it will be safer for them in israel and they left. he stayed there, despite his views. go home europe is a separate region and everyone feels that europe is subject to an american decree, but they are very far from war for ordinary hungarians, the conflict in ukraine is not an abstract confrontation between good and evil, this is an element of a big world game that can hit each of them at any moment many trust us with the common sense of politicians, but without the certainty that he will take up alexander popov especially for international review. great britain

coronation of charles iii may 9 on victory day pay tribute to the memory of the heroes of the great patriotic war become the connecting thread of generations we see with you the first document on the founding of odessa by the beginning of the 20th century thanks to the generous favors of the russian emperors, odessa has become one of the most comfortable cities in russia russia has never the city could not exist . classical destruction. classical destruction . within three to four days , from five to ten thousand people were destroyed. shows

the local population that the government is ready will end with only one, odessa will cease to be. it’s not bad to be a king , lieutenant musketeers said to himself, absorbed in the contemplation of his surroundings, here is the king, studded with gold and diamonds, like solomon, full of flowers, like a spring bow. now he is being bombarded with bouquets. so he can drown in them. and if he had come here 2 months ago , it would have rained down on him, as many bullets and cores of law, it’s not bad to be the king of the lieutenant , his name is d’artagnan, he is present at the coronation of the new english monarch charles ii, a scene from novel.

dumas vicomte is good-willed 20 years later, completing the musketeer trilogy, the next charles the third in a row, crowned 363 years later with bullets with the cores of kings , now thank god they don’t throw passions boil, but basically the family charles ii, the son of the executed charles i, was called, by the way, a merry king for his abundance of love and countless illegitimate children. charles iii also needs the title of merry. he hasn't grown up. and now the age is not the same. the british monarchy is one of the oldest in europe in about half a century, it will celebrate millennium anniversary, the first time the title. the king of england applied alfred the great from the ossos dynasty to himself at the end of the 9th century. he united most of britain by his power and reorganized the angle of the monarch's power. after his death, civil strife began in the country

, which was put to an end by the norman invasion in 1066 at the battle of hastings. the leader of the normans, william the conqueror, defeated the anglo-saxon army and proclaimed himself king of england from that moment on, the country was ruled by representatives of the norman dynasty, who came up with the idea of ​​numbering the monarchs, it is believed that frontogenets who ruled the country for almost 300 years. it was she who gave the english people king richard the lionheart, who was headed by the third. at the end of the 14th century, as a result of a coup in england , a side branch of the planet came to the lancasters in the person of king henry iv . during his reign, the hundred years war with france came to an end, which ended in the defeat of england in 455 between the branches of the lancasters and yorkies, a dynastic flare broke out

the war between alla and the white rose has ceased. she is only 30 years old. later, when the male line lancaster died out and a relative in the female branch ascended the english throne. henry tudor in the coat of arms of the new rose dynasty united england emerged from the middle ages and turned into one of the leading european powers and appointed a distant relative of the scottish king jacob from the erasted dynasty as the successor during the reign of their last representative , queen anne of england and where they united into a single sovereign state in great britain the kings of the next hanoverian dynasty ruled the country until 1901, then the british empire occupied almost a quarter of the land. the last of the hanoverians, queen victoria, married prince albert of saxon, gubburg godsky, their son king edward the seventh was the only

representative of this dynasty, and his heir king george the fifth during the first world war, he replaced, sounding german the name of the dynasty on the crown. the british monarchy has not been considered exemplary for a long time, but still attracts everyone's attention, not a single event in the royal family goes unnoticed about why the british monarchs attract, we will talk with a wonderful specialist historian, olga and dmitrieva olga vladimirovna coronation - is it a beautiful performance or it initially has some special meaning, of course, initially. uh, it's a sacred procedure. this is a very important ritual that binds the future monarch as well. yes, the one who is being crowned with higher powers and in fact. in this ritual, the moment of the appearance of these sacred qualities of the king to society, uh, takes place, and

the legitimation of his power takes place. actually. it is not the constitution of the power itself in this. this ritual also takes place in england at the coronation. e trace their history back to 973 with the coronation of king edgar. of course, much water has flown under the bridge since then. and i think that, in the modern world, there are few who believe in divine nature in europe, it was and remains fairly, if any special features were british during the middle ages, perhaps there was nothing special there. well, uh, in the 16th-17th century, when the monarchical regimes in europe began to move towards absolutism, here the specifics of the english monarchy came to light - before, basically, yes, who, correctly, throughout the entire 16th century , did not stop gathering parliament, this

continuing dialogue. uh, monarchs with parliament. this is an interesting feature that has greatly influenced the political culture of england, and it was perceived as a very positive feature that the state maintains a dialogue with the representative institution that embodies society and the british themselves. very happy. and we have a mixed monarchy, when the wise kings rule consent of the parliament of the cow. and this is actually. this, uh, ensured the stability of the political regime. it's a trait. and which was winning for the monarchy, well, then we know the 17th century, after all, there was a crisis before the stuart was brought in, there was a civil war overthrowing the monarchy, but later, when it was established, it can be perceived as a kind of proposal of tradition and uh, it is

perceived as the cradle of parliamentarism. yes, when the absolute regimes throughout europe stopped interacting with representative bodies. here england has remained a state where the constitutional monarchy is perceived, how to be decisive for politics, especially external xix century, the reign of queen victoria is very important, probably, she was the last of the english sovereigns who tried to somehow express her attitude towards the prime minister. there do not agree with them to express their dissatisfaction. and in particular , on the basis of the fact that she had not certain related interests, gymnastic interests, but it must be said that they never come out for national purposes. to the fore. how much did she influence the self-awareness of kings, the fact

that they ruled at some point, at least formally, over half the world. here is this imperial project the idea that england should be a special place in the world should not be overseas dominions. well after all formed very early sixteenth century and colonial expansion. england is beginning to be tied to these first ones and it has such theorists, for example, as the famous dr. teese. they say that england's destiny is to rule the seas. yes , here are the first settlements that became english. on colonies or married dogs, after all, they are named after their virginia testaments first. yes, then through every first james that is here, but the role of the monarch is extremely great. of course, he approves of all this and, uh, it gives this status of an empire, and the consequence of the english kingdom, when england really spreads its

influence globally. this also applies to america and africa, india, of course. eh, queen. victoria station is the first empress of india and is very like it. we know this from her memoirs in her diaries. and that's flattering. she will be very pleased that she receives this title. well, later. you know this role. the british commonwealth of the nation at the head of which stands the monarch now it is transformed simply into the commonwealth and. uh, there are united uh, various states that were once dynastic connected with england or were colonies. or there were no colonies at all. yes, they just think that it is beneficial for them. and here, uh, there is the symbolic role of the monarch, just to embody, as it were , freely the association of these e states, that is, the symbolic function remains responsible

for a symbolic positive representation of the nation itself. yes, they are public. they, uh, patronize problems. there's an education of medicine culture, yes, that is, they embody. they must embody everything, the best that is. e in the english nation for several decades, the british monarchy is a chain of family scandals. ah, all of england is my family, yes, and this really appeals to the mass consciousness, the carriers of which are mostly women and housewives, and this idea that sovereigns the same as we are, yes, and you can observe this endless or bodies of family problems. yes , some restless children of their some mistakes and delusions. this is all, of course, and lost in its prestige and there were decades and so

on. they really wanted to cancel boris. yes , but i think that there are also very few fans of the monarchy, because after all it is an ancient institution. and such traditions are always appreciated, they always like to be a millennial kingdom there. the death of queen elizabeth ii has opened a new girl in the library biography of the queen, where her put says, she is on the left section of the story, and on the right is oren brown's fairy tales for adele telegraph queen since childhood was fond of corgi dogs. here they discuss the news. one tells the other there are rumors that we might be laid off, and the other responds. well , of course, charles iii's spaniel i knew it, the banger is at home, perhaps i could negotiate with the french who are protesting against pension reform. and even convincing them that

working until old age is not so bad. than the gift of nikolaev on the theme of escape from the royal prince harry's family and his wife meghan markle 's elegant pun. it's just that it was a coronavirus from him, in the end you can get rid of the image of megan mark from adam sieglitz on the crown, racism is written in an interview with the famous american tv presenter of the opera winfre megan said that racism flourishes in the royal family, allegedly they were interested in the skin color of her child because of a fraction african blood. the topic of this interview is continued by dave graylon on the screen of oprah, who says megan and harry told everything to which elizabeth ii , who was then still alive, replies moglo to be worse is good that in their place is not a prince. andrew against him in the united states opened a case of sexual violence. he was linked to

the infamous jeffrey epstein. the idea of ​​​​the eternal rivalry between russia and britain as far as this was reflected in the relations of the dynasty, if we start from the moment when diplomatic relations were established, yes, in 1553, then just the 16-17th century at that time was very such, well, firstly , mutual study and absolutely us special. uh, relations with diplomacy. the second trade when the countries were allies of england was privileged as a partner of russia blago in trade and in the foreign policy arena proper up to the era of peter i, the era of peter i, that is, the priodors under the stuarts under the first ganors. and this is england. at this time

, it has no serious dynastic ties with us. she supports e and your stories. testaments first. yes, and uh, very actively supports uh relationship with catherine ii, but there is none. that's what we call dynastic ties. they arise under queen victoria and this is the period. she gives away her children and granddaughters, in russia, in denmark, her son marries one of alfred's grand duchesses, she becomes maria alexander becomes a dukinindinburg , then two granddaughters marry one another for nicholas ii, another for grand duke sergei alexandrovich, that is, here you are, but uh, the foreign policy interests of russia britain at

this moment, uh, then it converges and diverges. this is a period. e from rapprochement to complete antagonism. well, of course, the crimean war. naturally, and this greatly cooled relations both within the family and general political, but in the first world war, we are punished on one side, and the global interests of these two great empires, in which they really compete, and in many regions this is the black sea region , the mediterranean region is a sub-rivalry for the balkans yes, for the crimea , the caucasus for india, pakistan, afghanistan, that is, this is a lot lease clashes certainly, but it is a coalition yes against germany, so it seems to me that it is impossible

to generalize here. eh, some still in the nature of specific epochs of periods. do you understand? after all, victoria was the grandmother of europe, she really family ties from the danish home to germany yes, and uh, all relatives are fighting among themselves. yes, such a rather complicated position, so i would not demonize the history of our relations. you just need to study it, you just need to study it, thanks. we talked with goy dmitrieva during the rakish invasion of great britain was a loyal squire of the united states, the then prime minister tony blair loudly stated for certain. it is known that saddam hussein is ready to use chemical biological weapons of mass destruction

within 45 minutes from the moment of adoption political solution needed immediate intervention turned out to be a lie in the arab war there was no concept of victory, it was replaced by existential frategi exit strategy. how to finish the operation and get out of the way with the least losses. this is generally typical for military campaigns of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, either punitive operations, or humanitarian interventions, either for the purpose of colonization, or to maintain their own prestige, it always ended so-so today , on the contrary, everyone talks only about victory, and to stand behind the price no one is going. what's happened military victory in the modern confrontation with the unfortunately called hybrid , no one can fully formulate it, but even mentioning the exit strategy is considered indecent , solid ones are not inclined. it was an international

review. see you. one morning, on a call from the switchboard, vladimir vladimirovich putin was talking about a group of six people who were arrested, they planned to eliminate them. i thought, well, okay. if not, they're hunting me, i'll go. i'm heroic in the mariupol region, you understand, in fact, it's you you live there, when you are mechanu here is the yenisei creek, ashgabat behind each of these cauldrons an amazing person who once made his choice and almost all of them said, if not we are here it is important not to stop and not change yourself for an important period and wait.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective.

dear friends, i am pleased to invite you to our new edition of the author's program

romance abomination. i hope you understand. why did you name our program like that? looking forward to seeing you?

questions related to the preparation of the celebration today, vladimir putin discussed victory day with the participants in the operational meeting of the security council.