i don't even know what they're up to. so this is such a variety up to astrology, but it will come, as in order. here, well, firstly, uh, here is garant georgievich for the sake of never. well, at least i didn’t hear and didn’t collapse. yes, on this very deal, and now it was brilliantly completely described, because there were many who collapsed.

so i can say that exactly a year ago, as soon as it was concluded, i named both of these factors directly in the text as key ones and said that this would return to us as a great geopolitical choice. and for the whole year i have abandoned this position. there is another factor that i will not publicly name even now, a little later. here but this does not mean that this deal is an eternal one of the strategies. gone forever. the rest of the british is that there are only interests that change all the time. that's why, uh, it's quite likely that in the first place, she has already given everything that she could give positive. that's how it seems to me, and uh further so to speak, you can strike back in this part. well, in general, as far as strategy is concerned, you understand? i've been here repeatedly and for a long time in recent

years less. ah, well, there, since the fifteenth year was, uh, in a very serious mezhinstvo, proving publicly all the time that we have a strategy. it exists and it has begun to form. uh, at the moment when the americans hit yugoslavia. that's the strategy. we began to form then. by the way, when it's straight miles, in my opinion, he said, yes, well done, uh, about the marathon. i congratulate you, mister four-star general, on your discovery. oh, the difference austin said, yes, well, well, he's not a general, but he they have a defense minister. here, uh, i congratulate you on the opening, it turns out to say this is not a sprint marathon. stirlitz guessed right? it's just ridiculous. but what does it mean when he says, after almost a year and a half, first a special military operation. why is he saying this? yes, because

they really laid down on the strategy of blitzkrieg. every time it was postponed by the first without a pancake, the economic and sanctions failed by may last year , the second brilliance of the autumn counteroffensive failed. actually failed. and in the last forces announced, the third, damn it. scream this is a counteroffensive, but you can't run away from the question of strategic. and what are you trying to achieve the death of russia through ukraine? so now even, well, the weak-minded should understand that this is impossible and not realizable. and let there be raika as he said, the great russian soviet cinema was on impulse and now they must say that either they will go into another radical form of destruction of us, or they will have to look for

a way to take out their paws. i have used this metaphor before and will use it again. they are so they were proud that they had seized ukraine and that they could use it with us. well, to harm us, that they have lost any, so to speak, strategic thinking, because by the fall of last year i understood so at the level of a metaphor that for them it turned out to be, you know, like a trap in the jungle of asia for a monkey. well, when they put a nut inside the pumpkin, the monkey sticks this road enough to pull the nut out, because the big fist from ukraine turned out to be about the same, if we consider all this in a strategic context and i think that for some part of what is still in the mind of the mind of the establishment. yes, it comes to the american first of all comes. that's what, uh, well, the way out. it can be very

sad from this whole story only in one direction only. well, a less sad exit is not foreseen, so now the russian is not telling so, it will be a marathon for us, but it’s interesting how you are going to run, with what actually further with whom and with what you are going to run. that's because, well , ukraine will now say straight. and we are all that we could do at this level of the americans everything that we could do at this level, and then either go to war, or we wash our hands, this is not what is pronounced. and what everyone knows.

an infinite resource of military power, which would give them a radical advantage, they need a radical advantage over us situational tactical, as shown by two two attempts, does not give anything, only a radical advantage, but technically. they do not have weapons, well, conventional national weapons. here are the ones that you can give to this very resource, so this is such a song, turns out to be a marathon he learned now. well, by the way, i don’t know how the british ummahs are there, the anglo-saxon mind is american. but i think that, uh, russian, when the bombing of yugoslavia took place, i understood. what

to increase? dodging the hundred years war will not work. this is where i think that this is the same continuous war. now there were different stages within this war. here i will try to give you my point of view. that's because the british don't really play. both the first and the second world war were warriors for their world domination primarily to destroy the germans. the germans were to be destroyed as domestic european rivals for the world crown. and they lost this war , the first and second britain lost. and

churchill acknowledged this publicly. he spent the whole night on the train, and then he went out and gave a fundamental speech that made him difficult to deliver. and because we are all, now you are our grandchildren, then all this was surrender. no one ever discusses this modality of fullton speech, this projection at all, to be objective, then churchill probably one of the most unsuccessful prime ministers of britain who became famous only as an owner, who became famous only for his own pr, but it is he who is almost a symbol of the best example for many modern western politicians was a talented journalist. he was very good at it. writing memoirs written lcd chic anyone who reads churchill's

memoirs believes that all there are napoleons, there are spinoza and other thinkers. this is all nothing manure, history. here churchill is the head. he has to kill a lot of people. no, here still, the matter was not plotted. this is what you need to understand, well your chance for world domination and your war for world domination great britain lost and in the forty-sixth year it was quite obvious to everyone and the next world war began immediately for world domination between the united states and the soviet union immediately, it began and did not end, so i argue that this process of continuous war. 100 years is ours. this here, this

situation with perestroika, with everything else, there is a lot of things mixed up, in general. it is necessary with this to understand, it is necessary to write history. it is necessary to deal with the documents, but it is clear that the elite wanted. well, the people in many ways wanted a very strong illusion imposed very strongly that if we don’t have these contradictions of communism, capitalism, so we , it seems, would live nothing the end of the war, in general, you know, by the way, notice, hammer the crash empire in the fourteenth year soldiers left the front with the slogan end of the war. and well, the empire and the king collapsed and collapsed. and i said, 14. yes, the war of the fourteenth year , notice that what happened with us perestroika, the leading slogan was the slogan,

the end of the war, well, it was called cold. nobody understood all this. therefore , the last yes of the strategy, we as if having experienced this for ourselves, entered into a new strategic process. at the beginning of the 2000s , quite consciously. completely conscious. well, at least there, in a narrow circle of people who made decisions, i think so. and then everything else was built into it. yes, it took quite a long time, although by historical standards, not so much, so i say mr. austin mr. mili and all the rest we are in the strategic process. we definitely have it, and all these more than 20 years of the last one prove it absolutely on the facts. and that's where you are but i

'm not going to tell you. you, gentlemen, figure it out yourself, mikhail, a lot of interesting things were said, but karen georgievich , first of all, and clarifications, when we talk about advice, after all, let's clarify that this was a continuation and part of historical russia it was a denial. yes, it was a continuation of the tradition through its formal the negation is completely directive. i was once hoisted the russian flag down there. he shouldn't have said not stalin but the hated one, bolshoy kamen nikolay and uh, let's say mikhail, let's just say straight out, the russian empire did not declare colonialism down. this announced after all the soviet could not. she couldn't do it. well, uh, and not by chance and not by chance, critically were not. and if well , during the big game with england, central asia , there were elements, and it was not by chance

that the general staff for the most part followed hated from a class point of view, the big stone did not support introverts, because patriotism, the second is really ending capitalism and the west is ending, but from the point of view of modern times. everything is just beginning in the united states of america will not fall themselves they will have to lay down they will have to help him in this england yes. the corpse is rotting, but if well, and the solution of bags is english zelensky yes, of course, of course, but until the city is destroyed, while it exists as one. even if it is a minor financial the center of the world, based on a multi-level managerial culture, until then this cadaverous self poses a danger to us to bury them; the chinese will bury them, unfortunately,

they will not, dmitry ivanovich, you said a wonderful thing that we are eating away from the west its periphery does capitalism exist? capturing the periphery, exploiting it, if there is no periphery, he creates it inside himself, he is the discovery of weinstein and is against it. he needs to create a pre-capitalist periphery to destroy the semi-periphery and recreate inside himself all the time this hell recreates social hell. if he does not have it from the outside we take away from him the periphery in this respect there are outstanding achievements. today i will unfortunately praise. and ours, as it were, in the course of our friendly mission, so to speak. in africa, there is no better relationship with africa, but french nuclear power. suddenly experienced a magical shortage of uranus in their reactors. there they have some supplies from kazakhstan, but here they start to sag. that is, we started playing in earnest and really would have to stop

accept their radioactive waste. it would be very good, but probably we, we have everything ready for them to work, the second and third time. we're all set. for their waste - it's our way, it's true, and we have our own waste. we also have our own waste, and let them be alive and shine with happy silanes. well, these happy finance ministers, in my mind, the finance minister must be angry, grieving for every penny. well, here's a classic accountant. why, where do you share seventeen rubles 25 kopecks. that's why you’re late, you won’t please you, but nevertheless, siluanov did a great job, because it was i who thought that now it can already be said that it was thanks to siluanov to another person who, therefore , influenced him, an eighty percent sale of mandatory foreign exchange earnings was introduced, which us and saved in the beginning of march last year, so to speak. he did this, and

he did it on sunday in violation of all his powers in violation of all bureaucratic norms and, uh, this is really an achievement for which the eternal serves gratitude and eternal praise at the same time words about securing technological sovereignty. i would still wait, what is called confirmation of these words. well, at least from the side of mr. manturov, who is engaged in this from a profile point of view, now about the stage at which we are now about the achievements of the mishustin government , it is undeniable, if he did not speak about financial technologies and financial technologies, financial technologies in general. we are one of the leaders of the world, so what i'm talking about is that the particles digitalization, we are leaders in management and what is called the use of financial technologies, but i don’t know how the ministry of finance is doing. i know how to listen to the tax authorities and even correct mistakes. not always, of course. so we

have solved the problem by stabilizing. now piecewise discontinuous development has been ensured ; the task is comprehensive development, so that it proceeds spontaneously under every bush. and only it was necessary to direct and here we are faced with, since the management of this prioritization is a question for us. us need to be determined. this is the question he looks most obvious, then the most terrible question - these are those that seem obvious. and what is the main property right or the life of citizens of the russian federation, of course, the life of citizens of the russian federation, and then the question arises. and what about the business that is openly, honestly, some openly honestly not, some are openly dishonest, but the money that is not earned here in russia is sent to support the fascist regime in ukraine in fact. this has been brought up several times. name this business, because on the side. it works

very simply. our current legislation clearly puts these people in jail. and we have a lot to do. it's not the people that make the difference, first of all, how they are transported there. it's instant. that is, just you as a deputy? write a request. i think that the battery's with such a speed, for example, the firm mars which firm? but this is not our company. no, this is not our company. no, our global corporation does not announce this publicly, that they have not left russia now , again, it is the company that sends. she sends money from russia. a global firm that operates in russia in russia in production and the firm is officially many. they pay here, of course, the company is offered, which means that it is doing what it is doing well now. for example , i understand correctly that she should also renounce all e-

software that represents western services. no, how should we abandon all cell phones, because the koreans, including samsung, as i understand it, somehow support ukraine. that is, simply by this logic. i give you head office something lists, which is not located here is not a russian company, then we must abandon any business of a foreigner. they are all worth it. that is, we should we are not. here is very simple. we need you. those firms, and this amount of which today we cannot refuse bars. no no, that's a scam then. no, it's not an onion. that is, he said a firm from which we cannot refuse. we must adopt a program to free ourselves from technological addiction. from no it is, of course, pure lucas in the first place, if we say that all global corporations support ukraine in one form or another, everything is objectively the same, therefore

logic. we must now take and abandon all global companies represented in russia. you did not listen to what i decided that you said, but further, you said that you did not listen to me again. no. forgive me, please , in russian, that we need to single out firms, without which we cannot work with the rest to sort out such firms. we are fine. bars will live well, without anything no it is not true. you just now gave an example of what we cannot live without, and we must accept the addiction program. come on, chocolate money, they can’t kill us, but i don’t know there, cell money can, this is called bringing to the point of absurdity. well, you started to build what you said, we have to pour. what is more important business or what is important for us is the right of property or the life of our

citizens. well, let's take away the property of mars let's take a look at the property to be gradually eliminated on its territory. the business that is our enemy. if we can't do it today. here, too, so we have to replace it until tomorrow , business, enemy chinese business, also enemy, but chinese business. i want to remind you that the sanctions that were imposed against us are one thing, and murder is good murder. sorry not one candy bar. haven’t killed anyone yet, if only one, on which we borrowed money that pays, but look, chinese drones are killing us, but the ukrainian side is using chinese drones. use, of course, based on this. lags now we have to abandon those chinese drones that we use here turkish business, because for the third time i say that we must identify companies that we cannot do without. well then, adopt a program to minimize them

and implement this program. well then, the logic is interesting, that is, it turns out. here are those who were killed by chocolate bars, and life is less important than the life of those who are killed, there is other money. well, you said, of course, that you originally raised the question. you said what is more important right property or people's lives, like speak is, until we we do not accept this program of release from technological addiction. we accepted it, then everything has already been done. no, they didn’t say there, they just accepted, we are doing very much now. it's just that we have become all western companies. you have to live in accordance with our legislation, and they live perfectly with ours, who leave, they have to sell, which means they still pay 10-15 for half the price. the love tax center was taken away from them technological chains, we do everything here competently, that is, much more. ok then. let's give up candy bars, get the younger generation that hates us, but great option. i'm sorry, but they are not

able to produce chocolate bars themselves. and you are able to produce well, show me how i can’t produce chic, but people buy something wonderful, that they can go to the store and see that baikal is beautiful, but still people ask what you, i lived at the time, when he walked. go to the store, there is saury in oil. yes it was sarah in oil. and now even the old ones are gone thanks to this kind of reasoning now. go to the store. everything is there. uh-huh. but if you offer to choose, it will be like with your speech about the fact that i will not take rifles, they will go to kill people. it's just that we're doing some things. let's be objective. either the law applies to everyone, or then it is not clear. what a law. and you are proposing again you are proposing technological liberation. suggest that this will end old in moscow you suggest, crazy corruption scheme. there is no under which and who will determine without

which technologies we can live to provide. now it's very good. we decided to pay, who will compile this list, because huawei who created any specialist, any specialist in our country, there is no such thing. if there are specialists of the last year, who signed march last year, there was a threat that they would leave the american company cis, and after that there were swings. and if these swings swung a little in the other direction, we would have 2-3 months serious problems. okay, but now they support the ukrainian nazis, to be honest, they didn’t do it, they probably support it, but this is a problem. it has already been decided how to hold on to the russian federation who knew the appropriate technological solution was kicked out no, they were not kicked out, but now the ukrainian nazis are allowing it. but this is a good question, this is the question that i also want

to ask. including the government of the russian federation of the russian federation, they argue very simply, does it think systematically? we have created certain technological independence, then not enough of that. and we can physically prove that the money that mars pays is technological independence, when you can't do anything. i tell you almost that the country can not do anything, and now just a minute, which are flying. they that, it is not technological seriously. and what is there, like now to rig. i'm just saying what we can't do. nothing. you may not be able to confiscate the intellectual property of the enemy. we will be turned off by idiots, because we are technologically independent. you will immediately bring down your duma to do nothing. you can't take these classic contradictions. no, i just listen and know well what i'm saying, because i bring your point. yes, its implementation. i see another corruption, yes. this is what the deputies live on,

who paid the competitors in march? how much the competitors of mars paid you in the singular is being investigated. i say again, who paid you? what kind of competitors red october once dreamed , so who was marked out, so it’s still time, now we won’t give the germans more of our program to drag competitive and other interests. i have a company name. because i understand what it leads to. if i didn't name it, you would say that you must exist. and even now in this nightmare you can't prove anything. like what. you can prove that this money that is earned in russia is somehow derived from everything that was written. our profit

goes there, is it profit coming from us or not? how by law under which laws we do not transfer money under the laws of the russian we are not transferring money back to the federation now, how can they withdraw thousands of them, for example, at least one difference in price. here, then close it. what is the difference between when our financial transaction is closed, everything goes away from science. what off? who is now leaving from the fact that you cannot transfer money? through which banks can you answer these transactions? here in the duma then, lord, you must legalize this price difference through a money transfer through a deal. you are the deal holding. can you have western banks won't they accept? yes, deal with them for these banks, and then the house will shout who paid you for this agreement, because they want the situation of this bank to finish at least one thing out of those millions of times that spent here at least one finish.

get it, investigative committee, finish off the prosecutor's office, or as a deputy bring the case to its real conclusion, or these companies should sue for the fact that you are slandering them for what i said that twice two is four is what everyone knows, what you told a lie about it to tell the truth. that's when you do it, prove it to the judges if they file a suit against you, and after that you go through a time when you don't let me say anything. i don't let you tell the truth and do n't let you tell the truth. which respectfully filed a lawsuit, then these companies, that slander sounded at them here. you have the stands of the state duma with these companies sorted out there.

all right, we'll be fine. yes, you can’t cope, you can’t cope from here you can’t see the shore, the norwegians have to hit the antenna we will cover with a bucket and we will send other coordinates. normally, the prison is not afraid without a word. who gave there's nowhere to hide. i didn’t understand what you want, or something, crossed and fasten everything on the curtains. to my mind here still wanted to be rescued from the outside. as for boris khlebnikov's film, i don't understand. are we really discussing the operation now? documentaries for free without

registration