first, i want to take advantage of my official position. and publicly congratulate my friend. the great artist karen geruchi

shahnazar with a very high assessment of state activity state award for us, this is a personal gift. it's just for us, so it's an honor for us that we have to, that we are friends and we are very happy here is the case when it's right who needs it on time and very accurately. but it is interesting, of course, what is happening in the world. we talked about this a lot, and, but if you look like that, we started talking about these trends long before of how they from latent became obvious. and somehow i feel. this is the same feeling of pride for the participants of the program for my interlocutors, because although these are sad forecasts about thunderstorms, but life has shown how right we were. and if you look at this

line, yes, which we have drawn over the long years of the program's existence. you can say that we almost never made a mistake, that is , there may be nuances somewhere, but in principle we turned out to be right, the west introduced a long war. and will continue to lead her on what will be clash in this program was discussed five years ago. it doesn't want to be believed. but we cannot deny ourselves the pleasure, because we live in a free country that pretended to be free. the opinion exists only within the framework of an approved concept, in this corridor of opportunities otherwise. and when we see that after all, despite all the conflicts inside, for under the only thing that unites them. this is the need to fight with russia nato

said in ukraine called that the conflict in ukraine is a marathon. well, it's not the case at all. in ukraine and not in russia but the fact is that this is a confrontation between two types of civilization. which is formalized through one anti-fighting side has formalized it through the military alliance of nato and is using it. well, in this case, ukraine has previously used other levers of ukraine is important here. it's just an application point. where does this deepest manifest itself? centuries-old confrontation from here and the phrase supports for so long how much will it take? well, that's how they've been fighting for so long. how many bananas is the eternal conflict. we surely peace and freedom

become slaves to the usa. well, they changed the owner, but he always was and it doesn’t matter who and at what moment from caesars to charlie manet from charlie manet to karl from karl to napoleon from napoleon to hitler from hitler to the american political swamp, but the essence is not changes, they always had to attach someone. that is, they have always been part of something big, here, the surname of those to whom they were attached can be changed, this does not change the fundamental essence. it is clear why, because their mentality is based and everything on catholic reading, which implies that there is a certain pope who is asleep. and criticism, which, in principle

, is impossible, antipopes appear there, but this is not the point, that is, all the same, for them there must be some absolute under which they adapt. disputes we are generally different. no better, no worse, we are different. and this must be understood very clearly. and we treat challenges differently, and we refuse what it would seem for the western world, how can they go for it? it's very simple. he just realized that we were making a mistake. and we say we won't go any further. this is mistake. we don't want that. here we tried to try on the western kanzulchik. and it's a bit cramped. we tried to get in. and

your old jeans have become too small for us. how was the prophetic spectrum quite a long time ago? we refuse, we suddenly realized that we are a bear. and the leadership of russia with the president in russia passed in a businesslike manner and were very productive. this is evidenced by a solid package of interstate intergovernmental and interdepartmental documents aimed at further the strengthening of relations between our countries in a variety of areas, and representatives of the press have now seen the exchange of some of these documents

. among them, i will note the declaration on the in-depth strategic partnership of our states , the most important bilateral document, which sets clear guidelines for interaction in the long term. and i have a question. and this is the flag there. one is russian, and whose second were you? in izhevsk, this is not the same state that france considered soft under the belly, where they were sure that it was absolutely and them that they are there, just that that's all that this part is, of course, this is part of france . that is, this is such a blow to the macron of the french , this one, right on russia, russia should be defeated cuckoo. get

your ass signed in africa for all europeans , moreover, in those territories where it would seem that they feel like part of their history. wake up very much. i like the way the st. petersburg international economic forum is going now. i like that and the shadows of despondency. no , on the contrary, those people who were there until recently tried to blame all the sins, they rearranged and they are bright. they are interesting , they light. i'm just enjoying it. here, watch the video where the minister of finance anton filonov, but very accurate and correct, speaks with a sense of humor. we've built muscle. this means that we ensured the right technological sovereignty and created independent systems here. er, that means that allowed us to develop further. this is what we have been working on now

, this is what i want to say that the year has passed well and we have worked out the so-called. situation no no really, because we agreed that we will control. eh, i have a question. do you have a mechanism? how to control? uh return of the pessimist or is it on our word or so somehow survived feel understand will come back a lot. remember yours now.

yes, we were just a little similar, but at the same time different versions of antonkevich. the whole room is worried. and you said that i 'm worried outside the hall, that you, in principle, are going on with the population in our country , but from the point of view of the population of the country. uh, those who left arrived. they are actually coming back now. we have banking statistics there that show that almost half of the people are already those who have already fallen. weird, they're back, actually. well, apparently, antonovich, he has some kind of incentives that they give out when entering, it doesn’t take the curves important. uh, broad optimism, in principle the population. yes, if you look at sociology, then we have the level of the index of social optimism, which is considered the whole of luke, is at a record long-term maximum. it is important that this trend does not turn back, but continued in a positive trend. we

criticized these people a lot on our show, but what's important, right? but they didn't flinch. you look a year ago. yes, what was the main emphasis on? we were sure that our economic gurus, the economic authorities, are the weakest link. we were sure they couldn't do anything. and they themselves were obviously not optimistic. you remember what the forecasts were. inflation will be crazy that the fall in gdp will be terrible? they were actually surprised at all they worked for. and now they have a completely different mood, because gdp well, much more than the european

countries, where germany slipped into recession, they didn’t allow frenzied inflation, we don’t understand well enough that there is still the central bank to correct, then in general the situation will be different. here dmitry gennadievich said that industrial enterprises. we have an enterprise on the day, but now, that is, they are opening. i didn’t come up with this, i read it, yes, what are you looking at, yes , the pace of opening of new industrial facilities is clear, which is important. uh, the poverty rate has gone down, the number of the poor has gone down, which very important level of unemployment at a minimum. that is, all enterprises that previously seemed to no one need to earn a shortage of labor. look at how western capital ran. it seemed that the markets would now be empty. nothing like that. our

industry is worth it industrialists, have become a very beautiful pattern. there is great merit here. and we need our own technologies, but at the same time we know how to troll, although on the other hand. so how do you build them? here's how you can seriously at least talk about something with the americans when the president is there i have a corrupt, out of my mind old man, of course, i'm sorry, but here 's what he said about the railway, then he can explain, you know, soon there will be 1 billion in africa. the one belt one road initiative, which turned out to be the destruction debts initiative. no, i'm not kidding seriously, but we

will win, and we will help, we are planning to build a railway from the pacific. across the indian ocean. we have plans to build one of the largest solar power plants in the world. i can go on, but i won't. i moved away script. i will get in trouble. maybe everything? no no no, that's not it. this is complete nonsense. we need fresh ideas better stronger stronger and more efficient. yes it costs 10 london ideas for the eleventh package. or super personal sanctions

well done, cool trolls. now i don't know if this is trolling or not? zhirinovsky is back. what should we do with ukraine , zhirinovsky thought, they broke the neural network with such a question.

we need to stop feeding this country, close the borders and forget about it. russia should pay with its citizens, and not spend resources for unpredictable ukraine let them sort out their own problems. well, let's just say the neural network failed here. it's a completely different situation to become a governor-general. kiev was better than in russia, firstly, returning to itself on the lies of africa, by the way, because i actually heard a lot of criticism about our grain deal there. well, actually, it seems to me that after all, in the light of everything and all these events. and

basically the main meaning is to understand, she, in principle, he is correct after all, if you remember at the beginning of e with it was the most burning the question is that russia is due to the fact that russia, uh, means here on deck ukraine, african countries will decide on grain and decide on support, which is essential for african countries and i think that if we had not agreed to this grain deal then, we would have lost the sympathy of many african countries, which, of course, are important to us, because in the final analysis it would be rather difficult for them to explain the situation to their populations. yes, no matter how we say it, but it’s not ours for this, but there are people if they don’t have food, they have completely different, as they say, priorities in this sense, i believe that even considering that yes. it has some aspects

that are unfavorable to us. ah well, that's what he said, because even what they do not perform. now we can talk about it. well, they are deceiving, but now we are not to blame. now it's not russia 's fault, and i think this is a very important point to consider. eh, then, as we see, that it is these countries, including, by the way, algeria , uh, everything is more inclined towards russia, so it seems to me that we are somewhat hastily here ours, especially such furious patriots. they are like this subtle big game and in it. of course, you need to understand somewhere there is a maneuver there is waste there is something that has to be sacrificed and the second point, of course, to a certain extent. this is a nod to turkey, and no matter how we say that we don’t care about turkey, we ourselves with a mustache. well, listen to turkey, in fact, for all that it pursues its own interests, but still it does not declare sanctions. we

understand that a lot of things are going through turkey and ends up in the russian federation, we understand that it is the most in my opinion. the main thing is not opening the straits. in general , i could open a conversation about the fact that well, they themselves are interested. listen if they opened the straits, for they paid well for it. i think, well, in this sense, you can imagine what would happen if the straits were opened, and they would enter the black sea. do you understand the military courts of england and the united states? this is, so i think that uh , after all, it was the right decision and there i don’t know how it will be further uh, so to say develop, but, in principle, our patriotic public should not, too, we need to somehow take a deeper look at this situation and in this sense understand that we really, and very often in a very

serious game of principle, in which yes , somewhere we have to go to compromises. somewhere we need to maneuver and somewhere we need to use some more flexible methods than just let's crush them now and that's it, so to speak. this is the first. the second thing i wanted to say. listen, here's an interesting thing we pay attention to. don't you think that russia is everything in general, let's just say. well, in general, the liberal bourgeoisie is a device by and large . agree. are you like a marxist? well , of course, in principle, yes, it continues what the bolsheviks did. what the bolsheviks announced 100 years ago, what soviet russia announced a hundred years ago, today the russian federation continues this. and what, and what is here, well, the soviet soviets at the beginning of their

history announced that they would change the world in a song so sung by the whole world. we are to the ground. we will build our new world. well, well, so to speak, and it is necessary to say the soviets will do a lot for this international, by the way, it was with the international that they met the great patriotic war. well, then there was the anthem of the soviet union well, in principle, as if the paphos of the soviet state was in changing the world order, this was paphos, this was the main thing. and by the way, this paphos of change, this primarily applied again to the countries of the west as a result of the soviet union of course, to a large extent thanks to the soviet union, the colonial system was completely destroyed. why are we today we have our well-wishers in precisely those countries from which we have been in the last 30

years. well, in general, they kicked back like that, yes, well , of course. as a result, we defeated nazism. the soviet union, that is, defeated the united west in this sense. and so today we continue. what are we doing? we are changing the world here we are, as it were, we want to change this this this this situation that has developed in the world. we are canceling it. this is the world in this sense, it is a paradox, in general, as it were, the turns of our history, despite the fact that i repeat and look at the foreign policy of russia well, these are young people in principle. it is more and more in line with the soviet policy for all of us. real fat, all i remember algeria is 60 you are africa north korea china people's republic of china georgievich which turkey mentioned by you? and from turkey, the soviet

union also had very good equals, to put it mildly, entered turkey even after the war. we built factories. we built metallurgical plants in turkey, well, turkey is a separate story, in general, well, in principle, from turkey we are developing iran this is me from the new who install in fact, i agree with you, but, well, in principle, i say we are, in principle, fine in this as they say. in this highway, which was the soviet union for me. i say, i am most amazed that this happened. here's besides. i do not think that this was laid down, as it were, in some plans. well, this is what our muslim brothers say, everything is in the hands of the almighty, so to speak. well, we and the orthodox say everything in the hands of god. yes

, you understand, but in essence. but now i think that, in general, we need, we need to remove this contradiction, and we have talked about this many times spoke between modern russia soviet russia is not idealized anything, but once it is always removed, because we cannot deny what we have grown from and what we are following today we are following. in line with the policy that was laid down by the soviets in the 20s in the twenties. actually, right after the soviets came to power in russia, in the ussr , and this moment. it's very exciting. in my opinion , very exciting and, in my opinion, very interesting. and it really is. it's like, i think it's the final stage. here is 100 years, russia is changing the world. 100 years, if we look at 100 years like this, russia is changing

the world. i repeat. russia destroyed the colonial system. it was russia that destroyed, well, in the form of the soviet union, russia defeated nazism. that was it and today russia 5 is changing the world. in my opinion. this is the final stage. this is the final stage, because it is obvious that this world is already ripe for completely different relationships, that is, hegemony. west, it is impossible 500 years of his rule. it's coming to an end. this process is not easy, not easy, not fast, but it's obvious. even based on what look at this fight. west with us. it is losing its middle east all the time, to a certain extent it is moving away from the west . latin america is leaving. uh, africa is leaving. southeast, china is rising more and more this change they are taking place. uh,

just before our eyes. this, of course, does not repeat the process, painful, not as they say, not fast. although it may be that it will develop quite quickly, but in my opinion the latter. what i want to say, i would like one more moment like this. i have a feeling that in this fight to a certain extent. the west today is fighting not for ukraine, but for russia how is this not paradoxical? as it is not paradoxical, he is fighting in order to keep russia at home, this is, excuse such a trick. well, in this, it seems to me, only he wants to leave in the form in which he wants to see her, but she wants to leave about herself. this ukraine is a hoax. he needs russia, he wants to have it with him, because if russia leaves, and she leaves, she goes

there to the east. it will be a disaster , a final disaster. and in my opinion. here, oddly enough, i think, it wouldn’t be scholz, these are things that go beyond the framework, so to speak, of political consciousness, but it seems to me that the true meaning is to leave russia in one’s environment in one’s own west it goes that, in principle, russia today has raised an uprising in general for the last 30 years it has entered the western system in russia, but it entered on the conditions that were offered and this is what is happening, this uprising they want, well, leave them of course , they don’t want her to sit at the same table, but completely on other conditions, therefore, this is in this sense, here, it seems to me, all these events that are taking place, as i sometimes say about this once again, i repeat that we are contemporaries. it is very difficult for us to understand the true historical church. why is it

50 years? that's how it seems to me, that's how the unusual is built in general. the future is for that and that, of course, is being decided now on the battlefield. this, of course, is decided on the battlefield, but in my opinion. uh, the west is doomed in this sense. dmitry, the point of view is very close to me karen georgievich, and for two questions. the first one is that we are really waging a very difficult struggle. mm fight on several levels and hmm concentrate on only one and see only one level. well, for example, there they put the squeeze on a grain deal and so on , not realizing that there are still other levels higher and lower relations with e, developing countries relations with strange middle east relations with individual leaders who

also have their own economic personal interests, including it is forbidden. the good doctor aibolit is sitting under a tree. i am working head of the feldsher obstetric station in the village of glebovskoye. where did you go, i think to nowhere, probably not a normal woman. he is not able to help everyone, but he is obliged to help someone there. oh, i love it too. nerves of vices do not crawl out russians.

give me your hand. maybe you can't hold on to shakhnazarov. what will you shoot? look into the cauldron, don't fall. there, his warehouse with dynamite will explode. so kostya will not get together. so, four without water are ready to make an order, but with criminal glue, game and a bottle of armor and a bottle of belt. and i probably sour cabbage hmm