[000:00:00;00] uh, instances, of course, it seems to me that the sanctions club, we should fall into the truth against the authors of imposing sanctions and demand compensation for damages correctly to their idea, they said that the americans, of course, have huge influence of these bodies, but still less. it seems to me that as far as our argumentation is clear and convincing, they are also forced to vote. you know, yes , recently the islamic republic against the americans, and we were able to achieve justice and in fact, so i think that we can use this opportunity. and about their unilateral actions and

defeat them. thank you very much. all other sanctions by their nature, as mr. archimedes just said, they are generally illegitimate. so we don't recognize them. and wounds are not recognized by other countries that have subjected them to sanctions pressure, they are not recognized, and there are already many of us. and if we have a lot, then we represent a certain force, we must fight together. i absolutely support the proposal of the minister of justice of iran to the experience of

egypt mr. marwa, how rebuilt the legal vector of the country's development, given that now there is a course for society to e-e a new large social, for example, the first and foremost role of citizens is certainly significant here, this is also about security. tell us about your country's experience. dear friends, dear participants, let me at the beginning express my gratitude, their gratitude for everyone , faith is now living since

2013, egypt is living through a period of changes. the ussr , the inhabitants of our country support the changes that are taking place in our country. bim-kuli, then this is all e needs of society needs of the egyptian people to a new level egypt has become a country that has sovereignty is an absolutely civil

party to the law of practice. this country and the use of laws in order to avoid possible upheavals and

misunderstandings. we really want is a state. in principle, he adheres to the neutrality of the citizens of our country, however , we must admit that he is observing

a study. sentences like this transition is very important in order to achieve stability when stability will be achieved. then we will be able to talk about the formation of new, social, economic laws, and so on and so forth. uh, new laws, uh, that will be in line with the new 2014 constitution.

we make laws in the economic environment of the political environment. economic laws had to answer. uh, parts of society, uh, had to support, uh, support disabled women, and now a woman has received all her constitutional rights on an equal basis with a man. now even now a woman should be accepted to any public position, including judicial positions and other positions.

on par with a man when it comes to people with disabilities, and now people with disabilities have a law that represents their interests, when it comes to politics. naturally, we have adopted new laws regulating as well the presidential and general elections. in addition, we formed a new national level to regulate my process.

2014, we have a full-fledged system for ensuring human rights, we provide an appropriate legislative climate in order to pass laws and in order to create new personnel who could ensure the implementation of those laws that are adopted in the field of human rights and these organizations. we provide submission of all necessary reports.

that at the internal level they are applied, uh, are applied in a better way than before, as well as in terms of international agreements on this egypt, uh, respects all international agreements respects the sovereignty and all other states respects the principles of its participation in all international organizations. thank you very briefly. one question , mr. warman clarified that now a woman can hold leading positions in government. yes. yes, women can hold leading positions in government bodies , but have they already held many positions? as a woman, it is not clear, but in your speech you

specified that now a woman is holding positions in the governing bodies of power. this is a good question. we have 25 percent in the government. representatives are represented in the government. now the number of women reached 25% of the government, in addition, uh woman. now occupies. uh, the post of governor. and there was never such a vice-governor. in 2013, there was no such thing. now a woman holding positions in the system of the prosecutor general's office such was not before 2013

a woman. in the life of a woman, there was no such thing for a year, it all became. uh, perhaps thanks to those thanks to the changes that took place before after 2013. thanks , he not only can do it, but he does it anyway. let's now move on in another topic to the sensational decision of the international criminal court and certainly the issue of sovereignty and immunities of officials is higher. they are very clearly manifested in international criminal justice, and mr. petrovich i have a question for you. could you, as a practicing lawyer, tell us about your experience in this

area. all i want to offer. anatolyevich ivanov and you personally with god will feel the opportunity today to hear the serbian language of one small clan, machine tool, i greet all participants with great pleasure. today i had to hear. uh, all the discus at the main his after the work of recent years the international concerns the work of the international court, as it was called the international court, that is, a very

poor application of international law. and it's a shame the collusion that is being carried out with their open space. the unfortunate gaga tribunal to the bukhara tribunal began with the formed rules that the original globalism recreated by applying, namely, the following international law supports me of liberal globalism. she will be respected will not support interests. they will be on

place. when it comes to american globalism, where norms stop and rules are applied, uh, justice ends, justice ends there. no different. he

set up a court that supposedly. a-a pure legend about the real purpose of the establishment and work of the gas tribunal was the judicial confiscation of the forcibly established situation on the territory of the non- liberal principle of the united states

of america in the balkans, civil or religious war, as a meter, the destruction of the people who died and i was engaged in this purpose and i can tell you, i can, please, unfortunately say, unfortunately for my people and my state. they did this for this task. from this i would switch to the connection with the international criminal ones, which were established in 2001 by the rome statute and

the international criminal court took upon itself the deformation and pushing of the international tribunal for the former yugoslavia to see even now, roughly speaking. criminal court the international criminal court was supposed to be a national institution that would be specially respected. everything, in principle, international criminal law. however , the thirteenth year of 2013, in the period of e 13 years of existence, there was a trial

on the issue of problems in african countries, then between us, which there were metal. and many other factors of the court, which is pressed under the pressure of the day of liberal globalism and is under its direct control , calls into question the existence of the court itself

. we ask the question, so we asked the government of serbia the rome statute. can serbia next to saturn there roman many countries did this south african republic, forward 2019 to ten fifteenth year due to problems

that was ordered by e-e courts by the president. they refused to extradite this president.

it is clear that the russians recognize the existence of this court and such a legal fact, this is a political act, this is a difflex legal act, and we all know this, a provocation of one kind, a provocation of russia in relation to russia is one serious pressure small countries that have signed the work of the international criminal court on the site of the territory. why if anyone territories this other side should

arrest? simply in the morning not to respect the constitution, internal and international law, thereby there is pressure on those countries i listen to, whose faces are, and here we are talking about the russian federation, there is no possibility of any legal consequences and in relation to russia at one moment all countries that signed this city in that the majority of the revision of their decisions

and respect is great now all the representatives of all countries here have outlined the positions of how the issue of legal sovereignty in states is developing today. e, dmitry anatolyevich and here, what prospects do you see for further strengthening the legal sovereignty of our country even in your speech. you painted such a rather gloomy picture of international law. that is , it turns out that now we must fully concentrate on how to build national legislation and this is how russian legal proceedings turn out. well, and i think that we will quietly finish, so just a forbidding word, please. yes, thank you very much, and thank you very much. picture, but in general i am an optimistic person, and sometimes you just need to exaggerate so that everyone feels

the drama of the situation, otherwise they don’t get it. here, in fact, is indeed international law . in a certain sense, it is in decline, and the system of international justice has degraded and there are examples of this. that's just that mr. petrovich brought much more to them, but this does not mean that we should abandon international law, because. e, this is the most important tool for communication between countries, the experience accumulated since the advent of roman law the peoples or yuzgen people who mentioned today 's speech indicates that this is an important positive experience, but the main thing is that it should still be a law that is based on e , the common will of the peoples. that it act not selectively in the interests of one side, but that it act in the interests of all countries exactly in this. now the main threshold

of the current system of international law is the selective nature of the dictates of individual countries or groups of countries. it was not for nothing that i followed this line from the moment of the collapse of the soviet union. and when the individual states of their blocs felt like winners, and as soon as the winners appear , international law ends, the dictation begins, but it is in our power to change all this if a normal modern world order appears. we do not need to lock ourselves in national apartments. we certainly need to improve our national legislation, but to develop its own national judicial system. but this does not mean that international institutions should die out. and what is generally impossible, uh, justice, uh, which is carried out by international and resection instances. but this should be fair justice, and not the kind that our colleague just talked about, if you

will allow me, i will say a few words about what i heard. i’m here not for nothing, some notes, but in fact many thanks to all colleagues for participation for your interesting e speeches hmm, it means that it's nice when we look at the same way, the resolution of certain problems or conflicts that arise between national legislation, a and international law. here is mr. ajay ragi, as a judge of the supreme court of india, said that the general principle that applies e in india and based on legislation on laws and based on their judicial precedents is that if in india there are relevant rulings of national law on this subject, then it applied. and if not, then in this case international law can

also be taken into account, but this is only part of the position, and the second part of the position is that even if there is no national legislation of national regulations on this topic and there is not even a specific judicial precedent in the countries of anglo-saxon law. it is also necessary to establish how much the spirit of those norms of international law, which in this case is to be applied, corresponds to the foundations of the national system. and this is a very delicate legal work. when comparisons are no longer specific norms or gaps are filled in, when in general, so to speak, the question arises whether this corresponds to the traditions of the country? does this right answer him standing? will the people of the country accept it? and it's very thin too. indeed, we have recently also changed our legislation in this regard, after the adoption of the new version of the constitution, our dear colleague from indonesia

, mr. lauli, spoke about issues of national sovereignty. e question for how it is interpreted. eh means uh. uh, that means how they understand these issues, including in terms of improving legislation, including, uh, criminal law. eh, and so, i noted this for myself. this is , in general, probably a sensible story, which can even be learned from the fact that some short stories have delayed entry into force, for example, the criminal code. there it is introduced 3 years after the adoption. uh, it gives the judiciary a chance to prepare. it's quite wise and uh, i think it's a very sensible decision especially. taking into account the fact that er the former penal code was taken from holland indonesia holland - these are different countries and traditions are different, so it's

really a very interesting experience. e akmal-khalmatovich saidov talked about how the constitutional process is developing in uzbekistan, he talked about how sovereignty is understood in the scientific sense in the torinal, that is, sense and at the level of politics. uh, so i absolutely agree with all of this thank you for these comments, but i would also like to note that sovereignty in addition to sovereignty state sovereignty is entitled to the sovereignty of peoples. it can be subdivided into true and imaginary, so a number of very large states have all the signs of a state of people , a territory, a large colossal economy, no. federal federal republic