and by their actions they are pushing the world into a global collision, but they continue to stick to the chosen course. in detail, the current situation was analyzed by the authors of the program host dmitry kiselyov this week, the topic of the possible use of nuclear weapons in the event that our confrontation reaches a critical level of nato sleep has taken on a new urgency. actually on monday. it even felt, it seems, president biden felt it, while in california he spoke in his ornate manner, but in the end landed just at the very point when i was here about two years ago and said that i was worried about the drying up of the colorado river, everyone looked at me like i was crazy, they looked at me, just like when i said that i was worried about putin's use of tactical nuclear weapons. it's real last week, putin announced the delivery of the first batch

of nuclear weapons. belarus baden preferred to answer on duty. do you have comments about russia's deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus? i have already commented on this many times. it's perfect irresponsibly, if he left without responsibility, then the states behave irresponsibly because they have put the war with russia so far on the territory of ukraine into a regime not controlled by escalation, uncontrolled in the sense that kiev is receiving more and more long-range weapons, and the territory of hostilities is also believed to americans must expand first. here they gave away crimea and poland, how the framework will go, so far no one has set it. and this means that without the declared restrictions with contempt for all the red lines, sooner or later there will come moment of existential threat to russia that is , when russia can feel that

only the last argument remains. this moment is described in black and white in the doctrinal document on the fundamentals of the state policy of the russian federation in the field of nuclear deterrence of 2020. the russian federation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear weapons and other types of weapons of mass destruction against it and or its allies, as well as in the event of aggression against the russian federation using conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened. the decision to use nuclear weapons is made by the president of the russian federation. the conditions that determine the possibility of the russian federation using nuclear weapons are the receipt of reliable information about the launch of ballistic missiles attacking the territory of the russian federation and or its allies , the use by the enemy of nuclear weapons or

other types of weapons of mass destruction on the territory of the russian federation and or its allies the impact of the enemy on critical state or military installations of the russian federation, the failure of which will lead to the disruption of retaliatory actions of nuclear forces aggression against the russian federation with the use of conventional weapons, when the very existence of the state is threatened. it is precisely subparagraph d that may become relevant in this case, russia will be the first to use nuclear weapons for its defense, and the president is well aware of this. although says that while such a need. no. this use of nuclear weapons is unconditional. uh, in theory it is possible for russia, it is possible if there is a threat to our territorial integrity, independence and the sovereignty of the existence of the russian

state. uh, nuclear weapons are created in order to ensure , uh, our security in the broadest sense of the word and the existence of the russian state , but uh, firstly, we don’t have such a need, and secondly, uh, the very fact of reasoning on this topic is already lowered by the possibility of lowering the threshold for the use of weapons. eh, here. this is the first part, the second is that we have such more weapons than strange. they know about it and all the time they are pushing us to start negotiations to reduce the horseradish. you understand how it was born with us, because it is in this case, to put it, uh, in the legal language of economic terms. these are our competitive advantages. at the same time, putin is well aware of the risk of a final

denouement in the event of a full-scale nuclear war, there is no talk of a full-scale one yet, but judgment day will look like this 5 years ago happens within a few seconds. we are convinced that the attack goes to the territory of russia only after that we strike back. this is a reciprocal. moreover , the oncoming one, because they are flying towards us, and they will fly towards us in the direction of aggression, of course, this is a worldwide catastrophe. and i repeat, we cannot be the initiators of this catastrophe, because we do not have a preventive strike. yes , in this situation, as if we are waiting for someone to use nuclear weapons against us, they themselves do nothing, as it were. well, yes, well then aggression, he still needs to know that retribution is inevitable, that it will be destroyed. and well, we are victims of aggression. we

will go to heaven as martyrs. because they, because they will not even repent in time. it is interesting that biden seems to understand everything, but as if the moth continues to fly into the flame. although he seems to understand everything six months ago, for the first time since the cuban missile crisis. we face the threat of using nuclear weapons if, in fact, the situation continues to develop along the path that it is developing we have not faced the prospect of armageddon since kennedy, baggin talks about the threat of nuclear armageddon. in the event that the situation develops, as it develops, but it is the united states and their allies who develop the situation in this way at first, because ukraine was supplied with helmets, armor, non-lethal weapons, and then more javelins rszo

armored vehicles of the patriot system. now the tanks are shells for them and missiles poor in wounds. extended range now, there will be f-16 aircraft capable of carrying nuclear bombs , a search for a person where to stop this question in nato does not answer. won ex-minister foreign affairs of poland, rodoslav vsekorsky is already demanding to give ukraine nuclear warheads. and what kind of missiles are the russians' warheads for? but since russia violated this budapest memorandum, i believe that we, as the west, would have the right to give ukraine nuclear warheads so that it can protect its independence. what kind of independence is this? and the kursk goal is actually spoken of, it’s a completely different fuck on russia. putin speaks about this with all clarity, but in the course of this year’s message or you don’t hide the west

their goals to inflict russia as they say, it is a direct speech strategic defeat of russia what does this mean to us what is it? this means to end us once and for all, that is, they intend to transfer the local conflict to the phase of global confrontation. that's exactly what we are. we understand this and will react accordingly, because in this case we are talking about the existence of our country. do away with us once and for all then see point seventeen of russia's nuclear doctrine when the very the existence of the state, and realizing the threat they certainly lead the matter to our complete destruction to the extermination of russia as a phenomenon

as a sovereign subject of world history, as a civilization, this is their goal. and if we do not let this goal come true, we have already won in being them, in order to receive additional additional privileges. that is, if they do not receive them, well, it's okay. and if we do not achieve our victory, we will not be. however, nothing new in 1918, one of the assistants. if in place of today huge russia there will be a state in siberia and four more states. in the european part that is, nothing new, an old idea

. to begin with, arrange a coup d'état in ukraine and put the government that is ready to fight against the russians in 2014 into war and started after the start of the sbu putin explained the motives of the west and sovereign russia, they will not forgive us not our independent course, not the fact that we defend our national interests. we remember how they supported operative separatism terrorism encourages terrorists and bandits in the north caucasus , as in the nineties at the beginning of the 2000s, and now they once again want to repeat the attempt to put the squeeze on. what is the name of the country? violate the territorial integrity, dismember russia in the best way for them, then they didn’t

succeed, and now it’s clear that the spiral of escalation is unwinding and it is becoming more and more menacing. if so, then the discussion of the moment of the necessary use of nuclear weapons by russia becomes natural by raising the degree conflict. the west is probing our readiness. them. there it seems that they are there , unnoticed by the frog, slowly boil it, gently increase the temperature in the pan, it won’t work in russia, a discussion broke out over the cooper, who became the profile of sergey karaganov, a well-known political scientist, doctor of historical sciences of the deans of the faculty, world economy and world politics of the higher school economics book articles. sergei karaganov. they were produced in 50 countries of the world in the middle of the 2000s according to the policy magazines and simply, and this was britain the first the american entered stas's list of the most influential intellectuals in the world.

your vector of the development of the west of the vector of development of western, grievances and the vector of the development of society, which , to which they are pushed, uh, western views of human and post-human values ​​unequivocally indicates the movement towards the big theme of nuclear war objectively. e that we must interrupt this movement in this way to save the world, and even by tough actions, if possible, of course, but avoiding tough actions from above to karagans. he says that nuclear strikes from russia for the sake of to prevent the great war of total annihilation that is now being recklessly driven. the west, in fact, it is this thesis that would cause a real storm in the expert community. the first detailed answer was given by professor of the higher school of economics dmitry trennin and less widely internationally known books

by dmitry trainer were published in russia usa germany china and other countries now a member of the russian council on foreign affairs smd formerly a member of the ussr delegation at the soviet american negotiations on nuclear and space armament of the geneveria of the conflict in ukraine is such that it leads directly to a clash between russia and nato , if such a clash occurs, god forbid it becomes nuclear and at some stage, probably enough. already at a close stage, after this the conflict will spread to the united states of america, the training speaks in a calm voice of an analyst, but the scenario that he sets out. this is a massive nuclear strike on the united states in retaliation for

the encroachment. the very existence of russia does not even want to talk about these scenarios, but the americans, as we all know, and the defenseless liers say that we are preparing there for strikes against ukraine, this is monstrous nonsense. evil, because, of course, the ukrainians. the deceived people, the unfortunate people, drive them to the slaughter, but still, these are our people. we won't hit them. eh, we are talking, of course, if it already goes. god forbid a strike on nuclear strikes, then, of course, go, but on strikes in a number of european countries and which a shows the greatest assistance, and i will not even list these countries for the ukrainian region, well, they are quite obvious. already if both are obvious who it is, of course, britain, who by their actions are actively provoking ukraine, and by their supply of ever

new weapons from tanks and shells with a combined wound, a duraket with a greater range of storm shadow pushes the escalation and everything to new and new steps, the second obviousness is poland, which has become a distribution hub for the supply of western weapons to the kiev regime , plan to use the zhesshu airbase for f-16s to ukraine and e, sending a lot of mercenaries to ukraine, and in the future, polish troops. there you can wait further, as it goes, maybe germany, where america keeps its nuclear bombs and which supplies ukraine with leopards. well, you can still get under the distribution of the headquarters. nato brussels would not want all this, but in the event of a threat to the existence of russia, why should we? the world has already been said more than once and the question may become exactly who can exclude the caribbean crisis, 2,

because the analogue of the crisis that we are experiencing today in ukraine is the cuban missile crisis, as the americans call it or do we call it the cuban missile crisis? he. well, in general, about the same thing, that uh hmm one of the superpowers moved too close to uh the vital centers of the other superpower. and she was ready to take the maximum risk to eliminate this threat. here is something similar. of course, all historical chronologies are lame, as you know, but something similar happened now and in my opinion. this is the result of the lack of restraint in american strategy. this is exactly how america does not put itself in the ongoing escalation of any restrictions, neither financial nor armaments or by geography, but then

what is russia to do? it is necessary to somehow stop this war, without leading to the complete destruction of mankind. as an option, europe will feel retribution on itself. it was america that sent her to the slaughter. here, on the example of europe, russia's determination to prevent a global conflict can be confirmed, and the united states, as sergey karaga also believes, on the subject of dmitry's training. boston did not change late . i don't i don't suppose a massive nuclear strike in the united states on russia but what would force the enemy, but save the pace of escalation, at least. yes, and think about where this escalation of the enemy leads. and in the end, let him understand that there will be no gain for them here, that they should think about how to get out of

this situation, then, secondly, it is clear that the use of nuclear weapons is a radical step, but it must be approached without hiding determination to this kind of escalation in the name of preventing complete mutual annihilation and movement. it's time to start one of the steps of a proposal with a domestic worker abroad leave the places of the intended targets, for the sake of their safety there may be other preliminary steps. we should be there quite there i read 20 and the stairs escalate on and off. i hope that, after all, our , uh, opponents will come to their senses. because there are and do not come to their senses, then i'll have to apply, i'm writing about it. although, that we will have to apply a terrible, but the decision is terrible from a moral point of view. i pray that we do not use it, but i believe that our president

should at some point. well project your determination to use nuclear weapons. although i repeat. it's a terrible terrible moral choice. at the same time, we clearly understand that the goal of the west is the strategic defeat of russia, that is, once and for all, that is, russia simply will not then be a nuclear power. not only in this case, russia is already quite a few nuclear powers, not one nuclear power in the world will not agree to be defeated strategically by another nuclear power without at least resorting to the threat of using nuclear weapons. so is it time to move now or what? well, from them you can wait for anything. we know this,

including the zaporozhye npp has long been an object of desire and perhaps a place for monstrous provocations. so here i hope our respective services are in constant mode and monitoring the actions of the enemy and, uh, hmm, some kind of preventive steps that will not even allow them to, uh, provocations on their part, but in any case, this is very dangerous. and as we already know from uh, the experience of the last sixteenth place in western so-called public opinion, which is informed by western means mass media. uh, any action at the entrance to the ukrainian conflict is interpreted in favor of ukraine and against russia. whoever does this is always to blame for russia and ukraine

has nothing to do with it, meanwhile russia in the trenches is conducting defensive battles on the ground along a front 19 km long, we are defending. definitely successful. for the west, it is a pain to disrupt all plans. and what is ahead, who will guarantee, of course ours, as i understand it, our strategy is based, as far as you can understand, looking from the outside, based on achieving the goal special military operation without resorting to nuclear weapons. i think it's quite obvious to everyone, but uh the situation, during the war, can develop in different directions, including quite quickly and unexpectedly. uh, in an uncontrolled field. we must be ready for this. and we should be able to stop that trajectory. the development of a conflict that leads

to nuclear war, that is, if you like, a discussion about the role of nuclear weapons in the current conflict. uh, this is a discussion about how to prevent the worst case scenario. situation, but you need to decide on this trajectory. i perfectly understand, uh, the moral anguish of people, or who speak in the open. i am even told by my comrades it is not under any circumstances. it's not conceivable. and this cannot be done. to which i answer them, and my friends, i respect pacifists, but pacifists, uh , there are animals in this world only because wars are dying for them, as our hours are fighting soldiers and officers are now in ukraine and society should also be aware of the phase in which we are reality is not only trench, but geostrategic.

and uh, from the point of view of american leaders, this applies, including to a significant part of the state apparatus in the russian federation, that is, they are cheerful, and in general they don’t want to, too much for the sake of ukraine, for the sake of donetsk and therefore , uh, as i understand it , they made a choice that uh hmm not immediately, but as a result of repeated testing of our positions, which can be quite strong, but provoke us not uh, expecting some kind of serious answer. and

from here came the use of e, e missiles, set by the west? and uh, a statement that these missiles can be used against crimea since it is viewed from the west as the territory of ukraine and the supply of increasingly powerful real combat weapons of warfare. er, and in general. i think the line being drawn here is, well, essentially not believing that russia will be able to give, uh, a serious, uh, conventional answer. and i just don’t have the heart for nuclear. if you like, the spirit is what decides today. as dmitry says, matter is psychological. probably should come from

that issues related to nuclear weapons. these are not only military issues, not only military technical issues. she herself e matter of containment is primarily a psychological matter. not only, uh, of course, what you have is of course paramount, but how, uh, how you present your nuclear policy, how you explain it, uh, how you, uh, send different signals, and to his vesuvius. so there's probably a lot that could be done in order to strengthen containment containment. i say again, deterring not only direct nuclear strikes against russia by the united states, but also deterring their

escalation policy in ukraine , in fact, in this vein, putin spoke on wednesday at a meeting with graduates of the military academy. here they are the most important accents, you just need to be able to hear the invaluable experience of conducting a special military operation. let us continue to improve the expressed forces in every way. the most important task here is the development of the nuclear triad, which is as a key guarantee of russia’s military security and global stability, about half of the units and formations of the strategic missile forces are already equipped with the latest yars complexes. the troops are being re-equipped with modern missile systems with a hypersonic warhead avangard. in the near future , the first launchers of the sarmat complex with a new heavy missile will take up combat duty. in

strict accordance with the plans , the arsenals, aviation and naval, of the components of the strategic nuclear forces are being replenished, so the lead submarine of the new project borey a in january 23 , the frigate admiral of the fleet of the soviet union went on combat duty to him and serve. it is designed to solve problems in the far sea and ocean zones and is equipped with the latest hypersonic zircon missiles , which allows you to effectively and reliably provide strategic deterrence and maintain global balance. everything is so, but still both the united states and russia understand that in a nuclear war between them there will be no need for winners and now it’s already trying, as they say, the times of tsar pea but exactly 2 years

back date, for some reason no one noticed, on june 16, the twenty-first year , a russian-american summit was held in geneva, putin and biden then signed a joint statement by the presidents of russia and the united states on strategic stability with these words. today we reaffirm our commitment to the principle that a nuclear war cannot be won and must never be unleashed, but that there is no other way to prevent a global nuclear collapse than effective nuclear deterrence. no, they haven’t come up with it yet. that is why russia figuratively speaking, it keeps nuclear powder dry and sends clear signals to the other side, so last friday, just the day before yesterday, it was reported that the nuclear reactor installations of poseidon underwater marine drones had been successfully completed. poseidon is

a twenty-meter drone weighing 100 tons, in fact, a nuclear torpedo capable of causing such a powerful tsunami off the east coast of the usa that will literally wash away new york and all other american cities on the shores of the atlantic the first carrier of poseidons nuclear submarine, belgorod shipbuilders sevmash handed over russian navy 3 weeks ago on the way and the next nuclear submarine, which will become a regular carrier of poseidons submarine, khabarovsk why build? if we are not ready to use this, we should not try to drive russia into a corner.

the kiev regime continues to escalate the situation around the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant. volodymyr zelensky, during a conversation with canadian prime minister justin trudos, announced a possible sabotage with utu with a radiation leak at the station , back it up with your intelligence data and wait for a corresponding reaction from ukrainian partners, in particular at the vilnius nato summit now