the regime to the teeth to arrange an economic collapse, in fact, throughout europe and in the world and shouting at all corners about moscow's aggression , there are enough examples of this kind. or, let's say, how to understand the american pearl about recognizing only one china on the one hand, and on the other, and maintaining diplomatic military relations with taiwan almost as a sovereign state is very simple in this case, the americans say. we are so comfortable. this fits into their concept of containing the growing power of the people's republic of china, and the rest is indifferent to them, what is called in a drum, in fact it is impudence cynicism, erected into the american foreign policy doctrine. today it would be nice to remember something else. and how many soviet missiles were enough for the united states to create a global psychosis during the cuban missile crisis? on the one hand, and on the other. how many weapons were

brought to our borders in a short time in the territories controlled by nato today? the question is who then really brings the world closer to the apocalypse. today we are conducting a special military operation for the sake of protecting its sovereignty and territorial integrity, the safety of millions of citizens. it is obvious that a full-scale, hybrid war of our enemies has been unleashed against our country; their american and european patrons are intensively pumping lethal weapons of all kinds, encouraging terror in the border regions of russia, committing sabotage. political assassinations actually lead to the third world war, a global catastrophe, in which, as you know , there can be no winners by definition. i once said that the law is not my judge. a judge it is the speaking law in modern

man. often perceives rights through the prism of justice. however, western countries seek to turn international justice into a control tool for reprisals against objectionable states and people. despite the fact that they themselves are not subject to jurisdiction it would be nice to remember how the structures of international justice reacted to each of the aggressions of the united states of america in different parts of the world over the past 70 years. these examples are almost non-existent. and here is how some international judicial quasi-judicial bodies behave now, when, in any even the most obvious case, they stubbornly take up anti-russian positions, even if this contradicts the applicable law in the circumstances of the case. yes, elementary logicians reshape the plot of court cases in favor of primitive propaganda, do they justify turning a blind eye to the most heinous crimes committed by the kiev regime against their own country? take that

small intelligible international criminal court. which we, not americans, do not consider how legitimate for their countries and citizens. nobody needs the powerless structure, as you know, was created on the basis of the rome statute , in which the largest countries do not participate, if these countries did not recognize it, then this body initially turned into a marginal one, that is, obviously useless for them. this is such a bunch of legal impotents. the international criminal court was able to bring to justice only a couple of minor political figures from small countries, and those, of course, stayed at home, and finally he signed his own verdict, ignoring

the crime of the united states and afghanistan, but the finest hour struck at this particular court today, at the insistent order of the united states, they are trying to persecute russia and its top officials , of course, there is nothing to be surprised here, since the one who pays is the one who orders the well-known music, but about what kind of justice one can speak if the us , which is not a party to the rome statute, nevertheless, in fact openly pumps the international criminal court with finances, hardware and software resources. he doesn't even hide what he's doing. this for the sake of their consideration of specific anti-russian cases, let me remind you that this year the general budget. e of this special court. increased by 24 million euros, you can do whatever you want. this is, of course, considered, but, in fact. it looks like a bribe from the american authorities, which was issued specifically for anti-russian cases related to the conflict in ukraine. it is not surprising that this overly biased court took the risk of taking against russia. such

a legal attack, of course, is demonstrative senseless, pathetic, even in some ways unfortunately it has some consequences. what are they and that it finally undermines the confidence of the world community in international judicial bodies, there are many examples of how western-controlled national justice bodies are confidently moving towards an inglorious end. here are independent journalistic investigations that uncovered a connection between dozens of judges of the european court of human rights and the open society foundation of a well-known american billionaire. 100 times for many years these judges literally ate from his hand and under dictation biased court verdicts were stamped from across the ocean, which, by the way, have not been reviewed even after corruption scandals of this kind, some courage was tried to be shown by the dispute resolution body of the world trade organization made

several decisions that were unfavorable for us foreign trade then the united states without unnecessary ceremonies simply blocked the activity of this legal structure, making it impossible to appoint new members of the appeals body, and it ruled in relation to different countries with regard to our country, he endured, but we were loyal to this. the americans blocked this way, international economic justice also became a pure fiction. in words, freedom and competition are proclaimed; in fact, no one and nothing prevents strong and rich countries from defending their interests in any way, but for other countries, discriminatory prohibitions are established. in the same row , illegal predatory measures in relation to the property of the russian state of russian companies of russian individuals confiscation of the property of our diplomatic missions and individual citizens. well, no, there are other examples

of investigations, such as the explosion of the nord stream pipeline. what is russia accused of? whose rights are actually violated to a large extent, despite the obvious facts that are involved, which indicate the involvement of radical groups in this? european countries, as ordered, forgot about their obligations, which are defined in the convention on the law of the sea a and the convention against terrorist bombing. we of course we will continue to use all available legal instruments to bring the perpetrators to justice, but the chances of doing this on the platforms of international judicial bodies are negligible. why am i talking about this to everyone? i am confident that it is in our power to change this reality, however, universal remedies. now they hardly work. even such excellent postulates in all respects, which were enshrined in the declaration on the principles of international

law, adopted by the general assembly more than 50 years ago. russia has repeatedly reaffirmed its fidelity to the spirit and letter of the charter of the united nations and the founding documents arising from it. for us, the need to comply with them is in the interests of all mankind. this is a basic approach, we adhere to it and today, despite the fact that we are constantly faced with lies with bias, pressure and unfriendly actions of the countries of the collective west, as it was, for example, with the minsk agreements with the notorious theme of nato expansion to the east with unfair competition under the brand of climate change agendas and other similar steps. our patience is not endless for any compromises, there are limits beyond which there is a threat to security and sovereignty. you and i understand perfectly well, everyone who is present here in this hall, since all my lawyers, that if

legal institutions do not work, others come to replace them. effective capable of expressing the will of a particular state, and not the will of a number of countries, there is no reason to obey the decisions of legal structures that have outlived themselves or completely discredited, and if international conventions do not apply. and the decisions of the courts recognized as strange are not executed, then the cannon and rocket artillery work, and even hypersonic missiles fly. international law will be transformed in the near future in accordance with new devices. in any case, we are sure that the old order has outlived its usefulness; it is being replaced by a sad multipolar system of relations between states. in general, for international

law. output of the current period. much more efficient now. than classical international law, which has been conducting its own report since the time of the yusgenz, bilateral and bloc agreements have been working. cooperation is also developing, which they do not want to live at the behest of the west and its rotten institutions. these are new centers of power that are clearly expressing their will to protect their own interests and, at the same time, are tuned not to confrontation, but to an equal , respectful long-term dialogue, one of the key participants in such a dialogue is our country. against the background of the crisis of international law, the development of legal the foundations of an interstate agreement within the framework of regional organizations such as the brix sco. the eurasian economic union is a union state with belarus, various associations of our friends of the states of the middle

east, asia, africa with which partnership relations are growing in russia, precisely such integration formats. they are the notorious seven. today they unite most of the world's population. well, it is they who produce the largest volume of the world's gross product. a separate particularly important task is to improve the legal framework related to the use of digital content and digital technologies is the problem of digital sovereignty in the modern world. one of the most important is that foreign digital platforms that we all use to a large extent and western platforms do not stop as an instrument of interference in the internal affairs of the state and are not used to encroach on their sovereignty and traditional values. in this sense, a necessary universal international treaty that would streamline the behavior of countries in the digital space within the framework of the working un open-ended groups russia presented a draft of the relevant document

on ensuring international information security. these are the main conclusions that can be drawn from what i have just tried to convey to you. so what to actually do. in the future, i will now name these conclusions, they do not claim to be absolute, but nevertheless, uh, i will share with you. and the first is obvious that the current system of international human rights justice in criminal cases, and in many respects even in civil cases itself exhausted. it is not relevant and unfair, the second major world platforms, such as the international criminal court of the european court of human rights. yes, and even the international court, it has lost its appeal is not recognized by countries. as fair and useful, since they are dominated by individual states and groups of states, the third.

it will not be possible to create new institutions like the above named in the coming years, since the contradictions that are tearing apart the world community are too great to create them, a common world concentration. recall that in the field of criminal justice. he was truly achieved with only one death. however, both now and in the future, to achieve such unanimity. in any case, in the near future it will be almost impossible to imagine that the world's largest players would agree to this. especially taking into account the sad experience of recent times, the fourth is much, more relevant, and the creation of resection bodies on the basis of regional international organizations. they are already working in international economic

associations of individual countries and in our country in the eurasian economic union and in asia it is possible that in the future similar bodies may appear in the sco and in other regional associations where they do not currently exist . in creating this new system of international justice, we must take into account the lessons of the past, it is out of the question for the international courts themselves to actually determine their own competence. how shamelessly did the echr, international investment tribunals and other similar structures that tarnished their reputation, which then invented cases for themselves to increase their own significance and justify their multimillion-dollar costly existence, serving the interests of a group of westerners. it is really very convenient when you are your own legislator and the court and lawyers, the prosecutor, and for each of your functions you are also paid money. the competence of the new

structures should be directly defined and fixed by ratified international treaties, which in this parts cannot be broadly interpreted by any legal human laws , the situation can not be explained when the state signs this agreement, understands it quite, in a certain way, interprets this agreement literally, and then after a few years. it turns out that obligations under the contract from the first application without the express consent of the parties are expanded due to all sorts of abstruse judicial interpretation. after all , this is exactly what happened with the european convention on human rights there is an investment protection agreement with other conventions. for them, for these methods, new meanings are specially created, in fact. let's say a new meaning is cut out from the formulas from which it did not exist and does not exist, various scientific names

for determining the type of judicial activism of evolutionary interpretation and other various nonsense are invented, but in fact this can be called a very simple word. this is pure scam. and fraud in the literal sense of the word. this is a scam and a breach of trust. no matter how well-intentioned such actions may be justified by the international courts for the protection of human rights, a whole parasitic network of consultants has been entangled, who feed on a percentage of the amounts awarded. another example, which, by the way, before our eyes, developed in any case on theirs and all this , so to speak, was either reported to me, or i even prepared some materials on them with the help of fabricated artificial lawsuits in investment arbitration from deficit budgets, developing countries billions are pumped out by western corporations, but

the irony is that it was originally conceived as a tool to protect western capital investments in countries in need of investment. these legal mechanisms are like frankenstein. turned against their creators and that is exactly what happened with the memorable energy charter. even 10 years ago, it was used as an instrument of financial pressure on objectionable countries. however, after a series of lawsuits with reference to the same charter, but already against the government of western europe, including in connection with the green agenda, they are in a panic. here these western countries began one after another to announce their withdrawal from this treaty. and if france, germany, the netherlands, spain , others saw a threat to their energy sovereignty, then this happened only now, our country withdrew the signature on the card back in 2009. one does not have

to be a prophet to predict the unenviable fate of other international treaties , in which we are now suspending and terminating. it's just that it will take time for many countries to realize the futility of those that have already degraded, including through the fault of various kind of international tribunals legal mechanisms. let's say, right there and the road with this legal mechanism is the sixth universal platform in criminal proceedings in the coming decades, it is unlikely that there will be too much distrust between states and strong country conflicts to create a real, i emphasize real, constantly operating court in certain categories of criminal cases, but a useless international the criminal court will quietly rot and die from its lack of demand. and in general, such structures, if speaking, directly contradict the modern understanding of state sovereignty will have to defend it for a long time not in courtrooms. but

alas, on the battlefield, or at best during negotiations? and from here the seventh priority remains with the decisions of national courts, and here until it works, the updated system of international treaties regulating cross-border judicial interaction will come in handy for us, well known since biblical times, the principle of reciprocity known as an eye for an eye or the principle of talion. what does it mean if russian business and citizens are being harassed and discriminate in this or that country, its residents have nothing to expect a different attitude towards themselves in russia, including in the field of legal proceedings for the execution of judgments and penalties in our legal doctrine and legislation, modern tools were created for this war of jurisdiction, which, of course, we did not declare , moreover, in recent years, based on their own constitution, legal traditions. we have significantly

strengthened the domestic judicial system and national arbitration mechanisms . let's work tirelessly called together with friendly powers to work in this direction and further. well, and finally, the seventh, it is obvious that some states, such as the united states, some of its most rabid adherents, will continue to contradict the principles of international law and try to extend their national jurisdiction to foreign states. as well as foreign individuals and legal entities, let's face it, this cannot be tolerated further. and the entire civilized world community must fight this, no matter how difficult it may be. dear colleagues dear friends a little bit of passion caught up here , not everything is so sad. here, in this hall , russian lawyers, our comrades, have gathered,

who represent countries that are friendly to us , and here are our relations. they are really built on trust, and adherence to the principles of sovereign equality allows us to fully take into account the interests of our states and preserve their national identity, support and strengthen each other and find mutually beneficial compromises. we need to complete the construction of a multipolar system of world order, in which sovereignty of the state is of key importance and of particular value, and vice versa, it makes no sense for us to deal with politically dependent state puppets. thank you here are those states that, after any shout from their masters, are ready to turn 180 degrees, we emphasize 180. not to be confused with a 360-degree turn, following

the well-known doctrine of the minister of foreign affairs. anna lena beerbock. so, we know how much is. russia has always advocated and will continue to advocate for implementation of the principle of sovereign equality in international relations must act for this message. only our coordinated actions will make it possible to finally establish the world order, which is based not on force, but on justice on the triumph of law, in order to reaffirm faith in the true values ​​of international law. thank you for your attention. thanks dmitry anatolyevich, but i think that now we will talk about that optimistic finale of your introductory part. now i have a question for the representative

of india, mr. eh, rostock, of course judicial branch. she cannot remain aloof from, uh, what is happening inside the state and from the point of view of sovereignty is right, this is how the supreme court of india and in general all judicial practice contributes to strengthening state sovereignty in this matter. no place. good afternoon namastevich. thank you i. uh, i wish you all the very best, and i send my regards to all of our country dear members.

goodbye. it's hard for me to pronounce all the names correctly. hello iran security council chairman

i will just express my opinion for me most of the time to speak at the eleventh st. petersburg legal forum and i would like to demonstrate india's view of sovereignty right, taking into account the general context of international law, is a fundamental characteristic of any nation, and this understanding certainly has a relationship with international e international transport. on two positions, firstly, any state can protect itself from non-interference from other countries, and this happens within

the borders of one state, and this, as well, corresponds to the protection of the rights of citizens of this country and the rule of law the constitution of india is an illustrative example of these concepts. when the constitution was adopted, it was after the second world war and at the same time the preparation of the constitution and the work was developed. for example, according to the declaration of human rights. it was a parallel process. and all topical issues were actively discussed and, for example, in india, he left the issue. is it worth it to include all these legal norms and concepts in the constitution of the country, we all perfectly understand that the constitution should reflect current issues, but at the same time take into account

interests. ah, the citizens of the country. she is meeting the national opposition. and we said that india is a state, and we stand on the position of freedom, equality and fraternity, in addition to this constitution of a sovereign state. india this document included a number of provisions that declare different. questions that are specific to the indian context, india is the largest democratic country in the world and uh, the constitution of india is a document. and now

more than billions live in this state people, and we are well aware of how important it is to protect the fundamental rights of all citizens. and this is equality, protection of freedom of speech , respect. uh, and as well as human freedoms and , uh, everything. it's included in the constitution of india because it's a fundamental principle, because it's all about the dignity and freedom of the citizens of india, if we say not networks and major couples, then of course. the following aspects must be taken into account, for example, the state cannot discriminate against citizens on the basis of racial religious sexual and

other affiliation and absolutely all citizens should receive legal protection also the state cannot restrict freedom of speech and expression or threats to public order should be protected in this way, and we understand that we are talking about such a delicate balance that should be ensured between these two provisions. constitution and at the same time, uh , it is also indicated there that an independent judiciary is being created. and this power has the authority to interpret constitutional law. but at the same time, we defend all the provisions

we protect everything in the constitution, including the constitutional rights of citizens. we not only protect, uh, sovereignty, but the rights of citizenship, but we also emphasize that we support legal norms and freedoms in the highest eform. third. in the same year, the structure of the supreme council of the main values ​​​​was adopted.