she explained that she was by right, the passing heir of the russian empire of the land. well, relatively speaking, therefore, what was signed, then our liberation campaign is correct. we returned to the land, torn away. this is not all we have, and not everything is simple for people to understand. we're talking about the thirty-ninth year, right. there, 17, that is, 22 years, that is, conditionally, they say the year 2000. for centuries there. here were the lands that your people have taken from you , the poles have taken it from you, they are torturing several tens of other accounts several hundred thousand people. that's all here, then they fought with you. that is, read on, this is the year 2000 very close to you. speak, listen, there is such a topic, if our brothers are burning around, now they are killing, they will have to go to save them. just when you realize how historical. it was all close, as far as it was all hot, then quite

a contract. she appeared accordingly. well, for me, you know? here in historical e, you can cross them for a very long time. yes, all these questions that touched, well, you have enough of one statement about e contract. eh, molotov-ribbentrop's statement is as follows. i believe that this treaty greatly increased our chances that we survived, that leningrad and moscow were not taken. and that they in the forty-first year did not end up beyond the volga . in general, yes, this is the role of this fact. this is a moving border. it is impossible to overestimate and

you know, volodya, this is enough for me, and because as a result, japan quarreled with germany for us, yes, this just does not play any role. okay moscow or leningrad - it would not play any role. here is what i stated at the seminar, please. do you understand who we are dealing with, in principle? in history, after all, this was not discussed in ours either,

not in school, not in institute unfortunately. well, after all, i studied and had the honor to study from the faculty of moscow state university, but what happened? at the yalta talks well tehran yalta and then what is the meaning of the significance of the situation that arose with those who were called allies? and this is a very important point. we don't have it at all. here, if we say that we did not appreciate and comrade stalin did not appreciate this or could not do anything already. i don't know, i have to deal with this too. well, the fact that the anglo-saxons entered into an agreement with us already knowing how and where they would violate them. this is the most important situation. and she, by the way, is the result of the outcome of the war, including. and it has a direct bearing on today's day direct to

the question. perhaps there are negotiations of an agreement and so on. in essence, they do not believe in the possibility of any agreements with the other world, in principle, i do not believe. this does not mean that the polytest cannot contain some and now, i would like that in our country, in our people, in our civilization, in our state, in our leadership , it would be they. by the way, the chinese indians formed this knowledge due to their difficult colonial past, because they were not yet colonized by zaman, bribery, treason , and violation of all agreements, so they know this, and we must know this. on my

experience of concluding alliances and all agreements from the forty-fifth year to the ninety-first with the same anglo-saxons. every time they enter into a contract, they already know how and when they will break it. and this is the whole price of this interaction. therefore, it is better to proceed from the fact that we will not have any agreements with them, and we will definitely understand that this is our enemy. as harry georgievich said , he is very accurately in the same existential situation as we are, and in two existential situations there can be no agreement, in principle, it cannot. do you understand? well, of course, i also started from june 22 to june 22. by and large , indeed, which falls into our long

the traditional story, as i do not know some kind of synthesis, at the same time sorrow and terrible misfortune. just a catastrophe at the same time the beginning of some completely different life. but imagine. yes, i understand how the stalinist leadership, in contrast, by the way, from the first leaders of the soviet state. still, she considered soviet russia, which they inherited, as a state, and not as a wick under the world. yes, but, nevertheless , internal resistance broke down for a very long time. after the failed first five-year plan, after very difficult problems associated with solving even just purely logistical problems there was very little little time to prepare. and, by the way, such a scope of repressions is understandable, and in the sense that it is true, but in the sense that it is clear that when the state machine cannot , cannot, but it is necessary. well, stalin at first , as it were, when the bolsheviks joined there were days when i got to the top management are different,

so there is information about it. how many pages of money he read and then, when it dawned on him that the first world war was not finished, what will she be? well, of course, they called the years there, they counted on the year 402, some other, and so on. but on june 20 , in fact, we were forced to become superpowers again. and maybe we would have become after how many years and would have tried to peacefully even stick. well, as if all the same, stalin was an imperial ruler, he saw why ivan the terrible was returned to the cinema screens by alexander nevsky that's why he argued with the directors about the oprichnina right or not? it was necessary to take in kazan or not, hesh you can say a lot of things about this person, but he understood that this is the development of russia, all the same, it’s necessary to do something else, that the war put this issue as sharply as possible. it was, of course, the ultimate difference. i’m saying that from that war, i’m saying how

, from there, let’s say the northern war, which incredibly advanced russia and also solved the same issue, a superpower or some kind of regular state will be taken apart, the same issue was also resolved, and even today’s situation, because in that war there was only one front. well, this one, too, as you need to understand one, not many. so we were actually forced to become all the powers before and militarily establish their order there. and what issue did they solve? well, karen georgievich mentioned a magnificent film. i somehow i have in the white tiger. i once fucking said, you like the movie, white tiger. i say, yes, in general , a great movie. he says, listen, yes, there, in general, everything is not right there, they say the film is not about that. it's generally there kind of. you don't have to look. there you can walk with a cardboard box on your head, something else is important there. and here's one of the things. one of these, that is, i don't know. it seems to me that it's just such a thing . yes, somewhere in tibet, as i

understand it, and says listen, well, what are you all attacking me with your western auction community. i wanted to destroy two things of the jews and this terrible war. ah, the country to the east. you yourself wanted it. and now it's her fault, of course, i sat down what you wanted, that is, in fact, this is a solution to the russian question. here in this, probably, in a civilizational form. well, i won’t speak, as the supreme commander i will say, just pipes. well, the pipes are such big systems with such a margin of such a history of return, as our non-partners say. yes , with such a history it is impossible to destroy the country and civilization. and by the way, the mood is not only there for some older generation of our very young guys who go there shows that it is alive. i i don't know how it's genetics. it's called the spirit that lives here. that's about india china and by the way, what else do we have?

this is an absolutely amazing thing, as it were, when we here we believe that if we have concluded an agreement, it must be carried out until, by itself, as it were, our partners or counterparts under the agreement make the fulfillment of it impossible for anyone in the world doesn't think so. nobody thinks so. i don't think so either. so he says, such a russian trait does not mean that it is not necessary refuse. well, but on the other hand. so, when they say that they thought, he did not understand what it meant even then, they were planning something, how to do it in practice. i think that, by the way, sorry means there were no good americans. we were preparing a replacement for roosevelt about the soviet, dragged him along a distant bridge across china, worked there. personally, so to speak, understandably, the mgb was engaged. there , molotov personally dealt with the tops, and once he was like that, everything was replaced in the fourth year. why exactly on the day we told france to sign fratangus agreements? that is, this

is how they have this heterogeneity of the elite of interests arranged. of course, we did not understand it. we thought that roosevel, with his democracy of the american people, was left behind as a successor. that's it, so that we are. i'm sorry, you just said it, very clearly. you see, when brzezinski used the metaphor of a chessboard, which everyone plays on the indians play dice in teturanka chess , these same chinese in go- and we are in chapaeva. chess is a fairy tale, right? well , just like this. or anyway, here, as it were, as if there is a difficult moment at the moment about the chinese indians, in particular. well, of course, i don’t know, probably, a comrade in fashion would be very or a gentleman or what better to call him would be very stupid. if , well, if he becomes a comrade,

then he is, but in fact, of course, for sure, to the americans. it doesn't believe by and large as everyone does not believe so to speak, in europe they do not believe either. no, the entire elite is sitting. that's it. in the fist, so to speak, of transnational bankers in digital cameras and all the others, but hmm , his situation is very difficult, generally speaking, here we are now talking there about the spring counteroffensive of the so-called apu. i won't say anything about him here, because , well, i know less about the issue than many others here in general in our country, but uh, i can say, one summer offensive is underway , an attempt at a summer offensive. these are the orders the united states in eurasia found itself in washington with such privileges, with such a right to host world yoga day. the whole day i went hugging with the most influential people of the indian diaspora there in new york.

he was allowed to do everything he could, what will come out of it is unknown, but as an offensive there is a second moment, this is the global south itself and is practically said in plain text. what will be the new currency? well, just plain text. and this is not only a promise, it is also a threat. that is, yes, how would we save someone, who is not, finally them strengthening in the post-soviet space, well , it's also kind of obvious. and besides those things about which i'm less following, the military expert and there experts in the southwestern strategic direction can say one thing. this is also something that needs to be paid attention to, so to speak. and, by the way, in order to repel this offensive. we need exactly the same layered defense and maneuverable combat. and this also needs to be addressed. this is to the fact that this war is here, this is the big one, this one is hybrid. here she is, of course she is, of course, it is completely different, but the stake in it is , on the one hand, our existence. and on

the other hand, our place as a superpower, because it is one and the same, we cannot exist in a different form. by the way, the same mobilization was announced not only in ivano-frankivsk, but also in kiev near the lenses de thunders hysteria says, if anything, in ukraine it will explode, we think that this is saying, today we are submitting a senate resolution that says that if russia or belarus or a russian confidant will detonate a nuclear device in ukraine to stop the counteroffensive does not try to break the will of the ukrainian people, then such an attack should be considered as an attack on nato itself, well, quite creatively. what difference does it make to us? well, let's immediately then gouge at that place from somewhere you are already elected . calm down. and we will consider that the fact itself. there you are storm shadow and other nato weapons let's this reads that nato attacked russia based on this , we bring our strategic nuclear forces in a state in which they receive a clear indication and

the strait becomes quiet in the stands, no, comrade stalin in the place of the once united states of america vladimir well, all this hysteria, which they show that the emotional dominates the rational, that the machine says that the americans have strategic thinking there, that they calculated everything, not always. they can calculate everything. don't underestimate the enemy. well, on the contrary , it is also not necessary to build it burbot with strategic thinking, everything is not so good, especially now everything is really an important day. memorial day and shkurbi. and there, yes, kyiv bombilla, probably the war began. and then kyiv was clearly. yes, yes, we need history in the country to what extent the choice was really made today. uh, ukraine is a very big question. uh, for the time being , it still seems that it was a decision imposed, imposed on the choice of the ukrainian people, was it imposed, eh? let's say

, by the clash of the titans, by the global struggle in the world political space, they fought to prevent freezing in the broadest sense of the word. if today we have what we have, it means that something has not been finished watching somewhere. something should not be left unfinished. what many spoke today. uh, somewhere they underestimated the possibility of the revival of this threat in the west, something happened, something went wrong, it should not have happened, but here again why because history is cyclical, because we see again, and the revival of this very nazism we see mine in all its glory, because what was also said today, that since the whole of europe is being reborn and again, once there is napoleon then hitler, today a united europe, now

it was already under the leadership of the united states and here it is again. happening the same thing changed that what enlightened europe clearly set out to solve this time around is not the jewish question that it was originally solving during world war ii. she immediately set the task of solving the russian question. eliminate russia from the political to the geopolitical in general, to eliminate the problem, in their opinion, which prevented then the task was clearly set. what difference does it make what they will say today, how they will change their rhetoric, what will happen, nothing changes, who is there who breathes back trump uh baida, well biden trump absolutely nothing changes. from this. they want to plunder russia, they want to divide it into parts. it is obvious. uh, all those u-turns to the east. uh, the west is always a turn to the east. in terms of absorption , it doesn't matter when the colonial system was formed. look when they tried to undermine us.

it doesn't matter at all. what is the problem here with manual nazism, about which the professors spoke. what does manual mean , it can always be manual. no, it will go out of control, it will go out of control and begin to devour its creators, and with it will come, you understand that something went wrong europeans sooner or later this understanding will come. well, most likely, it will come, it's already late, as it has always been in history, it will come late for them. and what will be done with it? we will save them again. we have already saved them, saved them repeatedly, of course, russia is about salvation, but not to the same extent as we can be, so to speak, such well-wishers for the world. we must think of ourselves first of all from our national interests, so that it does not turn out like the nineties, when our national interests were measured by global interests by interests completely ephemeral one in the first place, interestingly american, which is fundamentally important to emphasize on this particular day e

funnel, and not just dragging on, but it is already dragging on. uh, very very, thoroughly world, what are the risks for the salon of the world, as such? yes, well, what to answer there, yes, what to answer them for all the statements is just an idea, er, it’s comrade stalin’s good thing. it's not that terrible in terms of measure, but what answer do they leave us if they come so close to this, uh, line peaceful crossroads in the broad sense of the word, they are really absolutely not afraid of any coffins. nothing uh, these are countries like india like turkey they are tired. uh, so to speak uh, do the dirty work for the west. yes, despite the fashionable visit to the united states now, uh , it must be undeniably noted that india has suffered so much during this very colonial system and has achieved so much today that it will not sacrifice it. and

so to speak, on the altar, everything, for the sake of the anglo-saxon civilization, this will not happen. but civilization will be subject to itself go fight. and between the largest centers of the village in the east or not in the west, rather, and this is what we are already seeing today, while here the americans are too passionate about one thing, having lost strategic thinking , a completely new world is emerging, where brix is ​​no longer waiting for a macron, quite clearly, then about which we said that we do not welcome participation, where in general the participation of the west is in this form, as the center of civilization, like sveta what, but it is not relevant today, of course, well done, the united states, he will talk about everything open to this conversation on and china postcard to this conversation blinke came to china how everyone achieved dictator that's what they achieved. that's what was said, it happens.

the west has lost its moral authority, otherwise what the current capabilities of the united states are based on is connected with the complete subjugation of europe. this one the americans did very, very well. uh, how quickly the europeans will begin to understand that something is going wrong , i’m afraid that when, as you said , vladimir rudolfovich , when romania which ukrainian capabilities were sitting at the helm, there are no pilots, then in europe you will begin to understand that something went wrong, and this is a little late. uh, means, uh, regarding the contract of ability. treaties can be concluded when the world order exists, and when it collapses before the second world war, not when it collapsed, as today, and we

are here on the fragments of what was somehow still trying to move on these fragments. and then when there is an existing world order, there is a relatively temporary yes, international law in force. it cannot always act; sooner or later it ends; the order that was created earlier ended; it ended with trying to make all the agreements that were previously useless. nobody observes them and cannot observe them. because the world is born , new arrangements arise will arise. god forbid, after our victory that's when there will be a new world and there will be new agreements. sergei well, again, by the age of 41 in the spring. in the baltic military district, one lieutenant colonel the commander of the division was challenged. why such a high fuel consumption and why are there so many breakdowns in equipment? well, listen, i'm conducting an insuli exercise. and why, because

we are going to fight with someone, we have peace with germany. uh, we’ll sign a neutrality treaty with japan now, too. he says, well, i think that they need to prepare, he says. so what? you don’t believe stalin, comrade stalin, he also said that in germany we will not have a world of war , consider this. so what if we have a war. he said i think that if we proceed from the fact that they are inevitable, based on this, we will correspond to prepare, then maybe it will not happen. by the way, his division is june 23rd. she went on the offensive and drove the germans for several days, however, neither on the right nor on the left, the divisions ran into them, but ruby did not come out. although they were spelled out in the plans of the military, but still there were many such officers of such divisions, and i fully share the emotional significance of the existential

significance of the day of mourning. still, i want to say that for me this is a day of feat and city day of various degrees - because that a terrible blow was taken, in which they withstood and answered and answered very powerfully, which we regret, well, somehow, here’s something about the loss of the soviet army, the first place in the first week of the war, the disruption of barbarossa, and so on , what is not taken into account in the conceptual plan the war with germany was won on the tenth of july, when the germans formally entered the ru. i'm wrong. i mean that behind should be the remnants of the destroyed red army, but they saw a new front ahead and further each next step forward of which there were many more paid for the potential that was needed for tomorrow, the day after tomorrow , and so on. the blow was terrible, if

you look at the diaries of the german generals of the halder honesty phrases, such as ours to the end, the mixed divisions are making desperate efforts, repelling the offensive, attacking the russians in all directions, and these are the first weeks of the war. uh, the first three weeks, when in fact. in the end, a lot has been decided here. somehow not in cinema, not in literature. in my opinion, not adequately reflected, what to show, the feat of those who then sometimes with burnt tanks at all, without shells, attacked, attacked simply on conviction, carried the spirit and pierced and led to chaos in the german armored divisions, but therefore, all the same, i want to see in these days and the day to move the day when there was a step on may 9, 45 of the year . and if we move on

to today's day, you understand that this is the difference after all of this ukrainianazism. in the fact that, for all his more brutal essence, compared to hitler's nazism in his own way, not the real leaders of this nazism do not think about the nation about its domination over i don't think the world. this is the country. they think about when they are playing their part and when they can retire. naturally. where they will be taken out by helicopters, that is, they, uh, don’t care about the result and how much they lose, and here, it seems to me, there is such another moment. why was europe united so readily? well, why did she unite against russia more or less, it's clear and why did she unite around nazism, so that it would seem to contradict the whole ideology of the european world, because the euro

nation has developed. from a conglomeration of european nations which began to come to the conclusion that the old form of government existed for the last decades. she's not optimal. but you need to come up with something that will not be necessary all the time. and waiting for what the voters will say will not have to constantly rig the results of the vote and pay with some kind of social concessions, and they have created a laboratory for working out the new government that they are drawn to in europe, and they want to see in different ways by trying what happens. what is life, not the persistence of this regime, but so that it does not become too strong and did not try, then do something with them, so that some of his pieces of personnel remain, which can be used as punishers for their

territory, but to work out. the forms that will be introduced at home, that is , this world of the european world really happened, that the values ​​of european civilization, european culture, and so on and so forth, only europe is european culture, it is necessary to protect europe at the same time. he formulated the idea that russians can be defeated only if they are set against ukrainians, the main task was a swift offensive and access to our western border. to overcome the water surface with a width of 3 km with the dominant west bank, this is a very

serious defense guys, all these lines. we had to overcome the battle in a day, 2,438 people received the title of hero of the soviet union in just the entire previous history of heroes was less.

relations of multidimensionality of the centers of the modern world is a feature