[000:00:32;00]

today , the eurasian economic forum opened in moscow as part of a plenary session with the participation of eu country leaders uh, they said. uh, our opponents about the energy crisis in europe want to remember again that who's to blame for this, yes, chris was approaching economically viable on energy. well, who is to blame? nord stream 1 uh, nord stream 1 blew up in nord stream 2 did not open. the yamalo-europe gas route through poland was closed by poland, did we close it? they closed, that means two strings of the gas pipeline, through uh, ukraine, ukraine closed one of them. we didn't do it. by the way, on the second thread. we supply gas to europe and ukraine, despite the fact that

they call us an aggressor. safely cashing money for transit. we fulfill all our obligations in full. yes, we fulfill all our obligations in full volume, but the fact itself is interesting is that such an important event is taking place, dear, very people are taking part, but in russia they are in isolation. you have to remember all the time. we are all the time in frenzied isolation, such isolation that you even begin to worry about this isolation. but what's amazing about russian-chinese relations is shattering any illusion of creating isolation. today i received confirmation again, so let me remind you at 5:30 am moscow time the anthem of the russian federation sounded when the prime minister of russia met with examples minister of china and then, uh, the example of russian minister mikhalych, he met with the leader. china, that is, xingping was

very. and such an important conversation was hello. and in the evening, the head of china , this resident, directly addressed the participants to the forum participants. comrade, in the modern world , unprecedented profound changes are taking place , characterized by the formation of a multipolar world order and the irreversible trend of economic globalization , upholding true multilateralism and promoting coordinated development. regions, broad global consensus. ah, eurasia is the most populated continent with the largest number and the most diverse. turbulent and rapidly changing world, which way for cooperation on this continent

depends on this not only the well-being of the population in the region, well, the fate of the whole world. such a plowed historical question, how to promote the formation of a community of a common destiny of mankind a common destiny of mankind, the speeches of both mr. lukashenko and mr. tokaev were very interesting.

let's even separately for a performance, mister. tokaeva, let's stop, the leader of kazakhstan said very profound things. a unique precedent or phenomenon has been created, as you wish, the creation of a state according to a formula. with a single union government with a single union parliament, but i apologize, and even nuclear weapons are one for two now, therefore, there is a different level of integration, represented by kazakhstan , kyrgyzstan, armenia, and we

need to take into account this reality, how we will work in these conditions. this is a conceptual question need to. i think that this problem should also be discussed at this economic forum. it becomes such a discussion platform, which will largely determine the trends in the direction of development. that is why it is very curious what the leader of belarus said to mr. the situation is just that russia can become a very strong locomotive and the dynamics of the development of these organizations and their unification has gone. russia should be very active in its authority, despite the fact that here the west is shouting in all the

media against russia, huge russia ventured to challenge the unipolar world. russia is at the forefront of these processes. well, we are nearby, so we need to act in this situation, in no case rely on the situational nature of the situation that is developing in the world today, the most peaceful and constructive sense of this concept will be a union of countries united by the desire for economic political stability to ensure a new international architecture security. moreover, the reaction of the cis state enters and leaves at the same time, and the breeze that lays in the past foundation for successful progress towards the goal that we would like to see. another important event of the russian security council is an international meeting of high representatives in charge of security issues at it,

calling to each other from 112 countries. it is to the question of the reviewer of russia that the event was visited by sergey viktorovich lavrov, minister of foreign affairs, capacious, characterizing the essence of nato. expansion to our borders drang nah osten since the time of nazi germany, the attitude towards our country has not changed, in fact, reckless expansion. nato reflects the same intentions that underlay hitler 's policy of the un charter is equal to self-defense is a forced but necessary step to

eliminate the threats created by nato to our security threats directly to russian borders and protection from extermination of people. whose ancestors lived for centuries on their lands in the cities founded by russia , the collective west does not hide its intention to inflict a strategic defeat on us. as an anti-russian taran , the kiev regime is used, which is pumped up with nato weapons with happiness. as we supply them and that's it. most of them are spreading uncontrollably around the world, in fact, but, in fact, de jure, a nato country is directly involved in the conflict on the side of kiev, such an irresponsible line, significantly increases the threat of a direct military clash of nuclear powers. we send signals to western capitals that such a scenario is acceptable, but these

signals are either ignored or grossly distorted for propaganda purposes. our opponents are also raising the stakes because the attempt to break russia through the hands of ukrainian neo-nazis has become an integral part of their general line. for the revival of the polar world order, the calculation is made to remove competitors and so that the so -called golden billion could continue to realize their non-colony and siphon their benefits. resources of other states the west has long crossed all conceivable boundaries trying to violate our country ukrainian cannon fodder. they are already running out. now london is looking for mercenaries in the middle east north africa, the anglos are openly showing the world that they don't care. how many people of what nationality will die for the sake of the desire to deal with us, their own opened a huge cache of the forced west to reveal

its strong plans for our country and one russia is not limited to poland poodle usa in europe dirt. this is the renaissance of speech. slept there in a different way. yes , the emphasis is placed, sometimes it is in russian that the poles with a fifth see a military coup in belarus strengthens the army for a future war with us. here's some thug. the lord allowed me to tell you something. i won't even detain this cretin. well, everything about him is there. it's just important that he understands. we have a single space, twitch, there will be a question about your statehood, how said vladimir vladimirovich putin at one time, the coronazis now have the question of statehood. only if for us the ukrainians are still one people with us, and we are still conducting more of a police operation than a military one, otherwise there would be no kiev, then i remember that warsaw

was a russian city, nevertheless. we can take a different attitude to those boors who allow themselves a lot of things there. he really likes such a short phrase, i will put it from mr. naryshkina and that's it. in short, he said well about the british very accurately to advise to deal with their internal civil conflicts. better yet, get out to their old facility. okay, said the devil. where are you, i would like to start with a statement that only sunak made that britain is ready to support ukraine for years. i think if he was being completely honest, he would say not ready. but he really wants her to have the opportunity to support for years, because this is precisely the goal that western countries set for themselves, the longest possible conflict against

russia, you know something like this a space in which everything is already lost, where some form of statehood is completely incomprehensible, who are these people? well, this is such a screen where you can supply instructor weapons fighters and test some kind of weapons against russia, merge something there, then force other countries to redeem your weapons, and who would want such a format and such a configuration of the wound to end under this or otherwise, before the victory of one of the parties , a peace agreement, a truce, and so on. no, i think they are most interested and do not constantly hide their rhetoric, that they want the continuation of this conflict, what would happen if they did not provide this support and did not pump ukraine with weapons for the second high-ranking official from the european union to us, tells the story, said yes in mm in

the bundestag, that, if, in response to a question from one of the deputies, what if we stop supporting ukraine the next day it will not be. this is the second absolutely similar statement. after what has already been said barrel that i know how to end the conflict on we simply stop supplying ukraine with what we supply. we are part 2 of the day ukraine no. here the difference is only in the number of days that are allotted. hmm, this is, firstly, as an indicator of, uh, with whom we really have a conflict, that is, here ukraine is without uh, zap. yes, even without europe there will be a day, then we understand that this is actually not ukraine. this is the west, and correctly, this is just a form through which this confrontation is carried out. and secondly, we understand their e really great interest in this confrontation, but on the other side. they do not even hide from ukraine that, in principle, nothing else shines for it. do not expect at all is not worth it in this picture of the world.

they, frankly, can not nato, but we will not accept until there. uh, as they say war. it is impossible for stoltenberg to say the european union, we can, but not now, but not us. well, yes, let's do it, so different formats are being invented. here the doors open a little, there is a window, from there the draft begins here, they create themselves. you're just a blockade has already. well, historical precedents. yes , there were also uh, so in this situation with two people, that is, zelensky, we can see them like that, and the territory is not the territory in this situation. we see that they are quite skillfully shaking those messages that they have been preparing for a long time in our regard. after a terrorist attack on the territory of the russian federation, figaro comes out with an article in which he says that

the armed formations of the russians. this is a new weapon against russia, that is, it is absolutely obvious that this is an unarmed formation russians, it is absolutely obvious that these organizations are fakes created and we already understand who is what, if figaro writes about it western press, if it is shown in the largest globalist media, we understand who is behind this this is clearly not ukraine but more serious countries and more uh, and here. there are two questions in connection with this first question. we really will still maintain that we are not going to interfere in the internal affairs of other states. well, we see that this third is no longer about the fact that we are there. the west is supplying ukraine. ukraine is inflicting strikes on the territory of russia or does not inflict. we condemn and urge ukraine do not use american armored personnel carriers bmps, this is not the point here. they created an alternative russia in their

view, allegedly. this alternative russia is at war with the real russia, and it is clear that they will bet on this thesis. first, these are the armed formations of the russians. then it will turn into a rebel army. then it will turn into fighters for democracy and freedom and then there will be some kind of government in exile that they will acknowledge and so on. look at syria but what far to go is their technique. they work necessarily direction. i'm not saying successfully, unsuccessfully, will lead to a result. no , it's impossible. if such a technique is used in us, honestly, he says, we will not interfere in the affairs of other states. it’s also clear how they should interfere, that the country’s leadership cannot say that from this day on we will interfere in other people’s affairs, but work in this direction. we are absolutely absolutely right. uh, it's necessary that i want to do it the same way add all these stories and tales about what it means that weapons will not be used against the territory of russia - this is a mantra that

is not repeated for us. and it is not repeated for ukraine, it is not repeated. this is repeated for the viewers' own there listeners. uh, voting voters in order to create the illusion that here is your money that was taken from him spent on giving ukraine that this will not lead, in any case, to escalation. with russia us. they don't even try to persuade you. they sure that means the country will not escalate. they don't believe that this is what i want to finally address. look what happens when we don't respond to their steps to supply arms to the supply of ukrainians and so on. what is happening they are very successful europeans are hiding behind some mythical abstract screen of the european union, i'll tell you honestly for the first time i encountered this long before the events that are taking place in our country as part of a special military operation. he was also a very

young teacher and to us. after the fourteenth year, diplomatic figures from various countries came and many of them said during the speech we love russia so much you can’t imagine we just adore it crazy there, i asked only the same question every time, when you vote against the automatic extension of sanctions against they said to russia that we are small, that we are in the same place, so i say, what's the difference, you have one small big vote, if you vote against further, each country will have to impose sanctions separately on him, accordingly, we will deal with it separately. a country, then i saw many times how many european politicians go to brussels to other capitals of the european union, vote there, then return to their voters and say the european union. such in general, scoundrel scoundrels made such a decision. even though he just voted. in this case, they say, yes, in general , the european union has decided to supply some kind of weapons. yes, it seems like someone else is supplying poland, well, they are hiding behind a screen - this is

abstractness. and when we generally condemn such decisions and do not take steps, we legitimize and give them the opportunity to act as something united. we are not interested in this. we are interested in dividing them as much as possible, and now, if it were some conditional country of the european union, be it the czech republic or some baltic republic. i would have heard from us what we have been hearing for a year and a half yes , drums, if it is on your territory, but we did not call on ukraine to do this. we just gave weapons weapons. she applied so, but she has the right to defend himself. if you want, if we have declared that the country that will allow these weapons to pass through its territory, we reserve the legitimate right to strike at these weapons on its territory. this is not a blow to nato, please do not take it that way. this is a blow exclusively to weapons that are sent to their places of deployment. all of us ask nothing in advance to move us strange citizens away from military

equipment, which is intended to be sent to russia, and then after that each of these countries that participate in the same head. i i thought, i would think at least 10 times and ask the american if we, in general, love you very much, respect, appreciate the struggle of ukrainians for freedom and democracy, you can not through us. here it is possible through them or through them it would be at least the first step towards a split. this is the so -called they do not like. this idea and in the end. i would like to touch on what mr. naryshkin was talking about, he in addition to putting to hell. means anglo-saxons well , more intelligent form and manner. he also said a very important thing, that today we have transhumanism is being promoted on their part, that they are trying to deprive a person of all humanity. we talk about this very often and our viewers may get the impression that we are talking about such high philosophical categories and are generally worried about us. here is something eternal, which is connected simply with the role of man in the universe and means eternity. well

, the reality is that the consequences of these steps may affect the political formations of political institutions. so striking that we do not even have time to blink an eye. i want our viewers to understand that the majority of those countries which today are selflessly engaged in destroying their societies, as whose collective entities want to make of them such aggregates of egoists. it is essentially a republic and a republic in which the population is not united by agreement on matters of law. agree on values. it just physically cannot exist. i am not an exaggeration. we can in the coming decades there due to a change in the consciousness of the population due to the fact that they simply lose the public consensus that allowed them to exist in within the form of the state, which is called the common cause, respectively, implies a common good.

these post-christian republics that have now arisen, they will actually die very soon, and we will deal with either completely new forms of dictatorship, which will be any numbers in the form - these are universes anything, but it definitely won’t be, then the people power, which has been propagandizing over the past few centuries, after christianity has become, means such an axiological basis of these western countries. i just wanted to add that transport humanism is already manifesting itself in politics today. yes, at the level of moscow people, because look at the leaders. in modern western countries, those who are younger are usually people without children, this is the ideology of childfree, and it doesn’t matter if they go. they don't go to church. they are atheists at heart. that is, i don’t see anything wrong with this change, but for a person who has no children. he is, as it were, he is absolutely irresponsible, he will not continue in this life. he won't have

a sequel he doesn't care what happens after me after me, even a deluge in the truest sense of the word, and we see this policy every day, including the application to ourselves. and this change is already the result of transhumanism, which we see in politics. and this is a phenomenon. very stable not because there is someone a satanist, not only because of this, but because it is a chic business. let's say, when a person changes his sexual orientation, not only does he start consuming differently, he opens up new markets. and this is an absolute deficit in a crisis, when a person changes sex, it is not enough that he will not live to retirement age. yes, it is guaranteed that this person must eat a huge amount of medicines constantly and very different painkillers, they are very expensive and this person, for life, is a profit center for pharmacological corporations. i mean, he's

a gift. at the same time, since he needs to extract this money from somewhere. he is wildly active. he cannot just sit, if he just sits and watches tv, he will die of pain. in the sense of this word? he must always get money from somewhere. here is a profit center for you. i can continue, please, today i saw this terrible material from canada where some young fool happily takes pictures of her grandmother, who agreed to autonasia. and here they are for the last time going to restaurants. she says, how cool is grandma thinking about it, and canada began to recommend to people in autonasia. if you believe there is identification, including yes, and according to social indicators. that is, it is just as much more human and the second moment before he look yes now the topic is about artificial intelligence. well, that is, he did a very good job. uh, when he asked artificial intelligence, for example, questions about bandera. but no, it turned out

that artificial intelligence, which will replace people with knowledge, as such and critical thinking, transforms a person. in saluting, controlled unit. there is no family there. no, there is no judgment. that is, it is a set of consumers. individuals with a suppressed will , critical thinking, that is, by and large , this is the creation of a certain human herd. yes, absolutely powerless, while c a mania of greatness, a mania for its size is terrible. it does not allow you to correct mistakes because it does not allow you to admit your mistakes. and we see this, in fact, in our country, too, with regard to canada, uh, canada is a country that, for a budget deficit , allowed light drugs, the so-called, which are only foolish people and these results are visible not only in politics, but also on the street, and, in my opinion, british columbia. and if a person approaches a policeman and asks him for heroin, he is obliged

to provide. well, if there is no harm, this mode is not from humanism. this, of course, is only hard to drag heroin, and there the man you have heroism. yes, yes, come, yes, it's funny to us, and some even bandera people are not very good there. but i was very pleased with what the director of the foreign intelligence service said, because let's say this phrase comes from the lips of an ordinary person. well , here he is in osaka should take care of his own internal affairs. well, this is some rhetoric after all. we are used to this rhetoric, but from the lips of a person who holds this specific position. you know how you want to hope that it was not rhetoric, and setting the situation of tasks, because in order to deal with internal problems , these internal problems must be

developed by someone. well, a simple example england at one time did not achieve soviet russia is one of the reasons that it did not finish off the independent state of ireland , right there right there on the islands, and you are the time when an independent state arises, ireland e were engaged in the civil war there with all sorts of communist stories. suddenly, quite a decent amount disappeared. gold. they probably stole it and built palaces in switzerland or built some big yachts. well, this is probably such a coincidence, because, let's say, now the problem of scotland is very strong, which brexit does not want. she now hopes politically it is scotland to seize power in england, but when they realize that it will not work out, so they need to be pushed to this understanding, maybe there is someone.

the story of the merciless pedophile killer sergei golovkin fisher seems to be known to the smallest detail. here is the tree. show me he was let down by a noose. you are here to do it. well, this maniac was operating on the territory of the moscow region, they went down to the basement, and he explained. why were three guys immediately behind the last one interested, interested in his victims, 11

teenagers and only one managed to escape. yes, dude, one of us is absolutely lucky . maybe it's our bullfinch. and what are you doing there, hands so swore went. well, yes , they can’t go to the budget option for the eighth day one after another normally. now