let's find where to stop on the video, endless you can watch the video endlessly. just choose beeline dragon on your side.

they said that russian troops were advancing on the maryinsky direction of attack, there were assault detachments and the fifth motorized rifle brigade and a special forces detachment. ahmad intense fights. they also go in the avdiivka area. aviation operators and artillery fire of the western group of forces continue to carry out special operations, the affected enemy units in the areas of settlements, timkovka, birch bark kharkiv region from yermakovka luhansk people's republic in the areas of settlements sinkov as kislivka of kharkiv region and rozovka of luhansk people's republic of suppression of the actions of three

ukrainian sabotage reconnaissance groups per day in this direction , up to 45 ukrainian military personnel were destroyed three vehicles self-propelled artillery installation acacia, and also they say d20 army artillery aviation, and heavy flamethrower systems of the grouping of forces center inflicted defeat by a unit of armed forces of ukraine in the areas of settlements. in the area of ​​​​the settlement of the criminal lugansk-people's republic, the actions of the ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance group were suppressed, the enemy’s losses per day in this direction amounted to up to 80 ukrainian servicemen, two pickup trucks, a self-propelled artillery installation of a carnation and a d-20 howitzer . the republic destroyed the ammunition depot of the 125th territorial defense brigade. in the donetsk direction, a unit of the first army

corps are fighting in the avdiivka area of ​​the donetsk people's republic assault detachments of the fifth motorized rifle brigade and special forces detachment akhmat continues to act or actions in the maryinsk tactical direction operational-tactical army aviation artillery fire, the southern group of troops defeated the enemy’s manpower and equipment in the areas of georgievka settlements lastochkina and tonenkaya from the leninist republic , up to 395 ukrainian servicemen were destroyed in a day in the donetsk direction, one tank, two combat vehicles infantry three pickup trucks, as well as two howitzers d-30. an ammunition depot of the armed forces of ukraine was destroyed in the area of ​​​​the

settlement of the donetsk people's republic up to 120 ukrainian servicemen, two cars, and also robbed in the footsteps in kherson direction, as a result of fire damage , up to 20 ukrainian servicemen were destroyed in a day, two pickup trucks, a combat vehicle, an rszo vehicle, a grad, and also a d-30 howitzer. operational-tactical army aviation by missile troops and artillery of groups of troops of the armed forces of the russian federation during the day hit 103 artillery units of the armed forces of ukraine at firing positions with military equipment in 149 districts of settlements, seversk of the donetsk people's republic and gorka, zaporozhye region, the affected teams observation posts of units of the 81st airborne brigade of ukraine and the 108th territorial defense brigade with air defense means in the area of ​​​​the settlement of lavender.

andreevka, zaporozhye region, a su-25 aircraft of the air force of ukraine was shot down. 16 rockets of the haimars, hurricane and alder multiple launch rocket systems were intercepted in a day. in addition , 17 ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles were destroyed in areas of settlements, a playground, kuzemovka, makiivka of the luhansk people's republic thin. and georgiyevka of the donetsk people's republic, in total, 430 aircraft, 235 helicopters, 4.47 unmanned aerial vehicles 424 anti-aircraft missile systems, 9.352 tanks and other armored combat vehicles 1.105 combat vehicles of jet systems took fire 4.954 guns of field artillery mortars, as well as 10.000.587 units of special military vehicles. today moldova hosts the second summit of the so-called european political community. it

created at the initiative of the president of france to coordinate the actions of european countries and for a closer dialogue with partners outside the eu, including chisinau, we will discuss this and other topics with the first deputy head of the federation committee on defense and security for russian representatives with vladimir alekseevich hello. let's start with you in chisinau, what do you think about this format? good afternoon. this two-day advice is not the first. it really was the idea of ​​​​the president of france , the current macron, in order to create some an informal , uh, uh, political club for leaders, and a number of european countries and, uh, as if sympathetic, but european politics, and there, in my opinion, 40 odd countries, as a result , 47 is the last figure involved.

i don’t know if this figure is taken into account, who refused at the last moment just yesterday, and the president of turkey who was announced there, but in the end i decided not to go there, which means that no decisions are made there, in general, such. uh, a party, and everyone comes there, apparently with their own goals with their own tasks. well zelensky do you understand why he is coming? ah, for example, the leaders of armenia and azerbaijan in this event. uh saw this was obviously talked about at their previous meeting. moscow saw the possibility of a new stage, not a bilateral, but a dialogue on a settlement. eh, problems between these two states,

of course, you are specifically waiting for the results and whether this will be a new attempt and maybe expand the anti-russian coalition. i don't think this attempt was successful. and if we talk about, uh, about this format, in principle, then how any non-universal format, be it an american idea of ​​​​summits. e democracy , of which there are already two, in my opinion, has gone like this, and this is a kind of, by the way, also competition, but with the biden at the macron. a and. uh, since there is no disciplinary element in this event in chisinau, it is not visible, otherwise to say that this will lead to some kind of strengthening of unity on an anti-russian basis would be a clear exaggeration, uh, and with an increase in the significance

of this party. by the way, speaking about macron's initiatives, he proposed. in paris a peace conference on ukraine, it is probably planned to involve brazil, india and china, and some other non-western countries there. uh, how do you think how workable this format can be and is such a discussion even possible without the participation of russia no, of course, by the way, brazil india china, he did not mention either russia or ukraine do you understand, uh, the president of france, he is a creative person explicitly, so it generates a different kind. uh, idea initiatives on a regular basis. uh, but if you compare this with those practical, but actions, which are being undertaken in paris, including in the ukrainian direction, that is an obvious

gap, that is, good wishes, but, in fact, active participation in anti-russian. yskoy coalition, and in the supply of weapons, uh, to the ukrainian regime. and so, frankly speaking, with a certain reserve , i would attribute them to this initiative. what do you think? now, if you are discussing, uh, a peace initiative? what could be the format? what should it be in your opinion? well, you know, uh of course, you can talk about some kind of peaceful initiatives about successful measured initiatives, but about negotiations when the participants themselves are ready for it. and you are obviously aware of it, our viewers are well aware of the adopted, and in ukraine the verkhovna rada

passed a law prohibiting the government and the president. and some kind of ergo to enter into any kind of negotiations, and with russia to uh, known, so to speak, their demands and the withdrawal of all russian troops the return of all territories and so on. that is, this is clearly a dead-end position, so now let's talk about a specific format. well, it probably would i don't want to say that it's never too early to say prematurely, but it's only too late. and well, count on the speedy achievement of some kind of negotiated settlement. i think if so far it would be difficult. and vladimir alekseevich, sergei lavrov, said that london is directly inciting kievka to carry out terrorist operations against russia. you , uh, agree with this assessment. well, london

has been known for centuries already, uh, by similar actions, including in the russian direction. not only, but mainly am and uh, here's a topic. uh, so popular in the west, uh, and in kiev, these are supplies. uh, f-16 fighter jets. louder. everyone is told by the british, what do you need? yes, now we are ready to train. how to train where on what, but there is no british armed forces, not a single aircraft at 16 they have ever used them and do not use them. so here the position is clearly provocative, in order to first knock out other allies in e, hmm in nato and e, it was possible, for example, in relation to the netherlands and denmark which are a. took over

the corresponding digital obligations in terms of the number , and the aircraft that they can provide, well, uh in general, and the position of london uh, but we remember, uh, not only in relation to ukraine, but also their other tricks on the anti-russian path. uh, and slavuts, uh, the case of the violinists hai or laika. a and. uh, the subsequent ones did litvinenko even earlier, remember, but, that is , the british also have fantasies, she doesn’t dry up about her by inventing all sorts of anti-russian projects. and how do you assess the statement, which is increasingly being heard that kiev has the right to attack russia on the territory of our country? you understand, uh, these statements

were made from berlin in the first part, uh, but uh , the most uh amazing thing about this and terrible. i would say this is what it is an attempt to present. this is acceptable from the point of view of international law. since when did the use of force, but became legal, uh by international law, unless we are talking about, uh, response to actions about defense, uh, and protection, but of the territory itself, and therefore , uh, this is clearly an inflammatory statement, a clearly provocative current overheated. uh, let's just say the atmosphere. so there is no other explanation. alekseevich in july at the

nato summit should provide ukraine with a very powerful package of political and practical support about this. today at the meeting of foreign ministers. strange. nato said the us secretary of state what do you think it could be? well, i would not like to guess, i will focus on those publications, as they have already appeared in the public domain, and obviously, it will not be about the admission of ukraine to nato. i think everyone even understands this in kiev but what can rub is about raising the level. uh interaction of interaction formats, and so far it is uh, this format is uh called commission, ukraine nato he and he u provided for certain a connection of uh ukraine to various kinds

of discussions within nato and participation in the partnership for peace program . and now, judging by the publication of the speech, maybe ah, well, it would actually win ukraine at the level of interaction that russia had at its best years. and if you remember the advice, nato russia which was created, and in 2002 and formally, by the way still not dissolved. although the working one does not work. and so it’s such a, uh, sweet bone that they can throw zelensky for u further experience. and if we talk about the next stage, as if in this e, the leader, but outside,

that is, in nato, and this is the sda than the plan, but for membership, i think that on this account, at least. i hope that individual reasonable voices still exist in the nato collective. eh, they survived at least out of a sense of self preservation and at this step they are. uh, i hope they don’t go, maybe it was about some incredible help of some new military support package. well, you understand it is necessary. there is no budget. it doesn't have its own weapons , strictly speaking, uh, there are half a dozen avaks on the balance sheet of nato, and a few more are glad. and so everything else - it invests broadcasters

and, accordingly, the decision is made by member countries. it is clear that the decision is collective yes, but material contributions are a matter, but strange. what do you think, is the increase in military spending worth the topic? increased military spending just what are you talking about? remember the story about the two percent 2% gdp is that, er, the level that the americans have been trying to get from their allies for many years since the days of george burge jr. and this is a requirement. uh, washington formulated at all nato gatherings. ah, at that time, i remember well, and this threshold exceeds

just the united states of course, in great britain and greece, where the main military spending, uh, was directed to confrontation with turkey and estonia well, here are the americans, uh -uh, is this so on, and what about in the old days there in the era of the cold war, and the united the states spent e, or rather financed 50%, and now nato’s spending is not enough after a in the post, but the soviet era, and in e, during the e decrease in armed confrontation in europe , many european countries, including nato countries, have reduced their wars

expenses. now to the united states. you have to pay 70, and sometimes eighty percent. and this, uh, they considered wrong, and now they consider it unacceptable and, therefore, allies are required, and moreover, a new moment should be raised. this is what these 2% by the way on this the level is far from being out yet. but now it is no longer considered a goal, not so to speak, uh, the level to be reached, but the minimum level ahh, which should be. eh, it is desirable to exceed so will raise. what do you think, and you know, this is due to the economic situation of the countries concerned, and the economic crisis, and he doesn't ask. how much do they count? uh,

it's possible to spend on this or that, so uh, the demand is such a political appeal, it will certainly be but how real uh, the economic economic possibility of individual member countries will respond to this, uh, we'll see. uh, obviously this will not happen right away. another important issue that may be on the agenda, as far as i understand, is sweden's accession to the alliance. how do you assess the prospects? but taking into account the fact that you decided not to go to chisinau erdogan. so that's obvious, but obviously this issue is coming soon uh breakthrough. uh, it won’t be in it, but we’ll see in july there will be a summit, it’s necessary in vilnius, i strongly doubt that any progress will occur before that. hmm, vladimir

alekseevich, another issue that i would like to consider from the point of view, including the participation of the north atlantic alliance in it , is the situation in kosovo e. how do you assess what is happening and how do you see the prospects? you understand that what is happening in kosovo had to happen sooner or later, because all this is a system built by the nato members of the european union. and i, by the way, too, uh, she, uh, by and large, is not very viable, because uh, 10 years ago, 10 years ago. uh, with the mediation of the european union in brussels, it was an agreement was reached between belgrade and the marina, and the creation of an association of serbian municipalities. this is in the north. well, and that

10 years have passed and there is nothing, in parallel , the european union is the same, but actively, but promoted the idea of ​​a political dialogue between belgrade and the partisans. yes, this dialogue is sluggish, but it continued, but without solving this question, which, by and large, uh, would be the implementation of the minimum requirement, and the serbian side in this case, the consular serbs, and uh, belgrade, of course, supporting a. e about securing your interests means that they did. but now , uh, the last weeks, and the near-stena authorities held elections. uh, the municipal elections in four municipalities in serbs decided to boycott these elections, because until

the association was created in these elections, they did not see the point, so the elections were held with a turnout of 3.47% uh, and at the same time, elected mayors. uh, that is, the election results of a member. e normal that elections were held and e mayors in these municipalities. uh, almost on tanks they were imported with the help of the ostovsky special forces, which, in accordance with the changing was not entitled to agreements. vladimir alekseevich appears there, i apologize for interrupting, in principle, i think the viewers of our channel remember, how the events unfolded, an interesting forecast. do you think this will escalate into a full-blown conflict fighting and will it become such a hot spot in the center of europe i think the level has reached this level already. a note that westerners are forced

to intervene, because they cannot afford themselves now against the backdrop of what is happening, including in ukraine, but they can afford it. uh, so that this conflict gets out of their control, so the americans, the jesovites, have already pulled down their jackets. uh, well, i, uh, i'll see how it will be, uh, these nato forces will, uh, react to the situation, it is clear that there will be attempts to blame, and in everything, and the serbs, if not in everything, then at least put some of the responsibility on them. a. but uh, as the situation develops further , the situation remains tense, and in such an environment , some additional spark is enough to get it out of control. now let me have more. the question is more related to

our internal agenda, but nevertheless, including, let's say, an international echo. uh, after the drone attack on moscow, the idea of ​​introducing criminal liability for photo and video filming of air defense operations is expressed. well, in general, do you think yourself? is it worth making such a rule? uh, a question for you, as a senator in the first place? question or what is the work of air defense and if we are talking about serious responsibility , be it administrative or even more so criminal , then it is necessary to clearly define, uh, what is the subject of regulation. and if a man he sees, uh, so to speak, a shot of some kind or a rocket launch, but and, and the liquidation of a drone, if, uh, they take a picture , it means, and if he goes somewhere, uh,

the location of the air defense units and starts u photographing them and let's geolocation, then this , of course, is another matter, therefore, the question is, uh, said on the fly under a hot hand, probably, it is not worth solving. as i understand it, the example that you called the second and now e will entail. responsibility , including criminal, that is, that is, a debatable question, i correctly correct you understood. therefore, on the next one, i thank you for answering the questions for taking part in our broadcast. i remember. we spoke with the former representative of russia, first deputy head of the federation council committee on defense and security hello and vladimir , a savings card, the most profitable in the country , a new interest-free period of 120 days begins every month. make purchases. return

money. so again and again, a free forever super bet of nine eight percent. apply online or select and benefit every day from a new part of the climate equipment with a discount of up to 40% without alcohol tested german fish according to the classic recipe of non-alcoholic german quality. megapowers will make your tarik more profitable to run for a favorable tariff. activate them in the megafon app. well, we

have the first drug, the second one, too. and the third one is available in a dosage of three and 10 mg. why such confidence with the honest sign application? find out which pharmacy stocks the medicine you need. and this is exactly the state labeling system, an honest sign. rest assured, i am often asked how to prepare for vacation, st. petersburg just pay for purchases online using the st. petersburg button, you only need a smartphone.

i'll find you a daily ru where to stay. new baltika author's solution non-alcoholic original varieties of two masters selected solo, author's roasting aroma of bread crust and caramel notes on the palate. baltika author's non-alcoholic solution two masters one masterpiece at the beginning was a word, then we were the first to launch sms, we were the first to connect the connection in the subway and rose above all so that you communicate not only with words, but also with pictures and circles of rice. and if you need words again, say them looking into your eyes.