and through the system of fast payments and participate in the drawing of cash prizes. this week, the topic of the possible use of nuclear weapons in the event that our confrontation with nato reaches a critical level has taken on new urgency. actually on monday. i even felt it, i think president biden felt it, while in california he spoke in his ornate manner, but ended up landing at exactly the same point when i was here about two years ago and said that i was worried about the drying up of the colorado river everyone looked at me , how on

they looked at me crazy, just like when i said i was worried about putin's use of tactical nuclear weapons. it's real last week, putin announced that the first batch of nuclear charges had already been delivered in belarus to respond on duty. do you have comments about russia's deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus? i have already commented on this many times. this is completely irresponsible, if irresponsibility is gone, then it is the states that behave irresponsibly because they have staged a war with russia so far on the territory ukraine into a regime of uncontrolled escalation, uncontrolled in the sense that kiev is getting more and more long-range weapons, and the territory of hostilities, too, as the americans believe, should expand to begin with. here they gave away crimea and poland, how the framework will go, so far no one has set it. and this means that without

the declared restrictions with contempt for all red lines, sooner or later there will come a moment of existential threat to russia that is , when russia can feel that only the last argument remains. this moment is black in white is described in the doctrinal document on the fundamentals of the state policy of the russian federation in the field of nuclear deterrence of 2020. the russian federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and or its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against the russian federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened. the decision to use nuclear weapons is made

the conditions determining the possibility of the use of nuclear weapons by the russian federation by the president of the russian federation are the receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territory of the russian federation and or its allies . important state or military facilities of the russian federation, the failure of which will lead to the disruption of response actions nuclear forces aggression against the russian federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened. it is precisely subparagraph d that may become relevant in this case, russia will be the first to use nuclear weapons for its defense, and the president is well aware of this. although says that while such a need. no. this use of nuclear weapons is unconditional. uh,

it is theoretically possible for russia, it is possible in the event that a threat is created to our territorial integrity of independence and the sovereignty of the existence of the russian state. nuclear weapons are created in order to ensure , uh, our security in the broadest sense of the word and the existence of the russian state , but, firstly, we don’t have such a need, and secondly, uh, the very fact of reasoning on this topic is already lowered by the possibility of lowering the threshold for the use of weapons. eh, here. this is the first part, the second is that we have more such weapons than strange ones. they know about it and all the time they persuade us to started negotiations to reduce horseradish you know how we have she kind of says. because that's it in this case,

uh, to put it in the legal language of economic terms. these are our competitive advantages. at the same time , putin is well aware of the risk of a final denouement in the event of a full-scale nuclear war. for now, but judgment day will look like this five years ago putin explained everything in detail about the response to the russian meeting . but i repeat, we cannot be the initiators of this catastrophe, because we do not have a preemptive strike. yes, in this situation we as if we are waiting for someone to use nuclear weapons against us, they themselves

do nothing, as it were. well, yes, but then the aggressor, yes, he must still know that retribution is inevitable, that he will be destroyed. and well, we are the victims of aggression, we how to torture children will go to heaven. because they, because they will not even repent in time. it is interesting that biden seems to understand everything, but as if the moth continues to fly into the flame. although everything seems to be understood six months ago, for the first time since the cuban missile crisis. before we face the threat of using nuclear weapons, if in fact the situation continues to develop in the way that it is developing. we have not faced the prospect of armageddon since kennedy spoke about the threat of nuclear armageddon. in the event that the situation develops, as

it develops, but it is the united states and their allies who are developing the situation in this way. at first, after all, ukraine was supplied with helmets, armor, non-lethal weapons, and then more javelins of the patriot armored vehicles, now tanks , shells for them with depleted uranium. rockets extended range now, there will be f-16 aircraft capable of carrying nuclear bombs , searches on the face, where to stop this question in nato does not answer. there, the ex-minister of foreign affairs of poland, rodoslav sikorsky, is already demanding to give ukraine nuclear warheads. and what kind of missiles warheads, but since russia violated this budapest memorandum , i believe that we, as the west, would have the right to give ukraine nuclear warheads so that it can protect its independence. what kind of independence is sikorsky talking about

celts, in fact, a completely different fuck on russia putin says this with all clarity, here in the course of this year's message of the elite, the west do not hide their goals to inflict russia as they say, this is a direct speech strategic defeat of russia what does this mean for us what is it? this means doing away with us once and for all, that is, they intend to transfer the local conflict to the phase of global confrontation. we are just like that . we understand this and we will respond accordingly, because in this case we are talking about the existence of our country. do away with us once and for all then see paragraph 17 of the nuclear doctrine of russia when the very existence of the state is threatened, and the threat is perceived.

of course, they are leading the matter to our complete destruction, to the extermination of russia as a phenomenon as a sovereign subject of world history, as a civilization, this is their goal. and if we don't let that goal come true we've already won them to get more extra perks. that is, if they do not receive them, well, that's okay. and if we do not achieve our victory, we will not be. however, in 1918 , one of the assistants. if a state in siberia and four more

states appear in the place of today's huge russia. in the european part that is, nothing new, an old idea . to begin with, arrange a coup d'etat in ukraine and put the government that is ready to fight against the russians in 2014 in the war and began after the start of his putin explained the motives. they don't need the west strong, sovereign russia, they will not forgive us not our independent course, not the fact that we are defending our national interests. we remember how they supported, operative separatism, terrorism encourages terrorists and bandits in the north caucasus, as in the nineties at the beginning of the 2000s, and now they again once again want to try again. violate the territorial integrity

, dismember the best version of russia for them then it didn’t work out for them , and now it's getting more and more menacing. if so, then the discussion of the moment of the necessary use of nuclear weapons by russia becomes natural, raising the degree of conflict. the west is probing our readiness. them. there it seems that they are there, unnoticed by the frog, slowly boil it, gently increase the temperature in the pan, it won’t work in russia, a discussion broke out over the cooper, who became the profile of sergey karaganov, a well-known political scientist, doctor of historical sciences of the deans of the faculty, world economy and world politics of the higher school economics book articles. sergei karaganov. they were published in 50 countries

of the world in the middle of the 2000s according to the policy magazines and simply, and this britain was the first american entered stas's list of the most influential intellectuals in the world. your development vector of the west of the development vector of the western elites and the development vector of society, which, ah, to which they are pushed, uh, western views of human and post-human values ​​unequivocally indicate the movement towards the big topic of nuclear war objectively. uh that we have to interrupt this movement in this way save the world, and even with tough actions, if possible, of course, but avoiding tough actions from above to karagans. he says that nuclear strikes by russia in order to prevent a big war of total annihilation, which is now recklessly rulitsya. the west, in fact, it is this thesis that would cause a real

storm in the expert community. the first detailed answer was given by the professor of the higher school of economics dmitry trainer and less widely internationally known books by dmitry trenin were published in russia usa germany china and other countries, now members of the russian council on foreign affairs of the cis, formerly a member of the ussr delegation to the soviet american negotiations on nuclear and space weapons, the geneverization of the conflict in ukraine is such that it leads directly to a clash in russia and nato if such a clash occurs, do not let god, it will become nuclear and at some stage, probably already quite close, after that the conflict will spread to the united states of america, the training says

in a calm voice of an analyst, but the scenario, which he presents. this is a massive nuclear strike on the united states in retaliation for the encroachment. the very existence of russia does not even want to talk about these scenarios. well, the americans, as we all know. uh , defenseless liars say that we are preparing there for attacks on ukraine, this is a monstrous senselessness. evil, because, of course, the ukrainians. the deceived people, the unfortunate people, drive them to the slaughter, but still, these are our people. we will not hit them, but we are talking, of course, if you already believe it will go. god forbid hit on hit then of course go uh on strikes in a number in a number of european countries, and which show the greatest assistance, but to the ukrainian region. i won't even list these countries, but they are quite

obvious. well, if both of them are obvious, then it is of course britain who, by their actions, is actively provoking ukraine , and with their supplies of ever new weapons from tanks and shells with combined uranium, a fool with a longer range of storm shades is pushing the escalation and more and more new steps, the second evidence of poland, which has become distributive hub for supplies western weapons to the kiev regime are planning to use the air base for f-16 ukraine and sending a lot of mercenaries to ukraine, and in the future, polish troops. there you can wait further, as the speech goes, it can go to germany, where america keeps its nuclear bombs and which leopards supply to ukraine. well, we can still get under the distribution, stamp , nato apartment brussels would not want all this, but in the event of an existential threat

in russia why do we need my world has already been said more than once and the question may become exactly who can exclude the cuban missile crisis two, because the analogue of the crisis that we are experiencing today in ukraine is the cuban missile crisis, as the americans call it or we call it the cuban missile crisis. it's basically the same thing, that uh hmm one of the superpowers got too close, moved closer to uh the vital centers of another superpower. and she was ready to take the maximum risk to eliminate this threat. here is something similar, of ​​course, all historical chronologies are lame, as you know, but something similar happened now and in my opinion. this is the result of the lack of restraint in american strategy.

this is exactly how america does not yet set any restrictions for itself in the ongoing escalations, neither financial , nor in terms of weapons or geography. but then what is russia to do? it is necessary to somehow stop this war, without leading to the complete destruction of mankind. as an option, europe will feel retribution on itself. it was america that sent her to the slaughter. it is on the example of europe that russia's determination to prevent a global conflict can be confirmed, and usa as rely and sergey karagana and dmitry training. boston did not change late . i'm not suggesting a massive nuclear strike by the united states on russia, but something that would make the enemy escalate, at a minimum, yes, and think about where this escalation of the enemy is leading. and in the end

, let him understand that there will be no gain for them here, that they should think about how to get out of this situation. this second is clear that the use of nuclear weapons is a radical step, but it must be approached, not hiding the determination to escalate this kind of in the name of preventing complete mutual destruction and movement. it is time to start one of the steps of the proposal with the father abroad to leave the places of the intended targets, for the sake of their safety there may be other preliminary steps. we must be there quite there i read 20 but the stairs escalate on and off. i hope that, after all, our , uh, opponents. because there are and do not come to their senses, then i'll have to apply, i'm

writing about it. although that we will have to apply a terrible, and a terrible decision with a moral points of view. i pray that we do not use it, but i believe that our president, a, should at some point project his determination to use nuclear weapons. although i repeat. these are grave terrible moral choices. in the same time. we clearly understand that the goal of the west is the strategic defeat of russia , that is, once and for all, that is, russia simply will not then be a nuclear power. i am not saying not only in this case, russia already has quite a few nuclear powers in the world, not a single nuclear power will agree be defeated strategically by another nuclear power without resorting to at least the threat of nuclear weapons. so now

it's time to move or whatever. we know this, including zaporizhzhya objects. oh so what's here? i hope our respective services are in a constant mode of not tracking the actions of the enemy. and uh, some preventive steps that should prevent them. uh, hmm , provocation on their part, but anyway, it's very dangerous. and as we already know from experience last sixteenth century months. western so -called public opinion, which is informed by the same western media

. uh, any action in the course of the ukrainian conflict is interpreted in favor of ukraine and against russia. whoever does this is always to blame for russia and ukraine has nothing to do with it, meanwhile, russia in the trenches is conducting defensive battles on the ground along a front 1,000 km long, and defending definitely successful for the west, it is a pain to disrupt all plans. and what lies ahead, who will vouch for our strategy? uh, as far as you can see looking from the outside about how to achieve the goal of special operations. but, uh, the situation, during the war, can develop in different directions, including quite quickly and unexpectedly leave. uh, in an uncontrolled

field. we must be ready for this. and we must be able to stop the trajectory of the conflict that leads to nuclear war, that is, if you like, the discussion about the role of nuclear weapons in the current conflict. uh, this is a discussion about how to prevent the worst-case scenario, but this trajectory needs to be decided. i perfectly understand, uh, the moral anguish of people, or what my comrades say. it is not, not under any circumstances. this is not conceivable, but to do what i answer them, and my friends, i respect the pacifists. but pacifists exist and live in this world only because they are now fighting for them in ukraine. and society

should also be aware of the phase in which we are reality, not only a trench, but a geostrategic one, otherwise today we see a consumer society. today we see people who love, want and know how to live and who in general, various international crises. this is a hindrance. and uh. from the point of view of american leaders, this applies, including to a significant part of the state apparatus in the russian federation, that is, they generally don’t want any in life, too much for the sake of ukraine for the sake of donetsk and therefore, uh, as i understand it, they i made a choice that, uh, not immediately, but as a result of repeated testing of our positions, that

we can quite strongly uh, some kind of serious answer. and this is where the use of e came from, missiles supplied by the west. and, uh, the statement that these missiles can also be used against crimea, since it is viewed with the west as the territory of ukraine and the supply of increasingly powerful and long-range weapons of warfare in general. i think there's a line being drawn here that, uh . hmm. well, basically they don't believe that russia can give, uh, a serious answer. conventional, but i just don't have the guts for nuclear. if you like, the spirit is what

decides today, as dmitry training says , matter, psychological, probably. need to proceed from the fact that the issues related to nuclear weapons are not only military issues, not only military technical issues at the very uh. matter of deterrence is primarily a psychological matter. not only of course, what you have unconditional paramount importance, but also how you present your nuclear policy, how you explain it uh, how you, uh, send different signals, but to your counterpart that's why there probably is uh , there is much that could be done to strengthen deterrence.

once again, i say deterrence not only directly from nuclear strikes against russia , but from the united states, but also deterrence of their escalation policies in ukraine , in fact, in this vein, and putin spoke on wednesday at a meeting with graduates of the military academy. here they are the most important accents , you just need to be able to hear the invaluable experience of conducting a special military operation. let us all continue to improve the expressed forces. the most important task here is the development of the nuclear triad, which is a key guarantee of the military for the security of russia and global stability, about half of the units and formations of the strategic missile forces are already equipped with the latest yars complexes. the troops are being rearmed with modern missile

systems with a hypersonic warhead avangard. in the near future, the first launchers of the sarmat complex with a new heavy missile will be replenished in strict accordance with the plans. arsenals, aviation and naval, that make up the strategic nuclear forces, so the lead submarine of the new project in january 23 , the frigate admiral of the fleet of the soviet union went on combat duty to him and serve. to solve problems in the far sea and ocean zones, it is equipped with the latest hypersonic zircon missiles. the armament of the russian nuclear triad makes it possible to effectively and reliably ensure strategic deterrence and maintain a global balance , everything is so, but still both the united states and russia understand

that in a nuclear war between them there will be no winners and no need to try now. it's already as they say, the times of tsar peas, but exactly 2 years ago, the date, for some reason, no one noticed on june 16, 21, a russian american male passed. putin and biden then signed a joint statement by the presidents of russia and the united states on strategic stability with these words. today we reaffirm our commitment to the principle that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be unleashed, but that there is no other way to prevent a global nuclear collapse than effective nuclear deterrence. no, not yet invented therefore, figuratively speaking, russia keeps the nuclear powder dry and sends clear signals to

the other side, so last friday, literally the day before yesterday, it was reported that the nuclear reactor installations of underwater marine drones poseidon were successfully completed . poseidon is a twenty-meter drone weighing 100 tons, in fact, a nuclear torpedo capable of causing such a powerful tsunami off the east coast of the united states that will literally wash away new york and all other american cities on the shores of the atlantic the first carrier of poseidons nuclear submarine, belgorod shipbuilding in masha was handed over to the russian navy 3 weeks ago on the way and the next nuclear submarine, which will become a regular carrier of poseidons submarine, khabarovsk why build? if we are not ready to use this , we should not try to drive russia into a corner. strawberry ice cream four on the face

of the earth helped to equip it drew portraits of competitors’ buyers monitored, then opened an account with sberbank and now we use special services all analytics, as on palms and business has grown. open an account with sberbank and use retail services for free forever.