and excuse me, my hair stood on end for the expression, this is how ukraine did it. i have another question. and so this is for false, maybe their iso and what, i have another question much simpler. and how ukraine dragged several tons of explosives across europe to germany well, the question is generally a lot. why do the german press write like this? no, it's such a simple question. look, i am answering, finishing my analysis, i am answering you directly. here in ukraine in the future will definitely not live. uh, the piece of iron will definitely not live minister of foreign affairs of the current defense, a secretary. this is the safety of daniil , who suddenly woke up today, he says, he knows how he either thumps heavily, or smokes well. he is irrelevant today . no, if already, if western pressakists. yes, vladimir vladimirovich

of the water is good to arrange an experiment. how will this piece be? what am i really asking? these are questions that are very uncomfortable for the west; therefore, they never ask them to anyone . so you remembered the storm. yes, now ask her do not understand. why about to ask this, well, everyone knows, russia yes, they took the envoy of the pope into the storm again. he's making excuses right now. for this was his italian press ask. why did you go? if it was in russia that you later gathered in russia, why did you have to go to this very storm? and so on, but uh, ask now where they creaked. and what about the investigation? they don't even understand at all. why are you revisiting this old story? well, we heavy lightly already announced us -

a diplomat sent sanctions led to something there even these deal with this, and i read from the kakhovka hydroelectric power station, now e messages from the western media are constant and e, i watch their stories and you know what amazes me. here they have at first, here are some newspapers, like a bill. yes, they launched that russia blew up, then they backpedaled and did it, but in general, here, uh, basically. what stories today, do not turn on western tv channels or what newspapers do not open like in the headlines so basically. uh, well, here, ukraine accuses russia yes. well, that is, they lead, as it were, to the idea that rather highley like or russia yes, but it seems to be some kind of mini-media itself, such a statement is direct no , with rare exceptions. well, at the same time, they launch their regular commentators further. this is the bbc from today's horse hay and so on, who are not

personally. i'm sure it's russia. that's the way and sort of, as you know, and you can't dig. yes, explain it to them, so that food in kiev stands there against the backdrop of the kiev-pechersk lavra. no, personally. i don't even doubt or from the canyon with the military to survey. no, personally, i understand that this is russia and so on. that is, the viewer of course, all the experts from all sides say to him no other alternative is given to him. yes, not well, of course, russia, but at the same time, you see, how they play such a game, as if tolerantly with a certain one. uh, it means pluralism of opinion, and at the same time you open some newspapers, there the financial times generally talk about the fact that, uh, this is a matter of course. russia has been hitting targets all winter. uh, infrastructure and power plant. so, just in case, in their own way, they don’t explain this to readers that it certainly didn’t provide electricity to

ukraine since last year. definitely. this question is not reported. you understand, that's all, like nowhere, in fact, nowhere in this news does e quote the same general from washington post last december, whom we all kovalchuk yes, of course, his last name. he bluntly admitted that yes, the hymers inflicted several trial blows by the americans themselves. that is, we understand that america is well aware. uh, if she herself did all this, well, at least she coordinated. no, they don't quote at all. although, i specifically looked on the net. yes then when this interview came out, there were a lot of reposts, a lot of reprints with headlines corresponding to what ukraine meant to strike at the pokakhovskaya hydroelectric power station then, it seems like no one hid it. nobody condemned ukraine then. for some reason it didn't seem like a war crime to them. and now well, here's the logic, risha, suna da yesterday, when he said, if

it is confirmed that russia means it's all done, then this is a new one. i think so. well, let's keep thinking. and if it is not confirmed, and if it is confirmed that ukraine does not exist, what are you such assumptions cannot even be allowed anywhere in any case and eh. here, or i was especially amused, of course, by the reaction of the norwegian press today, almost all came out on the front pages. there is a portrait of putin, the gap of this very hydroelectric power station. well, the destroyed hydroelectric power station, to be more precise, that's all. well, everything unequivocally sums up the thoughts russia blew up. russia destroyed. i just why do i follow the norwegian press? yes, from the moment when hersh, er, seymour herosha , published his investigation, where did he prove that in this operation of the americans, e, units of the norwegian army participated directly. yes it would seem that for the first time norway, like this, should have been heard by no one a word from these norwegian newspapers,

not like on the front page. i didn’t find it in printed versions, even there there are notes somewhere inside there is complete silence. and then the next day they already know what it turns out to be. you see, russia did all this. it turns out that this is the main news for norway. well, when re iota of the norwegian army, this renders the norwegian public not interested at all, and here, please, uh, and in this regard, when you show zelensky, you know, he is there a lot, of course he said. i also tried sincerely to understand, in this, all the conclusions of the construction, in fact, in fact, what he said, in the fragment that you and vasily were just analyzing. and, that is, he does not trust western partners, so to speak, he understands that he will be thrown in the end. he says, give us guarantees, because otherwise the leader will say, my people are tired. that you understand the logic too, yes dependent. you always owe me. yes? for you it will be hard for me

spit on your audience for that will become your economy will get tired, your public, but you owe us, but the most important thing that he said, in my opinion. he says he is joking, all these peacekeeping initiatives are already good. he says, mind you, after all, we are talking about the fate of russia and they are discussing what will happen to russia, so as not to offend russia and so on, but he says zelensky says an important addition, it's good that they are finally discussing russia but after all, at the expense of ukraine suddenly and it does not suit him. the poor fellow would know. did he just say stoltenberg what is most important today is to ensure that putin does not win, that ukraine is preserved, as sovereignty, he will face. he was not a stone, yes, a fin dance of fish and that ukraine will remain as a sovereign state, because otherwise, if ukraine does not have the opportunity to exist as an independent sovereign

characteristic of the eldest in europe, then there will be no subject to discuss membership at all. means, admits, yes, such variant precisely so there is no person. no, there will be no ukraine as subjects for discussion. you they asked why zelensky is so nervous about vilnius well, the answer is obvious to me uh, when ukraine, together with georgia , was rushing towards the plan, the achievements of nato membership expected that they would receive it in vilnius, but not in bucharest, billis. vilnius was then e , it seems to me, there was an association. there they tried to push through this whole story, but it's all the same it's all the same. e, clearly remembers then

vilnius e opposed this story germany means france for all that, despite the fact that the baltic states poland everyone was for it, but nevertheless everything burst. eventually. well, i’m not talking about the fact that yanukovych made a sharp u-turn in vilnius at one time, in general, the place is so significant for ukraine and definitely not the most pleasant, so zelensky’s jitters are obvious on the one hand. yes, so on the other side. if you go back to hmm to the dam, well, of course, now i want to say that, well, something like this was to be expected. i will tell you. to be honest, i've been paying close attention to what happened in the spring along the dnieper river. and here the pool said that these are characteristic spills. yes, nothing like this for a long time already, in the spring there was no flour, all the more,

dnepropetrovsk did not experience such serious underflooding, which were just this year and there were serious drops in the water level entered on a. rain and something else. well, it rains every year. and such a difference. well, to be honest, i don’t remember exactly, because in dnepropetrovsk the whole district was flooded. and most importantly, to be seen that it is it's just such a kind of water level game, and even then i just had a question. and what for what? so, maybe, so to speak, trying to compensate for some power on e, electric. no, it doesn't look like it, because the differences were too strong now it was clearer. now it is clear that this one was so serious. uh, long term plan. uh, they really delivered systematic blows to e payment. and anyone, as it were, even e well, who studied physics in the eighth grade, then the dam is all the time a structure under pressure. yes, there is a question just how much pressure it is. yes what is

the strength of the dam? there was an explosion, there was no explosion. now it doesn't even seem to be that important. yes, well, it’s clear that this is constantly shelling , constantly deformation. and the game of this pressure along the channel, rivers. and i remind you that the cascade consists of six reservoirs, kakhovskaya is the lowest yes, and six ladies you open the damper here, here the flow damper increases. well, simple physics for the eighth grade, but it is clear that this is a muddy wave. e. after the breakthrough, she swept the whole information space. and vladimir vladimirovich has already given an example. well, i have the most enchanting one. in my opinion. an example of an explanation of what happened means that there is such a structure of the institute for the study of war, such a state department. uh, the grant history in which the ukrainians work means that they, so to speak , interpret every event that takes place on the line of

contact every day. here's what they wrote about uh, what happened here is valuable, just every sentence, almost every word, because everything is wonderful, of course, there is also the possibility that pre -existing structural damage to the dam. ultimately, they led to its destruction from heating, as some sources additionally suggest. at present, the institute for the study of war cannot give a final assessment of responsibility for the incident, june 6 cannot give the final price, but it believes that the finest thing begins next, that the balance of evidence of reasoning and rhetoric suggests that the russians deliberately damaged the dam, which is the very thing. the main thing, as in any news report. in the end, ahead of this one, but the balance of the rhetoric of reasoning. i've been such a masterpiece for a long time to prove that the balance of the ring

fields. and what, to be honest, here i share and, uh, serious concerns. well , in general, every person who lived in kiev knows what is happening with the non-break, knows about the cascade, but you know about the state. and yes, not only not only kiev but not progress also bursts regularly every spring. and what more of all this whole story, of course, frighten. so you asked, and what will happen to kiev if it is destroyed, the kiev lady, this scenario has already been played many times and environmentalists all say that a wave will rise, there from 5 to 7 m high, and it will definitely wash away the hem. obolon where the metro lived and either the coastal part. and kiev and it's like just more flowers, because it's not the biggest big one. yes , but there is also, so to speak, the neprovsk reservoir. in this whole story

, of course, i was most shocked by cynicism. after all uh, all these stories mean the ukrainian side that the russian did this on purpose to prevent our counteroffensive from crossing the dnieper. well, any military man who listens to this, yes, then he calls natural questions. if you were going to counterattack across the sky, then why did the tanks ask them to under the boats. yes, for example, europeans. well, that is, to force the dnieper . well, i just kind of grew up not propetrovsky, where there is a diorama forcing one rule. i just understand, some kind of large-scale military the operation was then back in the last century, yes , the great patriotic water. how many wars are there? how many peoples have been swallowed up there now, when this is a transparent war, when everything is visible , the movement of equipment is to imagine that here they are quietly falling to mean , farce, and so on. vision. although i'm not a military man, yes, but i put the logic. this was well understood. yesterday

budanov appeared on here, now he would have disappeared. yes, valera, where was silent, sat sat. valera may be fake . hmm. i'm just worried. yes, i understand perfectly well. what, what, what, from my point of view , the crossing of the dnieper in the kherson region . yes, which means, exactly , uh, a small resource with the final resource that they prepared there. he probably wouldn't. in reality, this means that when demolishing the dam, you understand that they will be flooded. there are dozens of villages. they absolutely calmly something that would create a huge number of people with massive problems. and they understood very well to possible human casualties it means, only one thing is clear, that uh, south-east of ukraine and kherson region. for them, it’s just not their own

for a long time, because they understand by definition, but if more than half of the city left with our troops, yes, last fall, then they understand that these are completely unreliable people, absolutely unreliable people. yes, they will definitely never be real ukrainians, so they can be easily written off. here's what might happen next. yes, six more days, five ladies, five reservoir, what kind of military expediency, a tinned one or any other of the ukrainian military leaders will have a head. one can only guess in a month, several months and so on. but the fact that they are ready to sacrifice people is what dmitry said, what exactly do not care. of course, we showed zelensky at a press conference. on the occasion of the journalist's day the most statements on the occasion of the day. journalists in general sounds. it seems funny to me when we talk about a state in which journalism has died long ago. to issue a decree to celebrate the day of the propagandist, but even here there are problems , because it, uh, could have been memorial day

for journalists, because, well, you can propagate some idea, yes or the ideas of some leader, but here i am i just listened to one little story that you showed in relation to iron , you know, if you watch it without sound, well, you can imagine that some person is trying to explain something to some other people, but in fact, in my opinion, on the contrary, he is not trying to explain, he is trying to lead people into some delusion from which there is no way out at all. here i am just quoting. yes, i am sure that we will be given the strongest security guarantees and the following. i don't want us to be left alone with russia, what does this mean that zelensky says in one phrase that i am convinced that we will be given guarantees. and in the other he says, no-no-no, i'm not convinced that we are on the road and potentially. we can be left alone with russia well, it doesn't matter. if it will be so, then it will be so, that is what it means that a person is not ready to fight for something that

never happened. well, at least. it seems to me that there is in this logic. this further he says, this is all this is all. that's literally. uh, everything goes in a row, but uh, i think this is a betrayal of politics from the point of view of certain partners. i apologize, of course. maybe i missed. i can't, i can't remember. it’s just that you don’t remember where when, in what place , in general, the smell gave an oath to zelensky or ukraine. well, there was such a case, here is the west . i swear. i'm ready to swear by blood that we will not give you at all, well, a person who has already entered for 4 years can understand that politicians are guided by no e, oaths or assurances, or that they are guided by their own interests. and he continues this, which means that you are afraid of coming from russia and still want to earn money economically. of course, i beg your pardon. so everyone wants to earn the only person who does not want to earn. this is zelensky well, here

you are, here are these four statements by zelensky how can this be understood? generally normal? how can this be understood requires? that is, he says that i, you want to earn, but i do not need to earn. why don't i have to work, let's say, and i'll come. i’ll ask you, and you give me, but you look, you don’t earn money with russia well, you give me money well, i don’t see, there’s absolutely no absolutely no uh, logic, and you with other questions regarding nato and vilnius , i am absolutely convinced. unlike zelensky, he is absolutely convinced that there will be no nato membership in the next once nato buys off zelensky, it is possible that they will again promise some financial support or give another package of weapons and tell that the doors are open, that’s all . eh, filmed finished. you said about the losses of ukraine, you know vladimirovich , the rate of losses of ukrainian soldiers is such that soon there will be a lot of leaders who will have to look for indians. you see, the indians are running out.

that's what they bring up, and these are our armored vehicles jumping up, they are still unloading from there, when we are human resources at all absolutely. it absolutely does not count at all . here. absolutely, when we talk about the kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station yes, when we talk about bakhmut and so on. you understand, i think the whole idea of ​​the west is that this territory it was originally not ours ours it never will be. we will not control it, so there are two options for resolving the issue: everything that can be burned must be burned, and everything that can be drowned must be drowned. here you need to understand, based on this, there is no other no other goal for the west in this situation not politically persecuted. yes, if there would potentially be an opportunity to solve the problem that the west set for zelensky and the ukrainian army about the possibility of liberating, as they say, parts of the territory and entering the azov or black

sea, if this could be solved. they would probably agree. well, since this cannot be solved, it means that ukraine must either sink or burn in the fire when i mentioned it. why did zelensky refuse to speak? section, i want to remind you that the russian language existed even when the previous time it spoke, it was one of six languages. won, and they were used and documents were distributed in russian. and uh, everything was translated into russian into russian, the broadcast was. that is a prerequisite. i mean, that's how it works. and uh, now it sounded absolutely like such an attempt to leave like a snake, as igor mark likes to say here. here is an attempt to leave. here it concerned absolutely not this reason. i mean, it was just frank. here's a jupel, which here i am, here i am , such a peacock's tail for you and that's it. no, that is, he did not hear support. he didn't hear support from biden. he did not hear support from the kyrgyz. he, and did not get any hard. uh, the conclusion that ukraine is right russians. ah, so they committed crimes.

it was gone. that is, at this time, just before his performance at the service station. kirpi. he said, he says, you know, we don’t know, that is, we don’t allow it. we need to understand more, but how would the americans understand. we know, yes, that is, 10 years have already passed with amx so far, right? well, this year there will be 10 iraqi facilities until then the search is sorted out. yes, yes, and that's how it dies and the people who touched it die, as if it were leaving, so there was no hard support , it couldn’t be used, like butch , everything didn’t work out, therefore, zelensky says i want to climb there. yes, now i’ll go out again, as if, then she still gets cuffs there, because he understands that it’s not benzine sitting there. there are some other people sitting there who may also be indifferent to his statement. here they also threw it up, and erdogan threw it up. but he turned and says, let's have an international we will create a commission and investigate. let's find out let's find out. who did blow up? this is well done sultan on time. yes. that is, he says, look, the americans don't know . the british don't know, he says, let's find out.

come on, we, as intermediaries, will come in , take it, find out, open an official and official talk, which means zelensky’s negotiations with erdogan, and there is not a word that he complained. why were the russians bad? yep, that's what he says everywhere. yes, but about the creation of a commission somehow. no, it didn't work out. yes, because in commissions can quickly reach themselves. well, in the end, what to figure out, if we know something, if ukraine knows, if ukraine asked you to provide visual control from all sides during delivery, the data for this minute that ukraine provided provided. no , it didn’t, so we didn’t receive this international support, so zelensky realized that we didn’t need to go there, one small nuance. remember at the beginning zelensky when he became president, but literally after a short period of time, he first said, what is proud that i live in my house. i do not need anything from the state, and then quickly much. he sold everything moved to the state pinata. who it turned out that he had an apartment in london has this, well, it was a trifle. well, in the crimea it was in the crimea, it was like, yes, that is, here, but

everything has already been nationalized. no already. well, the fact is important here, but zelensky doesn’t have such an asset on the territory of ukraine, practically, as assets, he doesn’t have it. london as far as the apartment he did not sell, where else could he invest money i know where he nipples gave hundreds of millions of dollars on crows of money. i also don’t know the offshore account is indicated, there are all cases of investigation , which he also spun money through his money, kolomoisky’s money, and he didn’t hide it much and not much and he didn’t hide his own to the butchers, as if yermak doesn’t hide much. everybody knows. they know that they have millions of dollars there. that is, it’s good if millions are hundreds of millions of dollars, they are not located there in ukraine, and therefore, when we see what is happening in ukraine, that is, we understand how they relate to this land, how they relate to this territory, so absolutely do not care , do not care, the period will pass. we are going to live. where it will be, where it will be possible to live, so

now you know. i've seen a lot of things in my life. i saw zmerchaevsky there , yes, that is, i saw explosions in the mines. i have seen explosions at large enterprises. i saw in luhansk, in the end, which surfaced, which flooded. yes, and i saw the hype around this, i don’t see it now in ukraine i don’t see the hype in ukraine now, and colleagues that they suffer greatly there, that the number of people they have been deprived of their homes, someone is drowning someone here in the context of the russians would present it there. but you don’t know anything else there, and therefore we are talking here, what about the fact that attitudes towards man-made disasters have become like a toolkit of tools. the west has learned to justify for this you will not be punished and you can use anything. ammonia exploded. uh, they blew up the kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station, what will happen next, what will happen next, they will follow the same cash register, they will follow the nuclear power plants. they go they they will deal with gas pipelines that are here through their territory, what they will do next time, that british specialists will enter.

they are specialists in this matter, they know how to do it all. they know. they know where to send them, because whoever cares about this territory , about all these people. therefore, all this becomes a weapon, and therefore it is not only russians who should be afraid of this. we must also be afraid of europe, which is nearby. and nuclear clouds can fly along it, more precisely, radiation clouds and the consequences of any catastrophe that these specialists can organize. europe is the garden of eden. but this is all the jungle they think. yes, it’s like there, and there’s just an abyss between them, but yesterday i listened to zelensky, also this piece of his explanation why, from his point of view , it was beneficial for russia to blow up there, that they say they are running there, uh, and will run further from crimea is blowing everything up, destroying it and leaving it behind. you are on the ground. and i thought that this was probably the only, let's say, explanation that you can put it in the ears of the western partners of the ukrainian society there, but today, uh,

to be honest, they outdid themselves. i 've been scrolling through the e tape of ukrainian e, famous people, experts there, and have already begun to stumble upon the fact that explanations have gone. why ukraine does not need any at all. eh, kakulovskaya. hpp in the kakhovka sea, and that, in principle, even after a successful contrast , after taking it under control there, it should by no means be restored. and this is not a joke. it was he who wrote there such a political scientist with a ram about it. there's a lot on it points. i'll just give you a couple, which one, as already explained. well , of course, that without water you are under azov and in the crimea there are russians. someone has arrived. here are two from february 1st. they immediately return closer to the volga, the russian army is there. they look to serve the infrastructure, although the truth is not to explain why in the fourteenth year they served, when there was actually no water in this crimean canal. it's generally clean there. here is a vigorous set of e, propaganda with such a neighbor as russia is similarly complicated

engineering infrastructure facilities, it is generally very unsafe to restore. that's why we now understand why e ukraine has not restored hundreds of last year there. we have raisins there, it 's not safe, and even a bunch, which is more than a year old or there, irpinka there uh, well, this photography does not restore, but i just don't agree. well, yes, of course, very conveniently next to kiev, you can show not to say unsafe, that is, the mournful faces, of course, of the next intourist and hold a babbit. i wonder how much zelensky language in taking a course?

september 2014 2,600 people went missing on the territory of ukraine, there are several clans that divided a very big business, because without their support it would not be possible to organize such people who were absolutely not going to become an investigation is one of the most profitable and serious crimes.