not oriented formed then not now. and by the way, since 2007 putin has become the destroyer of this precedent. uh, against which exorbitant pressure was exerted on us. now their greed conquers fear. they saw. this is now the opportunity to solve an almost eight-hundred-year-old problem. the russian territory is armless, because europe without russian natural water resources and everything else is doomed to clothe a miserable existence. they know it and this is their last chance. and so they think that this chance is there, it can be realized and we are ready once again for almost everything, because of this we will have to proceed in relation. ah, fellow europeans. here and uh, to understand that uh the way out of

this situation is. uh, in the same place where the entrance to the solution of the confrontation with the united states, america and no other way, this situation will not be resolved no way. how exactly this will happen here will be the question of nuclear weapons about, uh, who is tougher and holds, look into each other's eyes. that's who's hand will not falter, but, frankly, about those, uh, remember about the theses that our supreme commander-in-chief spoke throughout. here are the previous years. i understand that everything that is unfolding now is within the framework of our roughly understood and calculated strategy, which was clear. well, who should be long before today . otherwise, you understand differently to consider

the appearance in the eighteenth year of hypersonic weapons, which came from no where. so his work on it was intense in the early 2000s. that's when they say we don't have strategies, i think let them talk, because i see something completely different. great idea, by the way, i would like to remind the british that for some reason they are created. i want to remind you that we have not yet shown here a promising weapon that we have and has passed the test. and this is not accidental. it is no coincidence that we must understand that we were forced to. to start a special military operation, because they understood the strategy very well, where everything is going, of course, from the fogedid trap. we had to get out the hard way. and what does not understand? the west is so stupid that it is now declaring in relation to us,

which china immediately projects onto itself. so, while china will go through this path of attempts at a peaceful settlement, which we have been working on for 15 years, china will go through in a year and a half. well, he has to pass. yes, throw it, i think i just understood everything, therefore the emerging configurations lead to a big world war, the europeans probably believe that no one understands and is not preparing for this. this means that they did not pay attention to the phrase that the head of the people's republic of china, the head of the russian federation, said goodbye in the kremlin

everything will go further, uh, this pro-western outpost or turkocentric farpost turkey is trying to decide, if you like, this is such a set of very professional people. today , the turks are very professional people who are trying to solve e. in which direction does he move. uh, this is the most fundamental choice that the turkish republic faces today, uh, fillet the west or break out of the anglo-saxon world. eh, how much can you to die for this very thing for the sexy world when it comes time to fight for ourselves, what will come of it from the point of view of russia's interests a more positive question is very serious, to which there is no answer, but this is obviously not a simple confrontation between the so

-called secular and the so-called islamists, this is , which is much more complicated, the united states of america is undoubtedly interested in turkey as the right hand in the region, yes, and set fire to the caucasus and the middle east, and everything is connected like that. e and indeed it is the interest of the united states second option. if here today they are not ready to be loyal and submissive. so you need to undermine it from the inside. and here is a very important point against the backdrop of everything that colleagues talked about. uh, the republic of turkey is fundamentally important for the us today because, uh, everything is clear for europe. she became part of the american system as another state. e united states of america but turkey does not want to become one, it resists. and this is a conditionally neutral state. you can say a non-friendly interval, you can do whatever you like, you can even friendly will fly out try to say,

well, that's what americans don't like they will. uh, it’s shaky from the inside, it was understandable, therefore, the minister of the interior, and turkey, mr. shoylu, repeatedly stated a lot of things he called that the whole world did not persuade america to avito, the second thing he said was that he demanded to remove the dirty american hands here to turkey there was, and therefore , the russian trace must have surfaced there, therefore, the road in opposition to the whip. yes , he immediately said that russia, uh, interferes. although, uh, many may be glad. eh, from the experts of russia , i can not say that i would be glad if this were so, but it is not so, russia does not interfere in matters that have long been said that it is necessary to work with boots. here he named something specific content, and then he said, we are interested in friendship cooperation with russia yes, it’s just going on, unfortunately, we won’t

intervene, it doesn’t work. so that's what this is about. what you really need to work, but salie is ready to work in advance years, there, this is not the moment when it was necessary to drop everything and do it right now , this should be done for a long time. one may wonder. here is the third candidate. we already know the results. uh, erdogan defeated him by 49%, but did not turn it up. or rather, did not screw up. yes, he could have received 51 with his huge administrative resource, but he did not do this. this is a very important fundamental point. he wants to see. uh, second round. uh, so to speak, the second position uh, because his party took. here are many places owner. that is, he is, yes, after all, it ’s better than if parliament lost to you by others precisely the important point that 322 and six hundred e, seats with e in parliament, but belong.

that is, the position is strong, from which erdogan is coming . 5% of the difference between erdogan and kalysh is very important. yes, it’s not 51 and i wouldn’t completely agree, it would be something terrible at night. if he did, yes, he understood it perfectly. why e indulge those who want to return turkey to the abyss of chaos. uh, so, uh, you have to wait, it's okay in 2 weeks. uh, this election will take place like this, there is a third candidate. this is mr. sinanogan, who, like, when he didn’t even kind of defended his dissertation in russia well , let’s mr. shinogan dissertation in russia right after a little recon.

the third candidate who defended our candidacy, yes, defended his dissertation nans. we have this mr. sinanugan. he is known for being a nationalist on one side and on the other . uh, he's now famous for scoring more than the 5.5% predicted. and from the one to whom he is these five and a half percent will be conditionally donated now will depend too much, but he can and will conduct turkish bargaining, which will happen in the near future. uh, and already he got a call between the head of the opposition bloc, quite the ensuing consequences. e. well, here, and so it is philosophically necessary to think about the future, not at the present moment. now everything is clear. but we would have called if she would have supported the russian position or not. the americans, when they graduate their graduates, they

know for sure. why would these graduates support the american position or uh, for example, uh, our turkish colleagues who work, uh, the same thing with the turks in the post-soviet space . they know what their graduates are. this is really their soft power, which brings profit, as far as we are concerned. we graduate a lot of graduates, including sinan na. i. i hope that at least put, but he remembers us. uh, but uh, there are some doubts that we could even if we wanted to intervene in this process, there is, of course, the well-known turkish saying order, what does it mean? this, uh, pays, that one and order a point. yes, sure, could intervene. what are you doing? you can say so, yes, uh, but i'm afraid that it's not a fact , far from a fact, that all of us would listen to us today, and from this we need to draw a lot of important conclusions in terms of the future now.

financial votes will be given to whom it is not yet clear, but there is an intrigue connected with the fact that he comes from the nationalist movement party, which, uh, is part of the alliance of the ruling development justice party. eh, but he has his own accounts related to the head of the party. at one time, he challenged the head of the party. e, davlet melon. uh, he didn't make it. after that, he left , and this party and began his own such a great political career, a large political process along with him also then broke away and mrs. emiral-akshir, who now joined the opposition , is headed. actually a party, but a good party. now the ideal trading position. he has an ideal trading position from the turks like to bargain. well, it didn't work out for 2 weeks. well yes, it's long in 2 weeks. can? why does

it mean a lot to choke? now, once again, i would like to emphasize one very important point: turkey is important for us. a new world is coming. we need to understand who we are growing from the point of view of specialists within the country, yes, who then leave for turkey, the turks, yes, and russian specialists, whom we are growing through turkish partners. it's not just about them, it's about the whole day. west yes we need to work with him very well understand how we work. this is a new world. here is the smell, we are discussing everything, because france germany it absolutely does not matter anymore what is there, the united states and the turks. yes, important turks today, no matter 60 billion trade turnover in russia everything is very simple. of course, we can say that this is such a two-way dependence. we really need to appreciate and understand this too. it's that it's a two way addiction. yes, the turks depend on us. yes we did. so there will be a russian station there, on which the turks will depend, but

we will also depend on our turkish colleagues, therefore their fate. it should be absolutely not e indifferent, but the word at all, but in order to understand everything well, to understand everything. we must develop appropriate scenarios, and develop those specialists who will deal with this within the country and locally so that we know that every graduate who graduates in russia and then goes to turkey can call him. you can call, at least. and it is better to say that i have a question for you. here i said here that i was masturbating to religion. you have started training specialists. you will create a certain condition for me. i mean, i just talked to people. they said they were ready for you there. to create the conditions for reading specials. look, i can't say. of course not, yes. well, that is, no one talked to me, who said that yes, they have already prepared everything.

kazan universities are afraid of me there, because they love me in a whole series, and in this they love me, because they read differently, because, as they say, comrades about the soviet, it means that there is training and so on soviet training. it's like karen said, it's an elephant. and here is the russian one. unfortunately, including turlogy , it's like a pug, so it's a speech. we just say that. e work and much more no, they didn't. understood, i will continue to hammer dmitry. i'm just to bring everything to the end. if anything happens. i start by agreeing with three people. two of them are present here and give me real pleasure. skryom, georgievich. do it, and i agree with the third person, but without any pleasure. from fiona hill it's got to be a bit later. i agree that indeed the situation we have now is very serious to underestimate it. uh, there is no seriousness in any case. here, well, the wrong assessment of what is happening.

in my opinion, it is also not acceptable here in this case, but because we are really dealing with a new type of challenge and but with a new type of war, despite the fact that dima, as it were , says there that this is a long conflict, and he really goes there for a long time, nevertheless, one must understand that, after all, the methods of warfare. that's all, it's time for now. here this one is described. they didn't develop. how qualities developed. yes, and, if we take a historical analogy, then i would compare this war, including a hybrid war, including a war with a united west on the territory of ukraine. i would, of course, not compare it with the great patriotic war, but let's say so in the case its exodus with the northern war in the event of an unsuccessful a c of the previous livonian. well, if we take the northern war, then it’s really very curious, so to speak, such a fact, because the war was a fierce long i had to rebuild everything and the number on the go. uh did you find out what to say? many approaches do not work politically

, the elite had to reshape the entire elite and rebuild it for 20 years. 20 years for some patches of land. and by the way, ukrainian betrayal. there, too, like a chip on the cake. but all that time, this is, in my opinion, a very important thing. and i think that's one of the reasons why the special military operation and what is much broader and more important, huh? a big hybrid world war is coming just the way it goes, you know, which means that st. petersburg was built and became the most modern city, not only in russia but also in the world at the beginning of the eighteenth century. while the northern war was going on, here is the urban environment of that time, the most modern ultra-modern , was built over the years, which means this northern war. and it wasn't just that. i think that this was not just some kind of special one, as if peter’s desire was a civilizational challenge, because russia did not just fight for the earth, she didn’t

just fight there, for example, for just don't lose. she fought to become a superpower, and to be seen , noticed and understood that her interests must be taken into account when making any major world decisions. to win such a status was the main task of that war, and like many others waged by russia. and this cannot be done only by military forces. only so to speak, a convincing military victory had to be demonstrated by some kind of civilization, as more recently they would have said the mouse had to show that civilization, which is present at the very in fact, it is something that can show, that is, show itself as a modern advanced, there and so on. again, in modern terms. in my opinion. this is very important, because after all, all the wars that russia took away well, at least before

the start of a special operation to one degree or another, including the great patriotic war of the north or military wheels. why was it so important, for example, so to speak, to make a film, which means the defeat of the germans in the moscow region to send it to the usc. why was it so important? that work, because it was necessary to show not only a convincing military, success could be done through the transfer of materials corresponding to the military floor. it was necessary to show that this is not just an army that wins, it was necessary to show the civilization of people who know how to speak with the world, convincingly. and it speaks in a very different language. including urban architecture. i argue that at that time st. petersburg had the most modern architecture in the world. and it wasn't just the way it was and that's why when the president said that not only that we have both guns and oil, we have enough for everything. he convinced the people precisely that we were not yet right in the sense that tomorrow it would also be possible to eat in a restaurant. he says that

we will not succumb to civilization. this is very very in my opinion, such an important thing, as it were, but speaking of colativity, a whole number of other questions arise. for example, so to speak, well, or its analogues today, because america was not just not immediately involved, so to speak, in providing assistance soviet union although he understood. which, in general, is necessary for a number of reasons, including those related to the interests of america itself. here we have the same question. a lot of non-american or western countries around the world. the level of their understanding or the degree of awareness that they, too, will indeed, one way or another, face the same threat from the american world, and the threat is twofold. now i will explain what it is, and a lot of them depend on it. in fact, many things were vital in the soviet union, and this is not studekers. this is very important. there were

chemicals in the courses to gunpowder. there were a lot of important things there. uh, we would have won, of course, but it was simply vital. it was then and now that we will also need a lot of things, both in terms of soft power and in terms of a lot of technological things, but for this we need so that the non- american world understands what is happening in the world. and only we can say this, in fact they are looking at us, as sergei alexandrovich is looking at the whole world with hope, but not only in that the sense that we now have to start winning, and they want what is good, they are expected from us, what we will formulate them. first, what kind of world are we going. and secondly, as it were, how will we win. and what a world. you actually, we are with you, we are with you. and one more thing related to what kind of war we are fighting, we think that the west will act. that's it, and not otherwise, all the time, based on the experience

of the past, and the experience of the past is also necessary. if there are already, marxists, and post-marxist, one must understand dialectically there will be no exact repetition of what will happen then and even roughly repeat what she said. fiona you adviser - one of the most powerful political clans in the united states - she said one simple thing, they admitted that american pak no longer exists. this means that all obligations, all financial, er, mechanisms and technologies, on which they are still working, for example, russia and turkey , everything is counted in dollars. yeah, they may be tomorrow from under the whole world, well, there are billions in what they were, but this is how we think in reality, all the same recalculated in this price are considered in the dollar market. this is the problem, we believe, including, uh, with our asian closest neighbors exactly the same. i know that for a very long time belarus

has been shipping in rubles and in lira in national currencies. only no, not only. well, in what well, yes. that's it in the very same here is the same 2/3, which is like a tablecloth, so to speak. understandably withstood. it is now clear from the table of the first seekers and in fact this is the plan of what she said fiona hinksey, and unfortunately, one cannot but agree. this is one of the options that will be cheaper for them. than a nuclear war and much more effective in the fight against us if we do not rebuild than a nuclear war, and it is undoubtedly very necessary to prepare for this. it's all a matter of explaining, and that's all and there can be no more apologies for being fastened to the dollar system once in the final such program i want to say that this is such a solid government visionary, yes , with elements of axiology, but the agenda. well , this is what you were talking about, dmitry just

gave this assessment. actually i envy, but the actual agenda to another forces a lot of attention. belarus these days were. well, karen georgievich went. i am simply impressed by this meeting and sincerely open and warm. i think, by the way, they are waiting for the participants of the program, and our viewers will have to discuss it and also do it with pleasure. yes, i think in soon. tomorrow is already the phone turnover of our viewers. we are ready ah. but yes , we had a lot of conversations here. and what about the president of belarus today? uh, at a combat post, i was at the command post of the air force and air defense, but look how much they said, i don’t want us to this topic, as if we just pushed it aside. how much they spun this, i’m not afraid to say a word in general around this and here, by the way, e is a rather curious style, this year the belarusian information policy took shape. but

some event, for example, there are sabotage attempts to counter-terrorist actions are our actions, and the deployment of nuclear weapons. right now, after the ninth of may, the belarusian authorities pause and then give a clear, clarifying explanation and our opponents. they seem to roll into such an information funnel substituting themselves. that's all they talked about. now it's simple. let the audience read. look how stupid this is, so ah you need to think. uh, i think to our opponents to some of our supporters, before commenting in this vein, but into this trap hit. and who is zelensky, he suddenly became preoccupied with the fate of belarus, i also cannot leave this without comment. he erupted on the eve of his visit to italy , and i don’t know where he got this nonsense at all, because on the one

hand it shows the level of analytics on the banks that exist according to the belarusian rule , you don’t understand at all what is happening in belarus, but on the other hand. if we even look at western publications and publication ran. i will refer to them. although, this is also propaganda certain, these figures that they throw out, uh, noise, but nevertheless , even according to their opponents' estimates. ours, which does not publish more than 70% of belarusians, have a positive attitude towards the russian federation , which is important, 65% have a positive attitude towards ukraine and i also think about russia, because we are absolutely not normal about the ukrainian people. this is our people, which, as president lukashenko said, must be returned to the bosom of the east slavic civilization. is not zelensky this is not his. this is a pack by no means. and it is also very important that even according to the estimates of our opponents, they believe in the victory of russia.

well, at least twice as much, even according to their estimates, than some successful actions of ukraine. i'm not talking about the fact that, again, according to western analytics, the number of those who trust the belarusian authorities is growing. this is the reality, what zelensky says is complete nonsense, but why does she say this, but this is due to what is happening in the west, and in them and in russian society, in part, we we see a similar process. on the other hand , their nervousness grows on the eve of decisive battles and, uh, battles on the battlefield. of course, i mean, and this visit, which he directed to the political community of the west, because there what processes are here again zelensky mentioned sociology. let's work with the numbers a little, and in poland they conducted a survey. uh, so there is such a jenning newspaper is right months. there, you provide humanitarian aid to ukrainians. according to well, approximately 50% of poles

supply heavy weapons, tanks, aircraft ; 16%, tolerate ukrainian refugees ; less than 15%; a few thousand ukrainian companies with joint capital in poland are growing irritation towards ukrainian refugees and attention believes. whether the ukrainian refugees themselves in the success of the zelensky team

what dynamics, if earlier, a few months ago

, 17% of the refugees were not going to return to ukraine, these now 38 and the numbers will grow. they are not going to return to zelensky’s ukraine, much less they are not going to go, as they sent meat for slaughter there in his own hands. here you are exactly the same trend, and in those countries that zelensky visited, germany recently had a question. yes, in general, about 70% will support ukraine more in the conflict, when they begin to detail whether they agree to supply weapons, whether they agree to enter into a confrontation with the russian federation, there the numbers are already 2/3 categorically against this and this is the mood in society. with all tom western politicians cannot completely ignore what the electoral campaigns of last year showed, that they rely on ukraine as an external political lift of the elector's factors. the flax elevator that will pull out does not work at all does not work completely and er.