i did not know, i thought and saw this helicopter pilot. i saw this among the guys of fighters, it turns out that the stars that are stuffed are the merit of the board , not the crew, because there is no such thing that the board is assigned to only one crew, therefore, when you see stuffed stars. this is how much this car is, yes, different pilots, maybe this car, which struck or heard so many feats there, therefore they are marked with asterisks. this rebellion for them

is a direct personal pain, because their colleagues died, and there are guys. it's very narrow circle they all know each other, they all intersect. at the same time, regardless of who the helicopter pilots are there, that is, they, well, this is a single community and for them it is a direct pain, that is, they ask. and who will answer for our former comrades, all the more so, but they are professionals, you don’t hang noodles on your ears. and why was it necessary to shoot down a helicopter that could not represent any load, there are fishing bears a plane that, well, it did not carry any combat load, that is, it is more of a signal repeater. that is, why? and guys i was directly told about this, that is, for them this is not an easy question. and

watch one speech of the supreme commander-in-chief on saturday morning. and then serious diplomatic work, but understanding how the country reacted was enough for the armed rebellion of the embryos to be calmed down. without much bloodshed and without a battle of clashes. what we see, for example, in france, yes, and they immediately began to speak that language. and how and why did the regime stagger? how can you? and what we see in france police officers kill a teenager. a country gets up, just instantly on the ears of the police can not handle thousands of detainees. yes, already there more than 1,000 already in total

attack to some extent the mayor of the city on his macron family, however, at this time watching the farewell concert. the people then try. then the macron tries to calm down, the more. he says the more he hates him. you can compare it, for example, with moscow and rostov. you can compare it with our cities in difficult times with friday night, until saturday evening we didn’t even have anything like that. i believe that we must express our deep indignation at the arbitrariness of the french authorities to demand release. all detainees must be demanded that macron these unpopular

french authorities enter into negotiations with peaceful protesters. it's peaceful, the protesters are true and they guarded the nuclear facilities. quite right. this is my next thought. but this is peaceful protesters, but they just rob shops, but the kiev maidan was peaceful. so this is also peaceful protesters. well, it happens that police cars are burned, well, it happens someone fired a weapon. well, how is this different from the picture of the kiev maidan ? so immediately begin negotiations, demand that the state department of the european authorities against illegally acting in the french police and the authorities are not enough of this, we must pass the law and adverb this law in the name of the victim. a french youth, mind you, as manuals. yes inn really didn't show the french woman on her knees begging the police not to touch innocent children. and as comrade lieutenant general said very accurately. i express concern about

about the security of french nuclear facilities instead of storing tactical and strategic ones, if they have enough or any french nuclear weapons. we, as a permanently responsible member of the security council, should initiate this issue at the urgently convened security council to stand on the entry of a peacekeeping contingent that will ensure security without storing weapons of mass destruction. is there something wrong. borel, what's wrong with the face? macron, how are things, something happened europe is a garden. we have grown forests the rest of the world, most of the rest of the world is the jungle can invade the garden. well, how do you live in the garden? don't forget to try. call lukashenka maybe lukashenka

will be able to negotiate with the rest so that your french ass is not washed too much . the rebels they all hate your word means nothing to the french people. and the words of our president meant for the army for the people. because our people elected our president. and people respect our president. and who are you? and you are all european politicians, who are you who elected schulz, the system in germany is such that the people did not elect barrels? who elected? a ludicrous parody of the british prime minister the tiv chair didn't vote,

there wasn't even a vote at all. the people hate you. and they came to their senses. i still want to thank vladivostok for the poignant stories from my own zone, because you really show such men that you want to be proud of and when you see them, hear them, understand what these people are? they understand what russia is, they feel it with all the fibers of all the tips of their fingers, they understand what russia is, regardless of the age of 26 or 50, these are, of course, real men.

what succeeded? and here the authority of the leader worked. what did you say? and, of course, it worked that they did not flinch and the army and power structures remained completely faithful to the oath, especially there on the front line. and another aspect of this

past week. and yes, speaking of this rebellion. you will pay attention, how in general in this regard this collective west i am generally with admiration. e heard about what the director of the cia means , he explained about whether they were involved in this case, or somehow they were aware of it. i do not want to claim that they were aware and were not aware. they say they weren't. well, the fact that they were all waiting for something like this to be squeezed out of it, that it would end, it was sure to be some kind of profit for them. it is quite obvious and therefore the first part of this week is such a collegial disappointment. didn't work out didn't work out fell for this bet in the form here is the rate of the beaten failed, but at the same time this week was marked by the fact that

in fact, after 2 days a month. and uh, i just don't want to right now. eh, how is it sometimes done? rate. it's in the success and failure categories. this will not be entirely correct, because, firstly, the fighting will probably continue. and maybe there will still be some kind of active phase ahead, but now the second part should be obvious. they themselves need nato, i want to say something about something else. it’s quite obvious that someone the calculation that was for this month, he absolutely, uh, turned out to be not the one, and who was expecting a collective smell, what did he say in a straight line? yes, it's quite obviously the police computer is one thing. yes, he said it, yes , and many others are talking about it. by the way, i'll just show you the miles. a war on paper is a real war - these are different things in a real

war, real people die. the real people are at the front. real people are behind military equipment. real bodies are torn apart by explosives and so on, but when the computer says you move quickly, then the real war will probably go slower, as i said, then the counteroffensive will take 6-8-10 weeks, it will be very difficult, it will be very long, and it will be very, very bloody and no one should have illusions. on this score, he used to say that it would be very, very pink for ukrainians for 24.72 hours. all the russians ran. yes, and remember, it means that this cutting blow means the sea of ​​\u200b\u200bazov, and so on and so forth. so let's state that the expected result no, and from this there were two consequences. one uh means one thought, one, so to speak,

the resultant political of what is happening was expressed by the body that said that listen to a year and a half. we have been helping for a year and a half, which means we are financing 27 billion e., the treasuries of the european union have disappeared somewhere, which means that the result is e, i almost quote putin on the spot the economy is in order the russian economy in europe the crisis is at the front. well, relatively speaking, no change. if you mean the contrast, not the exact quote, but the meaning is absolutely accurate simultaneously. look, if you look, er, it means to read serious european publications today. they are with one voice. they talk about one more thing. they say, listen to our financial and military support resource for ukraine. well europeans. i didn't ask for endings. this is what the germans say. this is what the italians say, and many others. about pizzas that soberly assess that they

can really do what they invest and the real result of what is happening. this is one pragmatic position, by the way, to say, that's the organ. eh, it's in any case of a person who wants not wants he once supported, as part of the european union, european sanctions. he, uh, is always there, showing some kind of front, but nevertheless, he is also a participant in the support of e ukraine, but he has a sober head. he is a hungarian nationalist in a good way. he directly says that for hungary what is happening. this is a bad hungarian patriot, well, let's say in a good way. yes patriot, i can't find any nationalists for me, a good sense of a nationalist on different sides. when well , well, let it be. eh, let's not because it is a connotation of a negative feature. yes patriot uh, and he can't he can't see it and can't not say it, and because otherwise the hungarian will tell him. listen and how we have here you look. but according to the laws of western logic, according to

the law of washington's logic, there is another consequence of this just this week, so, uh, marowetsky turned to washington. supply us with a nuclear weapon with motivation. what does it mean that the russians are deploying, uh, technical nuclear weapons in belarus, just in case . i remind you that from kaliningrad to warsaw on 200 km closer than from minsk yes warsaw and in terms of. here is an abstract, understood by the polish security, the fact of the appearance of russian nuclear weapons on the territory of poland , it is for the defense of the ability to have nuclear weapons more like in kaliningrad. no, i say, if you imagine that it would appear in kaliningrad, no, there are carriers, but physically we mean that we declared that it was not there. if correct, if we imagine that they appear on the territory of the russian federation no, if we

place them there, then we have this right and then it seems to be, uh, we are 200 km closer and then another answer arises. after all, if something happens to imagine a nuclear conflict. today , five other countries are targets, in this case, it is not poland. but if poland has nuclear weapons, it is closest to us, then it is the first target. what are these national security issues? it is absolutely obvious that the appearance of american nuclear weapons in poland is a first strike weapon. it is obvious that this strategy is designed for the fact that if something happens, the first button will be pressed, including including in european, is going to go the way of ukraine as well. and then two wonderful stalemate and two wonderful quotes. uh, so he repeated zelensky’s statement this week that the only condition for ending the war is the withdrawal, and russia at the turn of the ninety-

first year and asked the americans. so put him this atomaks, which have a range of e flight 300 km. well, experts in the field of military affairs can correct me here. well, what i know is in order to be able to place them at a point where it will be possible their uh, it’s to carry strikes on the crimea and it’s completely clear that if you imagine that this goal is being realized, it raises the degree. e military simply confrontation is completely new level and all the talk about that, i specifically looked today. and where in time are those dates, when this turning point occurred, it is possible or impossible with the help of american, let's say, combat systems to strike at the territory of the russian federation this autumn, autumn of last year. so, but when, or rather, the axis, well, yes,

last fall, when there were still fluctuations, whether it is possible or impossible today, these fluctuations are no longer there. we know very well that nato calibers are flying to the territory of the russian federation, and to imagine that these long-range missiles will strike at the crimea answer in order to prevent this uh, this uh, or rather stop this degree of tension, in my opinion, in my opinion in this. unfortunately in this dialogue. let's say. so those who today, for pragmatism and those who today raise the degrees of this conflict , the latter will win, and my opinion. they will win for the simple reason that if they don’t raise this degree today, if

they don’t continue pumping ukraine up today, with these offensive systems, then read borel, who says that as soon as we stop this work, ukraine will lose in 2 weeks, and this bitumen is understandable that for now, for the time being , both washington and europe, which is still subordinate to it, but already beginning to waver. they are still here in this in this direction reflections on the future. bye. i think it's going to go on and require us to take a brand new decisive military action, i agree with you this week was also an interesting moment . hummers can be made one of the kander? we brought down there said then the children's question, what are we waiting for? with the rest of the bridges, what then, we are waiting for the question that was asked on february 24th. the answer should give neyat. well, you understand that

they will be given everything and at 16 they will give it all. may be you finally, we will test nuclear weapons. i am not saying that the test is applicable. at least tactical nuclear weapons, to show that we have it, because here, as they think, the one that was tested. it is the same for many years, as it is inscribed, when it was last tested, and new ones always have doubts that it does not work. well, enemies. maybe, so that there are no doubts, tests, by the way, to make it clear, and then quietly and carefully on combat duty, so that they understand, if you want to play for an increase in the degree, we have something to answer raise. so mom don't worry. well, again, i'm not a professional, so these are my purely amateurish fabrications. but i know exactly what rank you want. major yes, so i realized that i would like to be a senior major. did

you know that my grandfather was a participant in the great patriotic war, who graduated as a major, when i said that you were a major. so i corrected you. he says, i say one thing, but the older major of the state security agencies is up to 43 years old. it was a very serious title. here is what was said about past events and at the same time is shown today again with your eyes to stroke, what you saw at the front brings us to the topic of the consolidation of society, and we saw this consolidation. we must pay tribute to the leadership of our country. well, and to our citizens, who, each in their own place , managed to demonstrate precisely this consolidation. but since we are raising various topics, people come to me to talk about the economic sphere in this way. i'm asking a question here. and what prevents us from showing this kind of consolidation in the economic

sphere? and so i wanted to present it today. some such i will not say that the original, but some new look at the explanation. why do all our calls to communicate with the financial bloc financial economic bloc. they break rocks like that. let's see what banks are, as such banks actually. or these are not intermediaries, this is such a common opinion, but it is erroneous. today, banks are no longer an intermediary between those who have money and those who need money, not those who had yes, banks today are still special institutions, who create new money under a state license and according to certain rules for the implementation of certain projects. and when the bank creates new money. he thereby creates new rubles, which are actually provided by the entire economic potential of our country. like the same ruble that had already functioned before. and when we talk about the right to create new money or issue loans. this is the right to manage the entire economic

potential of our country. maybe in this lies a certain secret, conditionally, the secret of what it is not so easy to part with such a position in the society of the financial economic bloc, and it is precisely today that the state needs to subjugate the complete management of the financial economy. what block, which means when you issue credit resources, when you create new money, you thereby subordinate the management of all economic potential to the interests of our society. today , state-owned banks, despite the fact that they are mostly owned by the state , are not used by the state as agents of development. and if you look at the recent past of many countries was the same in america during the rosalt period, and after that there was germany in the mentioned koreas, japan and china, it's all strange, where india today is the most severe management of gestures, meaning that it is completely controlled in the financial sphere.

the state manages this process, understanding the essence of this process. and when we are talking about emission, there is often a discrepancy that the mission also leads to inflation. but this is not just incorrect. this is an invalid definition of a mission. development is impossible. without it is impossible to imagine the emergence of new money, and therefore, when we talk about what we need to do, then, of course, we must first of all pay attention to exactly how this is being implemented today. i would like to give simple examples. let's look at today's america, i won't, i don't have time to talk about all the countries. but here, for example, america, what we have, we have unprecedented inflation for america. we have a decrease in growth rates, we have, as a result, an increase in the rate, the federal system that we have in our country, the president said that we have summed up all the numbers. it’s just that the manufacturing industry is 12%, it’s just that in general it reaches five percent of gdp

, er mishustin emphasized that our budget has grown by 10% due to non-commodity industries, when we see all this, we have the lowest inflation, and in the food sector we have us deflation, that is, correspondingly lower prices, we have with you the lowest. unemployment and what we see again the central bank is not only questioned, but declares that in the month of july it raises accounting rate. well listen. well, well, this is, and now it is understandable for me, which means, apparently, uh, for the actions of the current weight of the central bank , the recommendations of the currency fund are more significant, which limits the potential of our development. well , imagine in this, with such a dynamic of economic development, to limit growth, increase the discount rate, and thereby bury the economic development of the country. but this is permissible in the current conditions, and accordingly it must be accepted. yes, we need to take action against this. what steps need to be taken which was just a year ago.

including thanks to western actions, it was undertaken that a currency control was introduced. uh, the procedure for the return of foreign exchange earnings was introduced, respectively, uh, a restriction on financial speculation. and we must tell you that today our country is in the field of the financial market. it is scanty in relation to the world world system and easily more than the currency of not only our country of any country of world capital. maybe that's why we need to just limit the speculation, and eliminate them altogether at this stage, because banks have to earn. not on this, respectively, all these measures were applied and we need to return to it and there is no need to speculate on the fact that this supposedly hinders the development of our economy, in general, the topic of economic liberalization is a very wrong word. well now it's mentioned. i want to say that just the meaning of liberalization is that we must limit our own economy to the literal impact of the western financial

system to a limited extent to protect. we must build its financial system in any way, cheap. like this leaky sieve, but as a system in which there is a clearly understandable financing of the economy , as you know, if precision irrigation or drip irrigation , we must make it so that we will have an emission mission, and we will have, uh, a lot of multi-channel such where, with the help of state planning, those points of growth will be clearly defined, which today the government is well aware of , and thanks to this, we can ensure our economic sovereignty. well, the end. i would like to say that, of course, as they say and the current stage of development of our economy. we have a potential that we simply cannot afford. we don't have that luxury. well, to destroy it by following the prerequisites of the central bank to increase the discount rate, therefore , no matter how we revolve around this. i believe that today the whole future is in the hands. not just our leadership, but we still need to take this step

and we have, uh, a national fund. excuse me, the financial institute under the president, which includes me as a representative and the government of the central bank, there and the two houses of parliament must be made so that it is working, it is not necessary that he said, the minister of finance, the minister of finance, is interested in today well, in a good way, he is interested in the dollar rising. well, how can the dollar rise in conditions when we have a surplus in the external trade balance, but this is a man-made phenomenon. we must urgently return the dollar to the level that we had just recently. this can be done thanks to the stock of currency that we have for outside the country, moreover, the stability of the exchange rate, i repeat this once again , the stability of the exchange rate ensures our confidence. including entrepreneurs of tomorrow. they can plan their own future. and since they can plan, then the stability of exchange rates will also add stability to consumer prices. and thus, the prerequisites for our economic growth were 62 kopecks before 2 kopecks. most recently, we have 60 rubles. i'm really no

without any irony because and why are we generally tied to the dollar, you we are right in one thing today, thanks to such a system of our economic coordinates, we can set the dollar exchange rate to keep this system for a long time, well, we de-facto assign it anyway. at least tomorrow you appoint him. they are the same great number of restrictions that say that there is close to nothing. i just can't understand, and who needs a dollar? that is , it is needed so limited and understandable to a circle of people that when the whole country somehow plunges into this discussion of the dollar rate, it is not clear here, and for some reason this is not enough again we are moving away from the cis from rublev's price of education. that is, we are talking about our sovereignty, but anyway, we will try in one form or another under duva, well, now, well,

let's replace the dollar in the pit. this principle does not change and should not be so, the ruble should not only be a funded currency, but also an investment currency, moreover, it is the only accounting currency and our states are able to provide and give this monetary unit these functions. we can do it all by ourselves.

having abandoned the soviet past, it was necessary something to fill this gap after the war.