what does it mean? i don't really need to criticize anything here. hmm, but i think it's important now for us to think very seriously about what, in addition to our pre- school system, is on and other education. we need , uh, a parenting system. and that's education. well, unfortunately we don't have enough. for some reason, we are afraid to raise children. more precisely, not that we, but we are not afraid of it, but the state, but at all levels is afraid, but to talk about the need to raise children and that education becomes important, component of state activity. that's where they showed everywhere they talk about education about the quality of education, everything is fine, that is, the state has a lot of money and some other opportunities for families to, er, give birth to many children there. somehow they are supported. how can this be really

wonderful and good. now there are many different directions there, there are all sorts of mortgages, there is land and other tax concessions there are still wonderful. this is what the state makes emotions. and here's the upbringing. why parenting afraid to speak? as if the family business is something else, and i strongly disagree with this. i am convinced that we should raise children. it is for our country to raise children in an understandable moral paradigm. well, let's just say, uh, respectful to everyone. it may well be built on a base. uh, attitudes towards children, and in terms of our traditional four faiths. in the end. this is not at all difficult, because, well, to think about the fact that in all traditional confessionals there is an understandable view of raising children, take everything useful and correct, it’s all in fact,

very similar to and it’s all done. uh, part of that's exactly the kind of system of educational system. i think this will be very important, because we seriously lose our children when we do not raise them. well , it took us so long to ensure that our education standards approached the western ballon system, this use exam is partially, as a result of this test system. and now we are returning. as i understand it, we are rolling back to the soviet education system. whether teacher training institutes have remained the same as they were in soviet times, it seems to me that now the status of a teacher has fallen so much that, well, i don’t even know about the social package and the level of salaries. here is the scandal that is now flaring up in st. petersburg yes, in correctional school number four on vasilyevsky island. there , it is better for the faint of heart not to listen to this audio recording of children, and they call them names with disabilities,

stupid monsters. gouging - this is just what you can say on the air they were removed due to the interference of journalists. well, just a suspension, how do you think, as a priest. where enough, because there are children crying, no injuries are known at all, then the children will take away their conscious life thanks to such upbringing. what should be the punishment? for such teachers , this is the most important thing, because it is not that this is a terrible situation in itself. actually. if so, i must be extremely honest to say that in general, the situation is more or less. it's just that the situation has come to light. what actually happens in this kind of here are such specialized schools, uh, somewhere, especially in the regions. well, uh, in general, it’s sometimes scary to imagine, and uh, how how to react and how society will react to all this state, in fact, this

is the main indicator, not that uh, these specific ones there will be punished by educators, and there , more precisely, teachers for someone there, well , of course, they should punish, how else, but the fact is that this should really have a very clear internal moral assessment. not from a legal point of view, there is some other yes but from a moral point of view. well, as far as i understand, there are prosecutors, naturally a committee. uh, after the reluctance of local authorities somehow to this on this. pay attention they are engaged in a century. now it's all there. known. okay so. well, of course, a very serious moral indicators of our society. as far as only we are ready to react to such things, as something completely unacceptable. it seems to me that here we have a very serious problem of how the fact that the state is huge, as a system, how car. yes, in reality, in fact, it does not cope with this function, but raising the content of preserving e children, which are so

difficult, so that there are adopted adoptees and so on, this whole guardianship system. it seems to me that a lot needs to be done here in order to change this system. and in general, i think that this is also about volunteering, but about some kind of our civil movement. but it seems to me that in general , very many functions that historically have been taken over by the state for guardianship and guardianship, for example, yes, it can be completely transferred, but to some public organizations by a fund by some kind of movement. muto, who really knows how to deal with children, someone who really loves to do it, so someone who understands and knows how to do it. i just know from my own experience and from the experience of other people, well, how hard it is to communicate with guardianship authorities. it needs to be clarified here. i know you don't like it when i , even before recording a program, divide your children

into your own children and a foster child, but your family has experience. we have many different experiences in our family. here we have one adopted child and we, uh, hmm, have experiences, uh, in our family, raising children, but adopted ones. these experiences were different and uh, of course. well, but now i have an understanding of how everything works and what can really be changed, including the attitude of the guardianship and guardianship authorities to the opportunities and resources of the family, which takes on this responsibility about hmm and upbringing and child care, in our opinion exists, and the institution of guardianship in russia, if i may say so, it seems to me, the main problem is a terrible bureaucratization. and not e desire to make any real necessary changes in the system itself

, the structure of work and relations between the family and the state. for some reason, the state takes on too much responsibility for all this and, uh, in such an eminent, but in a tone explains. it is in the family that what they have the right to, what they have the right to restrict them very significantly, while the state itself in this sense, represented you absolutely know the guardianship inspectors over there or these women who are involved in this guardianship, they cope with this on their own and simply know this from their own experience. here is. eh, here. uh, this inspector or somewhere else, i don't remember. what is the name of. this is their position, yes , women, who have a site where a certain number of these children are located. there are not all families, there are orphanages somewhere else . and so she must combine and look, and so on. yes, they came. here they are, some of them are good and

attentive, some of them understand, and some of them just formally relate to everything, and here the problem is that they really have a protocol of actions, from which all the good that we see from the guardianship authorities comes only when they deviate from this protocol for a second, if a person is good, understanding, but if necessary, this protocol recedes and everything becomes fine. and perhaps something can be done. and if she strictly follows the letter of some formal rule, then at least kill yourself and do nothing. this huge problem. well, just for example, well , i don’t know how hmm this is all with us. well, that's enough time, but, well, for example, uh, a family takes a child to raise, if it's a child from an orphanage, uh, or a hospital that was there for one year or so, then further education in the family goes on more or less well and calmly, and further it can be expected that this child

will hardly differ from other children. if this is a child there from the age of seven or eight years and beyond, then during the years of the child’s life in an orphanage with him there have been irreversible changes that will never make him the same as other children, and this is a myth that everyone needs to sort of understand that it needs to be debunked, because here we have taken an adopted child, and now we will make our own out of it, we will never make it a child from an orphanage will not be fully the same as his own children in all respects. and when a family, after some time, faces insurmountable problems in raising such a child, then a dead end arises, because the family it may well be that it collides with someone the child begins to terrorize the family of other children, insurmountable difficulties arise in the relationship between the child and other children in this family or with parents. and then something needs to be done. the family is not ready to give up the child, and the guardianship authorities

, when you come to them, they say, well, yes, well, let's get you a psychologist for free psychologist does not help. of course , it doesn't really help anyone. then let's say we can't do anything. we can no longer live like this, but we are ready for he will continue to bear some responsibility for this child, to take care of him there, something else , we can return it back. there are institutions there. well, maybe there how many adults there are, yes , there are 14-15 years old. but then we will follow him to monitor his education where he will get a job? he says no. or if you write a rejection of the child, then everything is cut off, the whole story. you don't have the right to see the child anymore, you don't have the right to communicate, uh, and you can't take the next child into custody because you more and more the state has violated this, and more and more the state does not trust you, the state does not enter into the situation and it seems to them that they are on the side of the child, they are actually on the side of the child, because the child is returned to the orphanage, and then he leaves. e into the void. why can't you trust? uh, the family is often some remote care, but

the child? well, maybe remotely, or maybe he comes there for the weekend, maybe the child is there for the weekend in the family. no , you can’t do everything, because there are some protocols and rules that cannot be bypassed, so, of course, with the guardianship of guardianship is necessary. it seems to me that some serious changes must take place in order for these bodies to stop being less state-owned and more humane. tell me, please, why is this just frankly? why in the caucasus almost no children are abandoned. there is generally no such thing as the internet, where distant relatives will take these children. and we have the orthodox. so many orphans, this is somehow connected with the fact that they are muslims, and we are orthodox, firstly, as far as i know, the numbers of caucasians are already large and it’s quite possible to say that the indicators tending to zero for uh children left behind and, uh, can only

be there in two uh, caucasian republics. here, and in all the rest there is already a certain number of these such such such unfortunate children. here it is, but still. yes, of course, compared to our other regions , there are much fewer such situations, uh. yes, this is the first. in my opinion. it's much more, uh, enduringly family, rather than traditional, relationships. by the way, this is about education. yes we have it too part of education. this is a family tradition. with us, it, unfortunately, was destroyed and is no longer at lyatsya no way but. uh, yes, of course, this is a much more traditional involvement of the religion of islam in the lives of people in our society, we live in our e, here are the central russian regions

. countries of the islamic republics, so this is so, but this is just an excuse to think about this and change something here. and this is again and again this topic of education, which we need to think about very seriously , we need to think about it, and we don’t need the state, we shouldn’t be afraid to talk about the importance of education so that hmm people understand that they should not only bring this education, but also to educate them and have to give to children. eh, the correct criteria for the difference between good and evil are the correct criteria for evaluating a wide variety of e, social and life phenomena. and we are not afraid of all this. we somehow start this one ourselves in the family, you understand, the family itself our part is such that the young parents themselves still need to explain to them

what is good, what is bad, what is not allowed there? well, i'm probably not going to mamoralize now. but this is very important, you understand, and the state should take over in some sense, otherwise at least, if not a function, it is, at least, hmm, this is the task of delegating to society, and talking about what they should upbringing to give some examples to give some opportunities for you so that a children receive, really some kind of meaningful whole-hearted upbringing, morally oriented upbringing. it is very important. do you sit behind the situation with children in new territories. well , as you know, the international criminal court even issued an arrest warrant, the commissioner for children's rights under president mary, with his billy wording. the warrant was issued on charges of illegal deportation of children from ukraine to russia, what is happening with these children, in fact, as i understand it, some kind of wording. in general, there are few diodes in international structural. it's interesting, uh, you never know what kind of

papers are written out somewhere, but it's important not this, but the fact that we really are saving children. hmm. uh, uh, the horrors of war and, of course, it's absolute. uh, humane cause and humanitarian duty and the state and society to take children out of the war zone. it is absolutely certain that they need to be evacuated and transported to where they can feel safe. and that's what we should all be doing. i think this is our common task. and even some thoughts that some kind of right there is some kind of right there really, there are shellings there and people live without, uh, some banal communications, there are means of subsistence and so on, of course, everyone needs to be taken out and given the opportunity to live and get an education, and mm, everything else is here, so it seems to me , there is not even a question, but all these screams, this is all speculation on a children's topic. here are those

who, uh, scream and worry and think they're just speculating on a topic that's always very convenient for speculation. uh, kids and their uh, some kind of life. well, that's why no i believe that everything is correct here. and even somehow before all these. uh, here, uh, those with some international ones. uh, somehow there are ships with something else. hmm. and even i don’t think there was any thought that there was any problem in this, where the fighting was going . need to buy early. here, that's all. we help in the church, but to one parish in e in gorlovka and where is this one of the districts of gorlovka? well, constant shelling, and there is almost nothing left there, but still people live there, the temple works there and there are several families with children left and no one just leaves and nowhere, and there it is with

someone of the nation at the front. eh, well, here for some other reason he doesn’t leave. there are 10-15 children left there. well, of course, they need to be brought here and given some kind of opportunity for education and some kind of rehabilitation. what we also do. and i think it's just a general important thing. well, that's all. let's talk about the rights and responsibilities of children. it is a contrast in russia to the west well, for example, in russia, europe but in our country, uh, unlike the same europe, but a woman is considered pregnant, and a child is considered a child from the moment of conception ago, in theory from the twelfth week. that is, in principle, if there are threats there, there is a miscarriage. and so on , a woman needs to be supported somehow in the hospital. they won't do it, in my opinion, even the insurance companies don't do it. and in part, this is also done for this, because now by this time by the twelfth week, and genetic blood tests. they can

tell with 99.9% accuracy whether this embryo has, uh, a genetic mutation, yes. down's syndromes and there are other potential diseases and thus a woman in the west is given, as it were, the right to choose. she wants this child. no, or now she has this period to have an abortion. well, from here and these conversations, my body is my business, and so on, that a child, until it has formed, is not a child yet, and so on, but in the understanding of a christian for the church, when an embryo is considered a person. for any christian who accepts as the basis of their faith the gospel of the good news of christ m-m the only one. uh, the answer here can only be the gospel answer from the moment of conception, and uh, one of the important ones, but there are topics for our salvation. this topic is connected with god's matter from the incarnation of the son of god on which came

from her, e, and we honor this very moment of conception, and the mother of god, e. we honor, as, uh, one of the dominants of our dogma, therefore , in general, in principle , there can’t even be any other view, in general, that is, the life of mankind begins from the moment of its conception. that's all. and the point here is not even oh, the more you talk, and there scientists or some other public figures or politicians or insurance companies can consider something. it's all of little importance. this is all from the evil one, there are no other options. they just don't exist. then you can talk about whether it is advisable to allow abortions there for medical reasons, when you can do a bias here, you can’t do it. you can somehow try to reason with someone, but a, in principle, is basic. eh, it's been that way since conception and that's it, and there's no other option.

have you ever heard women come to you for confession who faced a choice after such a genetic analysis, which said that the child was serious. and before choosing to leave a child or have an abortion, you need to understand that, probably, almost always, when a person comes to confession, he already comes understanding where he is and why he is coming, so such a yes or no question does not arise. yes, it often happens that people come and report that their life will be like this in the future. and they readily accept mmm. well, of course, sometimes there are situations when, uh, a woman who needs it comes to the temple. well, help u in order to deal with this very difficult situation, especially since for the most part, unfortunately, in such situations, u women find themselves

alone, because for the most part u are husbands or men who were accomplices of this e conception. they are left. and the women, it turns out, are completely alone and have nowhere to go. so she comes to the priest and asks. of course, uh, always here you try to find some words in order to support a person and explain to him the importance. e saving life in any scenario, but of course you need to understand that this is a fundamental readiness to save any life. whatever it is, but it is e this readiness is based on the absolute christian view of life, death and suffering. e. and in general, er , the human-human structure of being in russia, as you know, not so long ago, a clause was introduced into the constitution that marriage is a union of a man and a woman, which automatically makes it impossible. and for example,

take a family, but a child, where is the roommate a man with a man or a woman with a woman? yes, but in the west the wife is the opposite. uh, so-called gender mainstreaming is dominating right now. and this, by the way, is not a new thing. in 1997 , the european union secured it with the amsterdam treaty. he calls gender mainstreaming as his official strategy. and we are seeing the fruits of that now. and if earlier they didn’t allow the idea that minors can’t talk about sex change, then now this is. well, it’s just not that it’s the norm, but you even impede it indecently, that is, the child is different from country to country , almost from the school bench for 7 years, yes , these are all the possibilities to choose who he is, a boy or a girl, first to wear clothes, then what he takes hormonal drugs, and

then surgically, he can complete this procedure of transition from one sex to another. and what do you think, what is possible, like a fashion trend. it's just that you know it will dissipate like smoke and will not. this is us already continuation. or maybe it will be like a coronavirus pandemic that will spread exponentially. we need to understand that we are talking primarily about europe in general, not a very large space. eh, our world, the whole world , most of it lives in completely different ideas, and hmm i think that, uh, everything, that europe is now modern europe does it for itself and arranges it. well, such a road to nowhere for europe and, probably, it can dissipate it with smoke. like with smoke, when some kind of explosion occurs, then smoke after this explosion. that

's probably the same when all this somehow changes. hmm, or even smoke. it will dissipate and maybe something new will grow. although, of course, i doubt that this path is on such a surface, i am convinced that this is all much more dangerous than building up. there are some military capacities or something else , these things that lie at the very foundation of human existence on the one hand. we can say that europe is small and hang steel world. he does not accept this, but on the other hand, he understands that in fact europe is a legislator for a large part of the world, and it is not just a legislator. but what is being introduced there will then be extrapolated to other places in different ways. well, go far. no need for the unfortunate ukraine that we now talk a lot about and hmm recently. it was known that an agreement was signed between some

european american educational structures on the basis of which, uh, here this is ken darkness yes, darkness is introduced as there methodically. yes, it’s not that it’s somehow methodical in general, that is, the lieutenant gives a methodology for how they will raise children in this sense, they give a very correct path. they are raising children. they don't educate. they introduce through the toy through the game through the uh, some other situations, things and this is their uh, upbringing. therefore, all this is very serious and very, very, very dangerous, because, of course, what will happen next with all this is hard to imagine, but thank god that our country e stands for completely different positions and there are really a lot of such countries, and hmm and here, probably goes. maybe the speech of his latin america and his e large number is strange in southeast asia, so here probably

for the whole world such a danger globally now, probably, does not yet exist, but as a trend, of course, this is very, very everything, a not even alarming anymore, but very tragic for the whole world, we have violated some uh basic laws. yes, we have invaded, and those boundaries have crossed those boundaries that a person has no right to pass from the point of view of medical ethics of erogenous engineering and other things. yes, the man suddenly realized what he could do. what he actually does not have any ethical moral right, and he pushed this right along with christianity of course, and, uh, further man. suddenly he realized that he could change gender, change chromosomes , add a third parent, and so on and so forth. all this, of course, speaks of that liberal always permissiveness , absolutely terrible, which, well, destroys certain

basic foundations of our world. thank you very much, father alexander, for answering our questions and coming to us more often. thank you.

it will be the honest detective.

donetsk volnovakha yasinovataya today again came under fire from the apu under the fire of ukrainian militants also in the belgorod and kursk regions, one person died there, and in the tver and pskov regions , drone attacks on oil facilities were not injured, the crew of the ship ivan course, repelling the attack of british drones in area of ​​the bosphorus is represented by the state awards. turkey is preparing for the second round of the presidential elections, two candidates with almost equal votes, the decisive