this is also happening in the arab world and in africa, and i want to say this: we have never had and do not have the goal of de-dalorization of the russian economy, and we have never had and do not have the goal of de-dalorization or influence on the darization of the world economy. the influence of this or that currency directly in the world economy is directly related to the economic potential of the country, which are the emitter of this evolution . the united states economy is one of the world economies. true, it is now inferior in terms of purchasing power parity chinese economy has overtaken the chinese economy. as big as american, but still, it's a great economy. this is an obvious merit, which means that

no one denies the talented and capable people of the american people. just today's political leadership of the american people. this is another question. is this goal correct from the point of view of the interests of the united states themselves, they undermine their power, including, uh, in the sphere of world finance, because using the dollar as an instrument of armed struggle, and you can’t say otherwise. they give birth doubts about the reliability of the american currency as, uh, and as a settlement instrument of world trade and as a means of accumulating

reserves, the reserves of world, uh, large economies in dollars are declining from year to year, not so fast. uh, it means, as someone would like, but they are declining in the same way as settlements in the world economy in dollars are declining, settlements in national currencies are growing. the calculation of the calculation, let's say in yuan, in some in some revolutions of the arab countries, it is no coincidence that it is not at all connected with events taking place in europe. it is no coincidence that ideas and projects for creating their own currencies are being born in the arab world, they have long been talking about creating them. e of its single national currency in asia is talking about it is growing. e,

the share of calculations in e is growing. in yuan, but if the leading arab oil producing countries are now saying that they are ready to pay in yuan for oil. well, you know, we have absolutely nothing to do with this , but if this trend picks up, and the exchange or other exchanges appear, uh, oil and gas and calculation will be produced not in dollars, but this is the beginning of the end for the dollar. but we are not here . this is what they do with their own hands. and this gives me every reason to believe that today's political elites are abusing the trust of the american people. and they themselves lead to do those negative consequences, about which i said. about another issue with such western leaders what kind of president chancellor schroeder as

prime minister lusconi i have the impression that when you look today at the leaders of at least the countries of europe, probably united states, then you are dealing with people of a different caliber and one difference from previous leaders, whom, by the way, i will not accuse of excessive love for russia, one difference is that those leaders had a sense of healthy pragmatism, realism in the understanding that actions will justify counteractions, that , if you take any steps against another great friendship , then this can have serious consequences for your loved one. here, i look at the current western leaders. i have a feeling that they have, uh, well, if you like, some kind of gap from reality specifically. uh complains that

they don't have enough contact with you more broadly with the russian leadership. the question is, do you consider nato a participant in the war in ukraine, and if nato is a participant in the war in ukraine , then, in general, it is difficult to imagine that there is a place for constructive diplomacy, or am i mistaken? it is necessary, of course, to be drawn into the war in ukraine, that's what we are talking about, uh, military equipment is being delivered, heavy equipment. now the option of delivery to aircraft is being considered. as a matter of fact, here we are today i have already said that there, in one sector

, attempts are being made from atak e, with the forces of two hands, with the support of five tanks, but in another sector, also one and a half companies, with approximately two tanks. tanks are on fire , several tanks are destroyed as well. at 16:00 well, if they are, but if they are located at air bases outside ukraine and used in hostilities. we will have to look at how we can hit and where we can hit the means that are used in combat operations against us - these are serious serious dangers. e further involvement in nato in this

armed conflict. but as for the western leaders. you know i never give. and no ratings. eh, well, to my colleagues, no matter how we develop, personal relationships, i think this is incorrect. by the way, i'm the gentleman from zelensky, i never say anything, but the only thing that caused a complete rejection. how can we not support three. and to erect them e within the framework of national heroes, regardless of the ethnicity of this or that person. that's the problem. here, this is the most important, but i repeat. i never give any ratings to anyone. well, you know what i just thought, i apologize to the audience. just recently, the former prime minister passed away. eh, italy, mr.

berlusconi, he did a lot to build normal long-term relations between russia and the nato countries, and what would you mention. it was a very bright person and a very active energetic self, without any exaggeration. i consider him to be such a personality yes on a global scale. if me uh don't well if i apologize to the audience, i would ask to honor him to change minutes and silences. ugh thanks. what about shirak? he was

a man of encyclopedic knowledge in the full sense of the word. some of today's leaders do not even have higher education, but such is the specificity of the political system. uh, in some countries, what u throws up. e people, here with such, let's say, poor preparation, er, general educational and cultural level. here i am when chirac is also gone now, jacques, he was such a big political figure. like you asked him why the american leadership behaves so-so, well, so aggressive and so short-sighted in some cases. he answered me in russian in russian, because they are not cultured. direct speech a is connected. this

is precisely with the level of general education and understanding of the development of objective processes or misunderstanding of these administrative processes, but in spite of everything and no matter how it was. we treat all our partners with respect. i hope that today's e today's e challenges that we face, including in the field of security will lead us to the understanding that security should be equal for all, which we have always talked about in our partners and that is, vladimir vladimirovich , despite the role of nato in the collective west of the war in ukraine, you do not close the door to diplomacy by western leaders a and you are an open

search for a peaceful settlement. so we never closed it, we didn’t decide to cover it up in the crack, they look at us with your help, among other things. certainly. but you know, you had a very good topic. it's u world currencies. i don't know mr. president, at what stage of consideration? is there anything in the arab world right now that indicates that our colleagues continue to think about creating a single arab currency, something is happening here. i just missed a little. i would like it to be so think that today we have some currencies now around the world we would like to see in

the near future we join the organization. arabia to me naharab emirates we, uh, maybe decisions will be made, about which you are now talking about as possible we'll see.

thank you how do you assess the level of your dialogue with the united states with the biden administration, as he knows the former, how he believes in the future us president donald trump says that if he were president, you would never have come to an armed conflict in ukraine and that he was able to resolve it very quickly, as he seems in this situation. is there a constructive dialogue between the united states, and is it possible in principle at this stage, lord trump, then during his presidency a very large number of sanctions and restrictions were introduced in russia’s relations , i draw your attention to the fact that there were no difficult tragic events in ukraine, nevertheless sanctions were introduced, but it is not excluded that if there were another hell. we would still be able to go along with the peaceful

settlement plan, uh, from which both in ukraine and , uh, in western capitals. unfortunately, they simply refused, and publicly said about it . as for contacts, uh, we have practically no contacts, but we didn't give up on them. if there is a desire to conduct some business with us, please do not we do not have a dialogue with them. they simply transferred this dialogue to the supply sphere of his weapons. well, now let's burn everything , put something. well, let's see what what will do next. well, i said quantity. this is about 30-30%, uh, about now exactly 30%, uh, of heavy equipment has been destroyed. i'll put it on already. well, this

is not uh, i don’t mean bradley, there are only e-leopards, but the post according to the number so far is 218 tanks and of them either apart or there 400 e, 18, in my opinion, armored vehicles from them and hardly including uh, this is well, for now, the number. er, well, there is no doubt that this process will continue. here. uh , well, it would be better yes, they went a different way and looked for peaceful means of resolving the sport, but so far it has not come to that. we see them trying to win on the battlefield. well. flack in hand, let's see how they do it, not yet. uh, and washington, uh

, this applies, let's say, benevolence condescendingly, this is what is applied to russia the russian territory of the indigenous territory, no one disputes, and as the russian territory, there are more and more strikes, including on the kremlin , including terrorist acts organized by kiev and in moscow where darius dugin died and in st. petersburg. and where did the young blogger die? well, uh, of course, drone strikes on the kremlin and so on. moreover, this turns out to be such an interesting situation, on the one hand, the administration of the war categorically states that it does not approve of such actions. that she does not contribute to such an action. what did she not encourage? the destruction of nord stream 1 and nord stream 2 does not even pretend that, uh, that

this is not how it works. and what implications could such actions have for american support? how do you view this position of the united states and how are you going to deal with it? see everything you said, this is an attempt to provoke us to respond with such serious and powerful actions. well, here it is, uh, an attempt. there to cause damage to the kremlin uh, residents of the president of the russian federation uh attacks on hmm on the belgorod region there neighboring regions of russia that's all an attempt, but an attempt to provoke us to retaliate 10. well, listen, if

we destroyed five complexes of patriots near kiev, then what does it cost us, there are no such restrictions to destroy any building and structure in the center of kiev. we don't do it for a number of reasons. and there are many of them, i will tell you later about these considerations, i will tell you, not yet publicly. but there is such an opportunity, everyone understands this. everyone is just waiting for us to start pushing buttons. well, no, such a need. this is the first consideration . there is no such need, because the opposite front line, has no success in this. it's all about realizing that success is unlikely. so we are being provoked to some tough actions in

response, oh, in hope, then point a finger at us and say. well, look how evil they are, how cruel they are, you can’t deal with them, uh, and all our partners with whom we are cooperating today have pointed this out , so there is no such need today . as for whether or not to? i repeat once again refused this dialogue. well, they don't want to talk. and we let's see at what point and what we can talk to them about in these adjacent territories, this is an attempt to divert us from uh from the main possible directions of this main attack that they have in mind about this, and an attempt to force us

to transfer some - then units trained in other areas of combat, contact, and so on. well, there's nothing unusual here for us. no. we 'll just react calmly. we will fight this. i have already said that if these m-m attacks continue, our adjacent territories will continue. we will consider the possibility of creating a cordon sanitaire on ukrainian territory. well, they should just understand why they are doing this, we are working on military targets. with high-precision, long-range, high-power weapons, and we are achieving success in these areas , it is enough to see how the warehouses with weapons are destroyed by the warehouses of the location of personnel, including foreign mercenaries.

uh, just look uh how uh hmm works in our our technique, so the direction. eh, there is always an answer. we just give it often we don’t even promote, but he is sensitive . this is the answer and the enemy knows about it. well , about the answer. it's not for me to tell you that more and more russian military experts, and not only experts, are starting to talk about the potential use of tactical nuclear weapons. this, of course, only in emergency, circumstances that do not exist yet, and we all hope they will not. i want to remind you that at one time in washington, when you visited him at the best of times, you met, uh, in the russian embassy with a number of american experts, and among them was sledger, a former secretary of defense and a brand of

blood rocks, a former assistant to the president for national security. these were the people who in the seventies were most responsible for developing the american concept of a limited nuclear strike. this is in the case of advancing e soviet tanks. uh, in europe they spoke the clamshell, they were quite normal, very competent people. and they said that in general, uh, this is quite not only a legitimate military tactic, but also a necessary part of nuclear deterrence, because and if the only nuclear strike that is possible is a strategic weapon strike. you are very unconvincing, because who would go for this, but if there is absolutely no other possibility. but tactical nuclear weapons. they said

it was not only an effective weapon under certain conditions, but also part of a nuclear deterrent. how do you feel about it? the negative is the use of nuclear weapons, of course. uh theoretical maybe for russia, this is possible if there is a threat to our territorial integrity, independence and sovereignty , the existence of the russian state. nuclear weapons are created in order to ensure, uh, our security in the broadest sense of the word and the existence of the russian state, but , firstly, we don’t have such a need, and secondly, uh, the very factor of reasoning on this the topic is already lowered by the possibility of lowering the threshold for the use of weapons. and this is the first part of the second is that we have such weapons more than u strange. they know about it and

all the time they are trying to persuade us to start the negotiations to reduce the horseradish. you understand how it is with us. because this is it in this case, to put it in bastard language. e of these e economic terms. these are our competitive advantages. e, and. uh, as you know, we negotiated with our union state with president lukashenko that we would not move part of this tactical nuclear weapon to belarusian territory. this happened. the first nuclear charges were delivered to the territory of belarus, but only the first with us is the first part before the end of this summer. by the end of the year we will complete this work in its entirety. well, it's like an element

of containment, so that everyone who hmm thinks about, e that, in order to inflict a strategic defeat on us, do not forget about this circumstance.

vladimir vladimirovich, you know, better than i , being the supreme commander, that in order for deterrence to be effective , the enemy must at least allow the possibility of you doing what the circumstances require, this is the correct interpretation.

mr. president, why does he call me or force me to what, so that i say what, so that he scares the whole world? why do we need to scare the whole world? i have already said that, uh, the use of extreme means is possible, uh, in the event that a threat to russian statehood is created. and in this case, uh, of course we have all the forces and means at our disposal. e of the russian state will use doubt here. no, well, let me remind you that the only country in the world that used nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear state is this party the united states of america, which struck twice, and the japanese cities of hiroshima. they felt they had the right to do so. this precedent has been created by the united states. sorry if she puts you under

work pressure. at me such here, as to more pleasant and important subjects. i want to ask you about, uh, russia's place among the top 10 economic dragees in the world, as far as i understand, now, in general, according to some estimates, authoritative estimates are in sixth place. do you think that we will manage to preserve and even strengthen it. if so there is no doubt that we will save the coming years. this is indeed the sixth place. uh, if we count the gdp at purchasing power parity in the environment, this is the usa and japan. so, germany and russia, here, in

principle. hmm , indonesia is approaching this cohort of the world's leading economies because the population is growing rapidly . the economy is growing rapidly. in general, very powerful processes are taking place in developing economies. mr. president. i was talking about the growth of the growth hmm uh population in algeria well, the economy is growing. our economy is growing interesting joint projects that will certainly develop. uh, right now , russia really ranks sixth in the world in terms of economic volume in terms of the purchasing power package. uh, i was talking about macroeconomic stability, but about how the uh, the economic situation is developing now and how we forecast it. eh, i have no doubt that this is the sixth place and they certainly provide it. well , let's see, yes, then we will move on, because if in the locomotive and

european economies in