the movement somewhere is the support of the opposition forces, somewhere the destabilization of the internal political situation , there are a variety of ways for this, and e. of course, i would be glad if we lived in a world in which everyone respects the internal affairs of states, their sovereignty and, in accordance with the norms of international law , do not interfere inside. but we do not live in this world again. moreover, i do not want to upset anyone, but i do not know of these norms of international law there, maybe one or two still somehow function. everything else is absolutely obvious that at the moment, at least, it has no functionality , and therefore, if we compete in such hmm and competitions in which our opponent allows himself everything, and we allow ourselves. only there is one kind of martial arts, we allow ourselves only one line of behavior. that is, of course, to win. we can't do that. it's not a matter of choice. it's not a matter of fantasy or what would be good if we were like the good old days it's an absolute must

if we want to get results i'm very i want to visit khitrovka khitrovka is not only beggars. sing along. hiding there, fugitives like rejection bandits and murderers creepy place, what's wrong with it? i'm thinking about who could have killed him, if you wouldn't be an investigator. yes, he is undesirable with me, otherwise the suit will have to be forgotten, do not even hope. so easy. you won't get rid of me.

we watch to know everything about russia , we watch the best historical series for free without registration.

the second thing i would like to draw attention to is one of the brightest representatives of the political establishment of the european union josé borel made three statements to which i would like to draw attention. first statement. he says, the next one says hmm uh, you know politically we are very different from the european union and china because we are a multi-party democracy and china is a one-party state. why do i want to touch this statement? well, it seems to be related to china , first of all, ours. uh, the so-called

frightened patriots there and so on. uh, so our fifth column immediately usually grabs these manuals and starts untwist it with it’s clear, first with respect to china, then 100%, it will go to russia now, drop this and go to russia that we are a lot of guys, so i want to touch on these issues right away, because, firstly, china is not one party states. there are nine officially registered. if you go the formal way, it's just to count how many parties , who can it be then mr. barrel will explain how in 2005-2009, 2013 and 2017 the same woman from the same party became the chancellor of germany, who put it there, uh, put it forward, or he will explain, how four times in a row portugal the same party formed the government in japan from the fifty-fifth year, only twice from ninety-three to 94 from 2009 to 2012 , the government was formed not by

the liberal democratic party, moreover, the european the people's party, which makes up the majority in the european parliament , has been it since 1999 and does not change at all, therefore, if he means, not what is formally, one registered party and that's it. but the fact that there is a dominant party that wins exactly the same picture in the country all the time, then he needs to familiarize himself with this terminology. and based on e, that means the key criteria for the party systems of the dominant party in europe, there are quite a lot of them. and therefore, probably, these theses are not very relevant in this case, but what i would like in this connection, maybe even pay more attention. this is an informal approach. and just informative, he simply does not understand that china is not a parliamentary republic, so however, as most european

politicians do not understand, that the whole world does not consist of presidential parliamentary and mixed republics of constitutional and absolute monarchies, that this is an exclusively european vision of their own political systems, which, when trying to pull them on the rest of the globe, does not hold water. because there are a large number of constitutional monarchies in the middle east where the head they are called constitutional, but at the same time the monarchy is both the prime minister and the finance minister and minister of defense and head of the central bank. let's say, well, the minister of foreign affairs at the same time, so here are the attempts. here are such meaningless tensions. and this is especially important for us. here, china has chosen a path for itself, where the main supreme bodies are the chinese people's congress, and this is not a parliament, it is formed in a completely different way. for some reason, since the nineties, a lot of time has already passed , we believe that this is exactly the model of

parliamentarism and the party system and the political system that was inscribed then, it is clear under what conditions and it is clear for what purpose? i just want to remind you that most of the european countries that have similar models, that have similar, well, these are the countries that lost in world war ii, italy that you mentioned, uh, and most of the parliamentary republics of the old world is a state that has a constitution that is designed so that they could not find a serious leader. yes, occupied countries. therefore, the question arises here. here is such a theoretical whether russia had objective conditions that existed in western countries and led to the emergence of parties and party systems of this type in russia there were no these objective conditions and economy. relations historically developed in a completely different way, the country developed in a completely different way, there were no movements that were there. therefore, the objective side of the issue disappears from the subjectivity associated with culture. western culture, catholic

culture. it is all built on the idea of ​​division, division into secular and spiritual authorities in orthodoxy, there should be a symphony and harmony of these authorities, division the church itself to an infinite number of guild orders, and so on. this is not typical for the orthodox church, but the result of one is the emergence of parties, and in another case, we, i will honestly tell the population. if you ask directly, uh, i 'll say it on behalf of the population. which party does alexander mikhailovich represent, which party does general gulev and others represent , it may not even be possible to immediately answer this question. they know it's a military man. this is a powerful economist. this man is a doctor, this man is a professor. why because it the principle of catholicity is very characteristic of our culture and the principle of such class representation. if you like, because the population. so what have you done in your life to go today to the deputies of this issue is not worth it in italy let's say? i didn't do anything. i am a professional politician in russia, it is clear how professional politicians are perceived, finally, and two more theses, about which

i am talking, just to think about what our political system might be like. it is in dynamics if we culturally, we return to the origins of our civilization, then, probably, the political system will catch up with these changes. barrel also said two more things, and she 'll finish it alone. he said another problem is that we are a free market. and in china, in china, the role of the state in the economy has somehow increased. this is said by a person who is in a situation where not only the role of the state is high in the economy, but there is a need for national education, which has not been formed anywhere so far. unclear. how do these people get their positions. what kind of political or gaga mechanism exists here and this structure , let's say, can launch such a thing as the common agricultural policy of the european union when there are some

subsidizing others forbidding to carry something. it is above the national association that is doing this and it is quite obvious that the territory of the european union is not a free market, and finally, a limited economy with the eleventh package of economic sanctions and, in conclusion, a phrase that first shocked me, and then in principle, i realized that, again, josep. barel does not deceive us. he said we don't want ukraine to become belarus . first of all, i think, first of all, how far the person in charge of european diplomacy should be from any diplomatic etiquette. what is afford? and then i realized that he apparently means they do not want ukraine to be stable. a state that has preserved its own industry, economy, traditions, culture and fraternal relations with russia. they honestly said, we do not want ukraine to was like that. i thought about what you probably know most

of the very many completely innocent citizens of ukraine who today are simply amazed at what their uh state has become since 2014. they would dream that ukraine was belarus and they would dream that they had this model of relationship. and this should simply become a lesson for many leaders in the soviet countries and for the population of many post-soviet countries that they do not want any of you to you were independent independent, retained your own economy industry industry economy state with stupid relations with russia what is the main policy and the main task in your attitude is precisely this. i ask you, right on the transmission , a new direction in the science of barrel logy is emerging. yes, if you look at the barrel from one side of the atlantic, that is, from ours, i agree with what genna tigranovich said. well, if you look to escape from the other side of the atlantic , then the barrel is very consistent in the same

performance. and this is the result of an informal meetings. uh, the heads of the species of the european union of the member countries of the european union barrel voiced a very important thing there strategic tasks strategic security problems of the european union is the conflict in ukraine and china well, the conflict in ukraine, i understand, it still borders on the european union here it can be understood, but china and here, if you look at the barrel, here from the other side of the atlantic he completely fell a very clear task. he closes the perimeter closes the perimeter, given that the european union has begun gradually get involved in the confrontation with china, and this is the main partner of the european union, china and therefore, breaking ties with china is the same as we had , they were tearing them alive, it will be even worse there, but there are certain orders

, political orders from the main disconnected states, despite what kind of afghan administration was there, but they are building a perimeter and this perimeter needs to be closed to the european union, the european union, should quarrel with china, this will be dedicated. here next week themselves, uh, sevens where the europeans will convince and i think that they will also adopt a declaration on the fight against china because this is a very significant issue for the united states. remember, no matter how trump is, no matter how we treat him, but in december of the seventeenth year, the national security strategy was two existential threats to the united states of russia and china, and from that moment they begin to put pressure on the european union, the european union wants it. the european union does not want this, but it will close it in so far as the americans line on that at the same time now the construction

of the perimeter and already begin to suffocate those who got inside. right now , very important for us, in principle, presidential elections are taking place today. this is the first round. most likely there will be a second one in 2 weeks. yes indeed, i can't say that we haven't decided. yes, russia somehow played along and erdogan with this grain deal, we played along with erdogan, and then, when something happens there, a certain fake appears, and the kursk workers' party, and kurt, that support? right here. uh, the leader of the opposition says that this is the hand of moscow and you can’t interfere there, though the erdogan speaks in the words of a pike somewhere, he was aiming from a bow, of course, a strong blow about this. we don’t play along with this. we act simply in our interests, we act in our interests, but it would be better in our interests not to build relations so that erdogan remains. it must be admitted one way

or another, no matter how he behaves, but it is better for our interests to work with a convenient person, which has already defined its relationship with the european union and the united states. rather than a cattle sack, which is the other way around now, american diplomacy, thank god now they are talking about andy sherman leaving. so there will be no diplomacy at all in the state department. and this means it will be even worse, which means it will be by any means, thank you. god sherman is leaving, so it will be that nothing is worse, that there will be no diplomacy. it will be better for us. it's best that americans won't have diplomacy. here in this sense in this sense. this is very good, because. uh, now they are also putting pressure on uh, egypt and this is also a delay we have because egypt is , in my opinion, the only way iraq has forbidden us the passage of turkish military aircraft or jordan has forbidden us and only through egypt and therefore the united states will resort now

to diplomacy yet, but they will apparently resort to nowhere and putting pressure on it to close this perimeter and not accidentally put pressure on mexico's iskander complexes. i think what to say straight what those americans try to arrange coup, as the leaders of mexico have a pro-russian opposition. i think it made me so happy doing a lot in this regard, because that's 2 days ago reached. let's put it out of the kander, what's there, right? if asked for it. well, why wait , you can say, but you can’t just who santa claus is, we have a gift for you. it's just that 2 days ago the border control of the united states border control marked a record rd they got to ten thousand illegal border crossings.

by the way, i think that it is high time to raise the issue of this security against north korea iran, too, maximum assistance to the north korean brothers and sisters, this can of course be done, but as far as the administration is concerned, the education of the leaders of mexico, the mexican administration, they are already doing a lot with the migration crisis, which is likely to increase after the abolition of the forty-second section. he stopped another s-350, to break through the border. well, get through it, well, they don't have their own problems. with problems they have their own problem now uh. yes, of course not. why is it one problem to find a way out of the ussr is completely about the national debt the national debt of the united states is not about the economy. this is pure politics. now, if now they are selling their

acceptance of this world of the house, representatives, then the biden administration is a democratic administration. they are now trapped in fact. because that part of the long, which is inside the government is also impossible. that is to say, they must pay there, pension funds, and everything else, the publication has already begun to play out that biden does not want pensioners to be paid e-pension, and single mothers receive appropriate benefits for and not to mention the fact that they owe private corporations and much more. that is, they have a problem, but i 'm talking about something else, the system works. and the fact that the system that they surrounded us with this perimeter and the fact that now they will squeeze when we talk about aircraft, the option was considered that put the swedish fighter watching the swedes. they said correctly, as long as the swedes are not accepted into nato, they can refuse.

now, as soon as they are accepted into nato, i don’t see any european country now, except for greater poland, which the poles can declare something of their own, but everything is sanctioned, so now the poles will be given inside the european inside the european union inside europe cross over such peretubation. when the swiss, who, well , have nothing to do with anything at all. actually broke, right? a hungarians hold on and say, by the way, this european union why is it needed? yes, yes, i just think, somehow i wouldn’t want to, of course, but somehow urban well done, of course, but sleeping in serbia, the policy of the democrats will be more untethered diplomatic will resort to methods that were previously not allowed. and of course, hungary will certainly be broken, they will be broken until it is broken, but it is very possible that in the current situation,

when the administration is backed to the wall. well you're country she's forced to do something on the other the parties need to mobilize the europeans and fight china at the same time. this is where they can resort to tough problems yet. well , we don’t create problems for them yet , we give the americans. we are behaving too, dear , intelligent, it means to count on something. we carry ourselves. unfortunately, for the time being it is so that we really are not at war. i said many times when we talk about war, then wars, so we are not waging. formally, we are running a special military spit on formally it doesn't matter. that's real america when the last time officially declared war on the fourth of june forty-second year correctly after that how many warriors they spent do not declare conflicts. for them, there were wars in the vietnam war. how much they participated correctly in the vietnam war. they

participated second in chinese with e, from the fifty-ninth year of the instructors to the year 75 passed. how many million people they have through this war 4 million, 4 million through this war they didn’t call it, at the same time they fought to the floor while they fought, indeed, and at the same time they went to them. did all the internal structures go but even in this sense they all the same did not pass not casually. they have this idea that the united states can and butter and guns. it is still manifesting itself, you, we can, and there is no oil and no guns. and i'm not talking about us. it’s just that we simply don’t create problems in vietnamese . well done to breed them. another meter that is used in ukraine to fight by proxy. of course there will be a nomination. here, the ukrainization of the war is fought by proxy, and we will supply instructors. we will give you whatever technique you want, but go ahead yourself. here it was experience one of the experiences of the vietnam war. if

they substitute at least something, at least something south korean pops up in ukraine, we should immediately give north korea all that's just everything . south korea should understand this, and japan should at least have a little something. you are stuck in north korea , it turns out we should reconsider relations with north korea. i agree with you, but reconsider at the same time as china. well, again, why wait? chinese comrade, i think they won’t mind, but when we said one would refrain and it’s okay for us interfere with the supply of humanitarian canvases. this is for god's sake what i mean about the un , we can, and the second is the supply of arms to north korea, but if south korea is left at the same time, that is, so that

there are zero illusions at the moment. thanks to the direct relation to what we are discussing, in short, on may 14, 1995 there was a referendum. uh, just a few months, alexander lukashenko was then president and the questions that were raised about the symbolism. and this symbolism is directly rooted in the soviet battle of the ussr uh, this is russian as the second state language, what allowed us to maintain the stability of society, not to follow the path of some post-soviet countries, and this is the union of the russian federation, and we stand steadily on this path and will stand, because the choice of alexander lukashenko and the belarusian people. he is, as they say, an existential life-changing one. this is because some bloggers there are also trying to joke. yes, here belarus is somehow it. maybe we can’t go together with russia completely, and what

henry tigranovich was talking about, we are reloading its political system. we have non-parliamentary bodies of people's representation all belarusian. people's assembly. we are rebooting our political system. e we do it. this is precisely because they are focused on the long term, and not just to win there for a year or two. this is a very important moment. if we talk about the current situation, you know, in my opinion, vasily osipovich klyuchevsky once said about the russian unrest that this was a pie baked in a polish oven, but there was dough. well, the dough was kneaded here in russia, and now, when we look at what is happening around this big conflict not only on the territory of ukraine but also in principle, then , of course, there are many problems and i will speak widely to our society of the union state. and here it says, it would be necessary to adopt a law on a special military operation. why hasn't it been accepted yet? why am i still not in charge of the tornado? i will say more. here

i will tell you. yes? by the way, let's concentrate not so much time, but now many are asking. tired. it's just that stalin is a popular figure, like a red flag. became the order of the day. one is one of the symbols. here russia's struggle is an anti-colonial struggle against germanism. everyone says they stayed, and they constantly somehow reproduce it. in a very interesting way, here we denied the liberal western propaganda that he was the bloody dictator who killed everyone, but when we stood on our backs , i definitely say, he must shoot someone, stalin here. he shot that one, planted that one, but without the thirty-seventh year there would not have been 45, and he appears with us, here in the same image that was imposed on us liberals, and stalin was a smart man. yes, he shot four generals there in the forty-first year of pavlov, and then he takes cadres. and he said, for one not beaten two. uh, for one beaten two unbeaten give vasilevsky recalled his memoirs. the work of a lifetime. when they liberated the right-bank ukraine , i hope that there is yet to come. uh, the russian army,

and he asked voroshilov, he says, the client efremovich, how his properties were ivanovich, before the war somehow. he couldn't do it any other way. he now listens to everything, accepts, says, stalin became another stalin studied. he not only dismissed or shot someone, but he issued a directive. look, the crimean front is defeated by the brilliant manstein the enemy, well, it was a lamp foul, and he is developing the crimean front, dmitry timofeevich kozlov is in command, by the way, he is buried in minsk, what stalin did and he and the mekhlis remove him from office, he transfers to another job with a demotion to command the army, but immediately issue a directive. and bob, these actions in the crimean front were also in kharkov operations in many others. i say i will list the fingers on the hand, there will not be enough generals and even marshals, who, to put it mildly, especially in the first period of the war, did not show themselves very well, but who were given the opportunity to correct, taking into account the experience of mistakes. timoshenko , the same kozlov, i can

list further.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective.

konev, a vivid example of which they should have almost shot at the beginning of the typhoon beetle operation, took him as deputy commander of the western front, then transferred to kalininsky to the kalinin direction sokolovsky was an outstanding soviet military leader after the war. he was removed from his post for unsuccessful operations on the western front. during the liberation of belarus, there was a special trial and the deputy was transferred to another section, that is, the personnel were protected, but conclusions were drawn. the most important thing is to draw conclusions. they materialized right away. that's all. talk about smersh, yes, april 19th.