where we experiment with conservative ideas from the incubator our regular contributor alexander popova hungarian authorities have to maneuver last year remembered by the economic shocks the costs of production have risen today people. living in fear of tomorrow, we suffer, and supermarkets suffer even more , we have to circumvent the law in order to survive in the market, the government ordered us to lower the price of eggs to 65 euro cents, and the conflict is in the east. it doesn't help us at all. on the contrary, it leads to an increase in the cost of production. hard times. until now, it has kept a relative distance from the eventful prime minister of ukraine viktor orban, though under pressure from the west, he supported sanctions against russia, well, he didn’t want them to concern strategic resources such as gas or not. we have two enemies. the first is

the clash in ukraine, the second is inflation. we need to avoid these dangers. we must overcome them, but we do not have the strength. if we want to protect hungary, if we want a peaceful life for ourselves, then we must stay away from the russian ukrainian conflict. well, staying on the sidelines is getting harder and harder to help ukraine provoke its own costs. and now hungary bans the export of ukrainian products that have accumulated on its territory, cheap goods are changing the situation on the market and harming their farmers. situation in poland. even worse for the market. received a technical product unsuitable for consumption situation. so bad that people took to the streets. they were tired not only of the grain itself, but even more of the ukrainization of the country. yes, this is the grain that comes to us from ukraine of poor quality. it does not meet european standards. it is tainted with chemicals that are banned in

our country. already 20 years. we can say that our neighbors will set up the problem not only for farmers, but also for consumers. why do polish consumers have to eat bread from unsuitable flour? gold, nagy was a teacher at a school in kishvarde for many years. this is not far from the border with ukraine, about 20 kilometers, when the conflict began, the school offered humanitarian aid to the refugees, and he and his wife. went to the border crossing help in person today they wonder. and who will help them in such a situation. and if we watch the news and see that the conflict escalates every day, it becomes dangerous, so we have been holding food supplies for several weeks, or even months, for a long time. we plant more vegetables and fruits in the garden, but we also rely on politicians. we believe in nato because nato was created to provide security, and i think our leaders know

what they are doing. it is clear that for many , russia is still to blame for everything, namely viktor urban offered to open in 2002 the house of terror museum, where you can find out how hungary defended itself from occupation, first german, and then soviet about the third reich here. the truth is little much more than the eyebrows of the hungarian communists and the soviet dictatorship. the entire communist system was based on terror because it created conditions in which people could not think, speak or act freely. this is not a worthy life . they could only sustain this long through terror. there are also those who think, otherwise now they really are almost non-existent. audible, but for example, tamas, a well-known historian professor, taught for many years in budapest. the university has home photographs of his daughter and grandchildren. but as soon as the conflict broke out in ukraine, everything changed for him, his relatives considered that in these circumstances, even in israel, it would be safer for them and left there, despite

their views. go home europe is a separate region and everyone feels that europe is subject to an american decree, but they are very far from the war, not an abstract confrontation between good and evil is an element of the great world game, which at any moment can hit each of them, many people trust us common sense in politicians, but without the certainty that he will take up alexander popov especially for international review. after advertising the beautiful coronation of charles iii of great britain

let's buy everything in lenta now 9.99 rub. buy tickets. yes, those working meetings cannot be repeated, and those very burgers can be more than 200

checks in the production of cutlets so that the quality does not change over the years qualitatively tasty and point proven video smartphone 1999 m.video deposit the best interest in sberbank is a reliable investment of funds with the most favorable rate of up to nine and a half percent per annum quick registration in the sberbank online deposit application the best interest is obviously profitable. it's not bad to be a king, the lieutenant of the musketeers said to himself , absorbed in the contemplation of his surroundings; here is the king, studded with gold and diamonds, like solomon, full of flowers, like a spring bow.

now he is being bombarded with bouquets. so he can drown in them. and if he had come here 2 months ago, he would have fallen, the same number of bullets and cannonballs of the right, it's not bad to be the king of the lieutenant. factory d'artagnan he is present at the coronation of the new english monarch, charles ii, a scene from the novel. dumas viscount benevolent 20 years later, the final musketeer trilogy of the next charles the third in a row is crowned 363 years later with bullets of the cores of kings, now glory. god is not thrown into passion. they boil, but basically the family charles ii, the son of the executed charles i , was called, by the way, a cheerful king for his love of abundance and a myriad of illegitimate the children of charles iii also did not avoid intimate relations outside officially, but before

the titles of merry. he has not grown up, and now the age is not the same. the british monarchy is one of the oldest in europe in about half a century , it will celebrate its thousandth anniversary, for the first time a title. the king of england applied alfred the great of the wessex dynasty to himself at the end of the 9th century. he united most of britain under his power, reorganized the english army, created a fleet administration and strengthened the authority of the monk's power. after his death in the country civil strife began, which was put to an end by the norman invasion in 1066 at the battle of hastings. the leader of the normans, william the conqueror, defeated the anglo-saxon army and proclaimed himself king of england from that moment on, the country was ruled by representatives of the norman dynasty, who came up

with the idea of ​​numbering the monarchs. it is believed that william's great-grandson henry ii founded the planktogenet dynasty, which ruled the country. almost 300 years. it was she who gave the english people king richard the lionheart, who led the third crusade against the holy land at the end of the 14th century. as a result of the coup, the tank came to power in england, a branch of the plan of the lancaster degenets in the person of king henry iv during his reign , the hundred years war with france fell, which ended in the defeat of england and undermined the authority of the ruling house. as a result, in 1455 , the dynastic war between alla and the white rose broke out between the branches of the lancasters and the yorks. she is only 30 years old. later, when the male line of lancaster died out and a relative from the female branch, henry tudor, in the coat of arms of the new

rose dynasties united england emerged from the middle ages and became one of the leading european powers elizabeth the last of the house of tudors left no heirs and appointed a distant relative of the scottish king jacob from the dynasty of the erased as the successor during the reign of their last representative queen anne england scotland united into a single sovereign state to great britain the kings of the next hanoverian dynasty ruled the country until 1901, when the british empire occupied almost a quarter of land. the last of the hanoverians. queen. victoria married prince albert of saxony, gubburg of god. their son king edward the seventh was the only representative of this dynasty, and his heir king george the fifth during the first world war, he changed the german-sounding dynasty to winser. the british monarchy

has not been considered exemplary for a long time, but still attracts everyone's attention, not a single event in the royal family goes unnoticed about why it is the british monarchs that attract, let's talk wonderful experts historian, olga and dmitrieva olga vladimirovna coronation - is it a beautiful performance or it originally laid some special meaning, of course. initially a ritual that binds. uh, the future monarch, yes, the one who is being crowned with higher powers and actually. in this ritual, the moment of the appearance of these sacred qualities of the king to society takes place, uh, and the legitimization of his power takes place. actually. it is the constitution itself in this. this ritual also takes place in england at the coronation. e

lead their history from 973 with the coronation king edgar a of course since then a lot of water has flowed under the bridge. and i think that, in the modern, and the world, there are few who believe in the divine nature of kings, of course, therefore it is increasingly turning into a theater of the monarchy in europe, it was and remains fairly, if any special features are specifically british, and throughout the middle ages , perhaps there was nothing special there. in the 17th century, when the monarchical regimes in europe began to move towards absolutism, here the specifics of the english monarchy were revealed in the procedures, basically, yes, which are correct throughout the 16th century. they, unlike other e, sovereigns and europe, did not stop collecting parliament. here is the ongoing

dialogue. er, monarchs with parliaments is an interesting feature that has greatly influenced the political culture of england, er, and it was perceived as a very positive feature that the state maintains a dialogue with a representative institution that embodies society and the british themselves. they said very happily that that's absolutism in the french. and the spaniards. and we have a mixed monarchy, when the wise kings rule consent of parliament king parliament. and uh, in fact, this u ensured the stability of the political regime. this is a trait that has been winning for the monarchy. well, then we know in the 17th century, after all, there was a crisis before bringing the stuart there was a civil war overthrowing the monarchy, but later, when the constitutional monarchy was established. eh yes after

the glorious revolution, then this can be perceived as a kind of proposal e tradition and uh, this e is perceived as e the cradle of parliamentarism. yes, when the absoretic regime throughout europe ceased interact independently, but england remained a state with a constitutional monarchy. e, is perceived as e something very positive, when it ceases to be decisive for politics, especially foreign. the 19th century is very important for the direction of queen victoria, probably, she was the last of the english sovereigns who tried to somehow express her attitude towards the prime ministers. there do not agree with them to express their dissatisfaction. and in particular, on the basis of the fact that she had unidentified relatives interests are gymnastic interests, but i must

say that in the newest, the newest time. they are always subordinated to common national goals. they never come out. to the fore. how much the self-awareness of kings was influenced by the fact that they ruled at some point, at least formally, over half of the world. here is this imperial project the idea that england should have a special place in the world should not be overseas dominions formed very early in the 16th century and colonial expansion, england begins. turn over the first ones and she has such theorists, for example. so dr. teese is famous, they say that the purpose of england is to rule the seas , yes, here are the first settlements that became english overseas colonies in america they were named after elizabeth eugene first, yes, then through every first james became, that is, here, and the role

of the monarch is extremely great. of course, he approves of all this and, uh, it gives this status to the empire, and the english kingdom afterward, when england really spreads its influence globally. this also applies to america, africa, india, of course. eh, queen. victoria station is the first empress of india and is very like it. we know this from her memoirs in her diaries. and this is forest, she will be very pleased. what does she get this title? well, later on, you know, this role of the british commonwealth of the nation, headed by the monarch, now it has simply transformed into the commonwealth . uh, there are united various states that were once dynastic associated with england or were colonies. or there were no colonies at all. yes, they just think that it is

beneficial for them. and here, uh, there is the symbolic role of the monarch, just to embody, as it were , the free association of these e states, that is, the symbolic function remains although the monarchical world. as such, long ago monarchs are responsible for the symbolic positive representation of the nation itself. yes, they are doing it. public-affiliated they u patronize issues, there culture medicine educations, yes, that is, they embody- they must embody everything, the best that is. e in the english nation. the last few decades of the british monarchy have been a chain of family scandals. seventh, in my opinion, he is an informal choice of such a slogan, and all england is a family, yes, and this really appeals to the mass consciousness of the carriers, who are mostly often women and

housewives. and here is this idea that the sovereign is the same as we are, yes, and one can observe this endless or well, first of all, family problems. yes, some restless children of some mistakes, delusions, all this makes. it is closer, yes, and the institute, of course, has lost its prestige and has been. for decades, and so on, borisovich wanted to cancel it. yes , but i think that there are also very few fans of the monarchy, because after all it is an ancient institution. and such traditions are always appreciated, they always like to be there, yes, a thousand-year-old kingdom. the death of queen elizabeth ii opened a new page in history drawing by patrick shoppat in the hands of a girl in the library biography of the queen, where to put it says, she is on the left section of history, and

on the right is warren brown's fairy tales for adele telegraph the queen has been fond of corgis since childhood. here they discuss the news. one tells the other there are rumors that we might be laid off, and the other responds. well, of course, charles iii's spaniel i knew ben jennings for the left-wing newspaper the guardian king charles 3, says the majordomo, perhaps i could negotiate with the french who are protesting against pension reform. and even to convince them that working until old age is not so bad attic nikolaev on the topic of running around the royal family of prince harry and his wife meghan markle elegant game. it was just the coronavirus from him. in the end, you can get rid of the image of meghan markle, from adam sieglitz. nacarone wrote racism in an interview with the famous

american tv presenter of the opera winfre megan said that racism flourishes in the royal family, allegedly they were interested in the skin color of her child because of the bit of african blood. the topic of this interview is continued by dave graylon on the screen, who says megan and harry told everything to which elizabeth ii, who was then still alive, replies it could be it's worse that it's not a prince in their place. andrew against him in the united states opened a case of sexual violence. he was linked to the infamous jeffrey epstein. fu we have a rooted idea of ​​​​the eternal rivalry between russia and britain as far as this was reflected in the relations of the dynasty, if we start from the moment when diplomatic relations were established, yes, in 1553, then just the 16th-17th

century. it's a time of very uh, well, first-of- a-kind examinations and very special uh relations in diplomacy in trade, when countries were allies, england was a privileged partner of russia in trade and in the foreign policy arena, in fact , until the era of peter i, the era of peter i, that is, the priodors under the stuarts under the first hannomers a-a. this relationship is very very, allied and friendly, and england at this time does not have serious dynastic ties with us. she supports uh and your wall of the throne. testaments first. yes, and uh, very supportive, and the relationship is active with catherine ii, but there is none. here's what we we call dynastic ties. they arise

under queen victoria and this is the period. uh, very interesting, very specific. on the one hand. she gives away her children and granddaughters in russia in denmark her son marries one of the grand duchesses, and she becomes alfreda maria alexandrovna becomes dukinindinburg, then two granddaughters marry one for the future nicholas ii, the other for grand duke sergei alexandrovich, that is, uh , here arise. uh, active family ties, ah, but russia's foreign policy interests britain at this point uh, either converges or diverges. this is a period. e from rapprochement to complete antagonism. that is, of course, the crimean war. naturally, and

this greatly cooled relations both within the family and general political, but in the first world war, it turns out to be on the same side of the barrique. yes, that is, here it is necessary, probably, to distinguish after all, but global ones. the interests of these two great empires, in which they really compete in many regions, are the black sea region and the mediterranean region. this is sub rivalry for the balkans yes for the crimea transcaucasia for india pakistan afghanistan that is to say, there are a lot of rental clashes, of course. but on the other hand. ah, in the first world war. we find ourselves in the same potash, but against germany, therefore, it seems to me, it is impossible here, in general, er, after all, some kind of character of specific eras and

periods. you see, victoria was a grandmother in europe; she really has a family connection from the danish home to germany. yes, and uh, all relatives are at war with each other. this is such a difficult position, so i would not demonize the history of our relationship. necessary you just need to study it, thank you. we spoke with olga dmitrieva during the arab invasion, great britain was a loyal squire of the united states , then prime minister tony blair vociferously stated. it is known that saddam hussein is ready to use chemical biological weapons of mass destruction within 45 minutes from the moment a political decision is needed immediately. the intervention

turned out to be a lie in the iraq war , there was no concept of victory; it was replaced by exist freddy's exit strategy. how to finish operation and get out of the way with the least losses. this is generally typical for military campaigns of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, either punitive operations, or total humanitarian interventions, either for the purpose of colonization, or to maintain their own prestige, it always ended so-so today , on the contrary, everyone talks only about victory, and to stand behind the price no one is going. what is a military victory in a modern confrontation with an unsuccessfully called hybrid , no one can fully formulate it, but i even mention the exit strategy is considered indecent adamant. it was an international review for the meeting.

we see with you the first document on the founding of odessa by the beginning of the 20th century, thanks to the generous favors of the russian emperors, odessa turned into one of the most comfortable cities in russia could never exist for three to four days up to 10,000 people. burning people in the house trade unions show the local population that the government is ready. it will end with only one, odessa

will cease to be obligated. we return to the news review ukrainian troops today in the morning conduct intensive shelling of donetsk under fire turned out to be petrovsky kiev kuibyshevsky district of the city they were hit by large-caliber artillery. this is reported by representatives of the dpr this morning also shelled gorlovka , the victims were not reported over the past day in the dpr, 62 shellings were recorded under fire, 12 settlements turned out to be guilty, if three people were killed. another was wounded, five more people were injured in donetsk and the ministry of defense published a video of the artillery units of the central military district in a red process the zone of the special operation, having received the coordinates of the target and the calculation of self-propelled artillery acacia and the multiple launch rocket system, are subjected to the position of the calculation.