as in the famous jewish joke? when a crowd of tourists passes, so that people do not offend each other, so that parents and children come feeling that i am talking to

a wall. i, well, yes, okay, and what is inertia is inertia, which was developed in the nineties in 1,000 years. i think now is the time when we need to boldly analyze our mistakes and make some decisions. by the way, i have repeatedly said that many of the things that we are talking about here are being implemented and this year, including at the legislative level, i will not remember it and repeat it. and the more we talk about it. maybe they will hear us there. and the fact that you have to go out to be afraid, we are looking for some kind of approval back. we act like we say no all the time. and here we are doing the right thing. and that's okay. and that's okay. suddenly we felt like these israelis from birth. it's

normal that they all rushed there. and we don’t even have criminal cases on them, we don’t even have any investigation. it's normal that the chubais let him go without letting him sit finally. this is generally all right that the owners of secrets easily leave our country. yes, we pretend that it's all right. it is not normal. and it's normal that we still haven't closed the british embassy. poland is what we constantly talk about, and we always hear from the nits that this cannot be done. so we need to save people there, who of our people remained in london there. yes, it’s normal, a person has long since blown away from there for a long time our normal people have been in russia. you need to look at the spire, they will be without an embassy be given isolation, if we leave all organizations, why do they enter the system from all of them? and we will end. but why are we? and we can, according to our choice, that you go out, that you are not. why should we take the imposed rules,

for example, we need them no less. here are three, ok, we do not recognize a number of international organizations and we feel good about ourselves, and what is the problem. now withdrew from a number of european organizations have done. that's right because implementation isolations really take the place of the chinese. it needs speed, if you want to forward. the chinese, for example, do not listen to the imf at all. they didn't let themselves go. they are participating there for the sixteenth year. we have done how much they influence the minds and approaches. here is the important point. we are behind here. here we show our secondary nature. therefore, just dmitry's proposal should be the impudence of the move, we say no. what, you can't go out? well, you don't have to go out, they

go out. we just constantly reserve money not in our own currency. right quite right, no matter how dependent on us is not yours. uh, when it depends on mvp. and this is another question for our people who will leave. if we don't go out , you forget we are expelled. if we start to say so, we can't marry anyone. you don't understand what's ahead, huh? well, they didn’t get out of osago, they replayed all the protocols and make a decision directed against us, and we sit there and talk badly, as it turns out. but soviet russia came out, from where they went there, their blog did not go there soviet, by the way, if you don’t get out of the league of nations imposed on you, we were expelled. well, what's worse for us became comrades with indian comrades. take off, we

agreed, and here are all these compilation bastards and in the museum. this is good, the last ribaru. by the way, i remembered the turquoise nineties. yes, i always said why they say to privatize some asset, it is necessary to privatize management in this way , sucked out money from his rt and billions of dollars from the aeroflot. he privatized management such that the americans privatized everywhere or they built. uh-huh, in any way to win the americans to show that their world cannot be changed, because otherwise, here it is there is, like, yes, you will be left without a job, how do americans learn chinese and finally find yourself in a new field of advertising.

what are our heated debates? by the way, we have already begun to talk about china , which really surprises me, why do all these strange people consider themselves in the right, speak from the position of some superiority, that americans are europeans, why do they sincerely read, well, europe in general relatively ancient civilization. it is quite heavily corroded, but in relation to the chinese still very young from the bolshoi theater. why do they consider themselves right through the lip so derogatory that's where they get it from here this is the arrogant stupidity of the nation,

who lost their chins in the process of development. where did it come from what is the us doing what exactly is the department of defense doing in the region to stop china or deter china from potentially sending weapons, we spoke with china about the negative consequences of providing lethal aid to russia this would not only prolong the duration of russia’s illegal occupation of ukraine and lead to would be to the thousands of innocent people killed in ukraine, but would also directly supply their moisture to countries that seek to destroy ukraine as a nation. idiot, he's just why lately the american general is something of a stupid idiot, and before that i thought it was only kirby's rear admiral or it just should become, of course, a secretary does not take a person with at least two classes of education. that china usually

objects to this in china says that you supply weapons to taiwan approximately taiwan's defense budget is approximately equal to polish or israeli - it's a giant knife. you understand what i'm talking about, there are serious armies and there really is a serious army, when they are told that you don't supply weapons anywhere, of course, this is perceived very strangely, the people's republic of china. i think that it will act solely on the basis of its own sovereign interests, especially interests. china is a very close long-term stable relationship with the russian federation , and even i would not be afraid of such a bold thesis the victory of the russian federation ukrainian operation, because it is also in the interests of the people's republic of china, this will be a very strong blow to the united states. according to their political positions and so on. yes victory which will be enshrined in the chinese world by the peace plan. maybe it will be some kind of hybrid combinative shank, chinese. there, conditionally french, maybe, but there may be different options, nevertheless. in the interests of the people's

republic of china we are accustomed to perceive china as a really backward country. this it was very long. this is the long hundred years war that was engulfed by the chinese empire as a result of the opium war that instigated the british civil war and the taiping rebellion by the way led this uprising. eh, that means, eh, baptized to protestant priests by the british mors , essenceyuan, that is, it was actually a civil war controlled by great britain that claimed 60 or so million chinese lives then back in the 19th century. that is, then the british empire brought to its knees. china is actually destroyed plunged into a century of civilian troops, of course, when we think about mao zedong's china, these are the jokes. yes, there are thousands of some kind of endless, the last chinese warning. well, of course, china was then weakly destroyed, and in fact it was a country very much left somewhere at the level of african countries. it's true. it knows these years, shames they won't

forget. they know who is to blame for this , specifically the collective west is to blame, but now they perceive china from the point of view that here is mao zedong yes, even deng xiao is there ping uh, the absolutely wrong position has grown 60 times since then, that is, it has actually become one of the largest pillars of the world economy, has about three places of nuclear warheads, three aircraft carriers , and so on a powerful political system, respectively e of the various diasporas that were mentioned from a, the united states, out of habit , continues to look at china as something, which means that its semi-colony, which was not sheltered, was torn off from the soviet union, and so on. it's not so roots at all uh, at odds with reality. and this is a very important point. e was about e that the chinese there, maybe a little bit better than the americans. well, i’m actually not inclined to idealize the chinese, they really are building an alternative global empire. everyone. it’s already clear about this and they spoke openly,

and so on, the chinese themselves will be the last to say this when they build it, of course, this is pragmatics, these are serious questions, and so on, but we have to wonder. what place did we have in the ninetieth year in the global empire of the americans, and what place do we have there will be a global empire of the chinese, firstly, the chinese did not take moscow even once. and if he remembers the western civilization of the attempt to constantly destroy the russians, first the poles there, then the germans, then the french. he is german again. that is, it is in vain. from year to century, from century to century , there is an attempt to destroy the wave. and we will remember asia i'm alexander nevsky i'm not that recently he flashed with e, so so with e, then e, a relative of genghis khan and the mongol empire never set the task of destroying the russians. these are mongolian front especially. i don't have a single convincing argument. well, the source. yes, that is, everything that i saw is already like that, but nevertheless, nevertheless, it was. e,

cultural rostov and kazan astrakhan other khanates. well, not all, but then they became part of the russian empire, what about what? about what? what is the point is just a short thesis, since the chinese are still weaker objectively at the moment for now than the americans are still a little bit smaller there, and so on, until they spread their wings. they pragmatic strategies of building equal relations with all neighbors with the same philippines will objectively follow. yes, they have border disputes over oil fields in the south china sea, but still there is an exchange of contacts, the brand flew, respectively , it is accepted to beijing there and see how the leader of some gabon small states receives it. yes , conditionally. i don’t want to offend shit in any way, there are 3 million people there, all a small state in africa, nevertheless, they talk to them like

on an equal footing with them, as equals, and so on, that there is nothing close to similar in the west, and in russia there will be exactly the same and even much more rights than we have now in the american centric global system that is being built the united states wants us simply to destroy to destroy russia itself is a very concept. china does not have such a task, it is the task of tying russia as an ally. and it is possible that it will, which means some serious influence on us, but i am far from thinking that this is a macron. yes, i tried means to accuse us, because we are becoming china's fat there, he himself had just returned from china, he was promised absolutely right support in the european union in the next elections. perhaps, i am very inclined to believe that, most likely, it was so. who really rebelled , who asked the chinese with an outstretched hand for contracts for bass, so i am nuclear corporations and so on. and we have the opposite coming to us. e. the driver of china in russia and so on, but all zoryana do not behave like this and do not come. they do not agree on equal we

we are building an equal union chinese-centric to the global system in russia, there are much more rights if we competently build much more opportunities and influence to restore our influence globally , let's say so in the context on a global scale than in the american-centric world, therefore, it seems to me, obviously, but at least , china does not climb in the shower. that's for sure. china is not trying to impose some of its values ​​on us. we're kind of like, and we're a lot of polar talking all over the system. it means that by definition it cannot be, but a single-centered hypoxide. i i do not think that it will be very different from the action of the americans. never talks about value. china does not offer you souls to sell. this is as long as he offers what values, china, what he requires from your state, when china has not 300 heads in 35. look for china has been the world's largest economy throughout china has been in the margins. so let's say, for god's sake, but it was

a world of its own, a world that was practically touching. give me at least one example, when china imposes some of its values ​​on other countries, it imposed its values ​​when was right impose what well is that right? what civil liberties does china require to be set aside by any countries? so i, too, i just have never seen a global china, it has never been global. we have no experience with such an object, so i would be careful not to state either. america, before it became global, was our friend, and under the russian empire , comrades stalin's best friend, so to speak, is clear in soviet russia and tsarist russia than america before it became a global

hegemon, after the forty-fifth year was not, but i want to remind you that this best friend landed his expeditionary force and was going to divide russia, steel was not offended. even then he could not be offended, then he did not rule the country. yes, in the sense that if we talk about what kind of friend he was. there what america was for us. let's remember all the stories and something is going on expeditionary corps on the territory of the soviet republic . therefore, here, too, america is not a bad friend was already in the forty-sixth year before the year 45, south america was the first source and technology and strength of everything, and again america was such a great friend that the red steamer was sent to soviet russia and destroyed and searched for the communists. not only after the forty -fifth year. well, in the thirties. this

was it too. no, i'm not talking now. about how good america was. she was a good other woman friend. she was undeniable. yes, she was a pragmatist, of course they were in this germany, and some of me now advertised as an exclusively pragmatic power. the chinese also say they don't offer us any value. we do not know this, because he still knows china. throw everything away the millennium, history, not global. they just were always global. russia suddenly noticed that now it abandoned colonialism when it could conquer, but it turned out, of course, that i didn’t know what it could reach for, but they undertook to continue the great fleet. look exactly the same as i don’t know, there today’s measurements cannot be applied there to the past, so to speak, in exactly the same way, it seems to me that we are today's measurements,

which when they exist, well, you can’t attach them there in the future either. i can once again say that the last years or decades have shown even that any global organization carries a threat. at least. now it may be in there many decades. it will not be so after the next cycle of human development there. yes, technological them. i hope the social is also moral already, in my opinion, everyone relaxed, therefore, on occasion, but some cycle of development will pass and maybe again it will return to globalization on some other principles. but until the last decades of global humanity. it was a story threat for everyone curious that even for the citizens of the united states what is a trump presidency? what is this trump uprising, this is the uprising of americans against the american world, when they do not want to live in the global world that has been built for them, and in this sense , the global world. it will still be the world built on rules. well, there is no need for international law, it will be built, because international law presupposes

the existence of bodies to enforce this law, namely, the international police with international jackdaws. yes, and so on. well, yes, i’m a little americanizing, so to speak, and in this sense it makes sense to look at the collapsing global empire because it poses no less of a threat than the empire that rose even then at the end of the forties of the second half. by the way, give me a slightly different opinion about the end of the investigation of the prosecutor dope. i still think i will call him, because that's how he is called from where a freak. he's still german. in fact, this is, of course, zilch. well, look, well, they broke the law, they ran a bunch of investigations, they ruined the careers of people in the ranks, the fbi faked evidence to get warrants. this is the deadline. he did not put anyone in jail while the democrats, when they attacked on false grounds, so to speak. they broke a lot of their lives and even put some people in jail for a few days, even with trump's employee carterbadged him, and then

they released him, so to speak, well, he sat for 60 days or 360 something like that. that's why, of course, the conservatives are unhappy with what happened for them is a complete zilch, because the fool did not cope. well, this means one more thing, that, of course, the issue of internal power has not been resolved and the issue of the law enforcement system in the united states has not been resolved . and i should have been a fool solve the same problem, if he fired a dozen, 2 fbrows, there are the most retired koza drummers. if he had planted at least a couple of c grades, perhaps this would have begun to be tried on by american society. and here, when he was defiantly not allowed to do anything, everyone was like that. well, everything means you can’t rely on the law. and this means that in this sense, all the internal conventions of american society are broken. well, yes, it’s clear that they

began to break them intensively. when trump went for the presidency, all this was against him case. applied. it was a terrible word of convention, because they believed that conventions were broken, just trump, i will explain what it is, because look, american society, well, it’s clear that this is not even suckers. this is for liberals. this is calculated. that's what they have there democracy, maybe the president. yes, there is a difference, i'm even worse between suckers and liberals, of course, liberals. in that, as it were, suckers are deceiving, and the liberals themselves, right? that is, somehow such a thing is, as it were, for liberals. it is calculated that there really is democracy, and so on and so forth. similar in the sense that in america in the same america i can answer, there has always, of course, been an exclusively planned structure, surprisingly the most advanced country of modern times. she, of course, never released it from the new time, that is , the clan structure existed from the first president of the united states. as

you know, the second president was. dad is there on the eighth, in my opinion, the president of the united states well, and so on, but another thing is that they had agreements among themselves that yes, of course, we are much more even than everyone else. but first, we provide adequate living conditions for them and these people whom we have outlined as our citizens. they seem to be more important to us than everyone else. this is the first moment, the second. we do not turn weapons against each other. well, it’s clear the right to walk and the system is really a weapon. well, because it is a coercive force. so this thing broke first global corporations, which actually led washington during the presidency of barack obama, which preceded trump. they said no guys. no, what does american citizens mean and is more important than that one racism for us all consumers are important our citizens are consumers in this sense, you are american citizens. sit in response to 100 trump appears who breaks the convention in the sense that such guys are not taken

to the presidency at all. they can give money to the president, they will correct the officials, please, we will even give you one of the probation if you catch, well, the presidents, yes, and also on behalf of the farmers. yes, you are crazy. we will put you in jail now, and this was the third convention , you can’t turn weapons against your own. as a matter of fact, this is how it will happen and there is their world built on the rules. only inside, of course, he is now so to speak , the transformation is taking place and the outside world is built on the rules. after all, he proceeded from the fact that the cold war was over and there was no one else who could really, well, build their own rules and have their own values. and let's just say this. here we are the elite which is here. we have organized this fact with the american. we have organized the global western world. after no one else can claim to rule the world during the cold war, and in this sense, when china develops. when russia says no, well, no, you should no, they begin

to treat it exactly the same way as the liberal americans treated trump. yes, you have the right to go. so to speak, world leaders. yes, even just there you cannot be equal among us, but he says why and then this completely complete already begins. they refuse. even from some i don’t know the political team in the same way, like they are, in my opinion. that is, it is the policeman 's domestic policy in outwardly refusing polites in relation to russia, at first, but it's a little easier, well, inevitably it comes from china what are the chinese from? as a matter of fact, he got a little crazy when they began to be rude against him, when they began to introduce measures against him that seemed completely possible, by the way, despite the fact that china was corrupt. that's what i called corrupting everything, that's the one from top to bottom, they ordered to do nothing of the kind. here then, there is still china, of course, i also understood. well, a simple thing, and in this sense, what the chinese comrades are saying is that we are now trying to build relations of a new

type, you are actually present at a historical moment when we are trying to build a world that will be really based on what -something all-??? mutual understanding mutual respect. it is fundamentally different from what it was before. but, if we are inside and even more so pour into ours someone thinks what we mean, this global dimon is bad. let's go chinese let's take. they seem to be good. why wrong? i don't understand another. why do we need a hegemot at all? i do not know why we need a hegemon, the real result, for some reason decided to lead in yuan. now , it's still all over the place. it's all the way to the side there is activation, which is bad. that's why it needs to be pulled, that is , we need people who dare to say that we are building the economy in a different way in a sovereign way , this is still not the case, than the truble education causes this in everyone. for one simple reason, you have to take on gigantic responsibility. it is a gigantic responsibility to claim one thing from

the podium. i remember in some year. i don’t remember now, in the thirteenth fourteenth, or something, well, for sure, before the return of crimea to its native range, there was a lot of conference on import substitution next to something such a fiery suffocation on the young. well, that's all like yes, yes, yes, well, we're moving on. champagne and i continue to carry dean too. well, from the podium , i see. how is it all to be understood? and now, of course, now i have it yes, now already with champagne and even with vodka all projects are hosted, they say, here we need champagne. the mfc needs to cross this barrier. needless to say, not just sober. and i must say so, it is clear to sleep and see some kind of happening and doing it every day really helps you dare. to tickle the nerves of vices, they do not crawl out of the cunning slums of the russians. and now

keep your pockets cleaned out in an instant, and you could even slash with a knife. so four without water is ready to order. at the end of may we fasten it out with legs game and a bottle of lafite and a bottle of rain and i, perhaps, sour cabbage soup.

i think what for is also a head-butting

question here. that's what's really the question. that's how to say that we civilization is a civilization to afford foreign exchange reserves. no matter how friendly another country can be, but civilization. this is what a civilization is, which grows self-sufficiently from itself, which from itself produces rules, ethical standards, security measures, including our economy.