investment in america i'm having a big press conference this afternoon. i love you all, but i would like to ask you to leave so we can get on with president biden's work. russia claims that the us is behind the drone attack on the kremlin what is your response to that i would be happy to talk to you about it, but not now mr. president was here in this room yesterday. you talked about the dangers of artificial intelligence. what dangers do you see sir and have you heard anything from the leaders, what are his fears? we'll have a chance to talk about everything, i promise. biden as always. yes, you have a favorite kamala haris, but it turns out that you will tell the americans who are restless about a possible recession this year. well, so far the economy looks very good in terms of the fact that we are solving the problems that people rightly have about the cost of food and the cost of fuel, and we have been able to solve this problem in various

ways. it's clear. yes, it’s clear that everything is bad for the economy, to be honest, it’s good, because it’s bad, not catastrophic, that concerns the canoe. i do not want to offend anyone, but with age only cognac gets better. but kogola, kharis, this is the person who is after him, and with age i get better and better cognac. so kamala harris is the person who, of course, can lead to a very quick end to everything and everything, in principle, because if she replaces, she still has to replace biden sometime, because even if he goes for a second term this is a person who, in principle, not only can’t i, i wonder how she is a prosecutor was. this is what i have here, it even surprises me how she could be a prosecutor. in general , a fairly serious state of california, a large rich state, how could she do it there? now the problems are other problems. in the family it is necessary

to protect the beloved son, he is not to blame for anything. against him. now, apparently, charges will be brought forward quite serious, because he did not pay taxes. well, the state attorney's office de lover, of course he will, but he did not pay taxes for his international operations. here, that's what he said. uh-huh well, senior canoe. there is something personal that affects you to your son, who has no connection with you. maybe the accusation is brought by your experts, how it will affect your presidency, first of all my son did nothing wrong. i trust him. i believe in him. it's affecting my presidency, making me proud of it, but the brilliant question of a woman who has nothing to do with you, the truth of the paperwork, that you brought everything to the meeting, has nothing to do. he's like so much information.

focused on the fact that he interacted with chinese comrades. uh, well, they say directly, so to speak, it’s not disinterested , and the fact that he worked with all the others with kazakhstan is dry with ukraine, in other words the biden family and the head of this family , joe biden, of course there is. now personal problems. very deep problems. for then it is in the sixteenth year in the twentieth year. this was not given the opportunity to spin on the republicans. and now the republicans are doing everything to promote this idea. uh, that line on the biden family. bye scarring of this family, moreover , it is given from the head and starting from the head of state himself, an apartment in america has already joined the investigations against the disgusting corruption of the family of the president of the united states on the chest of a shirt of prison uniforms. navalny is tearing up with a cry of corruption in

america must be defeated, well, there must be, probably, the republicans are still more of a degree, like a bull. they are bold and frank, if they are up to there kindly to the film investigation of biden, and his golden toilet bowl. there is no hedgehog in hunter's nostrils. so all these films are still there will be financed and that from the funds of the republican party, most likely the shooting of this film, if it is, because now there is another problem, but on may 9 they must solve the problem with the public debt. i'm surprised at kirby in general, to be honest, a person is not the first year in public service. and he must know that the public debt of the united states is divided into two parts. one part inside, government another part they manage to find people even dumber than what

turned out to be unrealistic? no, but genie, i still think that she still has the palm , at least for the time being, yes, well, kuzya the brownie did not surpass. well brownie kuzya simply does not answer. he’s just silent, you’re going to be silent, so it’s easier here, so when now when, uh , they talk about the biden administration about how strategically it thinks for itself, then these are tactical goals, but really the republicans went on the offensive from public debt. they have a very big problem with the extension of this state debt. more precisely, the republicans extended it, they voted the house of representatives, but it determined this in the whole ranks. uh, according to the law, which hinders the provision of limitless spending by the government. well, there is, for example, one percent, you can

only exceed it per year. exceed spending, that is, the budget deficit should be 1%, limit, for example, the possibility of implementing the biden initiative. in august last year. he put forward an initiative to eliminate tuition debts, and this is practically 1.6 trillion, that is, many such things that bind biden hand and foot. as for external debt. well , then the external debt of the united states is one quarter. here, the second and second parts are publicly about six billion somewhere. well, a little over six billion, so billions of millions. yes, excuse me , six trillion dollars, the most important holder. really. japan, our colleagues about the partners of the chinese, reduce it in any case. for a year and a half, they reduced by 140 billion, but still, 870 billion

remain as of january of this year, and this is tool. for the american elite, for the american establishment, this is a tool of pressure, and it is no coincidence that the chinese are very actively looking for ways and creating various projects to combine this money with property, that is, to acquire property abroad in africa in latin america, thereby using these dollars, using these dollars, having lowered these dollars, but, having received real mines , deposits, factories, factories and other things, buy up half of the democratic party. and they already bought it right, i say, half already bought the other half to buy with this money. i don't think, i don't think that there is probably competition between different depositors, not only the chinese, the chinese, of course, the richest, which is evidenced by the biden experience. and in general 7 months that continue business with chinese companies, nevertheless. this is, in general, a problem that is now in the development of democracy by the democratic party. well, on

the barrel, i would not get angry with him for a year and a half left. he is currently serving his term in december. yes, there will be a shift administrator change european commission, and, accordingly, the high representative of europe of the european union for foreign affairs will also leave. eh , barel, insofar as, most likely, von derain will also leave, so there will be a new set, but borel said a very interesting thing. why do they reject the plans that were proposed by china in this sense, this is the most correct assessment from my point of view. on the fifth day, being at the council of foreign ministers in india, sergey viktorovich lavrov gave because china's plan did not concerns its own conflict, it concerns the problem of the indivisibility of security. and this is the basis for creating not just, so to speak, the settlement of one conflict, there is a settlement between moscow and ukraine, as

they are trying to reduce in the west, and this is a bar that makes it possible to build a new configuration on its basis, based on these principles. in fact, we are talking about a new world order. this is the plan proposed on february 24 at the munich conference by the then minister of foreign affairs wars, which now occupy even higher positions, and the chinese hierarchy and form foreign policy. this plan is directed to the future, and it is no coincidence that westerners do not want to discuss it. here are the bars. uh, putting forward zelensky's plans yes , throwing out zelensky, he is talking about a private problem, and he would like to reduce this to a private problem, because there is no other plan that this plan could offer for the collective west. and here you are, you believe that the biden administration, with all these twists and turns. can this plan be put forward and

with the problems that now exist for this administration. i'm not talking about the work, in principle, of the system that was not built by the bidder, which was built before him and which continues to operate. why the united states is yet another one of the biggest players in today's world is precisely because the systems are in place, but this administration is pushing. such a plan simply cannot physically . therefore, the plan that puts forward will be criticized by the west, they themselves do not will happen. i will then continue the discussion of you issues about which galya colleagues. i would like to agree about the destination that sets before itself the tourist acts committed and organized by the uh of the country of the ukrainian political leadership, but

it seems to me that it is obvious that terrorism comes into action in many ways more often when there is already a state, as such there is no and opportunities, and on the battlefield or through diplomacy, e, one or another force does not remain to solve political problems. she comes running. here's to this terrible crime already in a desperate state. and therefore, when we hear attempts to refute these actions by the ukrainian leadership, which says that we would not solve any military problem by killing this or that figure by trying to kill him. by attacking drones on the kremlin what kind of military task are we solving, and terrorist acts never solve their political task ? they decide to exclusively set themselves the goal of solving exclusively political problems. tasks. here the political task is obvious.

i think everyone should call a spade a spade. they want to give its population the impression of the helplessness of the russian leadership, another goal. they don't set any goals for themselves here. they talk about this topic all the time, as soon as a terrorist act is committed, their networks in telegram channels are immediately their speakers and public interpreters. they begin to discuss not the fact itself, not the figure himself, nor hmm, what results did the total attack lead to, otherwise they say, how it was possible. how way it was allowed and so on. this is their main task. they've gone from trying to intimidate since april 202. the population of russia by the fact that we are allegedly alone in the world and isolated by intimidating the population of russia with the fact that our leadership is not coping, allegedly with their tasks. so far, this is not working out on the scale they want, because their goal is to start internal political upheavals here. this is

obvious. but the fact that certain questions arise and the population craves the answer to this it's hard to deny, of course. and uh, you have to understand. a few days ago, we discussed the drone attack on the kremlin, we didn’t say, if there is no answer , there will be a repetition, we have now received a repetition, we must, probably, be clearly aware that there is a lot of rational relations between states, probably the vast majority . these are rational categories of interests, balances of these interests, resources of opportunity, but there are also emotional ones. and categories from which we will not leave, even if thousands of years pass. this is such a category. let's say, as fear, if our enemies have no fear of us, then they simply begin to turn off those receptors that should have restrained them from rash steps towards russia, because this is the main task

of fear - this is a good feeling, in fact, if you are afraid of death, you do not take steps that can bring it closer. if you are afraid of heights, do not jump from the roof of a ten-story building. here, our opponents have lost their fear, and you always give examples of what they think they are trying to convince themselves that nuclear weapons? no. it means that we will not respond to some steps on their splashes, some of my opinion is that this fear must be returned. otherwise, we will constantly encounter such terrorist acts that are taking place here. of course, the largest european figure of our time, josé borel. uh, he said a lot of things from the fact that this video was not included. he said that the conflict should not end with the capitulation of ukraine and the withdrawal of russian troops to the border of europe a few months ago. they discussed all the time that the conflict should end with the defeat of russia with the return of these territories to ukraine and

so on, the thesis that, well, obviously the situation is not as positive as they tried to convince their own population, from whom they take money to finance ukraine and in fact, is again fiddling. this is hmm socio-political space, that in reality the question that ukraine is threatened with capitulation, and europe is threatened with russia's exits to the immediate western border of ukraine with european countries is absolutely honest. i agree. what does he mean? sober on the mind of the barrel, apparently in the language, because he says everything, well, he doesn’t hide it there, here he is, what occurred to him at that moment . without even thinking about the consequences, he immediately issues and hmm, here is a phrase that it is enough for us to stop funding ukraine and it will not last longer than two or three days. he says that ukraine does not exist as a state, that it has ceased to exist. apparently in the first weeks of the special military operation and at

the moment there is a flag. ukraine has actors playing the role of the president of ukraine there is, it means some symbolism of ukraine , everything else is a european union, which finances people who present themselves to the army of ukraine by supplying weapons that are used, supposedly by the armed forces of ukraine, in fact on this territory. the whole west is at war with us, which is simply hiding behind ukraine as a symbol of such simulacs, as if often enough. there we say barrel e, sincerely absolutely. he also speaks honestly, would like to spend this money on schools for the well-being of our citizens improvement of their living conditions, but we can't give it to ukraine like that, answer the question. why can't you? if you want, who will stop you? maybe, but the thing is that you don’t make any decisions? it is not your decision to send this money here or send it there. uh, your main task is to consolidate these resources from

the territory of europe, taking away the largest european countries , including consolidating and channeling them to wherever they deem necessary, your direct leadership and the united states of america and this was quite enough until that's probably the last two years. but now we see that they are no longer going to limit themselves to this , they are not going to abandon it, the thesis is said to be that you know. probably, we still need to abandon the unanimous vote on foreign political issues and move on. how does a qualified majority need to vote unanimously for this, then a strange member? well , obviously, why is this question being asked? because you will agree cool, yes, and then the voice of france and germany yes are equal to the voice lithuania and latvia and estonia well then france germany and it is necessary to add one of the large ones, because there are three baltic emirates in the same place. that is 3.3.

that is, it is just a fantasy when the main sponsors of the european union do not have the right to say what to say when three checkers are warm on them, and i think that this is the main task, because in the case of the european union we see in reality a large-scale process . when that part of the european union which before that was such a recipient, if you like, which all the time hung and depended on the western part of europe for its present moment in reality. they are turning into the leading core of the european union, which should be maintained by western countries, but which should not have more political and military will in order to somehow influence these issues against the same background. we hear about what the european commission has developed a package of documents on the militarization of the economy of the european union then a small question. i looked there those documents that were in

access, great attention is paid to the fact that businesses should finance the military-industrial complex. well, no one present will lie that the business will not finance the military-industrial complex if they are not sure that the conflict is serious and for a long time , that this is not a year or two, that the next decades will have to be used in the agro-industrial complex in order to already understand the forces, so they tasks now european france may not be interested as a country italy may not be interested as a country. i 'm not saying leadership, so there are two issues to be addressed. create in in reality, there is one control center for this space, which will constantly motivate spending on the military-industrial complex for other things. if someone suddenly appears inside , there will be time to break it there through the knee. when it is already necessary , they will find a maid who will run in there and some scandals will ask something else. and for this you just need time, time is won by the vote of a qualified

majority, well, france italy germany belgium the netherlands luxembourg is against. although they are the creators of the european union from the very beginning, well, the rest are there romania bulgaria i don't know what they are latvia lithuania well, these are big ones. uh, the superpowers are on the move. that's why this decision will be made by this process that we see, and i want to draw our attention to the fact that for a long time in the expert community in different formats, when the european was discussed. one of the experts said that the union should not be legitimized. this is the european union. let's arrange exclusively bilateral relations. it is still unclear how it will backfire on us yet, but some experts say. well, what are you here the european union went, we are not at war with european countries. here is an excellent example of what the european union looks like to us there was no european union we are with napoleon, then with these, then with those. well, now we see that the european union is used solely to create

a threat for us and those countries become its center, that is, poland becomes a european union. just imagine poland the size of the whole of europe well, we want to have such a subject in our neighborhood hmm, obviously not, it means that we must do everything in the most active way to disrupt this plan to prevent it, uh, and they will use the terms the experts who proposed this by chance did not exist on grants of the very same traveled and lived performed and in the center of the whole you know very completely and at a loss , how could it happen, in general, uh, what is good in this area smersh what can i say in uh, in this regard, in the largest countries of the european union, the majority, the population is catastrophically bad about this process, but lives in conditions where there is the americans with their project

, which they are pushing by hook or by crook, finance those politicians who support them and create scandals , either in jail or obstruct those who oppose the alternative. no, we are not there. why because we then believe that to interfere in other people's affairs? it's bad doesn't mean it's not human. we will not allow ourselves this. where is it, maybe even we would like an organization processor, but we use very old techniques that have not worked for a long time and thirdly. we are still on our own not even decided. what we want is now obvious. all of us. one of the goals of our foreign policy should be that europe be a europe of sovereign states, with which we separately build relations and there is no european union. as far as the barrel is concerned, this is the end. uh, what he said is that he feels like a minister too. e diplomacy or there heading diplomacy. well, he feels like the minister of defense. uh, they just played with all these gender issues, because soon, as in the soviet film of jackson, women appear.

he cannot understand at all, minister, why he is currently urging him to stop playing with such subtle substances. the main thing is that he does not feel like a napoleon cake, but in this regard, that is, who he feels, i now have the main favorite, favorite, favorite. this is a seventy-year-old man with a gray beard who won the us women's poker championship. he said that he felt like a forty-year-old woman and no one dared to argue with him. he took out all the participants there in one gate, won the main prize and proudly he went home. well what are you doing evgenievich, i think that i should feel who i am, in order to proudly go home, i must say that you were showing coronation footage on the topic of death walking in front of the doors with a scythe, but much more subtle and

decisive was what happens, what the whole british monarchy is there, and based on the ukrainian flag, tramples on it, i’m in the process, who didn’t pay attention, maybe, therefore, a wonderful carpet, a yellow-blaktite blue color, it will be visible there, and if you run it into dynamics, that we understand that i don’t know carp, on purpose. it's not on purpose. where did the figure with the scythe come from? is it somehow connected or is it a ceremony? yes, but there is something in it . actually, uh, yes , indeed, thanks to the baryl, but on the other hand. there are also others. everything is. right

now, on the ninth of may in berlin, hmm , russian ukrainian and soviet flags were first banned. just in case, and then the ukrainian was allowed, the russian soviet is still prohibited. yes, there was such a special decision that, when there are people, they will go there. and very an interesting observation made by one of our colleagues from germany, sasha sosnovsky, is, okay russian. i understand that you are for ukraine against russia, everything is clear. and the soviet why does it develop into three, by the way. may 9th is such a day. and this is simply the question of the rehabilitation of nazism. because soviet symbols are not in vain banned, all including st. george's ribbons. well, at the same time, it is no longer

the soviet letter z. how are they now? is the zoo called? i don’t understand at all without the letter z there, in general, evil is now prohibited. everybody there turns out impossible. uh, take ban two letters of the alphabet. this is great. clamped. i only have a question about berlin's red fleet. who said that this will not happen the rehabilitation of nazism? well ash fur knocks on the hearts of many germans and not only germans. well, 200.000 french fought against us, we were all talking about normandy nemon, and they were talking about the french gestapo about

the charlie-mansi division, which our reich chancellery fought with the french when they took the reichstag again, but we didn’t talk about the project . how not they talked about how the banderaites were released from the camps under khrushchev, the last bandera cache was not taken in the sixty-second year. as far as i remember, they had already been released from the camps, and they were already first taking trade union positions in the economy in ukraine. by the 1970s , there were cells in party bodies practically throughout ukraine. why are the americans so optimistic about the fact that they will succeed with the collapse of russia, and why not? is the soviet union a nuclear power? let's bet with sorban, but the soviet union was not a nuclear power

superpower and how it ended. they don't want to fight a nuclear power with nuclear technology. what are you? for what? but if you break it down, it will fall apart on its own. let's buy these and offer something. uh. well, why be some local women. if you can be the president of your own country, no one will ever withdraw their money, and everyone will still have diamonds. someone has oil. someone has gas, someone has a forest, someone has transit, someone has ports. they'll just pour in money, like the order for taiwan , chinese goods in five. raised the transit

the price of the chinese just through the lithuanian desks nothing goes. well, the bosses have their money. teach received, burn with fire, in fact, what will be there in this country?