to defend ukraine and return these goals , we set a strategic defeat for russia. initially, this was the goal. but this is completely different. as they say, motivation for us is a different goal-setting, because we are still, as it were, and this turns this conflict into a really different scale, and, accordingly, actions should be different. much more certain much more certain and don't expect e don't expect them to back off. they won't back down. they won't back down. and it has already become quite obvious, therefore, in this sense, after all you have to understand exactly. who is behind this? who is in charge of all this? well, listen. i don’t understand , i can’t imagine that this, of course, is mr. biden and jean-pierre. this is it so to speak. and even, damn it, a historical

historical personality. i'm still leaning. this is a war, the financial oligarchs are the most powerful. this is their this is their story. it's the ones who own the federal reserve that's, that's them they have brains. they have intelligence. they have great experience. they are in the shade. the only one they release. this is a watchful weed. that's like their man you know how one is legalized, damn it, and there it's all in the shade. well, it is quite obvious that this is precisely what is interesting, and we must really understand this for sure.

we'll take care of this. it will be the honest detective.

the next question, which means i wanted to say, well, yes, this is the story of the blinken travel china is an interesting story, of course, in the sense that still , in this sense, they are unique, impudent , you know, but, well, daring again, that is, of course that they need somehow today today, as if there is a feeling that they do not have it makes sense to bring everything to the end with china, and, as they say, some kind of some kind of attempt. to give china some guarantees that, and even some kind of proposal that let's steer together. well, it’s clear, for which i am absolutely sure, but in the wisdom of the chairmen of syria , it is clear that as soon as they deal with

russia, they will certainly deal with china, but i would still uh. the whole thing has cooled a little because they hear all the time that china is not helping us; it is not helping us enough; it is not helping enough, guys. well, actually there are some facts that are already driving down the street listen, over the past six months, in my opinion, every third car in moscow is 100% chinese. this was not the case six months ago. here i am now driving down the street there, well, not the third, the fourth, well , it didn’t happen, in general, solid chinese cars, moreover. we see all the automobile factories that have been abandoned. they reanimated in a very short time and launched products, but for me this is all clear, with the help of the chinese. listen, well this is actually a huge help huge, because you can imagine in what situation. we ended up with tens of hundreds of thousands

of workers who are working. well, for me , i have no doubt that it couldn't happen. just on private initiative behind this unambiguously. there were some decisions from above, to which chinese companies obeyed, and which they implemented now they are driving, damn it, i apologize for the expression, muscovites drive, the car looks great. yes, very well. i understand that it is entirely chinese, but it was necessary to do all this moskvich, it all needs to be adjusted, of course, not just like that released. it had to be fixed there. it was necessary to change the conveyor. we needed technology. engineers should be more serious. work for a year and a half look it happened, so i think we shouldn't be so a little capricious, as they say, china refers to china helps, apparently. here i am, so it helps a lot, only he helps in such a way that it can be said.

diplomatically it looks different. therefore , i think that in this sense we cannot have claims against the people's republic of china. something tells me that she helps in other areas as well. i don’t know how i’m doing this life with my chinese comrades, but in my opinion. we should not distrust china in this sense. i think that this is glinka's journey. it won't really change anything either, it won't change anything. we just when talking than i mentioned a historical character. you used to think yes mouse zatum netton panikovsky, perhaps, there is a different logic here. look at the new historical characters of american reality. i'm incredible hold on to this historical moment historical

figure. don't you guys know? dmitry, i have such a question off topic, but upon the return of these two, uh, tulovich, who discussed drinking champagne about the terrorist attack against zakhar prilepin, our bosses are also bubbling in various ways. they, too, will enter the boil upon their return. not for me, just curious. well, if kpi, then say that yes, i have kpi on my return. total in

the editorial series. i have this anonymous tv channel, uh, they boil this one, but, in my opinion, they should be boiling a government official, like any sovereign person one yes, we all have one this is a victory. and these will not forge victory , these will be defeats at all, of course, i can tell you that i categorically agree. and the problem of the deep rear. it is the problem of not understanding that this is already a real war. this is a war of annihilation, in general, these games are not up to war. here is the representation. we must finish, we must begin normal, hard , without pink snot, information work to tell the truth, war is a path under and blood war. these are losses. and then we got divorced.

you know, i almost never comment on the situation in the special military operation zone. that's the seventh time in a year and a half broke commented. you see, when i really agree absolutely from the sofa, he says that they gave something away 200 meters. come on. well, what is it, well, given away? get out, short phone collection point sign a contract hit 200 m and then yes and when it's from the couch through the lip of people who die? you put something out there. well, i think that's very unworthy. know about i went to brodsky, i had a heavy impression. yesterday i had a broadcast on the solovyov live tv channel, we discussed it there. i almost

never repeat what i say elsewhere, but i will repeat here. it's me otva shmat. this is a huge museum. this is more than a museum that makes a tremendous impression on a person of any nationality of the holocaust in israel, on any nationality of any culture of any faith, memory is a question, when does memory die, when does yours die now with the memory of the holocaust, and then memory when do you do the first six months? darkness , thinking that you are now cutting down a little political dividends. if you

have gone half a step into darkness, you will never return again, therefore, if israel does not understand that it is dying now, poison is yours. well, then, so be it, but in general, this is really what you were talking about and karen vladimir's daughter. this is a world of different realities, but the problem in these realities is that. what people? very often they don't want to know. don't the inhabitants of the former ukrainian ssr have the opportunity to learn that really happening? no, the ability to read telegrams. you don’t have to write , just read what’s going on; they don’t want to know how the europeans don’t want to know, how

the americans don’t want to know, how they don’t want to know that the tanks are with german crosses. they are already traveling through the territory of ukraine and burning on the territory of ukraine, as they do not want to know the inhabitants of israel that their country has embarked on the path of friendship with darkness friendship with those? who killed in babi yar and i don't have a single drop of jewish blood. well, they killed the miera in the woman. my fellow citizens my people and i will never forgive this betrayal of israel, then banderov will never forgive now that

he said very important things. the americans have come to such a situation in such a position that they are ready to sacrifice the middle east. they are ready to burn all their allies there. they simply haven’t decided on the price yet, they haven’t calculated how long it will take them to survive, they are ready to burn everything in europe well, look, a wonderful pair performance and their biden, which says what, when ukraine is in which nato where ? which nato where is ukraine who is it? ukraine and immediately stoltenberg, says a wonderful phrase. he says that hmm, nato countries should militarize, ensure such a degree

of militarization of ukraine so that it can resist russia for a long time , that is, roughly speaking about gdp, no one thinks about the social component, no one thinks about the promobilization resource. yes, he's out. it's already turning into mincemeat. so it's also a gambit. there is only one nuance. this is so far the ukrainian gambit of ukraine and they are sacrificing as a state as a people, but the european gambit is suitable, the united states is quite ripe to sacrifice europe to sacrifice europe by turning the big ukrainian war into a big european one, they themselves do not. and by the way, notice how they are driving the europeans there as well, and themselves lately in reality. if you take a close look at what they are doing they have not done a single

one. there is not a single step that would bring them closer to direct participation in this conflict. over the past month and a half, europeans have been driven there by the question of something else. where is that line? when after which the europeans will understand that they are already inside the conflict, or they will never understand, or they have already slipped this line. hmm. and i'm thinking, that's what i've been watching today absolutely illogical offensive. well , the kiev regime and the americans by and large did not need it. it was possible to do without it, they drove the american. kiev here in this counteroffensive in suicide now they tried to jump out, there was a moment they had ideas to stop no,

no attack on the american, yes, they don’t drive the ukrainian army on the offensive. and why and this is also a gambit all this here is a strategic reserve. he's not fully operational yet. we are not supposed to wear rose-colored glasses here. yes, he is partially not valent already, as it is customary to say to the military environment, but he did not use them. it is necessary to burn it, so that under the slogan that more advances must be made on the defensive. to change the actors and performers in kiev and thereby gain time, because with these actors the peace process or its imitation is impossible. but with the new you know, you can succeed, you can slip. well, i've slipped a couple of times already. why not try a third time, then try the very last. what i would like to end. i would take very seriously the information that has appeared from

various russian sources, including from the foreign intelligence service, and eh with nuclear materials. it is very serious. i 'll tell you more. this is most likely even more serious than when they tried to imitate a blow, allegedly with an iskander, which they sculpted from the point, but there is one nuance here. and i think that there is not enough intelligence not to do this, because if then it was still possible to say that the ukrainians themselves did it without consulting anyone. you are gone now, now everyone clearly understands that all decisions are made in kiev , especially such decisions are made exclusively through washington, that all decisions and all nuclear materials, including, apparently, not a very good degree of enrichment exceeding

what is allowed for the mother. there are such materials, they are under the control of american intelligence services. and so i think that here, strictly speaking, the last phase is underway. here is this ukrainian gambit. the only trouble is that with this last phase of the ukrainian gambit, the european gambit will begin, because there may already be more victims, a certain andrey. maybe, if we continue this topic, then, of course, i also never comment on the military situation. just insofar as i am not a military expert, but the discussion of the offensive itself about how the americans are involved here is understandable for the baydan administration. not now. even need success. i do not think that they would like to adjust it to themselves, he needs september-october. september october is when the election campaign is decided and here

for the american voter. first of all, of course, for the voter bandits for the democrats. it will be necessary to demonstrate certain successes, which they will consider a victory. i already said that now it is accelerating. here is this slowly stuffed topic about the fact that even if ukraine goes like this , we still won, because we didn’t let the russians into europe because we defended nato and also in general, such an idea that can be very fast. it is widespread in the western community and it can be effective enough to play in any case for the americans for the american voters for the europeans, but i would like to note that the americans are still a global player , they always remain a global player, therefore, when they play in europe, this is in the form this conflict of allies, they never spared. remember when they entered the first world war on april 4 , 1917, when everything, in general, was enough decided when they entered world war ii landed. more precisely, they landed on

the european continent in normandy on june 6 , 1944, in principle, they managed without them. they sat as allies, when the british were actually bent over in the fortieth year, when they opposed hitler. no, we will give. here are the destroyers, but for this you will give us back according to the list. what bases should have been given. uh, the british were a global power at that time in various regions of the world for these forty old american destroyers. therefore, what they will not spare an ally that they will unleash a war in the middle east, there is practically no doubt, therefore, when they are now playing with blinkin, well, blinkin, i would say that the diplomatic people had time. everything was decided until the last moment, accept him, comrade si and evrymit, but the main thing is 35 minutes , but, damn it, ken blinkin, nevertheless shook the hand of comrade sir, and before that he spent almost 7.5 hours with angan, 3 1 /2 hours

swami i think it was about one thing. it was about how to delay the coming conflict, not like those incidents that occur in the taiwan strait in practice. well, i would say with such an enviable already now they began to occur with an enviable frequency , as at least once a month somewhere the plane will not fly the same way, somewhere the courses of the destroyer will be cut by another chinese patrol ship and the like is not. they have a very big serious event brewing. january next year. elections. these elections may lead to china annexing taiwan , solving the taiwan problem without any serious complications of a military nature. there may be different types. maybe a military blockade, maybe a landing operation indeed. the situation may develop differently there. but if they elect pro-e there, they will come to power,

the commandants. more importantly, a very person who will come, she can go to embedding, so to speak, into the common chinese line for the americans. this is not possible as a global player. they can't miss. yes , i would like to decide, probably, consistently first deal with russia later deal with china they can't do it here. they will have to be at all points insofar as. here the whole system will collapse, if it collapses at one point, then the collapse will begin and go along the entire line. well, like the domino theory that they advocated in the fifties is the same here, so when we now declare a turn to the east, what is it for the americans? this is the new unit of the pacific equation. we have never been there. well, by and large, we are not there in general, not the main players. we kind of parted, and everything is the main player, the main thing

our field was the struggle - it was europe and they were taking it out. they us so actively. remember, this is the famous shanghai communion of the seventy-second year, when they started talking about three polarities, in general in the world, of course, and then it was far from three polarities, but nevertheless, nevertheless, they played. and now, then, for the united states, there is a player there. but the americans, exactly 30 years ago in the summer of, uh, ninety-three , the wbu university in japan, uh, clinton then the president of the united states announced a new the pacific community was building a new pacific community already at that time. uh, building the infrastructure of the pacific region, was estimated at 600 billion dollars, all a huge amount. these are economic interests, the united states is ready to provide security. remember.

yes, there is no security structure of its own there at all, and there is a dialogue structure, which is based on the osians, but no agreement and no security structure. there is no americans willing to provide this. and this is the main link game. yes, he achieved something in my opinion, no, everyone accepted him, but blinkin did not manage to establish contacts with the military, for example. he himself admitted this at a press conference. he said yes. so far, the question is about establishing direct contacts between the defense ministries of the two countries. well, it hasn't been reached yet. it is not discussed. he could not practically say anything about the trade war, it continues. maybe it's invisible to everyone else for us. but what about the trade war that unleashed trump. yes, it's actually going on. exit. they don't see it either. and china is now like this to me, well, comrades are able to show their own significance. here,

a certain barbarian from across the ocean came to him from somewhere to his leader under heaven. well, here's what you showed the picture. it was very, very obvious, nevertheless, the fact that the united states is now actively pursuing a diplomatic line, so to speak. in order to delay, at least the clashes, china noticed this for 27 years. it was telling c that we would solve problems, but she might, this will be decided much sooner. it may approach now, and it is better for the united states to stop this situation now. what actually, and does, damn it. kupirovat, well slow down freeze kupator did not find, of course, something of that, well, as if great talent to communicate with chinese comrades came out in a press conference. he spoke with his nose and left after the meeting. he spoke like this. i didn’t talk about it, that is,

it’s just called. well, maybe i'm now why let home? i mean, it's amazing certainly. these are very serious people. you'll have to move out on any lawlessness. it was our house that left for a long time; the nkvd was blown up by a mine.

we remain committed to our policies, one china by free discussion of the law on relations with taiwan and guarantee, we do not

support the independence of taiwan , we have clearly stated that we are against unilateral change by other parties of the status quol, we are clear and consistent in our policy. it is very important that we protect the status quo, which will help maintain peace and stability in for decades. i repeated this to our chinese colleagues also repeatedly in the framework of my interactions. with china at the same time and many others, we express the grave concern of 2016.