we are with them. uh, who uh talks in terms of common sense and shows genuine concern for the health of the global economy and global energy markets. i mean, first of all, our partners are taking such joint decisions that minimize for the world economic, community and world energy markets those negative consequences, uh, that hmm are possible when making politically motivated decisions in the field of the economy. of course, these restrictions are sure to hmm have negative consequences for us. well, first, for different markets. these are different discounts. this is the first and in some cases the discounts are minimal. and secondly, as i said, all these discounts in one way or another affect the global price environment, and in

general. it is at such a level that we are quite satisfied with the growth of production, and this suits us quite well inside the country too. uh, sales volume is decent. uh, so yes, it affects revenues and the budget. this is certainly hmm, both gas prices and e and the volume of gas sales to well-known markets, first of all to european ones. well going gradually from them markets to other markets. there isn't any disaster. we don't see it here. this forces our companies to act more energetically to look for new logistics. uh, look for new partners, and they find it makes our companies act more, uh, more professional or not just bring the goods to the port and sell it, huh?

well, i don’t want to talk about all the tools, well, they acquire assets abroad of our company, they refine oil, uh, into oil products. in general, the oil and gas market russia is in good condition and has brilliant prospects for development. here is the president. and lies are also included in this group again, plus hmm, we will burn and fold together. uh, we consult in making these decisions within the framework. e of this organization. hmm, i must tell you that all decisions are within the scope of opek plus. uh, to reduce production, including, well, and above all, they are politicized to the point. they are not connected with russia's special military operation or with any other circuits. considerations. they are related to the issue.

economic expediency for both producers and consumers, and in general, we manage to balance the market through joint actions. thank you vladimir vladimirovich you are well. it is known that when in the collective west they talk about sanctions against russia, a new element has now appeared. and they don’t just say that russia should be punished. well, what do you need to limit russia’s capabilities, specifically your capabilities, as the supreme commander in chief, to mobilize economic er, the resources for confronting the collective western ukraine, in particular, indicate that it is necessary not so much to strengthen sanctions, but to prevent someone from somehow bypassing them? and these sanctions, uh, are being interpreted. uh , as they like to say in the west, not just at the level of laws, but also at the level of rules,

that is, we do not want russia to have money to continue the war. this means that this money must be refused, and it is no secret that there is a lot of pressure on many countries , including even china, india, and, well, on specific companies, what's going on in this direction. is russia already feeling, uh, the new sanctions pressure, and is the acton brussels-london able to prevent russia from receiving much-needed funds for the armed struggle? as i said in my introductory speech, deep transformations are taking place in the development of our country in the world, as i said in my opening speech, we began to reorient ourselves in the market of asian countries to africa to

latin america not yesterday long before the start. uh, here are the tragic events in ukraine for a long time. and why? and, because the trends of the world economy are changing, because the new leaders will change these growth rates of the growth rate. uh, let's say the trade turnover between china and the eurozone is even greater than the growth rate of our trade relations with china . when i hear you sing depending on china, you won't get in. you've been in for a long time. you know what's the matter, they hit for a long time already, i'm nothing like, like, uh, it's good for them to hit. uh, we have good ones. hmm, not just, yes , there are neighborly relations with china and india and with other countries. other countries

are also developing there, uh, at a tremendous rapid pace, indonesia for example, a huge market, you know, and developing rapidly. hmm latin america will also develop and is developing now and will not develop in africa there are huge opportunities. yes, there are many problems. well , you know that they are on the rise, everyone is on the rise, so all attempts to artificially limit lead to the fact that they begin to suffer from this to a greater extent. those who carry these restrictions. we cannot be happy with this, but it won't lead, it won't lead to the occurrence of such uh, such uh circumstances that hinder our development. well, i don’t know, but i cited our figures and trade turnover, the macroeconomics has been growing and

stable since the second quarter of last year , already from the second quarter. we have seen growth. our economy has grown 3:3 since the second quarter of last year. well, at the end of the year , of course, it will be adjusted there, everything will be , for example, one and a half or two. well, in general, of course, i would like to, since it’s aljili to have, there are four or more or like in india. well, they are now now leaders, in general, you understand , to force other countries to stupidly follow someone's interests in the modern world is difficult, and almost impossible for an hour. well, how can you force some country with a multi-million population to say, do not buy grain in russia, you are starving. let your people die of hunger. well, who can say that? if someone can some idiot says so, they will not listen to him. they won't

listen, that's the problem. and here are the people who do it. they must eventually understand that this is not only counterproductive for well, some kind of world economy is incomprehensible, which at first glance is unacceptable for millions of people, but unacceptable, so they talked about the need to fight for the fight for the environment. well, in europe coal generation has sharply increased. and they do. these are those people. yes, the so-called green ones, who only yesterday were shouting the most about the need for coal-fired generation to close completely nuclear generation, to completely close everything today and i, they turn on and turn on coal. moreover, the structure of the energy sector , let's say, of some european countries. it's coal already many times more than in russia everything is forgotten thrown into the trash all this chatter, and also because the previous decision was

not economically justified at all and it is only beneficial for them that the current state of the current crisis in ukraine is a reason to cover up their economic mistakes in energy and finance. they brought it. uh, brought the situation to a sharp rise in inflation. why? yes, because it’s mindless to pour money into your economy in trillions, there, in the states there, you can say nine trillion in lily, i don’t now i remember generally beating in europe trillions of euros inflation spurred not we did. they did this even before any situations in ukraine , now they cover up their mistakes by the fact that russia needs to be punished and russia is being made extreme. no, that won't work. i don't know, mr. president, how does the region relate to our cooperation. yes, i think you will agree. she is our joint work. well, everything is absolutely pre-politicized.

characteristics with my great friend vladimir putin we all understand in our economic activity that there is and attempts to politicize. uh, this or that economic decision, the economy should not be politicized, so today, if you will allow me, i will add a little bit to what you said, today we are seeing a new cold, undeclared economic war. because there is a difference between what happened at the beginning of the years. in the form of a hodavag

and what is happening now, because the needs of the dough have changed. uh, of course, there are few countries that produce this amount of grain. as your country, no one can force you to abandon your course in this policy, including in the field of agriculture, grain supplies. i hope that people who come up with such crazy initiatives will still be formed and will pursue a normal economic policy. thank you literally two words to really force countries, and it is impossible to follow stupidly hmm the requirements of some states that are unfriendly to us, which have been fighting russia on a systematic basis for decades.

everything was forgotten about the event in the late nineties in the caucasus. if possible, use something against the fight in the fight russia is used to its fullest, including the same river, food, was used today by the nazis in ukraine. they forgot that they are neo-nazis, no one remembers, does not say a word. they put a famous person in charge there. yes, which covers all this neo-nazi mosquito and forward. nobody hears. so we just watched this video, which asked to show where, uh, bandera walks under the nazi flag and people are killed. do you think something will play there is not, it will be an information blockade

because they use this mechanism in the fight against us. it is also used in the fight against us. and uh, energy tools and food and finance and so on, but i repeat once again the world is changing very quickly and the effective action of their tools. it nullifies and deals damage. first of all, those who are trying to introduce these tools to fight against russia as for the tools, vladimir vladimirovich , the tools are used not only against russia, but you are credited with using an interesting tool against the united states in many respects economic and political , even the united states may have been built on the role of dollars in the international financial system. and now they say that you are using the current conflict to the conflict

with the united states in order to start and speed up the process of donalization. firstly, is it so, and secondly, to the extent that it corresponds to reality. what are your results of this process of abandoning the dollar as hegemony and international dollar financial system? first of all, i want to say. i hope that mr. president will agree with me. that's because our friends are carefully analyzing what is happening in this area, including in the arab world and in africa, the russian economy. the influence of one or another currency directly

on the world economy is directly related to the economic potential of the country that is the issuer of this currency, the economy of the united states is one of the world's economies. true, it is now inferior in terms of purchasing power parity to china economy, the chinese economy has overtaken. it's about the size of an american one, but it's a great economy nonetheless. this is an obvious merit. uh, so the american people are talented and capable, no one denies this. it's just that today's political leadership is abusing the american people's trust in the american people. here i am talking about this with complete knowledge of the matter, including because it pursues political goals. this is another

question. is it correct goals from the point of view of the interesting they undermine their power, in including uh, uh, uh world financial, because using the dollar as an instrument of armed struggle, and you can’t say otherwise. they raise doubts about the reliability of the american currency as , uh, and as a settlement instrument of world trade and as a means of accumulating reserves, the reserves of world, uh, large economies in dollars are declining from year to year, not so fast. so, as someone would like, but they are declining just as the calculations in the world economy in dollars are declining, the calculations in national

currencies. the calculation of the calculation, let's say in yuan, in some in some revolutions. eh, it is no coincidence that the arab countries are generally out of touch with the events taking place in europe. and in latin america, ideas and projects for creating their own currencies are being born, it is not by chance that in the arab world they have long been talking about creating them. e their single national currency in asia is talking about it is growing. e, the share of calculations in e is growing. in yuan, but if in the leading arab countries oil producers are now saying that they are ready to pay in yuan for oil, but you know, we have absolutely nothing to do with this, but if this trend picks up, and uh, exchanges or other exchanges appear, uh, for oil and gas, and the calculation will be made not in dollars, but

this the beginning of the end for the dollar. but we are not here. this is what they do with their own hands. and this gives me every reason to believe that today's political elites are abusing the trust of the american people. and they themselves are doing business, those negative consequences, about which i said. it's uh thought about another issue. with such western leaders what kind of president is chancellor schroder, how is prime minister lusconi i have the impression that when you look at leaders today, at least in europe , probably the united states and you are dealing with people of a different caliber and one difference from

previous leaders, which, by the way, i will not blame for excessive love for russia , the only difference is that those leaders had a sense of healthy pragmatism, realism in the understanding that actions will justify counteractions, that if you take some steps against another great power, then this can have serious consequences for your loved one. here, i look at the current western leaders. i have a feeling that they have, uh, well, if you like, some kind of detachment from reality specifically. a-a complains that they do not have sufficient contacts with you more widely with the russian leadership. the question is whether

you consider nato a participant in the war in ukraine and if nato is a participant in the winona war in ukraine, in general, it is difficult to imagine that there is a place for constructive diplomacy, or am i mistaken? one must, of course, be drawn into the war in ukraine, that's what we're talking about, uh, deliveries are military equipment, heavy equipment. now the option of delivery to aircraft is being considered. as a matter of fact, today i have already spoken about the fact that five tanks are trying in one sector, but in another sector, also one and a half companies, approximately with the support of two tanks, the tanks are on fire.

but if they are, but if they are located at air bases outside ukraine and they will be used in hostilities. we will have to look at how we can hit and where we can hit those means which are used in combat operations against us are serious serious dangers. e further involvement in nato in this armed conflict. but as for the western leaders. you know, i never give any ratings. eh, well, to my colleagues, no matter how we develop personal relationships. i consider this incorrect. by the way, i'm the gentleman from zelensky, i never say anything, but the only thing that caused a complete

rejection. how can you support not to look for us. and and erect them uh within national heroes, regardless of the ethnicity of this or that person. that's the problem. here, this is the most important thing, but i repeat i never give any assessments to anyone. well, you know what i just thought, i apologize to the audience. just recently, the former prime minister passed away. eh, italy , mr. berlusconi, he did a lot to build normal long-term relations between russia and the nato countries, and what would they mention, he was a very bright person, and i was very energetic, energetic, without any exaggeration. i consider him such a personality of world scale. if me uh don't well, if i

apologize to the audience, i would ask to honor him to change minutes and silence. thanks for the shirak. he was a man of encyclopedic knowledge. in the full sense of the word. some of today's leaders do not even have higher education, but such is the specificity of the political system. uh, in some countries, what u throws up. e people, with such a, let's say, weak, weak training in general education and cultural level. here i am when well now is also wide.

no, he was such a big political figure. i once asked him. why the american leadership is acting, in some cases, in russian in russian answered, because not cultural. direct speech a is connected. this is just with the level of general education and understanding of the development of objective processes or misunderstanding of these radioactive processes, but in spite of everything and no matter what happened there. we treat all our partners with respect. i hope today's uh today's uh

the challenges we face, including in the field of security, will lead us to the understanding that security should be equal for everyone, which we always talk about in our partners. and despite the role of nato of the collective west , you did not close the door of diplomacy by western leaders seeking peaceful regulation. so we never closed it, we didn’t decide to cover it up in the bangs , they look at us with your help, among other things. certainly. you know, there was a very good topic, this is world currencies. i don't know mr. president, at what stage of consideration? is there anything in the arab world right now that indicates that our

colleagues continue to think about creating a single arab currency, something is happening here. i just missed a little. to make it so, i think that today we have some currencies now, as if they have imposed themselves on the whole world, but so i say, fat. we would like that in the near future we join the brix organization in order to free our economy.

how do you rate the level of your dialogue the united states with a biden administration? what he is well aware of is the former, how he believes in the future, us president donald trump says that if he were president, you would never have come to an armed conflict in ukraine and that he was able to resolve it very quickly. what do you think in this situation, is there a constructive dialogue between the united states, and

is it possible, in principle, at this stage? well, as for lord trump, during his presidency a very large number of sanctions and restrictions were introduced against i draw your attention to russia that there were no serious tragic events in ukraine and there were no names in the surname, but nevertheless sanctions were imposed. uh, but uh, i do not rule out that if there was, another administration, we would still be able to follow the peace settlement plan, uh, from which both ukraine and western capitals. unfortunately, they just refused. why did they say this publicly , and as for contacts, uh, we have practically no contacts. well, we didn't give them up. if there is a desire with

us to conduct some kind of dialogue, please, we are not with them we do not conduct a dialogue. they just translated this dialogue. uh, to the arms supply sphere, but for now, he's going to burn everything we supplied. well, let's see what what will do next. well, i said, you called the amount about 30%, uh, about now, exactly 30%, uh, heavy armored vehicles were even destroyed and delivered. well, this, uh, i don’t mean not bradley, there are only e-leopards, but, but simply by the number of quality 200 18 tanks and of them or dough and there are 400 e, 18, in my opinion, armored vehicles of them and hardly including this, well, in terms of quantity. well, there is no doubt that this process will

continue. well, well, it would be better yes, they went a different way looking for peaceful means, but so far it has not come to that. we see them trying to win on the battlefield. well , hands, let's see how they do it, not yet. well, here's what happens? and washington , let’s say benevolence condescendingly refers to this , that in russia it is applied on the russian territory of the indigenous territory, no one we also dispute how the russian territory is getting more and more strikes, including on the kremlin , including terrorist attacks organized by kiev and in moscow where daria dugina died