[000:00:00;00] the enemy launched a steeply large-scale offensive in five sectors of the front in the south donetsk direction; the introduction of 23 and 31 mechanized brigades from the strategic reserves of the armed forces of ukraine into battle, with the support of other military units and subunits, in total , six mechanized and two tank battalions of the enemy were involved; the enemy’s goal was a breakthrough our defense on the most vulnerable, in his opinion, sectors of the front. in their tasks. the enemy did not succeed, did not have as a result of skillful and competent actions the losses of the eastern group of forces of the armed forces of ukraine amounted to more than 250 personnel, 16 tanks, three infantry fighting vehicles, 21 armored fighting vehicles. commander of the joint group of forces chief of the general staff of the armed forces of the russian federation general of the army and gerasimov during this period was at one of the advanced

command posts in this direction i just wanted to continue my thought, but if we have excess exports that we cannot reduce for various reasons that they are busy thousands of people, although we explain that you are not a big problem, do not immediately do it, firstly it is impossible, but agree to gradually balance imports of exports. ok then. why not a step? what to see what our enemies are doing, and our enemies have long been doing and creating storage facilities on a global scale. why can’t we within the country together with our partners create on the territory of our country, there can be not only world-scale storage facilities certified not only for hydrocarbons, grain to anything what we have in abundance and send this excess export to the wrong place to store in case we need to sell it, and before that it releases the necessary money for the development of our economy. but this is also a mission that frightens everyone, but this is a target mission already, in the end,

provided with ready-to-sell export goods. well. do it, it's there according to different reports. well, conditionally, yes, two trillion. we will set everything up there , again, not in a year, but we can do this and create new prerequisites for functioning. in including the new macro-region, not only the needs of our own country, but our allies, but the same can be done more, then it needs to be done further. we are talking to you, but let's unite within the framework of the brix and offer at least. well, okay, not currency, yet. let's have a calculation mechanism. come on, we will finally start not in dollar terms to calculate the goods that are traded on the stock exchange on the stock exchange. why on the exchange of those countries where these goods are not produced? are they listed there? come on, this is no longer listed with us and it will support other. and this, accordingly, will be the first step, proving that it is possible to take into account these goods in the same unit, and thereby come the monetary unit that should be created, so i’m finishing. i

want to say that we need to redo everything and we need to start with our own heads, and especially with the heads of those people. those who are involved in the financial and economics, i will digress a little from ukraine. although i agree with you that we need to answer from the kharkiv region, we need to do something, a good option, really warn the residents to let them go and, uh, well , because otherwise they will go. then they will turn the belgorod region into the donbass . i mean, the intensity of the shelling will simply iron everything in the belgorod region, and people will be forced to suffer. this week, in addition to this blinken speech, which i'm not going to touch on, there was another one, but this keynote speech, uh, that evan baden's national

security assistant to america made on friday at the annual meeting of the american association for the control of weapons. by the way, a very influential organization that brings together very, uh, many members. uh, all kinds of uh swing tenks. uh, an ngo in our opinion, which deals with arms control issues. i have to say that e. sullivan gave a speech there, i would say , with a program on the uh issue. not so much arms control. how much nuclear arms control? i have to say that the americans here, it is felt they heeded? and they started to worry about the use of nuclear weapons. weapons, but because in the world of e is happening e, here is a discussion about the possibility of using nuclear weapons. she's gaining

momentum. and when the president of south korea was on a visit to the united states there, very much attention was paid to this issue. koreans are already directly south koreans are faced with the question that they are ready to launch their own nuclear program for the americans, the washington declaration had to once again confirm the guarantees that they, so to speak, adherents will always protect with all possible, uh, means and the submarine will come in and i think strategic bombers will land on south korean airfields, well, a petition has been launched in ukraine. uh, i think at the suggestion of the ukrainian authorities about passing a law allowing the deployment of american nuclear weapons on the territory of ukraine. i don't think that the americans will take such a step uh and begin to deploy. nuclear weapons in ukraine well, that they

can turn a blind eye if ukraine launches its own nuclear weapons program, i admit it. in uh, authoritative american, they will have a nuclear weapon that they do not use it right away, well , first of all, of course. e, in order to create a nuclear weapon takes time. uh, i think, i think we should have beaten them by now. well, well, at least a year, uh, there is no ukraine, uh , all the components, uh, that will allow them to create nuclear roles, they have some of them. uh, enrichment technologies. they have ura but they have, but they don't have the whole nuclear weapons production cycle. well, i'm talking about this and say that they can give on the sly. let parents have eyes warhead, there are carriers, yes, that is, this is all real. in general, already in this a! in

the journal of atomic scientists , the question is already being raised there. in general, what is the difference between e, a powerful or high -power projectile, in conventional equipment and a low-power nuclear charge, i want to say, for reference, so to speak. e of low power in modern conditions is considered a nuclear charge of one and a half. kiloton, up to 20 just in case 20 kg - this is so baby, which was dropped on hiroshima that is, this is a charge of low power. so, uh, what did he say? uh, sullivan sullivan well, first of all, of course, he accused of all the sins. e russian federation that the russian federation uh. here the basis of nuclear arms control is cracking, russia is to blame for everything and the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant was mentioned here and the agreements with nv that russia suspended its participation

in it and undermining strategic stability. although i really hope that our foreign ministry, uh, was promised that on saturday it would come out with a detailed, so to speak, detailed reaction to sullivan’s speech, i’m waiting for sullivan, because , uh, sullivan’s entire speech is on this a solid lie for everyone, and here are the theses of strategic stability, the basis was three treaties, the missile defense treaty was 72 years old, the americans left it just like that , it does not meet national interests , and the entire inf treaty went under pressure. with a new pretext , they accused us there of having made a rocket. this is not the range, although we ourselves violated it, we told them about it for 10 years that they violate the treaty and the cis. yes, we were forced to suspend it, because we are practically at war with the united states. this is a peacetime treaty the conditions of the war. but who will abide by this

treaty? so, uh, sullivan blamed everything on russia, moreover, he told everyone that the united states is, so to speak , the leader in all non-proliferation efforts, starting with the theological convention chemical convention non-proliferation treaty. although everywhere everything is blocking the partial agreement. uh, the comprehensive nuclear test ban has not been ratified in line with blocking all final reports on the npt. bioconvention blocks the verification mechanism under the pretext that in their chemical pharmaceutical industry will intervene. uh, the chemical industry created this attributive mechanism there in order to accuse russia and syria there of using nuclear weapons, although they themselves remained the only country that possesses

chemical weapons. so here are the two main theses, firstly , we will step up efforts to modernize our nuclear triads, moreover, we will step up efforts to develop new types of weapons, including cyber weapons and weapons in space , with the exception of anti-satellite. what are they they are afraid. here is the anti-satellite, and everything else is possible. at the same time, he proposes to start a new round. um, well , first of all, to return to the performance of the cis of the russian federation, and the united states itself announces that they mirror the russian federation and will also comply only with the levels. so what is next. eh, he says. why are we something the russian federation is worried about during the cold war. we, despite our

disagreement, negotiated agreements. how is the current situation different from uh during the cold war? yes, everything is different but there was no such russophobia. well, there was no such question. uh, the soviet union needs to be expanded and destroyed. uh, so to speak , destroy the leadership and so on. that is, uh, and again, it's all a lie that they, uh , concluded agreements. when we had aggravated disagreements, so to speak, all agreements were concluded in the seventy-second year brezhnev's visit to the united states - this is detente. there with nixon. uh, the rsmd is gorbachev . perestroika of the strategic forces is again gorbachev shevardnadze. that is, all the agreements were concluded , so to speak, when we had more or less, a when uh were unprofitable, yes, and when we entered yes, it’s not that the cis2 agreement that they launched in 1991 did not

have time to sign snvd-1 sn2. it generally provided for the destruction of all our heavy missiles with multiple warheads . this is the backbone of our squad. if this were done, we would be left without , uh, nuclear forces at all , so the speech is ending . indignation, and this will not help, because our audience already knows that sullivan is lying. here i am watching her euro. they say that they are shelling here, the city of shebekino well, ukraine says that it's not them and it's a lie. so you need someone to shoot the martians or something, cretins because of the european union, false sales cheap stuff? i am a disgrace to the european media, but, as i

understand it, this is such a refuge, including ours, i run, i like to take them, in fact, i must speak frankly. there is, there are all sorts of various structures that have nothing to do with the media, these are branches. western intelligence and treat those people who come under the guise of journalists. it is necessary that they are not journalists. now we see how our fugitives are. who accepts? yes, all this jubilant gopota, all this bastard, mike-nacks , ivy fedungal, that’s all, it doesn’t pronounce, nonentity , that’s all that used to stink on ekho moskvy, and i, when i said that venediktov was a traitor , agents of foreign intelligence. when i say this to me, everyone said, no, what are you, why? well, why are you listening? i told you who here created an extensive network of his spies. you are agents of influence of the western

intelligence services, who have now returned to their masters and continue their work. but this fungus rotten-toothed boletus still sticks out here and receives money from one or another around. state structures, so that there is an illusion of what? well, learn to deal with enemies. they are friends. so their affiliates live this will help their affiliates greatly. here they continue , they understand. it's all possible, supposedly a journalist. well, stop lying to the kremlin office, behind which this creature was taken by hand , each handle must be disinfected. you have probably already raised the topic to such a level that it is difficult to develop it further, although i will try here. it was just said about the central bank

well, yes, in fact, if you're just on objective facts, look, they are engaged in sabotage, they are sabotaging the orders of the president, they are sabotaging the policy that was. declared but let's look from the point of view. here are the managers so to speak. now, if i were the director of the cia, who would i be with? started working in such a country first of all? like russia, i would first of all start working with people who hold money. that is why we have a whole galaxy of the best central bank executives awarded at the highest level for their loyalty and i don’t know if they got cookies and jam there.

besides that, but nevertheless . first of all, we worked with them, and i personally know that at a high level there are people who are now spoiling us and working for them. and then of course you go to the press to those who form public opinion that this is how the central bank is done, well, it is necessary, because this is the strength of the market, the market will come out, right? this means that you forget your own goal position. forget your own strategic planning. you do not have the right to set goals, because as soon as you start talking about your own goal setting, the status of a sovereign entity. but our status as a sovereign subject de facto

began on february 24, 22. after that return to any other status. just in basically, we can't be at war. and so, when we have some more. inside the bodies that still refuse to take sovereignty into their own hands and engage in goal-setting for the good of the country, and not goal-setting, but they are actually engaged in goal-setting, because if you are not working on our goal, setting you are working on goal-setting market, which is controlled by it's clear who? this is me. and now i would like to say a few words about blinkin, about salem, about everyone else. so that it’s just that the people who watch us understood the context, who these people are in general, why should they understand? that's when

blinkin says or they themselves say they have a split personality, this is a purely anglo-saxon trait, it consists of two components. the first is always seen only by their own interest, nothing else worries. his interest is everywhere from his garden business to politics. they are for their own interest other people's interests of morality. this is all this is all different, and the second is a split personality - this is from the fact that in their there are two sides to culture; there is an inner side, where, in principle, one can speak the truth. and the outer side, where it is not necessary to tell the truth, where there is such a thing as image. this is the image, it must be maintained. anyway.

he must be here, when the same thing, when you ask e, that is, it’s always fine , how are they, how are they doing, it’s always fine, because in no case can an anglo-saxon culturally say that he should keep this image badly successful person. a simple example, well, it's no secret that families have disputes and moreover even fights. there are i love you. this is the same thing, purely a bridge to politics, that is, there is a public speech. and there is what blinken said that we all love you, we need

to live well with us, and so on and internally, where they actually talk about how to fight with us between them. and here we should just calmly abstract from it and forget everything that we hear from them, because it is simple. just a slogan that they put before themselves. i honestly don't know where the red line is, i don't know, but i wanted to to look at everything that is going on so to share. this is on three levels, so that, again , for our viewers, listeners, so that they generally understand what things come up when we start talking about red lines. and what can our president think, that's why it's clean, well, they made such a conclusion. we understand that 50 countries are against us now. this is

a huge power. there are more of them than us, their potential is greater than our potential. this must be recognized in order to defeat them. we need to build a very, very clear strategy and the most terrible thing about it. i about it already said is make a mistake. which then cannot be corrected, which means that we must. to understand how they think in order to pre-empt them and prevent any surprise when suddenly they have some kind of trump card that we did not think, and against which we are not ready to provide some kind of antidote. here, for example, what is the error? well, for example, let's say get involved in poland

ready to end the war somehow. well, i don't know , with a decisive blow, but simply to turn it into a war further beyond our borders. then it turns out such a game on three floors and the first level. that's just purely strategic and where i like to fuck the president the most of the time he devotes. this is, firstly, a change within our country , the readiness of our country for this long and difficult confrontation, the first, and the second , the formation of another world. where our enemies will not have a majority and will not be able to influence the majority that will now be formed, and this is the most important

theater, in fact, military operations. and here thank god we have a good time working for us. and we see how the countries go to the breeze, we see how the second level is going - this is the military level. this is the level. this is exactly what is happening at the front, and the third level is important, painful, but by and large . i think the least significant is this squabbling in social networks and all the stuffing that happens, which is easy to plan on. it’s true, we take them very seriously somehow, but we need an antidote, we need it so that our immunity has already developed for this such a big people. and we realized that everything is smaller than we are, it is smaller than our task. it's smaller than our ideology. let's stop listening to them. here is the gesture. it seems to me that for western politicians this is some kind of symbol of the times, here this is what the macron did. i don’t know what leg he

started with, but it seems that he’s not on cocaine and he doesn’t thump. i do not know exactly. yes , but he told bratislava that some time ago the president of belarus, i almost literally quote his administration discussed with whom it is not clear the issue of joining us. that there is, in general, who knows alexander lukashenko , in any case , to imagine that the question is understood. it is technically impossible from the right political and organizational point of view. but here we are talking about saleman, who lies, he meant tikhonov. he is there, he twisted it out of this, that maybe we made a mistake in the twentieth year, of ​​course you made a mistake. well, what a false star you did, your all agents were revealed, that is, i wanted to quickly. and why, by the way, in the twentieth year there was a false star in belarus, because they prepared for the twenty-second year. they wanted to seize the belarusian foothold in order to create better conditions for themselves. here, so that it was, and not because they

believed in some kind of movement there and lost. and therefore they often regret it, they think it and there are such stuffing. well, it's not so harmless , this is the strategy that alexander lukashenko told vladimir putin, they will now try to quarrel. to quarrel, uh, and belarus well, it will not be possible to quarrel. well, at least to plant some seeds of doubt, you know, or see how they are performing. atakaeva has already been slandered from all sides at the eurasian forum it is just that the president of kazakhstan did not put it into this speech there. this is deliberately in order to destroy the relations of the russian federation with its allied partners. see how they any hint. china, as it seems to them, to move away from supporting russia simply exaggerates this is their tactics, but it is part of this term again, i will use frustration. they especially the europeans don't know what to do. why? where do all these contradictory

statements now come from, uh, there is a community in moldova, this is the european political community, which ended with nothing major events. uh, that's what orbán wanted may from santa to kiss his hand. she jerked her hand back and began to discuss, - she says - wow, this is the largest feminist. a fact in recent years, and if she had given them another plop, - she says, oh, it would be well done, that's the whole result. where does this frustration come from, we emphasize once again russia won the spring campaign of this year, released, artyomovsk postponed the dates of the offensive, which were 100% planned hinged ukrainian, because they realized in the course of reconnaissance in battle of other events that it would not be possible to break through the defenses, they switched to these provocative actions in the belgorod direction on others and the europeans understand that they have what they expected, that now this counter-offensive will begin, somehow it will go, it won’t go, it doesn’t matter, and they will go over there to some kind of negotiations. e s- to some steps. and now it turned out that the next stage of the political, from their point of view,

regulation cannot be achieved without escalation. they are afraid. the americans are pushing these 50 countries into this furnace. they are terribly afraid of this, therefore an absolutely contradictory statement. yes, you suddenly began to doubt and said, listen, he says, in general, putin is not a single war. he lost, he says, yes, and soviet tanks were not so bad at 60 - these are years and macrons, these statements make this one come from exactly here. and here it is very important, of course, the meeting was held in minsk heads. uh, the special services of the cis countries, and there was an interesting event, about which margarita simonov so modestly mentioned alexander vasilyevich bortnikov awarded. no, my paws, what, i just don’t have enough information for you either. you see that e bortnikov awarded belarusian intelligence officers. this is one question. why was it made eye-catching? and they went some about the same said the chairman of the kgb

ivan chertin and went. in general, almost semi-official clarification of how it happened. it turns out that this was such an operation valkyrie 2.0, according to which not only coordinates were established, but everyone knows where the fishing island is where to hit this headquarters goura. eh, here's this budanovsky. some people say why don't bankers hit? why somewhere else? because it is necessary to beat when the leadership is there, it will simply destroy the building. yes, it is symbolically beautiful, but there was a moment when there were representatives of the leadership and some scouts who seemed to be awarded, and the blow turned out to be very sensitive, to put it mildly. prior to this , the situation was incomprehensible to the zaluzhny, because no matter what happened to him, he did not suffer. clearly the blow was struck at the time meetings of a large e-e military command of ukraine and in one case and in another, the data,

apparently leaked from the bank. that's what we're talking about. and how are belarusians involved here? i don’t want to say that it’s worth remembering once again that podoliak worked in belarus for a long time and how he then left for ukraine. well , it’s too obvious, too obvious, that’s not what we are talking about. in general, probably, there are some other figures. well, probably, if it were so, the sbu and others would have been arrested far away. well, he must have been tested 150 times and i passed some kind of lie detector there, and the tests can be completed zelensky's task how to get rid of potential political competitors who are too active in the public field, and what the tinned and the budavny have, and there were political ambitions or depending on their condition. well, for example, remember this intrigue when they wanted to remove reznikov as the minister of defense. she is his instead of someone, it means the same budan, and all these terrorist attacks are his personal pr-political campaign, but this is their

showdown alexander lukashenko is very important accents, uh, placed on the future in the post-soviet space, here, uh, it was not in vain that he cited the example of mikheil saakashvili, uh, saying to the post-soviet leaders through the heads of the special services, guys, don't rush, don't fuss, don't run somewhere. you think about the future. what the example of georgia says for a long time georgia was presented to us as wow, just a picture of a super successful country in reform. they have there, either the ministry of justice or the ministry of internal affairs made of transparent glass, they dispersed the traffic police there and it turned out that there allegedly they don’t take bribes, and it’s just that the picture of the world is such a showcase of this western way of life, which is not an institution after the soviet space, which turned out, then, that simply corruption was transferred in increased volumes to another level. it turned out that behind all this is the destruction of the industry. it turned out that there were some new