of course, keep going. that's enough point of view. i'm here. yes, i also think that we need to make changes to this decree regarding the use of preventive measures . you also determine. here you have the vision to put forward the conditions for this application so that they are unconditionally understandable, 3 years ago there was a different situation about the four points that are there, they, in principle, always assumed the responses of a counterattack of one separately, taken by the dean. we have already reforged 100%, after advertising. let's see what was there it turns out.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective. we watch to explore the world of educational programs and documentaries we watch for free without registration.

because if there are weapons, like directors for god's sake, because for now nuclear weapons are an element of deterrence. naturally, not common weapons, and in equal quantities it has speeds, therefore containment. as defined in this decree. rather, there is nuclear deterrence, but it is carried out constantly until the beginning of application

nuclear weapons, the beginning of this use of nuclear weapons is clearly spelled out, we must have reliable information about the launch of nuclear missiles of ballistic missiles. this is the first second second problem, which here is the impact on critical state facilities, the destruction of which will lead to the fact that we cannot respond, the third problem is the use of nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction on the territory of russia of its allies. and now the last paragraph falls under what you are talking about now, it's me aggression with the usual weapons. in the event that when it reaches such a stop stage when it threatens the existence of the russian federation, do you think that we are now on the verge of the collapse of the russian federation. i think that when strikes are made on our territory, these are not threshold categories or not? well,

let's read these. how does it sound when the very existence of the russian federation is threatened, war is now declared, of course you think that in moscow you think that strikes on the kremlin are not a threat, existence on our country. you think that a conglomerate of fifty countries, facing the task of destroying our country, is not a threat. and you are in danger. when will it be, when a nazi kicks open the door to the bolshoi theater, and the plan for the seats of russia has always existed, but correctly in this form, as you know now, yes, in relation to the last time it was a blow to moscow by a foreign state in relation to the fact that forty-three . well, how to say, if in the ninety -ninth year thank you abroad, then we are not sponsored or in direct foreign state? here is a direct foreign state of ukraine that was carried out, which

was carried out by the americans, substituted technologies, the british helped to work with this foreign state. we don't even care, we don't care. the word war is written there. it says in the fourth paragraph the word war. or it says a threat to the existence of existence, the correct word is war. it says no thanks a lot threat to the existence of a lot of existence. as a result of either military places written before it is written in this paragraph the threat of a noun was written when it raises a threat to the existence of the state in the event that aggression against russia is attacked on its territory there are conventional weapons. is it right when you consider our states? no, do you think that we are now under the threat of the existence of states

within one year we have reached the point that our state can collapse. for example, i think so, i have, on the contrary. it's exactly like that. no, of course, yes again, because a person exists threatens the existence of our state. now they are creating threat, but there is no state threatening or not? no. hello hello existence is not threatened. you didn't read zelensky's peace plan then. yes, outside of zelensky's peace plan. sorry then. you did not listen to the speech of the leaders of germany france great britain then you did not see the mousse's decision about our president. you haven't seen the conferences that set the tasks of what we will do next with russia; they directly declared war on russia to destroy. they can declare whatever they want, they can

rhetoric, they can say whatever whatever our state has enough views. there are that 10 drones of it to the brink of existence put a little drop again, there is no phrase brink of existence. there is the phrase existential threat. they pose a threat exist the existence of the state does not exist now hello does not exist. yes, real threats are when the tourist system and everything else is destroyed, when the right to use nuclear weapons, medium nuclear destruction is threatened by the russian federation, and also in the event aggression against the russian federation with the use of conventional weapons, when under the threat of sanctions the existence of a state

sufficiently powerful and moreover in the far east where will you say the borders, and i believe that we are bombed by our sorry ancestral lands. and that our citizens of our territory are being killed. this is an existential threat to our state, then declare- let's declare war and move on. we are considering the points of application of nuclear weapons of the phenomenon of war in conditions of war. stop, where it was written about the conditions of the war. there is no the conditions of the war. i don't remember. we can apply the 11th point nuclear weapons and nuclear deterrence, whether nuclear deterrence is in effect before the start of the use of nuclear weapons, and nuclear weapons are used in this way 19, in a different way. correctly , i listed these points to you, where war is written there. it is written there saying that they

directly threaten our existence, they threaten if they now wait a minute, if they, for example, took and blasted with drones, which would be a dirty bomb. everything is fine this means that the eleventh point nuclear is carried out continuously in peacetime during the period of an immediate threat of aggression and in wartime until the beginning of the use of nuclear weapons, wartime is introduced according to the law on defense written in the period of direct threat of aggression separately and during now the period of direct threat of aggression. do you have doubts already aggression goes already goes and that's it. aggression is coming. everything works. i'm going. honestly. i say, i look. it's like a local conflict considering the operation, because doesn't announce anything. on this paragraph on the tenth paragraph 12 12, and the mail building on

the potential patent of the russian federation of the investigation territory and the adjacent russian territory of groupings of general purpose forces, which include nuclear weapons delivery vehicles. everything is on the basis of this, martial law is introduced in accordance with the federal no, these are the main military dangers that can outgrow the goods, that is, it is not said that the court declares martial law. do you think it's now in jeopardy? the existence of the russian federation they are a threat to the existence, for example, the soviet union was when the germans attacked it and approached moscow no, but military defeat in the country, by the way, was carried out only in the western regions. these are the concepts of threat and martial law. i don't understand put because, well, closely related no. here is open doctrine. we opened. read

the articles, we read everything as i say. no, not how to interpret the doctrine. i do not interpret will. something hurts. we are now under the threat of the existence of russia russian spoke understand to the law. look, only then are we here so you consider it. weapons leadership, so it does not consider you understand, yes, because even listen to the legislation. we live in our state. we have been in the country passed, partial mobilization and looking for men. so it is assumed. it was carried out for 300 thousand rubles, again,

there was no partial mobilization, in general, it was described anew for the law. in addition, we have different levels of middle. threats based on what we have it is used in different provinces with different powers. no. you can take a position close to the ostrich to do if nothing happens. tell the guys there is russia, so the governor's throat will go shelling every day and say no, no threats. there are no threats. tell you people who are there every day. under the shelling of the threat, there is news of the existence of states, so it is, what is it like 50 countries, among which, with joy, nuclear weapons carriers that are here, what are they talking about directly put. systems that can be used to launch, including nuclear weapons in this case, means our guidance. it's just shortsighted. you see it,

it does not see us leadership. they just weren't hand in hand. why are you always thinking up your sleeve? i won't think of leadership, because why do you decide for leadership. i don't decide for him. what are you doing, why should i decide for him? i'm looking at what our management is accepting is considering the situation more than seriously seriously what sergey lavrov says the neck is there, but there is no threat to the state that it is not. if there is no threat. what for then to carry out partial implementation? why then the driver of the special regimes of the border regions. if there is no threat? what are you talking about then the threat to the existence of states do not dwell on the threat, just the threat that the existence of the state there is a clear fourth again, you read the roses of the state, the december memorandum read putin what december memorandum. which one is december 15th? yes we are why because

then we began to say that the threat to the existence of our state is the approach of nato infrastructure to our borders, when time passes for seconds under the ice and for minutes 100%. that is why this is a threat to the existence of our state. that is why we were forced in december to say that the guys remember, stop , there was already a threat to our borders. it is a threat. and now there is already a direct intervention that carries out various crazy things. let me remind you that the battles are now taking place on the territory of the russian federations in the regions that voted, that voted, yes, which are an integral part of the constitution of the russian federation and start dying with you fellow citizens in any local conflict, our fellow citizens die judges, we adopted the wording

local conflicts, which you have 50 countries, because the local conflict is long 1.000 km. the chief of 50 countries are fighting o indirectly. how do you understand? but what difference does it make that it was a joke, that 1,000 km in a row, to the panfilov villagers, kryukovo, what was a threat, or what do you think? i do not mean it i say. i spoke about the fact that the use of nuclear weapons has always been considered as a fall of the last hope of our doctrine, they are considered. of course not, if you want with the original weapon. yes, you say weapons tactical nuclear weapons do not imply deterrence. well, that is practically possible. that is, tactically nuclear weapons, if such expediency arises here, yes, now progress is already citizens. we are talking about nuclear

weapons. i never once used the term to strategically support a lieutenant general. explained very well different types of nuclear weapons, for example, right now yes, let's say they will rush, it's clear what they will do, but just put buckets there. there is a cellular connection so that our people cannot communicate by telegrams there. how to communicate. in response, we did very simply carry out, for example, an explosion of an air satellite constellation. the dough becomes a blind mask can work today, yes, that the mask has already arrived in china, there is talk and that's it, not a nuclear strike of a ton. and what is it when washington is not such a clean border that washington except there pennsylvania than washington such museums the museum will not touch the museum conversation

andrew washington we will find targeting strategic use you have never used nuclear deterrence no tactical conversation i have a tactical one again i say. here, i believe what is written there was written i launch ballistic, where the word leaves was written in the first, and reliable information about the launch of ballistic and them. you're just saying there wasn't. no, there wasn’t about us about us wasn’t that we should have been with us with us there is hypersound, with regard to the use of tactical and tactical nuclear weapons. we have already made changes for a while, because we moved it to belarus. i also say here the position is a little different, because the promotion of summer on foreign territory or from a legal point of view. this is the territory of the union state of the point

of view is still our weapon in the territory. yes, our weapons are still there, but tactical weapons are transferred there, you understand, i will say this is how the product goes there. what products may be strategically used we can mark our line here. if for example they supply f-16. we can use this weapon. we can designate this as a type. you see, it seems that this dove of peace has finally grown iron wings. well, there is a little bit of progress. although there is progress, such a heavy and heated discussion, as if we have a big problem here. i'm still not that radical. how are you, like andrey viktor, something about the relationship of nuclear weapons, i think the president will really decide when else to use something, but uh, what

certainly captivating performance drovik cheshu, he speaks frankly and says what he thinks you have to say. now, if we had a russian civil bureaucracy, military deputies, many would speak like this, but it was ideally a different story, you understand? well , unfortunately, we have been brought up over the years. uh, the bureaucracy is very, as it were, devoid of any initiative; here we feel at home. i'm not not so familiar. uh, that’s all, for the fact that when he urgently served there, yes, andrei viktorovich knows better, but he doesn’t admit that in the army it’s problems. there is a lack of initiative. as they say, it's better to remain silent? this is why the army is a part of society. i think it is present. i think that's exactly what andrei viktorovich probably had in mind when he said that it is necessary to change inside . that's all. and as they say, and

it seems to me, this, uh, it's very important, because if people like andrey viktorovich spoke, otherwise my deputies would say so. many are so, it seems, as if silent, not some kind of this or or trying streamlined is everything. we observe in our society, therefore, this is what they buy the most about, uh, nuclear, so to speak, but i would not be in a hurry. and by the way, not a throne bomb. it’s like we have everything at the nuclear facility, including hydrogen. we have everything, but it only made us screw up not so radically, by the way, there is fuck. me well, i won’t be drones now, everyone

has already talked a lot about this. that's all, of course. that is, it may not be clear, but i can’t add anything new to this. maybe it's related just with the fact that there are not enough people with initiative, like andrey viktorovich, where they should be, but what i paid attention to, in fact, this is this story with the return of assad to the league of arab states , this is generally a very serious moment, this a serious defeat, in general by the west and the americans very seriously, something like that. well, yes, we kind of talked about it, but i would pay attention that this is a major defeat. well, listen, they have been doing everything for 10 years to destroy syria and especially in general, and how would they practically achieved. and look what is happening. by the way, this is also the result. this is what we call experience, because it says, but in general, well, they don’t want to obey

, the arab east no longer wants to obey. that's all, apparently it's quietly quiet, but, but this is happening, this is a very important event. so i would pay attention to it. this, of course, is serious. you know such a russian achievement. because russia initiated it at the time, to be honest, it seemed that it was losing at that moment. it commanded respect, but it seemed to me that it is a losing situation that we will not be able to do this. there was such a moment, because you remember, this is the whole, including the entire arab world. everyone chased him down. everything seemed to be the end. well, look, this is what you know. here, despite the fact that there was a huge force on the other side, they failed. here they are for siri to handle. and what is syria in general?

a small country, devoid of everything, so to speak. this is very important and a point that i would like to draw your attention to now. and i can't not say that you understand, well, another demolition of memory in poland well, it really hurt me, i can’t tell me about it, my father is a front-line soldier who went through 2 years, purely fronts, he is no more, crimea took the baltic states of belarus, but in general, in general, i think that we should have said something more it is significant that we are terminating any relationship with poland, but it is impossible. this is not a betrayal of our parents. well, you know, it's impossible to endure, or they have to

restore all these monuments. moreover , manually, manually, not with the help of tractors, but manually collect them to return, or it will break with poland forever. well, it's already 600,000 soviet soldiers who died in poland , our soviet people. but this is generally everything, i understand everything, polish polish complexes. everything, i understand this, but there is at least some kind of it, it seems to me that somehow it needs to be more rigid.

faith is one of the symbols of this faith now the monastery of m. prohibit it as a matter of fact, whoever desires you our world.

stanislav director gilyarovsky reporter his method of working on himself. i really want to visit the trick. this is a very dangerous place. i myself do not go to a trick without brass knuckles look. killed

first darling, straight flew me incomprehensibly

all my life you live. you are man. you are a healthy , strong, hard-working mother with a stroller for tomorrow. i can not tell. we will cover death with a bucket of our passion and we will send other coordinates.

in this sense, i see, it’s at home here, it seems to have accepted there that at least we ’ll stop letting their cars through, although they ask what we used to think all this all this had been going on for almost 10 years there. this is the growth of the polish here this gono.