be they published, but interesting interviews or just a direct speech of those who were involved in the u murder in the murders of citizens of the european union on the territory of other eu countries from terrorist attacks, there was a lot of nothing like that. moreover, it would never occur to anyone to give a platform to people who express their attitudes in this way, but to the reprisals against public figures, all the more, by the way, let's remember journalistic solidarity, because the kiev regime directly says that it is going to kill journalists. what do they think about it german journalists who printed this interview or what? this again is not like they are journalists. maybe then the germans

should think about creating on their pages a permanent column for all kinds of terrorists, isis and al-qaeda jabhat nura on the other hand. they are correct. they introduced the qualifications of good and bad terrorists. they have bad terrorists. and there are so-called well, as it were, not very bad ones that can be used, with whom you can negotiate. sometimes don't be ashamed. you see a separate section. and give a platform to all kinds of extremist organizations. there they will share their plans justified, but by different circumstances. and we will read all this and understand what a terrible bond that has taken place between extremism and the western community. justify your brutal nature the ukrainian regime the kiev regime does not stop

attempting a senseless and suicidal counter-offensive, the losses have disappeared, they are already in the tens of thousands of people, however, as he recently stated deputy pentagon spokesperson sabrina singh, such losses were taken into account by the americans when planning military operations on the territory of ukraine, russia, well, of course. these are not citizens, not us citizens, these are citizens of ukraine, and not for that, they were created from the point of view of a beautiful western garden, in order to go to waste, in other words, to destroy ukrainians. irdy. the russians are also clearly following the plan previously developed by the americans; moreover , from an unsuccessful attempt to attack out loud in the west, apparently, they do not draw any conclusions and believe they can turn the tide in their favor by continuing even more intensely. pumping up weapons to ukraine, as mobilization takes place in ukraine, we saw all this. after all, no one

denies it. that people are simply not being torn out of their families' homes , not that they are being forced into some kind of coercive measures, but they are twisted and knocked down and forcibly kidnapped just to join the ranks of this very cannon fodder. according to the head of euro-diplomacy jose barrel, the eu will approve the expansion of military assistance to ukraine for 3.5 billion euros, followed by australia announced that it would provide kiev with 70 units of military equipment and artillery ammunition with a caliber of 105 mm. the united states announced a new $500 million military assistance package, once again underscoring regular arms deliveries. in ukraine, they only lead to an escalation of the armed conflict. these unrequited steps result in numerous casualties, including among the civilian population of the region. currently. the west is actively

trying to convince the strange global south to participate in the so-called peace summit organized without russia, allegedly aimed at finding a peaceful settlement of the ukrainian conflict. it's just interesting, look, what kind of wild logic, and not on the one hand, but they accuse us of russian russians, and of participating in this conflict well, you all know the accusation, but on the other hand, when they discuss any, as they call peaceful settlement. themselves of the world, they only appeal, apparently, to the kiev regime, or something, that is, they believe. er, this world might come into existence given the, er, situation. only if they get together and ritually discuss something or invite countries that, in principle, have nothing to do with this story, but they can support them, so to speak, morally or informationally and from this, peace will come against the backdrop of endless arms supplies.

in fact, the only task in this very format of the world itself is to promote the absolutely false formula of zelensky's peace, an attempt to convince the whole world of its non-alternativeness. well, i'm sure they'll end up with this, uh, demonstrate again here is the one, well, someone will say stupidity, someone will say, and the false promises that are laid down in this very thing, as it were, and the proposal for the formula of the world and in the event itself by those of the world, they will just see it again. now, probably, from a close distance, who will go. we have explained many times that the peace plans of the kiev regime have nothing to do with peace, in fact. this is a set of these ultimatum demands for russia to withdraw troops from its legal territory of the donbass of crimea, zaporozhye, khersons , to pay reparation compensation to kiev. there something else about confessing.

that's all, created with the active support of the westerners of the pseudo-legal tribunal. well, all this ingot that they promoted propagandistically. it is simply combined in one document , as they call it a document, and in fact it is only such an ideological development of an attempt to determine the outcome of the ukrainian conflict without the participation of russia, as everyone perfectly understands, they are doomed to rights, otherwise it would probably have been done a long time ago. but if possible, without russia there anything in order any. organize the world try it, or that from some additional vigil something will now begin to progress, regress , the desire will begin to invite us to the summit the maximum possible number of participants, primarily from the countries of the global south - this is absolutely clearly formulated. the only goal is to immediately enroll them in the camp, supposedly staunch supporters of those who unconditionally share the western point of view on what is happening uh hmm and

directly to ukraine around ukraine we have seen many such events. i will remind, please, the situation in syria, uh, the syrian settlement. how many they spent here in such kind of conference events, and on which in one day, well, in two. uh, hmm , they promised to settle the whole situation at once. i remember very well how they are among themselves. and, by the way, a very large scale. they assembled the united states of america in the center of europe, how it all ended up to those who don’t even remember what it was all called, because there is no effect from this. there for one simple reason, because all people who have experience and knowledge understand that, first of all, everything related to the onset of peace depends on the cessation of bloodshed, and, accordingly, the cessation

of the supply of weapons, without this, no round tables, conferences, symposiums, will not lead to anything, because the kiev regime has already proved this once by directly participating in the negotiations and even concluding an agreement, confirming it on its part and then literally immediately and therefore violating the words that will be there spoken. faith no, i’ll remind you at all, if the documents that were signed by the westerners of the western leaders, and the heads of the federal republic of germany of france er, and which became part of the security council, it turns out that no one was going to execute, despite the fact that they were mandatory for execution, like security council resolutions, what do you think they will do with even if some assurances are given during such summit conferences and symposium. nothing, they just forget. they need

to put a tick, and holding the next information and political event. we we call for responsibility and states that truly strive for peace. all the more so is the willingness to play a constructive role in the search for a policy of diplomatic settlement of the conflict. the west needs to feel its provocative presence at the summit in this undertaking only in order to create the appearance of broad support for its outcome. and this will just postpone the prospect of a peaceful settlement . kakhovskoy hpp when, as a result, as you remember, the destruction of the dam, there was an uncontrolled discharge of water from the kakhovka reservoir. downstream of the dnieper today it is known about 48 dead 126 people, hospitalized serious damage. ecology killed thousands, uh, animals in the lower neprovsky national

park washed away, the fields along the dnieper are at risk of whitewashing the north of the crimean canal. the destruction of kakhovskaya. the hydroelectric power station resulted in getting into local water bodies. dangerous for humans chemical fertilizer pesticide combustible. well, who thought? among the representatives of the kiev regime of similar consequences, it was also important for them to commit sabotage, to declare loudly to themselves, so to speak , to show the whole world what 35 settlements were capable of in the flood zone. do you think this will cause at least some kind of reaction of doubt in the kiev regime's own actions. never is it for normal people to find thousands of people in a flood zone. it's a tragedy, a tragedy, a pain. and, by the way, the motivation for helping for ghouls who sit on the bank is still once an opportunity to just be happy. this is another reason to answer this.

well, the way they usually do it there, judging by their inadequacy the next day. on novaya kakhovka , the water level reached, let me remind you, 12 m. and more than 20-2,000 houses also found themselves in the flood zone . receives financial aid payments. in this context, we were surprised, of course, by the reactions of specialized international structures, which are contrary to the principles of objectivity and impartiality. once again, they evaded condemning the crime of the kiev regime, which staged this sabotage. remember they are not in the know, and i have enough information. eh, they need something else in order to draw appropriate conclusions. everything i listed above is obvious. these conclusions

are not enough. although far perishing completion. i would like to conclude this this block. i i would like to remember the murdered first head of the donetsk people's republic alexander zakharchenko on june 26, he would have turned 47 years old. everywhere people carried flowers to the place, his death alexander zakharchenko, he just signed a set of measures to implement the minsk agreements and did everything to ensure peace in donbas died on august 31, 2018. as a result of the explosion arranged by ukrainian saboteurs, even then the kiev regime actively used terrorist methods, and the international community did not want to hear anything about this and did not look in this direction in order to see nothing the kiev regime built up this terrorist potential of fighting its political opponents, by the way, calling them its citizens, and she remembers. and

all this was done, of course, by order, including the western west. uh, sponsors, so to speak. any possibilities for a peaceful settlement were destroyed. alexander zakharchenko remains in our hearts in our memory an example of a true fighter for freedom, he is a true patriot, defender of his native land, and those whom we now legally call manager nazis and neo-fascists, all the facts stated once again prove that in the face of the kiev regime. we are trying to resist frank fascists terrorists. in addition , there are also packs of corrupt officials, so there is simply no alternative to fulfilling the tasks of a special military operation. go ahead. i would like to say a few words about the new financial instrument of the european union called the fund for ukraine on june 20, this new

initiative of the european commission to provide financial assistance to kim from the kiev regime was made public. in advance from 24 to 27, the european bureaucrats, guided by the principle. naturally, unshakable support for ukraine in everything, regardless of whatever it is, they just blindly continue to make loud statements about the provision of the kiev regime with regular tranches and financial assistance, this time in brussels they propose to create a target instrument fund for ukraine and it is called upon to assist in words, and the kiev authorities in ensuring macro-financial stability of restoration and modernization of infrastructure. i wonder which one, given that e zelensky and his gangsters destroyed it on their literally everything in different ways, in general, well, in a very short time, he succeeded in the impossible. one of the goals

of such an initiative to carry out key internal reforms on the way to joining the ranks of eu member countries is among the expected sources of replenishment of the budget of this undertaking. in addition to contributions to a third state and organizations , the possibility of using russian state reserves blocked by the european union is directly mentioned. in fact, we are talking about continuing the destructive course towards debt enslavement and the sovereignty of ukraine, this is all being done. not for free. it seems, so they will take from russia and give it to the kiev regime, and they will add more, and from their pockets, in fact , they are still in debt. everything in debt for ukraine is not a pity for ukraine in debt to the european union in the united states of america, so a significant

share of the funds within the framework of the fund for ukraine is planned to be provided to kiev in the form of soft loans. i think they should just call them quick credit everything became final. it's clear. ukrainians are unlikely to have funds to repay these loans in the near future , which obviously yesian financial assistance has already played an important role in the record growth of ukraine's public debt, according to the ministry of finance, and hmm ukraine over $ 124 billion, this public debt amounted to in april of this year, apparently , the next generations of ukrainians will pay off their current accounts, and, as you perfectly understand, not with money. they will it to make resources the remnants of the national economic base of sovereignty land. they have already paid off, however, it is not clear. for what now are the remnants, there will be if in the future generation anything at all remains a potential current, the final

plunder and bankruptcy of ukraine many, in general, now even on the territory of ukraine , realizing the sad reality, they say that the parties are more. no, not because russia, but because such people have led modern young ukraine over the past decades, because such tasks were set for those who considered themselves called themselves patriots, ukraine actually were conductors of western thoughts and not only western ones. by the way, when i say, well, that it’s not only western , but it’s obvious that for the sake of just their own personal interest, but corruption and so on, kiev politicians for many years did not shine at all or were ready for anything, if only snatch yourself something fatter. well, in fact, what it all led to, so many people in ukraine today, do you understand? all this

they just say that i heard such an expression, but i was struck by the honest word of strangeness, only the avatar remained . no one knows, well , who is not really interested in history from the country of its present, and no one knows. is there anything else left behind this avatar? or is it completely emptiness difficult to disagree with this? the situation is aggravated by the fact that the allocation of funds by the european union is directly linked to the fulfillment of additional conditions aimed at strengthening western influence in ukraine within the framework of the new tool, the ukrainian authorities are invited to develop a full recovery plan detailing the reforms needed to obtain funds and with particular emphasis on the transformation of the public administration system, the transition to a green and digital economy. that is, a country that has been developing agriculture all

its life, which, by the way, in the soviet union during this period had its own science and, by the way, a very good fundamental industry was developed. now that's it, please. according to the western model, we need both appendages with western resources. and so they will figure it out, and this is what we need to move to a green digital economy. all this, of course, based on eu standards and norms. e with the direct approval of the european commission to control the spending of funds established a multi-level system. audit. it is envisaged, including the possibility of unscheduled inspections by the eu members, the essence of which is that this plan is actually a strategy for the further so-called development of ukraine, the eu initiative is nothing more than a direct attempt to finally lead the external administration of this country, an additional situation, the cynical policy of brussels towards the kiev authorities is the inclusion in the liver of the conditions

for receiving eu financial assistance, the so-called requirements for compliance with the fundamental rights and freedoms of all citizens. this is ursula fonder phizer sorry, ursula fonder really came up with this, that the kiev regime should. to strive for the fulfillment of the helping rights and freedoms of all citizens. who invented this? could come up with this, only someone who has no idea at all that takes place on the territory of ukraine what rights and freedoms? which citizens, by the way, are cannon fodder. yes dictate, yes terrorism. yes , what rights and freedoms, who have not only that, but also enemies and pay attention to the fact that now think that an important aspect of their interaction. in this direction with the kiev regime is the concern of the ukrainian

regime of the kiev regime, and national minorities. this is who they should care about from the point of view of the european commission, but russians, or what? for this there were all these e, long eight years and even before that. and for some reason when we paid attention to this and the european commission of the european union of all these institutions, and western ones, had no desire to attach importance to this. what is it now to come up with and write in absolutely unreal things that completely contradict even the kind of music to give the one that accepts zelensky and the ban on russian books, but complete, so to speak, but a hole of the entire absolutely entire space. just a persecution of those who use russian direct persecution. of course, it is beyond all understanding that the kiev the regime is not going to comply with this provision obviously to everyone except the european commission.

i don’t know, they really, maybe the phaser was broken. what is going on is understandable. this is also the western curator who for many years turn a blind eye to the segregation policy pursued by the ukrainian regime and the destruction of the russian-speaking population of the total attack on freedom in the media, or they will simply write down this situation and will say to all questions that they have removed their responsibility, so as a position, so to speak enshrined in the document and for sure, the kiev regime will strive to implement it. well, that's logic. it is clear what it always leads to, and, of course, we drew attention to the opinion published on june 12 by the venice commission from this europe on the ukrainian law on national minorities. well, the so- called communities of ukraine are from 22 years old. you know, as they say, both laughter and sin. this is to the question. first of all , financial assistance to ukraine is conditioned by concern for national minorities, on the other hand. it's the same institution. this is the venice commission

council of europe, uh, i mean, it's not another planet. not even another continent - it's hmm, it's the european commission and the council of europe , so, yes, yes, hmm, they are all interconnected. previously , the russian ministry of foreign affairs has already explained the discriminatory essence. uh, the mentioned law and s-, uh, and said that it was hidden behind formal references to the international agreement for the protection of national minorities. and your rejection. this document was expressed by hungary romania , they have in ukraine, as you know, large public compatriots, however, in the current political conditions, to expect an unbiased assessment of the situation from the point of view of law and human rights standards, unfortunately, does not come from the advisory body of the europe website. the published opinion was another conscious step towards zeroing the reputation from the once, dear international structures, which , i recall, was originally conceived as a source of independent expert opinion in the field

of law, so instead of promoting constitutional development, strengthening democratic institutions. and the venice commission voluntarily turned its expert potential into an instrument of a political game; its conclusion is now used only to mark its own alien. that is, you know such a sticker, she sticks it on her own, they can do everything that is not theirs, they can’t do anything. so, there are a number of their own political ones, and now they don’t even do this with strangers , they are not embarrassed by the expressions we passed. it is repeatedly enough to open recent documents on russian legislation to see how tough it can be. perhaps, the vocabulary and the decision of the commission, when it fulfills a political order, but against someone ukraine is on the right

. , cosmetic in nature, repeating, in fact, the commission's earlier formulations regarding ukrainian laws on education and languages. in particular, once again there is a differentiated attitude towards languages ​​less know differentiated differentiated. that is, it is when one language, and so to speak. it is established, despite the fact that the majority of society speaks a different language and has been speaking from time immemorial, and the one that is native to many is simply withdrawn from circulation. at the legislative level, in addition to this, psychological mockery and moral persecution of people who still remain committed to their native language begin. and this is called a differentiated relationship. that's how please remember, under this

veiled term, the experts bashfully disguised outright discrimination against the russian language, which the kiev regime has been carrying out for more than a year. now it's not just discrimination anymore. this is a crusade against the russian language, these are global, uh, western efforts that are being implemented, including the kiev regime to abolish the russian language of russian culture, all russian did not work out a year ago, but the plans remained, where they can and are doing this expressed earlier on council of europe lines the scope of recommendations for adjustments and for whom legislation. which ones i simply let past my ears, yes, think about it, they said maybe there is no doubt that the current remarks will be ignored, because lawlessness, systemic violations of human rights, including national substances have already become a kind of calling card, that is, the zelensky regime but for now it ready for the money of western sponsors to fight with russia to the last ukrainians. he is forgiven even for the earlier frank common

world and european values ​​in defense of cultural, religious and linguistic diversity. turning a blind eye to the russophobic component of the new law on national minorities of ukraine and recognizing the validity of the defeat in the rights of the russian language in connection with the alleged russian aggression against ukraine, the venice commission de facto gives the green light, aggressive perforation and forced assimilation, clumsily, covering with the term transitional period. so you understand , the members of the venice commission cannot but know that this entire kiev regime speaks to each other in russian, well, they cannot not know this, if they do not know this, then in general what they are doing. what kind of experts are they, the question is, but if they know this, and we are well aware that they know this, how everything fits together in their head. and here in russia, if you say this gang inside one side, they speak russian and it is banned for the rest of

the population. yes, they are only for this and are brought to withdraw everything that has connected us for many years and destroy it. we are witnessing an international attempt legitimizing the persecution of the russian-speaking population of ukraine, bringing under this legiomatization a far-fetched legal basis for this process, and abolishing everything russian in this. to all appearances, this is the meaning of the work of the commission, as well as of any other council of european and, in general, western structures. in this direction. after all, these are double standards. we no longer call on such biased structures to respond to the arbitrariness of lawlessness that is happening in ukraine. we proceed from the fact that the successful implementation of the goals of the special military operation hmm will return justice to the ukrainian land and will allow living on its territory, and nationalities enjoy the full range of their rights. and, of course, i can't help but mention the interview of the president of france from macron's film. he gave interviews to french 24 and

french info. he called russia an accepted quote. you probably won’t believe it, but this is the fact that the only colonial power of the 21st century, waging an imperialist war and visiting the countries of africa, takes your breath away from the scale from the flight of thought from philosophy. i don't know if there is such an expression. in french, but in such cases it is customary for us to speak in lara and a hat, such tirades are on fire, they sound inappropriate, given the long-term dubious role of france itself in africa, the world community remembers the dirty pages of colonial policy. paris, which, by the way, and today seeks to exploit the resources of the candine, disguises its colonial methods and schemes with false rhetoric and imaginary concern, and for the welfare of africans forgot the briefing of the official representative of the russian foreign ministry

maria zakharova troops repelled attacks by the armed forces in the donetsk zaporozhye, krasny liman and south donetsk directions , the ministry of defense announced this in the military department also commented on new missile strikes on the territory of ukraine denis alekseev studied the latest reports denis greetings tell us how the situation is developing on the fronts. yes , they are building up contingents and drawing up reserves of equipment in the southern directions , our unit has become more active in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe antonovsky bridge. there they beat back to defeat with artillery, assault and army aviation, by the skillful actions of russian troops and artillery fire, an enemy sabotage and reconnaissance unit was destroyed while trying to land and secure on the northern part of antonovsky island during the day in this direction.