repeat what the owner did. remember september 1st. e 2017 trump yes, in power , the consulate building in san francisco is already being taken away from us, which we did in response. this is how

alexander mikhailovich spoke about the financial authorities now. here, we observe the same passivity, and in this, if we then practically took away parking from the americans, you did nothing. yes, after that, then they began to take away from us the gold and foreign exchange reserves that we had stored there, and began to take away the property from our entrepreneurs. well, now the poles have come to this. what, in fact, are we have done it now. right now, we have summoned the charge d'affaires of poland in russia and told him that we are unhappy with this and that, to be honest, when dmitry anatolyevich wrote here, about what we are maintaining diplomatic relations. you know, i have the same question. and what will it give? and yes, with a break, at least with one country we will break off relations, which the team showed that they said to the poles and the west did not see. it's just you wait want to be ripped off no.

they don't want to figure it out, they don't want they want you to tear it apart, but if you take turns you will speak, you will hear from the point of view of everyone. let's try to say this, we haven't done this with any country, but try yes, because because the united states now here it surprises me. yes, here is the resolution of the general assembly no. 284 on april 26, which was adopted in cooperation with him, the council of europe , it is written there in the preamble that russia is the aggressor. that is why we are strengthening cooperation between the un and the councils of europe yes, and signed, who voted for him, did you carefully read read. yes, it's no coincidence that polyansky gave a clear comment. just under the part that relates to the discussion , all these countries to which they are trying to say, they say that they don’t, they don’t, well, we don’t

subscribe to this, we oppose it. look, uh, the republic of south africa, for example, just abstained and once again i say and whole. here i say it again. look here. you are now quoting conditionally, because it is no coincidence that the slit that our media make is polyansky, who works at the representative office un deputy. if i understand correctly, vasily nebenzya gave a detailed analysis that these are the countries that are friendly to us, they clearly said that we agree with this. but with this article, in fact, which we are strongly opposed to. here they support the question, in fact, they were not concerned with the restless and just concerned, therefore, when you are, when you give information, call it exactly from europe, of course, they did. these are the countries our partners in the cis , i am quoting in polyansky, so they did the following and did not support this paragraph during separate vote, but pravoslavl for the whole day made an interpretive

statement to the effect. what does not support the politicization of the resolution on cooperation with humanitarian organizations, the council of europe, in principle, practically does not apply, nor india . as you understand, i am not talking specifically about things, that is, therefore, it is impossible to blame our friends and partners because they did not support us. . it is necessary clearly, but i cannot say with real material, what exactly they said, what they told for some reason, they did not vote for our reasoning in this resolution. it was possible to calmly refrain from doing what they did when they separately said that they did not support this point and made a specific statement in the states, everyone is discussing it so that they throw their own idea here here, but i don’t know what is being discussed in the states no, we're broadcasting. here is the program of the state for what

i know, it is what is written directly in the documents of the un and what our representative prior says. this is what i know for sure. well, let's stick to our opinion of this document. i think they could just refrain could not do as they could little of this strangely comes from its also internal logic. they are from what we consider them to be a certain protocol of behavior from within logic, for example, the china of principles. uh, which we share, for example, no interference in internal affairs. when you started the program you showed that you showed the french. yes, here is the french statement that he does not support politicization , china sharply opposed this, for example, they publish a document that is constantly published every year, which is condemned human rights in the same united china no to us. it is necessary to draw the same change the principle of non-interference. fine. we

must become china we must become in brazil a policy that is designed for a tougher attitude from the west, because now it is necessary to be able to support this toughness in the diplomatic field. we can be more rigid with respect. although why did we decide so. here is zakharova maria vladimirovna when she was standing on sunday she explained that if we pass this now, then a wild number of people who are trying to reach us from ukraine through poland will be deprived of everything, because in poland what is happening we give them documents according to which they can go through belarus to russia . well, as if the next following will go further, because once they did not answer, and so on it will go further. well, let's immediately use nuclear weapons then relax and you approaches. strangely, you propose to gesture diplomatically, let's, no, this is not necessary. let's be.

they took a nuclear baton on the head, gave one separately taken poland, the rest 100 times will think and salt the woman will be a nuclear baton. in poland, this means here throughout nato, well, and well, and that's it, a nuclear war is global, which, well, that's good, but there will be a global nuclear war further, that america will fit in for poland, or what, and what did you decide? am i telling you no? no, of course, they did not accidentally talk about this many times, what falls out to fit in. why america abrika you? well destruction for some bigger one, because if they don't fit in, they won't so they will be completely isolated. who are the americans? yes, the united states is now now, this is now ridiculous. america is in complete isolation from its gland of the whole of their union, all of their allied treaties have flown, because america's nuclear umbrella is better. let me remind you that even an article in nato does not imply an instant response. they are not contracts. they keep such a portion.

of course, the troops and the financial system, what the hell contracts and signatures such as if you hit, if you hit later, there are also american troops there. well, everyone is squandered pseudopolitics the size of a wagon. well, there are also american troops of the same poland, and if we fight, then we fight according to your american logic. well, good. you say the americans, you say, some contracts will collapse; the americans have no contracts with anyone. they have these contracts. i never these contracts there is. well, okay. yes, well, they will break this contract. i will not afghanistan helped the agreements that were not heard agreed, afghanistan of course,

their main partner is the voice of the main allies. not he had nato, he had no intention of intervening in the military. yes, afghanistan is being attacked. that's how many americans died there 18 states the last is this be prepared to gesture everywhere. well, why am i why, too, do not understand? why so firm here we are a little bit of a word? just why bring them to the great rigidity, when, no matter how little they give, they are pinched. yes, i don’t know, well , the baltic states are not well diplomatic, but i’m generally for absolutely tough. in general, i think that now we need to take and fuck the nuclear weapons, what it is, and how it works. what is better to see? proxy war, where are the facts

against? on at 30 it's just a war. no big deal, no big deal. yes, for me, the death of our soldiers is much more terrible than the disappearance of the entire nato bloc. well, together with us, only in such a way that they decided that together with us we just have a colossal advantage in this type of weaponry that should be used, and it also includes states. yes, in addition to europe and the european home, it’s great, the working part and that the strait and not comrade stalin, we talked about insolence. that's how since he’s looking, now the americans think our programs are okay against the russian language, whatever, they ’ll be afraid anyway, using what they have, because until now we have people who are not the main thing, so that’s it god forbid, god forbid, it should be the maximum two nuclear weapons, if we have two shortcomings, well, that is, please repeat

the sugar saying that it is enough just to oak like this neatly for the channel. yes, they throw poseidons on the site fixed, but what's the difference he talked about the poseidon nuclear charge, more precisely, a fairly nuclear 50 megaton, in my opinion, i'm in a garden bomb. and this is why what will be the size of the strait? yes? here's what i'm interested in. here, of course, such a position is not a single pacifist nearby, many years ago he said that all this would meet in situations similar to the caribbean crisis only a degree of 1,000 times more powerful. that was my forecast given five years ago in relation to the situation publicly, the second. here, if you're not ready.

if you need to gasp, no, i'm yes, i am if you are not ready, if you need to gasp, by the way, it's very funny when two professors one is completely unknown who, well, discussing in the studio whether they are ready to gasp, it looks pretty funny, yes, just simply, so that the audience understands that i am conscious. yes, i say this only because the controversy that this is here has arisen here. yes. what does it matter that i don't think about it now. here, the second, if you are going to send diplomats there to cut off the gas for something else, but at the same time you are not ready to gasp. so all this will be used against you. well, i just don't have time to explain it logically. well, well, understand that at the moment when you know this notorious red line that i will not press the button. here you will be brought to this button. dut and make you take your pants

off because you thought you didn't know anymore. this is how any big one is arranged. this is how any big game is arranged for serious uncles. i wanted to tickle the nerves of vices, they do not crawl out of the cunning slums with gilyarovsky, we do not bend fearfully. and now keep your pockets cleaned in an instant. and he could still break something with a knife, well, the corpse would have waited, a couple of hours the killer would find the criminal.