already implemented and this work is ongoing. the main thing is to be safe. our connections in key areas on which the development of our countries depends on the independent progressive development of our countries in such areas as high technology financial mechanisms logistics chains. in general, everything depends on the security of our countries and the allied state in the broadest sense , military-political, economic, technological, cultural, civilizational. if you like and as far as you said, uh. recently announced for next year creating an economic space from minsk to vladivostok but this is probably a little, but such an artificial artificial mention, because well, if we talk about

geography, then, probably, it should be from brest and, say, to south sakhalin or to south kuril terms. for many years now, since the signing of the treaty on the creation of a union state, we have been forming a single economic space . 28 union programs have become a milestone qualitative stage that advances this task. i mentioned, and uh, the benefit for the citizens of our countries from the fact that we will act, in fact, on the basis of common economic principles. we will promote a single norm in the field of social policy and in general. equalizing the rights of our citizens in all areas is work, but we have made significant progress. the benefit for our citizens, in my opinion, is obvious. good afternoon.

i have a question for sergey fedorovich, and sergey fedorovich, you, like sergey viktorovich, have already mentioned the current crisis in the european security system, and as a result of it the situation in ukraine, however. all wars inevitably end in peace, and our country has made and is making every effort to this end. and if belarus has its own vision, the future of the crisis security system in the regions, have we already discussed these issues with our russian colleagues? will the voice of minsk be heard, so to speak, in the new yalta or the new one under the buildings? thank you why not in the new minsk for sure? thanks for your question. it is really very relevant and you know that belarus since its independence and adhered and adheres to a peaceful foreign policy. we have always advocated and

advocate for a safer world for everyone, and not for a select few countries, and that is why throughout. well, enough, well, for many years we have consistently promoted the initiative of the head of our state, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko , on organizing and broad dialogue on security issues on preventing interstate conflicts on reducing tension in the military-political sphere in restoring confidence, the so-called initiatives of helsinki, 2, which the president announced during a meeting of the parliamentary, and the ballalia of the osce in minsk, uh, of course, for us, there were already obvious prerequisites for the emergence of a possible conflict, uh, in europe, which was formed from a rather selfish and one-sided policy

individual western countries that tried to build their security at the expense of the security of others. we are on different platforms in different formats. eh, tried. promote these theses promote these theses peace initiatives. uh, and we are very sorry that they did not listen to us then. today , perhaps, the situation is developing in such a way that the heltic two are no longer enough in need of a truly broader, comprehensive dialogue covering all conversations and all the key players in the world on global security issues. well, i would say in the spirit of san francisco they mentioned yalta in the ass. yes, that is. well, this is probably the best example. because today we have to talk about

security for all we have to talk about security, which would take into account the interests, uh, and would give guarantees. to all, without exception , a country of the world, including russia and belarus these are the initiatives we, for our part, are ready to promote and adhere to them. and, of course, security issues in general. the issues of the need to form a qualitatively new architecture of european global security are the subject of our discussion, sergei viktorovich, and we , of course, will continue this dialogue . moreover, you see that recently in many regions of the world there are peace initiatives. we heard about china's peace initiative we heard about latin america's peace initiative just the other day, the president of south africa announced the african country's peace initiative and plans to send african leaders to discuss the peace agenda.

so i think that this is demonstrating that today the vast majority of the international community, the vast majority of the countries of the world are aimed at really forming. e. a new security system that would take into account the interests i will add a few words to all countries without exception and which would guarantee this security for all, and sergey mentioned how we , together with many other countries of the euro-atlantic region, sought to consolidate the principle equal to indivisible security within the osce. in parentheses, i note that this j-prince was enshrined and in the documents on the creation of the russian council of nato equal indivisible security was proclaimed in the osce, it was directly written that not a single country, not a single organization in the euro-atlantic space

has the right to enhance its own security at the expense of the security of others and to claim dominance in that geographical area. all this was trampled underfoot by our western colleagues when the course was set for the reckless expansion of nato and our attempts to translate these solemn incantations, under which the leaders of the western world signed into practice. and let me remind you that back in the late 1990s, we proposed to our nato colleagues to codify these principles and take over the legal ones. obligations not be strengthened by infringing on others, and these attempts were rejected, it was said that security guarantees of a legal nature are possible only in nato and we will not allow anyone to prohibit any country

from joining the north atlantic alliance, well, to the argument that this directly contradicts, and hmm the text, under which there are signatures of their presidents and examples , there was no clear answer. well , for the last time, our attempt to achieve implementation, and in practice, these high-flown pathos promises, but in the sphere of indivisibility security was undertaken at the end of 2021, when, on behalf of president putin, we handed over to the americans and nato draft treaties aimed at ensuring the security of all in europe. treatment of states, including, of course , ukraine, but including russia and belarus, and , unfortunately, ah. you know the result of the arrogance of the nato members, who said that no one can dictate to us. and what should we

do, well, it was the cause, in general. that is the crisis, the deepest in the field of european security, which we are now we observe, but uh, here sergei fedorovich mentioned. e, helsinki 2a and mentioned san francisco, if we talk about helsinki two, this is always associated with the organization for security cooperation in europe, the role of its finland in promoting these positive constructive processes, at least in the context of political agreements, if we do not we can them. translate into legal unfortunately, but even political agreements created, but still more, uh, a positive atmosphere, but uh, reckless uh, nato expansion not only by

east, but also to the north and in other geographic directions undermines the very prospect of further normal conversation about european security, because with the entry of finland, sweden about sweden, apparently, will also soon gain its membership in nato a and c, switzerland will practically abandon its neutral status in practice . the part of europe that professed military-political neutrality is shrinking. this was enshrined in the constitution in the respective states. and they created, if you want space to find a balance of interests compromises between the nato part of europe and , say, an allied state and the organization of the collective security treaty this

process. unfortunately, we are seeing an opportunity for such a constructive one. politics on the continent with the role of neutrals as an initiative is an opportunity, in fact it disappears sadly, so i agree that when and if the west will come to its senses and when, if the west realizes that it will not be able to stop the historically objective process of the formation of a multipolar world, it will require, of course, a conversation. eh, not at all. limited only to europe ahh, the san francisco conference was all about global security, and we can't get away from talking about global security being fair and equitable.

hello kirill orlov sputnik agency sergey fedorovich please tell me what is the reason for the introduction of temporary border control on the land border with russia last week and can you at least give an approximate date for the lifting of these restrictions? thanks. well i'd say it's not exactly control. it's more of a monitoring the situation on the border , which is primarily related to the forthcoming entry into force of our intergovernmental agreement with the russian federation on a common visa policy and mutual recognition of nevis, so i would not use the term control, but rather use the term monitoring. it is carried out in close cooperation between our border service and the russian border

service, which is also present there, which also monitors this situation , there is familiarity with the situation and how informed, in principle, the situation on the belarusian russian border it is quite calm, and i am sure that it will always remain so. thank you very much, the final question of the general national television, belarus good afternoon. i have a question for the two ministers, the former chinese envoy to russia, now the prc special representative for eurasian affairs a likhoe, and the european tour began among the planned points of visit, ukraine poland-france russia including, well, on the eve of a and the stated purpose of his visit is to seek permission ukrainian crisis on the eve of the french president said that e seriously it’s impossible to consider this, because russia has relations with china. vassal in the same way about relationships. e belarus and china are often said, uh, our, uh, european

partners. here. how do you assess the prospects for the european tour, the prospect of china's peace initiatives, how will they be perceived by europe and the united states if, for example, they make such statements about russia, belarus thank you what concerns? uh, mr macron's statements about, uh, the master's vassal. you know, this is according to freud he says that, and mr. macron is known for the fact that for more than a year, he has proclaimed a course towards ensuring the strategic autonomy of the european union . this is an eye that cries out in the desert . let’s say the minister won’t allow it, but

the economy of the same mr. macron, back in august last year, shook the air, and complained that because of the actions of the united states in the context of anti-russian sanctions. and in the context of the fact that the european union i was forced to obediently follow this and the american illegitimate policy. the cost of, er, energy carriers for european business was four times more expensive than for business in the united states, which led, where the industrialization of europe, the transition to the transfer of business, and from the old continent across the ocean. just like long before the special military operation and completely regardless of what happened there, the united states took a strategic course to reorient the entire european union from cheap energy sources from russia to expensive ones.

energy carriers from the united states, they achieved this. here is an article in the gardin newspaper, in which sergei fedorovich referred to another of the numerous confirmations that objective analysts are in the west. this has been recognized for a long time, therefore. if mr. pasta is offended that all his calls for strategic autonomy actually turn into complete subjugation of the european union as a vassal of the united states. well , he probably has such a psychology and, according to freud, he tries to transfer his sores to relations between those countries that they preserve. self-respect, which retains its independence and which proceeds from the need to promote

exclusively equal cooperation, which is the cooperation between russia and the people's republic of china between the russian federation and the republic of belarus, by the way, the eurasian economic union has an intergovernmental agreement with the people's republic of china, in which everything is very clear spelled out and which, unlike relations between the united states and the same european union, is a document fixing fair principles, mutually beneficial principles, development of relations between countries and between relevant organizations. as for the plan of the people's republic of china, as it is commonly called, or the position of the people's republic of china on the settlement of the ukrainian crisis, here in the development of the answers that we gave to the previous question on how to build a security architecture, if you

carefully read this chinese position with twelve points, then the main provisions of this position are those that are systemic in nature. it is the need to respect the principles of the un charter in their entirety in their inseparable interconnection without any double standards. this is a need for global approval. in practice, the very principle of the indivisibility of security for all states, which we have just spoken about. this also applies to the inadmissibility of unilateral sanctions that are not provided for by the charter of the united nations and a number of other systemic things that clearly show the position of the chinese people's republic a.

it consists, as far as i can judge, in the understanding that what is happening in ukraine is only a reflection of the crisis phenomena that have been accumulating in world politics and the world economy as a result of the actions of the west to prevent objective processes of the formation of a multipolar world, when the north atlantic alliance, which until recently modestly declared that this is just a defensive organization exclusively engaged in ensuring the security of the territory of its member countries, and for almost a year now. uh, nato declares its global responsibility that it should solve the issues of preventing crises in india, the pacific region, as they call the asia-pacific region, and the goal of containing

the people's republic of china is openly declared, so the aggressiveness of this bloc is manifested on a daily basis and here is what president putin said at the china initiative during the visit of zenpin chairman to moscow that there are many provisions that we are ready to take this as a basis in general and reflects, uh, the objective reality, which is to end such crises. but like the one that the west created in ukraine, it is necessary to agree on fundamental systemic things. first of all , it is a charter he sovereign equality of states, when no one will. to be guided by colonial instincts and try, as

before, to exploit everyone else in every sense and live at the expense of others, but let's see what they say, uh, mr. capitals where he went before he comes to moscow, uh, here. i just mentioned that there are other initiatives, as they are called the brazilian initiative, the initiative of the president of south africa and that, in another case, we responded to an appeal to us from latin american friends that we are ready to consider any of their proposals, which are dictated a sincere desire to contribute to the stabilization of the world order, but so far, unlike our chinese neighbors, not from the brazilians or the africans. we haven't seen anything on paper. well, well, we confirmed that we are ready for contacts when they are

interested in this, but because, uh, in our interests. here is the logic that is becoming more and more clear today and to be conveyed by an independent observer to the largest possible number of our partners on all continents. that's probably what i can say. but following the visit of the chinese representative, of course, we will inform the world community. thank you well, there is not much to add sergey viktorovich answered this question in such detail question. in general, i agree with the assessments that sergei viktorovich made regarding the statements of french president macron. uh. i think that france should really take a closer look at

the positively constructive and creative experience of china and chinese diplomacy, because the experience of chinese diplomacy. today, it has already allowed, e , to resolve a number of state contradictions, and chinese diplomacy continues to work in the same direction, putting forward its peace plan for ukraine, so today, of course, it would be worthwhile to concentrate effort is really on everything. possible solutions and outcomes, because sooner or later, as mentioned in the previous question. yes, the wars are over. and we all need to think about peace, and chinese diplomacy today is aimed precisely at this, so we are on our side. naturally, we will also closely follow this process for the progress

of this initiative during the talks and the chinese special representative. uh, in russia in ukraine, well , by the way, he is going to france, germany and poland. eh, hopefully at some stage, he will also visit belarus . yes, because belarus has always been a platform for peace negotiations on the territory of belarus and many rounds have passed, starting with the minsk agreements and ending with, uh, those negotiations that were organized. last year. i mean three rounds. belarusian, that is , russian ukrainian negotiations, which is why we, for our part, will follow this process very carefully and naturally, we will expect that our interests in this negotiation process, as neighboring parties, as countries that at all stages participated e in peace negotiations, e, related to the regulation

of the conflict in ukraine will also be taken into account. i forgot to answer that part of your question which concerned europe's attitude towards the chinese plan. well, europe - this attitude does not hide the relationship is the same e as uh from washington uh, everything is coordinated there, and the relationship lies in the fact that if russia said that this can be discussed, then it is not good it is declared directly that russia does not want to negotiate on zelensky’s terms and there can’t be another basis for negotiations that hmm the plan that the west will promote is zelensky’s plan of there, in my opinion, ten points, which by and large requires the surrender of the russian federation the trial of the russian federation the payment of reparations in ukraine and to someone else and only after that, and the leadership of the kiev

regime is favorable to agree to sign some kind of peace treaty. well, the west says that this is the only plan that is now on the table that the west judge for yourself, so when zelensky himself declares who i should talk to in moscow, i'm not going to. it was under literally the other day that she once again confirmed that they did not say that last year they adopted a decree prohibiting negotiations with the russian federation, and when we hear moaning from the highest tone of brussels, london that russia is completely not interested in any - some peaceful initiatives there. but i'm just tired of commenting. this is when it was said premium just what will be acceptable for zelensky well, everything, please, then. come on, let the tail twirl the dog, as it has happened before in the same american story. thank you very much completed. thank you, this was a broadcast

of a press conference following the results of the negotiations between the ministers of foreign affairs of russia and belarus , now a short advertisement, we will continue further. and whatever the experts take to solve any issue, quarantine all quality verified video huawei smartphone for 20.000 999 m. video you choose four nuggets or 2 strips for only 39 rubles.

meet a new participant in the marathon of discounts on sber megamarket seasoning, kotani, for only 139 rubles. sber megamarket nazarova i will take a pensioner at sberbank on may 18 a free deposit rate of up to nine and a half percent cashback 3% bonuses in pharmacies.

go to megafon go to the supermarket and buy on a scooter. we will give you a 35 percent discount and free delivery in 15 minutes. book profitably.

install the sportmaster mobile application, launch an activity tracker on a hike and get bonuses for sportmaster steps the most sporty app. pyaterochka rescues meet