i am very grateful to them in the same way as israel, which is still quite good. i know i should be sincerely grateful. for its existence and to all those terrorist groups that are shelling it and to all

those neighboring regimes that we have been saying for a long time , we will destroy you, because they don’t give it. we see it for the israelis, but for us we remember how it all sounds within the framework of the democracy of the struggle for the right parties that will come right now and fix everything, that is, privatization will continue, but uh, others people will also be the beneficiaries. i don’t remember these people, that i don’t remember how khodorkovsky financed the communist party and yablokov at the same time with terrible force. i have no reason at all to assume that mikhail borisvich is unselfish. here's what i can guess. whatever sins she wants, but

whatever the scenario, he is a group of yukos yes, and in general, all of our mortgage auctioneers. well, these are also better than switzerland now and those. who and in london and those who went to israel, they pulled the country, they sawed it up, and i heard from the same deputies of chubais more than once that, well, she shouldn't be like that, she's a big stupid one. well, why the regions in which there is oil regions in which there is oil? no, he 's some kind of there, the ryazan region, why do they have to be in the same country? today, well, the map has already been drawn, well, there will be 34 regions or , if necessary, 134 regions will be

. oh , what kind of shi-sunites and kurds are there among themselves in kurdistan, figure out who turned on the main ones or which suleiman i'll watch with interest. this standard scheme should not be a single china why should it be a healthy one . and in general, partition maps of everything in the world and turkey iran well, this is old entertainment. why should russia be different? thanks guys. we must speak for the fact that they swim us. they are sincerely honest after i heard it all. i don't have any instincts other than a fanning strip from my thigh. no matter what, people hold a position or are called experts.

well, on instinct, it’s just that there’s a lubricant for the bayonet and says something, and what she says or is it imperfect all the same and it’s very good that they say it, what i would like, in addition to the endless drawing of red lines. i finally, as i wrote, father dumas will see what color their giblets of life are. i always tell you, as a true liberal , an absolutely liberal person, a kind fluffy one. here is soviet true, this is a very good word, just like a rainbow, this is from the books of the essence, here it is for children, and not at all homosexuality, this and a lot of that, if anything, steal all the good words and take to put on a watch. why should it be? democracy, you

guys, it's great you don't have to give rainbow as a sodomite, of course, it was strategic, so honest guys, thank god, now i absolutely agree. with dmitry gennadievich very much. we have officials , politicians, diplomats inside the country. i know people who, strictly speaking, should not be officials, not politicians, not diplomats. well, there just shouldn't be some. well, for generations of soviet times, clans have been accustomed to doing nuclear disarmament and agreeing on how we will reduce something. i know these guys they are sincere. they are still doing it.

the corresponding classes of weapons and their readiness to use real readiness, and not half-hints, because, well, i understand that it's good when the president said. why do we need a world without russia but i would have liked it even more hmm no, the signal is such a neutral big bang. neutral waters. stop messing up their own polygons. and why poison deer on novaya zemlya, and then some completely uninhabited island off the coast of canada or the united states anecdote one two three, yes, which the newlywed was carrying and stumbling one two three, and he shot her. i told

the brides. it's extremely useful for cultivating fear, god and the understanding that, uh , let's live together, but it's still easier they are in the style of kata leopold when it's just hmm verbal swaying of the air. i'm sorry, i. i say, as a liberal person, i try warm up. yes, what kindness, you can directly feel each such correctional list, it's time to write, because

after all, all these aunts, uncles , it would be time to put them on the list on the topic of what will happen after something real starts, because that under the future nuremberg or non-nuer, and maybe lugansk or donetsk process. i would remember everyone, as for the schultz in the end, whose dad is not a fascist, do you understand hitler's dad, goebbels , heydrich? they were nazis. well, are you parents? parents? of course not. and what?

i'll start then with blinkin's statement that russia can be recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism. this will indeed be a big step. this is not the same as latvia, estonia and other giants of world politics. i will explain why, but first i will say what the americans understand by a strange sponsor of terrorism. i will quote these provisions that regulate such a status, let's say for such a state of cuba what was charged? well, cuba the first thing is that cuba supports the revolution as a way to seize power. this is what the americans say organize a revolution starting from the ukraine to all the middle eastern states around the world. this is the first reason the second reason cuba

helps. means training by councils by deliveries of the weapon to groups. ask you how he is doing with his e, the so-called rebels, who without the americans, of course, would not have been there on such a scale and with such a level of training, the third cuba harbors members of the basque terrorist organization there - this is half those terrorists who are from here fled now live in european countries. and in general, everyone should be recognized as sponsors of terrorism, iran is blamed. iran is also recognized and has such a status, and blame is early placed on the fact that it supplied weapons to the syrian regime in the context of an armed conflict. and what are they doing to ukraine, which are actually in the conditions of an armed conflict, that is, we see that according to each of these criteria the united states if this is taken as a state sponsor of terrorism, then the united states is a world hegemon, a terrorist

which by all criteria should simply destroy itself. but what is he doing? what is the risk if this is done? i won’t say there that additional sanctions, anything else they want to introduce, they can now introduce, but there is a very important thinning that if this step is taken, then those actions that are carried out as part of a special military operation . they can recognize them as allegedly terrorist acts, and then ukraine as a state, citizens of ukraine, organizations registered in ukraine will be able to apply to american courts with claims for material compensation for these actions. how will they compensate for this? i think for us for all perfectly clear. these are the funds that we have frozen there at the moment. and that is why we have repeatedly discussed in this studio that we should not take lightly the resolutions of the un general assembly on this topic and played many others. well, there is necessarily no legal force, what difference does it make. it's all just going to daddy

in order to refer to speak. there, no one will understand at this moment generalsambre. it was social security. there was a decision made somewhere else there is no other possibility. it is necessary to transfer funds from russia to ukraine under this pretext. uh now as for hmm means those, uh fantasies, i guess i don't know what to call about the fact that russia will fall apart that russia will lose in this confrontation. they will share. uh, our territory, of course they fantasize about it. uh, powerfully collectively and spare no effort about it comes out on an ongoing basis of the article. they hold events, well dedicated i would like to concentrate on one phrase that was published in the gard it said that if , as a result of the end of this conflict, russia does not slide into totalitarianism, then the remnants of the democratic opposition that exists in

the country will finally recognize the transformative and progressive role of the authorities of the european union that is, in -first it's uh, completely in england that left the european union yes, by the way, a good clarification even at the bottom paid attention. uh, so, first of all, the expression itself is absolutely crazy. this is understandable. it shows enough. uh, obsessed fascist perception of power. yes , which seems to be characteristic of the authors of this material, one of whom, by the way, was a professor at a large western university, on what i want. here , focus on two things first. now it's clear. why do they need? this is the so -called democratic position. i want to agree with you and agree with yevgeny yavich that they understand not only refugees by the democratic opposition. this means that they are now sitting in their studios and are broadcasting various kinds of broadcasts. these

people among us are here and they are not picketing in the street exclusively and not telegram channels. social networks are led by a lot of people, in offices where very important decisions are made. and the way a whole range of decisions are being sabotaged today. hmm distracts to the idea that these people are hoping for the same outcome as, uh, the authors. uh, so the second edition of the guardian that i would like to draw attention to is this. this is a crazy idea about the progressive, the role of progression, and so on . evgeny ivanovich said that you are good things. there the rainbow was taken attributed to the gardens. there 's something like that with the word progress the same thing and with the word development the same thing. hmm, if i'm not mistaken, uh, representatives of the frankish school. odorno said that the freedom of a person is not an opportunity to choose between white and black, but to refuse altogether the prescribed such choice and make one's own choice. we have been for a very long time in time

through textbooks. below, by the way, movies , clips, discussions, discussions, they say, that's what there is exactly progress you. do you mind progress and every time you say we don't like it. everyone tells you, well, you're not a progressive person. you are some kind of retrograde. that is why i would like to stop this question. your citizens are ours all the time brainwashed by itself this theory of progress. she is extremely controversial debatable. and in general, i don’t think that it has the right to, uh, such a serious dominance in our public consciousness, public discourse. why is this what progression is, how does he understand what it means, a certain worldwide, it cannot necessarily be within the framework of one society a worldwide process that marks the transition of human society from a state of savagery to a state of the highest civilizational level, and not only technological policy , legal, economic, moral and ethical, and so on. first

question. is the whole society moving together as equals in the same direction. they speak at the same pace. no, it doesn't move, it's together. always moving in different directions to help us, anyone some societies reached the peak , collapsed, others began to grow. only at this moment. well, there is no such universal movement, so the second question that can be asked here, but is there any criterion , is there any way to define at all, and what is human well-being, to understand that here it is at a small level, and here on high. here can someone explain what a developed moral ethical system is. what is never? this, i think , cannot, and in general there are categories for which development is not typical. why do we think that everything must develop. i was born with ten fingers on my hands, does this mean that this is bad, if it were 15 it would be much better to have two eyes, if i had a third on my forehead, this is definitely a good indicator there are many late modernists, they say, one human mind and uh, that means, uh, one intellect in

a person is bad. now, if he was a schizophrenic, that's good, because schizophrenia is something a lot of personalities. it also means wealth. inside one person three four five six conflicting personalities. that's democracy. that's what lsd leads to from here. yes, this is what this obsession with the fact that everything must necessarily develop leads to. as a result, i don’t really say here that we can determine epistemologically in general, how it is possible to measure all this, how what kind of theory of knowledge exists in order to determine this progress and does not exist at all. and that they ultimately offer us what they consider their progress, what they consider their development, what housing told us about. he says there's nothing rethinking. he says, you know, the last man, when he destroyed everything that is not himself, put himself in the place of god, he stepped into this period, which is called uh, nothing of the will, and

he will move in the direction of the will to nothing, that is, such a passive not gism. to active nihilism, that is, in general , to the active destruction of everything that is around. they offer it to us. we, when we see how they act in their own society, how they act in their own their own families, and even okay, god bless him with such categories that at the everyday level they destroy their own political institutions and destroy the legal institution and destroy us in a year and a half of special military operations. just one in the mouth. this is how we look, which means that the jaw has already fallen off from the fact that everything that determined their politics was the legal system. they strangled , destroyed and ruined with their own hands. here is the right to private property of the separation of powers. there, then, by parliamentarism and everything, everything, they showed that in fact these states are controlled behind the scenes by elites who, through the executive branch, can issue directives to various organizations and so on, which will not even be challenged, not by the legislature

, not by the judiciary, that the private property of a person is not a sacred right. and this is just an illusion. and what? property can be taken away from you any second yes, various procedural tricks will be applied in order to prove why it was taken from you, but to those from whom it was taken to us in particular now, when they start take away under this pretext that we are allegedly state sponsors of terrorism, when these hundreds of billions of dollars are taken away , we are unlikely to say, well, okay, but at least they complied with the legal norm , it will be clear to you that there is more mistake than giving this money to these people and support them. yes, it would be impossible for them to commit there simply . but i, as a person, have a terrible liberal look. that's the right age. when i hear progress, i immediately remember the great october and progress by mankind. put statistic we all studied uh soviet era fix switch try to reproduce. what was already there will be almost impossible.

well, it's very precisely surprising. that's just the development of thought. they are sincerely convinced and sinless. they really believe that there is only one way. they know him, they don't even see him. how much they have betrayed all these principles that they have had for the past five years. they don’t even understand this, in principle, that’s a more unsteady civilization than western ones with absolutely blurry postulates now it is impossible to imagine her daughter vladimir for several thousand years, because these people who know how to do it these people are the heirs of the roman empire, who it was believed that there was only one civilization, they are around them barbarians, this is their head of the church. says i am without a sinner fluid look. well, now they destroyed culture, of course, yes, and you did it, that is , it suddenly became clear that if the roman civilization was standing on the hills, and on

some pillars, then the current ones are absolutely shifting sands. nevertheless, i am compelled to clarify the whole concept that i have touched upon, and progress in the usual sense is understood as the gradual liberation of a person from external restrictions. indeed, if the release occurs too quickly, a person dies from this. as it is sleeping sickness, and with the level of well-being it is usually a little more difficult to consider money, but practice shows that when a person is good, he stops multiplying. sometimes it resists wild growth. uh, farther now now tsarist russia was badly bred so that in the guinness book of records included usually breed when there is no light to improve living conditions. with all my negative attitude towards the last period, michael i'm not talking about this, but people from the village move to the cities , they stop being born the first generation, it

just gives a sharp increase, and then they stop. well, and so on. no, just here i am with all the deepest imposition, but just the reverse statistics are being recorded with the growth of well-being, women are freed , they refuse a number of functions , the birth rate is falling there, and not just the moment is growing, then it increases to work where religious factors are there, that is, simply consumption and what is good. that's when we think that consumption growth is so good in itself. we prove that with the growth of consumption , to link the birth rate, life became better, but longer as it sounded. this saying is completely in that year. here, the second, with the turn of the sixty-seventh seventy-fifth years of mankind, we are in a state of generally

long-term degradation, with which we actually have to jump out, therefore those uh, the conclusions that we make on the example of our lives need to be understood that this is an experience of defeat not only in our country. it is an experience, as it were, of destruction in the world, as far as what we consider as it is on a homosexual political state , including partners. yes, you know, this is normal. the normal generally faces the killer. here i have pushkin. i have shchekovskiy. i have a pilot with me. then, in the end, elon musk, i want to talk about it and discuss it. and i'm like this. listen, and you have a liver, where do i need a knife? where to poke? no, mozart what kind of liver where? naturally, he seems crazy to me. on this score , the phrase the victim of the bell, which the survivors said in an israeli school, has become very well very popular. i asked what is the most important life lesson from all this. and she said

, you know, if someone tells you that he wants to kill you. you don't waste time thinking seriously, but not seriously. you react can kill first kill can't kill first persuade because it's serious when we're told that. uh, they say crazy things. it’s just that we are considering the matter from the point of view of the search for truth, and they are from the point of view of where to hit with a knife, genius, scientist, geneticist, nikolai ivanovich vavilov, he knew what to look for, he knew how to act chile and mexico , he found those places where a variety of plants are close maximum. but when they bought potatoes in the soviet union, they knew that they would appear in south america. he finalized his theory about the origin of cultivated plants. oddly enough

, car sharing users are developing vavilov's legacy of the car reports of the incident throughout the country do not cease to fall. you can’t imagine, you wanted a selfie and went. where your eyes look to you quickly one million 31,000 rubles. moscow tretya magistralnaya street is another category of vehicles. we pay close attention. we drove on the left. if you don't notice who gets behind the wheel car sharing. well, i bought it, like on the criminal article

3.27. we are green for this case and conducted our own investigation. nationalist organizations appeared immediately after ukraine gained independence, you are ukrainian nationalists ukrainian patriots, you prepared and fought against the muscovites, it was funded based on western money. external control over ukraine situation

quoted here. at first we will continue along this road.